Bug#602686: unblock: chromium-browser/6.0.472.63~r59945-2
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Please unblock package chromium-browser chromium-browser (6.0.472.63~r59945-2) unstable; urgency=high * Added the missing changelog credit for the 5.0.375.29~r46008-1 revision. Obviously this was not a "stealing" as foolishly written by Fabien Tassin in a blog rant, but was a bad debian/changelog merge. * Backported security patches from stable: - High Use-after-free in text editing. Credit to David Bloom of the Google Security Team, Google Chrome Security Team (Inferno) and Google Chrome Security Team (Cris Neckar). - High Memory corruption with enormous text area. Credit to wushi of team509. - High Bad cast with the SVG use element. Credit to the kuzzcc. - High Use-after-free in text control selections. Credit to "vkouchna". - High Integer overflows in font handling. Credit to Aki Helin of OUSPG. - High Bad use of destroyed frame object. Credit to various developers, including "gundlach". - High Type confusions with event objects. Credit to "fam.lam" and Google Chrome Security Team (Inferno). - High Out-of-bounds array access in SVG handling. Credit to wushi of team509. unblock chromium-browser/6.0.472.63~r59945-2 Cheers, Giuseppe. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkzWVUYACgkQNxpp46476appGwCfaXsVOxYxdNYdx9SwVE07RRMr 25EAoIGckfg/18zTuS4B+L3JGq4HD45p =+Ayu -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101107072913.3531.61065.report...@sd6-casa.iuculano.it
SOAP::Lite: enquiry about freeze exception
The latest release of libsoap-lite-perl fixes #602056. This was marked
grave because it "renders package unusable". I am not sure if this
warrants a freeze exception. I would appreciate an opinion and
appropriate action. Debdiff attached.
diff -Nru libsoap-lite-perl-0.712/debian/changelog
libsoap-lite-perl-0.712/debian/changelog
--- libsoap-lite-perl-0.712/debian/changelog2010-06-13 13:35:46.0
+0100
+++ libsoap-lite-perl-0.712/debian/changelog2010-11-03 11:15:36.0
+
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+libsoap-lite-perl (0.712-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+ [ gregor herrmann ]
+ * Remove Conflicts: libsoap-perl.
+
+ [ Nicholas Bamber ]
+ * Applying patch to fix hash reference crash (Closes: #602056)
+
+ -- gregor herrmann Sat, 31 Jul 2010 15:32:20 -0400
+
libsoap-lite-perl (0.712-1) unstable; urgency=low
[ Franck Joncourt ]
diff -Nru libsoap-lite-perl-0.712/debian/control
libsoap-lite-perl-0.712/debian/control
--- libsoap-lite-perl-0.712/debian/control 2010-06-06 18:46:58.0
+0100
+++ libsoap-lite-perl-0.712/debian/control 2010-11-03 08:20:20.0
+
@@ -27,7 +27,6 @@
perl (>= 5.10.0) | libversion-perl, libtask-weaken-perl, perl (>= 5.9.3),
libclass-inspector-perl
Suggests: libapache2-mod-perl2, libnet-jabber-perl, libmime-lite-perl
-Conflicts: libsoap-perl
Description: Perl implementation of a SOAP client and server
SOAP::Lite is a collection of Perl modules that provide a simple and
lightweight interface to the Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) both on
diff -Nru libsoap-lite-perl-0.712/debian/patches/hashref_crash.patch
libsoap-lite-perl-0.712/debian/patches/hashref_crash.patch
--- libsoap-lite-perl-0.712/debian/patches/hashref_crash.patch 1970-01-01
01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ libsoap-lite-perl-0.712/debian/patches/hashref_crash.patch 2010-11-03
11:30:12.0 +
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+--- a/lib/SOAP/Lite.pm
b/lib/SOAP/Lite.pm
+@@ -3747,13 +3747,13 @@
+ # fillup parameters
+ UNIVERSAL::isa($_[$param] => 'SOAP::Data')
+ ? $_[$param]->SOAP::Data::value($value)
+-: UNIVERSAL::isa($_[$param] => 'ARRAY')
++: (ref($_[$param] eq 'ARRAY'))
+ ? (@{$_[$param]} = @$value)
+-: UNIVERSAL::isa($_[$param] => 'HASH')
++: (ref($_[$param]) eq 'HASH')
+ ? (%{$_[$param]} = %$value)
+-: UNIVERSAL::isa($_[$param] => 'SCALAR')
++: (ref($_[$param]) eq 'SCALAR')
+ ? (${$_[$param]} = $$value)
+-: ($_[$param] = $value)
++: ($_[$param] = $value);
+ }
+ }
+ }
diff -Nru libsoap-lite-perl-0.712/debian/patches/series
libsoap-lite-perl-0.712/debian/patches/series
--- libsoap-lite-perl-0.712/debian/patches/series 2010-06-13
13:33:07.0 +0100
+++ libsoap-lite-perl-0.712/debian/patches/series 2010-11-07
09:21:01.0 +
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
spelling.patch
+hashref_crash.patch
Re: SOAP::Lite: enquiry about freeze exception
On 11/07/2010 11:08 AM, Nicholas Bamber wrote: > The latest release of libsoap-lite-perl fixes #602056. This was > marked grave because it "renders package unusable". I am not sure if > this warrants a freeze exception. I would appreciate an opinion and > appropriate action. Debdiff attached. The debdiff attached doesn't match what's in the archive, fwiw. Fixing an RC bug is enough reason to unblock the package, if the changes are ok (which is the case here). I added an unblock hint for libsoap-lite-perl/0.712-2 and it will migrate during next britney's run. (Please report a bug against release.debian.org with appropriate usertags set for future unblock requests). Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cd68001.8070...@dogguy.org
Bug#602659: marked as done (unblock: gnome-orca/2.30.2-2)
Your message dated Sun, 07 Nov 2010 11:33:49 +0100 with message-id <4cd6808d.8050...@dogguy.org> and subject line Re: Bug#602659: unblock: gnome-orca/2.30.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #602659, regarding unblock: gnome-orca/2.30.2-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 602659: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602659 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Hi, please unblock gnome-orca for a RC bug fix. gnome-orca (2.30.2-2) unstable; urgency=low * Add missing dependency on python-dbus. Closes: #576226. Thanks, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “If you behave this way because you are blackmailed by someone, `-[…] I will see what I can do for you.” -- Jörg Schilling signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 11/06/2010 11:35 PM, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: freeze-exception > > Hi, > > please unblock gnome-orca for a RC bug fix. > Done. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ --- End Message ---
Bug#602670: marked as done (unblock: meta-gnome2/1:2.30+6)
Your message dated Sun, 07 Nov 2010 11:32:57 +0100 with message-id <4cd68059.1040...@dogguy.org> and subject line Re: Bug#602670: unblock: meta-gnome2/1:2.30+6 has caused the Debian Bug report #602670, regarding unblock: meta-gnome2/1:2.30+6 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 602670: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602670 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Hi, sorry to ask twice the same day, but there is another change in meta-gnome2 that should be meant for squeeze. meta-gnome2 (1:2.30+6) unstable; urgency=low * Make gnome-accessibility depend on freedesktop-sound-theme. Having the sound theme installed allows users to enable it from the sound preferences. Of course it is disabled by default, since it is a very annoying for the average user. Cheers, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “If you behave this way because you are blackmailed by someone, `-[…] I will see what I can do for you.” -- Jörg Schilling signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 11/07/2010 01:15 AM, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: freeze-exception > > Hi, > > sorry to ask twice the same day, but there is another change in > meta-gnome2 that should be meant for squeeze. > > meta-gnome2 (1:2.30+6) unstable; urgency=low > > * Make gnome-accessibility depend on freedesktop-sound-theme. > Unblocked. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ --- End Message ---
RM: zookeeper/testing -- ROM; not good enough for Debian stable
These are the reasons for the removal request, copied from bug #602694: - I'm leaving my current company and can not be sure whether I'll continue using zookeeper. - I don't feel confident enough yet to maintain such a complicate package in Debian stable. - I'd like to cooperate with upstream to get them involved in the packaging and have their commitment for a long term support version of zookeeper. There's no package depending on zookeeper in Squeeze. Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: RM: zookeeper/testing -- ROM; not good enough for Debian stable
On 11/07/2010 11:23 AM, Thomas Koch wrote: > These are the reasons for the removal request, copied from bug #602694: > Removal hint added. Cheers, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cd6829f.7070...@dogguy.org
Bug#602657: marked as done (unblock: gksu/2.0.2-5)
Your message dated Sun, 07 Nov 2010 11:46:17 +0100 with message-id <4cd68379.5010...@dogguy.org> and subject line Re: Bug#602657: unblock: gksu/2.0.2-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #602657, regarding unblock: gksu/2.0.2-5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 602657: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602657 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Hi, please unblock gksu again for a translation fix. gksu (2.0.2-5) unstable; urgency=low * 01_desktop_in.patch: new patch. Ship gksu.desktop.in since it was forgot in the upstream tarball. Closes: #601257. Thanks, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “If you behave this way because you are blackmailed by someone, `-[…] I will see what I can do for you.” -- Jörg Schilling signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 11/06/2010 11:33 PM, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: freeze-exception > > Hi, > > please unblock gksu again for a translation fix. > Unblocked. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ --- End Message ---
Bug#602658: marked as done (unblock: vino/2.28.2-2)
Your message dated Sun, 07 Nov 2010 11:45:38 +0100 with message-id <4cd68352.3050...@dogguy.org> and subject line Re: Bug#602658: unblock: vino/2.28.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #602658, regarding unblock: vino/2.28.2-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 602658: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602658 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Hi, please unblock vino to fix an important regression. vino (2.28.2-2) unstable; urgency=low [ Josselin Mouette ] * Drop type-handling usage. Closes: #587865. * Bump standards version accordingly. [ Jordi Mallach ] * Set the GNOME team as primary maintainer. [ Josselin Mouette ] * 11_hurd_maxhostnamelen.patch: updated to not just crash dumbly. Closes: #600704, #570615. Thanks, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “If you behave this way because you are blackmailed by someone, `-[…] I will see what I can do for you.” -- Jörg Schilling signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 11/06/2010 11:35 PM, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: freeze-exception > > Hi, > > please unblock vino to fix an important regression. > Unblocked. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ --- End Message ---
Bug#602654: marked as done (unblock: brasero/2.30.3-2)
Your message dated Sun, 07 Nov 2010 11:49:08 +0100 with message-id <4cd68424.1060...@dogguy.org> and subject line Re: Bug#602654: unblock: brasero/2.30.3-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #602654, regarding unblock: brasero/2.30.3-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 602654: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602654 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Hi, please unblock brasero for a bug fix. brasero (2.30.3-2) unstable; urgency=low * 50_checksum.patch: stolen from upstream git. Fixes image checksumming. Closes: #495469. Thanks, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “If you behave this way because you are blackmailed by someone, `-[…] I will see what I can do for you.” -- Jörg Schilling signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 11/06/2010 11:24 PM, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: freeze-exception > > Hi, > > please unblock brasero for a bug fix. > Unblocked. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ --- End Message ---
Bug#602656: marked as done (unblock: gnome-speech/0.4.25-3)
Your message dated Sun, 07 Nov 2010 11:48:12 +0100 with message-id <4cd683ec.4010...@dogguy.org> and subject line Re: Bug#602656: unblock: gnome-speech/0.4.25-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #602656, regarding unblock: gnome-speech/0.4.25-3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 602656: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602656 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Hi, please unblock gnome-speech for a bugfix and a translation. gnome-speech (1:0.4.25-3) unstable; urgency=low [ Mario Lang ] * debian/watch: Fix so that it matches current major version directory. [ Josselin Mouette ] * vi.po: updated translation by Clytie Siddall. Closes: #601562. * Use simple-patchsys. * 01_festival_eof.patch: patch from Samuel Thibault. Handle EOF on sockets. Closes: #601171. Cheers, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “If you behave this way because you are blackmailed by someone, `-[…] I will see what I can do for you.” -- Jörg Schilling signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 11/06/2010 11:31 PM, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: freeze-exception > > Hi, > > please unblock gnome-speech for a bugfix and a translation. > Unblocked. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ --- End Message ---
Bug#602653: marked as done (unblock: at-spi/1.30.1-3)
Your message dated Sun, 07 Nov 2010 11:50:21 +0100 with message-id <4cd6846d.4010...@dogguy.org> and subject line Re: Bug#602653: unblock: at-spi/1.30.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #602653, regarding unblock: at-spi/1.30.1-3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 602653: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602653 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Hi, please unblock at-spi for a crasher. at-spi (1.30.1-3) unstable; urgency=low * 01_type_init.patch: patch from Samuel Thibault. Correctly call g_type_init before using GConf. Closes: #601163. Thanks, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “If you behave this way because you are blackmailed by someone, `-[…] I will see what I can do for you.” -- Jörg Schilling signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 11/06/2010 11:23 PM, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: freeze-exception > > Hi, > > please unblock at-spi for a crasher. > Unblocked. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ --- End Message ---
Bug#602652: marked as done (unblock: debtags/1.7.11)
Your message dated Sun, 07 Nov 2010 11:54:29 +0100
with message-id <4cd68565.9080...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#602652: unblock: debtags/1.7.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #602652,
regarding unblock: debtags/1.7.11
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
602652: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602652
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package debtags
It fixes bug #602634.
The debdiff is somewhat polluted by autotools updates. The important bit
is this one:
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index d6a1c0a..fd717ca 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
dnl Process this file with autoconf to produce a configure script.
-AC_INIT(debtags, 1.7.10, [enr...@debian.org])
+AC_INIT(debtags, 1.7.11, [enr...@debian.org])
AC_CONFIG_SRCDIR([configure.ac])
AM_CONFIG_HEADER(config.h)
AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([foreign])
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 05cec5b..6759936 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+debtags (1.7.11) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Update /var/lib/debtags/package-tags. Closes: #602634.
+
+ -- Enrico Zini Sat, 06 Nov 2010 19:33:06 +
+
debtags (1.7.10) unstable; urgency=low
* Build with new libept. Closes: #588546
diff --git a/tools/debtags.cc b/tools/debtags.cc
index 4ec2ea0..27a7de9 100644
--- a/tools/debtags.cc
+++ b/tools/debtags.cc
@@ -544,6 +544,68 @@ public:
}
};
+struct AtomicStdioWriter
+{
+ std::string fname;
+ char* tmpfname;
+ int fd;
+ FILE* out;
+
+ AtomicStdioWriter(const std::string& fname)
+ : fname(fname), tmpfname(0), out(0), fd(-1)
+ {
+ // Build the temp file template
+ tmpfname = new char[fname.size() + 8];
+ strncpy(tmpfname, fname.c_str(), fname.size());
+ strncpy(tmpfname + fname.size(), ".XX", 8);
+ // Create and open the temporary file
+ fd = mkstemp(tmpfname);
+ if (fd < 0)
+ throw wibble::exception::File(tmpfname, "opening file");
+
+ // Pass the file descriptor to stdio
+ out = fdopen(fd, "wt");
+ if (!out)
+ throw wibble::exception::File(tmpfname, "fdopening
file");
+ }
+
+ ~AtomicStdioWriter()
+ {
+ if (out)
+ {
+ if (unlink(tmpfname) == -1)
+ throw wibble::exception::File(tmpfname, "cannot
delete temporary file");
+ fclose(out);
+ }
+ if (tmpfname) delete[] tmpfname;
+ }
+
+ void flush()
+ {
+ // Read the current umask
+ mode_t cur_umask = umask(0);
+ umask(cur_umask);
+
+ // Give the file the right permissions
+ if (fchmod(fd, 0666 & ~cur_umask) < 0)
+ throw wibble::exception::File(tmpfname, "setting file
permissions");
+
+ // Flush stdio's buffers
+ fflush(out);
+
+ // Flush OS buffers
+ fdatasync(fd);
+
+ // Close the file
+ fclose(out);
+ out = NULL;
+
+ // Rename the successfully written file to its final name
+ if (rename(tmpfname, fname.c_str()) == -1)
+ throw wibble::exception::System(string("renaming ") +
tmpfname + " to " + fname);
+ }
+};
+
int main(int argc, const char* argv[])
{
wibble::commandline::DebtagsOptions opts;
@@ -1172,6 +1234,13 @@ int main(int argc, const char* argv[])
// Write out the merged, updated vocabulary
voc.write();
+
+ // Read and merge all tag sources, and write them out
+ {
+ AtomicStdioWriter
writer(debtags::Path::tagdb());
+
env().debtags().output(textformat::StdioWriter(writer.out));
+ writer.flush();
+ }
}
else if (opts.foundCommand() == opts.vocfilter)
{
Code for AtomicStdioWriter comes from ept/debtags/vocabulary.cc in
libept, which is used to atomically write /var/lib/debtags/vocabulary
unblock debtags/1.7.11
-- System
Bug#602646: marked as done (unblock: gnome-nettool/2.30.0-2)
Your message dated Sun, 07 Nov 2010 11:58:29 +0100 with message-id <4cd68655.2070...@dogguy.org> and subject line Re: Bug#602646: unblock: gnome-nettool/2.30.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #602646, regarding unblock: gnome-nettool/2.30.0-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 602646: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602646 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Hi, please unblock gnome-nettool for a dependency adjustment. gnome-nettool (2.30.0-2) unstable; urgency=low * Drop the alternative dependency on traceroute. Closes: #458723. Thanks, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “If you behave this way because you are blackmailed by someone, `-[…] I will see what I can do for you.” -- Jörg Schilling signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 11/06/2010 10:15 PM, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: freeze-exception > > Hi, > > please unblock gnome-nettool for a dependency adjustment. > Unblocked. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ --- End Message ---
Bug#602647: marked as done (unblock: gnome-screensaver/2.30.0-2)
Your message dated Sun, 07 Nov 2010 11:56:51 +0100 with message-id <4cd685f3.4040...@dogguy.org> and subject line Re: Bug#602647: unblock: gnome-screensaver/2.30.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #602647, regarding unblock: gnome-screensaver/2.30.0-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 602647: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602647 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Hi, please unblock gnome-screensaver for dependency adjustments. gnome-screensaver (2.30.0-2) unstable; urgency=low * Depend on gnome-session-bin instead of gnome-session. Closes: #552436. * Only suggest rss-glx. Closes: #599634. Thanks, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “If you behave this way because you are blackmailed by someone, `-[…] I will see what I can do for you.” -- Jörg Schilling signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 11/06/2010 10:16 PM, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: freeze-exception > > Hi, > > please unblock gnome-screensaver for dependency adjustments. > Unblocked. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ --- End Message ---
Bug#602492: unblock: crashmail/0.71-4
tags 602492 + moreinfo thanks On 11/06/2010 04:38 PM, Peter Krefting wrote: > Mehdi Dogguy: >> Did you test it on kFreeBSD? Does it work fine? > > I have to admit that I have not tested it on kFreeBSD, but the buildd > logs at https://buildd.debian.org/build.cgi?pkg=crashmail> > indicate that the 0.71-4 version builds for it, while 0.71-3 did > not. > I won't unblock the package if it's not properly tested there since we don't if it actually works. Please test it there and report back, if you still want it to be part of Squeeze; or close this bugreport. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cd687cc.4010...@dogguy.org
Processed: Re: Bug#602492: unblock: crashmail/0.71-4
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 602492 + moreinfo Bug #602492 [release.debian.org] unblock: crashmail/0.71-4 Added tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 602492: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602492 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.128912810223045.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#602643: marked as done (unblock: esound/0.2.41-8)
Your message dated Sun, 07 Nov 2010 12:01:09 +0100 with message-id <4cd686f5.2020...@dogguy.org> and subject line Re: Bug#602643: unblock: esound/0.2.41-8 has caused the Debian Bug report #602643, regarding unblock: esound/0.2.41-8 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 602643: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602643 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Hi, please unblock esound for a bugfix and a package dropped from the default installation. esound (0.2.41-8) unstable; urgency=low [ Emilio Pozuelo Monfort ] * debian/patches/03_hurd.patch: - Add header. [ Josselin Mouette ] * Drop type-handling usage. Closes: #587862. * Bump standards version accordingly. * Only suggest esound-clients. Closes: #599662. * 04_audsp_crash.patch: patch from Samuel Thibault to fix a crasher in audsp. Closes: #601295. Thanks, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “If you behave this way because you are blackmailed by someone, `-[…] I will see what I can do for you.” -- Jörg Schilling signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 11/06/2010 10:12 PM, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: freeze-exception > > Hi, > > please unblock esound for a bugfix and a package dropped from the > default installation. > Unblocked. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ --- End Message ---
Re: SOAP::Lite: enquiry about freeze exception
Thanks Mehdi Dogguy wrote: On 11/07/2010 11:08 AM, Nicholas Bamber wrote: The latest release of libsoap-lite-perl fixes #602056. This was marked grave because it "renders package unusable". I am not sure if this warrants a freeze exception. I would appreciate an opinion and appropriate action. Debdiff attached. The debdiff attached doesn't match what's in the archive, fwiw. Fixing an RC bug is enough reason to unblock the package, if the changes are ok (which is the case here). I added an unblock hint for libsoap-lite-perl/0.712-2 and it will migrate during next britney's run. (Please report a bug against release.debian.org with appropriate usertags set for future unblock requests). Regards, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cd68661.40...@periapt.co.uk
Re: (future unblock) RFS: mobile-broadband-provider-info (updated package)
On 11/07/2010 06:41 AM, Paul Wise wrote: > On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 12:13 AM, Bhavani Shankar R wrote: > >> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 20101106-1 >> of my package "mobile-broadband-provider-info". > > Uploaded. > and unblocked. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cd6899e.4070...@dogguy.org
Bug#602614: marked as done (unblock: sane-backends/1.0.21-6)
Your message dated Sun, 07 Nov 2010 12:14:45 +0100 with message-id <4cd68a25.1010...@dogguy.org> and subject line Re: Bug#602614: unblock: sane-backends/1.0.21-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #602614, regarding unblock: sane-backends/1.0.21-6 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 602614: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602614 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi, Please unblock package sane-backends This revision adds a new debconf translation, fixes an annoying bug in saned, adds some new USB IDs and some missing SCSI IDs. Full changelog: sane-backends (1.0.21-6) unstable; urgency=low * debian/patches/saned_exit_avahi_process.patch: + Added; exit Avahi process on error/loop termination. * debian/patches/xerox_mfp_new_ids.patch: + Added; add USB IDs for supported machines in xerox_mfp (closes: #601748). * debian/patches/scsi_perfection_2450.patch: + Added; add SCSI IDs for the Perfection 2450 via FireWire (closes: #601810). * debian/patches/scsi_scanjet_4c.patch: + Added; add SCSI IDs for the ScanJet 4c (closes: #601656). * debconf translations: + vi.po: courtesy of Clytie Siddall (closes: #601530). -- Julien BLACHE Sat, 06 Nov 2010 11:21:40 +0100 Nothing earth-shattering :) unblock sane-backends/1.0.21-6 Thanks, JB. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.35-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/6 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C, lc_ctype=fr...@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 11/06/2010 03:52 PM, Julien BLACHE wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > > > Hi, > > Please unblock package sane-backends > Unblocked. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ --- End Message ---
Bug#602686: marked as done (unblock: chromium-browser/6.0.472.63~r59945-2)
Your message dated Sun, 07 Nov 2010 12:18:01 +0100 with message-id <4cd68ae9.30...@dogguy.org> and subject line Re: Bug#602686: unblock: chromium-browser/6.0.472.63~r59945-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #602686, regarding unblock: chromium-browser/6.0.472.63~r59945-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 602686: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602686 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Please unblock package chromium-browser chromium-browser (6.0.472.63~r59945-2) unstable; urgency=high * Added the missing changelog credit for the 5.0.375.29~r46008-1 revision. Obviously this was not a "stealing" as foolishly written by Fabien Tassin in a blog rant, but was a bad debian/changelog merge. * Backported security patches from stable: - High Use-after-free in text editing. Credit to David Bloom of the Google Security Team, Google Chrome Security Team (Inferno) and Google Chrome Security Team (Cris Neckar). - High Memory corruption with enormous text area. Credit to wushi of team509. - High Bad cast with the SVG use element. Credit to the kuzzcc. - High Use-after-free in text control selections. Credit to "vkouchna". - High Integer overflows in font handling. Credit to Aki Helin of OUSPG. - High Bad use of destroyed frame object. Credit to various developers, including "gundlach". - High Type confusions with event objects. Credit to "fam.lam" and Google Chrome Security Team (Inferno). - High Out-of-bounds array access in SVG handling. Credit to wushi of team509. unblock chromium-browser/6.0.472.63~r59945-2 Cheers, Giuseppe. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkzWVUYACgkQNxpp46476appGwCfaXsVOxYxdNYdx9SwVE07RRMr 25EAoIGckfg/18zTuS4B+L3JGq4HD45p =+Ayu -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 11/07/2010 08:29 AM, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: freeze-exception > > Please unblock package chromium-browser > Unblocked. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ --- End Message ---
Bug#602645: marked as done (unblock: gnome-icon-theme/2.30.3-2)
Your message dated Sun, 07 Nov 2010 12:05:49 +0100 with message-id <4cd6880d.5010...@dogguy.org> and subject line Re: Bug#602645: unblock: gnome-icon-theme/2.30.3-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #602645, regarding unblock: gnome-icon-theme/2.30.3-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 602645: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602645 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Hi, please unblock gnome-icon-theme for a dependency adjustment. gnome-icon-theme (2.30.3-2) unstable; urgency=low * Break evolution < 2.30 and gnome-games < 1:2.30.2-1. Thanks, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “If you behave this way because you are blackmailed by someone, `-[…] I will see what I can do for you.” -- Jörg Schilling signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 11/06/2010 10:14 PM, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: freeze-exception > > Hi, > > please unblock gnome-icon-theme for a dependency adjustment. > Unblocked. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ --- End Message ---
Re: openscenegraph 2.4.0-1.1: embedded copy of vulnerable lib3ds
On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 11:55 +0100, Alberto Luaces wrote: > recently a bug has been reported for the lenny version of the > openscenegraph 2.4.0-1.1 source package, based upon the fact that this > package includes an embedded, vulnerable copy of the lib3ds library: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=601181 > > The security team said that our proposed update did not warrant a > security update, and that we should make a stable release instead. > > The Debian Developers of this package and me have now available a new > version of the package which removes the embedded copy and makes the > compilation process link the generated libraries against Debian system's > lib3ds version. Your own comment in the bug referenced above is that the embedded copy of lib3ds contains changes which are not in the standard library. If that is the case, then won't using the packaged library cause problems and/or regressions? > I'm attaching the diff in this mail for you to > inspect. That "diff" appears to be the entire of the debian/ directory, including changelog entries going back to 2004. In order to review it, we'd need a debdiff of the source package currently in stable compared to your proposed update (i.e. a debdiff of the .dscs). > I wonder if the `high' priority that I have given to this > release is fine or not. Urgency is basically irrelevant for stable updates, as it makes no difference as to when the package will move from p-u-new to proposed-updates nor from there in to stable. (fwiw, the version number should be 2.4.0-1.1+lenny1 or similar; possibly 2.4.0-2 if there was never such a revision in the archive. The current versioning implies that the package is an update to 2.4.0-2, which is not the case) Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1289132915.27850.5929.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: Bug#594940: Includes binary-only and obfuscated C code
On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 10:48 +0100, Petr Salinger wrote: > > For the remainder of the files, whilst we may consider granting a > > squeeze-ignore tag, we would like to come to an agreement as to how we > > can resolve these issues in the medium term. We appreciate that the BSD > > kernel has not received the same level of upstream attention that the > > Linux kernel has in recent years in terms of ensuring that all content > > is freely distributable. We believe that working with them on these > > issues can only be of benefit for free software, and would help to move > > the kfreebsd-* architectures from "technology previews" towards fully > > supported stable releases with everything we have to come to expect from > > the Linux architectures. [...] > Now we have to somehow prune current source tree and disable some > modules. Could we get squeeze-ignore tag for some of the affected > files or is it necessary to prune all affected files ? Ben's original lists included some files which we don't appear to be able to distribute at all. If his analysis is correct then those files at least would need to be removed rather than ignored. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1289134240.27850.6039.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
sendmail 8.1.4.4-1(was: Re: Richard A Nelson (Rick) MIA)
On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 08:09 +0100, Harald Jenny wrote: > On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 04:48:08PM -0700, Richard A Nelson wrote: > > On Mon, 1 Nov 2010, Harald Jenny wrote: > > >Could you give us a quick overview what the current state of > > >packaging sendmail and libmilter is? Do you need any help? Is there a > > >chance to > > >get this new version still into Squeeze (release team?) or should we rather > > >focus on backporting the necessary changes to 8.14.3? As the libmilter > > >problem > > >renders a class of applications unreliable this should IMHO really be > > >classified as RC bug. [...] > > sendmail_8.14.4-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable [...] > > So, barring bugs, it should hit testing soon > > Thanks - and I hope the release team will allow this transition to take place. Which libmilter problem are you referring to? There don't appear to be any RC bugs closed by the upload. With a little massaging of the diff (tarball-in-tarball with versioned directory names sucks), I can get down to 146 files changed, 2092 insertions(+), 999 deletions(-) but that's still quite large for an update at this point. :-/ Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1289134326.27850.6045.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#602707: unblock: syslog-ng/3.1.2-2
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi, Please unblock syslog-ng 3.1.2-2 , which fixes an initscript bug[1] on reload. The diff is small: --- debian/syslog-ng.init 2010-08-04 21:12:39.0 +0200 +++ debian/syslog-ng.init 2010-11-04 19:15:31.0 +0100 @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ if $SYSLOGNG -s $SYSLOGNG_OPTS then start-stop-daemon --stop --signal 1 --quiet --exec "$SYSLOGNG" \ ---pidfile "$PIDFILE" $SYSLOGNG_OPTS +--pidfile "$PIDFILE" RET="$?" log_end_msg $RET return $RET Thanks, Laszlo/GCS [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=599276 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1289134812.23986.192.ca...@julia.gcs.org.hu
Re: Bug#594940: Includes binary-only and obfuscated C code
Now we have to somehow prune current source tree and disable some modules. Could we get squeeze-ignore tag for some of the affected files or is it necessary to prune all affected files ? Ben's original lists included some files which we don't appear to be able to distribute at all. If his analysis is correct then those files at least would need to be removed rather than ignored. The question is whether pruning following files suffices: sys/gnu/dev/sound/pci/csaimg.h - not packaged; not distributable since the stated licence is GPL sys/gnu/dev/sound/pci/maestro3_dsp.h - not packaged; not distributable since the stated licence is GPL sys/dev/fatm/firmware.h - not packaged; not distributable sys/contrib/dev/nve/i386/nvenetlib.o.bz2.uu sys/contrib/dev/nve/amd64/nvenetlib.o.bz2.uu sys/dev/hptrr/amd64-elf.hptrr_lib.o.uu sys/dev/hptrr/i386-elf.hptrr_lib.o.uu sys/dev/hptmv/i386-elf.raid.o.uu sys/dev/hptmv/amd64-elf.raid.o.uu - uuencoded files with binary code to run on the host, without accompanying source code (not used even now - see 903_disable_non-free_drivers.diff) Or whether we have to drop all mentioned files or something between. Petr -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pine.lnx.4.62.1011071402320.25...@sci.felk.cvut.cz
unblock request: xserver-xorg-video-geode
Greetings,
I realize that we are pretty deep into the freeze, but since the
unstable package includes some hardware support fixes, some of which
specifically affect the OLPC, I figured that I might as well ask
anyway, just in case. The changes between 2.11.9-5 and 2.11.9-7 are as
follow:
+ * Merged patch from upstream GIT:
+- Move eCafe EC800 support to panel-only BIOS-dependant feature.
Not essential, but given how we've been trying to properly support
this laptop for ages (see #591364 for instance), might be worth
including.
+- Replace custom Geode offscreen allocation with standard EXA calls.
Long requested by X core developers and finally implemented by AMD developers.
+- Add lx_output_get_crtc to prevent driver reset with unknown CRTC.
+- Prevent OLPC DCON from sleeping when it's in frozen state.
Both changes specifically aim at fixing OLPC issues, although the
first one benefits others too.
The debdiff is attached. It includes one patch that was renamed
between these two releases.
Best Regards,
Martin-Éric
diff -u xserver-xorg-video-geode-2.11.9/debian/changelog
xserver-xorg-video-geode-2.11.9/debian/changelog
--- xserver-xorg-video-geode-2.11.9/debian/changelog
+++ xserver-xorg-video-geode-2.11.9/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,19 @@
+xserver-xorg-video-geode (2.11.9-7) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Merged patch from upstream GIT:
+- Move eCafe EC800 support to panel-only BIOS-dependant feature.
+
+ -- Martin-Éric Racine Thu, 28 Oct 2010 13:01:52 +0300
+
+xserver-xorg-video-geode (2.11.9-6) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Merged patches from upstream GIT:
+- Replace custom Geode offscreen allocation with standard EXA calls.
+- Add lx_output_get_crtc to prevent driver reset with unknown CRTC.
+- Prevent OLPC DCON from sleeping when it's in frozen state.
+
+ -- Martin-Éric Racine Wed, 27 Oct 2010 19:00:17 +0300
+
xserver-xorg-video-geode (2.11.9-5) unstable; urgency=low
* Merged patches from upstream GIT:
reverted:
--- xserver-xorg-video-geode-2.11.9/debian/patches/003_sync_mode_typo.patch
+++ xserver-xorg-video-geode-2.11.9.orig/debian/patches/003_sync_mode_typo.patch
@@ -1,24 +0,0 @@
-From becaa0ae375e996c2f83192bb84a5c89f94933dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Frank Huang
-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 08:45:42 +
-Subject: Fix a typo on resolution parameter
-
-*change from 1028 to 1280
-
-Signed-off-by: Frank Huang
-diff --git a/src/lx_panel.c b/src/lx_panel.c
-index f1d0686..2e076d4 100644
a/src/lx_panel.c
-+++ b/src/lx_panel.c
-@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ DisplayModeRec lx_panel_modes[] = {
- {MODEPREFIX, 81600, 1152, 1216, 1336, 1520, 0, 864, 865, 868, 895, 0,
- V_NHSYNC | V_NVSYNC, MODESUFFIX}
- ,/* 1152x...@60 */
--{MODEPREFIX, 108000, 1028, 1328, 1440, 1688, 0, 1024, 1025, 1028, 1066, 0,
-+{MODEPREFIX, 108000, 1280, 1328, 1440, 1688, 0, 1024, 1025, 1028, 1066, 0,
- V_NHSYNC | V_NVSYNC, MODESUFFIX}
- ,/* 1280x1...@60 */
- {MODEPREFIX, 162000, 1600, 1664, 1856, 2160, 0, 1200, 1201, 1204, 1250, 0,
---
-cgit v0.8.3-6-g21f6
reverted:
--- xserver-xorg-video-geode-2.11.9/debian/patches/001_fix_DCON_detection.patch
+++
xserver-xorg-video-geode-2.11.9.orig/debian/patches/001_fix_DCON_detection.patch
@@ -1,33 +0,0 @@
-Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 11:31:29 -0700
-From: Andres Salomon
-Subject: fix the DCON verification loop for LX output
-
-This is pretty clearly a bug. This should fix it (after all, that
-check is merely to see if the panel is a DCON; we don't care at
-all about the panel bit). This also adds an extra parenthesis in
-the following if() statement for clarity.
-
-I'm resisting the temptation to change GeodeRec's Output member to
-an unsigned long (for now). Bitfields should really be unsigned.
-
-Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon
-
a/src/lx_output.c 2010-09-20 18:03:52.0 +
-+++ b/src/lx_output.c 2010-09-20 18:23:41.0 +
-@@ -156,13 +156,13 @@
- GeodeRec *pGeode = GEODEPTR(pScrni);
-
- /* DCON Panel specific resolution - OLPC's one */
--if (pGeode->Output & (OUTPUT_PANEL | OUTPUT_DCON)) {
-+if (pGeode->Output & OUTPUT_DCON) {
- if (pGeode->panelMode->HDisplay == 1200 &&
- pGeode->panelMode->VDisplay == 900)
- return MODE_OK;
- }
-
--if (pGeode->Output & OUTPUT_PANEL &&
-+if ((pGeode->Output & OUTPUT_PANEL) &&
- gfx_is_panel_mode_supported(pGeode->panelMode->HDisplay,
- pGeode->panelMode->VDisplay,
- pMode->HDisplay,
-
only in patch2:
unchanged:
---
xserver-xorg-video-geode-2.11.9.orig/debian/patches/006_replace_custom_with_EXA.patch
+++
xserver-xorg-video-geode-2.11.9/debian/patches/006_replace_custom_with_EXA.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,168 @@
+From 5e72a00ad26f2052bb48fef041d6fbd14ba18153 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Hunk Cui
+Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 10:26:52 +
+Subject: Allocate vide
Bug#602707: marked as done (unblock: syslog-ng/3.1.2-2)
Your message dated Sun, 07 Nov 2010 14:58:31 +0100 with message-id <4cd6b087.9020...@dogguy.org> and subject line Re: Bug#602707: unblock: syslog-ng/3.1.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #602707, regarding unblock: syslog-ng/3.1.2-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 602707: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602707 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi, Please unblock syslog-ng 3.1.2-2 , which fixes an initscript bug[1] on reload. The diff is small: --- debian/syslog-ng.init 2010-08-04 21:12:39.0 +0200 +++ debian/syslog-ng.init 2010-11-04 19:15:31.0 +0100 @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ if $SYSLOGNG -s $SYSLOGNG_OPTS then start-stop-daemon --stop --signal 1 --quiet --exec "$SYSLOGNG" \ ---pidfile "$PIDFILE" $SYSLOGNG_OPTS +--pidfile "$PIDFILE" RET="$?" log_end_msg $RET return $RET Thanks, Laszlo/GCS [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=599276 --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 11/07/2010 02:00 PM, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > > Hi, > > Please unblock syslog-ng 3.1.2-2 , which fixes an initscript bug[1] on > reload. Unblocked. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ --- End Message ---
NEW changes in proposedupdates
Processing changes file: pidgin_2.4.3-4lenny8_amd64.changes Rejecting. REJECT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1pf5ll-0005gb...@franck.debian.org
Re: openscenegraph 2.4.0-1.1: embedded copy of vulnerable lib3ds
"Adam D. Barratt" writes: > On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 11:55 +0100, Alberto Luaces wrote: >> recently a bug has been reported for the lenny version of the >> openscenegraph 2.4.0-1.1 source package, based upon the fact that this >> package includes an embedded, vulnerable copy of the lib3ds library: >> >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=601181 >> >> The security team said that our proposed update did not warrant a >> security update, and that we should make a stable release instead. >> >> The Debian Developers of this package and me have now available a new >> version of the package which removes the embedded copy and makes the >> compilation process link the generated libraries against Debian system's >> lib3ds version. > > Your own comment in the bug referenced above is that the embedded copy > of lib3ds contains changes which are not in the standard library. If > that is the case, then won't using the packaged library cause problems > and/or regressions? > Fortunately not, since those changes addressed some lib3ds deficiencies at that time (assumed little endianess, assumed 32 bit system) that were corrected in later lib3ds versions, including the one in stable. It is not a seriuous proof, but I have loaded some 3ds files as a test and they worked. >> I'm attaching the diff in this mail for you to >> inspect. > > That "diff" appears to be the entire of the debian/ directory, including > changelog entries going back to 2004. In order to review it, we'd need > a debdiff of the source package currently in stable compared to your > proposed update (i.e. a debdiff of the .dscs). > I'll do it and get back to you. >> I wonder if the `high' priority that I have given to this >> release is fine or not. > > Urgency is basically irrelevant for stable updates, as it makes no > difference as to when the package will move from p-u-new to > proposed-updates nor from there in to stable. > Ok. > (fwiw, the version number should be 2.4.0-1.1+lenny1 or similar; > possibly 2.4.0-2 if there was never such a revision in the archive. The > current versioning implies that the package is an update to 2.4.0-2, > which is not the case) > Understood. I will also correct this. Thank you, Alberto -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87d3qhb5m4@eps142.cdf.udc.es
Re: Permission to upload xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.13.0-2
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 21:47 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > I'd like to upload xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.13.0-2, mainly for > documentation reasons. Currently, we have in sid/squeeze a snapshot > from upstream, namely: 2:2.12.0+shadow-2. There were only a few > commits upstream between what we merged and 2.13.0; a full git log is > attached as upstream.diff; excluding (obvious?) doc-only changes, > functional changes are: > * Fix to depend on the (just-released) libdrm >= 2.4.22 >→ We've put everything we need in 2.4.21-1~squeeze3; so we kill > that change (see 2nd and 3rd bullet in Debian changelog); no-op. > * Retry framebuffer allocation if first attempt fails. >→ Bugfix. > * Disable dri2 after forcing fallbacks >→ Bugfix. > * Make driver compile for 1.6 Xserver series again. >→ No-op, since we're on >= 1.7 > * display: Refactor is_panel() >→ No-op. > * Allow interlaced modes. >→ Tiny improvement [3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)]. Please go ahead. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1289148624.27850.6594.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: openscenegraph 2.4.0-1.1: embedded copy of vulnerable lib3ds
In gmane.linux.debian.devel.release, you wrote: > --=-=-= > > Hello, > > recently a bug has been reported for the lenny version of the > openscenegraph 2.4.0-1.1 source package, based upon the fact that this > package includes an embedded, vulnerable copy of the lib3ds library: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=601181 > > The security team said that our proposed update did not warrant a > security update, and that we should make a stable release instead. > > The Debian Developers of this package and me have now available a new > version of the package which removes the embedded copy and makes the > compilation process link the generated libraries against Debian system's > lib3ds version. I'm attaching the diff in this mail for you to > inspect. I wonder if the `high' priority that I have given to this > release is fine or not. That wouldn't buy us much, since lib3ds isn't fixed in Lenny yet, it would need to be updated along. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101107164152.ga4...@galadriel.inutil.org
Gajim 0.13.4-3
Hi, I fixed a bug in Gajim that makes it crash when canceling gnome keyring creation with the new version of gnome keyring. I added a small patch in Gajim 0.13.4-3 version that has been uploaded by the Debian developper that sponsors me. Could you include it in squeeze? Thanks, -- Yann -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cd6d6d7.3010...@lagaule.org
Re: Gajim 0.13.4-3
On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 17:41 +0100, Yann Leboulanger wrote: > I fixed a bug in Gajim that makes it crash when canceling gnome keyring > creation with the new version of gnome keyring. I added a small patch in > Gajim 0.13.4-3 version that has been uploaded by the Debian developper > that sponsors me. Unblocked; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1289150323.27850.6679.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#602736: RM: funguloids/1.06-8
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Please remove funguloids. It needs more work post-Squeeze to bring it in shape (adapting to current OGRE, splitting off the arch-indep game data, making Cg optional and move it to main). Cheers, Moritz -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=C, lc_ctype=de_de.iso-8859...@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101107170159.4889.83635.report...@localhost.localdomain
Re: [php-maint] Bug#601619: CVE-2010-3710: DoS in filter_var()
On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 18:24 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:45:21PM +0200, Ond??ej Surý wrote: > > Hi Moritz and Adam, > > > > I have prepared 5.3.3-3 in the git, but I would like to seek > > debian-release(Adam) advice how to proceed. Adam has unblocked 5.3.3-2 > > (with prolonged delay to 15 days)... btw thanks for that ... so > > should I upload 5.3.3-3 with this fix or wait for 5.3.3-2 to go to > > testing and then upload 5.3.3-3 with urgency=high and request an > > unblock again? > > This issue doesn't seem urgent. I would recommend to let 5.3.3-2 > with the current age-days and followup with the CVE-2010-3710 > after that. > > Maybe this would also allow the PHP maintainers to include a final > fix for 546164? 5.3.3-2 has now migrated to testing. The upstream fix for CVE-2010-3710 looks small and sane enough to be included in a -3 upload. From reading the log for 546164 I'm not sure what the fix would look like, but would be prepared to look at fixing it in squeeze. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1289157646.27850.7049.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Please unblock debarchiver
Hi Release team I would like you to unblock debarchiver package. I have added a french translation update as you can see in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=601185 debarchiver (0.9.4) unstable; urgency=low * Applied patch for french language translation. Closes: #601185. -- Ola Lundqvist Mon, 01 Nov 2010 21:38:35 +0100 Thanks in advance, // Ola -- --- Inguza Technology AB --- MSc in Information Technology / o...@inguza.comAnnebergsslingan 37\ | o...@debian.org 654 65 KARLSTAD| | http://inguza.com/Mobile: +46 (0)70-332 1551 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / --- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101107191436.gb28...@inguza.net
Please unblock vzctl
Hi I have uploaded a fix for vzctl. It turned out that one of the patches for an important bug #597876 was wrong. One character was missing. vzctl (3.0.24-10) unstable; urgency=medium * Correction of the solution for #597876. A typo cause the correction to not work. -- Ola Lundqvist Sat, 06 Nov 2010 12:46:23 +0100 Thanks in advance, // Ola -- --- Inguza Technology AB --- MSc in Information Technology / o...@inguza.comAnnebergsslingan 37\ | o...@debian.org 654 65 KARLSTAD| | http://inguza.com/Mobile: +46 (0)70-332 1551 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / --- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101107191648.gc28...@inguza.net
Re: please unblock package iceweasel-l10n for squeeze
>> Hi, Mehdi! >> >> iceweasel 3.5.13-1 has gone to squeeze, too. >> So I think that iceweasel-l10n 3.5.13-2 should be in squeeze, too. >> >> Could You unblock this package again? >> MD> Done. Hi, Mehdi! iceweasel 3.5.15 has gone to testing, again :) Could You unblock its iceweasel-l10n again? Version: 1:3.5.15+debian-1. -- ... mpd is off . ''`. Dmitry E. Oboukhov : :’ : email: un...@debian.org jabber://un...@uvw.ru `. `~’ GPGKey: 1024D / F8E26537 2006-11-21 `- 1B23 D4F8 8EC0 D902 0555 E438 AB8C 00CF F8E2 6537 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: please unblock package iceweasel-l10n for squeeze
On 11/07/2010 08:33 PM, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote: > > iceweasel 3.5.15 has gone to testing, again :) Could You unblock its > iceweasel-l10n again? > Unblocked. Please file a bug against release.debian.org with appropriate usertags set for future unblock requests. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cd70058.9060...@dogguy.org
Re: Please unblock vzctl
On 11/07/2010 08:16 PM, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > Hi > > I have uploaded a fix for vzctl. It turned out that one of the > patches for an important bug #597876 was wrong. One character > was missing. > > vzctl (3.0.24-10) unstable; urgency=medium > > * Correction of the solution for #597876. A typo cause the correction > to not work. > > -- Ola Lundqvist Sat, 06 Nov 2010 12:46:23 +0100 > Unblocked. Please file a bug against release.debian.org with appropriate usertags set for future unblock requests. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cd7009e.4010...@dogguy.org
Re: Please unblock debarchiver
On 11/07/2010 08:14 PM, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > Hi Release team > > I would like you to unblock debarchiver package. I have added > a french translation update as you can see in > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=601185 > > debarchiver (0.9.4) unstable; urgency=low > > * Applied patch for french language translation. Closes: #601185. > > -- Ola Lundqvist Mon, 01 Nov 2010 21:38:35 +0100 > Unblocked. Please file a bug against release.debian.org with appropriate usertags set for future unblock requests. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cd700fd.5030...@dogguy.org
Bug#599472: Permission to upload opensync-0.22 to testing-proposed-updates
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 20:49 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 20:58:07 +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > > > Uploading this would make it possible to potentially transition the barry > > and > > synce-sync-engine packages (which I believe were removed due to opensync), > > as > > well as the currently still at 0.22 kdepim plugin and the multisync0.90 > > package in unstable. Other still at 0.22 plugins in unstable could be > > transitioned as well, but they are less important. > > > > Further testing-proposed-updates uploads of the file and evolution2 > > plugins should be done as well, as they are quite central. > > > OK, let's go ahead with this. opensync was uploaded and has now built everywhere; I've approved it so it should enter testing in the next britney run. The -file and -evolution2 plugins are in NEW as of a few hours ago. Are there any tpu uploads remaining? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1289165200.27850.7433.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: openscenegraph 2.4.0-1.1: embedded copy of vulnerable lib3ds
Moritz Muehlenhoff writes: > In gmane.linux.debian.devel.release, you wrote: >> --=-=-= >> >> Hello, >> >> recently a bug has been reported for the lenny version of the >> openscenegraph 2.4.0-1.1 source package, based upon the fact that this >> package includes an embedded, vulnerable copy of the lib3ds library: >> >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=601181 >> >> The security team said that our proposed update did not warrant a >> security update, and that we should make a stable release instead. >> >> The Debian Developers of this package and me have now available a new >> version of the package which removes the embedded copy and makes the >> compilation process link the generated libraries against Debian system's >> lib3ds version. I'm attaching the diff in this mail for you to >> inspect. I wonder if the `high' priority that I have given to this >> release is fine or not. > > That wouldn't buy us much, since lib3ds isn't fixed in Lenny yet, it > would need to be updated along. Yes, that was my intention. It seemed sensible to me to pull out openscenegraph the insecure code and make it depend on the new lib3ds version. I thought that since lenny and squeeze versions of lib3ds are compatible, the latter could be backported in short by the security team. What do you think? Should I wait for lenny's lib3ds to get fixed or could we start updating openscenegraph to use the external library? Regards, Alberto -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87oca0g79p@gmail.com
Bug#599472: Permission to upload opensync-0.22 to testing-proposed-updates
Hi, On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 09:26:40PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 20:49 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 20:58:07 +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > > > > > Uploading this would make it possible to potentially transition the barry > > > and > > > synce-sync-engine packages (which I believe were removed due to > > > opensync), as > > > well as the currently still at 0.22 kdepim plugin and the multisync0.90 > > > package in unstable. Other still at 0.22 plugins in unstable could be > > > transitioned as well, but they are less important. > > > > > > Further testing-proposed-updates uploads of the file and evolution2 > > > plugins should be done as well, as they are quite central. > > > > > OK, let's go ahead with this. > > opensync was uploaded and has now built everywhere; I've approved it so > it should enter testing in the next britney run. > > The -file and -evolution2 plugins are in NEW as of a few hours ago. Are > there any tpu uploads remaining? I just checked, and all the other ones are in unstable. Except for the syncml-plugin/libsyncml, but as I said before, the current libsyncml in testing is not working with the 0.22 syncml-plugin, and reverting this is not worth the effort - also now that I believe syncevolution gets fixed up for squeeze. The question is which packages to transition from unstable, at least multisync0.90, libopensync-plugin-python are essential and libopensync-plugin-kdepim, barry and synce-sync-engine would make sense (although I do not maintain the latter two). I don't see any RC bugs on them except for the 0.22 vs. 0.39 related ones. Other plugins (like libopensync-plugin-gpe, libopensync-plugin-google-calendar etc. would be nice, but I am not sure what the release team's feeling are here. Regards, Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101107214715.ga8...@nighthawk.chemicalconnection.dyndns.org
Re: advice for syncevolution in squeeze
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 22:39 -0300, David Bremner wrote: > On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 13:46:58 +0200, Patrick Ohly > wrote: > > > If 1.0 + bug fixes is not acceptable for Debian Squeeze, then I suggest > > that direct synchronization with phones gets disabled entirely in the > > Debian Squeeze build by turning off Bluetooth support. Users who want > > that need to find a backport of SyncEvolution. > > This is of course easy to do. And I don't mind doing the backport. Was this feature not present in beta 2, or just not useful then? > > FWIW, I still think that 1.0 + bug fixes is the better choice for > > Squeeze. It has been in use for a while now and arguably is better than > > beta 2, with no known regressions whatsoever. > > I'm also willing to do this if the release team approves it. I'm not sure I'm going to like the answer, given the commit count you mention below, but how large is the diff between what's currently in squeeze and the proposed 1.0 packages? > One thing I > (belatedly) realized is that we need to think about not only the changes > introduced by a new upstream version of syncevolution (some 360 commits > between 1.0beta2 and 1.0, about 80 of these are translations) but also > in libsynthesis (another 77 commits). Would that be 3.4.0.6+ds4-1, which is currently in experimental? (The changelog suggests that +ds2-1 might be a more sensible comparison point, but that doesn't appear to have ever been in the archive, so isn't as easy to diff against). Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1289167517.27850.7588.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#602736: marked as done (RM: funguloids/1.06-8)
Your message dated Sun, 07 Nov 2010 23:03:26 +0100 with message-id <4cd7222e.9040...@dogguy.org> and subject line Re: Bug#602736: RM: funguloids/1.06-8 has caused the Debian Bug report #602736, regarding RM: funguloids/1.06-8 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 602736: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602736 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Please remove funguloids. It needs more work post-Squeeze to bring it in shape (adapting to current OGRE, splitting off the arch-indep game data, making Cg optional and move it to main). Cheers, Moritz -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=C, lc_ctype=de_de.iso-8859...@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 11/07/2010 06:01 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: rm > > Please remove funguloids. It needs more work post-Squeeze to bring it > in shape (adapting to current OGRE, splitting off the arch-indep game > data, making Cg optional and move it to main). > Removal hint added. Thanks for your work, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ --- End Message ---
Re: sendmail 8.1.4.4-1(was: Re: Richard A Nelson (Rick) MIA)
On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 12:52:06PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 08:09 +0100, Harald Jenny wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 04:48:08PM -0700, Richard A Nelson wrote: > > > On Mon, 1 Nov 2010, Harald Jenny wrote: > > > >Could you give us a quick overview what the current state of > > > >packaging sendmail and libmilter is? Do you need any help? Is there a > > > >chance to > > > >get this new version still into Squeeze (release team?) or should we > > > >rather > > > >focus on backporting the necessary changes to 8.14.3? As the libmilter > > > >problem > > > >renders a class of applications unreliable this should IMHO really be > > > >classified as RC bug. > [...] > > > sendmail_8.14.4-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable > [...] > > > So, barring bugs, it should hit testing soon > > > > Thanks - and I hope the release team will allow this transition to take > > place. Hi Adam > > Which libmilter problem are you referring to? There don't appear to be > any RC bugs closed by the upload. Well I tried to change bug http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=527862 to severity grave as I thought this would make this a release-critical bug but failed to do so, please see the last mail in the thread before the solved message (not enough experience with bugs.debian.org yet). > > With a little massaging of the diff (tarball-in-tarball with versioned > directory names sucks), I can get down to > > 146 files changed, 2092 insertions(+), 999 deletions(-) > > but that's still quite large for an update at this point. :-/ I know this but the above mentioned bug make almost any software depending on libmilter unusable (or at least unstable) and as this release was uploaded to unstable already it won't be possible to only get the important changes for libmilter in an updated 8.14.3 version. > > Regards, > > Adam Kind regards Harald > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: > http://lists.debian.org/1289134326.27850.6045.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101107220537.gb3...@harald-has.a-little-linux-box.at
one project packages twice (u-boot and uboot-mkimage)
Hi, I just want to let you know that the uboot-mkimage source package contains a stripped version the u-boot source package and both packages have the same functionality. I filed the series bug #602778 [1]. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602778 -- Benjamin Drung Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: please unblock package iceweasel-l10n for squeeze
>> iceweasel 3.5.15 has gone to testing, again :) Could You unblock its >> iceweasel-l10n again? >> MD> Unblocked. MD> Please file a bug against release.debian.org with appropriate usertags MD> set for future unblock requests. Yes, sorry for annoyance, thanks! -- ... mpd is off . ''`. Dmitry E. Oboukhov : :’ : email: un...@debian.org jabber://un...@uvw.ru `. `~’ GPGKey: 1024D / F8E26537 2006-11-21 `- 1B23 D4F8 8EC0 D902 0555 E438 AB8C 00CF F8E2 6537 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Please consider unblocking boxbackup_0.11~rc3~r2502-4
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 22:03:41 (CEST), Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > On 10/22/2010 08:50 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote: >> >> I have to admit that I noticed too late that the rc3 version didn't >> make it to testing because of the missing build; I just assumed rc3 >> was already in and don't really remember what exactly changed. >> However, I do remember (several) FTBFS fixes and rather conservative >> upstream changes. I do know that the current binary works, but in >> case we need to include some security update after release, I fear >> we won't be able to offer updated packages. >> > > We are currently really not able to accept rc3 in Squeeze because rc3 > never migrated (since April *2009*). If you are not able to provide > security support for it during Squeeze's lifetime, the single action we > are able to perform is adding a removal hint for it. I've spoken to upstream, and they are (of course) also rather unhappy about it. Still, since boxackup did work in lenny and I don't want these users to be left in the cold, I've uploaded a new package with a minimal fix for #601506. diff -u boxbackup-0.11~rc2/debian/changelog boxbackup-0.11~rc2/debian/changelog --- boxbackup-0.11~rc2/debian/changelog +++ boxbackup-0.11~rc2/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +boxbackup (0.11~rc2-7) testing; urgency=low + + * bin/bbstored/bbstored-certs: reduce root CA expiration date to avoid +Y2k38 overflow. Thanks to Clint Adams for +reporting it. Closes: #601506 + + -- Reinhard Tartler Fri, 05 Nov 2010 17:09:17 +0100 + boxbackup (0.11~rc2-6) unstable; urgency=low * Fix shell scripting in the debconf interaction code of the package's only in patch2: unchanged: --- boxbackup-0.11~rc2.orig/bin/bbstored/bbstored-certs.in +++ boxbackup-0.11~rc2/bin/bbstored/bbstored-certs.in @@ -2,10 +2,10 @@ use strict; # validity period for root certificates -- default is a very long time -my $root_sign_period = '1'; +my $root_sign_period = '5000'; # but less so for client certificates -my $sign_period = '5000'; +my $sign_period = '3000'; # check and get command line parameters if($#ARGV < 1) Please approve for squeeze. -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/8762w847mk@faui44a.informatik.uni-erlangen.de
Re: libgd2-noxpm propagation to Debian testing
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 07:38:03AM +0100, Harald Jenny wrote: sorry for being noisy but I wanted to ask if you plan to issue a freeze exception for version 2.0.36~rc1~dfsg-5 of libgd2 as the noxpm fix would be really usefull for installation on servers. Whoops, yeah - thanks for the reminder. @Release team: Please consider apply a freeze exception for libgd2, as the version currently in testing has a build flaw causing the noxpm variant to be linked against libxpm as well. Kind regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature
