Re: binNMUs for gtk+2.0 / pango1.0 multiarch changes / la file removal
Hi Michael, On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 21:03:20 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Hi, > > I've just uploaded gtk+2.0_2.24.5-4 and pango1.0_1.28.4-2 > Both were converted to multiarch. > As a result the location of the .la file has changed so rdeps referencing the > old .la files will be broken. > > I checked the list at [1] for library packages which would be broken by that > change. The list is rather short, so I decided against adding workarounds and > create compat symlinks to the old location and used the opportunity to remove > the .la files completely. > > Instead I'd like you to schedule binNMUs for the affected packages. > Sorry for the delay. Can you come up with an updated list, or a script to get one? Thanks, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110917074027.gi3...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
Bug#640404: transition: network-manager
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 23:03:26 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > For the remaining packages, please schedule binNMUs for > strongswan > claws-mail > evolution > kdebase-runtime > libsocialweb > packagekit > pidgin > krb5-auth-dialog > liferea > balsa > network-manager-strongswan > empathy > geoclue > Scheduled. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110917074721.gj3...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
Processed: merging 640513 641260
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > merge 640513 641260 Bug#640513: transition: libgeotiff-dfsg Bug#641260: nmus for #640513, libgeotiff Merged 640513 641260. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 641260: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=641260 640513: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=640513 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13162514848798.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#640513: transition: libgeotiff-dfsg
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 14:28:29 +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: > we are going to upload version 1.3.0-1 of the Geotiff library, which has a > bump in > its soname. It requires rebuilding for all reverse dependencies below: So by "are going to upload" you mean "have uploaded". Same difference I guess... > > * grads Had a sourceful upload. > * xastir > * ossim > * libterralib > * vxl > * librasterlite > * liblas > Scheduled the rest. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110917094748.gk3...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
Bug#640995: nmu: serna-free_4.3.0.20110221-5
tag 640995 moreinfo kthxbye On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 11:59:38 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > as reported as #640948 by Fabrice Flore-Thebault, Serna needs a round of > binNMUs: > > nmu serna-free_4.3.0.20110221-5 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against newer > libqscintilla2-6" > What about #55? Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110917095309.gl3...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
Processed: Re: Bug#640995: nmu: serna-free_4.3.0.20110221-5
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 640995 moreinfo Bug #640995 [release.debian.org] nmu: serna-free_4.3.0.20110221-5 Added tag(s) moreinfo. > kthxbye Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 640995: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=640995 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131625321717743.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#640995: nmu: serna-free_4.3.0.20110221-5
Hi, Am Samstag, den 17.09.2011, 11:53 +0200 schrieb Julien Cristau: > tag 640995 moreinfo > kthxbye > > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 11:59:38 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > > as reported as #640948 by Fabrice Flore-Thebault, Serna needs a round of > > binNMUs: > > > > nmu serna-free_4.3.0.20110221-5 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against newer > > libqscintilla2-6" > > > What about #55? good question. Mathieu, are we missing some build dependency here? Greetings, joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processed: tagging 640513
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 640513 + pending Bug #640513 [release.debian.org] transition: libgeotiff-dfsg Bug #641260 [release.debian.org] nmus for #640513, libgeotiff Added tag(s) pending. Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 640513: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=640513 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131625346519090.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Re: new hardware support: calling for testing
Hi all,
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 01:16:50AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
[...]
Ben, thank you for the draft!
Below my proposal (only few lines integrating Ben's draft):
[@publicity team: I've added it also to svn repo, feel free to improve
it!]
== Upcoming point releases and call for tests ==
{The Debian Project is pleased to announce | Philipp Kern, on behalf of
the Release Team, announced} that the upcoming point releases for Debian
5 Lenny and Debian 6 Squeeze are scheduled for October 1st
and October 8th respectively.
Debian Squeeze 6.0.3 will ship updated Linux kernel packages,
including bug fixes from the Linux 'longterm' series up to 2.6.32.46,
plus updated drivers supporting new gigabit Ethernet chips from Broadcom,
Intel, and Realtek.
New packages for 32-bit PC, 64-bit PC and PowerPC are already available
for installation
from the 'stable-proposed-updates' suite
.
The Debian project invites interested users to pre-release test these
packages, especially on systems that use the updated drivers, possibly
within September 24th: so that if there will not be regressions, the new
drivers will be added to the upcoming point release.
The drivers being updated are:
* e1000e (#627700)
- Add support for i82567V-4 and i82579
- Fix support for i82577, i82578 and i82583
* igb, igbvf (#627702)
- Add support for i82576-ET2, i82580, DH89xxCC, i340 and i350
* r8169 (#627704)
- Fix support for RTL8102E and RTL8168DP
- Add support for RTL8105E, RTL8168E and another variant of
RTL8168DP
- Add support for D-Link DGE-530T rev C1
* tg3, broadcom (#627705)
- Add support for BCM5717, BCM5719, BCM57765
- Add support for BCM50610M and BCM5241 PHYs
- Fix support for BCM5755
Any problems found in testing should be reported to the Debian bug
tracking system using the 'reportbug' tool. In case of regressions in
the updated drivers, please follow up to the bug number listed above.
===
Cheers,
Francesca
--
"Ford!" he said, "there's an infinite number of monkeys outside who want
to talk to us about this script for Hamlet they've worked out."
Douglas Adams
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#639642: pu: package xpdf/3.02-12squeeze1
tag 639642 + confirmed thanks On Sun, 2011-09-04 at 12:00 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: > Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > I'd be happy to accept the Squeeze package, with a couple of small > > tweaks: > >- please mention the bug number (i.e. #635849) in the changelog > >- please make the version 3.02-12+squeeze1 > > Fixed. See attached debdiff. Thanks. Please feel free to go ahead with that upload. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1316265158.21594.23.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Processed: Re: Bug#639642: pu: package xpdf/3.02-12squeeze1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 639642 + confirmed Bug #639642 [release.debian.org] pu: package xpdf/3.02-12squeeze1 Added tag(s) confirmed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 639642: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=639642 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13162651798599.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#637653: pu: gdebi/0.6.4+squeeze1
On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 23:59 +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote: > As agreed on IRC, I attach new debdiff with suggested adjustment. > > I also committed the change above in gdebi trunk [0]. It's not been > uploaded to unstable yet, as I'd like to include another fix which will > require a discrete amount of time to be tested on several environments. Thanks. Is there an (even vague) ETA for the other fix being in a suitable condition to be uploaded? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1316270318.21594.24.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#637653: pu: gdebi/0.6.4+squeeze1
Il 17/09/2011 16:38, Adam D. Barratt ha scritto: > Thanks. Is there an (even vague) ETA for the other fix being in a > suitable condition to be uploaded? Not soon enough to rush an early commit. I could finalize other little changes (mostly translations), and upload a new revision to unstable including the regex change. That could happen within today. -- .''`. : :' : Luca Falavigna `. `' `- signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#637114: pu: package grub2/1.98+20100804-15
On Sat, 2011-08-27 at 12:00 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > 2011/8/27 Jonathan Nieder : > >> #601974 is indeed fixed in unstable, it wasn't closed in changelog > >> because the fix was applied directly to upstream (and included with > >> 1.99-1 upload). I've closed that bug and put everyone involved on CC. > >> > >> #610184 might not be fixed in unstable according to this report: > >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610184#64 . Given > >> the situation I wouldn't include it in this proposed update. > > > > Thanks. Do you have an updated patch for review? > > Here you are. Thanks, and apologies for the delay. How much testing have the proposed patches had on Squeeze systems? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1316272848.21594.33.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: binNMU for libjpeg8 migration (2nd try)
Hi Bill, I scheduled a first batch: On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 10:58:24 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > ayttm 0.6.3-2 Already rebuilt > flightgear 2.0.0-4 Already rebuilt on !kfreebsd-amd64 > gargoyle-free 2010.1-2 Already rebuilt. > ghostscript 9.02~dfsg-3 Has a FTBFS bug. > ffmpegthumbnailer 2.0.6-4 Scheduled, but as it build-depends on libjpeg62-dev | libjpeg-dev I think that's not going to work. > gnash 0.8.10~git20110618-3 Has a FTBFS bug (#638247) > gnustep-gui 0.18.0-5 Part of gnustep transition I'll leave that alone. > afterstep 2.2.11-4 > analog 2:6.0-19 > dcraw 8.99-1 > djvulibre 3.5.24-8 > epm 4.2-1 > fgfs-atlas 0.3.1-2 > fox1.6 1.6.44-1.1 > freeimage 3.10.0-4 > gimp 2.6.11-3 > gle-graphics 4.2.2-4 > graphviz 2.26.3-7 Scheduled those. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110917154724.gp3...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1
tags 633561 + moreinfo squeeze thanks Hi, Apologies for letting this fall between the cracks for so long. On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 17:46 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > Please consider this update for kfreebsd-8 in squeeze. It fixes a security > bug, a kernel panic condition in if_msk driver, and disables a buggy patch > which disabled 58 kernel modules (including many drivers for USB devices > and a few network cards) from the build system. > > * Fix net802.11 stack kernel memory disclosure (CVE-2011-2480). > (Closes: #631160) > - 000_net80211_disclosure.diff This looks okay, although I think you meant #631161. Your last message in the log there says "uploaded to unstable, but the bug is still open with no fixed versions recorded. Please could you clarify the status here? > * Merge backported if_msk driver from 8-STABLE. (Closes: #628954) > - 000_msk_backport.diff This should be okay, assuming that the resulting driver has been tested on Squeeze systems. A targetted fix would be preferable, but it sounds from the upstream report as if that's not particularly easy to accomplish. > * Disable buggy 009_disable_duped_modules.diff. It was disabling many > more modules than built into kernel (e.g. all USB modules). A few queries here, I'm afraid. - What's the effect of re-enabling the (duplicate) building of the modules which were intended to be disabled? - Does this affect which modules end up in the udebs? - The changelog comment from when the patch was introduced says that it made a ~4MB difference to the size of the image. As that was 2007, I'm assuming that the size difference is a fair bit larger now? - If the impact of the patch was to disable all USB modules, why was it not disabled sooner? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1316274864.21594.48.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Processed: Re: Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 633561 + moreinfo squeeze Bug #633561 [release.debian.org] pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-9 Added tag(s) squeeze and moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 633561: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=633561 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131627488425140.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Re: new hardware support: calling for testing
On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 15:00 +0200, Francesca Ciceri wrote: [...] > The Debian project invites interested users to pre-release test these > packages, especially on systems that use the updated drivers, possibly > within September 24th: so that if there will not be regressions, the new > drivers will be added to the upcoming point release. [...] If there are regressions, we want to fix them, not revert all the changes. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings If you seem to know what you are doing, you'll be given more to do. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#618026: ibid: Ibid 0.1.1 contains 3 security fixes
tag 618026 + squeeze moreinfo - upstream patch security retitle 618026 pu: package ibid/0.1.0+dfsg-2+squeeze1 thanks On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 22:07 +0200, Stefano Rivera wrote: > reassign 618026 release.debian.org If you're going to do that, you need to either (preferably) CC the receiving package on your mail, or send a separate mail. What tends to happen (as in this case) is that the control@ reassign gets processed after the rest of the mail has been received and the new package only gets the control@ output with no other information. > > Ibid 0.1.1 fixes 3 security issues [0]. They aren't particularly serious, > > but > > should probably be addressed. > > Right, clearly not significant enough for the usual security route. > > Here's a stable targeted debdiff, with an additional fix. Thanks for working on this. One quick question - doesn't this change: +- logfile-visibility-567576.patch: Channels must be explicitly configured + to have publicly readable logs. (LP: #567576) have the potential to at least confuse users who are expecting the logs to be created in a publicly readable manner? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1316275753.21594.55.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#637653: pu: gdebi/0.6.4+squeeze1
On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 16:51 +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote: > Il 17/09/2011 16:38, Adam D. Barratt ha scritto: > > Thanks. Is there an (even vague) ETA for the other fix being in a > > suitable condition to be uploaded? > > Not soon enough to rush an early commit. Completely understood. > I could finalize other little changes (mostly translations), and > upload a new revision to unstable including the regex change. That > could happen within today. That would be good if possible. Thanks, and apologies for the delay in getting back to you about this (again :/). Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1316275852.21594.56.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#638190: pu: package shelldap/0.2-1+squeeze1
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 12:45 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 09:56:44PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 16:46 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > ++ eval 'use IO::Socket::SSL';
> > ++ die qq{IO::Socket::SSL not installed, but is required for
> > SSL or TLS connections.
[...]
> I agree, changing it to
>
> eval { require IO::Socket::SSL; };
> die qq{...} if $@;
>
> is probably more clean. I can change this in the proposed debdiff and
> also suggest it to upstream. Using
I'm still arguing with myself a little here. Theoretically we should
use the fix from unstable, but the suggested improvement seems obviously
correct (and not just because I suggested it *g*).
> > > Is it possible that I can upload an updated package with 1) upstreams
> > > fix on the error message, and 2) furthermore add of Recommends on
> > >
> > >
> > > libio-socket-ssl-perl?
> >
> > Hmmm. We generally don't change dependencies in stable updates; I'm
> > debating the extent to which recommends should be treated in the same
> > way.
[...]
> I would like to have it more easely for users of shelldap, and I had
> already two bugreports about it. So if at least if the error message
> could be clearer it would be an improvement.
I think I'd prefer that option, to be honest.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/1316275929.21594.57.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Processed: Re: Bug#618026: ibid: Ibid 0.1.1 contains 3 security fixes
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 618026 + squeeze moreinfo - upstream patch security Bug #618026 [release.debian.org] ibid: Ibid 0.1.1 contains 3 security fixes Added tag(s) squeeze and moreinfo. Bug #618026 [release.debian.org] ibid: Ibid 0.1.1 contains 3 security fixes Removed tag(s) upstream, security, and patch. > retitle 618026 pu: package ibid/0.1.0+dfsg-2+squeeze1 Bug #618026 [release.debian.org] ibid: Ibid 0.1.1 contains 3 security fixes Changed Bug title to 'pu: package ibid/0.1.0+dfsg-2+squeeze1' from 'ibid: Ibid 0.1.1 contains 3 security fixes' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 618026: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=618026 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131627577229416.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#639676: pu: package pbuilder/0.199+nmu1
tag 639676 + squeeze moreinfo thanks On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 12:26 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > Trying to use pdebuild against sid in squeeze fails with: > /usr/sbin/pbuilder: line 120: /var/cache/pbuilder/build//32247/run: Is a > directory > (bug#627086). > > Would the following change be ok for a stable update? [...] > + * Cherry-pick from 0.199+nmu4: Rename the /run script from --execute to > +/runscript, for compatibility with wheezy and later which have /run as a > +directory replacing /var/run (bug#627086) Is the script ever used or accessed by anything outside of pbuilder's internals? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1316276567.21594.61.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Processed: Re: Bug#639676: pu: package pbuilder/0.199+nmu1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 639676 + squeeze moreinfo Bug #639676 [release.debian.org] pu: package pbuilder/0.199+nmu1 Added tag(s) squeeze and moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 639676: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=639676 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13162765861177.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Re: [SRM] nagvis upload for stable?
On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 11:28 +0200, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: > I just joined the pkg-nagios team and am now taking care of the nagvis > package, which is in a less than ideal state in the current release. [...] > #620037 - serious piuparts bug; package fails to purge > #611909 - Missing path for "gadgets" in created configuration > #632333 - Apache configuration error (Option FollowSymLinks) [...] > If possible, I'd also like to fix an unreported bug I just noticed > today: Documentation isn't installed. [...] > And finnally, I'd like to address #626456 a little bit, by adding that > to the README.Debian file. Please go ahead; thanks. It would be good if the documentation update for #626456 also made it into unstable. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1316277142.21594.64.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#637111: pu: package freebsd-libs/8.1-6
tag 637111 + squeeze moreinfo thanks On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 14:51 +, Robert Millan wrote: > This fixes configurations where /usr is a separate filesystem using > either ZFS or a network file system: > > * Move libsbuf.so.0 to /lib (needed by /sbin/zfs and /sbin/zpool). > (Closes: #637100) > * Move libipx.so.2 to /lib (needed by ifconfig). Have the portions of this change which affect the udebs been run past the d-i team? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1316277696.21594.68.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Processed: Re: Bug#637111: pu: package freebsd-libs/8.1-6
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 637111 + squeeze moreinfo Bug #637111 [release.debian.org] pu: package freebsd-libs/8.1-6 Added tag(s) squeeze and moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 637111: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=637111 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13162777156540.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#637653: pu: gdebi/0.6.4+squeeze1
gdebi 0.8.2 just landed in unstable. -- .''`. : :' : Luca Falavigna `. `' `- signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#637840: pu: package git/1:1.7.2.5-3
tag 637840 + moreinfo thanks On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 19:33 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > 1. Upstream's maint-1.7.2 branch gets very few changes, but there have > been a few since 1.7.2.5 was released: Thanks for working on this, and apologies for not getting back to you sooner. > - fix off-by-one bug that makes git read past the end of a buffer >when extracting the first line from an empty commit message (and >include an extra line when the first line is blank) It's annoying how many different places that particular task was performed in. :-/ (I realise one of the points of the change is to consolidate the functionality). Also, revert-* is a confusing name for patches. It took me a short while to realise that they were patches to "git revert", not reversions of other patches. Maybe that's just me though. :-) > - fast-import: accept no-op "feature notes" command for frontends >use to declare they require an importer able to write notes. > > Of those, the fast-import change probably seems iffy (since it does > not fix a critical bug) but I would prefer to include it to match > upstream. I did think "hmmm" at this change, yeah. Am I correct that the current behaviour is that the import simply fails, and leaves the tree in an indeterminate state? > 3. git-daemon-run.postrm purge: always terminate logging process more > aggressively so the logging user can be removed and the package > purged when a connection is active (also thanks to dkg, Bug#627314). What's the effect on the process using the connection when it's forcibly terminated? Lost log data? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1316280010.21594.75.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Processed: Re: Bug#637840: pu: package git/1:1.7.2.5-3
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 637840 + moreinfo Bug #637840 [release.debian.org] pu: package git/1:1.7.2.5-3 Added tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 637840: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=637840 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131628001516838.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Re: Upcoming Point Releases
On Sun, 2011-09-11 at 23:59 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 21:30 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > > Hi, > > > > we finally got target dates for the next point releases of both Lenny > > and Squeeze. Lenny should get 5.0.9 on October 1st; Squeeze will follow > > on October 8th with 6.0.3. > > > > NEW for Lenny will be closed on the weekend of September 24th; NEW for > > Squeeze on the weekend of October 1st. > > > > The upload of debian-installer for Lenny should happen on the closing > > weekend at the latest; the middle of week 38 would be appreciated, so > > that we have everything together on the 24th. > > > > For Squeeze it would be cool to have the kernel in for testing end of > > next week (16/17th). The d-i upload should be there the middle of week > > 39, October 1st at the latest. > [...] > > I believe we're now ready to do the kernel update, having got most of > the security fixes done separately. I'm going to start a build now and > intend to upload tomorrow unless I hear any objection to this (or I find > a problem myself). I also intend to upload an updated firmware-nonfree package (version 0.28+squeeze1): * Add VIA VT6656 firmware for use with vt6656 driver In Linux 2.6.32 this driver had embedded firmware; we removed that and did not build the driver. In linux-2.6 version 2.6.32-31 (point release 6.0.1) we updated the driver to support external firmware and started building it. * Add Realtek RTL8105E-1 and RTL8168E-1/2/3 firmware for use with r8169 Some of the new chips supported by the updated r8169 driver in linux-2.6 version 2.6.32-36 should have these firmware patches. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings If you seem to know what you are doing, you'll be given more to do. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Update for widelands in stable
Hi, On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 22:07 +0200, Enrico Tassi wrote: > I've prepared an update for widelands in squeeze in response to > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=624316 > > The security fix 1:15-3squeeze1 for bug #617960 introduced this extra > bug, so this fix should really have been part of that upload, and someone > also mentioned it in the bugreport, but I missed that email. As the issue was introduced by the original stable change, please go ahead. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1316281356.21594.89.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: Gajim 0.13.4-4
On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 09:34 +0200, Yann Leboulanger wrote: > I fixed an important functionality bug in Gajim that makes it use 100% > CPU when connecting (#634880) [0]. I added a patch (attached) that is > already in newer versions of Gajim for months [1]. > > The package is ready, can I ask my Debian developper to upload it? [...] > [0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=634880 > [1] http://trac.gajim.org/ticket/5991 You mention that the patch is "in newer versions [...] for months" but the package in unstable still appears to check for PENDING_READ before checking for IS_CLOSED. Please could you confirm exactly when the patch was applied? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1316281700.21594.92.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#637664: Re: Bug#637664: pu: package tzdata/2011h-0squeeze1
On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 16:40 +0200, Youssef Eldakar wrote: > On 01/-10/-28163 09:59 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 17:23 +0400, Eugene Barbashin wrote: [Russian law changes on October 30th] > > For the record, after some discussion with the maintainers on IRC and as > > the next point releases for both stable and oldstable are due to occur > > before mid-October, we've decided not to push an update earlier. There > > may be an update to either package before the point release in order to > > incorporate any further changes. > > Well, in Egypt, as of the last Friday of April 2011, a Squeeze > installation has incorrect time. I believe pushing an update is worth > reconsidering. If it's broken for more than four months now, why has nobody mentioned the issue before? tzdata maintainers - any thoughts here? I know Aurelien mentioned that there was probably another update for lenny/squeeze appearing before the point releases in any case, but I'm not sure what the status is there. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1316282221.21594.98.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#638190: pu: package shelldap/0.2-1+squeeze1
Hi Adam
Thank you for your reply.
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 05:12:09PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 12:45 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 09:56:44PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 16:46 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > > ++ eval 'use IO::Socket::SSL';
> > > ++ die qq{IO::Socket::SSL not installed, but is required for
> > > SSL or TLS connections.
> [...]
> > I agree, changing it to
> >
> > eval { require IO::Socket::SSL; };
> > die qq{...} if $@;
> >
> > is probably more clean. I can change this in the proposed debdiff and
> > also suggest it to upstream. Using
>
> I'm still arguing with myself a little here. Theoretically we should
> use the fix from unstable, but the suggested improvement seems obviously
> correct (and not just because I suggested it *g*).
:-)
> > > > Is it possible that I can upload an updated package with 1) upstreams
> > > > fix on the error message, and 2) furthermore add of Recommends on
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > libio-socket-ssl-perl?
> > >
> > > Hmmm. We generally don't change dependencies in stable updates; I'm
> > > debating the extent to which recommends should be treated in the same
> > > way.
> [...]
> > I would like to have it more easely for users of shelldap, and I had
> > already two bugreports about it. So if at least if the error message
> > could be clearer it would be an improvement.
>
> I think I'd prefer that option, to be honest.
Please find attached the proposed debdiff without the Recommends
addition. It takes upstream patch but with the discussed change to use
an eval block, and a require instead of use.
Regards,
Salvatore
diff -u shelldap-0.2/debian/changelog shelldap-0.2/debian/changelog
--- shelldap-0.2/debian/changelog
+++ shelldap-0.2/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+shelldap (0.2-1+squeeze1) stable; urgency=low
+
+ * Add ssl-errmsg.patch to exit with a nicer error message if IO::Socket::SSL
+isn't installed, but the user is requesting SSL/TLS.
+(Closes: #614350, #638062).
+ * Email change: Salvatore Bonaccorso -> car...@debian.org
+
+ -- Salvatore Bonaccorso Sat, 17 Sep 2011 19:42:30 +0200
+
shelldap (0.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Initial release (Closes: #548271)
diff -u shelldap-0.2/debian/copyright shelldap-0.2/debian/copyright
--- shelldap-0.2/debian/copyright
+++ shelldap-0.2/debian/copyright
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
Files: debian/*
-Copyright: 2009, Salvatore Bonaccorso
+Copyright: 2009, Salvatore Bonaccorso
License: BSD
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
diff -u shelldap-0.2/debian/control shelldap-0.2/debian/control
--- shelldap-0.2/debian/control
+++ shelldap-0.2/debian/control
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
Source: shelldap
Section: utils
Priority: optional
-Maintainer: Salvatore Bonaccorso
+Maintainer: Salvatore Bonaccorso
DM-Upload-Allowed: yes
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7.0.50), quilt (>= 0.46-7)
Build-Depends-Indep: perl
diff -u shelldap-0.2/debian/patches/series shelldap-0.2/debian/patches/series
--- shelldap-0.2/debian/patches/series
+++ shelldap-0.2/debian/patches/series
@@ -1,0 +2 @@
+ssl-errmsg.patch
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- shelldap-0.2.orig/debian/patches/ssl-errmsg.patch
+++ shelldap-0.2/debian/patches/ssl-errmsg.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+Description: Exit with a nicer error message if IO::Socket::SSL isn't
+ installed, but the user is requesting SSL/TLS. (this is normally
+ required by Net::LDAP.)
+Origin: vendor, http://projects.martini.nu/shelldap/attachment/ticket/8/ssl-errmsg.patch
+Bug: http://projects.martini.nu/shelldap/ticket/8
+Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/614350
+Forwarded: no
+Author: Mahlon E. Smith
+Reviewed-by: Salvatore Bonaccorso
+Last-Update: 2011-09-17
+
+--- a/shelldap
b/shelldap
+@@ -425,6 +425,16 @@
+
+ # fill in potentially missing info
+ die "No server specified.\n" unless $conf->{'server'};
++
++ # Emit a nicer error message if IO::Socket::SSL is
++ # not installed and Net::LDAP decides it is required.
++ #
++ if ( $conf->{'tls'} || $conf->{'server'} =~ m|ldaps://| ) {
++ eval { require IO::Socket::SSL; };
++ die qq{IO::Socket::SSL not installed, but is required for SSL or TLS connections.
++You may try connecting insecurely, or install the module and try again.\n} if $@;
++ }
++
+ if ( $conf->{'binddn'} && ! $conf->{'bindpass'} ) {
+ print "Bind password: ";
+ Term::ReadKey::ReadMode 2;
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#638781: RM: libgtfb/0.1.0-1
On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 06:45 +1000, Matt Flax wrote: > I am currently waiting for the key maintainers to update my new GPG key. > This will allow me to update packages. > I have been waiting some time for this to happen. How did you request the update? I can't see anything obvious in public tickets in the keyring RT queue. > I do not request that this package be removed, rather I request that my > signed key (which I have already uploaded) be added to the keyring and I > finally get the chance to fix these problems. In the meantime, maybe you could get someone else to upload a fix for the issues on your behalf, so we can get them resolved? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1316284289.21594.106.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#639645: opu: package xpdf/3.02-1.4+lenny4
I've decided that it's too risky to disable t1lib in lenny as the version of freetype there has some known issues. Attached is a new debdiff for this proposed-update. Best wishes, Mike xpdf-lenny.debdiff Description: Binary data
Bug#637840: pu: package git/1:1.7.2.5-3
Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 19:33 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: >> - fast-import: accept no-op "feature notes" command for frontends >>use to declare they require an importer able to write notes. [...] > I did think "hmmm" at this change, yeah. Am I correct that the current > behaviour is that the import simply fails, and leaves the tree in an > indeterminate state? Nah, the current behavior is even more benign than that. The version of git in squeeze already knows how to write notes but thinks it doesn't know. So if a frontend writes feature notes at the beginning of a stream, then "git fast-import" from squeeze will simply error out, no damage done. I just looked over the other updates going into squeeze for the next point release, and this change definitely looks out of place. Let's drop it. >> 3. git-daemon-run.postrm purge: always terminate logging process more >> aggressively so the logging user can be removed and the package >> purged when a connection is active (also thanks to dkg, Bug#627314). > > What's the effect on the process using the connection when it's forcibly > terminated? Lost log data? During an active connection the pipeline looks like this: helper (e.g., git upload-pack) --> git daemon --> svlogd "git daemon" is responsible for prepending the process ID to each line so concurrent connections can be distinguished in the log. When git-daemon-run.postrm calls "sv force-shutdown .../git-daemon", the logging process immediately closes its standard input. The first message the helper writes afterwards causes the git daemon process to die with SIGPIPE and in particular to close its pipe to the helper. The second message the helper logs causes it to die with SIGPIPE. In the normal case, the helper has already written everything it wanted to, so it will just finish normally. So errors after the "sv force-shutdown" call are already not being logged. What this patch does is to kill the logging process, too (so deluser can delete the gitlog user later in postrm instead of erroring out). But svlogd is not doing anything useful at that point anyway. Thanks for a helpful review. Regards, Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110917185359.GA2271@elie
Re: new hardware support: calling for testing
On Sb, 17 sep 11, 17:01:15, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 15:00 +0200, Francesca Ciceri wrote: > [...] > > The Debian project invites interested users to pre-release test these > > packages, especially on systems that use the updated drivers, possibly > > within September 24th: so that if there will not be regressions, the new > > drivers will be added to the upcoming point release. > [...] > > If there are regressions, we want to fix them, not revert all the > changes. How about this: ~~~ The Debian project invites interested users to pre-release test these packages, especially on systems that use the updated drivers. The drivers [...] Any problems found in testing should be reported to the Debian bug tracking system using the 'reportbug' tool. Reports should preferably be sent until September 24th, but later reports of serious issues will still be taken into consideration. In case of regressions in the updated drivers, please follow up to the bug number listed above. ~~~ Kind regards, Andrei -- Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [SRM] nagvis upload for stable?
Hi! * Adam D. Barratt [110917 18:32]: > Please go ahead; thanks. It would be good if the documentation update > for #626456 also made it into unstable. Many thanks, uploaded (including the documentation fix). Best Regards, Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110917191634.gc17...@melusine.alphascorpii.net
Re: new hardware support: calling for testing
On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 22:12 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote: > On Sb, 17 sep 11, 17:01:15, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 15:00 +0200, Francesca Ciceri wrote: > > [...] > > > The Debian project invites interested users to pre-release test these > > > packages, especially on systems that use the updated drivers, possibly > > > within September 24th: so that if there will not be regressions, the new > > > drivers will be added to the upcoming point release. > > [...] > > > > If there are regressions, we want to fix them, not revert all the > > changes. > > How about this: > > ~~~ > The Debian project invites interested users to pre-release test these > packages, especially on systems that use the updated drivers. > The drivers [...] > > Any problems found in testing should be reported to the Debian bug > tracking system using the 'reportbug' tool. Reports should preferably be > sent until September 24th, but later reports of serious issues will > still be taken into consideration. In case of regressions in the updated > drivers, please follow up to the bug number listed above. > ~~~ That looks fine. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings If you seem to know what you are doing, you'll be given more to do. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
NEW changes in proposedupdates
Processing changes file: nagvis_1.4.6-1.1+squeeze1_amd64.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1r56af-0002bu...@franck.debian.org
tentative upload to stable-proposed-updates [cython]
Dear Release team, I wonder would an upload to s-p-u be ok to fix a regression in cython package, which is apparently of importance for some users (who even triaged repository to the specific commit resolving the issue). Patch (see commit below) will be trivial. Please let us know so we could prepare the upload. Best, Yarik On Fri, 16 Sep 2011, Kirill Smelkov wrote: > > wow -- thanks Kirill for the details! I think within few days we will > > get 0.15 (or post 0.15 snapshot unless 0.15.1 gets released) into > > Debian which should close this issue > Thanks. It's good that 0.15.* will hopefully make it into Sid soon, but > I'd like to clarify that my point here is that we should apply the fix > for the regression to Squeeze as well. > Thanks again, > Kirill > > On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Kirill Smelkov wrote: > > > and fixed in 0.14.1-111-g78e134e (unfortunately without tests): > > > commit 78e134ede7646bacfaaafb71172fd4f86b890d0f > > > Author: Robert Bradshaw > > > Date: Thu Mar 3 11:07:23 2011 -0800 > > > Fix compile time division. > > > diff --git a/Cython/Compiler/ExprNodes.py b/Cython/Compiler/ExprNodes.py > > > index c965251..1fe8538 100755 > > > --- a/Cython/Compiler/ExprNodes.py > > > +++ b/Cython/Compiler/ExprNodes.py > > > @@ -5992,7 +5992,7 @@ class DivNode(NumBinopNode): > > > operand2 = self.operand2.compile_time_value(denv) > > > try: > > > func = self.find_compile_time_binary_operator( > > > -self, operand1, operand2) > > > +operand1, operand2) > > > return func(operand1, operand2) > > > except Exception, e: > > > self.compile_time_value_error(e) > > > which I think should be backported to Debian Cython packages. -- =--= Keep in touch www.onerussian.com Yaroslav Halchenko www.ohloh.net/accounts/yarikoptic signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug#641128: tentative upload to stable-proposed-updates [cython]
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > Dear Release team, > > I wonder would an upload to s-p-u be ok to fix a regression in cython > package, which is apparently of importance for some users (who even > triaged repository to the specific commit resolving the issue). Patch > (see commit below) will be trivial. > > Please let us know so we could prepare the upload. The fix looks good to me. Somebody else has to upload it though (I don't have the rights). Ondrej Certik (former Cython maintainer) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CADDwiVAzOoOjKoHOMaKnR=wbmnpqq9eregqunrsbppj_mjj...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#637664: Re: Bug#637664: pu: package tzdata/2011h-0squeeze1
On 09/17/2011 07:57 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 16:40 +0200, Youssef Eldakar wrote: > On 01/-10/-28163 09:59 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 17:23 +0400, Eugene Barbashin wrote: [Russian law changes on October 30th] > > For the record, after some discussion with the maintainers on IRC and as > > the next point releases for both stable and oldstable are due to occur > > before mid-October, we've decided not to push an update earlier. There > > may be an update to either package before the point release in order to > > incorporate any further changes. > > Well, in Egypt, as of the last Friday of April 2011, a Squeeze > installation has incorrect time. I believe pushing an update is worth > reconsidering. If it's broken for more than four months now, why has nobody mentioned the issue before? I myself was using Ubuntu - which had the updated tzdata package - and was recently considering switching a group of hosts to Debian when I ran into the issue. -- Youssef Eldakar Bibliotheca Alexandrina -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e759347.60...@bibalex.org
