broken link in debian doc page.
I don't know whether this is the right list, but ... in http://www.debian.org/doc/user-manuals#quick-reference there is a broken link http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/reference/reference.en.pdf best regards, g.bonacci
Re: Web Pages TODO List - Security
* doug jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-07-20 18:53]: > So, I will make those corrections and send the patches back to the list > to be commited, or bug reports to www.debian.org, or ...? Send them to the list, IMHO no need to bloat the BTS with it. If noone reacts you can still send them to the BTS for them to be more visible. About your initial question if the security team should be informed of the changes, I guess Josip misunderstood it (or I do ,). You don't need to inform the security team about changes that doesn't change the core text of the advisory. If it's about changes to the infrastructure of the files (like, links back to the archive or cross references) you don't need to inform them. If you on the other hand like to change texting which might change the meaning of the text it would rather be a good idea to ask them. Uhm, on second thought, I guess Matt and/or Javier are doing a database of crossreferences to vulnerability databases, they might be interested in your changes in that part, too. So long, Alfie -- use Mail::Signature; $sig = Mail::Signature->new; print $sig->random; pgpVWw4ncb0eK.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#202236: marked as done (www.debian.org: do @packages messages bounce?)
Your message dated Mon, 21 Jul 2003 11:43:31 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#202236: www.debian.org: do @packages messages bounce? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jul 2003 04:43:05 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 20 23:42:56 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from tx.symonds.net [64.246.28.87] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19eSVj-0003ko-00; Sun, 20 Jul 2003 23:42:55 -0500 Received: from tc218-187-82-36.2-7.pl.apol.com.tw ([218.187.82.36] helo=debian) by tx.symonds.net with asmtp (Exim 4.04) id 19eSVi-000293-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 00:42:55 -0400 Received: from jidanni by debian with local (Exim 4.20) id 19eN9n-eR-Jd; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 06:59:55 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="BIG5" From: Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: www.debian.org: do @packages messages bounce? X-Mailer: reportbug 2.18 Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 06:59:55 +0800 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.7 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06,HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: www.debian.org Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-21 Severity: normal Whenever I send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I get no response. I recall these were supposed to be forwarded to the owner of some_package. Maybe they just don't reply, but probably, just like bugs.debian.org, you have set it up so that if there is any mail trouble, all bounces are squashed ? Sorry I send this query as a bug, but that's the only surefire way I know. --- Received: (at 202236-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jul 2003 09:43:38 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 21 04:43:34 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from prvidomaci.srce.hr [161.53.1.72] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19eXCg-00073a-00; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 04:43:34 -0500 Received: from amavis by prvidomaci.srce.hr with no-scan (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19eXCf-0001tg-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 11:43:33 +0200 Received: from joy by prvidomaci.srce.hr with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19eXCe-0001tR-00; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 11:43:32 +0200 Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 11:43:31 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#202236: www.debian.org: do @packages messages bounce? Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i From: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-15.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 06:59:55AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote: > Package: www.debian.org > Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-21 > Severity: normal > > Whenever I send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I get no > response. > > I recall these were supposed to be forwarded to the owner of > some_package. > > Maybe they just don't reply, but probably, just like bugs.debian.org, > you have set it up so that if there is any mail trouble, all bounces > are squashed ? Possibly, but generally it works like email -- there's no return receipt. It's possible that nobody is answering simply because nobody is there to answer. (It's summer vacation time in the northern hemisphere...) It's also possible that your broken headers From: Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> are at fault. -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness.
Halo apa kabar ??
Yth Bapak/Ibu/Sdr/i Salam Sejahtera, Perkenalkan nama saya Gusti Eka Putra, ingin mengajak anda untuk bekerja sama dalam bisnis yang sedang saya tekuni saat ini. Saya mengetahui email address anda dari salah satu web di internet dan saya berpikir bahwa anda menyenangi komunikasi lewat internet. Oleh karenannya, saya ingin membagikan kesempatan ini kepada sesama rekan, kesempatan untuk melakukan kerjasama usaha melalui internet. Mungkin tawaran ini tidak sesuai bidangnya dengan apa yang anda harapkan, namun tidak ada salahnya bila anda mengetahui informasi mengenai bidang-bidang pekerjaan lain yang bisa memberikan penghasilan bagi anda dan keluarga anda. Bisnis yang saya tawarkan ini bahkan bisa anda lakukan walaupun saat ini anda sedang bekerja. Anda tidak perlu meninggalkan pekerjaan anda saat ini. Untuk informasi dan pendaftaran gratis anda bisa buka website berikut : http://ekaputra.mainpage.net/ Terimakasih atas waktunya, mohon maaf jika saya mengganggu waktu anda. Salam Sukses Gusti Eka Putra
Error in webwml/english/partners/index.wml ?
Hi all, I am translating webwml/english/partners/index.wml (1.59/Nov 19 2002) and I read in the line 84~89: [...]trustsec pays two Debian developers to work on [...] [...] [...] [...] They've paid and worked on the free Debian CDs for LinuxTag 2001 in Stuttgart. It is correct (the developers *have* paid and worked on ...) or there is an error (the developers *were* *had* paid to work on ...)? -- *ANTISPAM*: my address is *not* forged, but it is valid *only* up to December 31st 2003 Ave Johan Haggi ante diem duodecimum Kalendas Augustas MMDCCLVI ab urbe condita
Re: Error in webwml/english/partners/index.wml ?
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 02:53:24PM +0200, Johan Haggi wrote: > I am translating webwml/english/partners/index.wml (1.59/Nov 19 2002) > and I read in the line 84~89: > > [...]trustsec pays two Debian > developers to work on [...] They generally do that. > [...] They've paid and worked on the free Debian CDs for > LinuxTag 2001 in Stuttgart. The company did those two things that are of particular mention. -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness.
Bug#196580: marked as done (www.debian.org: More verbose DSA titles (for 'multiple'))
Your message dated Mon, 21 Jul 2003 18:03:21 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#196580: Security Alerts -- gps has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jun 2003 07:51:26 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 08 02:51:22 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from pd9e7d239.dip.t-dialin.net (sbo-fido.de) [217.231.210.57] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19OuxV-0006By-00; Sun, 08 Jun 2003 02:51:21 -0500 Received: (qmail 9853 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2003 07:51:18 - Received: from unknown (HELO atari.antcom.de) (192.168.1.99) by 192.168.1.98 with SMTP; 8 Jun 2003 07:51:18 - Received: from ernie by atari.antcom.de with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19OuxR-0001YG-00; Sun, 08 Jun 2003 09:51:17 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Roland Stigge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Security Alerts -- gps X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10.1 Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2003 09:51:17 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Roland Stigge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: www.debian.org Version: unavailable; reported 2003-06-08 Severity: normal Hi, on the _front page_ at http://www.debian.org/ under "Security Alerts", the description of "DSA-307 gps" should be "multiple vulnerabilities" instead of just "multiple". This should also be adjusted at the page linked from there (Debian Security Advisory: http://www.debian.org/security/2003/dsa-307). bye, Roland -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux atari 2.4.20 #1 Fri Apr 4 11:15:24 CEST 2003 i686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ignored: LC_ALL set) --- Received: (at 196580-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jul 2003 16:07:13 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 21 11:03:46 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19ed8c-0001ED-00; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 11:03:46 -0500 Received: from pd9e395b0.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.227.149.176] helo=djpig.hell) by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp (Exim 3.35) id 19ed8Z-000355-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 18:03:45 +0200 Received: from djpig by djpig.hell with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19ed8F-0007XU-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 18:03:23 +0200 Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 18:03:21 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#196580: Security Alerts -- gps Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-15.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 01:35:38PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 09:51:17AM +0200, Roland Stigge wrote: > > on the _front page_ at http://www.debian.org/ under "Security Alerts", the > > description of "DSA-307 gps" should be "multiple vulnerabilities" > > instead of just "multiple". This should also be adjusted at the page > > linked from there (Debian Security Advisory: > > http://www.debian.org/security/2003/dsa-307). > > I think he has a point. In the mail there you read: > Vulnerabilities: multiple > > It would be better readable, when we would write "multiple > vulnerabilities" on the webpage (and this was done in the past, see > the DSAs from 2002). > We can even fix this in the conversion script. > > Any objections that I fix this? There wasn't and so I fixed this in the mentioned bug reports and in the parse-ad
Rawwrite für Windows
Hallo Leutechens! Ich bin ein hoffentlich-bald-auch Linux Nutzer, habe aber so meine Anlaufschwierigkeiten. Da ich auch von DOS keine Ahnung habe um die Disketten-ISO`s zu erstellen und dann über das Netz zu installieren bin ich durch Zufall auf der Seite von Mandrake auf einen Link gestoßen wo es ein Rawwrite Programm für Windows gibt: http://uranus.it.swin.edu.au/~jn/linux/rawwrite.htm Es ist auch GNU/Public License. Vielleicht hilft es ja dem einen oder anderen, man könnte die Quelle im Installationshandbuch nennen. Viele Grüße, Max
Bug#202303: www.debian.org: /devel/join/newmaint should encourage to contribute before applying
Package: www.debian.org Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-21 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch hi, the current threads on debian-devel about the nm-process make me think that some confusion could be avoided in the future by small changes to the new maintainer page encouraging interested persons to contribute to debian in a significant way before trying to apply. i attached an example cu robert -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux sandbender 2.4.20 #3 Sat Jul 12 11:40:52 CEST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index: newmaint.wml === RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/devel/join/newmaint.wml,v retrieving revision 1.44 diff -u -u -r1.44 newmaint.wml --- newmaint.wml18 Jul 2003 08:56:25 - 1.44 +++ newmaint.wml21 Jul 2003 16:54:05 - @@ -9,8 +9,13 @@ can find all the details of applying, the process details, and how to track the progress of ongoing applications. -If you want to do something for Debian but without becoming a developer, -there are several other ways in which you can help. +Please note that it is not necessary to become a developer before +contributing to Debian. It is actually much more likely that you will be +accepted if you have contributed a significant amount of work before. Packaging +software for Debian is not the only way that you can help, and in this context +not necessarily the best either. There is a lot of other work +that needs to be done that will get you accustomed to Debian, it's developers +and ways to handle things. pgpylxMvzROI5.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#202015: marked as done (Package search for "g++" broken for second and subsequent result pages)
Your message dated Mon, 21 Jul 2003 19:00:31 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#202015: Package search for "g++" broken for second and subsequent result pages has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Jul 2003 02:30:39 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 18 21:30:37 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mx1.yipes.com [209.213.199.100] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19dhUb-0001N7-00; Fri, 18 Jul 2003 21:30:37 -0500 Received: from herc.ssd.loral.com ([158.184.3.110] verified) by mx1.yipes.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.1) with ESMTP id 9454927 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 18 Jul 2003 19:30:37 -0700 Received: from ssd.loral.com ([158.184.164.39]) by herc.ssd.loral.com (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id HI92Z000.4FP for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 18 Jul 2003 19:30:36 -0700 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 19:30:36 -0700 From: "Robert Fleming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030714 Debian/1.4-2 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Package search for "g++" broken for second and subsequent result pages Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UA version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: www.debian.org Searching for packages containing files like "g++", the "+" characters are properly encoded (by the web browser) in the "word" parameter in the URL by the search form at http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages as follows: search_contents.pl?word=g%2B%2B ... but the links for subsequent search result pages look like: search_contents.pl?page=2&word=g++ ... where "g++" should be "g%2B%2B". Clicking on these links results in this error: Error: "g " is not a valid search request Sorry if this bug hasn't already posted. I only searched the bug list for keywords but did not read the whole page. --- Received: (at 202015-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jul 2003 17:11:46 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 21 12:01:01 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19ee1z-00014I-00; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 12:00:59 -0500 Received: from pd9e395b0.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.227.149.176] helo=djpig.hell) by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp (Exim 3.35) id 19ee1x-0003G6-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 19:00:58 +0200 Received: from djpig by djpig.hell with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19ee1a-0007eH-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 19:00:34 +0200 Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 19:00:31 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#202015: Package search for "g++" broken for second and subsequent result pages Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-15.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 01:43:26PM +0200, Matt Kraai wrote: > On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 01:15:44PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > tags 202015 + patch > > thanks > > > > On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 07:30:36PM -0700, Robert Fleming wrote: > > > Searching for packages containing files like "g++", the "+" characters > > > are properly encoded (by the web browser) in the "word" parameter in the > > > URL by the search form at http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages as > > > follows: > > > > > >search_contents.pl?word=g%2B%2B ... > > > > > > but t
Bug#196580: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#196580: Security Alerts -- gps)
On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 18:18, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > #196580: www.debian.org: More verbose DSA titles (for 'multiple'), > which was filed against the www.debian.org package. > > It has been closed by one of the developers, namely > Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > > Their explanation is attached below. If this explanation is > unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate > message then please contact the developer, by replying to this email. I still can't see any change at http://www.debian.org/security/2003/. The description for gps is still "multiple" and also other reports as for kernel-patch-2.4.18-powerpc and linux-kernel-2.4.18 have a description like "several". Another one: The (currently) very first security entry at the homepage http://www.debian.org/ is: "DSA-351-1 php4 -- cross-site scripting" - cross site scripting _what_? cross site scripting vulnerability? I guess there are still words getting lost somewhere. bye, Roland signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#196580: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#196580: Security Alerts -- gps)
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 07:35:00PM +0200, Roland Stigge wrote: > I still can't see any change at http://www.debian.org/security/2003/. > The description for gps is still "multiple" and also other reports as > for kernel-patch-2.4.18-powerpc and linux-kernel-2.4.18 have a > description like "several". Sorry I forgot to mention that I fixed it in CVS and that the pages will be updated in the next hours (the webpage is regenerated all four hours iirc) > Another one: The (currently) very first security entry at the homepage > http://www.debian.org/ is: "DSA-351-1 php4 -- cross-site scripting" - > cross site scripting _what_? cross site scripting vulnerability? I guess > there are still words getting lost somewhere. No, there are no words "Getting lost". The descriptions is the same as in the mail, it's actually created from it. I just thought that you were right that "multiple vulnerabilities" is more readable than just "multiple", so I added it (and it will be added in future advisories automatically). I think "cross-site scripting" is expressive enough and will not add it there. Gruesse, -- *** Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> *** *** http://www.djpig.de/ *** see also: - http://www.usta.de/ - http://fachschaft.physik.uni-karlsruhe.de/
Bug#196580: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#196580: Security Alerts -- gps)
On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 20:17, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 07:35:00PM +0200, Roland Stigge wrote: > > I still can't see any change at http://www.debian.org/security/2003/. > > The description for gps is still "multiple" and also other reports as > > for kernel-patch-2.4.18-powerpc and linux-kernel-2.4.18 have a > > description like "several". > > Sorry I forgot to mention that I fixed it in CVS and that the pages > will be updated in the next hours (the webpage is regenerated all four > hours iirc) OK, looks better now. But what about DSA-232 to DSA-243 and so on? You could possibly go over them with a script. :) bye, Roland signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
status of packages.debian.org
Hi. Just a short update. I've uploaded a snapshot version of my scripts to my webpage. You can find the link under http://www.djpig.de/projekte/debian/packages The page is in German, it's the last link on the page There is a README file in it with a very short step-by-step introduction to build the pages. Testers welcome. Gruesse, -- *** Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> *** *** http://www.djpig.de/ *** see also: - http://www.usta.de/ - http://fachschaft.physik.uni-karlsruhe.de/
