Re: MicroSuck makes me fume!

1996-12-04 Thread llucius
On Mon, 2 Dec 1996, Daniel Stringfield wrote:

> In response to someone's suggestion to get the Microfoft WOrd Viewer, and
> run it under WINE.  Well. It sorta runs under wine.  It requires that
> SHARE.EXE be loaded.  Uhg!  How do I get it to think I am running it?
> 
I'm not sure how WINE works, but in regular windows there is an 
alternative:  vshare.386.

Leland

__ Y_ a_ m_ b_ o_ | The leanest, meanest, fightinest sweet tater on Earth!
   oo o  oo o  o  | 
o   o   o | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 o ooo o  | 
-- -- -- -- -- -- | http://www.millcomm.com/~llucius   (maybe one day)


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


No disk drives ?

1996-12-04 Thread Jean-Gakl GRICOURT
I'didn't succeed to install the DEBIAN LINUX 1.1, the disks are not
recognized,the error message is : "No hard disk drives could be found !"
when trying to partition the main HD.

My hardware configuration is :

   - Ultrastore SCSI-2 34F VLB with :  

- 540 MB SCSI disk
- 1 Go SCSI disk
 IRQ=14
 I/O=330h
 BIOS=c8000-cbfff

   - Adaptec SCSI-2 1510 (built in the soundblaster card) with a SCSI
 CD-ROM (Sony).

 IRQ=11
 I/O=340h
 no BIOS avalaible

   - Soundblaster 16 ASP

 IRQ=7
 I/O=220h
 I/O MIDI=300h
 DMA 8=1
 DMA 16=5

   - Viper VLB P9000 video card

 IRQ=9
 I/O=3b0h
 BIOS=c-c7fff

   - Modem Novafax 28800 (UART 16550 AF)

 IRQ=3
 I/O=2e8h
 COM=4

   - Tape QIC-80 connected with floppy disk

Other informations :

I've 20 MB of RAM and a 486 DX2 66 actually running WIN 95.
I would be glad to change for LINUX .


mailto://[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Fortunes (I have none)

1996-12-04 Thread Stan Brown

I graved the fortune program out of stable. It runs, but produces
no fortunes. Is there anothe packahe I need to grab with the
fortunes? 

Could there be some other ste up I need to do?


-- 
Stan Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]404-996-6955
Factory Automation Systems
Atlanta Ga.
-- 
Look, look, see Windows 95.  Buy, lemmings, buy!   
Pay no attention to that cliff ahead...Henry Spencer
(c) 1996 Stan Brown.  Redistribution via the Microsoft Network is prohibited.


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Where to get source for netdate

1996-12-04 Thread Stan Brown
 Subject line pretty much says it all.

 BTW is this a Debian extension? My redHat box doesn;t seem to
 have it nor my FreeBSD box.



-- 
Stan Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]404-996-6955
Factory Automation Systems
Atlanta Ga.
-- 
Look, look, see Windows 95.  Buy, lemmings, buy!   
Pay no attention to that cliff ahead...Henry Spencer
(c) 1996 Stan Brown.  Redistribution via the Microsoft Network is prohibited.


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Installing libdl1 (ldso)

1996-12-04 Thread Mark Phillips

Hi,

I wrote recently about problems with running dselect, namely that the
installation step fails with:

dpkg: cannot see how to satisfy pre-dependency:
 perl pre-depends on libdl1
dpkg: cannot satisfy pre-dependencies for perl (wanted due to perl)

I had a look and found that the new version of ldso provides libdl1
(whereas the old version of ldso doesn't).  So I don't know why
dselect doesn't work this out itself, but anyway, in the meantime, I
guess the solution would be to run:

dpkg --install rex/binary-i386/base/ldso_1.8.5-1.deb
dpkg --configure ldso


But because I am not familiar with using dpkg, and because I think
ldso is probably a package I cannot afford to make a mistake with, I
am hesitant to go ahead.  Is this the right thing to do?  Do I need to
do a dpkg --purge to remove the earlier version of ldso first?


Thanks for your help,

Mark Phillips.  ([EMAIL PROTECTED])


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: MicroSuck makes me fume!

1996-12-04 Thread Dale Scheetz
On Mon, 2 Dec 1996, Daniel Stringfield wrote:

> In response to someone's suggestion to get the Microfoft WOrd Viewer, and
> run it under WINE.  Well. It sorta runs under wine.  It requires that
> SHARE.EXE be loaded.  Uhg!  How do I get it to think I am running it?
> 
Is there some reason you just can't run it in WINE?
I have not had the time to try out WINE, although I have an interest.
Please report any interesting findings?

Luck,

Dwarf

  --

aka   Dale Scheetz   Phone:   1 (904) 877-0257
  Flexible Software  Fax: NONE 
  Black Creek Critters   e-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 If you don't see what you want, just ask --


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: date and time

1996-12-04 Thread Paul Christenson
On Wed, 27 Nov 1996, Graeme Stewart wrote:

> > "michael" == Fundamental  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> michael> my debian time is wrong:) The time in my cmos is correct,
> michael> but the time that debian displays is incorrect
> 
> After doing a `date -s "Now"' to get the system time right, use `clock -w' 
> or `clock -wu' to set the CMOS clock.

This is likely what caused the problem.

On my machine, 'clock -w' completely scrambles the time on my CMOS clock.
I had to reset it before the machine could boot without hollering.

   |   This is OFFICIAL WRITTEN notification that I want to be REMOVED   |
   |   from ALL commercial mailing lists.  EVERY message sent from this  |
   | account has had this request posted. ALL UNSOLICITED ADVERTISEMENTS |
   | SENT TO THIS ACCOUNT ARE IN VIOLATION OF FEDERAL (U.S.) LAW.|


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: modules 2.0.0-14

1996-12-04 Thread Tom Lees
On Sun, 1 Dec 1996, Bruce Perens wrote:

> I think modules-2.0.0-14.deb has been withdrawn. -13 is in "frozen" now.
> We have modules 2.1.8-1.deb in "unstable", but that may depend on the
> currently-shaky 2.1.x kernel.

We should upgrade to modules-2.1.13 - works with all 2.0 kernels, and most
2.1 (<2.1.7, >2.1.7 probably, >=2.1.13 definitely) - this will stop new
users of the stable Debian 1.2 who still want to use 2.1 kernels from
finding "bugs" in modules.

-- 
Tom Lees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>PGP public key ID 87D4D065
PGP fingerprint: 2A 66 86 9D 02 4D A6 1E  B8 A2 17 9D 4F 9B 89 D6
== Linux debian 2.1.13 #6 Sat Nov 30 14:08:02 GMT 1996 i486 ==


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


/etc/password locked.

1996-12-04 Thread J. Ramos Goncalves

Hi,

When I try to use vipw to change the /etc/passwd file, I receive
a message that this file is locked. I thing this happened due to
a crash when I was editing it with vipw. I would be grateful if
someone could give me some advice of how to unlock the passwd
file.

Thanks!

Ramos.

--
 J. RAMOS Goncalves | E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   
 Department of Physics - University of Reading - England - U.K.


--
This message was delayed because the list mail delivery agent was down.


Bad packages in stable !?!?

1996-12-04 Thread Per-Eric Danielsson
Hello,

What's going on with "buzz" ?

Packages modules-2.0.0-15 and ppp-2.2.0f-18 have Pre-Depends: libc5 (>=
5.4.7-7)
in Debian-1.1.16 but that version of libc is not released with buzz...

Will this be fixed ?

/Per-Eric


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]