Bug#57796: www.debian.org: packages search engine doesn't find 'bug' package
Hi, > Package: www.debian.org > Version: 2211 > Severity: normal > > The search form at packages.debian.org does not return anything when > searching for "bug". This occurs even if you set all possible options > to max (search all versions and all releases). Strange, this still happens. The file /debian2/web/packages_db/input/Packages_i386_unstable.main contains the bug package (and bugsx, for that matter), but the search can't find it. > Possibly related: There is a package "bug," listed in the package index. Package index? > Glitch: The result form says "Reponses 1-0 of 0 responses shown." > Probably no matches should be made into a special case. Yes, this has been reported already. -- Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification
Bug#57888: marked as done (www.uk.debian.org speaks dutch)
Your message dated Thu, 1 Jun 2000 12:07:15 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Feb 2000 18:37:12 + Received: (qmail 19361 invoked from network); 12 Feb 2000 18:37:12 - Received: from scrabble.freeuk.net (212.126.144.6) by master.debian.org with SMTP; 12 Feb 2000 18:37:12 - Received: from [212.126.145.205] (helo=du-001-0205.freeuk.com) by scrabble.freeuk.net with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1) id 12JhPq-0002iR-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 12 Feb 2000 18:37:11 + Received: (qmail 2150 invoked by uid 1000); 12 Feb 2000 11:59:06 - Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2000 11:59:06 + To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: www.uk.debian.org speaks dutch Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i Package: www.debian.org On www.uk.debian.org, there are anchors that read About DebianOver Debian and Weekly NewsWekelijks Nieuws The former is in an alt= text, so it may have been missed by most people. --- Received: (at 57888-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jun 2000 10:09:33 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 01 05:09:33 2000 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130] (jrodin) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian)) id 12xRuj-0001k9-00; Thu, 01 Jun 2000 05:09:27 -0500 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by jagor.srce.hr (8.9.0/8.9.0) id MAA05042 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 1 Jun 2000 12:07:16 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 12:07:15 +0200 From: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Fixed. Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, www.uk.debian.org no longer seems to have broken slices wrt. translations of the tags. Thanks for reporting... -- Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification
Bug#33393: marked as done (www.debian.org: Suggestion for incoming_mirrors page)
Your message dated Thu, 1 Jun 2000 12:31:47 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Feb 1999 00:40:53 + Received: (qmail 25628 invoked from network); 15 Feb 1999 00:40:52 - Received: from mserv1a.u-net.net (195.102.240.34) by master.debian.org with SMTP; 15 Feb 1999 00:40:52 - Received: from (polya) [195.102.198.192] by mserv1a.u-net.net with esmtp (Exim 1.82 #2) id 10CC5t-0004PP-00; Mon, 15 Feb 1999 00:41:02 + Received: by maths.qmw.ac.uk via sendmail from stdin id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Debian Smail3.2.0.102) for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 15 Feb 1999 00:33:41 + (GMT) Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Julian Gilbey) Subject: www.debian.org: Suggestion for incoming_mirrors page To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Debian bug reports) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 00:33:40 + (GMT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL48 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 550 Package: www.debian.org Version: n/a Severity: wishlist I suggest that the incoming_mirrors page suggests how users may verify the md5sums and PGP sigs using the dscverify script in the devscripts package (>=2.0). That's what the script was written to do!! Julian =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian GNU/Linux Developer. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -*- Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for my PGP public key. -*- --- Received: (at 33393-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jun 2000 10:32:49 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 01 05:32:49 2000 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130] (jrodin) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian)) id 12xSHF-0005zc-00; Thu, 01 Jun 2000 05:32:43 -0500 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by jagor.srce.hr (8.9.0/8.9.0) id MAA09075 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 1 Jun 2000 12:31:47 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 12:31:47 +0200 From: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Fixed. Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, I have just commited new /devel/incoming_mirrors.wml page that contains a sentence about dscverify. Thanks for reporting... and I don't quite understand why did it take 1 year and 108 days to get this fixed! :-/ -- Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification
Bug#65037: www.debian.org: Mailing List Archive for debian-devel is not up to date
Package: www.debian.org Version: N/A; Severity: normal The Mailing List Archive for debian-devel at http://www.debian.org/Lists-Archives/ doesn't show the mails of the last two weeks.
Re: the modified BSD license is no more
On Wed, May 31, 2000 at 08:35:59PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > Whatever :) Even the Regents of the University of California have switched > to the better version of the license, which only strenghtens the position of > encouraging people to not use the advertising clause. The old version is > history and it should stay there. The old version is definitely *not* history, it is still used by many packages (the Regents' decision only affects stuff they hold copyright on). I agree that it should not be recommended for new programs, but this is not something that has changed, and the old version still is DFSG free. -- %%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
Bug#65037: marked as done (www.debian.org: Mailing List Archive for debian-devel is not up to date)
Your message dated Thu, 1 Jun 2000 17:44:20 +0200 (CEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#65037: www.debian.org: Mailing List Archive for debian-devel is not up to date has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jun 2000 10:45:44 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 01 05:45:44 2000 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de (mailhub.stusta.mhn.de) [141.84.69.4] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian)) id 12xSTw-0006NQ-00; Thu, 01 Jun 2000 05:45:44 -0500 Received: (qmail 14606 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2000 10:45:42 - Received: from r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (HELO r063144) (10.150.63.144) by mailhub.stusta.mhn.de with SMTP; 1 Jun 2000 10:45:42 - Received: from bunk by r063144 with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 12xSTu-xe-00; Thu, 01 Jun 2000 12:45:42 +0200 From: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: www.debian.org: Mailing List Archive for debian-devel is not up to date X-Reportbug-Version: 0.55 X-Mailer: reportbug 0.55 Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2000 12:45:42 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: www.debian.org Version: N/A; reported 2000-06-01 Severity: normal The Mailing List Archive for debian-devel at http://www.debian.org/Lists-Archives/ doesn't show the mails of the last two weeks. --- Received: (at 65037-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jun 2000 15:44:22 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 01 10:44:22 2000 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from nilpferd.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de [129.187.176.79] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian)) id 12xX8w-0007hv-00; Thu, 01 Jun 2000 10:44:22 -0500 Received: (qmail 26007 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2000 15:44:20 - Received: from neptun.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de (129.187.176.23) by nilpferd.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de with SMTP; 1 Jun 2000 15:44:20 - Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 17:44:20 +0200 (CEST) From: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Rick Younie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#65037: www.debian.org: Mailing List Archive for debian-devel is not up to date In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Thu, 1 Jun 2000, Rick Younie wrote: > > The Mailing List Archive for debian-devel at > > http://www.debian.org/Lists-Archives/ doesn't show the mails of the > > last two weeks. > > Either just updated or user error :) User error. :-( > You saw the tab icons at the top of the page, yes? I made that mistake > once. And I made it now... > Best, > Rick cu, Adrian -- A "No" uttered from deepest conviction is better and greater than a "Yes" merely uttered to please, or what is worse, to avoid trouble. -- Mahatma Ghandi
Re: the modified BSD license is no more
On Thu, Jun 01, 2000 at 04:25:35PM +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote: > > Whatever :) Even the Regents of the University of California have switched > > to the better version of the license, which only strenghtens the position of > > encouraging people to not use the advertising clause. The old version is > > history and it should stay there. > > The old version is definitely *not* history, it is still used by many > packages (the Regents' decision only affects stuff they hold copyright > on). I agree that it should not be recommended for new programs, but this > is not something that has changed, and the old version still is DFSG free. But I was not changing the DFSG and its list of free licenses, just a page on www.debian.org explaining the licenses, presumably to someone who doesn't know. I don't see the need to explain an old license which shouldn't be used in any new programs. -- Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification
RE: complete clone of the debian website
Title: RE: complete clone of the debian website Has anyone else thought of the fact that API is a really general term applied to every platform and piece of software known... It's sort of like Microsoft trademarking windows, or Debian trade-marking unix-like system (not that they did this). API Application Program Interface... Hmmm there's the WebObjects API, Win32 API, POSIX API, etc. etc. etc. Nice one Andrew -- Big Endian Girls make the RISCen world go round
the mirror run time
Hi, Actually, it's not 17:30 local time on master, it's half an hour later, because of ~archvsync/webmirrors/runmirrors script that has a `sleep 1800' before other commands. That timing has been changed to 17:30 on purpose, to be 13:52 (dinstall start) + the time it took for dinstall to finish (while it was still on master) + a little bit of overhead, just in case. Therefore it would be better to change the script to remove that sleeping time, the problem it addresses has been dealt with already. Also, there is another `sleep 3600' there, but IIRC it doesn't take one hour for the primary mirrors to rsync the daily changes, usually, so (if I'm right) that one should be changed, too. -- Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification
devel/join/
Hi people, Since James announced nm.debian.org on debian-devel-announce list already, and that contains links to the new New Maintainer Corner and to /devel/join/index.html page, which is a newer version of /devel/help.html, I have updated english/template/debian/develbar.wml file to link to the former, and removed the help.wml file generating the latter. -- Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification
Re: devel/join/
On Fri, Jun 02, 2000 at 12:32:09AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > Hi people, > > Since James announced nm.debian.org on debian-devel-announce list already, > and that contains links to the new New Maintainer Corner and to > /devel/join/index.html page, which is a newer version of /devel/help.html, > I have updated english/template/debian/develbar.wml file to link to the > former, and removed the help.wml file generating the latter. > Hmmm, help.wml contains the line: # This page will very soon be replaced with /devel/join/index.wml -- James (Jay) Treacy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: the mirror run time
On Fri, Jun 02, 2000 at 12:31:15AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > Hi, > > That timing has been changed to 17:30 on purpose, to be 13:52 (dinstall > start) + the time it took for dinstall to finish (while it was still on > master) + a little bit of overhead, just in case. Therefore it would be > better to change the script to remove that sleeping time, the problem it > addresses has been dealt with already. > > Also, there is another `sleep 3600' there, but IIRC it doesn't take one hour > for the primary mirrors to rsync the daily changes, usually, so (if I'm > right) that one should be changed, too. > Just got rid of the first sleep and changed the second set of mirrors to start in 1800s = 30m. -- James (Jay) Treacy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: devel/join/
Thanks! I have checked the devel page, and found that our primary web site has been updated :) In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, at Fri, 2 Jun 2000 00:32:09 +0200, on devel/join/, Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Since James announced nm.debian.org on debian-devel-announce list already, > and that contains links to the new New Maintainer Corner and to > /devel/join/index.html page, which is a newer version of /devel/help.html, > I have updated english/template/debian/develbar.wml file to link to the > former, and removed the help.wml file generating the latter. -- Taketoshi Sano: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bug#53675: marked as done (No longer a link to the CVS HOWTO?)
Your message dated Thu, 1 Jun 2000 11:59:47 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Dec 1999 14:33:20 + Received: (qmail 12844 invoked from network); 29 Dec 1999 14:33:19 - Received: from nefertiti.pasteur.fr (157.99.64.20) by master.debian.org with SMTP; 29 Dec 1999 14:33:19 - Received: from ezili.sis.pasteur.fr (ezili.sis.pasteur.fr [157.99.60.56]) by nefertiti.pasteur.fr (8.10.0.Beta10/8.10.0.Beta10) with ESMTP id dBTEXHT30410 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 29 Dec 1999 15:33:17 +0100 (MET) Received: from pasteur.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ezili.sis.pasteur.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-6) with ESMTP id PAA09161 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 29 Dec 1999 15:33:58 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Authentication-Warning: ezili.sis.pasteur.fr: Host localhost [127.0.0.1] claimed to be pasteur.fr X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 (debian) From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: No longer a link to the CVS HOWTO? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 29 Dec 1999 15:33:58 +0100 Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: www.debian.org Version: N/A I find this HOWTO: http://www.debian.org/devel/HOWTO.cvs quite useful but it no longer appears in: http://www.debian.org/devel/ --- Received: (at 53675-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jun 2000 09:59:35 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 01 04:59:35 2000 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from cibalia.gkvk.hr [161.53.211.3] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian)) id 12xRlA-0008RU-00; Thu, 01 Jun 2000 04:59:35 -0500 Received: from joy by cibalia.gkvk.hr with local (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian)) id 12xRlT-0003kq-00; Thu, 1 Jun 2000 11:59:47 +0200 Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 11:59:47 +0200 From: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Fixed. Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/1.0pre2i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, There is a link to HOWTO.cvs file in /devel/index page, the toolbar template has: Thanks for submitting... -- Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification
