Telnetting to SCO-Unix - terminal emulation problems

2000-02-10 Thread Robert Ruzbacky
Hi!

I can telnet into a SCO 5.0.2 server from linux, but am having problems 
with the terminal emulation when running some programs.  Is there any way 
to fix this?  The best terminal setting seems to be at386 at the moment, 
but some function keys don't work on a certain application.

Some windows applications (eg: NetTerm) have a SCO console terminal 
emulation for both the terminal and keyboard which works well.  James River 
ICETCP can emulate SCO ansi and wyse60 terminals.  Are there any programs 
available for debian like these?

Rob...
  
--
http://www.mikka.net.au/~cyberruz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Based On

2000-02-10 Thread Robert Ruzbacky
Yes,

Corel has apparently based their flavour of linux on debian as well!!

Rob...
--
http://www.mikka.net.au/~cyberruz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





-Original Message-
From:   TroPeek [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:   Wednesday, 2 February 2000 7:54 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject:Based On

Hi,

Is it there any other Linux Distribution based on Debian, besides Storm Linux 
2000?

TIA-Pee
 << File: ATT00010.html >> 


Email problems - qmail

2000-02-10 Thread Robert Ruzbacky
I am using the qmail mail server and only some users cannot send e-mail to 
me.  I can send mail to these users without any problems.  One of them got 
the following message:

The message could not be sent because one of the recipients was rejected by 
>the
>server. The rejected email address was "**yours***". blah blah blah.
>... Server error 550. Error no 0x800CCC79

Also, I found the following in my logs that could contribute to the 
problem:

Feb  3 14:46:33 ns tcp-env[20129]: warning: /etc/hosts.allow, line 11:
can't verify hostname: gethostbyname(mail.hbhholdings.co.uk) failed
Feb  3 14:46:33 ns tcp-env[20129]: refused connect from 193.116.26.2

I tried the command host 193.116.26.2, but it did give me the host above 
correctly!

I tried to edit the /etc/hosts.allow file, but everything seems OK.  I am 
giving access to a few addresses outside and line 11 contains the line 
  .mydomain.com.au

The /etc/hosts.deny has the only line as   ALL:PARANOID.

Can anyone suggest what is causing both problems and how to fix them?  I am 
running the server via a 56K modem (permanent connection).

Thanks!


Rob...
  
--
http://www.mikka.net.au/~cyberruz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Fw: downloading with dselect??

2001-06-18 Thread Robert Ruzbacky


> On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 05:02:39PM +0200, pReJkEr wrote:
> > Ello
> >
> >   that manual for dselect is not well written ;[[
> >   how to download with dselect only libc6 and all the packages
> >   that libc6 require? when i press + on the numpad it adds more
> >   packages that are needed (i think ;])...
>

you could also try to use dpkg -i 
after you download the libc6 library file.  It will let
you know if it depends on something and then you install the next file it
asks for using the dpkg -i again.

(It worked for me when dselect didn't
work when upgrading from a previous version of debian to potato.  After
installing libc6, I could install the rest of
the packages without to much trouble)

rob...



Fw: Installing Debian on a Red Hat system over the Internet?

2001-06-18 Thread Robert Ruzbacky



> On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Nicolas Parody wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > My co-located server at my provider runs, and only supports Red Hat but
> > I would like to switch to Debian. Is it possible to install Debian on
> > this system without physical access (The server is in Texas and I am in
> > Germany)? Has anyone already done this and what is your experience?


One way to do it is to install debian on a separate hard drive and configure
the system and the kernel to run on the overseas server.  Then ship the hard
drive overseas and get someone to install it on the system.  Then you should
be able to log into the system and add any other programs or configure the
system futher.

I had a problem where I had to fly interstate to fix a hard disk crash, but
in hindsight could have done the above from a backup I had.

I don't know if you can convert from redhat to debian...in theory you should
be able to...but I can imagine the headaches!!  Probably you are better off
doing a fresh install.  I had enough troubles upgrading from debian 1.3 to
debian 2.2.

Rob...



Setting up mail

2001-06-07 Thread Robert Ruzbacky



Hi!
 
I have tried to setup qmail on a 
new server but get errors when retrieving or sending email via outlook 
express in Windows (via a workstation).  It gives "cannot open socket" on 
both SMTP and POP.  Anyone know which files to change or where to look for 
info?
 
I had tried backing up the old server running 
debian 1.3 and doing a tar cvfp and then restoring it on a new machine 
(installed debian 1.3 first).   Everything worked fine (ie. web 
browsing / hosting / DNS) except the qmail problem, although I could send email 
via elq but could not retrieve new messages.  I tried to telnet into the 
machine using the SMTP port, but could not.  On the old machine, I could 
log in and noticed that a qmail "popper" came up when checking the processes, 
but am still stumped!!
 
I am attempting to upgrade ultimately to debian 
2.2, but want to do this on another hard drive, hence the backup / 
restore.
 
Regards,
 
Rob..


Re. Total Confusion

2001-06-07 Thread Robert Ruzbacky
In your /etc/ppp/options file, try changing auth to noauth.  This means you
don't have to authenticate yourself to the server.


Rob..

- Original Message -
From: "Sidney Brooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 4:18 AM
Subject: Re. Total Confusion


> Eamon Roque asked:
>
> Nonetheless: what does your authentification process look like? Do you
> require the host to authenticate itself, do you agree on a protocol (
> usually in /etc/ppp/options )?
>
> The following is a list of uncommented things in /etc/ppp/options:
> auth
> crtscts
> modem
> proxyarp
> lcp-echo-interval 30
> lcp-echo-failure 4
> noipx
>
> Everything esle in this file is commented, hence not operative.
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>



Re: debian on a 486

2001-06-10 Thread Robert Ruzbacky

- Original Message -
From: "Matt Gerginski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 11:30 AM
Subject: debian on a 486


> Hi.  I want to put debian on a 486 that I recently got from my school.
.
.
> > for the boot disk, or find an older debian boot disk and hope it works
> with the machine and still works with the debian installation process.

You could try using an old version of debian like debian 1.3 (Bo).  I think
you can get it in the archivesit should work fine for a 486.  Mine came
with a rescue disk which I booted from and then it installed the rest via
the CD.  Then you should be able to upgrade your system to the latest debian
and build the kernel that you want.

It's strange that you can't install the latest debian...have you tried just
booting from the CD (assuming you have a bootable distribution off a CD).?
Don't know if your 486 BIOS can support it.

Rob..





Re: bash: fork: Resource temporarily unavailable (ssh)

2001-06-12 Thread Robert Ruzbacky
Yes,

I got the same message with our server.  I had to kill all the ssh sessions
that "didn't exist".

I also had a problem with ssh which asked me to create more pttys, which I
did and this also alleviated the problemnot sure why ssh (I think v 1.3)
does this (ie creates phantom processes when the user had already logged
out)

Rob...



- Original Message -
From: "Andrei Ivanov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Imre Vida" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: 
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2001 5:44 AM
Subject: Re: bash: fork: Resource temporarily unavailable


> > Hi,
> >
> > i seem to have a  problem with my Debian box.
> >
> > When i try to login to it using ssh it accepts
> > the  login but then instead of the bash prompt
> > i get the following erromsg:
> >
> > bash: fork: Resource temporarily unavailable
> >
> > This has never happened before and i didn't
> > anything in the  configuration since my last remote login.
> >
> > What could be the problem?
> >
> > imre
>
> I've seen this before, and it has got something to do with too many
> processes running on the system, eating up the file descriptor table. We
> had a system in the office that had 50-some instances of a process
> running, and were getting this message (I believe). Please correct me if
> I'm wrong.
> Andrei