Re: Who's using Debian?

2003-04-25 Thread Andreas Tille
(I just CC the e-mail I've found at the relevant page:
Peter M. Buhr ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
 perhaps Mr. Buhr is so kind to add some information himself
 according to the page http://www.debian.org/users/ .)

"Die Zeit" (weekly newspaper), Germany

Commercial

Homepage: http://www.zeit.de

Description of technology: http://software.zeit.de/software/index
This page describes (in German language) who they use Debian, Zope and 
PostgreSQL
to manage their huge amount of articles from the past to bring it online to
their readers.

Kind regards

Andreas.

--
Mankind must put an end to war before war puts an end to mankind.
John F. Kennedy



Re: Debian WWW CVS commit by bli: webwml/german/devel/wnpp index.wml

2003-04-25 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
* Debian WWW CVS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-04-24 21:50]:
> Modified files:
>   german/devel/wnpp: index.wml 
> 
> Log message:
>   s/voraussichtlich/zukünftig/

 I'm not sure if this change is correct.  According to my dictionary
prospective means 'voraussichtlich' (expected), prospective_ly_ means
zukünftig (future).

 What is the intention of the word in english?  prospectively sounds
more enforcing that it will really be a package.  I'm not sure if I like
that change.

 Have fun,
Alfie
-- 
php ist an sich ne recht nutzlose sprache wenn da nicht soviele dinge so
einfach drin moeglich waeren
-- Getty in #debian.de


pgpOQLieu2Eaj.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Josip Rodin is unreachible or again technical problem appear ?!

2003-04-25 Thread Rumen Krasstev
I sent 3(three) messages (on sunday, wed, thu) this week to all Rodin's
accounts that I know ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED])
with changed .po files,
updated .wml's and pics, but no response accurred. Before week there was
the same problem, Rodin contact me after the fourth message
and explain me, that there is a problem with forwarding mails to his
primary mail, so I suggest this problem appear again and sending message
to this mail list is the last hope that I have to contact with him. It
sould be good if it's possible to fix this eventual technical problems,
becouse near month I tried to submit Bulgarian translation of the
Debian's web site without visible result.
Thank you for attention:
Rumen Krasstev

P.S.
I just add some past messages that I sent to him:
..
On чт, 2003-04-24 at 10:16, Rumen Krasstev wrote:
hello,
> is there problem with translations ?
> in my system, everything looks to be good..
> All .po files was sended to you two times, there should be no problem
> already with the menus as you posted in the mail list :-)
> Regards:
> Rumen Krasstev 
> 
> 
> From: Rumen Krasstev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [Fwd: Re: Debian Translation - Debian]
> Date: 23 Apr 2003 09:58:52 +0300
> 
> Just in case that you didn't recieve my mail on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> :-)
> 
> 
> From: Rumen Krasstev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Debian Translation - Debian
> Date: 21 Apr 2003 15:30:29 +0300
> 
> > > So in near feature (now I'm reading intensively Policy Manual and
New
> > > Maintainer's Guide) I would intend to become maintainer (I've
little app
> > > with graphical GUI frontend for building deb's from sources, but
it's
> > > still in alpha yet) :-)))
> > 
> > Nice. Just take your time, we don't want you to become too busy with
> > packaging, the web page translations occasionally need updating, too
:)
> > 
> You are right, the maintainer's membership can wait, translating and
> updating Debian web site is most inportrant for me, now :-)
> 
> > > I've only one simple technically question about wml's: Is it
normal that
> > > pictures, generated by the perl script (in Pics directory), have
> > > different dimensions (by mean in height) ?
> > 
> > I think that can happen when the height of individual letters
exceeds the
> > defined height of the whole picture.
> I had similar suggestion, thanks :-)
> 
> > Note also that I noticed you omitted about.bg.gif for some reason --
> > I had to insert the English about.en.gif in its place to prevent
build
> > failure.
> Excuse me, for this mistake.. I send you the missing gif and the rest
> pics, because two of them was changed
> 
> > And one more thing: how come you use CP1251? Shouldn't one of the
ISO
> > standards work better, like Unicode?
> You are right, unfortunately user mind thinks different (and
> "non-standart" have no meaning for them). Since most common users
arrive
> to Linux from Windows they used long years Windows encoding for
cyrilic
> (Russians have very similar charset - koi8-r) letters, so near 95% of
> bulgarian sites (www.dir.bg - 5 hits per day, www.linux-bg.org -
> 1 hits per day) use windows-1251 (cp1251) encoding. Furthermore on
> Linux there are no availability of UTF-8 bulgarian fonts (for
example),
> only few cyrilic (ported from Windows), so it will be hard for me to
> translate manually all documents to another encoding, and the newbies
> visiting the site, will be confused too :(
> Well, it's not make me happy but I do it for all new users, who don't
> know how beautiful is Debian, yet. So it's will be better to stay down
> cp1251 encoding for all translated pages.
> 
> P.S.
> Sorry again... i saw the messages from you in the www mailing list for
> building errors in .po files. I missed to change the encoding line,
may
> be there was the problem.. I send you fixed one and more new edited.
Now
> should be good :-)
> 

On пт, 2003-04-18 at 16:16, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 11:27:23AM +0300, Rumen Krasstev wrote:
> > > > I'm little confused, because I send you translated wml's before
week and
> > > > nothing happened, even that I didn't receive confirmation that
> > > > everything is OK ? I sending you the files again. If there is a
problem
> > > > please tell me and I'll fix what have need to fix quickly.
> > > 
> > > Ahh, now that I checked again, I saw this e-mail. I didn't find
anything
> > > from before, but this one is good. I'm very sorry for the
confusion.
> > > 
> > > I'm examining, tidying up and applying your changes right now.
> > 
> > I'm so glad for this good solution, I knew that something wrong had
> > happened between networks routers or something that. I've been ever
sure
> > that Debian is strong and solid organization with traditions and
> > wouldn't impact with him contributors :-)
> 
> Yes, we definitely support contributions, only technical problems can
> stop us :)
> 
> > So in near

Re: Debian WWW CVS commit by bli: webwml/german/devel/wnpp index.wml

2003-04-25 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 12:02:09PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> * Debian WWW CVS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-04-24 21:50]:
> > Modified files:
> > german/devel/wnpp: index.wml 
> > 
> > Log message:
> > s/voraussichtlich/zuk?nftig/
> 
>  I'm not sure if this change is correct.  According to my dictionary
> prospective means 'voraussichtlich' (expected), prospective_ly_ means
> zuk?nftig (future).
> 
>  What is the intention of the word in english?  prospectively sounds
> more enforcing that it will really be a package.  I'm not sure if I like
> that change.

My reading of the English word is something like "applying to be". So
"prospective developer" would be a valid way to describe someone in the
NM queue.

To me, "prospective packages" means "packages which may become part of
the distribution". "Future" does feel more accurate than "expected".

"Prospective" versus "prospectively" are just adjectival and adverbial
forms of the same word. I don't think you could reduce one to "expected"
and the other to "future" exclusively; both shades of meaning are there
depending on context.

-- 
Colin Watson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Who's using Debian?

2003-04-25 Thread Kaare Olsen
On Thu, 24 Apr 2003 23:36:30 -0400
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Technical Staff, artboundexpress.com, USA

The site has been added the "Who's using Debian?" list, the webpage will
be updated shortly.

Thanks for your support.

-- 
Regards, Kaare - 



Re: Package search improvements

2003-04-25 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 06:37:11PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > (On a more subjective note, perhaps we should rip swish++ out and replace it
> > with a Perl script as well. >:|)
> 
> I second this. Real subword search should be available at least for the
> package name (and perhaps the short description).

Yeah. With mod_perl, we possibly wouldn't have anything to gain from a
binary database, but just use Perl for what it's intended to do.

> And as I recall, switching to a newer swish++ version failed (?).

Yes. I upgraded to 5.1 I think, and it kept crashing.

-- 
 2. That which causes joy or happiness.



Re: Josip Rodin is unreachible or again technical problem appear ?!

2003-04-25 Thread Josip Rodin
On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 04:27:18PM +0300, Rumen Krasstev wrote:
> I sent 3(three) messages (on sunday, wed, thu) this week to all Rodin's
> accounts that I know ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> with changed .po files,
> updated .wml's and pics, but no response accurred. Before week there was
> the same problem, Rodin contact me after the fourth message
> and explain me, that there is a problem with forwarding mails to his
> primary mail, so I suggest this problem appear again and sending message
> to this mail list is the last hope that I have to contact with him.

Darn, I'll have to make an exception for you in our generic filters, your
mails often have attachments and get caught in the filters.

I'll track down the mails and reply to them individually.

-- 
 2. That which causes joy or happiness.



Bug#183735: marked as done (cvs.debian.org does not show the DDTP cvs)

2003-04-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Apr 2003 17:25:26 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line It does now
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Mar 2003 00:10:40 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 06 18:10:40 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from buzz.etsit.upm.es [138.100.17.3] 
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18r5Rf-0007vE-00; Thu, 06 Mar 2003 18:10:39 -0600
Received: (qmail 24418 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2003 00:10:07 -
Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 7 Mar 2003 00:10:07 -
Received: (qmail 24415 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2003 00:10:07 -
Received: from avalon.dat.etsit.upm.es (HELO tornado.dat.etsit.upm.es) 
(138.100.17.73)
  by buzz.etsit.upm.es with SMTP; 7 Mar 2003 00:10:07 -
Received: (qmail 845 invoked by uid 1013); 7 Mar 2003 00:10:07 -
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 01:10:07 +0100
From: Javier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fern=E1ndez-Sanguino_Pe=F1a?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: cvs.debian.org does not show the DDTP cvs
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
  USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level: 


--XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A march 7th 2003
Priority: wishlist

It would be nice if viewcvs.conf at gluck (cvs.debian.org) included the
ddtps (/cvs/ddts) so that the source code of ddtp.debian.org could be
browsed remotely.=20

Thanks

Javi

--XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE+Z+NesandgtyBSwkRAkF3AJ0Xt4nAjIip5SwbQXnZixyLY3wEDQCcDsMs
Ean44PCyAKGBvZB05nnSmV0=
=nl6T
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l--

---
Received: (at 183735-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Apr 2003 15:26:00 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 25 10:25:59 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 19955L-00015k-00; Fri, 25 Apr 2003 10:25:59 -0500
Received: from pd9e399aa.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.227.153.170] helo=djpig.hell)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp (Exim 3.35)
id 19955H-00045C-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 25 Apr 2003 17:25:57 +0200
Received: from djpig by djpig.hell with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 19954q-0007zN-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 25 Apr 2003 17:25:28 +0200
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 17:25:26 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: It does now
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.53
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Doesn't know who fixed this, but ddts is available on cvs.debian.org
via ViewCVS now.

Frank

-- 
*** Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ***
  *** http://www.djpig.de/ ***
see also: - http://www.usta.de/
  - http://fachschaft.physik.uni-karlsruhe.de/



Bug#123771: marked as done (update-excuses info from package pages)

2003-04-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Apr 2003 17:58:55 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line It is linked
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Dec 2001 02:48:18 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 12 20:48:17 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from svpal.svpal.org [209.68.147.66] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16ELuz-rP-00; Wed, 12 Dec 2001 20:48:17 -0600
Received: from svpal.svpal.org ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by svpal.svpal.org (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id fBD2ltFo025280;
Wed, 12 Dec 2001 18:47:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by svpal.svpal.org (8.12.1/8.12.1/Submit) id fBD2lsGc025279;
Wed, 12 Dec 2001 18:47:54 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 18:47:54 -0800
From: Grant Bowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: update-excuses info from package pages
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.11i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: packages.debian.org

What I do is to look for a package version with 
packages.debian.org/.  When I see there is a package in 
unstable that is not in testing yet, I look it up with a plain text 
search in my web browser on the data available at:

http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_excuses.html

Can't this information be parsed and generated so that it works similar
to the "list of files", "bug reports" and "dsc" links at the bottom of
every packages web page?  This would be tremendously helpful.

Thanks,

-- 
-- Grant Bowman   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


---
Received: (at 123771-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Apr 2003 15:59:43 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 25 10:59:43 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 1995bz-0005NZ-00; Fri, 25 Apr 2003 10:59:43 -0500
Received: from pd9e399aa.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.227.153.170] helo=djpig.hell)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp (Exim 3.35)
id 1995bv-00049q-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 25 Apr 2003 17:59:41 +0200
Received: from djpig by djpig.hell with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1995bG-00088b-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 25 Apr 2003 17:58:58 +0200
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 17:58:55 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: It is linked
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.53
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

#123771: update-excuses info from package pages 

I'm closing this one, since a link exists from the package pages to
packages.qa.d.o which contains the update-excuses output.
(And this bug is tagged moreinfo for more than a year, btw)

Frank

-- 
*** Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ***
  *** http://www.djpig.de/ ***
see also: - http://www.usta.de/
  - http://fachschaft.physik.uni-karlsruhe.de/



Re: Who's using Debian?

2003-04-25 Thread Kaare Olsen
On Fri, 25 Apr 2003 09:08:43 +0200 (CEST)
Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> (I just CC the e-mail I've found at the relevant page:
> Peter M. Buhr ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>  perhaps Mr. Buhr is so kind to add some information himself
>  according to the page http://www.debian.org/users/ .)
[...]

I've not added this yet, as I'll give Die Zeit a chance to reply first.

-- 
Regards, Kaare - 



Webstats not generated since 23 April

2003-04-25 Thread Kaare Olsen
Here's something to look into for a bored webmaster. :-)  The webstats at
http://www.debian.org/devel/website/stats/ has not been generated since 23
April:  "Created with webwml-stattrans at Wed Apr 23 07:29:23 2003 +0200".

-- 
Regards, Kaare - 



enable searching East Asian words at search.debian.org

2003-04-25 Thread Tomohiro KUBOTA
Hi,

So far search.debian.org doesn't support East Asian languages
(Chinese, Japanese, and Korean).  I.e., it cannot search Chinese,
Japanese, nor Korean words.

I have recently researched this problem and I think I found
how to fix it.  I tested at my personal machine without 24hr
internet connection and it works almost fine.

 1. install libchasen-dev, libchasen0, and ipadic packages.
 2. recompile mnogosearch (version 3.2.8 or later) with
--enable-chasen --with-extra-charsets=all option for ./configure .
 3. invoke "indexer -C" and then "indexer" to rebuild the search database.

Could someone do this?  Or, can I have a database (postgresql) access
(write access) permission at klecker to prove this?


Explanation:

Chasen packages are needed to extract words from Japanese texts.
Japanese texts don't use whitespaces between words.  --enable-chasen
(since version 3.2.8) option for mnogosearch enables usage of chasen
from mnogosearch.

Though mnogosearch is Unicode-based software and potentially supports
East Asian languages, support of these languages is disabled by default.
To enable this, --with-extra-charsets=all is needed.

Since the current search database in search.debian.org doesn't have
any east Asian words, it is needed to rebuild the whole database.
(Of course it is enough to rebuild database only for *.{ja,ko,zh-cn,
zh-hk,zh-tw}.html pages but I don't know if it is possible to this.)

---
Tomohiro KUBOTA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.debian.or.jp/~kubota/