Bug#610948: unblock: ghostscript/8.71~dfsg2-8
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi, libgs8 in squeeze requires files from /usr/share/ghostscript/8.71 but does not declare a corresponding dependency on ghostscript. Worse, it could make the transition to libgs9 in wheezy difficult because later versions of ghostscript do not satisfy that dependency. (Bug#485621) The straightforward fix is to move those files from the ghostscript package to libgs8, which Jonas implemented. Please unblock it if it looks sane. I've tested that the package at installs and behaves as advetised in various scenarios but haven't reviewed the diff (attached) yet. The updated libgs8 seems to work well with evince. In the worst case a user can install ghostscript on top to return to the old minimal supported configuration. unblock ghostscript/8.71~dfsg2-8 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110124102602.GA10780@burratino
Re: Bug#609762: amavisd-milter: Init script changes owner of current directory to 'amavis'
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:57:37AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:04:14 +0100, Harald Jenny wrote: > > > Dear Gabor Kiss, > > > > thanks for the information, will test it myself and then release a new > > version. > > And thanks for your good bug report. > > > Can this be fixed ASAP please? > > Cheers, > Julien Dear Julien Cristau and release team, as http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2011/01/msg00111.html and http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2011/01/msg00498.html have yet been unanswered I guess that there won't be a fix for http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=527862 available in Debian Squeeze which makes amavisd-milter not ready for release. So could you please remove this package from Debian testing (which will also make this bug less time-critical to be solved.) Thanks for your help and kind regards Harald Jenny -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110124110558.ga4...@harald-has.a-little-linux-box.at
Re: Bug#609762: amavisd-milter: Init script changes owner of current directory to 'amavis'
Harald Jenny schrieb am Montag, den 24. Januar 2011: > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:57:37AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:04:14 +0100, Harald Jenny wrote: > > > > > Dear Gabor Kiss, > > > > > > thanks for the information, will test it myself and then release a new > > > version. > > > And thanks for your good bug report. > > > > > Can this be fixed ASAP please? > Dear Julien Cristau and release team, > > as http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2011/01/msg00111.html and > http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2011/01/msg00498.html have yet been > unanswered I guess that there won't be a fix for > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=527862 available in Debian > Squeeze which makes amavisd-milter not ready for release. So could you please > remove this package from Debian testing (which will also make this bug less > time-critical to be solved.) Removing is bad bad idea as it leaves amavis user without a working milter. Alex -- Alexander Wirt, formo...@formorer.de CC99 2DDD D39E 75B0 B0AA B25C D35B BC99 BC7D 020A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110124113224.ga2...@hawking.credativ.lan
Bug#610948: unblock: ghostscript/8.71~dfsg2-8
Oh my, I see now that the git branch I based my work on, even if created by Michael Gilbert, do not match the final packaging actually released by him :-( I will double-check if anything but naming of patch and changelog entry is different, and get back to you. - Jonas diff -Nru ghostscript-8.71~dfsg2/debian/changelog ghostscript-8.71~dfsg2/debian/changelog --- ghostscript-8.71~dfsg2/debian/changelog 2010-12-26 16:28:14.0 -0600 +++ ghostscript-8.71~dfsg2/debian/changelog 2011-01-23 09:27:19.0 -0600 @@ -1,11 +1,28 @@ -ghostscript (8.71~dfsg2-6.1) unstable; urgency=medium +ghostscript (8.71~dfsg2-8) unstable; urgency=low - * Non-maintainer upload. - * Fix various aspects of CVE-2010-2055: -- Honor -P- command-line option (closes: #584653). -- Set SEARCH_HERE_FIRST=0 by default (closes: #584663). + * Update VCS hints to track squeeze-targeted branch. + * Sync control.in with control: ++ Add Michael Gilbert as uploader. ++ Newline-delimit uploaders. + * Fix install arch-independent files in library package: they are +needed by library calls (not only by executables): ++ Install /usr/share/ghostscript/* into libgs8. ++ Install empty dir var/lib/ghostscript/CMap into libgs8 (as well as + into ghostscript where install scripts depend on it) as it is used + by symlink. ++ Have libgs8 break and replace older ghostscript. +Closes: bug#485621, thanks to Tom Parker and others. - -- Michael Gilbert Thu, 09 Dec 2010 21:40:17 -0500 + -- Jonas Smedegaard Sun, 23 Jan 2011 16:12:44 +0100 + +ghostscript (8.71~dfsg2-7) unstable; urgency=low + + * Add myself as an uploader. + * Fix various aspects of cve-2010-2055: +- Honor -P- command-line argument (closes: #584653). +- Set SEARCH_HERE_FIRST by default (closes: #584663). + + -- Michael Gilbert Sun, 12 Dec 2010 14:40:18 -0500 -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug#610461: trac-mercurial bug
On Sat, January 22, 2011 23:36, Christoph Egger wrote: > Hi! > > Jürgen A. Erhard writes: >> This is from a hgwebdir install (dev.jaerhard.com). And it appears >> it's "fixed" when the repo has owner www-data:www-data. The repo has >> 644 perms throughout (+x for directories). So, it appears it needs >> write permissions. Strange. [...] >> I applied the patch in @9943 (referenced in >> http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/9482) and that fixes it. > > Yeah I see how adding that will fix the crash at hand.I could just > apply this -- does just adding tyhe **opts also fix your problem? That > would just make these functions accept a bit nore different input and > won't break anything working if I see that correctly so I could build a > package with that patch attached if the release team prefers as I'm not > sure we'll find the real problem before release. Adding the **opts parameter does indeed look like it would resolve the crash. I'm not familiar enough with trac to know if the other parts of the referenced changeset are at all relevant, but the fact that the permissions change "fixes" the issue (presumably by avoiding the call to write_err() which fails) does suggest that they're not. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/b51f6f71ecbf7da0688a5b6a58f34c92.squir...@adsl.funky-badger.org
Bug#610970: unblock: dnssec-tools/1.7-3
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Please unblock package dnssec-tools The 1.7-3 introduces fix to a bug which makes the signer script always to fail (on certain condition) due reverted logical operator in the patched version (Bug #610369). The 1.7-3 revamped the patch, so it fixes the logical operators (and make the perl code more readable by using the ifed blocks instead just using 'or's). Here's the diffstat from my debian packaging git: $ git diff a32993afe7..29bc8fd3867 | diffstat 588821_check_for_errors.patch | 120 ++ 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-) The reported has confirmed that 1.7-3 fixes his problem. unblock dnssec-tools/1.7-3 - -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers natty-updates APT policy: (500, 'natty-updates'), (500, 'natty-security'), (500, 'natty-backports'), (500, 'natty') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.37-12-generic (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=cs_CZ.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk09i/gACgkQ9OZqfMIN8nNOBwCfdFm3knSso+Y2r7uzaQH20V4G zOgAoIPDOGVDK44Izy9tID/IP5s7PtMC =0dox -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110124142603.31446.14125.reportbug@localhost6
Bug#608744: unblock: mercurial-server/1.1-1
2011/1/24 Neil McGovern : > By the looks of things, Mehdi has already replied to your bug saying > that we can't accept the package at this stage. Yes, I know. But I thought that it could also be a good candidate for a "second thought" as it has been for other packages too. I mean, the package is in a good shape and we use it in production. > Apologies for the disappointment. My personal opinion is that the release policy should include allowing any leaf package back if there are no RC critical bugs. Maybe this will be changed for the next release, it is up to you (by you I mean the release team)! Thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktim-kimixqbia2+mgf10zko0t9hj2mypxs3km...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#610986: unblock: gnome-screensaver/2.30.0-3
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Hi, please unblock gnome-screensaver to disable a feature that doesn’t work, and tricks people into thinking the user has seen a message while he does not. gnome-screensaver (2.30.0-3) unstable; urgency=low * Disable libnotify support, the function simply doesn’t work at all. Closes: #606830. Thanks, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “If you behave this way because you are blackmailed by someone, `-[…] I will see what I can do for you.” -- Jörg Schilling signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#608744: unblock: mercurial-server/1.1-1
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 02:58:41PM +0200, Teodor MICU wrote: > 2011/1/3 Mehdi Dogguy : > > On 01/03/2011 11:31 AM, Teodor wrote: > >> > >> Please unblock package mercurial-server. The two RC bugs for this > >> package were fixed so it should get back for inclussion in Debian 6.0 > >> (squeeze). > >> > > > > I think it's too late to get it back in Squeeze. > > I guess this would be the last chance to have mercurial-server in > Debian 6.0. It is 26 days old [1] since the RC bugs were fixed and no > more issues reported. Please accept it. > Hi Teodor, By the looks of things, Mehdi has already replied to your bug saying that we can't accept the package at this stage. Apologies for the disappointment. Neil -- ETOOMUCHSPANISHTOOFAST -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110124164532.gl7...@halon.org.uk
Re: Bug#610240: gnumed-client/stable does not properly install translations
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 21:01:56 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi release team, > > I hope you will not be bored by the trouble which is caused by the > GNUmed package but the recent security uploads contained a regression > which had the effect that the .mo files are not installed in the package > and thus the users do not profit from existing translations. While bug > #610240 is not really serious it would be a shame if we could not fix > this issue which was introduced when trying to fix a security issue > (namely #605159). I attached a quite simple debdiff against the last > upload to Squeeze. > > Please tell me whether I should upload. > I think this can wait until post release, and get fixed in 6.0.1 if you want. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Seeking advice regarding an update for geda-gaf package
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 18:29:56 +0200, أحمد المحمودي wrote: > Hello, > > There is a upstream patch for geda-gaf packaged that fixes an arbitrary > code execution issue: > > http://git.gpleda.org/?p=gaf.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=16b3d32fcf8458389a491aed9437be835131b4b9 > here is the bug report: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/geda-gaf/+bug/700194 > > So, if I apply that patch, would that grant a freeze exception ? > If the upload happens very, very soon, then probably. > Also, is it alright to also have those changes accepted in a freeze > exception: > > 1) Bumping Standards-Version to 3.9.1 > 2) Changed versioned Conflicts to Breaks. (Please see the this diff: > > http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-electronics/geda-gaf.git;a=commitdiff;h=40f6c660335f5ed1b0f6d8a48b9b379e16131f80 > ) > No. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#610989: unblock: gnome-panel/2.30.2-3
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Hi, please unblock gnome-panel for a pair of minor adjustments. gnome-panel (2.30.2-3) unstable; urgency=low * Only recommend menu-xdg. * 10_bookmarks_limit.patch: new patch. Limit the number of bookmarks before putting them in a submenu to 8 instead of 5. Closes: #610558. Thanks, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “If you behave this way because you are blackmailed by someone, `-[…] I will see what I can do for you.” -- Jörg Schilling signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
aegis RC bugs
Hi, these two bugs are no regressions from Lenny and should therefore be deferred to 6.0.1, IMHO: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610984 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610985 Cheers, Stefan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/alpine.deb.1.10.1101241801130.26...@eru.sfritsch.de
Bug#609805: unblock: popularity-contest/1.50
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 09:27:52AM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote: > Quoting Mehdi Dogguy (me...@debian.org): > > > Do you intend to fix that in unstable? Did you submit a bug so that it's > > kept under someone's radar? > > > > In any case, like what jcristau said… so closing this bugreport. > > Rah, apologies for not doing so... I just reported #610840 and > committed the fix in popcon's SVN. > > Bill, could you upload? Done, but I will let you deal with the release team if need be. Cheers, -- Bill. Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110124171733.GE8863@yellowpig
Re: aegis RC bugs
user release.debian@packages.debian.org tag 610984 + squeeze-ignore usertag 610984 + squeeze-can-defer tag 610985 + squeeze-ignore usertag 610985 + squeeze-can-defer thanks On Mon, January 24, 2011 17:04, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > these two bugs are no regressions from Lenny and should therefore be > deferred to 6.0.1, IMHO: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610984 > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610985 Ack; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/39752a48cd270ee8e17b1e194fc56188.squir...@adsl.funky-badger.org
Re: Bug#610968: lenny->squeeze: kde metapackages get removed by "apt-get install udev"
clone 610968 -1 reassign -1 dpkg thanks Hi peoples. This upgrade (and similar ones) is kind of having issues. After debugging it with David Kalnischkies and Julien Cristau, we found out that apt is having quite some issues with the Breaks: konqueror in dpkg. Basically, udev wanst a new util-linux, which wants a new dpkg, which breaks konqueror. Apt's best solution here seems to be a half-ass upgrade of varous KDE related things, and removing the rest. After removing the Breaks: konqueror in dpkg, the result of apt-get install udev looks kind of sane. apt-get -o Debug::pkgProblemResolver=1 install udev Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Starting Starting 2 Investigating libc6-dev Package libc6-dev has broken dep on libc-dev-bin Considering libc-dev-bin 1 as a solution to libc6-dev 45 Re-Instated libc-dev-bin Re-Instated gcc-4.4-base Re-Instated libstdc++6 Re-Instated binutils Re-Instated libc6-dev Done The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required: libglib1.2ldbl libio-compress-zlib-perl libcompress-raw-zlib-perl gs-esp libio-compress-base-perl xscreensaver libsysfs-dev libdirectfb-extra libdirectfb-dev locate uswsusp libmpeg3-dev xli libsplashy1 libdigest-sha1-perl Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them. The following extra packages will be installed: binutils dpkg dpkg-dev gcc-4.4-base libalgorithm-diff-perl libalgorithm-diff-xs-perl libalgorithm-merge-perl libc-bin libc-dev-bin libc6 libc6-dev libc6-i686 libdpkg-perl libgphoto2-2 libgphoto2-port0 libltdl7 liblzma2 libsane libstdc++6 libudev0 libv4l-0 linux-image-2.6-686 locales util-linux util-linux-locales xz-utils Suggested packages: binutils-doc debian-keyring glibc-doc gphoto2 gtkam hpoj xz-lzma The following NEW packages will be installed gcc-4.4-base libalgorithm-diff-perl libalgorithm-diff-xs-perl libalgorithm-merge-perl libc-bin libc-dev-bin libdpkg-perl libltdl7 liblzma2 libudev0 libv4l-0 xz-utils The following packages will be upgraded: binutils dpkg dpkg-dev libc6 libc6-dev libc6-i686 libgphoto2-2 libgphoto2-port0 libsane libstdc++6 linux-image-2.6-686 locales udev util-linux util-linux-locales 15 upgraded, 12 newly installed, 0 to remove and 640 not upgraded. Need to get 33.1MB of archives. After this operation, 18.8MB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? So please, roll a dpkg without that breaks. This is ack'ed by Julien on irc. The worst case is that info browsing with konqueror is broken for people with partial upgrades. The alternative is a quite hosed upgrade. The former is preferred. /Sune On Monday 24 January 2011 15:18:36 Stuart Prescott wrote: > Package: upgrade-reports > Severity: normal > > Upgrading a kde installation from lenny->squeeze specifically to test the > latest set of kde metapackages that were added back to the archive to make > this upgrade easier, I find that when following the release notes, kde > still ends up being ripped out. > > The upgrade procedure was rigorously "by the book". The step where this > fails is "apt-get install udev" as recommended in §4.4.5. > > The dpkg status file and output of "apt-get install udev" are attached. > > apt-get dist-upgrade seems to work fine with a fairly minimal amount of > breakage so that is how I proceeded, assuming that udev would behave itself > for as long as necessary to complete the upgrade. > > enjoy... > Stuart -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201101241823.31678.s...@debian.org
Re: please migrate mhonarc package to testing
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 10:45:58AM -0800, Jeff Breidenbach wrote: > On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Jeff Breidenbach wrote: > >> diffstat: 61 files changed, 1502 insertions(+), 657 deletions(-) > >> Is all of that necessary to fix the security issues? > > > > No. > > > > However, I do not have the ability to isolate (and especially validate) > > just the security fixes. Additionally, it is conservative release that > > should not break any existing installations. Therefore my formal opinion > > as package maintainer is the entire 2.6.18 release should ship as the > > security update. Here are links to the release notes so you can decide for > > yourself. > > Hi Jeff, Apologies for the delay in getting back to you. That diffstat is cerainly much larger than can be accepted at this stage in the release. Have you contacted the security team about these? It's possible to look at getting an update in after the release which fixes these specific issues. Thanks, Neil -- A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ; the.earth.li A40F862E -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110124165026.gm7...@halon.org.uk
Bug#610996: unblock: dansguardian/2.10.1.1-3
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package dansguardian dansguardian fails to restart due to a bug in the init script (#605934). Please unblock the unstable version which has a minimal fix for this. Thanks, 17:28 hi, thanks for uploading dansguardian; now it's built everywhere, do you want to file the unblock bug or shall I? 17:43 go ahead :) 17:44 ok 17:44 thanks again unblock dansguardian/2.10.1.1-3 -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110124174710.14170.84784.report...@vcs.ynic.york.ac.uk
Bug#610996: marked as done (unblock: dansguardian/2.10.1.1-3)
Your message dated Mon, 24 Jan 2011 18:17:06 - with message-id <646dd34fb0bcb4c9761874b4f5101cfd.squir...@adsl.funky-badger.org> and subject line Re: Bug#610996: unblock: dansguardian/2.10.1.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #610996, regarding unblock: dansguardian/2.10.1.1-3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 610996: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610996 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package dansguardian dansguardian fails to restart due to a bug in the init script (#605934). Please unblock the unstable version which has a minimal fix for this. Thanks, 17:28 hi, thanks for uploading dansguardian; now it's built everywhere, do you want to file the unblock bug or shall I? 17:43 go ahead :) 17:44 ok 17:44 thanks again unblock dansguardian/2.10.1.1-3 -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Mon, January 24, 2011 17:47, Mark Hymers wrote: > Please unblock package dansguardian > > dansguardian fails to restart due to a bug in the init script (#605934). > Please unblock the unstable version which has a minimal fix for this. Already done: $ grep-excuses dansguardian dansguardian (2.10.1.1-2 to 2.10.1.1-3) Maintainer: Alexander Wirt Too young, only 4 of 5 days old Ignoring block request by freeze, due to unblock request by adsb Overriding age needed from 10 days to 5 by adsb Not considered :) Regards, Adam --- End Message ---
Bug#609794: marked as done (unblock: xen/4.0.1-2)
Your message dated Mon, 24 Jan 2011 19:43:35 +0100 with message-id <20110124184335.gp30...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr> and subject line Re: Bug#609794: unblock: xen/4.0.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #609794, regarding unblock: xen/4.0.1-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 609794: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609794 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock xen. It includes at least one security fix, some race and memory leak fixes and boot time crash fixes. Also it supports current grub 2 config files in pygrub. unblock xen/4.0.1-2 -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 15:54:07 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > > Please unblock xen. It includes at least one security fix, some race and > memory leak fixes and boot time crash fixes. Also it supports current > grub 2 config files in pygrub. > That's bigger than we'd like right now... Unblocked. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature --- End Message ---
Re: Bug#610240: gnumed-client/stable does not properly install translations
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 06:10:02PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > I hope you will not be bored by the trouble which is caused by the > > GNUmed package but the recent security uploads contained a regression > > which had the effect that the .mo files are not installed in the package > > and thus the users do not profit from existing translations. While bug > > #610240 is not really serious it would be a shame if we could not fix > > this issue which was introduced when trying to fix a security issue > > (namely #605159). I attached a quite simple debdiff against the last > > upload to Squeeze. > > > > Please tell me whether I should upload. > > > I think this can wait until post release, and get fixed in 6.0.1 if you > want. I was afraid of this answer but I think I need to accept this. Can you please tell me, what exactly I have to do to make sure it will show up in 6.0.1. Kind regards and thanks for your hard work anyway Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110124191017.gd25...@an3as.eu
Bug#611005: unblock: geda-gaf/1.6.1-5
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package geda-gaf
* Added disable_gnetlist-arg.diff patch, to fix arbitrary code execution.
(LP: #700194)
Debdiff against 1.6.1-4 is attached.
unblock geda-gaf/1.6.1-5
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers maverick-updates
APT policy: (500, 'maverick-updates'), (500, 'maverick-security'), (500,
'maverick-proposed'), (500, 'maverick-backports'), (500, 'maverick')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.35-25-generic (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 15bc1fb..4aa42e8 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+geda-gaf (1:1.6.1-5) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Added disable_gnetlist-arg.diff patch, to fix arbitrary code execution.
+(LP: #700194)
+
+ -- أحمد المحمودي (Ahmed El-Mahmoudy) Mon, 24 Jan 2011 19:58:01 +0200
+
geda-gaf (1:1.6.1-4) unstable; urgency=low
* Added fix_string_exceptions.diff patch to fix string exceptions in
diff --git a/debian/patches/disable_gnetlist-arg.diff b/debian/patches/disable_gnetlist-arg.diff
new file mode 100644
index 000..452aad9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/patches/disable_gnetlist-arg.diff
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+Description: gsch2pcb: Don't allow `gnetlist-arg' in project file.
+Origin: http://git.gpleda.org/?p=gaf.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=16b3d32fcf8458389a491aed9437be835131b4b9
+Author: Peter TB Brett
+Bug-Ubuntu: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/geda-gaf/+bug/700194
+
+--- a/utils/src/gsch2pcb.c
b/utils/src/gsch2pcb.c
+@@ -1253,9 +1253,6 @@
+ else if (!strcmp(config, "gnetlist"))
+ extra_gnetlist_list =
+ g_list_append(extra_gnetlist_list, g_strdup(arg));
+- else if (!strcmp(config, "gnetlist-arg"))
+- extra_gnetlist_arg_list =
+-g_list_append(extra_gnetlist_arg_list, g_strdup(arg));
+ else if (!strcmp(config, "empty-footprint"))
+ empty_footprint_name = g_strdup(arg);
+ else
+@@ -1370,10 +1367,10 @@
+ " --gnetlist backendA convenience run of extra gnetlist -g commands.\n"
+ " Example: gnetlist partslist3\n"
+ " Creates: myproject.partslist3\n"
+-" --gnetlist-arg argAllows additional arguments to be passed to gnetlist.\n"
+ " --empty-footprint name See the project.sample file.\n"
+ "\n"
+ "options (not recognized in a project file):\n"
++" --gnetlist-arg argAllows additional arguments to be passed to gnetlist.\n"
+ " --fix-elementsIf a schematic component footprint is not equal\n"
+ " to its PCB element Description, update the\n"
+ " Description instead of replacing the element.\n"
+@@ -1432,6 +1429,14 @@
+ fix_elements = TRUE;
+ continue;
+ }
++ else if (!strcmp(opt, "gnetlist-arg"))
++{
++extra_gnetlist_arg_list =
++g_list_append(extra_gnetlist_arg_list,
++g_strdup(arg));
++i++;
++continue;
++}
+ else if (!strcmp(opt, "help") || !strcmp(opt, "h"))
+ usage();
+ else if ( i < argc
diff --git a/debian/patches/series b/debian/patches/series
index 561c79a..0e1a01a 100644
--- a/debian/patches/series
+++ b/debian/patches/series
@@ -2,3 +2,4 @@ desktop.diff
manpage_typos.diff
sch2eaglepos_bashism.diff
fix_string_exceptions.diff
+disable_gnetlist-arg.diff
Bug#611009: unblock: libgksu/2.0.13~pre1-4
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Hi, please unblock libgksu for a translation update. libgksu (2.0.13~pre1-4) unstable; urgency=low * ru.po: updated Russian translation by Alexander Sashanov. Closes: #609130, #609141. Thanks, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “If you behave this way because you are blackmailed by someone, `-[…] I will see what I can do for you.” -- Jörg Schilling signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#611010: unblock: rhythmbox/0.12.8-3
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Hi, please unblock rhythmbox to fix a crasher. rhythmbox (0.12.8-3) unstable; urgency=low * Drop type-handling usage. Closes: #587870. * Bump standards version accordingly. * 04_mtp_crash.patch: stolen upstream. Fix a crasher in MTP player management. Thanks, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “If you behave this way because you are blackmailed by someone, `-[…] I will see what I can do for you.” -- Jörg Schilling signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Bug#610714: NMU for http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610714? (auctex)
Faheem Mitha wrote: >>> I think that getting the fix into a point release ie. 6.1 as a >>> backport to 11.85 would be reasonable. >> >> I agree - delaying squeeze because of that would be ridiculous. > > Right. So, what's the next step? Wait for the auctex maintainer? > Proceed with a unstable NMU? Something else? The usual thing with auctex would be to prepare an NMU, test it thoroughly, get some feedback and a better package; then upload it to the 10-days delayed queue. The next day, Davide (the so-called maintainer) will show up and say he'll fix it himself soon. About a day before your upload would enter unstable, he'll upload his version with a completely different approach to fixing things. Which might be better or even miss things, but will never be discussed. Or something like this. Still, if you don't prepare an NMU, chances are nothing's going to happen until, err, what's the successor of squeeze going to be called? Regards, Frank -- Dr. Frank Küster VCD Miltenberg, ADFC Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg Debian Developer (TeXLive) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/877hdu9h88@alhambra.kuesterei.ch
Bug#610292: unblock: iceowl/1.0~b1+dfsg2-1
Hi, Apologies for the delay in getting back to you. On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 09:28 +0100, Guido Günther wrote: > I've moved iceowl in squeeze from the comm-zentral 3.0.0 codebase (aka > sunbird 1.0b1) to comm-zentral 3.0.11 (thunderbird 3.0.11). This fixes > quiet some security related issues in the mozilla codebase. With this > change made we can security support iceowl by "simply" using the icedove > tarball as a base since both packages are built from the same > comm-central repository. I tried to keep the packaging changes to a > minimum. Any chance we can push this into squeeze: The main problem I'm having with looking at this is the size of the diff that gets introduced as a result. Even after ignoring the test suite, the embedded copy of sqlite3 and the autoconf patches, I'm still left with 2061 files changed, 65055 insertions(+), 96419 deletions(-) which isn't particularly fun. :-/ > iceowl (1.0~b1+dfsg2-1) unstable; urgency=low > > * [d96a5b0] New upstream version based on icedove 3.0.11 this fixes the > following security bugs: [chomp] How many of those bugs actually affect the version of the package in Squeeze, rather than being introduced as part of the upstream tarball switch? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1295901818.2202.475.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: Bug#610714: NMU for http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610714? (auctex)
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011, Frank Küster wrote: Faheem Mitha wrote: I think that getting the fix into a point release ie. 6.1 as a backport to 11.85 would be reasonable. I agree - delaying squeeze because of that would be ridiculous. Right. So, what's the next step? Wait for the auctex maintainer? Proceed with a unstable NMU? Something else? The usual thing with auctex would be to prepare an NMU, test it thoroughly, get some feedback and a better package; then upload it to the 10-days delayed queue. The next day, Davide (the so-called maintainer) will show up and say he'll fix it himself soon. About a day before your upload would enter unstable, he'll upload his version with a completely different approach to fixing things. Which might be better or even miss things, but will never be discussed. Or something like this. Still, if you don't prepare an NMU, chances are nothing's going to happen until, err, what's the successor of squeeze going to be called? Heh. Well, that does sound like lots of fun. Unfortunately, as I wrote to Julian Gilbey, I still seem to have breakage, even with this patch. If I set TeX PDF mode to true, ie. '(TeX-PDF-mode t) to your .emacs in custom-set-variables (usually set via customize), preview breaks completely. With eg. C-c C-p C-d it seems to create one big blank embedded png (or whatever) which covers the document entirely, with the result that the document disappears. Yay. With it off (ie regular latex mode), it works, but throws errors some of the time. I guess I need to do more testing. Can you (or anyone else) reproduce any of this? Again, I'm currently using 11.86 + that cvs patch. My debs are publicly accessible (see earlier mesasage) in case anyone wants to test. I'm wondering if I should be CCing an auctex list with this stuff, and if so, which one? General? Bugs? Also, I've got a bunch of lists CCed. Anyone want me to take them off? Frank, can I leave debian-tex-ma...@lists.debian.org CCed? Regards, Faheem
Bug#611005: marked as done (unblock: geda-gaf/1.6.1-5)
Your message dated Mon, 24 Jan 2011 22:46:52 +0100
with message-id <20110124214652.gq30...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#611005: unblock: geda-gaf/1.6.1-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #611005,
regarding unblock: geda-gaf/1.6.1-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
611005: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611005
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package geda-gaf
* Added disable_gnetlist-arg.diff patch, to fix arbitrary code execution.
(LP: #700194)
Debdiff against 1.6.1-4 is attached.
unblock geda-gaf/1.6.1-5
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers maverick-updates
APT policy: (500, 'maverick-updates'), (500, 'maverick-security'), (500,
'maverick-proposed'), (500, 'maverick-backports'), (500, 'maverick')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.35-25-generic (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 15bc1fb..4aa42e8 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+geda-gaf (1:1.6.1-5) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Added disable_gnetlist-arg.diff patch, to fix arbitrary code execution.
+(LP: #700194)
+
+ -- أحمد المحمودي (Ahmed El-Mahmoudy) Mon, 24 Jan 2011 19:58:01 +0200
+
geda-gaf (1:1.6.1-4) unstable; urgency=low
* Added fix_string_exceptions.diff patch to fix string exceptions in
diff --git a/debian/patches/disable_gnetlist-arg.diff b/debian/patches/disable_gnetlist-arg.diff
new file mode 100644
index 000..452aad9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/patches/disable_gnetlist-arg.diff
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+Description: gsch2pcb: Don't allow `gnetlist-arg' in project file.
+Origin: http://git.gpleda.org/?p=gaf.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=16b3d32fcf8458389a491aed9437be835131b4b9
+Author: Peter TB Brett
+Bug-Ubuntu: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/geda-gaf/+bug/700194
+
+--- a/utils/src/gsch2pcb.c
b/utils/src/gsch2pcb.c
+@@ -1253,9 +1253,6 @@
+ else if (!strcmp(config, "gnetlist"))
+ extra_gnetlist_list =
+ g_list_append(extra_gnetlist_list, g_strdup(arg));
+- else if (!strcmp(config, "gnetlist-arg"))
+- extra_gnetlist_arg_list =
+-g_list_append(extra_gnetlist_arg_list, g_strdup(arg));
+ else if (!strcmp(config, "empty-footprint"))
+ empty_footprint_name = g_strdup(arg);
+ else
+@@ -1370,10 +1367,10 @@
+ " --gnetlist backendA convenience run of extra gnetlist -g commands.\n"
+ " Example: gnetlist partslist3\n"
+ " Creates: myproject.partslist3\n"
+-" --gnetlist-arg argAllows additional arguments to be passed to gnetlist.\n"
+ " --empty-footprint name See the project.sample file.\n"
+ "\n"
+ "options (not recognized in a project file):\n"
++" --gnetlist-arg argAllows additional arguments to be passed to gnetlist.\n"
+ " --fix-elementsIf a schematic component footprint is not equal\n"
+ " to its PCB element Description, update the\n"
+ " Description instead of replacing the element.\n"
+@@ -1432,6 +1429,14 @@
+ fix_elements = TRUE;
+ continue;
+ }
++ else if (!strcmp(opt, "gnetlist-arg"))
++{
++extra_gnetlist_arg_list =
++g_list_append(extra_gnetlist_arg_list,
++g_strdup(arg));
++i++;
++continue;
++}
+ else if (!strcmp(opt, "help") || !strcmp(opt, "h"))
+ usage();
+ else if ( i < argc
diff --git a/debian/patches/series b/debian/patches/series
index 561c79a..0e1a01a 100644
--- a/debian/patches/series
+++ b/debian/patches/series
@@ -2,3 +2,4 @@ desktop.diff
manpage_typos.diff
sch2eaglepos_bashism.diff
fix_string_exceptions.diff
+disable_gnetlist-arg.diff
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 21:47:01 +0200, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
>
> Please unblock package geda-gaf
>
Done, thanks.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
Re: Bug#610461: trac-mercurial bug
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 13:45 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sat, January 22, 2011 23:36, Christoph Egger wrote: > > Yeah I see how adding that will fix the crash at hand.I could just > > apply this -- does just adding tyhe **opts also fix your problem? That > > would just make these functions accept a bit nore different input and > > won't break anything working if I see that correctly so I could build a > > package with that patch attached if the release team prefers as I'm not > > sure we'll find the real problem before release. > > Adding the **opts parameter does indeed look like it would resolve the > crash. I'm not familiar enough with trac to know if the other parts of > the referenced changeset are at all relevant, but the fact that the > permissions change "fixes" the issue (presumably by avoiding the call to > write_err() which fails) does suggest that they're not. 0.11.0.7+svnr8365-3 unblocked and aged; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1295905996.2202.778.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: permission to upload bip/0.8.2-1squeeze3 to testing proposed updates
On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 10:59 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 01:59:18 +0100, Pierre-Louis Bonicoli wrote: > > > Hi ! > > > > I am the upstream and sponsored Debian maintainer of Bip. > > > > A user of bip reported a bug which can be used to do a remote DOS of > > bip. Bug is present in bip/0.8.2-1squeeze2. > > > > debdiff (bip/0.8.2-1squeeze2 and bip/0.8.2-1squeeze3 source packages) > > containing the fix is attached. > > > Please go ahead. Any news on that? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1295906081.2202.788.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: Your mon / s-p-u upload
Hi Team,
Sorry for taking s long
On 11/01/2010 10:57 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Many apologies for letting this keep slipping down my to-do list.
>
> On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 14:24 +0200, Dario Minnucci wrote:
>> Hi again,
>>
>> On 08/25/2010 08:53 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2010-07-18 at 17:33 +0200, Dario Minnucci wrote:
> [...]
+case "$1" in
+ start)
+ if [ -f $PIDFILE ] ; then
+ echo "$NAME daemon is already running."
+ else
+ start_deamon
+ fi
>>>
>>> The short-circuit case should be removed here; the existence of the
>>> pidfile does not imply that the daemon is (still) running and your
>>> start-stop-daemon call in start_daemon() already handles exiting
>>> successfully if the daemon is in fact running.
>>>
>> I've tried what you suggest here but if I don't check for the
>> existence of the PID file and the
>> daemon is already running, starting it again fails.
>>
>> root@host:~# /etc/init.d/mon start ; echo $?
>> Starting monitor daemon: 1
>
> A little debugging this evening suggests that this is a side-effect of
> mon being a perl script.
>
> On the first call to the init script, s-s-d checks that the PID file
> does not exist, and that there are no processes called "/usr/sbin/mon"
> running and duly starts one. On the second time around, it finds the
> PID file and continues to check whether any instances of /usr/sbin/mon
> exist; they don't, as what's actually running is
> "/usr/bin/perl /usr/sbin/mon ...". So it tries starting a second mon
> instance, which itself "exit 1"s as it's unable to bind to the port,
> which is occupied by the first instance.
>
> Changing --exec to --startas avoids this problem, although it doesn't
> rule out the possibility that the daemon has crashed and another process
> is then using the PID mentioned in the PID file. Then again,
> stop_daemon() isn't using --exec anyway, so the script is already happy
> to stop whatever process happens to be on that PID.
>
> Regards,
>
> Adam
>
Debdiff attached.
I've modified the init script to use --startas and seems it works as expected.
Please, let me know if is possible to upload this s-p-u.
Regards,
--
Dario Minnucci
Phone: +34 902021030 | Fax: +34 902024417
Key fingerprint = BAA1 7AAF B21D 6567 D457 D67D A82F BB83 F3D5 7033
diff -u mon-0.99.2/debian/mon.init.d mon-0.99.2/debian/mon.init.d
--- mon-0.99.2/debian/mon.init.d
+++ mon-0.99.2/debian/mon.init.d
@@ -44,16 +44,30 @@
set -e
-case "$1" in
- start)
+
+function start_deamon {
echo -n "Starting $DESC: "
- start-stop-daemon --start --quiet --pidfile $PIDFILE --chuid $USER
--group $GROUP --exec $DAEMON -- $DAEMON_OPTS
+ start-stop-daemon --start --oknodo --pidfile $PIDFILE --chuid $USER
--group $GROUP --startas $DAEMON -- $DAEMON_OPTS
echo "$NAME."
- ;;
- stop)
+}
+function stop_daemon {
echo -n "Stopping $DESC: "
- start-stop-daemon --stop --quiet --pidfile $PIDFILE
+ start-stop-daemon --stop --oknodo --pidfile $PIDFILE
echo "$NAME."
+}
+
+
+
+case "$1" in
+ start)
+ if [ -f $PIDFILE ] ; then
+ echo "$NAME daemon is already running."
+ else
+ start_deamon
+ fi
+ ;;
+ stop)
+ stop_daemon
;;
#reload)
#
@@ -75,16 +89,14 @@
# daemon isn't already running.
# check wether $DAEMON is running. If so, restart
start-stop-daemon --stop --test --quiet --pidfile \
- $PIDFILE --exec $DAEMON \
+ $PIDFILE --startas $DAEMON \
&& $0 restart \
|| exit 0
;;
restart)
-echo -n "Restarting $DESC: "
- start-stop-daemon --stop --quiet --pidfile $PIDFILE
- sleep 1
- start-stop-daemon --start --quiet --pidfile $PIDFILE --chuid $USER
--group $GROUP --exec $DAEMON -- $DAEMON_OPTS
- echo "$NAME."
+ stop_daemon
+ sleep 1
+ start_deamon
;;
*)
N=/etc/init.d/$NAME
diff -u mon-0.99.2/debian/changelog mon-0.99.2/debian/changelog
--- mon-0.99.2/debian/changelog
+++ mon-0.99.2/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+mon (0.99.2-13+lenny1) stable-proposed-updates; urgency=low
+
+ * debian/mon.init.d: Script fixes to return success when daemon
+is restarted but is already running. (Closes: #538133)
+
+ -- Dario Minnucci Sun, 18 Jul 2010 17:09:04 +0200
+
mon (0.99.2-13) unstable; urgency=low
* debian/control: Conforms with latest Standards Version 3.8.0
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: LibreOffice and openoffice.org-{hyphenation,thesaurus}-*
Hi, On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 02:35:44PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > OK, let's do hyphen-* and mythes-* then. I uploaded all "my" packages to experimental with it (source packages - hyphen - openoffice.org-dictionaries - openthesaurus Now got through NEW. (No transitional packages yet, though) Will file a transition tracking bug later. Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110124221626.ga30...@rene-engelhard.de
Re: Bug#610714: NMU for http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610714? (auctex)
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 02:32:31AM +0530, Faheem Mitha wrote: > Heh. Well, that does sound like lots of fun. Unfortunately, as I > wrote to Julian Gilbey, I still seem to have breakage, even with > this patch. If I set TeX PDF mode to true, ie. It seems that it was my TeX file which was broken. circ.tex works perfectly with the patched version. However, preview-latex breaks with hyperref. Julian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110124215039.gb26...@d-and-j.net
Bug#611028: unblock: openjdk-6/1.8.4-1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock openjdk-6/1.8.4-1, minor update, including a security fix. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d3dfdff.7060...@ubuntu.com
Bug#611050: ftp.debian.org: please force gnash acceptance in t-p-u
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hello, [CC'ing debian-release@l.d.o] according to RM [1], I'd like to upload gnash 0.8.8-5squeeze1 which has been rejected [2] from t-p-u. [...] swfdec-gnome_0.8.8-5squeeze1_amd64.deb: old version (0.8.8-7) in unstable <= new version (1:0.8.8-5squeeze1) targeted at testing-proposed-updates. swfdec-gnome_0.8.8-5squeeze1_amd64.deb: old version (0.8.8-8) in unstable <= new version (1:0.8.8-5squeeze1) targeted at testing-proposed-updates. swfdec-gnome_0.8.8-5squeeze1_amd64.deb: old version (0.8.9~git20101219-1) in experimental <= new version (1:0.8.8-5squeeze1) targeted at testing-proposed-updates. [...] I just uploaded 0.8.8-9 to unstable to fix swfdec-gnome version in unstable and partially fix reject reasons. Partially because dak considers even old versions like -7, -8 and versions in experimental and I don't know whether uploading -9 as I did is enough. When rmadison sees new epoched swfdec-gnome sid version, I'll try to reupload -5squeeze1 to t-p-u. Maybe I'll get a rejection again so if your intervention is necessary, could you please fix that? Many thanks Gabriele [1] http://bugs.debian.org/608350 [2] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-flash-devel/2011-January/001231.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110125031851.GA19829@phenomenon
Bug#611055: unblock: binutils/2.20.1-16
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception binutils (2.20.1-16) unstable; urgency=low * Add arm-linux-gnueabi to the multiarch targets, remove the old arm*-linux-gnu targets. Addresses #610745. This is a no-change upload for the binary binutils package, and only touches binutils-multiarch. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d3e6dbf.7040...@debian.org
Re: OpenJDK / default JDK for squeeze / issues on mips / open security issues for lenny
On 20.01.2011 08:06, tony mancill wrote: On 01/19/2011 10:36 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: * tony mancill: On 01/14/2011 11:46 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: * tony mancill: As per Section 5.8.5 of the Developer's Reference, I'd like to get confirmation from the Security Team that they are anticipating and approve of the upload of the new source version. (My apologies if this has already been covered; I joined the thread already in progress.) Would you please show us the debdiff to the version in squeeze, and the list of dependencies of the .deb file? Alternatively, please put the files on people.debian.org, so that we can have a look at them before the upload. Thanks for your support in this matter. Do you plane to switch to IcedTea 1.9 or a later version during the squeeze release? Because the debdiff is quite large (from 6b11 to 6b18), I've uploaded the build to people.debian.org. For that reason, I asked for a debdiff against the *squeeze* version. 8-) Whoops - sorry I missed that aspect of the request. What is the following change about? --- openjdk-6-6b18-1.8.3/Makefile.in +++ openjdk-6-6b18-1.8.3.orig/Makefile.in @@ -800,7 +800,6 @@ --enable-zero $(am__append_25) --disable-docs $(filter-out \ '--with-gcj-home=% '--with-ecj=% '--with-java=% \ '--with-javah=% '--with-rmic=% '--with-additional-vms=% \ - '--with-hotspot-build=% '--with-hotspot-src-zip=% \ '--with-openjdk '--with-openjdk=% , $(CONFIGURE_ARGS)) $(if \ $(findstring --with-openjdk-src-zip=, $(CONFIGURE_ARGS)),, \ --with-openjdk-src-zip=$(abs_top_builddir)/$(OPENJDK_SRC_ZIP)) \ @@ -811,7 +810,7 @@ BUILD_JAXWS=false ALT_JAXWS_DIST=$(ICEDTEA_BUILD_DIR)/jaxws/dist \ BUILD_CORBA=false ALT_CORBA_DIST=$(ICEDTEA_BUILD_DIR)/corba/dist \ BUILD_JDK=false \ + DISTRIBUTION_PATCHES='$(foreach p,$(DISTRIBUTION_PATCHES),$(if $(findstring cacao,$(p)),,$(p)))' - DISTRIBUTION_PATCHES='$(foreach p,$(DISTRIBUTION_PATCHES),$(if $(findstring cacao,$(p)),,$(subst -hs17,-original,$(p' This is present both relative to squeeze and to a direct rebuild for lenny (according to Matthias Klose's suggestion), so it seems that you applied it. I'll have to dig into the source of this change (or better, start over with the current squeeze package). The only patch that should be applied is the ca-certificates-java patch. So everyone's clear, I did this under the impression that what was needed for lenny was essentially a binary build of the current version in testing. AFAICT, your packages will introduce pulseaudio support and replace the browser plugin code (which might need updating the conflict with icedtea-gcjwebplugin). If you follow Matthias' suggestion (plus the ca-certificates-java patch), then you end up with something closer to the lenny version. Which approach carries less risk, in your opinion? Frankly, I'm not well-versed enough in the various issues to assert an opinion. Off the cuff, I'd say that staying as close to what's in lenny in terms of dependencies/conflicts is less risky (but that's admittedly an attempt at a common-sense answer). I'll do testing of the package (once I sort out what happened with Makefile.in) on a lenny desktop. please join the IcedTea project to better understand the changes in IcedTea/OpenJDK. Unfixed bugs in HotSpot are one main reason why people do suggest using sun-java6, so it doesn't make sense to keep these bugs. openjdk 6b18-1.8.4-1 was uploaded to unstable, and an unblock requested. The version fixes the ca-certificates-java issue for lenny too. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d3e6f39.20...@ubuntu.com
Re: please migrate mhonarc package to testing
> That diffstat is cerainly much larger than can be accepted at this stage > in the release. Have you contacted the security team about these? It's > possible to look at getting an update in after the release which fixes > these specific issues. I contacted the security team January 9th, no response. As I said, I do not think it is feasible to backport small security fixes due to difficulty in validation. Anyway, at this point I don't know what to do. Suggestions welcome. In the grand scheme of things, I'll try not to get too excited. The universe is predicted to end in less than 30 billion years anyway, no need to get hung up on some ephemeral details. -Jeff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTi=ihy4+harrjbwvoxad34h8x-tz_c26-g8cu...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#611059: unblock: live-manual/1:2.0.2-1
Package: release.debian.org live-manual (1:2.0.2-1) unstable; urgency=low [ Ben Armstrong ] * Fixing missing paren in Reporting bugs chapter. [ Carlo Stemberger ] * Proof-reading user_examples, Italian translation. * Conforming the style of user_example, Italian translation. * Fixing the fuzzy/zombie bug: the problem was the "§" character. * Unfuzzy live-manual.ssm.po, Italian translation. [ Ben Armstrong ] * Adding name tags to chapters to eliminate numeric filenames in HTML multipage output. * Removing 'under heavy construction' from index, as we are now done. * Updating languages for commit 7f75631. -- Daniel Baumann Tue, 25 Jan 2011 07:15:55 +0100 -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d3e7912.6030...@debian.org
Bug#611060: unblock: popularity-contest/1.51
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package popularity-contest It really fixes #610840 (correct pre-dependency on debconf and cdebconf to properly handle the existence of a Serbian (Latin) translation of debconf templates...this would break lenny->squeeze upgrades to my understanding). unblock popularity-contest/1.51 -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110125061149.11592.57304.report...@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org
