Re: [tkubota@riken.go.jp: "On Mention in a Book" (?$B=q@R7G:\$K?(B?$B$D$$$F?(B)]

2001-11-06 Thread Brian Russo 
On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 02:39:02AM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 05, 2001 at 02:22:46PM -1000, Brian Russo wrote:
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2001/debian-www-200109/msg00254.html
>   ~~  ~~
> > This is from a Japanese publishing company, which asks us
> > to agree with that www.debian.org is introduced in their
> > book.
> [...]
> 
> I don't get it, why did you forward this back to debian-www?

Erm, I file a brain not working petition.


-- 
Unix Staff, High Energy Physics Group   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian/GNU Linux! http://www.debian.org <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Debian WWW CVS commit by alfie: webwml/german/doc ddp.wml

2001-11-06 Thread Kaare Olsen 
On Tue, 06 Nov 2001 06:36:14 -0800, Debian WWW CVS wrote:

>   german/doc : ddp.wml 
[...]
>   Fixed also the package location of the Debian-Java-FAQ
>  (can't seem to find that fix in the english file?!??)

Look for "inpackage" in user-manuals.wml, it's not in ddp,wml.

-- 
Regards, Kaare -

Você está PAGANDO PELO AR

2001-11-06 Thread peterk 
Title: Você sabe o quanto pode estar gastando






Você
sabe o quanto pode estar gastando 
pagando
pelo AR na Conta de Água?
Eliminador de Ar
para Hidrômetro - Casos comprovados de quase 40% de Economia
Economia
média de 17,7%, segundo estudo da Escola Federal de Engenharia de Itajubá, a
instituição mais conceituada do setor na América Latina.
"Tem ar no cano" - Consumidor S.A. - Edição 57
"Exclusivo: Ar pode aumentar conta de água." -
Último Segundo IG - 29/03
"Ar no cano aumenta contas de água, mas filas na Sabesp
inibem consumidor." - Último Segundo IG - 30/03
"Ar em tubulação faz conta de água disparar." -
Folha de São Paulo - 27/08
A instalação de uma válvula eliminadora de ar na
 SOPAVE
proporcionou um economia comprovada de R$  12293,00 em apenas 4 meses.
Instalado em grandes empresas como
Volkswagen do Brasil, Shopping Center Norte, Mcdonald´s, entre outras dezenas
de empresas, hotéis, residências, lavanderias, postos de gasolina,
lanchonetes, condomínios, bares, restaurantes, escritórios, etc.
Laudo do INMETRO de 04/07/2001 comprova que Eliminador de Ar
Dolphin  atende a PORTARIA INMETRO
246/2000, acabando com polemica da legalidade
de instalação das válvulas eliminadoras de ar Dolphin. TOTALMENTE
DENTRO DA LEI.
 
www.tecnicoshop.com.br/Eliminador_de_Ar/index.htm
 
 NÃO PODEMOS CONTINUAR QUIETOS DIANTE DE TAMANHO ABSURDO. NA
PRÁTICA, PAGAMOS EM MÉDIA DUAS CONTAS DE ÁGUA A MAIS POR ANO (EM MÉDIA).



Esta mensagem não pode ser considerada como SPAM, pois você
não receberá a mesma mensagem no mesmo e-mail mais de uma vez.
 

Re: Debian WWW CVS commit by alfie: webwml/german/doc ddp.wml

2001-11-06 Thread Gerfried Fuchs 
* Kaare Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-11-06 15:43]:
> On Tue, 06 Nov 2001 06:36:14 -0800, Debian WWW CVS wrote:
> 
>>  german/doc : ddp.wml 
> [...]
>>  Fixed also the package location of the Debian-Java-FAQ
>> (can't seem to find that fix in the english file?!??)
> 
> Look for "inpackage" in user-manuals.wml, it's not in ddp,wml.

 Yep, noticed when updating the user-manuals.wml - haven't thought about
multi-commit at that point, sorry.  Feel free to cvs adm edit that log
message.

 So long,
Alf*no matter which order, somethings always wrong order*ie
-- 
You can't make a foolproof thing - there is always a better fool who
will proof *you* are the fool while trying it.
  -- me, 2001-04-05

We are Now Able to Reach your Web Page

2001-11-06 Thread adam . brett 
Title: We are Now Able to Reach your Web Page



  

  We are please to inform you that we no longer have a problem in reaching your
Web page from the Philadelphia area:

  http://www.debian.org/contact

As recommended by the robot Guidelines, this email is to explain our research
activity and to alert you about the connectivity error we encountered.
InternetSeer, the world's largest web site  monitoring service, does not store or
publish the content of your pages, but rather uses the 
information to update our ongoing Web Connectivity Study.

To learn more about our study results or request InternetSeer to continue
monitoring your Web site and sending you error messages visit,
click here.

If you prefer not to receive these occasional error notices please let us know
by replying to this email and placing "remove" in the subject line. You will be
removed from receiving further email error notices.

Adam Brett 
Analyst Manager 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
InternetSeer.com "Your Remote Web Site Monitor"
http://www.internetseer.com

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

I love chatty virus scanners

2001-11-06 Thread Craig Small 
We get one SirCam email, my postfix server detects it, drops it, no
problem.

The we get 2 million emails saying that we (not the sender) have a virus.
Might as well get the bloody virus.

  - Craig
-- 
Craig Small VK2XLZ  GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE  95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5
Eye-Net Consulting http://www.eye-net.com.au/<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIEEE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

new patent for you

2001-11-06 Thread info 

Dear Sirs,
We  would like to offer you the following patented solutions  that
might interest you.

1)METHOD  FOR  RENTING SOFTWARE PRODUCTS AND OTHER  ELECTRONIC
DATA  (AUDIO, VIDEO, ETC.) Priority date - 16.03.2001. This method
allows  a  user  to use software products and electronic  data  in
exchange for processing advertising information. A fee for the use
of  software  products (audio/video files) will be paid  to  their
owners   on  the  expense  of  advertisers  who  pay  for  viewing
advertising  by a user. This method does not involve  a  permanent
connection  to  a  remote resource and extends a range  of  rental
software  products. The novelty of the invention consists  in  the
method  of providing a user with advertising information  and  the
way  of settling accounts between an advertiser and an owner of  a
software product (or audio/video files).
A  distribution  center for software and electronic  data  can  be
created  on the basis of this method, which will attract  a  great
number  of software developers and users. This fact will  increase
the  volume  of advertising information and provide  its  targeted
delivery. This fact will also interest big advertisers.

2)METHOD  FOR  WORKING WITH LISTS OF LINKS.  Priority  date  -
15.02.2001.   This  method  makes  it  possible   to   work   with
heterogeneous links (for example, web links, links to files stored
on  a  local  computer, links to records in a corporate  database,
etc).  Logical operations can be applied to lists of  links.  This
method also allows a user to specify new formats of links and  add
new  operations that will be performed on lists. These  and  other
capabilities  of  this  invention  allow  economizing   time   for
processing information and they can be applied both while  working
on the Internet and with office applications and local data.
Any  search  operation results in creating  a  list  of  links  to
information  sources.  As a rule, a user conducts  several  search
operations  and  it  is  ineffective sometimes  to  perform  these
operations  separately.  The  possibility  to  carry  out  logical
operations on lists (merging, coincidence and difference checking)
allows optimizing information processing.
The  practical application this and other features of the  present
invention is effective in the following fields:
   -  Online  services  intended to store  and  process  lists  of
heterogeneous  links.  The advantages over existing  analogs  will
attract a new category of users.
   -  The possibility allowing a user to process results (lists of
links)  will  increase  the  length  of  work  session  with  your
resources.
   -  Integration  into  application  systems  will  extend  their
functionality.
   - Integration into databases will reduce response time of a
  system and speed up data processing.
   
3)METHOD  OF METASEARCH. Priority date - 15.02.2001.  Existing
meta-search systems have a number of disadvantages (in particular,
a  little  set  of search capabilities), which makes users  access
directly search resources and as a result restricts an audience of
users.  Our  method makes it possible to use all search parameters
of  each  search  engines  used in meta-search  and  extend  their
capabilities  due  to  search  query preprocessing.  Besides,  our
invention  allows  uses to add new search engines  for  conducting
meta-search. This new method can use simultaneously both local and
remote  resources.  These  and other  advantages  of  the  present
invention will allow users to avoid disadvantages of existing meta-
search systems and make the search process on the Internet easier,
which will result in increasing the number of users.

4)METHOD  FOR A DEFERRED RETRIEVAL AND DISPLAYING  INFORMATION
FROM  REMOTE  RESOURCES. Priority date - 15.02.2001.  This  method
erases  the distinction between information processing  in  online
and  offline modes. The user will not have to interrupt  the  main
work for viewing information found while surfing the Web. Besides,
this  method  also optimizes the process of retrieving information
from remote resources. The invention makes it possible to increase
the  amount of advertising information viewed by the user and  its
efficiency.
   The  use  of this method extends the range of software products
promoted  on  adware  basis  (not  only  Internet-oriented  ones),
because they can be used without a permanent connection to  remote
resources.  The creation of a specialized software  product  using
this method will allow Internet advertising agencies (paying users
for  processing online advertising, banners, etc) to increase  the
efficiency of advertising campaign.

5)METHOD OF SEARCHING FOR DOCUMENTS OR THEIR FRAGMENTS SIMILAR
BY  TEXT  AND SEMANTIC CONTENTS. Priority date - 06.04.2001.  This
method  solves  the  problem connected  with  searching  for  both
identical  and similar documents and their fragments  among  large
arrays of unstruct

Bug#113252: marked as done (At the bottom of the page it says "You can also *search* the archives"...)

2001-11-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Tue, 6 Nov 2001 23:38:41 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Sep 2001 16:35:40 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 23 11:35:40 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail5.svr.pol.co.uk [195.92.193.20] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15lCEF-0001LB-00; Sun, 23 Sep 2001 11:35:39 -0500
Received: from modem-345.babbelas.dialup.pol.co.uk ([62.25.133.89] 
helo=localhost)
by mail5.svr.pol.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #0)
id 15lCEA-r0-00; Sun, 23 Sep 2001 17:35:34 +0100
Received: from karl by localhost with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 15lCDg-f2-00; Sun, 23 Sep 2001 17:35:04 +0100
From: "Karl E. Jorgensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: At the bottom of the page it says "You can also *search* the 
archives"...
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.16
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.16
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 17:35:04 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: listarchives
Version: N/A; reported 2001-09-23
Severity: minor

And it contains a hyperlink back to itself. Confusing, as it infers that 
you're not looking at the page for searching archives...

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux einstein 2.2.19 #2 Wed May 30 18:57:48 BST 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C


---
Received: (at 113252-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Nov 2001 21:28:33 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 06 15:28:33 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cibalia.gkvk.hr [161.53.211.3] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 161Dlp-0001qC-00; Tue, 06 Nov 2001 15:28:33 -0600
Received: from joy by cibalia.gkvk.hr with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 161Erh-0006bw-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 06 Nov 2001 23:38:41 +0100
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 23:38:41 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fixed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
From: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi,

The lists.debian.org/search.html page no longer links to itself.

Thanks for reporting.

-- 
 2. That which causes joy or happiness.

Processed: that's really wishlist, the list isn't archived here

2001-11-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 49685 wishlist
Bug#49685: list index should contain a pointer to debian-user-de
Severity set to `wishlist'.

> --
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#62815: marked as done (listarchives: does not list gnomehack list)

2001-11-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Wed, 7 Nov 2001 00:00:57 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gnomehack list was removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Apr 2000 21:08:09 +
Received: (qmail 2643 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2000 21:08:09 -
Received: from smtp-rt-12.wanadoo.fr (HELO tamaris.wanadoo.fr) (@193.252.19.60)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 21 Apr 2000 21:08:09 -
Received: from antholoma.wanadoo.fr (193.252.19.153) by tamaris.wanadoo.fr; 21 
Apr 2000 23:08:04 +0200
Received: from bylbo.nowhere.earth (213.56.235.249) by antholoma.wanadoo.fr; 21 
Apr 2000 23:07:57 +0200
Received: from dwitch by bylbo.nowhere.earth with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 12imWu-00067a-00; Sat, 22 Apr 2000 01:08:08 +0200
From: dwitch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: listarchives: does not list gnomehack list
X-Reportbug-Version: 0.54
X-Mailer: reportbug 0.54
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2000 01:08:08 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Package: listarchives
Version: N/A; reported 2000-04-22
Severity: normal

...and thus possibly other ones.  This list is scanned for maintainer
activity, as reflected in the LDAP pages, so I guess it should be
accessible ?

-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux bylbo 2.2.14 #1 ven fév 18 01:46:31 CET 2000 i586

---
Received: (at 62815-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Nov 2001 21:50:51 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 06 15:50:51 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cibalia.gkvk.hr [161.53.211.3] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 161E7N-0002Zq-00; Tue, 06 Nov 2001 15:50:51 -0600
Received: from joy by cibalia.gkvk.hr with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 161FDF-0006fi-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 07 Nov 2001 00:00:57 +0100
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 00:00:57 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gnomehack list was removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
From: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi,

Looks like the other-gnomehack list was removed, so this request is now
invalid.

-- 
 2. That which causes joy or happiness.

Bug#62815: Should the gnomehack list be archived?

2001-11-06 Thread Josip Rodin 
Hi,

There is a request in the bug tracking system to archive the gnomehack
mailing list at http://lists.debian.org/ , but the reasoning is pretty weak.

Should this really be done?

-- 
 2. That which causes joy or happiness.

Processed: retitle

2001-11-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> retitle 102344 searching for "~something~" and for URLs makes glimpse crash
Bug#102344: Bug in glimpse (lists.debian.org/search.html)
Changed Bug title.

> --
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: it's wishlist

2001-11-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> retitle 48601 should display certain PGP-signed messages instead of linking 
> to them
Bug#48601: Signed messages not displayed in list archive
Changed Bug title.

> severity 48601 wishlist
Bug#48601: should display certain PGP-signed messages instead of linking to them
Severity set to `wishlist'.

> --
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#112544: marked as done (Search: selecting nothing on Date Filter fails)

2001-11-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Tue, 6 Nov 2001 23:43:52 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Appears to be working now
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Sep 2001 13:10:39 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 17 08:10:39 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kokoro.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp (lilac) [130.54.16.13] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15iyAZ-000150-00; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 08:10:39 -0500
Received: from dpt by lilac with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian))
id 15iyAa-0004V2-00; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 22:10:40 +0900
From: Dylan Thurston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Search: selecting nothing on Date Filter fails
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.28
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.28
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 22:10:40 +0900
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: listarchives
Version: N/A; reported 2001-09-17
Severity: normal

On the search page, the list filter help reads

List filter
Selecting nothing will search debian-user.

and the date filter reads

Date filter
Selecting nothing will search the most recent quarter.

However, both comments ("Selecting nothing...") seem to be false; I
get an error message

No archives match that combination of lists and dates.

Please either add back the default or remove the confusing comment.

Best,
Dylan Thurston

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux lilac 2.4.7 #2 Mon Jul 23 18:37:43 EDT 2001 i586
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=


---
Received: (at 112544-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Nov 2001 21:33:43 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 06 15:33:43 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cibalia.gkvk.hr [161.53.211.3] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 161Dqp-0001w8-00; Tue, 06 Nov 2001 15:33:43 -0600
Received: from joy by cibalia.gkvk.hr with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 161Ewi-0006cX-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 06 Nov 2001 23:43:52 +0100
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 23:43:52 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Appears to be working now
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
From: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi,

Leaving the list and date unset on lists.debian.org/search.html does seem to
search the latest quarter of debian-user.

(Maybe I fixed this with the rest of the bugs I fixed a couple of months
back...)

-- 
 2. That which causes joy or happiness.

Bug#31137: marked as done (pgp-signed messages don't show up correctly)

2001-11-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Tue, 6 Nov 2001 23:50:10 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Dec 1998 23:21:41 +
Received: (qmail 16063 invoked from network); 25 Dec 1998 23:21:41 -
Received: from 1cust4.tnt7.lax1.da.uu.net (HELO femto) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 25 Dec 1998 23:21:41 -
Received: from maor by femto with local (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian))
id 0ztgY7-cT-00; Fri, 25 Dec 1998 15:21:39 -0800
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: pgp-signed messages don't show up correctly
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.108)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
 boundary="Multipart_Fri_Dec_25_15:21:39_1998-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Guy Maor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 25 Dec 1998 15:21:39 -0800
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 34
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/XEmacs 20.4 - "Emerald"

--Multipart_Fri_Dec_25_15:21:39_1998-1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

Package: listarchives



--Multipart_Fri_Dec_25_15:21:39_1998-1
Content-Type: message/rfc822

Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1998 10:24:37 -0600
From: Matthew Cashdollar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: web-based debian mailing list archive bug
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: RF Communications, Inc.  http://www.rfcinc.com

You may already know this (I didn't see it in the bug database), but
PGP-signed messages aren't showing up correctly on the www.debian.org
mailing list archives.  See:

http://www.debian.org/Lists-Archives/debian-devel-9812/msg01414.html

for an example of what I mean.

Keep up the good work!

Happy holidays,
-Matt


--Multipart_Fri_Dec_25_15:21:39_1998-1--
---
Received: (at 31137-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Nov 2001 21:40:01 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 06 15:40:01 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cibalia.gkvk.hr [161.53.211.3] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 161Dwv-00027n-00; Tue, 06 Nov 2001 15:40:01 -0600
Received: from joy by cibalia.gkvk.hr with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 161F2o-0006dM-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 06 Nov 2001 23:50:10 +0100
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 23:50:10 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fixed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
From: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi,

Like you (Guy) said in a followup to this bug, the PGP signed messages
appear correctly in the Debian list archives. Since this bug was filed,
the mentioned archives for 1998 were gzipped, and I've regenerated the
whole archive.

So, the bug can be closed! :)

-- 
 2. That which causes joy or happiness.

Bug#82852: marked as done (DWN index for each year needs to depend on all the issues for that year)

2001-11-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Wed, 7 Nov 2001 00:36:51 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Jan 2001 14:06:10 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 19 08:06:09 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gsyc.escet.urjc.es [:::212.128.1.45] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14JcB5-0006zN-00; Fri, 19 Jan 2001 08:06:08 -0600
Received: from cacharro.escet.urjc.es ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [212.128.1.44])
by gsyc.escet.urjc.es (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id 
PAA16628;
Fri, 19 Jan 2001 15:05:52 +0100
X-Authentication-Warning: gsyc.escet.urjc.es: Host [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[212.128.1.44] claimed to be cacharro.escet.urjc.es
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by cacharro.escet.urjc.es (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id PAA01109;
Fri, 19 Jan 2001 15:08:22 +0100
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 15:08:22 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: www.debian.org: Some automatic indexes not being properly generated in 
Spanish translations
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.2.10
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: www.debian.org
Version: 20010119
Severity: grave

There are some automatic indexes in the Spanish translation of DWN which are 
not generated
correctly. However, the source WML pages are commited, and to me (I'm one of 
the coordinators
of the Spanish translation) they look ok.

For instance, in http://www.debian.org/News/weekly/2001/index.es.html only 
entries in English are available (although the corresponding Spanish pages 
are available)

In http://www.debian.org/News/weekly/index.es.html, only some of the 2001
issues are referneced, and only in English.

On the other hand, http://www.debian.org/News/weekly/2001/1/index.es.html
and http://www.debian.org/News/weekly/2001/2/index.es.html are ok.

I've talked about this to Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Peña, and he also
doesn't know how to fix it.

-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Kernel Version: Linux cacharro 2.2.15 #2 Fri Sep 22 14:35:10 CEST 2000 i586 
unknown


---
Received: (at 82852-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Nov 2001 22:26:42 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 06 16:26:42 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cibalia.gkvk.hr [161.53.211.3] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 161Eg5-0003yQ-00; Tue, 06 Nov 2001 16:26:42 -0600
Received: from joy by cibalia.gkvk.hr with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 161Flz-0006kk-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 07 Nov 2001 00:36:51 +0100
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 00:36:51 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Closing
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
From: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi,

Apart from the small bug in make we had to work around, this problem is
resolved, so I'm closing the bug.

-- 
 2. That which causes joy or happiness.

Bug#113683: marked as done (Stormix and Rebel.com links on Partners page)

2001-11-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Wed, 7 Nov 2001 00:42:11 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Sep 2001 11:25:21 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 27 06:25:21 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.kemi.dtu.dk [130.225.67.150] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15mZI9-0007lx-00; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 06:25:21 -0500
Received: from ouabain.ok.dtu.dk (tr4.ok.dtu.dk [192.38.70.74])
by mail.kemi.dtu.dk (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f8RBOh322631
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 13:24:44 +0200
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=tr4.ok.dtu.dk)
by ouabain.ok.dtu.dk with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 15mZHW-0002Mu-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 13:24:42 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Stormix and Rebel.com links on Partners page
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 13:24:38 +0200
From: Malcolm Gillies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: www.debian.org
Version: 2001-09-27
Severity: normal

A number of the links on the "Partners" page

http://www.debian.org/partners/

appear to be out of date. AFAIK both Stormix and rebel.com are out
of business, and I'm not sure how healthy Corel Linux is these days.

cheers,

Malcolm

---
Received: (at 113683-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Nov 2001 22:31:58 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 06 16:31:58 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cibalia.gkvk.hr [161.53.211.3] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 161ElC-00049l-00; Tue, 06 Nov 2001 16:31:58 -0600
Received: from joy by cibalia.gkvk.hr with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 161Fr9-0006m6-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 07 Nov 2001 00:42:11 +0100
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 00:42:11 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fixed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
From: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi,

The links to Stormix and Rebel.com were removed from the Debian partners
page, and replaced with some new things.

Thanks for reporting.

-- 
 2. That which causes joy or happiness.

Bug#109068: marked as done (DDP document is shown in the wrong language)

2001-11-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Wed, 7 Nov 2001 00:40:20 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Aug 2001 20:51:23 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 17 15:51:23 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pc104-60.oslo.avidi.no (tuli) [148.122.60.104] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15XqaR-0006NC-00; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 15:51:23 -0500
Received: from perkele ([10.1.1.1])
by tuli with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 15XqaK-0001f4-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 22:51:16 +0200
Received: by perkele (Postfix, from userid 501)
id 89C1625032; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 22:51:12 +0200 (CEST)
From: peter karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: DDP document is shown in the wrong language
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.21
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.21
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 22:51:12 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2001-08-17
Severity: normal

http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/ gives me the German version,
even though I would like to have the English version according to my
Accept-Language setting:

HTTP_ACCEPT_LANGUAGE=sv,nb,no,da,nn,en,de

It seems as if there is only an index.html, and no index.en.html, and thus
the server thinks that there is no English version available, and instead
serves me the German version, which I have given lower priority than the
English.


---
Received: (at 109068-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Nov 2001 22:30:11 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 06 16:30:11 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cibalia.gkvk.hr [161.53.211.3] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 161EjT-00040n-00; Tue, 06 Nov 2001 16:30:11 -0600
Received: from joy by cibalia.gkvk.hr with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 161FpM-0006lY-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 07 Nov 2001 00:40:20 +0100
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 00:40:20 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fixed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
From: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi,

After setting up the maint-guide makefile to name English files properly and
make links for index.html and stuff, this works properly:

% wget -O - --header="Accept-Language: sv,nb,no,da,nn,en,de" 
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/ | head
--23:29:16--  http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/
   => `-'
Connecting to www.debian.org:80... connected!
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 3,493 [text/html]

0K ..







Debian New Maintainers' Guide

.   100% @   7,27 KB/s

23:29:18 (7,27 KB/s) - `-' saved [3493/3493]

Thanks for reporting.

-- 
 2. That which causes joy or happiness.

Bug#76003: DMUP lacking guidelines section

2001-11-06 Thread Josip Rodin 
You wrote:
> Package: www.debian.org
> Version: 2000-11-01
> Severity: normal
>
> The DMUP (at http://www.debian.org/devel/dmup) says that
>
> "This document contains two parts: policies and guidelines."
>
> There is no guidelines section.

Well, maybe it's a bit poorly worded, but there are policies and guidelines
in the document.

What should we do?

-- 
 2. That which causes joy or happiness.

Bug#114214: marked as done (The proposed java policy have now moved.)

2001-11-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Wed, 7 Nov 2001 00:46:34 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Oct 2001 15:37:05 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 02 10:37:05 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from p242.linnet.nu (chrystal.opal.dhs.org) [62.13.47.242] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15oRbU-0003MZ-00; Tue, 02 Oct 2001 10:37:04 -0500
Received: from ola by chrystal.opal.dhs.org with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 15oRbO-00065e-00; Tue, 02 Oct 2001 17:36:58 +0200
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 17:36:58 +0200
From: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: debian-java@lists.debian.org
Subject: The proposed java policy have now moved.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mail-Followup-To: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
debian-java@lists.debian.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Sender: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: www.debian.org

Hi

As the new maintainer I have now finally had the time to
change the policy acording to the discussions on the java
mailinglist.

Because the previous policy was on bortz accound I have to
move it to a new location
http://people.debian.org/~opal/java/policy.html

So the link from www.debian.org/devel should be changed acordingly.

Hints on how to make this page (automaticly, no manual changes each
time please) look like the other official pages
are appriciated. Bortz used docbook but I can not find out how
he created the web version. So now I have the same html version
as the one in java-common.

Regards,

// Ola

PS: Folks on debian-java are welcome to read it though and make
comments. :)
DS.

-- 
 - Ola Lundqvist ---
/  [EMAIL PROTECTED] Björnkärrsgatan 5 A.11   \
|  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 584 36 LINKÖPING |
|  +46 (0)13-17 69 83  +46 (0)70-332 1551   |
|  http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
\  gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36  4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
 ---

---
Received: (at 114214-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Nov 2001 22:36:23 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 06 16:36:23 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cibalia.gkvk.hr [161.53.211.3] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 161EpR-0004Gx-00; Tue, 06 Nov 2001 16:36:23 -0600
Received: from joy by cibalia.gkvk.hr with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 161FvO-0006n3-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 07 Nov 2001 00:46:34 +0100
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 00:46:34 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fixed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
From: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi,

I updated the links to the proposed Java policy. (Commited to CVS; should
appear on the web site soon.)

Thanks for reporting.

-- 
 2. That which causes joy or happiness.

Bug#117050: What do we do?

2001-11-06 Thread Josip Rodin 
Hi,

So how do we get the favicon.ico back in shape?

-- 
 2. That which causes joy or happiness.

Processed: patch

2001-11-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 116936 patch
Bug#116936: [PATCH]: cvs.debian.org instructions confusing
Tags added: patch

> --
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#117032: marked as done (www.debian.org: Last wml build of www.debian.org/doc/admin-manual not successful)

2001-11-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Wed, 7 Nov 2001 00:47:44 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Oct 2001 10:58:08 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 25 05:58:08 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from buzz.etsit.upm.es [138.100.17.60] (qmailr)
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15wiD7-0005ML-00; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 05:58:06 -0500
Received: (qmail 27634 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2001 10:57:29 -
Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 25 Oct 2001 10:57:29 -
Received: (qmail 27631 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2001 10:57:24 -
Received: from avalon.dat.etsit.upm.es (138.100.17.15)
  by buzz.etsit.upm.es with SMTP; 25 Oct 2001 10:57:24 -
Received: (qmail 1914 invoked by uid 1013); 25 Oct 2001 10:57:24 -
Date: 25 Oct 2001 10:57:24 -
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: www.debian.org: Last wml build of www.debian.org/doc/admin-manual not 
successful
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: www.debian.org
Version: 20011025
Severity: normal


It seems that the latest rebuild of w.d.o has not worked properly
with http://www.debian.org/doc/admin-manuals. If you take a look at the
HTML source it seems that the WML entities have not been translated.
However, a build of the current (updated) CVS version of that same
document yields a proper HTML document. 
Please force a rebuild for that page.

Thanks

Javi


-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux avalon 2.4.10 #1 sáb sep 29 19:13:19 CEST 2001 i686 
unknown


---
Received: (at 117032-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Nov 2001 22:37:32 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 06 16:37:32 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cibalia.gkvk.hr [161.53.211.3] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 161Eqa-0004Hd-00; Tue, 06 Nov 2001 16:37:32 -0600
Received: from joy by cibalia.gkvk.hr with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 161FwW-0006nE-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 07 Nov 2001 00:47:44 +0100
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 00:47:44 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fixed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
From: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi,

Both English and Spanish versions of /doc/admin-manuals seem to be built
correctly now, so I'm closing this bug.

-- 
 2. That which causes joy or happiness.

Usability review of debian.org?

2001-11-06 Thread Jeff 

I'm an engineer with a Linux background who is working on starting a
career in usability and human factors.  I was wondering if people thought
it would be useful for me to take a close look at Debian's web site and
make some recommendations.

-Jeff