hint for lxc required

2011-10-13 Thread Daniel Baumann
Hi,

please add a hint for lxc 0.7.5-3.

Regards,
Daniel

-- 
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email:  daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net
Internet:   http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e96b68f.3070...@progress-technologies.net



Re: hint for lxc required

2011-10-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt

On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 11:59:43 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:

please add a hint for lxc 0.7.5-3.


It doesn't need a hint, it needs the FTBFS fixing - see 
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=lxc


Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/4a539856d42f2956cd034bebb3d5d...@adsl.funky-badger.org



Re: hint for lxc required

2011-10-13 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:59:43 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> please add a hint for lxc 0.7.5-3.
> 
No, it doesn't need a hint, it needs to not be out of date on some
architectures.

Cheers,
Julien


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111013100406.ga8...@coloquinte.cristau.org



Re: hint for lxc required

2011-10-13 Thread Daniel Baumann
On 10/13/2011 12:09 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> It doesn't need a hint, it needs the FTBFS fixing - see
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=lxc

i already requested the removal of those archs some time ago, see #640351.

-- 
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email:  daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net
Internet:   http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e96bbc4.1010...@progress-technologies.net



Re: hint for lxc required

2011-10-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt

On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:21:56 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:

On 10/13/2011 12:09 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:

It doesn't need a hint, it needs the FTBFS fixing - see
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=lxc


i already requested the removal of those archs some time ago, see 
#640351.


Indeed, although the list of architectures in the subject and those 
mentioned in the body are different so it would appear that only those 
listed in the subject were actioned. You'll need to submit a new request 
to ftp-master for the others.


Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/689d1e23d8044d788d6a1e529e7b8...@adsl.funky-badger.org



Processed: block 635515 with 644592 644649

2011-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> block 635515 with 644592 644649
Bug #635515 [release.debian.org] transition: hunspell
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 635515: 644592 and 644649
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
635515: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=635515
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131852449430111.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: tagging 635515

2011-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 635515 + pending
Bug #635515 [release.debian.org] transition: hunspell
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
635515: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=635515
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131852770513546.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: tagging 637331

2011-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 637331 + pending
Bug #637331 [release.debian.org] transition: nautilus
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
637331: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=637331
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131852816515290.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Re: ifupdown-extra upload to stable-proposed-updates

2011-10-13 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 03:16:52PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Unfortunately, after some more detailed review of the diff and some
> testing, I'm afraid we've had to reject the upload, as it stands.
> 
> The issue is the move of the conffile simply using "mv".  This leads to
> dpkg raising a conffile change prompt on upgrades even if the user has
> not made any changes.  Note that this issue also affects the package in
> unstable, so would need resolving there first.

After fixing the issue and testing upgrades from the 0.14 squeeze (both to
0.22 and 0.14.2) I have uploaded a fix to both unstable and stable for this
issue.  Hopefully it will be OK now.

Regards

Javier


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#637331: transition: nautilus

2011-10-13 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 12.10.2011 20:38, schrieb Julien Cristau:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 15:11:57 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> 
>> as next step of getting GNOME 3 into unstable, we'd like to request a
>> slot to start the nautilus 3 transition
> 
> Should be ok to go ahead with this now, I think.  Let the fun begin.

As requested on irc:

please schedule a binNMU for nautilus-share
with a dep-wait on libnautilus-extension-dev (>= 3.0.0)


Thanks,
Michael
-- 
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature