Re: Update for dokuwiki/lenny
Hi, On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 11:56:14AM +0200, Tanguy Ortolo wrote: > My last update of dokuwiki/lenny, which fixed a security flaw and was > released with Lenny 5.0.9, unfortunately introduced a quite important > regression, breaking any wiki page containing external links. I should > have detected it, but it appears that I did not test external links (and > I really should have done so, since the security fix was about external > links). as the security team is pushing more and more fixes towards (o-)p-u, and as this was originally a security fix, I'd like to ask the Security Team for a curtesy: as we do not have -updates for lenny, can you please issue a DSA with the regression fix? > It is described in the bug report #644145, which Julien Cristau has > already identified as affecting this point release. I have corrected > this regression in a new version [1] which has been tested by myself and > at least two users. This version modifies the previous one's security > patch by replacing calls to an undefined function that was introduced in > a later version. > > [1] > http://tanguy.ortolo.eu/deb/dokuwiki/dokuwiki_0.0.20080505-4+lenny4.dsc > > For those affected, the bug report already gives a pointer to this > updated version. Do you think it can be added to a possible next point > release? Thanks Philipp Kern signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Update for dokuwiki/lenny
On Thu, October 6, 2011 14:23, Philipp Kern wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 11:56:14AM +0200, Tanguy Ortolo wrote: >> My last update of dokuwiki/lenny, which fixed a security flaw and was >> released with Lenny 5.0.9, unfortunately introduced a quite important >> regression, breaking any wiki page containing external links. I should >> have detected it, but it appears that I did not test external links (and >> I really should have done so, since the security fix was about external >> links). > > as the security team is pushing more and more fixes towards (o-)p-u, > and as this was originally a security fix, I'd like to ask the > Security Team for a curtesy: as we do not have -updates for lenny, > can you please issue a DSA with the regression fix? OK. Tanguy, if you update your target distribution to oldstable-security and upload to security-master, we can release it. Thijs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/9eb4e668bb15cacb5c0d9a124357a7dc.squir...@wm.kinkhorst.nl
libmatroska: SONAME bump
[I'm not subscribed; please, Cc me in case of reply] Hi all! With new upstream release of libmatroska (we are now at 1.3.0), there has been a new bump for SONAME made by upstream. They moved from libmatroska4 to libmatroska5. So the source package 'libmatroska' would provide the library "libmatroska5" and the development library "libmatroska-dev". About the last one, two packages in the archives have b-deps against this devel lib: * mkvtoolnix, which requires libmatroska-dev (>= 1.1.0) * vlc, which requires libmatroska-dev (>= 0.8.0) So there seems to be no problem with the dependencies. Or am I wrong? I'm here to ask you which are the steps I'm supposed to follow to prevent any problem in the transition with this new upload. At first glance, there should be none but "asking before messing2 is always the right choice ;-) Thanks a lot for your kind replies. mfv -- Ing. Matteo F. Vescovi -- Il messaggio e' stato analizzato alla ricerca di virus o contenuti pericolosi da MailScanner, ed e' risultato non infetto. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e8da658.7030...@revese.it
Bug#635515: Bug#644506: hunspell: crash with some morphological fields combination
Version: 1.3.2-1 Hi, On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 03:22:24PM +0200, Davide Prina wrote: > Package: hunspell > Version: 1.2.14-4 > Severity: important > Tags: fixed-in-experimental [...] > hunspell crash on some wrong words if some morphological fields > combinations are present in the affix file. Note that you have crash > only on some wrong words. > > Note that this crash can be reproducible in (i think all) > applications that use hunspell spellchecker (i.e. LibreOffice, that > I have tested: you have a crash if you right click at some red > underscored words). so it's a bug in libhunspell, not hunspell ;-) > This bug seem to be fixed with hunspell 1.3.2, please let it go to > sid and testing and let all application depend on it. I would have done already months ago, see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=635515, maybe you want to convince them to allow the transition it now that python-defaults is in? Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111006134614.ga20...@rene-engelhard.de
libmatroska: SONAME bump
[I'm not subscribed; please, Cc me in case of reply] Hi all! With new upstream release of libmatroska (we are now at 1.3.0), there has been a new bump for SONAME made by upstream. They moved from libmatroska4 to libmatroska5. So the source package 'libmatroska' would provide the library "libmatroska5" and the development library "libmatroska-dev". About the last one, two packages in the archives have b-deps against this devel lib: * mkvtoolnix, which requires libmatroska-dev (>= 1.1.0) * vlc, which requires libmatroska-dev (>= 0.8.0) So there seems to be no problem with the dependencies. Or am I wrong? I'm here to ask you which are the steps I'm supposed to follow to prevent any problem in the transition with this new upload. At first glance, there should be none but "asking before messing" is always the right choice ;-) Thanks a lot for your kind replies. mfv -- Il messaggio e' stato analizzato alla ricerca di virus o contenuti pericolosi da MailScanner, ed e' risultato non infetto. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e8dae50.7010...@gmail.com
Bug#635515: Bug#644506: hunspell: crash with some morphological fields combination
On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 03:46:14PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > I would have done already months ago, see > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=635515, maybe you want > to convince them to allow the transition it now that python-defaults is in? Updated list of affected packages: # grep-available -FDepends libhunspell-1.2-0 -sPackage Package: focuswriter Package: xulrunner-1.9.1 Package: libenchant1c2a Package: tea Package: licq-plugin-qt4 Package: libhunspell-dev Package: mudlet Package: iceape-browser Package: xulrunner-5.0 Package: lokalize Package: texworks Package: icedove Package: libreoffice-core Package: xulrunner-6.0 Package: goldendict Package: xulrunner-7.0 Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111006141454.gb20...@rene-engelhard.de
Bug#639871: gupnp stack reverse build dependencies
for reference:
$ for pkg in lib{gssdp,gupnp,gupnp-av,gupnp-dlna}-1.0-dev ; do grep-dctrl
-sPackage -i -r -F Build-Depends,Build-Depends-Indep "\b$pkg\b"
/var/lib/apt/lists/*_Sources ; done | awk '{ print $2 }' | sort -u
amsn
bickley
bognor-regis
enna
grilo-plugins
gupnp
gupnp-av
gupnp-igd
gupnp-tools
gupnp-vala
nautilus-sendto
rygel
upnp-router-control
Of these gupnp, gupnp-av, gupnp-vala and rygel will get sourceful uploads.
The rest should hopefully just need a binNMU.
--
Andreas Henriksson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111006154902.ga9...@amd64.fatal.se
Bug#633561: kfreebsd-i386 d-i/squeeze FTBFS (was Re: Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1)
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 07:20:50 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: 2011/10/6 Adam D. Barratt : test -e ./tmp/cdrom/tree/boot/zfs || rmdir ./tmp/cdrom/tree/boot/ rmdir: failed to remove `./tmp/cdrom/tree/boot/': Directory not empty [...] $ debdiff kernel-image-8.1-1-486-di_0.6_kfreebsd-i386.udeb kernel-image-8.1-1-486-di_0.6+b1_kfreebsd-i386.udeb [...] Files in second .deb but not in first - -rw-r--r-- root/root /boot/acpi.ko This appears to be due to the fact that the new kfreebsd-8 +squeeze1 kernel on -i386 builds acpi.ko as a module, which is then picked up by existing "install this module if it exists" rules in kernel-wedge. Actually, the problem is not presence of acpi.ko itself, but the fact that a symlink to this file exists in /boot/. This is due to an old postinst kludge from pre-GRUB time. Okay. A quick fix would be appreciated, whether from the kfreebsd or d-i side, given the increasingly short period of time we have remaining until the point release is scheduled. Attached patch should fix the problem. I can upload a fixed kfreebsd-8 this evening (feel free to NMU if someone has time to verify earlier than that). Forgive my ignorance on the precise mechanics, but is it correct that the /boot/kernel/kernel.gz symlink creation was also removed? Would you be able to also upload a kfreebsd-i386 build? That would help reduce the turnaround time before we can schedule a rebuild of kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/ac1933eacf629d91a4529827b879e...@adsl.funky-badger.org
Re: libmatroska: SONAME bump
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 15:34:08 +0200, Matteo Vescovi wrote: > [I'm not subscribed; please, Cc me in case of reply] > > Hi all! > > With new upstream release of libmatroska (we are now at 1.3.0), > there has been a new bump for SONAME made by upstream. > They moved from libmatroska4 to libmatroska5. > > So the source package 'libmatroska' would provide the library > "libmatroska5" and the development library "libmatroska-dev". > About the last one, two packages in the archives have b-deps against > this devel lib: > > * mkvtoolnix, which requires libmatroska-dev (>= 1.1.0) > * vlc, which requires libmatroska-dev (>= 0.8.0) > > So there seems to be no problem with the dependencies. Or am I wrong? > Are there any API changes in the new version that would affect those packages? Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111006164851.gg2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
Bug#622279: marked as done (transition: python-defaults (switching default: 2.6 -> 2.7))
Your message dated Thu, 6 Oct 2011 19:52:31 +0200 with message-id <20111006175231.gj2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr> and subject line Re: Bug#622279: transition: python-defaults has caused the Debian Bug report #622279, regarding transition: python-defaults (switching default: 2.6 -> 2.7) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 622279: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622279 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition This transition is the first major step of meeting the Python release goal for Wheezy. The plan in this step is to drop python2.5 and add python2.7 in supported versions. The default python will remain python2.6. The affected packages have been identified: http://release.debian.org/transitions/python2.7.html Because the default python version isn't changing, these do not have to be done all at once. They can be done in smaller batches so as not to impact other transitions or overload the buildds. It would be best to do packages that are used by other packages as build-depends. There are a few packages that directly depend on python2.5 that will have to be ported to a newer python version or removed, but the list is small and we can deal with them in the context of the upcoming python2.5 removal bug and not this transition. They are: freevo gozerbot libtuxcap nagios-statd python-multiprocessing Of those, python-multiprocessing will definitely be removed since it's a backport of a module included in python2.6 and later. python2.7 is already in testing. python-support, python-central, distribute, and python-stdlib-extensions will need updates. I've discussed this with maintainers/uploaders for those packages. They have either been in experimental or are trivial to prepare and will be uploaded in coordination with python-defaults. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic-pae (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 13:46:34 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > This transition is the first major step of meeting the Python release goal for > Wheezy. The plan in this step is to drop python2.5 and add python2.7 in > supported versions. The default python will remain python2.6. > > The affected packages have been identified: > > http://release.debian.org/transitions/python2.7.html > I think we can call this one done. Thanks to everyone involved. Cheers, Julien --- End Message ---
Bug#640513: marked as done (transition: libgeotiff-dfsg)
Your message dated Thu, 6 Oct 2011 19:56:02 +0200 with message-id <20111006175602.gk2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr> and subject line Re: Bug#640513: transition: libgeotiff-dfsg has caused the Debian Bug report #640513, regarding transition: libgeotiff-dfsg to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 640513: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=640513 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi there we are going to upload version 1.3.0-1 of the Geotiff library, which has a bump in its soname. It requires rebuilding for all reverse dependencies below: * xastir * ossim * grads * libterralib * vxl * librasterlite * liblas -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-1-686-pae (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 14:28:29 +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: > we are going to upload version 1.3.0-1 of the Geotiff library, which has a > bump in > its soname. It requires rebuilding for all reverse dependencies below: > > * xastir > * ossim > * grads > * libterralib > * vxl > * librasterlite > * liblas > I think that's all done and in testing now, closing. Cheers, Julien --- End Message ---
Bug#641260: marked as done (nmus for #640513, libgeotiff)
Your message dated Thu, 6 Oct 2011 19:56:02 +0200 with message-id <20111006175602.gk2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr> and subject line Re: Bug#640513: transition: libgeotiff-dfsg has caused the Debian Bug report #640513, regarding nmus for #640513, libgeotiff to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 640513: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=640513 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu xastir_2.0.0-2 . ALL . -m "transition as in #640513" nmu ossim_1.7.21-3 . ALL . -m "transition as in #640513" nmu grads_2.0.a9-2 . ALL . -m "transition as in #640513" nmu libterralib_4.0.0-3 . ALL . -m "transition as in #640513" nmu vxl_1.14.0-8 . ALL . -m "transition as in #640513" nmu librasterlite_1.0-3 . ALL . -m "transition as in #640513" nmu liblas_1.2.1-3 . ALL . -m "transition as in #640513" -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-1-686-pae (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 14:28:29 +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: > we are going to upload version 1.3.0-1 of the Geotiff library, which has a > bump in > its soname. It requires rebuilding for all reverse dependencies below: > > * xastir > * ossim > * grads > * libterralib > * vxl > * librasterlite > * liblas > I think that's all done and in testing now, closing. Cheers, Julien --- End Message ---
Processed: closing 637404, closing 636513, closing 636524, closing 638891, closing 642579, closing 636150 ...
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # The update associated with each of the bugs was included in the 5.0.9 point > release > close 637404 5.0.9 Bug#637404: opu: aptitude: diff for NMU version 0.4.11.11-1~lenny2 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 5.0.9, send any further explanations to Jonathan Wiltshire > close 636513 5.0.9 Bug#636513: opu: package atop/1.23-1 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 5.0.9, send any further explanations to Jonathan Wiltshire > close 636524 5.0.9 Bug#636524: opu: pmake: diff for NMU version 1.111-1+lenny1 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 5.0.9, send any further explanations to Jonathan Wiltshire > close 638891 5.0.9 Bug#638891: opu: package tzdata/2011h-0lenny1 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 5.0.9, send any further explanations to Aurelien Jarno > close 642579 5.0.9 Bug#642579: opu: package openssl/0.9.8g-15+lenny13 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 5.0.9, send any further explanations to Raphael Geissert > close 636150 5.0.9 Bug#636150: opu: package xorg-server/2:1.4.2-10.lenny4 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 5.0.9, send any further explanations to Julien Cristau > close 629989 5.0.9 Bug#629989: opu: package sun-java6/6-26-0lenny1 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 5.0.9, send any further explanations to Torsten Werner > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 629989: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=629989 642579: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=642579 638891: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=638891 636150: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=636150 636513: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=636513 637404: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=637404 636524: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=636524 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131792436620326.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#624807: libav 0.7 transition
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 18:56:57 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Here's a status update on the libav transition. The old ffmpeg package > still needs to vanish from testing. > > I've NMUd libphash and elmerfem today. > Thanks. > The following packages are present in testing and FTBFS when built > against libav/0.7.1. The bugs have been usertagged with the user > j...@debian.org and the tag libav07: > > picard (638244) (last maint upload in 2009) > avbin (632133) (last maint upload in 2009) > kino (634214) (last maint upload in 2009) > electricsheep (638560) (last maint upload in 2009) > -> I suggest to remove these four from testing, some have reverse > Recommends, but no rev deps exist > Hinted out. > motion (640562) > gnash (638249) > Gnash is now fixed. In wheezy, there's also: - imageshack-uploader (OOD on some archs where one of its build-deps doesn't exist anymore; need a bug filed), - lynkeos.app (part of gnustep transition), - paraview (RC-buggy), - cherokee (FTBFS on mips; need a bug filed). Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111006181519.gl2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
Bug#622371: transition: webkit
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 20:12:13 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 17:45:11 +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote: > > > Could you please binNMU the following packages: > > > > nmu bibledit_4.0-1 gmpc-plugins_0.20.0-1 kazehakase_0.5.8-4 surf_0.4.1-4 > > swt-gtk_3.7-2 uzbl_0.0.0~git.20110412-1 webkit-image_0.0.svn25399-2 > > xtrkcad_1:4.0.2-2 yelp_2.30.1+webkit-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against > > libwebkitgtk-1.0-0' > > nmu postler_0.1.1-1 . ia64 sparc . -m 'Rebuild against libwebkitgtk-1.0-0' > > nmu gimp_2.6.11-3 liferea_1.6.5-1.2 . ia64 . -m 'Rebuild against > > libwebkitgtk-1.0-0' > > > Scheduled. Thanks for the list. > That's all done now. Please get the webkit source package removed from unstable by filing a bug against ftp.debian.org. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111006182033.gm2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
Bug#622134: transition: openssl 1.0.0
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 16:02:14 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > This is to track the transition of openssl 1.0.0. Most of the > problems are related to dropping SSLv2 support. > openssl098 is still kept in testing by: - ace (ICE on armel) - beid (RC-buggy, candidate for removal) - ipsec-tools (#619687 #643570, has reverse dependencies) - isakmpd (#622051, candidate for removal) - isdnutils (#618228, has reverse dependencies) - pantomime1.2 (part of the gnustep transition) - transgui (#632532, candidate for removal) A fix for the ones with reverse dependencies would be nice... Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111006184622.gn2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
Processed: bug 547393 has no owner
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > noowner 547393 Bug #547393 [release.debian.org] transition: libjpeg8 Removed annotation that Bug was owned by madco...@debian.org. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 547393: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=547393 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131792693732346.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Re: libmatroska: SONAME bump
On Do, Okt 06, 2011 at 18:48:51 (CEST), Julien Cristau wrote: > On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 15:34:08 +0200, Matteo Vescovi wrote: > >> [I'm not subscribed; please, Cc me in case of reply] >> >> Hi all! >> >> With new upstream release of libmatroska (we are now at 1.3.0), >> there has been a new bump for SONAME made by upstream. >> They moved from libmatroska4 to libmatroska5. >> >> So the source package 'libmatroska' would provide the library >> "libmatroska5" and the development library "libmatroska-dev". >> About the last one, two packages in the archives have b-deps against >> this devel lib: >> >> * mkvtoolnix, which requires libmatroska-dev (>= 1.1.0) >> * vlc, which requires libmatroska-dev (>= 0.8.0) >> >> So there seems to be no problem with the dependencies. Or am I wrong? >> > Are there any API changes in the new version that would affect those > packages? I don't expect any problems because of API churn. In fact, not even binNMUs are necessary, as I expect quick sourceful uploads anyways. -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/8762k2os4l@faui43f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de
Re: Update for dokuwiki/lenny
Thijs Kinkhorst, 2011-10-06 14:34 UTC+0200: > OK. Tanguy, if you update your target distribution to oldstable-security > and upload to security-master, we can release it. Thank you Philipp, I have just done so. -- ,--. : /` ) Tanguy Ortolo | `-'Debian Maintainer \_ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#630201: transition: liblzma 5
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 04:56:55 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > I would like to upload liblzma5 to unstable, so liblzma in wheezy can > match the upstream ABI. > > Relative to what's currently in sid, this involves a soname bump > (2 → 5), introduction of versioned symbols, and some changes to the > padding at the end of structs. liblzma never looks at this padding > so even by simulating the worst case (liblzma2 and liblzma5 being > indirect dependencies of a single binary through different paths, > resulting in the two versions sharing a process image) I haven't been > able to make it cause any trouble for partial upgrades. And I'm not > aware of any packages that would trigger that worst case. > I think this should be ok at this point, feel free to upload to sid. Thanks for bearing with us for this long... Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111006201509.go2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
Bug#635515: transition: hunspell
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 15:43:02 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > hunspell 1.3.1 already changed ABI (bugt that was not reflected in the > version, > that was fixed in 1.3.2) but int also has many fixes and improvements > over 1.2.x.. So I'd like to upload it so sid (LibreOffice is in it's > development tree already using 1.3.x, too) and this needs a transition... > Feel free to upload to sid. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111006201644.gp2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
Bug#633561: kfreebsd-i386 d-i/squeeze FTBFS (was Re: Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1)
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 07:20:50 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > Attached patch should fix the problem. I can upload a fixed > kfreebsd-8 this evening (feel free to NMU if someone has time to > verify earlier than that). > What's the status of that upload? Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111006202051.gq2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
Bug#633561: kfreebsd-i386 d-i/squeeze FTBFS (was Re: Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1)
2011/10/6 Julien Cristau :
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 07:20:50 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>
>> Attached patch should fix the problem. I can upload a fixed
>> kfreebsd-8 this evening (feel free to NMU if someone has time to
>> verify earlier than that).
>>
> What's the status of that upload?
I realized the symlink in kfreebsd-8 had nothing to do with this. The
actual problem was in kernel-wedge and kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386.
I've just NMUed both packages.
Debdiffs attached.
--
Robert Millan
diff -Nru kernel-wedge-2.74+squeeze3/commands/install-files kernel-wedge-2.74+squeeze3.1/commands/install-files
--- kernel-wedge-2.74+squeeze3/commands/install-files 2011-04-05 04:45:45.0 +0200
+++ kernel-wedge-2.74+squeeze3.1/commands/install-files 2011-10-06 23:01:33.0 +0200
@@ -67,11 +67,6 @@
doit("install", "-D", "-m", 644,
"$sourcedir/boot/kfreebsd-$installedname.gz",
"debian/kernel-image-$kernelversion-$flavour-di/boot/kfreebsd$extraname.gz");
- if (-e "$sourcedir/lib/modules/$kernelversion-$flavour/acpi.ko") {
- doit("install", "-D", "-m", 644,
-"$sourcedir/lib/modules/$kernelversion-$flavour/acpi.ko",
-"debian/kernel-image-$kernelversion-$flavour-di/boot/acpi$extraname.ko");
- }
}
else {
die "could not find kernel image";
diff -Nru kernel-wedge-2.74+squeeze3/debian/changelog kernel-wedge-2.74+squeeze3.1/debian/changelog
--- kernel-wedge-2.74+squeeze3/debian/changelog 2011-06-22 03:09:24.0 +0200
+++ kernel-wedge-2.74+squeeze3.1/debian/changelog 2011-10-06 23:04:09.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+kernel-wedge (2.74+squeeze3.1) stable-proposed-updates; urgency=low
+
+ * NMU.
+ * Stop considering acpi.ko as part of the kernel for kFreeBSD.
+
+ -- Robert Millan Thu, 06 Oct 2011 21:02:18 +
+
kernel-wedge (2.74+squeeze3) stable-proposed-updates; urgency=low
* scsi-extra-modules: hpsa
diff -Nru kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386-0.6/debian/changelog kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386-0.6.1/debian/changelog
--- kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386-0.6/debian/changelog 2011-01-10 15:45:57.0 +0100
+++ kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386-0.6.1/debian/changelog 2011-10-06 23:05:54.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386 (0.6.1) stable; urgency=low
+
+ * NMU.
+ * Rebuild with latest kernel-wedge. Bump build-dependency.
+
+ -- Robert Millan Thu, 06 Oct 2011 21:05:05 +
+
kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386 (0.6) unstable; urgency=low
* Build against version 8.1+dfsg-7.1.
diff -Nru kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386-0.6/debian/control kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386-0.6.1/debian/control
--- kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386-0.6/debian/control 2011-01-10 16:03:41.0 +0100
+++ kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386-0.6.1/debian/control 2011-10-06 23:06:34.0 +0200
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Uploaders: Otavio Salvador , Aurelien Jarno
-Build-Depends: kernel-wedge (>= 2.66), kfreebsd-image-8.1-1-486 [kfreebsd-i386]
+Build-Depends: kernel-wedge (>= 2.74+squeeze3.1), kfreebsd-image-8.1-1-486 [kfreebsd-i386]
Package: kernel-image-8.1-1-486-di
XC-Package-Type: udeb
diff -Nru kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386-0.6/debian/control.stub kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386-0.6.1/debian/control.stub
--- kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386-0.6/debian/control.stub 2010-08-23 02:02:59.0 +0200
+++ kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386-0.6.1/debian/control.stub 2011-10-06 23:04:53.0 +0200
@@ -3,4 +3,4 @@
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Uploaders: Otavio Salvador , Aurelien Jarno
-Build-Depends: kernel-wedge (>= 2.66)
+Build-Depends: kernel-wedge (>= 2.74+squeeze3.1)
Bug#633561: kfreebsd-i386 d-i/squeeze FTBFS (was Re: Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1)
2011/10/6 Adam D. Barratt : > Forgive my ignorance on the precise mechanics, but is it correct that the > /boot/kernel/kernel.gz symlink creation was also removed? Yes, this is all curft for backward compatibility with versions of Debian GNU/kFreeBSD that have never been part of a Debian release. However, it's not the cause for this problem (see my other mail). In fact it's probably harmless, and it's gone with 8.2 anyway. I wouldn't worry about them. -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOfDtXNcHrf=_6GseYRVE=+wxeqa0e8rhwedvtfvnhu4d3h...@mail.gmail.com
Lenny apt-get update problem behoben ?
Hi ich habe ein Problem mit apt-get update. Wenn ich mein installiertes Lenny updaten möchte bekomme ich immer folgende Fehler. OK http://http.us.debian.org lenny/main Sources OK http://http.us.debian.org lenny/non-free Sources Es wurden 4642kB in 14s geholt (328kB/s) Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fehler! E: Na so was, Sie haben die Anzahl an Beschreibungen überschritten, mit denen APT umgehen kann. E: Problem with MergeList /var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.debian.org_debian_dists_testing_main_i18n_Translation-de E: Die Paketliste oder die Statusdatei konnte nicht eingelesen oder geöffnet werden. Mein Lenny meldet sich zwar schon mit Version 5.09 aber warum habe ich dieses apt-get Problem ? Wie bekomme ich den Fehler beseitigt ? gateway:/etc# lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Debian Description:Debian GNU/Linux 5.0.9 (lenny) Release:5.0.9 Codename: lenny Danke im voraus. MfG Frank Hofmann
Re: Lenny apt-get update problem behoben ?
[ redirecting to d-user-german ] Hallo Frank, du hast mit deiner Mail an das Debian-Team geschrieben, das das nächste Release plant und das derzeitige verwaltet. Vielleicht hast du es nicht geahnt, aber das ist die falsche Adresse für Anwenderfragen. Davon abgesehen sind alle Mailinglisten von Debian auf englisch, weil es ein internationales Projekt gibt. Ausnahme sind die User-Listen, die es in vielen Sprachen gibt und genau solche Anwenderfragen oft beantworten können. In deinem Fall wäre deine Frage richtig aufgehoben an: debian-user-ger...@lists.debian.org Ich will dich aber nicht ganz ohne Hilfe gehen lassen, also: On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 07:44:14AM +0200, Frank Hofmann wrote: > ich habe ein Problem mit apt-get update. Wenn ich mein installiertes Lenny > updaten möchte bekomme ich immer folgende Fehler. > > OK http://http.us.debian.org lenny/main Sources > OK http://http.us.debian.org lenny/non-free Sources > Es wurden 4642kB in 14s geholt (328kB/s) > Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fehler! > E: Na so was, Sie haben die Anzahl an Beschreibungen überschritten, mit denen > APT umgehen kann. > E: Problem with MergeList /var/lib/apt/lists/ > ftp.debian.org_debian_dists_testing_main_i18n_Translation-de > E: Die Paketliste oder die Statusdatei konnte nicht eingelesen oder geöffnet > werden. > > Mein Lenny meldet sich zwar schon mit Version 5.09 aber warum habe ich dieses > apt-get Problem ? Wie bekomme ich den Fehler beseitigt ? http://tinyurl.com/3dkp5to :) Viel Erfolg! Hauke -- .''`. Jan Hauke Rahmwww.jhr-online.de : :' : Debian Developer www.debian.org `. `'` Member of the Linux Foundationwww.linux.com `- Fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe www.fsfe.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
