Bug#760050: transition: llvm-toolchain-3.5

[Sylvestre Ledru]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Hello,

To make sure Jessie gets ship with a recent version of llvm, I would
like to transit llvm from version 3.4 to 3.5.
I am also planning to update llvm-defaults to make sure that llvm, clang
and lldb tools are proposing version 3.5.

However, I am planning to keep llvm 3.4 in the archive.
So, packages not supporting 3.5 won't be deleted. We will just have to force.
the version 3.4.

Cheers,
Sylvestre

Ben file:

title = "llvm-toolchain-3.5";
is_affected = .depends ~ "lib(clang1-3.4|libllvm3.4)" | .depends ~ 
"lib(clang1-3.5|libllvm3.5)";
is_good = .depends ~ "lib(clang1-3.5|libllvm3.5)";
is_bad = .depends ~ "lib(clang1-3.4|libllvm3.4)";


-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable-updates'), 
(500, 'stable'), (300, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.14-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/20140831102805.7169.72061.report...@leyte.mozilla.com

Bug#748535: transition: gnutls28

[Andreas Metzler]

On 2014-08-03 Andreas Metzler  wrote:
[...]
> nmu libccrtp_2.0.9-2 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'

almost the final ones:

nmu gtklp_1.2.7-2.3 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'
nmu samhain_3.1.0-6 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'
nmu suricata_2.0.3-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'
nmu x11vnc_0.9.13-1.1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'

tia, cu Andreas

-- 
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140831142604.gd31...@downhill.g.la

Bug#748535: transition: gnutls28

[Andreas Metzler]

On 2014-08-31 Andreas Metzler  wrote:
[...]
> nmu gtklp_1.2.7-2.3 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'

Nevermind about this one, it is only in sid and has an open FTBFS bug.

cu Andreas

-- 
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140831142927.ge31...@downhill.g.la

Bug#748535: transition: gnutls28

[Emilio Pozuelo Monfort]

On 31/08/14 16:26, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2014-08-03 Andreas Metzler  wrote:
> [...]
>> nmu libccrtp_2.0.9-2 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'
> 
> almost the final ones:
> 
> nmu gtklp_1.2.7-2.3 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'

Not done as you said.

> nmu samhain_3.1.0-6 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'
> nmu suricata_2.0.3-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'
> nmu x11vnc_0.9.13-1.1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'

Done.

Emilio


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54033659.7060...@debian.org

Bug#760101: wheezy-pu: package kvpm/0.8.6-2+deb7u1

[Benjamin J. Scott]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: wheezy
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

Note: this is my second reportbug attempt for this
bug. My first had the debdiff arguments reversed. 

Bug #753175 for package kvpm causes a FTBFS in the
stable version of kvpm. The problem is a typo in a
debian/patches/ patch file. I have built an update
with a Wheezy chroot. The following is a "debdiff"
of the change:

diff -Nru kvpm-0.8.6/debian/changelog kvpm-0.8.6/debian/changelog
--- kvpm-0.8.6/debian/changelog 2013-03-28 04:03:17.0 -0700
+++ kvpm-0.8.6/debian/changelog 2014-08-26 19:35:29.0 -0700
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+kvpm (0.8.6-2+deb7u2) wheezy; urgency=low
+
+  [ Benjamin J. Scott ]
+  * Changed file debian/patches/bug-667232.patch. Fixed typo in patch file
+that caused FTBFS in last archive rebuild (Closes: #753175).
+
+ -- Benjamin J. Scott   Tue, 26 Aug 2014 17:25:21 -0700
+
 kvpm (0.8.6-2+deb7u1) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=high
 
   [ Benjamin J. Scott ]
diff -Nru kvpm-0.8.6/debian/patches/bug-667232.patch 
kvpm-0.8.6/debian/patches/bug-667232.patch
--- kvpm-0.8.6/debian/patches/bug-667232.patch  2012-09-16 20:41:30.0 
-0700
+++ kvpm-0.8.6/debian/patches/bug-667232.patch  2014-08-26 16:42:34.0 
-0700
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 Fixed FTBFS with gcc version 4.7 by including the system header
 unistd.h in main.cpp and misc.cpp. It was implicitly included
-with gcc 4.6 and earlier.--- a/kvpm/main.cpp
+with gcc 4.6 and earlier.
+--- a/kvpm/main.cpp
 +++ b/kvpm/main.cpp
 @@ -12,6 +12,8 @@
   * See the file "COPYING" for the exact licensing terms.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.14-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/20140831184725.3461.91810.reportbug@bedroom.boskone

Bug#760101: wheezy-pu: package kvpm/0.8.6-2+deb7u1

[Adam D. Barratt]

Control: forcemerge 759414 -1
Control: tags -1 + confirmed

On 2014-08-31 19:47, Benjamin J. Scott wrote:

Note: this is my second reportbug attempt for this
bug. My first had the debdiff arguments reversed.


We can re-use the same bug report. :-)

Please go ahead; thanks.

Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/6f6807c681df2a18931366f448383...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org

Processed: Re: Bug#760101: wheezy-pu: package kvpm/0.8.6-2+deb7u1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> forcemerge 759414 -1
Bug #759414 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package kvpm/0.8.6-2+deb7u1
Bug #760101 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package kvpm/0.8.6-2+deb7u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
Merged 759414 760101
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #760101 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package kvpm/0.8.6-2+deb7u1
Bug #759414 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package kvpm/0.8.6-2+deb7u1
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #760101 to the same tags previously set
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #759414 to the same tags previously set

-- 
759414: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=759414
760101: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=760101
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b760101.140951232132515.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#759414: release.debian.org: debdiff with arguments in correct order

[Benjamin J. Scott]

Package: release.debian.org
Tags: wheezy
Followup-For: Bug #759414
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu


This is the debdiff reversed:


diff -Nru kvpm-0.8.6/debian/changelog kvpm-0.8.6/debian/changelog
--- kvpm-0.8.6/debian/changelog 2013-03-28 04:03:17.0 -0700
+++ kvpm-0.8.6/debian/changelog 2014-08-26 19:35:29.0 -0700
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+kvpm (0.8.6-2+deb7u2) wheezy; urgency=low
+
+  [ Benjamin J. Scott ]
+  * Changed file debian/patches/bug-667232.patch. Fixed typo in patch file
+that caused FTBFS in last archive rebuild (Closes: #753175).
+
+ -- Benjamin J. Scott   Tue, 26 Aug 2014 17:25:21 -0700
+
 kvpm (0.8.6-2+deb7u1) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=high
 
   [ Benjamin J. Scott ]
diff -Nru kvpm-0.8.6/debian/patches/bug-667232.patch 
kvpm-0.8.6/debian/patches/bug-667232.patch
--- kvpm-0.8.6/debian/patches/bug-667232.patch  2012-09-16 20:41:30.0 
-0700
+++ kvpm-0.8.6/debian/patches/bug-667232.patch  2014-08-26 16:42:34.0 
-0700
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 Fixed FTBFS with gcc version 4.7 by including the system header
 unistd.h in main.cpp and misc.cpp. It was implicitly included
-with gcc 4.6 and earlier.--- a/kvpm/main.cpp
+with gcc 4.6 and earlier.
+--- a/kvpm/main.cpp
 +++ b/kvpm/main.cpp
 @@ -12,6 +12,8 @@
   * See the file "COPYING" for the exact licensing terms.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.14-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/20140831205127.31457.48361.reportbug@bedroom.boskone

Bug#760114: transition: kfreebsd-kernel-headers

[Steven Chamberlain]

Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Hi,  This is not a mere transition but our ambition to use kFreeBSD 10.1
as our kernel version for jessie.

This is primarily driven by the FreeBSD 10.1 release schedule;  they
have gone into a 'code slush' which resembles Debian's early freeze,
with a final freeze date of 5th September, then they begin beta
builds.  That applies to their entire distribution, not just their
kernel.
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/10.1R/schedule.html

A major consequence of their release schedule is that 10.0 security
support will have ended by the time Jessie is released.  10.1 should get
long-term security support, which means two years from release.
http://www.freebsd.org/security/security.html#sup

Within Debian:

* packaging of 10.1 snapshots began some 3 weeks ago, it is in
experimental and got through the NEW queue already

* Christoph has been running it throughout DebConf

* it's working fine with d-i:  I've been using 10.1 kernels exclusively
while working on the bugs reported in d-i beta 1 (even udebs based on
10.0 or older userland)

* the snapshots are based on 10-STABLE, so it is not a development
trunk;  it is viable to use a snapshot of this for Debian even if the
final 10.1 release comes too late to reach sid/jessie

* we're already using some features that were new/unimplemented in 10.0,
such as newcons that Robert backported an early version of, and KMS
which should have matured some more in 10.1

* clang-3.3 is being dropped from jessie/sid in favour of clang-3.4 or
3.5:  upstream already builds 10.1 with clang-3.4, whereas 10.0 would
need some bits backported by us (not too difficult though)

The actual 'transition' part will be kfreebsd-kernel-headers from 10.0
to 10.1 (a snapshot is in experimental;  we could update it to a newer
snapshot in a few days).  It already went through a 9.2->10.0 transition
earlier this year.  Reverse-Depends are mostly our own freebsd-libs,
libc0.1-dev, and from there it could affect many more things.

Still it doesn't seem like a regular transition, I don't know if a Ben
file could be written to describe it.  It should not make anything
uninstallable by migrating to jessie.

amd64/i386 hardware is easy to get a hold of, so we could do some
test rebuilds where it seems like a good idea.

Thanks!

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: kfreebsd-amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: kFreeBSD 9.0-2-amd64-xenhvm-ipsec
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/20140831215501.76522.79850.report...@sid.kfreebsd-amd64.pyro.eu.org

Bug#760123: release.debian.org: perl 5.20.1 'transition'

[Dominic Hargreaves]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal

Hi,

We are preparing packages for 5.20.1 (soon to be released upstream, and
with fixes we'd like to include in jessie) in experimental, and would
like to check whether you're okay with an upload to unstable within the
next couple of weeks (hopefully).

There is no ABI incompatiblity, but a small number of packages need
a binNMU anyway (see [1]) and even smaller number need coordinated
sourceful uploads.

Thanks,
Dominic.

[1] 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/20140901001020.7752.641.report...@urchin.earth.li

Re: [debian-mysql] MySQL in Jessie

[Matthias Klose]

Am 27.08.2014 um 12:55 schrieb Bjoern Boschman:
> to sum things up:
> 
> * mariadb-5.5 within testing
> * mariadb-10.0 within experimental
> * mysql-5.5 within testing
> * mysql-5.6 within experimental
> * percona-xtradb-cluster-server-5.5 within sid

> As the transition timeframe is quite close we need a decision!
> This decision should be done by the release team agreed together with
> your collegues at ubuntu/canonical as we should definately *not* fork
> this decision!

mysql-5.5's autopkg tests fail (this is a regression), and I didn't see any
action to fix these. Now ignored at least in Ubuntu.

mysql-5.6's autopkg tests always failed, didn't see any action to fix these.

mariadb-5.5, mariadb-10.0, and percona-xtradb-cluster-server-5.5 don't have
autopkg tests enabled at all.

test results for mysql-5.x are ignored during the build for most architectures
(there are some). didn't check for the other packages.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5403c5ec.7040...@debian.org

Bug#760124: nmu: libwx-perl_1:0.9923-3, libpar-packer-perl_1.019-1, libverilog-perl_3.404-1

[Niko Tyni]

Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-perl-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org, 
p...@packages.debian.org

At least three packages were built partly without hardened LDFLAGS in
the Perl 5.20 transition because of #758471. This should be fixed in
5.20.0-6, so could you please binNMU the known ones?

nmu libwx-perl_1:0.9923-3  . ALL . -m "rebuild with hardened LDFLAGS (see 
#758471)"
nmu libpar-packer-perl_1.019-1 . ALL . -m "rebuild with hardened LDFLAGS (see 
#758471)"
nmu libverilog-perl_3.404-1. ALL . -m "rebuild with hardened LDFLAGS (see 
#758471)"

(I haven't listed the "dw" lines: I understand a dep-wait doesn't
 guarantee the newer perl is installed on the buildds, and something
 called "extra-depends" is needed instead, but I don't quite know the
 syntax. Perhaps you could enlighten me?)
-- 
Niko Tyni   nt...@debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140901014009.GA8382@estella.local.invalid

Bug#760128: nmu: guacamole-server_0.8.3-1

[Vincent Cheng]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu guacamole-server_0.8.3-1 . ALL . -m "rebuild due to freerdp soname change"

This would fix #758478. libfreerdp1's soname change is tracked as #757605.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (700, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (200, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.15-2-vclaptop-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/20140901033512.4535.69813.reportbug@vincent-tlaptop

Re: libquazip transition (freemedforms-project package update)

[Andreas Tille]

Hi Emilio,

On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 07:57:53PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> 
> What I need right now is an upload of freemedforms-project that build depends 
> on
> libquazip-dev, instead of the (no longer existent) libquazip0-dev.

I think the most simple solution would be to remove freemedforms-project
from testing right now.  It will be replaced by 0.9.2 migrating from
unstable anyway.  To me this seems for all the least work for basically
the same result.

Thanks for your work in the release team

 Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140901063043.ga9...@an3as.eu