Re: Big Mistake !!

2001-09-24 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
Hi!

On Fri, Sep 21, 2001, Christophe Delpierre wrote:
> Hello , Sir
> 
> pardon my poor english but i Tried !

 No problem there, your intention is quite clear.

> I ve make a big mistake i want just send this email to the employed of
> the company !!  :-(((

 Well, It could have been a mistake or intentionally, you could tell us
whatever you like.  What's the truth is most of the times something in
between.

> I Know a lot of people have a fun  of this mistake and it's good , It's
> a good Joke but now my boss have find it with google  8-(( !!
> Google is very good !

 Yes, google is good.  And it was always clear that our mailing-lists
are archived publically, for history, for beeing able to search for
problem solutions and so on.

> Can you please remove this email to the archive !!

 No, we don't do such things.  Removing your mail would make Christian
Marillants reply quite senseless in the archive, wouldn't it?  You sent
the mail to the list, it's there, and we won't change the history.  It
was never a secret that our lists are archived, and people sending there
have by that agreed with it, like an almost all mailinglists that are
there available around the globe.  Otherwise they shouldn't mail the
list.

> Thank's

 Thanks for your understanding,
Gerfried Fuchs
[part of the project, but no authority]
P.S.: This mail was also archived, for listarchives is a synonym for
  
-- 
 You never learn anything  |   /"\   ,'~~.
   by doing it right.  |  / chaos \  alfie.ist.org   |o ?~\
   -- unknown  |  \inside!/  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /_   ~<\
   |   \_/   \__,~ \>



Re: check_trans.pl broken - please fix

2001-09-24 Thread Denis Barbier
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 10:24:24PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 10:19:17PM +0200, peter karlsson wrote:
> > Denis Barbier:
> > 
> > > It works for me.
> > > Make sure your Perl/Local/Cvsinfo.pm is recent enough, 1.3 should work.
> > 
> > All the files are at the current version.
> [...]
> 
> Could you send the content of your CVS/Root and CVS/Repository files?

For the record, Peter sent me requested informations and I fixed a bug in
Perl/Local/Cvsinfo.pm

Denis



Re: CVS webwml/template

2001-09-24 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* Peter Karlsson

| Added Norwegian translation of the front page. It is done by me, the Swedish
| translator, so it might be a bit too like the Swedish translation. Hopefully
| anyone who objects to it will comment.

Looks OK to me.

-- 

Tollef Fog Heen
You Can't Win



Mistake !!

2001-09-24 Thread Christophe Delpierre
Hi !

pardon my poor english but i Tried !

he as a few month ago i've send a email to debian-french
debian-french@lists.debian.org  mailing liste the subject
was :

ARRET DES SERVICES WEB ET MAIL

testing of  traduction hum !! STOP INTERNET  AND MAIL :-(

I' ve make a big mistake i want just send this email to the employed of
the company !!  :-(((

I Know a lot of people have a fun  of this mistake and it's good , It's
a good Joke but now my boss have find it with google  8-(( !!
Google is very good !

Can you please remove this email to the archive !! or if you can't, can
you just remove the list of the employed in field TO:
I Think's this list don't interrest the debian'user.

This the URL :
http://lists.debian.org/debian-french/2000/debian-french-27/msg00210.html

Thanks for your understanding,

Christophe Delpierre



mnoGoSearch - and the navigation

2001-09-24 Thread Christian Holzberger
hello,
i saw that the mngosearch dont work as it should :)
it displays the "select a server near u" stuff on each search result,
here is a little perl script that should fix that stuff (perhaps it dont
outputs 100% good html but for the indexer it makes no difference) :
u have to add the following line to the indexer.conf
Mime text/* text/html "however_u_name_this_script.pl" 
-- 
| Name   : Christian Holzberger   |   
| E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 
| URL: www.Linux-Coding.org   | 
#!/usr/bin/perl

use strict;

my $blob;
{
local $/;
$blob = <>;
}
$blob =~ 
m!<(title)>(.*?).*?(.*)!is;

if ( $2 && $4 ) {
print "$2$4\n";
} else {
print $blob;
}



pgp6njLDVHS4q.pgp
Description: PGP signature


search for files in packages

2001-09-24 Thread Olivier Ricou
Hi,

 I spend a long part of my night to find the package with the
file named gnome-config. I looked everywhere and especially
in the http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages page, but
only in the "Search Package Directories" since the next
section "Search the Contents of the Latest Release" was
irrelevant for me (I supposed so). 

 Now a friend showed me how to do and I have the answer I was
looking for. But I'm sure I'm not the only one who looks for
a special file, try to find in which package it is, and just
look in the Search Package section. So what would you think
to add a third choice for the "Search on" in this section ?
We would have 

Search on: ( ) Package names only ( ) Descriptions (x) Files

 The Graal would be to have just one interface. With all the default
choice it would be as simple to use as rpmfind, a engine which
searches in all the descriptions of the packages, files included.
For advanced users it should keep the options as it is now.

 Last, maybe the form should be in the top of the page.

Thanks for your work,

Olivier.



Re: search for files in packages

2001-09-24 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001, Olivier Ricou wrote:
>  I spend a long part of my night to find the package with the
> file named gnome-config. I looked everywhere and especially
> in the http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages page, but
> only in the "Search Package Directories" since the next
> section "Search the Contents of the Latest Release" was
> irrelevant for me (I supposed so). 

 No, exactly this search would have been the thing you looked for.
Please take a look at the description:

| This search engine allows you to search the contents of Debian distributions
| for any files (or just parts of file names) that are part of packages.

 It states quite clearly that it's for file-search.  What part was
misleading to you?  Maybe we could update the wording to make it more
clear.

> Search on: ( ) Package names only ( ) Descriptions (x) Files
> 
>  The Graal would be to have just one interface. With all the default

 It is not really possible to do it in just a single form - there are
different options for that two searches, and it would confuse the people
and may make them think that there is a difference in the package
descriptions for the different architectures, or on the other hand that
the section could have influence on a file search.

 That would just confuse the people even more.

>  Last, maybe the form should be in the top of the page.

 That could be right, I guess.  On the other hand, it's not my job to
decide that, personally I think at least a  link
at the top to the search forms would be great to help the people scroll
down.

 Thanks,
Alfie
-- 
 You never learn anything  |   /"\   ,'~~.
   by doing it right.  |  / chaos \  alfie.ist.org   |o ?~\
   -- unknown  |  \inside!/  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /_   ~<\
   |   \_/   \__,~ \>



Re: mnoGoSearch - and the navigation

2001-09-24 Thread peter karlsson
Christian Holzberger:

> i saw that the mngosearch dont work as it should :)
> it displays the "select a server near u" stuff on each search result,

They should be enclosed by the  stuff, just like the
language list. I have been meaning to fix that, but haven't come round to
yet.

-- 
\\//
peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/

  Statement concerning unsolicited e-mail according to Swedish law:
  http://www.softwolves.pp.se/peter/reklampost.html



Re: search for files in packages

2001-09-24 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
Hi!

On Mon, Sep 24, 2001, Olivier Ricou wrote:
> Well, I should have tried before sending my last mail. I don't know
> if it is possible to change a form by clicking on a radio button
> (the Search on File one).
> 
> Maybe what you could do is just a link in the first form :
> 
> Search on: ( ) Package names only ( ) Descriptions  Files
> -
> Where Files is a link to the next form. That's easy to add.

 That's a good sugguestion, and seems reasonable.  I hope you are not
angry with me mailing this private mail from you back to the
mailing-list?

 Thanks,
Alfie
-- 
 You never learn anything  |   /"\   ,'~~.
   by doing it right.  |  / chaos \  alfie.ist.org   |o ?~\
   -- unknown  |  \inside!/  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /_   ~<\
   |   \_/   \__,~ \>



new check_trans.pl

2001-09-24 Thread Martin Quinson
Hello,

I just commited a new version of this script, which merge what I had
locally and what could be found in the cvs. This adds the -t option, to get
the 'translated diff'. Just try it, you'll see what it is.

I've tested it locally, and I think it's ok, but I can't be sure it will
work on every version of perl. Please test it, and repport any breakage so
that I can fix it.

Thanks for your patience, Mt.

-- 
Un clavier azerty en vaut deux.



Re: bad link on www.debian.org

2001-09-24 Thread Martin Schulze
Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 05:51:41PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > > http://www.debian.org/ports/sparc/ has a link near the bottom of the page;
> > > 
> > > "Linux/SPARC News -- a very up-to-date page by Justin Maurer"
> > > 
> > > However this link is not found, unfortunatley I could not work out where 
> > > it was supposed to point.
> > 
> > I've removed it, looks like the user mike911 was removed entirely
> > from that server.
> 
> I noticed the same thing ages ago, but I first mailed Justin Maurer, who is
> a Debian developer, to ask about it. Apparently, he didn't reply and I
> forgot about it. :/

This kind of problem is described here:


Regards,

Joey

-- 
No question is too silly to ask, but, of course, some are too silly
to answer.   -- Perl book



Re: Debian WWW CVS: joy

2001-09-24 Thread Martin Schulze
Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 06:46:24PM +0200, peter karlsson wrote:
> > BTW, could you please put the lists.cfg file in the CVS?
> 
> Er, no, what's the point? It's not our file, and it's accessible otherwise
> (http://murphy.debian.org/lists.cfg).

Having it in CVS is always a good idea since that will make modification
visible quite simple.  Apart from that, if the file is required for building
the website it should be in the webwml cvs - but I've said that before ...

Regards,

Joey

-- 
No question is too silly to ask, but, of course, some are too silly
to answer.   -- Perl book



Re: [patch] Let wml::debian::translation-check line be anywhere

2001-09-24 Thread Martin Schulze
Denis Barbier wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> the wml::debian::translation-check currently prints its output where it
> is called from; this may give strange results on some files if this line
> appears at the top of the file, which is surely the most intuitive
> location.
> 
> This patch diverts translation-check's output into a buffer which must
> then be declared in all templates (I may have forgotten some).
> 
> I did not commit it since I am not sure everybody likes their template
> being changed without agreement.

Just to let you know, I *really* like this idea/patch since it is more
intuitive to handle.  If I had to say anything, I'd say "go".

Regards,

Joey

-- 
No question is too silly to ask, but, of course, some are too silly
to answer.   -- Perl book



Re: CVS webwml/english/template/debian

2001-09-24 Thread Martin Schulze
Debian CVS barbier wrote:
> Update of /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/template/debian
> In directory klecker:/tmp/cvs-serv24335
> 
> Modified Files:
>   consultant.wml ddp.wml event.wml mainpage.wml news.wml 
>   past_event.wml template.wml translation-check.wml votebar.wml 
> Log Message:
> Add a trailing slash for WML empty elements.
> HTML tags have not been changed.
> 
> 
> --- /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/template/debian/consultant.wml 2001/09/02 
> 19:36:12 1.43
> +++ /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/template/debian/consultant.wml 2001/09/02 
> 20:07:54 1.44
> @@ -54,22 +54,22 @@
>  # DO NOT translate anything below this line. If you feel something needs to
>  # be modified, first write to debian-www list.
>  
> -#use wml::debian::basic SUMMARY="$(SUMMARY)" title=""
> +#use wml::debian::basic SUMMARY="$(SUMMARY)" title=""
>  #use wml::debian::languages
>  
>  {#check_trans#}
>  
>  {#mainbody#}
>  
> -
> +
>  
> -
> +
>  
><:= languages() :>
>  ">
>  
> -
> +
>  
>  #use wml::debian::footer NOCOMMENTS="yes" NOCOPYRIGHT="yes"

[...]

Would you mind adding a small explanation why this change is required?

Regards,

Joey

-- 
No question is too silly to ask, but, of course, some are too silly
to answer.   -- Perl book



Re: CVS webwml/english/template/debian

2001-09-24 Thread Denis Barbier
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 07:53:19PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Debian CVS barbier wrote:
> > Update of /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/template/debian
> > In directory klecker:/tmp/cvs-serv24335
> > 
> > Modified Files:
> > consultant.wml ddp.wml event.wml mainpage.wml news.wml 
> > past_event.wml template.wml translation-check.wml votebar.wml 
> > Log Message:
> > Add a trailing slash for WML empty elements.
> > HTML tags have not been changed.
[...]
> > -
> > +
> >  
> >  #use wml::debian::footer NOCOMMENTS="yes" NOCOPYRIGHT="yes"
> 
> [...]
> 
> Would you mind adding a small explanation why this change is required?

These changes are not required, but I explained in
  http://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2001/debian-www-200108/msg00103.html
why adding trailing slash in empty elements in template files is IMHO a good
idea.

Denis



Re: [patch] Let wml::debian::translation-check line be anywhere

2001-09-24 Thread Denis Barbier
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 07:47:01PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Denis Barbier wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > the wml::debian::translation-check currently prints its output where it
> > is called from; this may give strange results on some files if this line
> > appears at the top of the file, which is surely the most intuitive
> > location.
> > 
> > This patch diverts translation-check's output into a buffer which must
> > then be declared in all templates (I may have forgotten some).
> > 
> > I did not commit it since I am not sure everybody likes their template
> > being changed without agreement.
> 
> Just to let you know, I *really* like this idea/patch since it is more
> intuitive to handle.  If I had to say anything, I'd say "go".

In fact, I already committed this patch and announced it on
  http://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2001/debian-www-200109/msg00011.html
because many pages seemed to be affected by this problem.

Denis



Re: CVS webwml/english/template/debian

2001-09-24 Thread Martin Schulze
Denis Barbier wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 07:53:19PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > Debian CVS barbier wrote:
> > > Update of /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/template/debian
> > > In directory klecker:/tmp/cvs-serv24335
> > > 
> > > Modified Files:
> > >   consultant.wml ddp.wml event.wml mainpage.wml news.wml 
> > >   past_event.wml template.wml translation-check.wml votebar.wml 
> > > Log Message:
> > > Add a trailing slash for WML empty elements.
> > > HTML tags have not been changed.
> [...]
> > > -
> > > +
> > >  
> > >  #use wml::debian::footer NOCOMMENTS="yes" NOCOPYRIGHT="yes"
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> > Would you mind adding a small explanation why this change is required?
> 
> These changes are not required, but I explained in
>   http://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2001/debian-www-200108/msg00103.html
> why adding trailing slash in empty elements in template files is IMHO a good
> idea.

I'm still too stupid to understand.

Why do we have to use  instead of ?

Because there is no ?  If so why?

Regards,

Joey

-- 
No question is too silly to ask, but, of course, some are too silly
to answer.   -- Perl book



Re: http://www.debian.org/security shows till DSA-074, DSA-075 was already Aug, 14th

2001-09-24 Thread Martin Schulze
Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> 
> I hope this is the right list, please correct me in personal email if I'm 
> wrong.
> 
> http://www.debian.org/security/ shows only till DSA-074
> 
> but 
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/debian-security-announce-2001/
> 
> shows DSA-075-1 which is from Tue, 14 Aug 2001, i.e. quite old already,
> but can not be seen at the main page.

Fixed now, lousy webmaster were not doing their jobs...

> Plase CC me, as I do not know to which lists I'm subscribed.

Wanna know?

Regards,

Joey

PS: *hide*

-- 
No question is too silly to ask, but, of course, some are too silly
to answer.   -- Perl book

Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.



Re: webwml failed

2001-09-24 Thread Martin Schulze
Javier Fdz-Sanguino Pen~a wrote:
>   In any case, you could, in the future, try not to dismiss other's
> people's work as "useless crap". I, for one, worked for quite long in order
> to get this "crap" in a central place where other developers could make use
> of it in the future (you do know that people in Debian tend to have too many
> useful stuff around but not that much in our main WWW site, don't you?).

It may be too much to expect that somebody who plans to insert >50MB
to inform people in time, not more than half a year ago.  And I am
pretty sure that you haven't told us that you plan to insert more
than 50MB of binary crap to the web server/cvs server, also created
with non-free - and crappy by design - software which we cannot modify
in any way.

Ask the people a couple of days before, discuss issues with them and
they will be happy about your committement.  Forget that and get
the result for that.  Sorry, but that's life.  And I'm still getting
upset even though I took a one month rest.  You may have failed to
see that I have maintained /events/ for a while now and that I was
about the only person working on it.  Then while I was away you
came and created that mess, without prior contact to Joy, jt or
even f*cking me.

Regards,

Joey

-- 
No question is too silly to ask, but, of course, some are too silly
to answer.   -- Perl book

Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.



Re: CVS webwml/english/template/debian

2001-09-24 Thread Denis Barbier
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 10:28:04PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
[...]
> I'm still too stupid to understand.
> 
> Why do we have to use  instead of ?
> 
> Because there is no ?  If so why?

In HTML, some end tags are optional, e.g. , , usw.
Next generation is XHTML, which is based upon XML.  In XML, all
end tags are mandatory, but one can write  instead of
.

I suggested to adopt this syntax now in template files, because this change
allows generation of both HTML and XHTML files.  OTOH, WML cannot generate
XHTML files if templates are not XHTML-compliant.
So I see only benefits for this change, the only problem is our habits, this
is why I volunteered to slightly adapt templates when translating them.

You don't have to follow these changes if you don't like them, they are
currently a no-op, but they will become useful when w.d.o switches to XHTML.

Denis



Re: [aj@azure.humbug.org.au: Re: Debian testing - uninstallable packages]

2001-09-24 Thread Martin Schulze
Josip Rodin wrote:
> If you can't keep up with listmaster mail enough to notice that a bug
> report has been reassigned to its pseudo-package, isn't it time to make
> some changes?

parse error

-- 
No question is too silly to ask, but, of course, some are too silly
to answer.   -- Perl book



Consultants page.

2001-09-24 Thread David Martinez CSIC RedIRIS
Hello. Have you seen http://www.debian.org/consultants/ ? In every 
language 
appear some annoying tags like "<<< consultant.data === >>> 
1.161". I'm looking consultants.data but didn't find anything conclusive. 
Have you changed something (scripts, perl...) in klecker?

Regards,


Ender.