Re: changing partition size

1998-07-28 Thread Gerald V. Livingston lI
Create the extra space as a separate partition the use RAID LINEAR to 
join the two partitions into one, or simply move some of your current 
directories to the new space and symlink to them from /.

On 28 Jul 98 at 18:57, debian-user@lists.debian.org wrote:

> Hi !
> Is there a command to change (increase) the linux partition over
> unallocated place on the hard disk ? My problem is that I dedicated
> too little place to the linux partition at the installation. I've
> jus't installed Hamm, Xwindow, and part of teTex so I would better
> not be obliged to do it all again. 
> 
> Or there may be a program similar to fips which I used to shrunk my
> dos partition, working under linux ? Also, the available space on
> the hard disk will be right before the Linux partition. Will I have
> a problem with Lilo, will I need to reinstall it on the first block
> of the partition or something like that ?

Gerald V. Livingston II

'69 Bug -- AirBall


--  
Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null


touching file dates

1998-07-29 Thread Gerald V. Livingston lI
I pulled most of the HAMM binaries via ftp under Win95.  Now that I 
have installed HAMM and moved the files to a proper set of 
directories under my ext2fs the file dates are the dates I pulled 
them down, NOT the dates from the ftp site where I got them 
(ftp.de.debian.org).  Now that I'm trying to mirror the binaries with 
fmirror, it wants to get EVERYTHING because the file dayes are so 
mismatched.  I've set up my config files to ignore the file time/date 
if its within at least roughly  seconds ;-) but I'd 
rather correct the dates on my system without downloading the whole 
800+meg (at 33.6) again.

  Any way to touch file dates to match those on a remote (ftp 
-- no login) system?

Gerald V. Livingston II

'69 Bug -- AirBall


--  
Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null


Re: touching file dates

1998-08-02 Thread Gerald V. Livingston lI
  I'm punching this back out in case it was somehow missed in the 
flood.  Any answers other than pulling a file list from the 
FTP site, printing it out, then manually touching the dates of 
hundreds of files one at a time?

On 29 Jul 98 at 0:33, debian-user@lists.debian.org wrote:

> I pulled most of the HAMM binaries via ftp under Win95.  Now that I
> have installed HAMM and moved the files to a proper set of
> directories under my ext2fs the file dates are the dates I pulled
> them down, NOT the dates from the ftp site where I got them
> (ftp.de.debian.org).  Now that I'm trying to mirror the binaries
> with fmirror, it wants to get EVERYTHING because the file dayes are
> so mismatched.  I've set up my config files to ignore the file
> time/date if its within at least roughly  seconds
> ;-) but I'd rather correct the dates on my system without
> downloading the whole 800+meg (at 33.6) again.
> 
>   Any way to touch file dates to match those on a remote (ftp 
> -- no login) system?
> 
> Gerald V. Livingston II

Gerald V. Livingston II

'69 Bug -- AirBall


--  
Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null


bo or hamm?

1998-06-09 Thread Gerald V. Livingston lI
  I have bo on CD.  I'm about to install a new system.  Destroying 
the system and rebuilding from scratch doesn't bother me as it's my 
home system.

In the lists opinion, should I go ahead and re-install bo now, or 
wait for a hamm CD?


Gerald V. Livingston II

'69 Bug -- AirBall


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


serving a win95 box

1998-06-16 Thread Gerald V. Livingston lI
Can a linux box be used to serve a Win95 box the same way two Win95 
boxes can be hooked up together? Eg. -- can linux be set up in such a 
way that an ethernet connected Win95 box can 'see' some of the linux 
drives  in its "Network Neighborhood" box, map them with drive 
letters, and run to programs in those directories as if they were on 
the Win95 box itself?

  I'm setting up a second system for the family but have quite a bit 
of 'extra' HD space on my own box.  Would like to use some of my 
space to store programs for the second box.

Gerald V. Livingston II

'69 Bug -- AirBall


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-post_data

1998-07-10 Thread Gerald V. Livingston lI
This isn't debian specific, but what the hey.

How does one find out the format needed to use the -post_data switch 
in LYNX to feed data to a remote CGI using a script?

(I have a list of addresses I want to process for ZIP+4 zip codes 
through the form located at 

http://www.usps.com/ncsc/lookups/lookup_zip+4.html 

The form posts to: 

http://www.usps.com/cgi-bin/zip4/zip4inq

and I'd like to read from a text file and feed it directly, and 
retrieve the output to another file).


Gerald V. Livingston II

'69 Bug -- AirBall


--  
Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null


_lynx_ post-data

1998-07-10 Thread Gerald V. Livingston lI
This isn't debian specific, but what the hey.

How does one find out the format needed to use the '-post_data' 
switch in LYNX to feed data to a remote CGI using a script?

(I have a list of addresses I want to process for ZIP+4 zip codes
through the form located at 

http://www.usps.com/ncsc/lookups/lookup_zip+4.html 

The form posts to: 

http://www.usps.com/cgi-bin/zip4/zip4inq

and I'd like to read from a text file and feed it directly, and 
retrieve the output to another file).

Gerald V. Livingston II

'69 Bug -- AirBall


--  
Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null


Re: hda1 problem

1998-07-12 Thread Gerald V. Livingston lI
On 11 Jul 98 at 14:34, debian-user@lists.debian.org wrote:

> Hello:
> 
> I had a nicely working system with
> hda1  1 gig /
> hda2  48M   swap
> hda3  1 gig formatted space as /extra
> hda4  extended
> hda52 gigs formatted space unmounted
> 
> The root partition was getting used up so
> I tried to put /usr on hda3 using  
> 'cp -dpRv * /extra' and it appears it went 
> successfully.  I changed the original /usr
> to /usr1 and then /extra to /usr.  Now I have
> two problems:

A slightly more clear answer about 'cp' copying /extra into the new 
/extra/extra.

Shouldn't that have been  'cp -dpRv /usr/* /extra'??

If you really did use just 'cp * /extra' then you should know that 
mounted filesystems show up under '/' --- it copied everything in 
'/boot, /home, /"whatever"' until it reached '/extra'. Then it copied 
it all over again in '/extra/extra'.  Since both were 1gig, I'll bet 
the new /sur (old /extra) really IS full.

PLUS! -- your new /usr insn't JUST /usr. it's really all of '/', 
which isn't what you wanted.

I'd suggest getting logged in as root, umount the new /usr and 
re-mount it as /extra, and rename /usr1 back to /usr.  Then try 
again.  First cd /extra and 'rm -rf' or umount it and mkext2fs 
/dev/hda3 (safer than rm -rf if you're sure you want a whole 
partition empty -- no way for a link to send you back into the '/' 
filesystem).  Then mount it and use 'cp -dpRv /usr/* /extra'  EVEN IF 
YOU ARE SITTING IN '/usr' WHEN YOU START THE COPY! 

   Then again try renaming /usr to /usr1 and umount /extra -- mount 
/dev/hda3 /usr

> 1. xdm won't let me log in as anything but root
> 2. hda1 partition now shows 0 MB available and 
>100 percent usage.  du shows the same amount
>of space being used in /usr and the copied 
>partition.

As the other responder said, you probably DID fill up the new /usr 
with the 'cp' command, and your first drive hit its limit at about 
the same time.  You may have to operate as root until you are certain 
everything (/usr) is in the right place, then delete the contents of 
'/usr1' to get back to normal.  You might also want to temporarily 
kill xdm and do all of this file system swapping from the command 
line with all but absolutely necessary processes killed to be sure no 
files are being accessed when you do the actual name change from /usr 
to /usr1.  There will be a period with no /usr at all while you mount 
/dev/hda3.

Gerald V. Livingston II

'69 Bug -- AirBall


--  
Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null


Re: HTML in e-mail

1998-07-12 Thread Gerald V. Livingston lI
This is old, but I've just gotten down to about 5000 unread messages 
in debian-user from 9000+, reading threaded by subject .

   Have one of your people send YOU an email with OutLook or NetScape 
that contains HTML.  Chop the headers out of that and use your script 
to prepend the headers to your text/html files.

Here are the relevant parts from an html message I found in the list. 
 Note that it sends plain text as the first part of the message then 
html as the second part.  Your mail should decide which is 
appropriate to view.  You should need only the 'Content-Type: 
text/html;' part to send only html. 

Mail readers may also look for the META tags in the html source so 
you may want to include that.

>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> boundary="=_NextPart_000_0009_01BD7858.393260E0"
>X-Priority: 3
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.71.1712.3
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.1712.3
>Resent-Message-ID: <"tpNBYD.A.uxG.BC1T1"@murphy>
>Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>X-Mailing-List:  archive/latest/5168
>X-Loop: debian-user@lists.debian.org Precedence: list Resent-Sender:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status: OR
>
>Dit is een meerdelig bericht in MIME-indeling.
>
>--=_NextPart_000_0009_01BD7858.393260E0
>Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>Hello,
>
>I bought the linux debian distribution on cd,(workgroup solutions 
>inc)= but i have problems installing it.
>
[--SNIP--]
>
>--=_NextPart_000_0009_01BD7858.393260E0
>Content-Type: text/html;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>
>
>
>
>http-equiv=Content-Type>
>
>
>
>
>Hello,
>I bought the linux debian 
>distribution on =
>
>

On  2 May 98 at 14:08, debian-user@lists.debian.org wrote:

> 
> First off, no "flame-mail" please 
> 
> I've got a Linux system here at work that's used for diald/ipmasq
> access to the Internet for our LAN.  Anyway, I've written a bunch of
> Perl scripts that grep log files and create some reports that are
> then mailed to several people on the LAN that have an interest
> 
> Anyway, they've all been happy with those, but now, with the advent
> of HTML e-mail, they're now requesting that I rewrite things so that
> they get my e-mail reports in HTML format.  i.e. they want the
> "prettied up".
> 
> My question is...  Where do I go for info on how to do this?
> 
> Right now, my Perl scripts just build a text file and then use
> `mail` to send the file to multiple recipients  I've looked at
> HTML e-mail messages and it's special header info that defines the
> message as being in HTML format. So...
> 
> How do I send an e-mail message with the new/custom header that
> defines the message as being in HTML format.  (Just sending HTML
> code as the body of the message doesn't work - I've tried)
> 
> Thanks for any help you can provide.
> 
> Later,
> Kevin Traas
> 
> 
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

Gerald V. Livingston II

'69 Bug -- AirBall


--  
Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null


Unidentified subject!

1998-03-18 Thread Gerald V. Livingston lI


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Unidentified subject!

1998-03-18 Thread Gerald V. Livingston lI


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Gateway/Router for WIN machines

1998-03-21 Thread Gerald V. Livingston lI
  I have some freinds who want to be able to connect their several
Win95 machines together for gaming purposes, without going through the
internet.  There are 8 machines at one location and 2 at another. 
 I opened my big mouth and suggested setting up some "outdated" 
hardware they have (P-166 setups -- old news for hardcore game fans)
as linux routers (one at each location) to create a mini intranet.
They already have the machines at each location set up in a win95
peer-to-peer network, but only two machines can game against each
other at a time.  I believe this is because the poor Win networking is
not routing all of the protocols.  

   My questions since I'll have to hel.  Will I need a router at BOTH
ends of the link? Can I set up the linux boxes to route for the whole
network (at each location) to the internet if desired?

  And last, what, other than the NAG, should I get my hands on as far
as documentation is concerned to set up a linux box to be nothing
other than a network gateway/router for a bunch of WinDoze boxes. I've
never done it so I need as much of a "step-by-step as is available.

   Please reply to me and CC: the list as I am roughly 3000 messages
behind in reading the list due to a new job with rather odd hours.
Gerald V. Livingston II

Reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: How to share files with Win95 or NT

1998-01-29 Thread Gerald V. Livingston lI
  This was suggested in another message --- but not clearly.

   You say you have a shared WIN95 box with a CD available.  I assume 
it is on the same side of the firewall as you -- meaning you would 
not have to go through your proxy server to *FTP* to that WIN95 
machine.

  So, get a FTP daemon for WIN95 (I suggest WAR-FTPD -- 100%free 
software) and set that up.  Make sure you set yourself up a user 
account on the new FTP server that has access to the CD-ROM as one of 
its directories.  Now use dselect in FTP mode (in house, direct -- 
not through the proxy server).

On 21 Jan 98 at 13:48, debian-user@lists.debian.org wrote:

> See, the problem is I have a computer with no CD.  I have a network
> card and I am behind a corporate fire wall.  I can not get dselect
> to work  through my firewall so I thought if I set up a CD on a
> win95 box as shareable then I might get dselect to work that way.
> 
> But I don't have samba on this box,  I just have the basic install
> files.
> 
> 
> *** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
> 
> On 1/21/98, at 2:30 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
> 
> >Cox wrote:
> >> 
> >> How do I get files off Win NT or 95 machines across my LAN.
> >> 
> >> I have TCP/IP running.
> >
> >Install samba and use smbclient to go to your share on the box.
> >Or, compile the kernel with smb support and use smbmount to mount
> >the remote share locally.
> >
> >Tim
> >
> >-- 
> > (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] / (home) [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 
> > http://www.buoy.com/~tps
> >  Madness takes its toll...
> >  Please have exact change!
> >** Disclaimer: My views/comments/beliefs, as strange as they are, are my 
> >own.**
> 
> 
> --
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe"
> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble?  e-mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
> 
Gerald V. Livingston II

'69 Bug (no name yet)


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Winmodem

1997-07-12 Thread Gerald V. Livingston lI
On 11 Jul 97 at 16:49, debian-user@lists.debian.org wrote:

> From:  pixar.com!bruce (Bruce Perens) 

> By the way, if the manufacturer had not gone out of their way to
> make it impossible for us to support, we would support the winmodem.
> 
> They don't use the standard interface.
> They won't disclose the details of the interface.
> They won't write a device driver of their own.

  There is probably MAJOR financial uhh -- 'support' -- from a 
certain Mr. Gates which assists these hardware manufacturere in 
maintaing their eat  attitude toward other platforms.

  I personally, however, suggest that anyone stuck with a winmodem as 
part of a system purchase threaten to return the whole system unless 
you are given a real modem.  If you bought it yourself, try to return 
it and pay the difference for a real modem.  

  I still don't understand the reasoning behind moving hardware 
functions into software.  Maybe I'm paranoid (-; but it all seems 
like a plot to force consumers to purchase upgraded machines.  It 
really looks like the reasoning goes this way: "Well, it looks like 
processors are finally fast enough to do whatever the consumer wants 
at an acceptable speed  So, what can we do to slow them down so 
they'll need faster CPU's next year?"

   Maybe 3Com will be more forthcoming with the info now that they 
have eaten USR?
Gerald V. Livingston II

Reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: .login

1997-07-19 Thread Gerald V. Livingston lI
  Stupid would have been not asking.

> On Thu, 17 Jul 1997, Syrus Nemat-Nasser wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 17 Jul 1997, Lazar Fleysher wrote:

> > mv .bash_login .bash_profile
 
> THANKS, I can not beleive how stupid I am.
 
Gerald V. Livingston II

Reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .