Processed: tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Fri May 6 08:03:21 UTC 2011 > # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW > # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html > # > # Source package in NEW: sombok > tags 625754 + pending Bug #625754 [wnpp] ITP: sombok -- Unicode Text Segmentation library Added tag(s) pending. > # Source package in NEW: biosig4c++ > tags 585533 + pending Bug #585533 [wnpp] ITP: biosig4c++ -- library for accessing files in biomedical data formats Added tag(s) pending. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 585533: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=585533 625754: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=625754 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130466901030574.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#497153: status of bug #497153 (ITP: git-bzr)
Hi, What's the status of bug #497153? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110506101145.gt17...@piotro.eu
Bug#606633: marked as done (ITP: python-stats -- Calculator-style statistical functions for Python)
Your message dated Fri, 06 May 2011 10:44:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#620159: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #606633, regarding ITP: python-stats -- Calculator-style statistical functions for Python to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 606633: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606633 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: python-stats Version : 0.1.1a Upstream Author : Steven D'Aprano * URL : http://code.google.com/p/pycalcstats/ * License : MIT License Programming Lang: Python Description : Calculator-style statistical functions for Python Statistical functions - stats is a pure-Python module providing basic statistics functions similar to those found on scientific calculators. It has over 40 statistics functions, including: Univariate statistics: * arithmetic, harmonic, geometric and quadratic means * median, mode, midrange, trimean * mean of angular quantities * running and weighted averages * quartiles, hinges and quantiles * variance and standard deviation (sample and population) * average deviation and median average deviation (MAD) * skew and kurtosis * standard error of the mean Multivariate statistics: * Pearson's correlation coefficient * Q-correlation coefficient * covariance (sample and population) * linear regression * sums Sxx, Syy and Sxy and others. Requires Python 3.1 or better. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.6-8+rm Dear submitter, as the package python-stats has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/620159 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#598968: RFP: bsnes -- The most accurate SNES/SuperFamicom emulator
On Sunday 03 October 2010 16:37:57 you wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > > > * Package name: bsnes > Version : 0.70 > Upstream Author : byuu > * URL : http://byuu.org/bsnes/ > * License : GPL2 > Programming Lang: C++ > Description : The most accurate SNES/SuperFamicom emulator > > >>From the web site: > bsnes is an emulator that began development on 2004-10-14. The purpose > of this emulator is a bit different from others: it focuses on accuracy, > debugging functionality, and clean code. > > The emulator does not focus on things that would hinder accuracy. This > includes speed and game-specific hacks for compatibility. As a result, > the minimum system requirements for bsnes are very high. > > The emulator itself was not derived from any existing emulator source > code, such as SNES9x. It was written from scratch by myself. Any > similarities to other emulators are merely coincidental. > > It is a very easy to use emulator with great, great accuracy. Best I've > seen so far! Isn't it a bit useless to package bsnes? mednafen (in Debian) has bsnes already integrated [1] (afaik also with netplay support). Maybe it would be better to help the mednafen maintainer [2]. For example nobody showed any reactions to the ubuntu bugs (and maybe from other derivatives). Maybe you could also provide some insight how to use the different emulation cores or something like that. Also the debhelper compat could be updated to 8, dh could be used in debian/rules and line endings fixed in copyright file. If you want upstream help then you could try to get all patches since bsnes v059 be applied on top of the mednafen version. [1] http://forum.fobby.net/index.php?t=msg&th=544&start=0&; [2] http://packages.qa.debian.org/m/mednafen.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201105061223.31649.emil.langr...@gmx.de
Bug#516750: Packaging of latest version rsplib-2.7.11
Hi! The latest version of the rsplib package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rsplib - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rsplib/rsplib_2.7.11-1.dsc Best regards -- Thomas Dreibholz signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#601707: marked as done (ITP: libgdf -- IO library for the GDF (general dataformat for biosignals))
Your message dated Fri, 06 May 2011 11:47:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#601707: fixed in libgdf 0.1.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #601707, regarding ITP: libgdf -- IO library for the GDF (general dataformat for biosignals) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 601707: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=601707 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: NeuroDebian Team * Package name: libgdf Version : 0.1 Upstream Author : Martin Billinger * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/libgdf * License : LGPL Programming Lang: C++ Description : IO library for the GDF (general dataformat for biosignals) GDF (General Dataformat for Biosignals) is intended to provide a generic storage for biosignals, such as EEG, ECG, MEG etc. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: libgdf Source-Version: 0.1.1-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libgdf, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gdf-tools_0.1.1-1_amd64.deb to main/libg/libgdf/gdf-tools_0.1.1-1_amd64.deb libgdf-dev_0.1.1-1_amd64.deb to main/libg/libgdf/libgdf-dev_0.1.1-1_amd64.deb libgdf0-dbg_0.1.1-1_amd64.deb to main/libg/libgdf/libgdf0-dbg_0.1.1-1_amd64.deb libgdf0_0.1.1-1_amd64.deb to main/libg/libgdf/libgdf0_0.1.1-1_amd64.deb libgdf_0.1.1-1.debian.tar.gz to main/libg/libgdf/libgdf_0.1.1-1.debian.tar.gz libgdf_0.1.1-1.dsc to main/libg/libgdf/libgdf_0.1.1-1.dsc libgdf_0.1.1.orig.tar.gz to main/libg/libgdf/libgdf_0.1.1.orig.tar.gz matlab-gdf_0.1.1-1_all.deb to contrib/libg/libgdf/matlab-gdf_0.1.1-1_all.deb octave-gdf_0.1.1-1_amd64.deb to main/libg/libgdf/octave-gdf_0.1.1-1_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 601...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Yaroslav Halchenko (supplier of updated libgdf package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 21:29:24 -0400 Source: libgdf Binary: libgdf0 libgdf0-dbg libgdf-dev gdf-tools octave-gdf matlab-gdf Architecture: source amd64 all Version: 0.1.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: NeuroDebian Team Changed-By: Yaroslav Halchenko Description: gdf-tools - IO library for the GDF -- helper tools libgdf-dev - IO library for the GDF -- development library libgdf0- IO library for the GDF (general dataformat for biosignals) libgdf0-dbg - IO library for the GDF -- debug symbols matlab-gdf - IO library for the GDF -- Matlab interface octave-gdf - IO library for the GDF -- Octave interface Closes: 601707 Changes: libgdf (0.1.1-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Initial release (Closes: #601707) * Few post-release upstream bugfixes absorbed into quilt patches: - fixed data orientation in the resampling example - fixed event channel numbering in gdf_writer - fixed event mode 3 handling in the resampling example * Depend on matlab-support package for install-time building of Matlab extensions Checksums-Sha1: c805a0bfee6f10f6fb8e945c08ff71d3865d0380 1453 libgdf_0.1.1-1.dsc 2a1d0ee3f9ac4f56038d14873ce7ee867c4e92f3 329382 libgdf_0.1.1.orig.tar.gz 7df394cf32ac5cbc1e757d3d21113f8e3709cf18 5561 libgdf_0.1.1-1.debian.tar.gz d7a9e007e3b2b5abbc88356bff9f4c50db8e199c 99528 libgdf0_0.1.1-1_amd64.deb b970ceada481b094dff279a6399235961625719b 1350592 libgdf0-dbg_0.1.1-1_amd64.deb f813e651c393d062a69045cf247447f113808fbb 18260 libgdf-dev_0.1.1-1_amd64.deb 59e913cc7fe9580f47e89f78864113796499796c 34976 gdf-tools_0.1.1-1_amd64.deb 5535e0ab262aa8221ea93f76d3fc31804b73f4a4 114402 octave-gdf_0.1.1-1_amd64.deb ad5a71595739c5e113095f69b1dc15640993b1a5 21514 matlab-gdf_0.1.1-1_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: 609943c3c58f56dd195350c6a365b34fb93e9be55431e5ce3372d1b3c18f1acf 1453 libgdf_0.1.1-1.dsc e833708cf379e0a681159e0be5ee51d7860b1f77c862072b5fa9b5df9ff07e34 329382 libgdf_0.1.1.orig.tar.gz 58e0e9259a167408186f6ed68e080dd803ed4c5f589f3a94e3b4405121aec03d 5561 libgdf_0.1.1-1.debian.tar.gz 0d8139c6b90fe1de4f60f9121a99bd7534f09633b8e8d83d392ab2ae237afd5f 99528 libgdf0_0.1.1-1
Bug#585533: marked as done (ITP: biosig4c++ -- library for accessing files in biomedical data formats)
Your message dated Fri, 06 May 2011 11:47:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#585533: fixed in biosig4c++ 0.96.3+svn2677-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #585533, regarding ITP: biosig4c++ -- library for accessing files in biomedical data formats to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 585533: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=585533 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Yaroslav Halchenko Owner: Yaroslav Halchenko * Package name: biosig4c++ Version : 0.93 Upstream Author : Alois Schloegl * URL : http://biosig.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL Programming Lang: C, C++, Python Description : library for accessing files in biomedical data formats A library for accessing files in several biomedical data formats (including EDF, BDF, GDF, BrainVision, BCI2000, CFWB, HL7aECG, SCP_ECG (EN1064), MFER, ACQ, CNT(Neuroscan), DEMG, EGI, EEG1100, FAMOS, SigmaPLpro, TMS32). The complete list of supported file formats is available at http://hci.tugraz.at/schloegl/biosig/TESTED . . This package provides header files and static library libbiosig.a which provides access to a variety of dataformats. There is also ITP #251868 for biosig (octave/matlab interfaces) which I leave open for now. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: biosig4c++ Source-Version: 0.96.3+svn2677-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of biosig4c++, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: biosig-tools_0.96.3+svn2677-1_amd64.deb to main/b/biosig4c++/biosig-tools_0.96.3+svn2677-1_amd64.deb biosig4c++_0.96.3+svn2677-1.debian.tar.gz to main/b/biosig4c++/biosig4c++_0.96.3+svn2677-1.debian.tar.gz biosig4c++_0.96.3+svn2677-1.dsc to main/b/biosig4c++/biosig4c++_0.96.3+svn2677-1.dsc biosig4c++_0.96.3+svn2677.orig.tar.gz to main/b/biosig4c++/biosig4c++_0.96.3+svn2677.orig.tar.gz libbiosig-dev_0.96.3+svn2677-1_amd64.deb to main/b/biosig4c++/libbiosig-dev_0.96.3+svn2677-1_amd64.deb libbiosig0-dbg_0.96.3+svn2677-1_amd64.deb to main/b/biosig4c++/libbiosig0-dbg_0.96.3+svn2677-1_amd64.deb libbiosig0_0.96.3+svn2677-1_amd64.deb to main/b/biosig4c++/libbiosig0_0.96.3+svn2677-1_amd64.deb octave-biosig_0.96.3+svn2677-1_amd64.deb to main/b/biosig4c++/octave-biosig_0.96.3+svn2677-1_amd64.deb python-biosig_0.96.3+svn2677-1_amd64.deb to main/b/biosig4c++/python-biosig_0.96.3+svn2677-1_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 585...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Yaroslav Halchenko (supplier of updated biosig4c++ package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 12:28:27 -0400 Source: biosig4c++ Binary: libbiosig0 libbiosig0-dbg libbiosig-dev biosig-tools python-biosig octave-biosig Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.96.3+svn2677-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: NeuroDebian Team Changed-By: Yaroslav Halchenko Description: biosig-tools - format conversion tools for biomedical data formats libbiosig-dev - I/O library for biomedical data - development files libbiosig0 - I/O library for biomedical data - dynamic library libbiosig0-dbg - I/O library for biomedical data - debug symbols octave-biosig - Octave bindings for BioSig library python-biosig - Python bindings for BioSig library Closes: 585533 Changes: biosig4c++ (0.96.3+svn2677-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Initial release (Closes: #585533) * Ship and use a copy of eventcodes.txt from biosig project * Patches added: - up_system_octave_version to build against default available version of octave - deb_no_mex_copy_upstairs to not try copy resultant .mex files outside of the tree - deb_link_dynamically* to assure dynamic linking against the library - deb_no_locals to avoid errorneous linking against /usr/local Checksums-Sha1: 7bc1cb5d478c642e3f9b9902a9b8362ab8e4d184 1510 biosig4c++_0.96.3+svn2677-1.dsc cc1ba3ffa376b7901cf8565ee3a605343831747d 554790 biosig4c++_0.96.3+svn2677.orig.tar.gz ae518e375c48186468d91771b19a5f74303c67e7 106
Bug#625754: marked as done (ITP: sombok -- Unicode Text Segmentation library)
Your message dated Fri, 06 May 2011 11:48:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#625754: fixed in sombok 2.0.5-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #625754, regarding ITP: sombok -- Unicode Text Segmentation library to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 625754: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=625754 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Emmanuel Bouthenot * Package name: sombok Version : 2.0.5 Upstream Author : Hatuka*nezumi - IKEDA Soji * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/linefold/files * License : GPL-2+ Programming Lang: C Description : Unicode Text Segmentation library Sombok library performs Line Breaking Algorithm described in Unicode Standards Annex #14 (UAX #14). East_Asian_Width informative properties defined by Annex #11 (UAX #11) may be concerned to determin breaking positions. This library also implements “default” Grapheme Cluster segmentation described in Annex #29 (UAX #29). --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: sombok Source-Version: 2.0.5-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of sombok, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libsombok-dev_2.0.5-1_amd64.deb to main/s/sombok/libsombok-dev_2.0.5-1_amd64.deb libsombok3_2.0.5-1_amd64.deb to main/s/sombok/libsombok3_2.0.5-1_amd64.deb sombok_2.0.5-1.debian.tar.gz to main/s/sombok/sombok_2.0.5-1.debian.tar.gz sombok_2.0.5-1.dsc to main/s/sombok/sombok_2.0.5-1.dsc sombok_2.0.5.orig.tar.gz to main/s/sombok/sombok_2.0.5.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 625...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Emmanuel Bouthenot (supplier of updated sombok package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 11:33:46 + Source: sombok Binary: libsombok-dev libsombok3 Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2.0.5-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Emmanuel Bouthenot Changed-By: Emmanuel Bouthenot Description: libsombok-dev - Unicode Text Segmentation library (development files) libsombok3 - Unicode Text Segmentation library Closes: 625754 Changes: sombok (2.0.5-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Initial Release (Closes: #625754). Checksums-Sha1: 404eb3763e192acb15f0bbed8fec873f1abc18da 1856 sombok_2.0.5-1.dsc f1e84668c789a48ad5946e7dee819bac16eaf20c 416632 sombok_2.0.5.orig.tar.gz a7b3b555bf5e1797fa283d1263425c890742f7cd 2255 sombok_2.0.5-1.debian.tar.gz 3a28b952385e1c96b244795a6d760a65dc7c39f1 91072 libsombok-dev_2.0.5-1_amd64.deb 1b7b11fa11da38d44de52678f8636dbf752170a8 26626 libsombok3_2.0.5-1_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: 697915d515958c61830dd4f2cb5a797bb6d72e3ab9f8f0edce93e8f4abdf6b7d 1856 sombok_2.0.5-1.dsc 92ef99a20b28a09cae947e41293398a4fb4101edeeac4e6435b43cd3b3a54239 416632 sombok_2.0.5.orig.tar.gz 0a1b8ccad62d9f73d18f8fcbe06f65f5285661457a99e6998bb1361b21cfaad9 2255 sombok_2.0.5-1.debian.tar.gz cbc8e131ba60fbe507424859ac0a7e28dad320f25d9be520661181aa16f6199b 91072 libsombok-dev_2.0.5-1_amd64.deb 24e9f080d596e8b67dd965578fae9e9c94600990c0914064711fd5434730fec3 26626 libsombok3_2.0.5-1_amd64.deb Files: 2a8712f8f6897619f2b963ee19a999f2 1856 libs optional sombok_2.0.5-1.dsc af78a04e07998aedc12a841fa2b168d2 416632 libs optional sombok_2.0.5.orig.tar.gz 4ebc122cd453f124d706b76fea75e416 2255 libs optional sombok_2.0.5-1.debian.tar.gz 45b758553b2ec6a3424ef2dbd6898a28 91072 libdevel optional libsombok-dev_2.0.5-1_amd64.deb 16da9529dae7539d2b7c69a65a7f1c88 26626 libs optional libsombok3_2.0.5-1_amd64.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJNwxfpAAoJEEsHdyOSnULDnBgP/iGM3wLxBZwPgkdUzQOWLU3B DQHQLH8FgaiUwQcyD1DyPfLI5EYmHqN80w2BSSYdJewrLkoLASkBZqb1Y+x6eOJs z4jOY73PB84dFd8PQimZP9Ur8bDx55YphbH1uruSDeC3XZOFsvl01en4Me/HvsgX Os/j6gqFAQehQvkhr0NocIRWyfiMINg6nYMUbGEwVR/MphgwyLymjEGl6y6dBIWm +jT4XZHsEWmSg2g3FfkYnLZkv6pYEFo6XlnrzG8ln2uClKP5i6fNY5DwN11Ojthz 3hMrDGUT+jPGLUteyGQLCtYHNlvJWHYCUizKy3P9NxjvJeQIbpsyTX5PsZR2fkmC x2vi5vj8mGMj+d0bhEOlXo5t41dz0onlOzlzwW/rYOlljNKFpHKUmTUgbly0
Bug#623944: marked as done (ITP: fonts-pagul - TrueType font for Sourashtra language)
Your message dated Fri, 06 May 2011 11:47:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#623944: fixed in fonts-pagul 1.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #623944, regarding ITP: fonts-pagul - TrueType font for Sourashtra language to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 623944: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=623944 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: fonts-pagul * Version : 0.1 * Upstream Author : Prabu M Rengachari * URL : https://sourceforge.net/projects/pagul/ * License : GPLV3 with Font exception * Programming Lang: Font * Description : Pagul TrueType font for Sourashtra language This is Pagul TrueType font for Sourashtra(saz_IN) script. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: fonts-pagul Source-Version: 1.0-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of fonts-pagul, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: fonts-pagul_1.0-1.debian.tar.gz to main/f/fonts-pagul/fonts-pagul_1.0-1.debian.tar.gz fonts-pagul_1.0-1.dsc to main/f/fonts-pagul/fonts-pagul_1.0-1.dsc fonts-pagul_1.0-1_all.deb to main/f/fonts-pagul/fonts-pagul_1.0-1_all.deb fonts-pagul_1.0.orig.tar.gz to main/f/fonts-pagul/fonts-pagul_1.0.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 623...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Debian-IN Team (supplier of updated fonts-pagul package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 06 May 2011 12:40:24 +0530 Source: fonts-pagul Binary: fonts-pagul Architecture: source all Version: 1.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian-IN Team Changed-By: Debian-IN Team Description: fonts-pagul - Free TrueType font for the Sourashtra language Closes: 623944 Changes: fonts-pagul (1.0-1) unstable; urgency=low . [Vasudev Kamath] * Initial release (Closes: #623944) . [Kartik Mistry] * Fixed watch and added get-orig-source Checksums-Sha1: 4713dd8503b931fa76a0bb8d020824611ec8fb9b 1245 fonts-pagul_1.0-1.dsc fcd5edb4e12b336dd599b3e797120648f18758fa 547338 fonts-pagul_1.0.orig.tar.gz e193fd54a2447325d05fc6d92ef67967d84f87b4 2879 fonts-pagul_1.0-1.debian.tar.gz 3a9ee783f988240c54216f5bc62af8bc462f3291 75218 fonts-pagul_1.0-1_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: d697e5cebe06fe3521bdb729bd47cf3d7e904b67448ac6d0d48399e67ba88d6c 1245 fonts-pagul_1.0-1.dsc 3f6ca1b874ae90d40a7a58b3469b8c765a8554a2de14c3379267b59949dde666 547338 fonts-pagul_1.0.orig.tar.gz 7b48dcf87e44a976f8d560568df8842cf3ecfe475789cfa13b1b2d6ce2831935 2879 fonts-pagul_1.0-1.debian.tar.gz 5a6fc7d416561c6039ed8559a26add99e166a3cd54fde756b1d3e57c7c85ef8f 75218 fonts-pagul_1.0-1_all.deb Files: 2b2e4598c8e35f54625ef698cfe3a809 1245 fonts extra fonts-pagul_1.0-1.dsc d4701db36782f8e71fabb4f34fa1bf39 547338 fonts extra fonts-pagul_1.0.orig.tar.gz 9c4354129a4113be64ed0fc3503c78bf 2879 fonts extra fonts-pagul_1.0-1.debian.tar.gz 4609227d81307064e26b746ef4d3bc63 75218 fonts extra fonts-pagul_1.0-1_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk3DoFkACgkQoRg/jtECjI2UtACfTHyopZgxm4odFXsroy2WGLOj LgYAoKe29iXkvLTkX9yNgL6PW0jOVizC =lS4d -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- End Message ---
Bug#572461: marked as done (ITP: libhbalinux -- HBAAPI vendor library for Linux)
Your message dated Fri, 06 May 2011 11:33:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#572461: fixed in libhbalinux 1.0.10-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #572461, regarding ITP: libhbalinux -- HBAAPI vendor library for Linux to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 572461: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=572461 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Ritesh Raj Sarraf * Package name: libhbalinux Version : 1.0.9 Upstream Author : Open-FCoE Developers * URL : http://www.Open-FCoE.org/ * License : LGPLv2 Programming Lang: C Description : HBAAPI vendor library for Linux SNIA HBAAPI vendor library built on top of the scsi_transport_fc interfaces .. This package is required by FCoE --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: libhbalinux Source-Version: 1.0.10-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libhbalinux, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libhbalinux-dev_1.0.10-1_amd64.deb to main/libh/libhbalinux/libhbalinux-dev_1.0.10-1_amd64.deb libhbalinux2_1.0.10-1_amd64.deb to main/libh/libhbalinux/libhbalinux2_1.0.10-1_amd64.deb libhbalinux_1.0.10-1.debian.tar.gz to main/libh/libhbalinux/libhbalinux_1.0.10-1.debian.tar.gz libhbalinux_1.0.10-1.dsc to main/libh/libhbalinux/libhbalinux_1.0.10-1.dsc libhbalinux_1.0.10.orig.tar.gz to main/libh/libhbalinux/libhbalinux_1.0.10.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 572...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Ritesh Raj Sarraf (supplier of updated libhbalinux package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 14:10:57 +0530 Source: libhbalinux Binary: libhbalinux-dev libhbalinux2 Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.0.10-1 Distribution: experimental Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian FCoE Maintainers Changed-By: Ritesh Raj Sarraf Description: libhbalinux-dev - Library headers files for retrieving FCOE adapter information libhbalinux2 - Library for retrieving FCOE adapater information Closes: 572461 Changes: libhbalinux (1.0.10-1) experimental; urgency=low . * Initial release (Closes: #572461) Initial packaging taken from Ubuntu. Thanks to the team Checksums-Sha1: 06c47d6206e06bb6b379e7280c8c9d8150e1ca70 2047 libhbalinux_1.0.10-1.dsc 9529f8be388cded713668ed776c4392aa0727b8b 42295 libhbalinux_1.0.10.orig.tar.gz 69d7e670d1589042f6eed2546567bc35373c754e 283080 libhbalinux_1.0.10-1.debian.tar.gz d4378734eb979e10502e0efec7fbbb4166a070f2 3608 libhbalinux-dev_1.0.10-1_amd64.deb e7c9d2ffbf8bcfefc13d5f16973ecdd9fe8ce0b5 20368 libhbalinux2_1.0.10-1_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: dc6a1ec47c4900858576fec4bd1cff4ba779bf60b3d03586cfc00e65d909da3b 2047 libhbalinux_1.0.10-1.dsc b5fd856d24572a03c547218095f3ace19e614bbcc197a0c2cfd4599cb3c255a3 42295 libhbalinux_1.0.10.orig.tar.gz 5608c1ff716883865f8382c2ff15e4c70774e389ef4440cbaa5f336b92be118f 283080 libhbalinux_1.0.10-1.debian.tar.gz 2c074c3524cc52568dec2958a82792f79046a616d59334940e5aec553f8b09e9 3608 libhbalinux-dev_1.0.10-1_amd64.deb b53807cd4314b940b8887cd419642d56caaa9d1283d5568fe64a8e684f55828f 20368 libhbalinux2_1.0.10-1_amd64.deb Files: 2f5d08d9e9342df84b9e30fb9696e7bd 2047 libs extra libhbalinux_1.0.10-1.dsc b84bd8eac568e6ef407f5ea46c66cf1f 42295 libs extra libhbalinux_1.0.10.orig.tar.gz 101dc4f4b0d560a236f974f255261cce 283080 libs extra libhbalinux_1.0.10-1.debian.tar.gz 3a8166929a528f27dcde798853df3f91 3608 libdevel extra libhbalinux-dev_1.0.10-1_amd64.deb 9259f8d2f40df791a3191256a2f9f6ac 20368 libs extra libhbalinux2_1.0.10-1_amd64.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJNwreYAAoJEKY6WKPy4XVpzBwP/3S06mgr/WkjFM9JLyS/Fx/4 LY8N6DdiU5PAH7LmTfbd2HUVflLQVptqp/OdPhs25ntppeHGmX2X1WSZMsbhbAJ7 LhxvP/SiUl+TEhNJnqNtCBcf+JSOX94B18seP7EivIALYu4UOrJOmMCR4fiV+2mt dpyr4zj7N2V7oo2q4G2SWxdNcRW1Zmi+6tc7nkWomhZN7Ogby1PdBm9nJBT2xWrP gW8EH24ZebYGkNQIbmXCcSK0h4FnLBexS8JEOOv1ukPgcJm9EDNT7aNwh9NJljdR t7KZwSWp5uOM0qbg/EZIjFhgH01c+6S+sy3Cgmc2DOyj85lCgHRtUxknKAClsfZh T6YqB74hO8Of0
Bug#623597: marked as done (ITP: bcrypt-ruby -- OpenBSD's bcrypt() password hashing algorithm.)
Your message dated Fri, 06 May 2011 11:34:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#623597: fixed in ruby-bcrypt 2.1.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #623597, regarding ITP: bcrypt-ruby -- OpenBSD's bcrypt() password hashing algorithm. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 623597: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=623597 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Vasudev Kamath * Package name: bcrypt-ruby Version : 2.1.4 Upstream Author : Coda Hale * URL : http://bcrypt-ruby.rubyforge.org * License : BSD Programming Lang: Ruby Description : OpenBSD's bcrypt() password hashing algorithm. bcrypt() is a sophisticated and secure hash algorithm designed by The OpenBSD project for hashing passwords. bcrypt-ruby provides a simple, humane wrapper for safely handling passwords. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: ruby-bcrypt Source-Version: 2.1.4-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ruby-bcrypt, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: ruby-bcrypt_2.1.4-1.debian.tar.gz to main/r/ruby-bcrypt/ruby-bcrypt_2.1.4-1.debian.tar.gz ruby-bcrypt_2.1.4-1.dsc to main/r/ruby-bcrypt/ruby-bcrypt_2.1.4-1.dsc ruby-bcrypt_2.1.4-1_amd64.deb to main/r/ruby-bcrypt/ruby-bcrypt_2.1.4-1_amd64.deb ruby-bcrypt_2.1.4.orig.tar.gz to main/r/ruby-bcrypt/ruby-bcrypt_2.1.4.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 623...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Vasudev Kamath (supplier of updated ruby-bcrypt package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 22:50:12 +0530 Source: ruby-bcrypt Binary: ruby-bcrypt Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2.1.4-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Lucas Nussbaum Changed-By: Vasudev Kamath Description: ruby-bcrypt - Ruby binding for the bcrypt() password hashing algorithm Closes: 623597 Changes: ruby-bcrypt (2.1.4-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Initial release (Closes: #623597) Checksums-Sha1: d83704ffdfcd433c573c2abd20caffe1388b4920 1341 ruby-bcrypt_2.1.4-1.dsc c92bed2cb59166796b27abf59ce04d19c31961c0 36629 ruby-bcrypt_2.1.4.orig.tar.gz 79bab7d13a1914e1a69b3f633874d5a176e77d35 3028 ruby-bcrypt_2.1.4-1.debian.tar.gz 1d87319ba600c3dc50515dbf30c19c24ce4b959c 21462 ruby-bcrypt_2.1.4-1_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: 976060d790a4f2e71054934e22c8cf1fe0de38ea4a082afabb87ccb5407e11f7 1341 ruby-bcrypt_2.1.4-1.dsc 7f97d70560c9f40df2d79e3832998e9692f7405e6221f8ad26d676b2a6f8088d 36629 ruby-bcrypt_2.1.4.orig.tar.gz fb01d4b555489f66d61a4ac503933bb6cd6b8f67ddeb479154b66eac064e9f5f 3028 ruby-bcrypt_2.1.4-1.debian.tar.gz 6037270f05e120f5c1673525071e14f451d39e88e19be6f018797f351af99848 21462 ruby-bcrypt_2.1.4-1_amd64.deb Files: fb9a27eb39feb390c115edbfc95eba93 1341 ruby optional ruby-bcrypt_2.1.4-1.dsc 9acb1e5cf26485d5e6c9e7891619b63f 36629 ruby optional ruby-bcrypt_2.1.4.orig.tar.gz f88c1e2c6f27cfebfada6a1dece40dd6 3028 ruby optional ruby-bcrypt_2.1.4-1.debian.tar.gz 3fc13f5368c15d703291f9408ccfa14e 21462 ruby optional ruby-bcrypt_2.1.4-1_amd64.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFNwmOb2hliNwI7P08RAiOjAJ4ju+dclj0WFpRAeNxqnBqxi7n7lgCbBUKa QUTfVNjqSZIqHw+MTDvW++g= =kJWa -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- End Message ---
Bug#425609: Status of packaging opengrok
Hi Lubos Aside from packaging of lucene 3, whats the current state of the opengrok packaging? We'd like to use opengrok for Ubuntu and I'd be happy to help out if there is anything I can do to help finish this work. Cheers James -- James Page Software Engineer, Ubuntu Server Team signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#625865: ITP: ocportal -- ocPortal is a Content Management System for building and maintaining a dynamic website
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Chris Warburton * Package name: ocportal Version : 6.1.1 Upstream Author : Chris Graham * URL : http://www.ocportal.com * License : CPAL Programming Lang: PHP Description : ocPortal is a Content Management System for building and maintaining a dynamic website ocPortal is a Content Management System (CMS), which acts as the "engine" to run sophisticated, dynamic Web sites. ocPortal attempts to include as much functionality as possible "out of the box", with options to disable unwanted modules after installation. An emphasis is placed on ease of use, with built-in GUIs for all common requirements, whilst reprogramming is supported through a system of file overrides. ocPortal sites can host content of various types including news, member blogs, events, galleries (images, video, audio, Flash), file downloads and user-defined "catalogue" data. Many modules are included for dynamic features such as forums, chat rooms, Wikis, commenting, rating, awards, trackbacks, polls, quizzes, ecommerce (products sales and usergroup subscription) and a 'points' system for rewarding contributors. Content can be made available in multiple languages and will be automatically analysed for Search Engine Optimisation. Powerful administration tools are available, including banner networks, a comprehensive admin zone with check lists and reminders, email newsletters (including automatic "What's new?" issues), site statistics, hacking detection and alerts, backups, theming tools and a powerful commandline environment. ocPortal is written in PHP, XHTML and Javascript and conforms to Web and Accessibility standards. Custom languages are included for theming/templating (Tempcode) and markup (Comcode), the latter being inspired by the "BBCode" language found on many forums. ocPortal includes its own forum, called OCF, but can also integrate or import many third-party forums and CMSs. There is currently at least some support for: AEF, Burning Board, IPB, Joomla, MKPortal, MyBB, phpBB, phpNuke, SMF, static HTML, vB, Wordpress and WowBB. ocPortal requires PHP 4.2+ or HipHop, MySQL and a Web server such as Apache. ocPortal development is supported by ocProducts Ltd. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110506125621.24012.17736.reportbug@linuxfedora
Bug#625865: ITP: ocportal -- ocPortal is a Content Management System for building and maintaining a dynamic website
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 15:16 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le vendredi 06 mai 2011 à 09:11 -0400, Scott Kitterman a écrit : > > On Friday, May 06, 2011 08:56:21 AM Chris Warburton wrote: > > > Programming Lang: PHP > > > Description : ocPortal is a Content Management System for building > > > and maintaining a dynamic website > > > > How many content management systems written in php does Debian need? > > How about zero? What's up with the hate? It's always convenient to have a package in Debian, instead of hunting for it upstream. If it rots in Debian, then it can easily be removed again (or left in Unstable). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1304689785.20397.1.camel@debian.tauspace.local
Processed: Re: CVS
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 617578 ITA: cvs -- Concurrent Versions System Bug #617578 [wnpp] RFA: cvs -- Concurrent Versions System Changed Bug title to 'ITA: cvs -- Concurrent Versions System' from 'RFA: cvs -- Concurrent Versions System' > owner 617578 ! Bug #617578 [wnpp] ITA: cvs -- Concurrent Versions System Owner recorded as Thorsten Glaser . > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 617578: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=617578 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13046898011251.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#625865: ITP: ocportal -- ocPortal is a Content Management System for building and maintaining a dynamic website
On Friday, May 06, 2011 08:56:21 AM Chris Warburton wrote: > Programming Lang: PHP > Description : ocPortal is a Content Management System for building > and maintaining a dynamic website How many content management systems written in php does Debian need? Scott K -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201105060911.09204.deb...@kitterman.com
Bug#354176: CVS
retitle 617578 ITA: cvs -- Concurrent Versions System owner 617578 ! thanks Steve McIntyre dixit: >OK, help yourself to cvs. I hadn't even seen your offer to take it >over; wnpp reports don't automatically send responses to the >submitter. Oh, okay, didn’t know that. >I'll be happy that somebody might be caring about it, and >it's not me. :-) Gladly. I’m still using it about daily, after all. === #354176 [RFH] === After I’ve uploaded the new package, all we’ll need at first is bug triaging; I expect most bugs to simply go away, and some to open anew (none to reopen hopefully). Also, we’ll have people wondering what will have happened to pserver, these need educating (although I’ll add a NEWS.Debian). bye, //mirabilos -- If Harry Potter gets a splitting headache in his scar when he’s near Tom Riddle (aka Voldemort), does Tom get pain in the arse when Harry is near him? -- me, wondering why it’s not Jerry Potter……… -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pine.bsm.4.64l.1105061345450.23...@herc.mirbsd.org
Bug#625865: ITP: ocportal -- ocPortal is a Content Management System for building and maintaining a dynamic website
Le vendredi 06 mai 2011 à 09:11 -0400, Scott Kitterman a écrit : > On Friday, May 06, 2011 08:56:21 AM Chris Warburton wrote: > > Programming Lang: PHP > > Description : ocPortal is a Content Management System for building > > and maintaining a dynamic website > > How many content management systems written in php does Debian need? How about zero? -- Joss -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1304687818.3352.29.camel@pi0307572
Bug#448638: Debian packages for I2P
KillYourTV has made some nice packages for I2P - the router and some apps that use i2p as well as unrelated stuff, all which can be found at: http://killyourtc.i2p.to/debian He's actively maintining and improving it. Maybe that's of interest here? Cheers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110506131633.5C30BAE5FF@smtp.postman.i2p
Bug#625865: ITP: ocportal -- ocPortal is a Content Management System for building and maintaining a dynamic website
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 09:11 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Friday, May 06, 2011 08:56:21 AM Chris Warburton wrote: > > Programming Lang: PHP > > Description : ocPortal is a Content Management System for building > > and maintaining a dynamic website > > How many content management systems written in php does Debian need? > > Scott K About the same as the number of C window managers? ;) You have a valid point, so I've had a quick attempt to justify this. A quick package search for "cms" and "content management" in all suites gives 8 distinct, self-described CMS systems in Debian. 5 of these are written in PHP. For those which have entries, I've compared them on cmsmatrix.org and the most impressive entry is WebGUI, which is made in Perl. However, the (somewhat arbitrary) cmsmatrix feature count is still +4 in favour of ocPortal. Also, for those who are into it, ocPortal is under the Affero-style CPAL license, which is the reason I got involved in the project. Thanks, Chris Warburton -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1304692143.20621.20.camel@linuxfedora
Bug#625865: ITP: ocportal -- ocPortal is a Content Management System for building and maintaining a dynamic website
On 05/06/2011 10:49 AM, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: > What's up with the hate? It's always convenient to have a package in > Debian, instead of hunting for it upstream. If it rots in Debian, then > it can easily be removed again (or left in Unstable). Wrong. Every additional package costs the whole Debian project in numerous ways. That's why we have these discussions up front on all ITPs, so objections can be voiced. Ben -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dc3ff0c.3080...@debian.org
Bug#625865: ITP: ocportal -- ocPortal is a Content Management System for building and maintaining a dynamic website
On 05/06/2011 12:14 PM, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: > Q: How many content management systems written in php does Debian need? > A: How about zero? > > Not exactly helpful. When developers are passionately opposed to a particular technology (and not without reason here, I think,) they can be a bit blunt in expressing it. The list of these goes on and on ... and while I certainly would be more polite myself about expressing reservations about adding any more, I'm not going to fault others for expressing their dissent. The way you expressed your support seemed to me to gloss over the real cost of adding a new package to the archive without any coherent argument as to why this particular one was going to be no trouble at all (and/or worth the trouble because it's so special). Ben -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dc420c1.2080...@debian.org
Bug#625865: ITP: ocportal -- ocPortal is a Content Management System for building and maintaining a dynamic website
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 20:03 +0300, George Danchev wrote: > On Friday 06 May 2011 19:39:26 Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 13:24 -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote: > > > On 05/06/2011 12:14 PM, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: > > > > Q: How many content management systems written in php does Debian need? > > > > A: How about zero? > > > > > > > > Not exactly helpful. > > > > > > When developers are passionately opposed to a particular technology (and > > > not without reason here, I think,) they can be a bit blunt in expressing > > > it. The list of these goes on and on ... and while I certainly would be > > > more polite myself about expressing reservations about adding any more, > > > I'm not going to fault others for expressing their dissent. The way you > > > expressed your support seemed to me to gloss over the real cost of > > > adding a new package to the archive without any coherent argument as to > > > why this particular one was going to be no trouble at all (and/or worth > > > the trouble because it's so special). > > > > Strange that you read 'support' into my responses. Actually I have never > > even heard of the proposed package, but that's not the point. I even > > mentioned that if the package sucketh (if the guy proposing it proves > > unreliable), then it can either remain in Unstable or be removed. > > Upload to 'unstable' and see how it goes could be quite suboptimal tactics > most of the time. I'm not talking about that particular package, but not > every > package which flies in the free software skies deserves to be in Debian > archive > in my own opinion. Inclusions costs human time. I am not opposed to this. But again, that was not the point. Point was automatic 'should not be in Debian' without giving reasons. And if maintainer is willing to be on top of things, what extra work is there for anyone, except those handling NEW? > > You don't just blatantly oppose Debian inclusion without mentioning why. > > The great Josselin Mouette (yes, I really respect this guy for his > > tireless GNOME maintenance) just did that, and the rest of us are > > supposed to magically possess the history of PHP in Debian, and laugh it > > off. > > > > And no, you should fault others for expressing their dissent in this > > unproductive manner. > > Well, maybe if you look at that from a different angle, you can find it > productive as in: don't spend your time packaging that particular one, as > chances are very low for upload. I don't understand what you are saying here. My point was the manner in which the response was made. I used the word 'productive' because the guy wasn't saying why he was objecting to this particular package. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1304703032.20397.27.camel@debian.tauspace.local
Bug#598968: RFP: bsnes -- The most accurate SNES/SuperFamicom emulator
Hi, On 05/06/2011 12:23 PM, Emil Langrock wrote: Isn't it a bit useless to package bsnes? mednafen (in Debian) has bsnes already integrated [1] (afaik also with netplay support). Maybe it would be I don't think it has it integrated: $ mednafen --help | grep -i snes has no output. It doesn't recognize SNES ROM files. $ apt-cache policy mednafen mednafen: Installed: 0.8.D.3-1 Candidate: 0.8.D.3-1 Version table: *** 0.8.D.3-1 0 500 http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/ testing/main amd64 Packages -1 http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/ unstable/main amd64 Packages 500 http://ftp.debian.nl/debian/ testing/main amd64 Packages -1 http://ftp.debian.nl/debian/ unstable/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status -- Grtjs, Manuel PS: MSX FOR EVER! (Questions? http://faq.msxnet.org/ ) PPS: Visit my homepage at http://manuel.msxnet.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dc425b8.9010...@msxnet.org
Bug#609110: Activity
Greetings! Has there been any activity with the packaging of swfupload since the interest in January? I've followed the Git link posted above but cannot see any content, although for all I know this may be a permission issue. I'm asking because I'm working on packaging a CMS called ocPortal (ITP bug #625865 ), which includes swfupload. Obviously it would be better to rely on an external package, but since this ITP's already in the works I thought I'd enquire. Thanks, Chris Waburton -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1304695789.20621.32.camel@linuxfedora
Bug#598968: bsnes and mednafen
The latest stable versions of Mednafen, including the stable and unstable packages in Debian, do not have any SNES support. However, it looks like there is a WIP/Dev version of Medafen that includes bsnes to emulate SNES. Our Debian experimental repository includes a Mednafen WIP version, and looking at Emil's log it looks like the Debian experimental version supports SNES to some degree. I've been using Mednafen for several years. I like it. In the last few weeks I've used it to play Zelda Minish Cap for GBA and Zelda Oracle of Seasons for Gameboy. I didn't know that there were plans to include SNES support before today. The reason I created a bsnes package for Debian and tried to put it in the repositories is because I wanted a great SNES emulator in Debian (zsnes is only OK). I haven't found a Debian Developer who wants the same thing enough to sponsor me, though. Useless? Certainly not. It would be great to see bsnes in Debian, either as its own package or in mednafen. -Brandon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110506120420.5b4fa1af@ALPHA
Bug#625865: ITP: ocportal -- ocPortal is a Content Management System for building and maintaining a dynamic website
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 11:29 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Friday, May 06, 2011 11:23:50 AM Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 09:11 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > > On Friday, May 06, 2011 08:56:21 AM Chris Warburton wrote: > > > > Programming Lang: PHP > > > > Description : ocPortal is a Content Management System for > > > > building > > > > > > > > and maintaining a dynamic website > > > > > > How many content management systems written in php does Debian need? > > > > It's not kool that you didn't even ask about how good it is. Maybe it's > > better than whatever exists in Debian currently, have you checked? My > > point is your question isn't helpful. It smacks of flaming. > > The question I should have asked is what is it's security record like. This > is an area that's rife with applications that have 'poor' security records. > Adding more to that pile would be an unfortunate burden on the security team. > > That's probably the most significant of the project wide costs adding a > package > like this brings with it. Thanks for putting your objection in a more readable/friendly form. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1304697006.20397.12.camel@debian.tauspace.local
Bug#625885: RFP: python-xlutils -- Utilities for working with Excel files that require both xlrd and xlwt
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: python-xlutils Version : 1.4.1 Upstream Author : Chris Withers * URL : http://pypi.python.org/pypi/xlutils * License : MIT Programming Lang: Python Description : Utilities for working with Excel files that require both xlrd and xlwt This package provides a collection of utilities for working with Excel files. Since these utilities may require either or both of the xlrd and xlwt packages, they are collected together here, separate from either package. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110506161253.1035.23592.report...@karuna.ath.cx
Bug#625865: ITP: ocportal -- ocPortal is a Content Management System for building and maintaining a dynamic website
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 13:24 -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote: > On 05/06/2011 12:14 PM, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: > > Q: How many content management systems written in php does Debian need? > > A: How about zero? > > > > Not exactly helpful. > > When developers are passionately opposed to a particular technology (and > not without reason here, I think,) they can be a bit blunt in expressing > it. The list of these goes on and on ... and while I certainly would be > more polite myself about expressing reservations about adding any more, > I'm not going to fault others for expressing their dissent. The way you > expressed your support seemed to me to gloss over the real cost of > adding a new package to the archive without any coherent argument as to > why this particular one was going to be no trouble at all (and/or worth > the trouble because it's so special). Strange that you read 'support' into my responses. Actually I have never even heard of the proposed package, but that's not the point. I even mentioned that if the package sucketh (if the guy proposing it proves unreliable), then it can either remain in Unstable or be removed. You don't just blatantly oppose Debian inclusion without mentioning why. The great Josselin Mouette (yes, I really respect this guy for his tireless GNOME maintenance) just did that, and the rest of us are supposed to magically possess the history of PHP in Debian, and laugh it off. And no, you should fault others for expressing their dissent in this unproductive manner. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1304699966.20397.23.camel@debian.tauspace.local
Bug#625865: ITP: ocportal -- ocPortal is a Content Management System for building and maintaining a dynamic website
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 17:14 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: > On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 11:00 -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote: > > On 05/06/2011 10:49 AM, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: > > > What's up with the hate? It's always convenient to have a package in > > > Debian, instead of hunting for it upstream. If it rots in Debian, then > > > it can easily be removed again (or left in Unstable). > > > > Wrong. Every additional package costs the whole Debian project in > > numerous ways. That's why we have these discussions up front on all > > ITPs, so objections can be voiced. > > Q: How many content management systems written in php does Debian need? > A: How about zero? > > Not exactly helpful. > > That was before discussing if the guy filling the ITP mentioned his > readiness to respond to any RC bugs. > I should probably point out that I am an upstream ocPortal developer, so I should be as capable as anyone in fixing technical bugs, and as a long-time Debian user I don't count Debian bugs as any less important than core ocPortal bugs. With this said, I'm obviously incapable of some things. As an example, ocPortal uses "swfupload" which may require me to wait on ITP bug #609110, although I don't mind taking over its packaging if its activity has ceased (I'm not familiar with the protocol for handling such cases). Thanks, Chris Waburton -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1304696077.20621.37.camel@linuxfedora
Bug#625865: ITP: ocportal -- ocPortal is a Content Management System for building and maintaining a dynamic website
On Friday 06 May 2011 19:39:26 Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: > On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 13:24 -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote: > > On 05/06/2011 12:14 PM, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: > > > Q: How many content management systems written in php does Debian need? > > > A: How about zero? > > > > > > Not exactly helpful. > > > > When developers are passionately opposed to a particular technology (and > > not without reason here, I think,) they can be a bit blunt in expressing > > it. The list of these goes on and on ... and while I certainly would be > > more polite myself about expressing reservations about adding any more, > > I'm not going to fault others for expressing their dissent. The way you > > expressed your support seemed to me to gloss over the real cost of > > adding a new package to the archive without any coherent argument as to > > why this particular one was going to be no trouble at all (and/or worth > > the trouble because it's so special). > > Strange that you read 'support' into my responses. Actually I have never > even heard of the proposed package, but that's not the point. I even > mentioned that if the package sucketh (if the guy proposing it proves > unreliable), then it can either remain in Unstable or be removed. Upload to 'unstable' and see how it goes could be quite suboptimal tactics most of the time. I'm not talking about that particular package, but not every package which flies in the free software skies deserves to be in Debian archive in my own opinion. Inclusions costs human time. > You don't just blatantly oppose Debian inclusion without mentioning why. > The great Josselin Mouette (yes, I really respect this guy for his > tireless GNOME maintenance) just did that, and the rest of us are > supposed to magically possess the history of PHP in Debian, and laugh it > off. > > And no, you should fault others for expressing their dissent in this > unproductive manner. Well, maybe if you look at that from a different angle, you can find it productive as in: don't spend your time packaging that particular one, as chances are very low for upload. -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201105062003.43593.danc...@spnet.net
Processed: ITA: xloadimage -- Graphics file viewer under X11
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 527575 ITA: xloadimage -- Graphics file viewer under X11 Bug #527575 [wnpp] RFA: xloadimage -- Graphics file viewer under X11 Changed Bug title to 'ITA: xloadimage -- Graphics file viewer under X11' from 'RFA: xloadimage -- Graphics file viewer under X11' > owner 527575 m...@vantuyl.us Bug #527575 [wnpp] ITA: xloadimage -- Graphics file viewer under X11 Owner recorded as m...@vantuyl.us. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 527575: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=527575 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130470375017891.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#625865: ITP: ocportal -- ocPortal is a Content Management System for building and maintaining a dynamic website
On Friday, May 06, 2011 11:23:50 AM Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: > On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 09:11 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > On Friday, May 06, 2011 08:56:21 AM Chris Warburton wrote: > > > Programming Lang: PHP > > > Description : ocPortal is a Content Management System for > > > building > > > > > > and maintaining a dynamic website > > > > How many content management systems written in php does Debian need? > > It's not kool that you didn't even ask about how good it is. Maybe it's > better than whatever exists in Debian currently, have you checked? My > point is your question isn't helpful. It smacks of flaming. The question I should have asked is what is it's security record like. This is an area that's rife with applications that have 'poor' security records. Adding more to that pile would be an unfortunate burden on the security team. That's probably the most significant of the project wide costs adding a package like this brings with it. Scott K -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201105061129.34693.deb...@kitterman.com
Bug#598968: RFP: bsnes -- The most accurate SNES/SuperFamicom emulator
On Friday 06 May 2011 18:45:44 Manuel Bilderbeek wrote: > Hi, > > On 05/06/2011 12:23 PM, Emil Langrock wrote: > > Isn't it a bit useless to package bsnes? mednafen (in Debian) has bsnes > > already integrated [1] (afaik also with netplay support). Maybe it would > > be > > I don't think it has it integrated: > > $ mednafen --help | grep -i snes > > has no output. It doesn't recognize SNES ROM files. > > $ apt-cache policy mednafen > mednafen: >Installed: 0.8.D.3-1 >Candidate: 0.8.D.3-1 >Version table: > *** 0.8.D.3-1 0 > 500 http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/ testing/main amd64 Packages > -1 http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/ unstable/main amd64 Packages > 500 http://ftp.debian.nl/debian/ testing/main amd64 Packages > -1 http://ftp.debian.nl/debian/ unstable/main amd64 Packages > 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status It is $ mednafen --help | grep -i snes Internal emulation modules: nes snes gb gba pce pce_fast lynx md pcfx ngp vb wswan sms gg cdplay see the output. And it recognized snes rom files - tried it with 1997\ New\ Year\ FD\ \(PD\).smc $ apt-cache policy mednafen mednafen: Installed: 0.9.17.1-1 Candidate: 0.9.17.1-1 Version table: *** 0.9.17.1-1 0 1 ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/ experimental/main i386 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 0.8.D.3-1 0 500 ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/ sid/main i386 Packages 500 ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/ testing/main i386 Packages -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201105061859.41365.emil.langr...@gmx.de
Bug#625865: ITP: ocportal -- ocPortal is a Content Management System for building and maintaining a dynamic website
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 11:29 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Friday, May 06, 2011 11:23:50 AM Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 09:11 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > > On Friday, May 06, 2011 08:56:21 AM Chris Warburton wrote: > > > > Programming Lang: PHP > > > > Description : ocPortal is a Content Management System for > > > > building > > > > > > > > and maintaining a dynamic website > > > > > > How many content management systems written in php does Debian need? > > > > It's not kool that you didn't even ask about how good it is. Maybe it's > > better than whatever exists in Debian currently, have you checked? My > > point is your question isn't helpful. It smacks of flaming. > > The question I should have asked is what is it's security record like. This > is an area that's rife with applications that have 'poor' security records. > Adding more to that pile would be an unfortunate burden on the security team. > > That's probably the most significant of the project wide costs adding a > package > like this brings with it. > > Scott K Hi Scott. ocPortal isn't massively widespread compared to other systems, so there's obviously less experimental proof of security. We had a security hole a few years ago; this was before I got involved, but there's details here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OcPortal#Criticisms Official ocPortal releases are managed by ocProducts, a company set up around ocPortal (and who pay my salary), and we have a clear security policy which can be found here http://ocportal.com/site/maintenance.htm . We also regularly run static code analysis tools on the codebase and we test every release with a hacked PHP runtime that 1) triggers errors if strings are not explicitly sanitised before going through eval, getting echoed to a browser or being entered into a database, and 2) enforces a type system on variables and function calls (based on type signatures written into the PHPdoc of every function), and raises an error if there is a type mismatch. I actually run this hacked PHP on my system in place of the distro's own. If there are specific security concerns I'd be happy to address them. Thanks, Chris Warburton -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1304697369.20621.51.camel@linuxfedora
Processed: ITA: jzip -- Text mode interpreter for Z-Code adventures
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 487961 ITA: jzip -- Text mode interpreter for Z-Code adventures Bug #487961 [wnpp] O: jzip -- text mode interpreter for Z-Code adventures Changed Bug title to 'ITA: jzip -- Text mode interpreter for Z-Code adventures' from 'O: jzip -- text mode interpreter for Z-Code adventures' > owner 487961 m...@vantuyl.us Bug #487961 [wnpp] ITA: jzip -- Text mode interpreter for Z-Code adventures Owner recorded as m...@vantuyl.us. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 487961: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=487961 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130469738330627.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#625865: ITP: ocportal -- ocPortal is a Content Management System for building and maintaining a dynamic website
On Fri, 06 May 2011, Chris Warburton wrote: > Hi Scott. ocPortal isn't massively widespread compared to other systems, > so there's obviously less experimental proof of security. We had a > security hole a few years ago; this was before I got involved, but > there's details here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OcPortal#Criticisms > > Official ocPortal releases are managed by ocProducts, a company set up > around ocPortal (and who pay my salary), and we have a clear security > policy which can be found here > http://ocportal.com/site/maintenance.htm . > > We also regularly run static code analysis tools on the codebase and we > test every release with a hacked PHP runtime that 1) triggers errors if > strings are not explicitly sanitised before going through eval, getting > echoed to a browser or being entered into a database, and 2) enforces a > type system on variables and function calls (based on type signatures > written into the PHPdoc of every function), and raises an error if there > is a type mismatch. I actually run this hacked PHP on my system in place > of the distro's own. > > If there are specific security concerns I'd be happy to address them. This is a better security policy than most PHP packages we have in the archive. That alone is grounds enough to allow ocportal in IMO. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110506211121.gb7...@khazad-dum.debian.net
Bug#625887: RFP: upskirt -- robust and fast Markdown filter
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: upskirt Version : git commit 7cb1a9e0270952ab6e4d Upstream Author : Natacha Porté, Vicent Martí * URL : https://github.com/tanoku/upskirt * License : MIT Programming Lang: C Description : robust and fast Markdown filter Upskirt The Markdown library that sucks less than your Markdown library Why doesn't Upskirt suck? Markdown is not easy to parse: it's not well standarized, and has a ton of unofficial extensions and corner cases which makes writing a parser for it not trivial. This also makes any Markdown parser or converter inherently sucky. Here's why Upskirt is the least sucky of the Markdown parsers: * If your Markdown library is not standards compliant, Upskirt is. Upskirt passes out of the box the official Markdown v1.0.0 and v1.0.3 test suites, and has been extensively tested with additional corner cases to make sure its output is as sane as possible at all times. * If your Markdown library doesn't support Markdown extensions, Upskirt does. Upskirt has optional support for several (unofficial) Markdown extensions, such as non-strict emphasis, fenced code blocks, tables, autolinks, strikethrough and more. * If your Markdown library is ready to be used in production, you are probably in for a surprise. Upskirt is the only Markdown library ready to be used in a production environment where users can submit arbritrary and potentially malicious contents to render. Upskirt has been extensively security audited, and includes protection against all possible DOS attacks (stack overflows, out of memory situations, malformed Markdown syntax...) and against client attacks through malicious embedded HTML. We've worked very hard to make Upskirt never crash or run out of memory under any input. Upskirt renders all the Markdown content in GitHub and so far hasn't crashed a single time. * If your Markdown library only does HTML, Upskirt does much more. Upskirt is not stuck with XHTML output: the Markdown parser of the library is decoupled from the renderer, so it's trivial to extend the library with custom renderers. A fully functional XHTML renderer is included. * If your Markdown library is slow, Upskirt is not. Upskirt is written in C, with a special emphasis on performance. When wrapped on a dynamic language such as Python or Ruby, it has shown to be up to 40 times faster than other native alternatives. * If your Markdown library has unreasonable dependencies, Upskirt doesn't. Upskirt is a zero-dependency library composed of 3 .c files and their headers. No dependencies, no bullshit. Only standard C99 that builds everywhere. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110506161645.22079.50506.reportbug@localhost.localdomain
Bug#625737: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#625737: ITP: fonts-ricty -- High quality japanse fonts based on Inconsolata and Migu 1M
On 06/05/11 07:02, Christian PERRIER wrote: > Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org): >> Quoting Youhei SASAKI (uwab...@gfd-dennou.org): >>> Package: wnpp >>> Owner: Youhei SASAKI >>> Severity: wishlist >>> >>> * Package name: fonts-ricty >>> Version : 2.0.2 >>> Upstream Author : Yasunori Yusa >>> * URL or Web page : http://save.sys.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~yusa/fonts/ricty.html >>> * License : SIL Open Font License Ver.1.1 and M+ FONTS LICENSE and >>> IPA Font License Agreement v1.0 >>> Description : High quality japanse fonts based on Inconsolata and >>> Migu 1M >> >> Hello Sasaki-san, >> >> Isn't this more or less obsoleting inconsolata? >> >> inconsolata being team-maintained by pkg-fonts, maybe could you join >> the team so that we can easily handle this? > > > Sorry, while the above mail came out, you sent an RFS request to the > pkg-fonts team mailing list. > > Still, I am not sure whether this font package is maintained in the > team's SVN and if you're formally a team member (with commit rights on > Alioth, etc). Hi everyone, It seems there are a number of issues with this ITP: This looks like a branch of Inconsolata. There are other derivative works out there like for example: https://github.com/cosmix/Inconsolata-Hellenic http://nodnod.net/2009/feb/12/adding-straight-single-and-double-quotes-inconsola/ https://build.opensuse.org/package/files?package=inconsolata-fonts&project=home%3Athomas-schraitle Regardless of the quality, coverage or legal soundness of these derivatives, they do not obsolete the main original version (tip) which is still being improved with hinting and display regression fixes for example. (with hopefully a new official release soon). They may be branches which get merged back into trunk (tip) or branches that end up becoming more useful that the original separately but they don't replace the original. AFAICT this derivative called ricty is really a merge of 4 different fonts under different licenses. And not a disjunct of the various licenses. The project-specific and organisation-specific M+ license is really a BSD-like (BTW it is missing a translation for non-Japanese speakers in the source tree). Why not advocate for use of an already established permissive non-copyleft attribution-only license like BSD / MIT instead? This would reduce licensing proliferation and allow increased cross-pollination with compatible projects. I don't know if this is intentional or not but the copyleft aspects of two of the three licensing models have been ignored here: this merge breaches section 5 of the OFL. And also breaches the IPA Font Licensing agreement article 3, 1. 3) (not that the IPA font license is particularly readable... but still). This goes against the author's original wishes in picking these licenses for their creation. You can't merge works coming from two different copyleft licenses together in any meaningful way... How can you satisfy the requirements of these licenses together and keep the project developing in a sane way? This will be very very confusing for designers wanting to build upon this work, not to mention users if Debian lets it go into main. (generally dual-licensing of fonts is a bit of a headache as well and not exactly recommended). This needs to be sorted. Joining the team like Christian suggested sounds like a good way to help do that and take advantage of the collective skill of pkg-fonts. I would respectfully suggest contacting the authors of these fonts to get them to consider licensing compatibility issues and maybe sending their patches upstream for inclusion in the mainline of Inconsolata. Or maybe there are other sets of glyphs from another font that offers the same coverage and quality in a more compatible way for appropriate merging? I freely admit that my knowledge of Japanese is sadly close to zero (I can barely write my own first name) but I'm confident Hideki-san or other Japanese speakers in our team can provide further help with these issues and upstream advocacy if they wish. Looking at all the work in our repository, Hideki-san surely has been quite successful (!) interacting with Japanese designers to get fonts released under licenses Debian users can safely use. HTH, -- Nicolas Spalinger, SIL NRSI volunteer - http://scripts.sil.org Debian fonts task force - http://pkg-fonts.alioth.debian.org Open font community - http://planet.open-fonts.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dc43f91.5020...@sil.org
Bug#625865: ITP: ocportal -- ocPortal is a Content Management System for building and maintaining a dynamic website
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 09:11 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Friday, May 06, 2011 08:56:21 AM Chris Warburton wrote: > > Programming Lang: PHP > > Description : ocPortal is a Content Management System for building > > and maintaining a dynamic website > > How many content management systems written in php does Debian need? It's not kool that you didn't even ask about how good it is. Maybe it's better than whatever exists in Debian currently, have you checked? My point is your question isn't helpful. It smacks of flaming. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1304695430.20397.10.camel@debian.tauspace.local
Bug#625865: ITP: ocportal -- ocPortal is a Content Management System for building and maintaining a dynamic website
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 11:00 -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote: > On 05/06/2011 10:49 AM, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: > > What's up with the hate? It's always convenient to have a package in > > Debian, instead of hunting for it upstream. If it rots in Debian, then > > it can easily be removed again (or left in Unstable). > > Wrong. Every additional package costs the whole Debian project in > numerous ways. That's why we have these discussions up front on all > ITPs, so objections can be voiced. Q: How many content management systems written in php does Debian need? A: How about zero? Not exactly helpful. That was before discussing if the guy filling the ITP mentioned his readiness to respond to any RC bugs. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1304694881.20397.7.camel@debian.tauspace.local
Bug#617578: marked as done (ITA: cvs -- Concurrent Versions System)
Your message dated Sat, 07 May 2011 01:17:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#617578: fixed in cvs 2:1.12.13+real-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #617578,
regarding ITA: cvs -- Concurrent Versions System
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
617578: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=617578
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hi,
I request an adopter for the cvs package.
The package description is:
CVS is a version control system, which allows you to keep old versions
of files (usually source code), keep a log of who, when, and why
changes occurred, etc., like RCS or SCCS. Unlike the simpler systems,
CVS does not just operate on one file at a time or one directory at
a time, but operates on hierarchical collections of directories
consisting of version controlled files.
.
CVS helps to manage releases and to control the concurrent editing of
source files among multiple authors. CVS allows triggers to
enable/log/control various operations and works well over a wide area
network.
I've been doing a mediocre job of maintaining cvs for a long time,
basically keeping it alive on life support but little more. I no
longer use cvs at all, so I should pass the package on to somebody
else who cares (if anybody does).
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: cvs
Source-Version: 2:1.12.13+real-4
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
cvs, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
cvs_1.12.13+real-4.diff.gz
to main/c/cvs/cvs_1.12.13+real-4.diff.gz
cvs_1.12.13+real-4.dsc
to main/c/cvs/cvs_1.12.13+real-4.dsc
cvs_1.12.13+real-4_amd64.deb
to main/c/cvs/cvs_1.12.13+real-4_amd64.deb
cvs_1.12.13+real.orig.tar.gz
to main/c/cvs/cvs_1.12.13+real.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 617...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Thorsten Glaser (supplier of updated cvs package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA384
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 07 May 2011 01:00:39 +
Source: cvs
Binary: cvs
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2:1.12.13+real-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Thorsten Glaser
Changed-By: Thorsten Glaser
Description:
cvs- Concurrent Versions System
Closes: 60800 113809 168300 306354 306432 329151 340984 343169 393436 408117
458864 464134 464137 479752 482301 495938 499790 511643 518600 563856 576035
607297 614700 617578
Changes:
cvs (2:1.12.13+real-4) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Renamed .orig.tar.gz due to archive pathname conflict
* d/README.source: Document patch location (VCS-CVS, VCS-Browser alike)
* New build from MirPorts 1.12.13-10 = MirOS BSD 0AAE.1
- Contains changes from cvs (1:1.12.13-12ubuntu1):
+ Apply fix from Kees Cook to avoid %n in writable memory (LP: #296453)
- Other BTS relevant changes:
+ Allow CVSROOT-less “version” (LP: #97683) and “cvs version”
+ Update loginfo documentation, ‘%{t}’ is indeed gone (Closes: #329151)
+ Lower syslog level from emergency (Closes: #563856)
+ Fix awk substr start argument, thanks John Hughes (Closes: #518600)
+ Rename nodes with colons in them (Closes: #113809)
+ Fix typo (Closes: #464137)
+ Document missing rcs2log(1) options (Closes: #306354) and fix dashes
* Upload new package to Debian unstable (Closes: #306432)
(Closes: #458864) (Closes: #464134) (Closes: #479752)
(Closes: #576035) (Closes: #614700) (Closes: #617578)
- Drop PAM (Closes: #340984) (Closes: #393436)
- No longer installs repositories (Closes: #168300)
(Closes: #408117) (Closes: #482301) (Closes: #499790)
(Closes: #511643) (Closes: #607297)
- Deprecate pserver (Closes: #343169) (Closes: #495938)
- Drop Origin and Bugs headers again (upload to Debian proper)
and old (pre-Debian upload) private repo changelog entries
- Thank you, Steve, for handing over package maintainership!
* Clarify package description (LP: #377411)
* Build with Kerberos V support (Closes: #60800) (LP: #157760)
* Recommends: openssh-client
Bug#624358: ITA: exaile -- flexible audio player, similar to Amarok, but written in GTK+
retitle 624358 ITA: exaile -- flexible audio player, similar to Amarok, but written in GTK+ owner 624358 vincentc1...@gmail.com thanks If nobody else is interested in Exaile, I would like to adopt it. Kind regards, - Vincent -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/BANLkTik=3gp8z_pg3dt02ce-qkz1jrt...@mail.gmail.com
Processed (with 1 errors): Bug #624358
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 624358 ITA: exaile -- flexible audio player, similar to Bug #624358 [wnpp] O: exaile -- flexible audio player, similar to Amarok, but written in GTK+ Changed Bug title to 'ITA: exaile -- flexible audio player, similar to' from 'O: exaile -- flexible audio player, similar to Amarok, but written in GTK+' > Amarok, but written in GTK+ Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > owner 624358 vincentc1...@gmail.com Bug #624358 [wnpp] ITA: exaile -- flexible audio player, similar to Owner recorded as vincentc1...@gmail.com. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 624358: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=624358 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130473897729274.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: Bug #624358
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 624358 ITA: exaile -- flexible, full-featured audio player Bug #624358 [wnpp] ITA: exaile -- flexible audio player, similar to Changed Bug title to 'ITA: exaile -- flexible, full-featured audio player' from 'ITA: exaile -- flexible audio player, similar to' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 624358: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=624358 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13047415814072.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: Bug #613788
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 613788 RFP: dropbox -- secure backup, sync and sharing util Bug #613788 [wnpp] ITP: dropbox -- secure backup, sync and sharing util Changed Bug title to 'RFP: dropbox -- secure backup, sync and sharing util' from 'ITP: dropbox -- secure backup, sync and sharing util' > noowner 613788 Bug #613788 [wnpp] RFP: dropbox -- secure backup, sync and sharing util Removed annotation that Bug was owned by Vincent Cheng . > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 613788: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=613788 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13047418914985.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
