Re: win95files names
On Wed, Nov 10, 1999 at 06:56:35AM -0500, Antonio Rodriguez wrote: > How should I mount a win9* system, so that I can read the full file name > without the funny ~1 thing? > I have tried "mount -t msdos ", but this truncates the name to *~1. > I have a few linux files that I want to be able to recognize from the > linux partition. > Thanks, > antonio. Try "mount -t vfat". Bye, Andreas
Re: slink and xfree86 3.3.5 questions
Try adding the following line to your /etc/apt/sources.list: deb http://www.debian.org/~vincent xfree-update main Then "apt-get update" and "apt-get upgrade" and you will get the XFree86 3.3.5 update for slink. Bye Andreas On Tue, Nov 30, 1999 at 12:06:48PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Ok, I installed debian on my system a few weeks ago with a slink > cdrom. There has been some indication that some misbehavior by my > Number Nine card might be because I'm not using XFree86 3.3.5 > To put that on my system would I be leaving slink territory and > heading into potato territory? Would it be best for now (if I'm not > interested in totally upgrading to potato at this time) to maybe just > swap the Number Nine out for the ET4000 I've got kicking around > somewhere? > Alice M. Pinard > Casco Indemnity Company > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- > Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null >
Re: Can't mount cd when using SCSI emulation
On Sat, Jul 15, 2000 at 11:51:16PM +0300, Esko Lehtonen wrote: > Hello! > > I have internal HP 7200 atapi cd-rw drive in my debian 2.2 machine. I am > using self compiled 2.2.14 kernel from debian kernel package. I want to > write cds with my drive, so I removed IDE/ATAPI cd support from kernel, > and compiled > scsi emulation instead. Now I can write cds, but I can't mount any. If I > try: > 'mount /dev/hdc /cdrom' I get: > > /dev/cdrom: Input/output error > mount: you must specify the filesystem type > > Using 'mount /dev/hdc -t iso9660 /cdrom' gives me: > > mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hdc, >or too many mounted file systems > > Using 'mount /dev/scd0 -t iso9660 /cdrom' gives me: > mount: the kernel does not recognize /dev/scd0 as a block device >(maybe `insmod driver'?) > ... snipp ... Hello, make sure the modules for ide-scsi emulation are loaded before mounting the cd. One way to load the modules is manually by using the command modprobe ide-scsi To automate the loading of the modules put the following lines in a file, e.g. idescsi.mod, in the directory /etc/modutils/ : # from the CD-Writing-HOWTO alias scd0 sr_mod# load sr_mod upon access of scd0 pre-install sg modprobe ide-scsi # before sg, load ide-scsi pre-install sr_mod modprobe ide-scsi # before sr_mod, load ide-scsi and run update-modules. This will put these lines in the config file /etc/modules.conf for the kernel module loader. Sadly there is one point I don't know: how to tell kmod to use the new configuration file. Of course a reboot will do the job (but that's like working with a crappy Windows machine :-( - I'm sure there is a better way to do this under Linux - because everything works better with Linux :-) Bye Andreas
Re: freeze when mounting cd image using loop
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 06:43:01AM -0500, Chun Kit Edwin Lau wrote: > Hi > > I am having trouble trying to mount a cd image with the command > > mount -t iso9660 -o ro,loop=/dev/loop0 cd_image /cdrom > > I insert the loop module beforehand, but then the mount command just > freezed at the prompt. (not the system) and I tried to umount it. again the > command freezed. I tried to kill it with -9. and I can't kill it. when I > try to do a ps ax it showed up with a status of DL. when I tried to > shutdown the system, it freezed the shutdown (shutdown incorrectly) > Someone know what's happening? > > Edwin Lau ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > Hi Edwin, today I had exactly the same problem on my potato box with kernel version 2.4.2. So I tried to reboot with kernel 2.2.18 and it worked without any problems. I'm afraid there is something wrong with the loop module in kernel 2.4.2 or maybe an incompatibility with the version of mount from potato. Bye Andreas Schmidt
Re: freeze when mounting cd image using loop
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 07:50:17PM -0500, S . Salman Ahmed wrote: > >>>>> "Andreas" == Andreas Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Andreas> Hi Edwin, > Andreas> > Andreas> today I had exactly the same problem on my potato box with > Andreas> kernel version 2.4.2. So I tried to reboot with kernel > Andreas> 2.2.18 and it worked without any problems. I'm afraid there > Andreas> is something wrong with the loop module in kernel 2.4.2 or > Andreas> maybe an incompatibility with the version of mount from > Andreas> potato. > Andreas> > > Loopback device support is currently broken in 2.4.2. Trying to mount an > ISO image using the loopback device will hang mount so badly that even > kill -9 on it won't work. > > The bug has been fixed though, in either the ac3 or ac4 patch. > > -- > Salman Ahmed > ssahmed AT pathcom DOT com > I've just downloaded the ac6-patch for kernel 2.4.2 from ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4 and compiled a new kernel. The loopback device support is working again. Thanks for your help. Bye Andreas Schmidt
apt-get from apt-move mirror doesn't update binary-all packages
Hello everybody, I'm using apt-move to build a local mirror for the packages in my apt-get archive cache. When I upgrade the packages on another machine in my home network with "apt-get update" and "apt-get dist-upgrade" only the packages from the binary-i386 branch are upgraded but the packages from the binary-all branch are left out. While searching for the reason of this behaviour I found out this: 1. There are packages under the tree debian/dists/potato/main/binary-all, but there is no Packages.gz as under .../main/binary-i386. 2. There are some newer packages under binary-all than on the machine I'm trying to upgrade (debconf 0.2.80.16 for example - I've version 0.2.80.17 in the local mirror). 3. I've tried to manually build the missing Packages.gz with "dpkg-scanpackages dists/potato/main/binary-all /dev/null > \ dists/potato/main/binary-all/Packages" and "gzip Packages". But apt-get still doesn't upgrade the binary-all packages. So every help with this problem would be appreciated. As additional information here are some snippets from my configuration files. /etc/apt-move.conf: -- ARCH=i386 LOCALDIR=/usr/local/wartung/mirrors/debian DEBSTABLE= DEBUNSTABLE= DEBFROZEN= DIST=potato PKGTYPE=both SECTIONS="main non-US/main" USSITE=ftp.de.debian.org NONUSSITE=non-us.debian.org FILECACHE=/var/cache/apt/archives LISTSTATE=/var/state/apt/lists DELETE=no MAXDELETE=20 LOGFILE=/var/log/apt-move.log MONITOR=/dev/null /etc/apt/sources-list (on the machine I'm trying to upgrade): deb file:/mnt/nfs_wartung/mirrors/debian potato main deb file:/mnt/nfs_wartung/mirrors/debian potato/non-US main Bye Andreas
Re: apt-get from apt-move mirror doesn't update binary-all packages (SOLVED)
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 07:55:44PM +0100, Andreas Schmidt wrote: > Hello everybody, Today I compared the structure of the Debian ftp site with my local apt-move mirror and found the reason for my problem. > I'm using apt-move to build a local mirror for the packages in my apt-get > archive cache. When I upgrade the packages on another machine in my > home network with "apt-get update" and "apt-get dist-upgrade" only the > packages from the binary-i386 branch are upgraded but the packages from > the binary-all branch are left out. > > While searching for the reason of this behaviour I found out this: > > 1. There are packages under the tree debian/dists/potato/main/binary-all, >but there is no Packages.gz as under .../main/binary-i386. On the ftp site there isn't a Packages.gz under .../binary-all either. Instead the packages from binary-all are listed in the Packages.gz from .../binary-i386 (or in general from .../binary-$ARCH). In the Packages.gz built by apt-move under .../binary-i386 the packages from binary-all are missing. So I built the Packages file for binary-all and binary-i386 manually with dpkg-scanpackages and merged them into a compound Packages.gz under .../binary-i386. Now an apt-get on a remote machine (via NFS) is upgrading the binary-all packages, too. Bye Andreas
Re: Q about netscape 4.7 and slink
Hello Alice,
to install/run netscape 4.7 from the downloaded tar.gz file you don't need
any of the Debian netscape packages. Here are the steps I did to install
it on my machine:
1. copy the netscape 4.7 tar.gz file to /tmp
2. unpack the file: cd /tmp; tar xvzf netscape 4.7 tar.gz
3. change to the newly created subdirectory of /tmp
4. run the installation script: ./ns-install (the only question you have to
answer is the target directory to which you want to install the files,
e.g. /opt/netscape, /usr/local/netscape or anything you like; see also
the file 'README.install' in the same directory)
5. to run netscape 4.7 the MOZILLA_HOME environment variable should be set
to the target directory from step 4. I've placed the following starting
script 'netscape' in /usr/local/bin (but you can also set the variable
in the init script of your shell, e.g. ~/.bashrc, place the netscape
directory in your path and start it with the command 'netscape'):
#!/bin/bash
# /usr/local/bin/netscape: wrapper for Netscape Navigator 4.7
MOZILLA_HOME="/opt/netscape"
if [ -x ${MOZILLA_HOME}/netscape ]; then
${MOZILLA_HOME}/netscape
fi
6. to add netscape to the Debian menu (e.g. under fvwm2 when you click
with the left mouse button on the root window/desktop) you
can place the following menu-entry file 'netscape-menu' in /etc/menu:
# /etc/menu/netscape-menu: menu entry for Netscape Navigator 4.7
?package(local.netscape):\
needs="x11"\
section="Apps/Net"\
title="netscape"\
longtitle="Netscape Navigator 4.7"\
command="/usr/local/bin/netscape"
^^^ (adjust for your start method)
and run 'update-menus'. After restarting the windowmanager there will
be a new menu entry 'netscape' under Apps/Net.
Bye
Andreas
On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 09:11:52AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ...
> I've downloaded the netscape 4.7 tar.gz file from netscape and
> installed (using dselect) netscape-base and netscape4 and their req's..
> but when I checked after the packages were installed (using find)
> there was nothing executable named netscape anywhere. (just some
> non-script in /etc/ I think) I thought maybe that I hadn't renamed the
> tar.gz file in whatever manner is being referred to above. I copied the
> tar.gz to someplace besides /tmp (so it wouldn't go *poof* when I
> logged back into the machine). Once I rename it however I need to
> what do I need to do to get netscape4 to install it. Alternatively, am I
> missing some _other_ crucial step?
> ...
Re: printer
According to http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/pht/show_printer.cgi?recnum=62912 the Epson Stylus Color 400 is supported perfectly by the ghostscript driver "stcolor" (which is used by magicfilter) and also by the gs uniprint driver stc500p.upp and stc500ph.upp. In the file /etc/magicfilter/stylus_color_360dpi-filter is a comment that you should change the options for gs version >=3.51 (Debian comes with version 5.10), so maybe you should try this first. If you want to use the uniprint drivers, copy stylus_color_360dpi-filter to 2 new files, e.g. stc500p-filter and stc500ph-filter, and edit the following lines - for stc500p-filter: # PostScript 0 %! filter /usr/bin/gs @stc500p.upp -q -sOutputFile=- - 0 \004%! filter /usr/bin/gs @stc500p.upp -q -sOutputFile=- - # PDF 0 %PDF fpipe/usr/bin/gs @stc500p.upp -q -sOutputFile=- $FILE (the changes in stc500ph-filter are equivalent to the above) After these changes you can setup 2 printer queues for /dev/lp0 with magicfilterconfig using the new filter-files: stc500p-filter for 360x360 dpi and stc500ph-filter for 720x720 dpi. Hope these hints can help you to use your Stylus Color 400 under Linux. Bye Andreas On Fri, Jan 14, 2000 at 05:44:31PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I am very new to Linux and have installed debian on my computer just a > few days ago. I am having trouble to get my printer working properly. > I have an Epson Stylus color 400 printer. I have installed the lpr > packing and used magicfilter to configure the printer. When I use the > lpr command to print my printer starts to print out a bunch of "y" for > only a couple of lines then it starts on a new sheet of paper and does > the same thing. This continues on till I have to turn off the printer > to get it to stop. My printcap file looks like this > lp|sc400|Epson SC 400:\ > :lp=/dev/lp0:sd=/var/spool/lpd/sc400:\ > :sh:pw#80:pl#72:px#1440:mx#0:\ > :if=/etc/magicfilter/stylus_color_360dpi-filter:\ > :af=/var/log/lp-acct:lf=/var/log/lp-errs: > i was wondering if anyone could help me out, thanks > Clyde >
Re: Where to find Printer Drivers
According to http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/pht/show_printer.cgi?recnum=96512 it is mostly supported by ghostscript with the bjc600 driver. Bye Andreas On Sat, Jan 15, 2000 at 12:09:59PM -0700, Cameron Matheson wrote: > Hey, > > I was wondering if anyone knew how I could get drivers for a Canon BJC-80 > printer for Debian 2.1 Slink. I went to Linux.com, but they only had about > two printer drivers, and none were Canon. > > Thanks, > > Cameron Matheson >
Re: Directory to copy?
It's /var/cache/apt for the package database and the downloaded deb's (in /var/cache/apt/archives) and /var/state/apt for the Packages-files from the latest apt-get update. Bye Andreas On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 10:58:50AM -0700, Robert L. Harris wrote: > > > Ok, > Somehow I lost the email that had the answer. I have finally doen > an "apt-get -d upgrade" pointed at potato. Someone had told me what > directory to tar up and copy to my other machines to upgrade them. > Can whomever re-tell me? > > Robert > > ...
Re: PPP and the kernel 2.4.1
On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 05:44:41PM +0100, Raffaele Sandrini wrote: > Hi, > > I got the new kernel to work. > > But i can't esrtablish a PPP conection. > I have the newest PPPD. What is the version of your PPP package. You need at least version 2.4.0f-1. I had the same problem with the PPP package from potato. But after upgrading to the PPP package from woody everything runs fine. Bye Andreas Schmidt
Re: configuring cups
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 02:02:03PM -0600, Phil Reardon wrote: > I understood cups had a script or gui for configuring cups, but I can't find > one. Was I wrong? How can I configjure cups for my HP deskjet 840C? > TIA, PCR > ... Hi Phil, the command-line tool for configuring the printers with cups is lpadmin, for example: lpadmin -p Deskjet -E -v parallel:/dev/lp0 -m deskjet.ppd -p: name of the printer, e.g. Deskjet -E: enable the printing queue for the printer -v: printer device, e.g. parallel:/dev/lp0 for first parallel port -m: use the default directory /usr/share/cups/model for the PPD description files deskjet.ppd: default ppd for HP deskjet printer It's also possible to configure the printer with a web-interface. Just start your favorite browser and go to http://localhost:631/admin/. Then use the button Add Printer to configure a new printer. Bye Andreas
Re: CUPS setup, but no /etc/printcap.cups file?
On Sun, Jul 22, 2001 at 10:02:08PM -0700, Randolph S. Kahle wrote: > > I set up CUPS for the first time and I do not see a file > > /etc/printcap.cups > > I understand that CUPS is supposed to generate entries each time I add a > printer. > > I have used the lpadmin command to add a printer (it works from lp), but > I cannot see the printing system from any applications. > > I tried putting in > > Printcap /etc/printcap.cups > > in the > > /etc/cups/cupsd.conf > > file, (restarted then added the printer) - but nothing shows up. > > Any tips? > > Thanks -- Randy > Which version of cups do you have installed? I'm running version 1.1.9 (compiled from source) and according to the comments in cupsd.conf the /etc/printcap should be generated automatically: # # Printcap: the name of the printcap file. Default is /etc/printcap. # Leave blank to disable printcap file generation. # #Printcap /etc/printcap This configuration works fine for me. After adding a new printer with lpadmin or with the web interface it immediately appears in /etc/printcap. Bye Andreas
Re: CUPS is asking for glibc - how do I get it?
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 02:18:14PM -0700, Randolph S. Kahle wrote: > I just installed CUPS 1.1.9 on a machine running 2.2r3 (2.2.18pre21 > kernel). It is working fine. > > Next, I installed it (with the 2.4.* deb file from http://www.cups.org) > on a machine running 2.2r3 with the 2.4 support packages and with the > 2.4 kernel. > > CUPS installs okay, but when I try to start it I get the message > > "/usr/sbin/cupsd: /lib/libc.so.6:version `GLIBC_2.2' not found (required > by /usr/sbin/cupsd) > > when I look at /lib I find that libc.so.6 -> libc-2.1.3.so > > What do I need to change? > > Thanks! -- Randy > Hi Randy, I've got the same problem when trying to install the 2.4.* deb-file for cups 1.1.9. They've linked the executables against the new version 2.2 of glibc. I like to run a stable system, that's the reason why I still stay with potato. So for me it was no choice to upgrade such a vital library like the glibc to a version from woody or sid. The only way to come around this problem is to get the source tarball from www.cups.org and compile it by yourself. It's as easy as going through the steps tar xvzf cups-1.1.9-1-source.tar.gz; cd cups-1.1.9; ./configure; make; su; make install. But have a look into the INSTALL.txt file in the source directory for additional information. For me it worked without problems. Bye Andreas
Re: where is alias 'name' for USB controller module?
On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 04:33:09PM -0500, mikepolniak wrote: > I want to auto-load the module for the USB contoller (usb-ohci) by its alias > in > /etc/modules.conf: > alias usb-ohci > > Where do i find the alias 'name' that kmod+modprobe use to look up this > feature? > ... According to the kernel documentation (file usb-help.txt) you can start with the following links for information about usb: (from linux/Documentation/usb/usb-help.txt) ### usb-help.txt 2000-July-12 For USB help other than the readme files that are located in linux/Documentation/usb/*, see the following: Linux-USB project: http://www.linux-usb.org mirrors athttp://www.suse.cz/development/linux-usb/ andhttp://usb.in.tum.de/linux-usb/ andhttp://it.linux-usb.org Linux USB Guide:http://linux-usb.sourceforge.net Linux-USB device overview (working devices and drivers): http://www.qbik.ch/usb/devices/ The Linux-USB mailing lists are: linux-usb-users@lists.sourceforge.net for general user help linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net for developer discussions ### I would recommend to use the Linux USB guide and FAQ at http://www.linux-usb.org as a starting point. Regards Andreas Schmidt
Re: v2.4.14 kernel compile problem
On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 08:53:51AM -0600, John Patton wrote: > On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 02:11:52PM +0800, Patrick Cheong Shu Yang wrote: > > Another one of those release many and release quick again > > > > Uuughh... > > > > I remember someone once said regarding the impending release of 2.4.0 > > and why it was taking so long...that Linus just has much higher > > standards...oh oh...this is definitely not in the correct direction in > > support of the previous comment... > > The thing is that they tried to accomplish ALOT in 2.4... everything > that they did is good and will lead to the linux kernel being a > genuinely excellent kernel that can rightly compete with commercial > unices, but all of the changes has introduced some new bugs that need > to be worked out. The thing is, do you want a super stable toy kernel > that works well for hobbyists and low-end desktop machines (one that is > simple but inefficient)? Or do you want a kernel that strives to be the > best... one that runs efficiently and well even under high load? The > 2.2 series is quite stable, but it cannot compete with most commercial > unices or even freeBSD on high end machines, while the 2.4 kernel has > gone a long way towards being able to do so. But high end power and > efficiency comes at the cost of much greater complexity, which is that > much harder to maintain flawlessly. Also keep in mind that 2.4 is being > actively worked on (despite it's declaration of being stable), and so > it cannot be counted on to run perfectly just yet. Give it some time... > Linus' standards are both high and ambitious, and when the smoke clears > the kernel should be really top notch. > Although I appreciate the enormous work that has been done during the development of the 2.4 kernel to bring it nearer to enterprise level (it has already reached this level in many aspects) I'm not sure if this is the right way to accomplish this goal. I had problems with kernel versions 2.4.9 to 2.4.12 (once there were errors while compiling NTFS support, another time there were problems with the parallel port, and finally a lot of VMM errors in version 2.4.10). Therefore I've just made the change from 2.4.8 to a running kernel 2.4.13. But now it seems this story will continue with 2.4.14. I never had these problems when changing to a new kernel version of the 2.2 series. So with all these problems in differnet 2.4 releases and keeping in mind that it's been actively worked on kernel 2.4 (as you wrote before) I wouldn't call it stable. Maybe it would be better to do this work on an unstable tree 2.5. But I think the Debian mailing list is not the right place for such discussions. Finally I agree with your conclusion: In the end the kernel will be top notch and everybody - including me - will be happy :-) Bye Andreas Schmidt
Re: international characters in mutt
On Sat, Oct 06, 2001 at 09:55:18PM +0200, Viktor Rosenfeld wrote: > Walter Hofmann wrote: > > > LANG=de_DE mutt > > > > and it works fine (but mutt speaks german now, which I don't really > > like). > > Try overwriting LC_MESSAGES, ie > > LANG=de_DE LC_MESSAGES=C mutt . > > mutt should speak English again, while showing German characters. > > ... Hi, I'm using the following setting in my .bashrc-file to have mutt "speaking" English but showing German characters: # German character set for mutt export LC_CTYPE=de_DE.ISO-8859-1 Bye Andreas Schmidt
Re: XFree 4.1 on Potato
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 03:02:45PM +1000, Penguin wrote: > I have Potato 2.2r0. Unfortunately the unofficial debs for xserver-common > 4.1, etc etc will not install. dpkg complains that xfree(86?)-common is only > at 3.x version, when I need the 4.1 version. Why is this? I thought all those > packages that installed xserver-common etc for XFree 4.1 was all I needed to > get XFree 4.1 running so I could use my NVIDIA GeForce II MX400 64M AGP card. > > So, can anyone tell me what other debs I need to get this happening? dpkg > apparently needs xfree-common or xfree86-common, whatever that is. > > ... I suppose the unofficials debs you mentioned are the debs by Charl P. Botha. The only problem I had while upgrading my potato box to Xfree86 4.1 was a dependency problem on xbase-clients (which depends on libfreetype6). But according to the READ.THIS file on http://people.debian.org/~cpbotha there may be some other dependency problems. Here are the steps to upgrade to XFree86 4.1 on a potato box that worked for me: 1.) install the version of libfreetype6 from http://people.debian.org/~cpbotha/xf4_potato_debs/libfreetype6_potato 2.) add the following lines to sources.list: deb http://people.debian.org/~cpbotha/ xf410_potato/i386/ deb http://people.debian.org/~cpbotha/ xf410_potato/all/ 3.) apt-get update 4.) if you have an already running XFree86 3.3.x apt-get dist-upgrade should do the job. 5.) if you are installing XFree86 for the first time select the needed packages with dselect (configured with access method apt) - it will take care about dependencies or install one of the metapackages x-window-system-core (only the essential packages) x-window-system (a more complete X-Window system) via dselect or by apt-get install x-window-system HTH Andreas Schmidt
Re: Debian2.2 and XFree86 version 4
On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 10:09:35PM +0200, Jan Krupa wrote: > > Does XFree86 version 4.x work well under debian2.2 (potato)? > Do you advise to install it instead version 3.x? > Does there exist debian package which installs XFree86 4.x > under debian2.2 ? > ... There are packages for XFree86 4.0.3 under potato. Just add the following lines to your sources.list: # Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 - XFree86 Version 4.0.3 deb http://people.debian.org/~cpbotha/ xf403_potato/all/ deb http://people.debian.org/~cpbotha/ xf403_potato/i386/ Just run apt-get update / apt-get dist-upgrade to upgrade your installation of version 3.x. You can also use dselect with apt as access method to install it, if you didn't have an existing XFree86 installation. You have to configure XFree86 Version 4.0.3 with xf86config (in text mode) because there is no graphical setup program like in version 3.x. For me there were no problems with the upgrade (I used apt-get to upgrade an existing installation). But I think at the moment not every graphic card that is supported in version 3.x is already supported in version 4.0.3. So better check if your card is supported on http://www.xfree86.org before making the upgrade. Bye Andreas
Re: Debian2.2 and XFree86 version 4
On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 04:18:11PM +0300, Derya PALANCI wrote: > Hi Andreas > > I had the same problem so i did what you told someone else... but it removes > some packages now i cannot make "xf86config" it says command not found... do > i have to do something? > > I have a i810 board, debian potato 2.2 , newly installed xfree86 4.0.3 > ... Hi Derya, xf86config is in the package xbase-clients. So after an apt-get install xbase-clients xf86config should be back again. Bye Andreas
