Re: mozilla 1.2.1 packages
2002$BG/(B12$B7n(B06$BF|(B($B6b(B)$B$N(B04$B;~(B24$BJ,$K(B Vineet Kumar $B[)$/(B: (B> Hello Takuo, (B> (B> The following is from a thread on debian-user this morning. We would (B> appreciate any light you can help shed on this subject. (B> (B> * Craig Dickson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [021205 11:14]: (B> > Vineet Kumar wrote: (B> > (B> > > I happily downloaded and installed the new mozilla 1.2.1-1 packages for (B> > > sid this morning, but I notice that "about:", while indicating "Mozilla (B> > > Debian Package 1.2.1" still says "Mozilla 1.2" and (B> > > "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2) Gecko/20021204 Debian/1.2.1-1" (B> > > ^^ (B> > > Is this correct behavior? Is there a way to test whether this version (B> > > is actually 1.2.1 with the DHTML bug fix included? (B> > (B> > Interesting. I have mozilla 1.2.1 on Windows on another machine; its (B> > about box says "1.2.1" and the browser ID string says rv:1.2.1. (B> > (B> > This seems like a question for the mozilla maintainer; file a bug if (B> > you like. (B (BPerhaps, it is upstream problem. (B (B-- (BTakuo KITAME. (B (B (B-- (BTo UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bwith a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mozilla 1.2 and commandline
Fixed in 1.2.1-2. (B (B2002$BG/(B12$B7n(B07$BF|(B($BEZ(B)$B$N(B03$B;~(B23$BJ,$K(B Craig Dickson $B[)$/(B: (B> (CC'd to the mozilla maintainer, Takuo Kitame, since I don't know if (B> he reads debian-user.) (B> (B> John M Flinchbaugh wrote: (B> (B> > i noticed that running `mozilla' a second time pops up the profile (B> > selector, but `mozilla-1.2.1' does the remote thing that just tells (B> > the currently running mozilla to just open a new window. (B> > (B> > can the mozilla script be made to behave like the mozilla-1.2.1 script? (B> (B> I think you're onto something there. Why are there two scripts at all? And (B> why is there now an /etc/alternatives/mozilla entry that is not used by (B> anything, pointing to a non-existent /usr/bin/mozilla-1.2? (B> (B> I suspect that it is supposed to be like this: (B> (B> /usr/bin/mozilla: symlink to /etc/alternatives/mozilla (B> /etc/alternatives/mozilla: symlink to /usr/bin/mozilla-1.2.1 (B> /usr/bin/mozilla-1.2.1:mozilla startup script (B> (B> This seems like it would lead to correct behavior when you run mozilla. (B> (B> Craig (B-- (BTakuo KITAME. (B (B (B-- (BTo UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bwith a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ITP: emacs-dl-wnn, emacs-dl-canna
I intent to package emacs-dl-wnn and emacs-dl-canna They are dl modules for Dynamic Loading extended emacs20 (emacs20-dl) to use Wnn input method and Canna input method. (emacs20-dl will upload soon) License: GPL2 Regards. -- Takuo KITAME [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Y2K fix for emacs19(potato/slink) and emacs20(slink)
Hello. I think that emacs19 19.34(potato/slink) and emacs20 20.3(slink) has the y2k problem in lisp/timezone.el. Are package maintainer or anybody working for fix this? or already fixed? Here is the fixed timezone.el. http://master.debian.org/~kitame/tmp/timezone.el (Thanks TSUCHIYA Masatoshi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> !!) If noboady is working, I'll fix and NMU. Regards. -- Takuo KITAME [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Y2K fix for emacs19(potato/slink) and emacs20(slink)
>>>>> On Wed, 29 Dec 1999 09:52:22 -0700 (MST) >>>>> "RM" == Rick Macdonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote... RM> On 29 Dec 1999, Takuo KITAME wrote: >> I think that emacs19 19.34(potato/slink) and emacs20 20.3(slink) has the y2k >> problem in lisp/timezone.el. >> Are package maintainer or anybody working for fix this? or already fixed? >> >> Here is the fixed timezone.el. >> http://master.debian.org/~kitame/tmp/timezone.el >> (Thanks TSUCHIYA Masatoshi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> !!) RM> I'm running emacs 19.34, compiled back in Sep 1996, on Linux, Solaris and RM> IRIX64. I haven't found a definitive answer as to whether or not it has RM> Y2K problems. RM> Does anybody know if timezone.el is the only problem? for example, please try following code. % emacs19 -no-site-file -q (progn (require 'timezone) (timezone-parse-date "Sat, 1 Jan 00 07:00:00 JST")) ;; then right ( Emacs-20.5 or XEmacs ) -> ["2000" "1" "1" "07:00:00" "JST"] ;; then wrong ( before Emacs-20.4 ) -> ["1900" "1" "1" "07:00:00" "JST"] Note: If you have installed apel-10.0, y2k problem has been fixed with apel's timezone.el. Regards. -- Takuo KITAME [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
