Re: Backup Consensus?
Is there a place where a general consensus has been reached on exactly what is necesary to backup a Debian system? I'm sure this has been asked and answered many times before, so I am looking for URLs to where this has been discussed in the past. I apologize in advance, but I'm not a subscriber of this list. Please cc me on replies. Thank you very much, -- -- Grant Bowman<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: screen messes up ncurses
* Juergen Fiedler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020507 09:23]: > On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 04:54:49PM -0500, dman wrote: > > gnome-terminal doesn't draw the line-drawing characters correctly. > > It's why I (sometimes) have 'ascii_chars' set in mutt. > > gnome-terminal draws the line characters correctly when I'm not using > screen - that's the weird part. Try this in your .screenrc defbce on term screen-bce -- -- Grant Bowman<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Maildir use with Mutt
Hi all. I'm a procmail and mutt user. I'm converting to maildir format instead of mbox and noticed most of my messages show 0 size now. Is there a procmail recipe to add this information back into it so it's usuable by mutt? Second question: when I use Procmail and forget the / on the end of the mailbox name I get the messages delivered to the folder but not so they are usable. What's the best way to get them re-delivered properly? I know, I should RTFM or STFW, but I'm hoping others on this list have dealt with these problems too. Thanks, -- -- Grant Bowman<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Debian take on UnitedLinux?
* Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020531 10:01]: > On Fri, 2002-05-31 at 11:26, Rick Macdonald wrote: > > Paul Johnson said: > > > On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 09:02:27AM -0600, Rick Macdonald wrote: > > >> Has there been any Debian disscussion about this, official or > > >> otherwise? > > > > > > Why should there be? We are already the One True Linux Distribution. > > > 8:o) > > > > I wrote to Caldera asking if UnitedLinux is Debian based like their > > OpenLinux. > > ...RickM... > > Dime to a dollar it will be RPM-based (SuSE, Connectiva & Turbo- > Linux already are), and use Connectiva's RPM apt-get hack. > > Is there a url describing Debian 3.0's conformance with or > roadway to conformance with the LSB? Great question. I brought this up in November on debian-policy and got nowhere. There is officially no policy at the moment, but not due to my lack of effort. Peace, -- -- Grant Bowman<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Debian take on UnitedLinux?
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020531 10:15]: > Ron Johnson wrote: > > Is there a url describing Debian 3.0's conformance with or > > roadway to conformance with the LSB? > > http://people.debian.org/~taggart/lsb/ > http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/lsbtest/ looked at ~taggart/lsb/ lately? It seems to me a link is missing unless it should be to your page, Joey. -- -- Grant Bowman<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Debian take on UnitedLinux?
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020531 11:47]: > Grant Bowman wrote: > > * Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020531 10:15]: > > > Ron Johnson wrote: > > > > Is there a url describing Debian 3.0's conformance with or > > > > roadway to conformance with the LSB? > > > > > > http://people.debian.org/~taggart/lsb/ > > > http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/lsbtest/ > > > > looked at ~taggart/lsb/ lately? It seems to me a link is missing unless > > it should be to your page, Joey. > > What, it links to the old version of his page, and mention's woody's lsb > package, which contains current information of everything that used to > be on that page. Read. OH, taggart moved the pages into the PACKAGE. I incorrectly read this as page and didn't understand what "Debian lsb page" was being referenced. Why would you move web pages into a package and remove them from the web? It's just an extra step for those surfing for this info. I already have the package installed. Sorry, -- -- Grant Bowman<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Calendar/scheduling softwae fro debain?
Very interesting discussion. I have a list of groupware products on my webpage: http://www.grantbow.com/groupware.html I know that phpGroupware has a functional calendar server. There has been much discussion about it on the OpenOffice.org mail list. More info is available at: http://whiteboard.openoffice.org/groupware/ I will review this thread and add the links that were mentioned to my groupware page, looks like some great projects that I wasn't aware of. Cheers, -- -- Grant Bowman<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Calendar/scheduling softwae fro debain?
Karsten, You might be interested to know that twiki is now (as of two days ago) a packaged Debian app in unstable! Cheers, -- -- Grant Bowman<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
