Re: lusca - should it be in Debian?
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 05:36:23AM +0100, Luigi Gangitano wrote: >Il giorno 01/dic/2011, alle ore 19:18, Steve McIntyre ha scritto: >> Hi Luigi, >> >> I'm working through the list of build failures for armhf while we >> bring up the new architecture, and I've just got to lusca. I'm >> concerned about the status of this package: >> >> * it's an svn snapshot of a fork of squid >> * it's been uploaded once into Debian >> * there are 2 serious bugs open against it for over 2 months without >> any response from you as the maintainer >> * a very low popcon score suggests it has a very small number of >> users >> >> Please re-consider if this package should be in the archive or not. > >Hi Steve, > >Lusca is a promising fork of Squid 2.x from Adrian Chadd once he left >the Squid development team. I support his idea of modularization of >squid 2.x and added the package to Debian hoping to get some momentum >around it. > >Development seems to lag upstream, however, and will surely consider >if it should be released in Wheezy, once the freeze approaches. OK, that's fair enough I guess. But are you going to do any work on the package in the meantime, like fixing the RC bugs? If not, it should be pulled from the archive now rather than leaving it until the freeze. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com "This dress doesn't reverse." -- Alden Spiess -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111202114143.ga...@einval.com
Re: Updating stable Cherokee 1.0.8-5 to avoid a predictable password generation
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 07:58:19 -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote: Adam D. Barratt dijo [Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 06:26:47AM +]: On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 18:47 -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > Ok - Uploaded to the regular queue. [...] Heh... Noticed that my upload was rejected (I got an explicit mail). Well, I uploaded it to /3 two days ago, and it's not urgency:high or anything like that, so I'll just let it fall to its place as scheduled. It duly did that, and got accepted a few days ago; I appear to have forgotten to follow-up for the record at the time though. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/86c028d491e5d571f365771f1aa93...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
Re: Bugs in stable c-ares package
On 11/22/11 10:24 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sun, 2011-11-06 at 16:17 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> On Sat, 2011-11-05 at 20:51 +0100, Gregor Jasny wrote: >>> >>> Uploaded to mentors for reviewing and testing: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/c-ares/c-ares_1.7.3-1squeeze1.dsc >>> >>> Andreas, could you please upload to stable (if you have no objections) >>> once the release team gives their OK? >> >> The debdiff as provided in your mail looks fine; thanks. For the record, the upload happened and was accepted a few days ago; I appear to have neglected to follow-up at the time. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51ba1806f9e8850e563f6b0e5e526...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
Re: stable-proposed-updates: considering cpufrequtils
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 03:12:04PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 13:20 +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote: ... > > cpufrequtils (007-2+squeeze1) stable; urgency=low > > The version for stable needs to be lower than the version in testing - > convention would be -1+squeeze1 (or -2~squeeze1 at a push). > > With that change, please go ahead; thanks. Done finally. Thanks -- mattia :wq! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111203064139.ga16...@kamineko.org
