Re: Network bridge and MAC address exposure

2022-09-05 Thread Rand Pritelrohm
On Sun, 4 Sep 2022 08:39:59 +0200
Rand Pritelrohm  wrote:

>Hello,
>
>I am not a network specialist and despite a lot of documentation
>readings and searchs on the net I haven't get a simple and clear answer
>to my question.
>
[...]
>
>
>Here is my question:
>For both scenarios, what is the effectively seen MAC address by the
>GW when the VM access the Internet (host or VM MAC address)?


Hello,

Thank you all for contribution.
I will investigate further with wireshark.

Regards,

--
Rand Pritelrohm



Re: uvcdynctrl on bullseye?

2022-09-05 Thread debian-user
> On Fri, 2 Sep 2022 12:09:31 -0400
> Dan Ritter  wrote:
> 
> > Dave Howorth wrote:   
> > > 
> > > I'd like to use uvcdynctrl on a bullseye 64-bit system. But
> > > according to
> > > https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=uvcdynctrl the
> > > package is not available for any flavour of bullseye. It is
> > > available for both earlier (stretch and buster) and later
> > > (bookworm and sid) releases.
> > > 
> > > So I'm curious what the reason is? And if I could use one of the
> > > other versions on my system? I'm sadly no expert on forwards and
> > > backwards compatibility issues.
> > 
> > Will v4l2-ctl work for what you want to adjust?  
> 
> I don't know, I'm not familiar with it. I need to import the
> logitech.xml file and then set an attribute that was loaded 'Led1
> Mode'.

Just a quick note to say that v4l2-ctl does seem to do the job. It
knows about the attribute and apparently can control it. I'm not sure
yet whether it knows about the attribute automatically somehow or
whether something I did when fiddling about somehow 'taught' it, but
I'll experiment some more.

So thanks very much for the tip :)

> > I suspect that the reason for it not being in bullseye is simply
> > that it didn't have a maintainer paying attention to it for a
> > few years, and then it has been built since bullseye was
> > released.
> > 
> > -dsr-



Re: booting 5.10 686-pae kernel on domU

2022-09-05 Thread Andy Smith
Hello,

On Sun, Sep 04, 2022 at 01:54:16PM +0100, Tim Woodall wrote:
> and remove pvshim=1

I think this was your issue. pvshim is PV-inside-PVH. So the
hypervisor that starts your guest kernel is in PV mode, which as
mentioned is not supported for 32-bit in newer Linux kernels.

Modern Linux kernels should either be run in PVH or HVM mode under
Xen. pvshim is strictly for older guests.

Cheers,
Andy

-- 
https://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting



MSPs/MSSPs and CSPs Install Base

2022-09-05 Thread Hazel Johnson
Hi there,



Would you like to target accounts and users of the below service providers in 
order to boost your sales and marketing goals in this quarter?



We have hands in providing contact information of: -



Target Technology

Geo- NA, EMEA, APAC and LATAM

MSPs

74,279 Companies

MSSPs

37,054 Companies



We can also provide your competitors, technology and industries end users 
install base.



Let me know if you are interested in receiving detailed information on the 
above.



Best Regards,

Hazel

Demand Generation Manager



If you wish to not to receive further emails, change the subject line to 
Unsubscribe.



Re: booting 5.10 686-pae kernel on domU

2022-09-05 Thread Tim Woodall

On Mon, 5 Sep 2022, Andy Smith wrote:


Hello,

On Sun, Sep 04, 2022 at 01:54:16PM +0100, Tim Woodall wrote:

and remove pvshim=1


I think this was your issue. pvshim is PV-inside-PVH. So the
hypervisor that starts your guest kernel is in PV mode, which as
mentioned is not supported for 32-bit in newer Linux kernels.

Modern Linux kernels should either be run in PVH or HVM mode under
Xen. pvshim is strictly for older guests.



Yes, thanks. I understand now. I was actually running the 64 bit kernels
this way too - a bit of googling and I worked out that I should be using
the grub-i386-xen_pvh.bin kernel for 64 bit too.

The old pv grub kernel had to be different for i386 and amd64 but the
pvh grub kernel can be used for both - which simplifies things.

Thanks for your help - I was completely stuck and duckduckgo wasn't
giving me any clues but as soon as you said pv had been removed my
'enhanced' searching and experimenting put me on the right track.

Tim.



Re: Substitute for archivemail

2022-09-05 Thread Joey Hess
chewmail is probably the best substitute. It has a very similar usage,
I only had to change the -o option and replace -u with -R.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature