date:20100912

Le samedi 11 septembre 2010 à 19:26 +0200, Julien Cristau a écrit : 
> +++ epiphany-browser-2.30.5/data/epiphany-2.29.pc   2010-08-30 
> 22:55:34.0 +
> 
> that file shouldn't be in the tarball.

I can confirm that it is correctly regenerated during the build, so this
is harmless (although a bug indeed).

> +++ epiphany-browser-2.30.5/data/org.gnome.Epiphany.service 2010-08-30 
> 22:58:52.0 +
> 
> same.

Ditto.

> +   cd debian/epiphany-browser-data/usr/share/applications/ \
> +   && mv epiphany.desktop epiphany-browser.desktop
> 
> is this what made epiphany disappear from my panel?

Most probably.

>   any way we can avoid that?

We could by shipping two desktop files, with one of them having
NoDisplay=true added. Do you want me to add this change? I’m afraid it’s
the kind of thing we will have to keep forever if we do.

> [ignoring doc/reference/ changes]
> 
> +  gboolean inspector_attached;
>guint is_setting_zoom : 1;
> 
> kind of weird to be mixing Booleans as gboolean and as 1-bit bitfield.

I agree using the bitfield is a bug, but it predates this change.

> gtk_window_set_default_size (GTK_WINDOW (embed->priv->inspector_window),
> -   600, 400);
> +   800, 600);
> 
> Not quite convinced... 600 pixels high on a netbook means part of it
> will be off-screen, if you take into account the panel and window
> decorations?  Why is the size static anyway...

Apparently the contents don’t fit in a 400 pixels window:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=626625

As for the default size being static, it is generally necessary for
windows that have a large area for which you cannot compute the size.
Which is precisely the case of the inspector, which is not even made of
GTK+ widgets.

> There's a changelog entry saying 'use cairo_fill instead of
> cairo_paint', yet lib/widgets/ephy-spinner.c replaced gdk_draw_pixbuf
> with cairo_paint?

The changelog entry you are referring to is fixing a typo. The large
change was named: “use cairo for drawing widgets”.

> +Split EphyNavigationAction in one abstract class and two subclasses
> 
> that one is pretty huge, I won't be reviewing this part.

Do you want me to revert this commit?
Note that it fixes a real bug:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=539716

-- 
 .''`.  Josselin Mouette
: :' :
`. `'  “If you behave this way because you are blackmailed by someone,
  `-[…] I will see what I can do for you.”  -- Jörg Schilling


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#596093: unblock: dmz-cursor-theme/0.4.2

Le samedi 11 septembre 2010 à 17:50 +0200, Julien Cristau a écrit : 
> > The really important changes are:
> >   * DFSG-conformance: the source package didn’t include the PNG
> > sources nor the SVG that was used to generate them.
> >   * Priority bump for DMZ-White, to avoid using oxygen (with is very
> > un-neutral) as the default when both KDE and GNOME are
> > installed.
> > 
> debian/copyright seems to be missing the GPL2 from renderpngs.py?

Indeed, thanks for noticing. This is fixed in the SVN, do you want me to
upload before it migrates to testing?

Cheers,
-- 
 .''`.  Josselin Mouette
: :' :
`. `'  “If you behave this way because you are blackmailed by someone,
  `-[…] I will see what I can do for you.”  -- Jörg Schilling


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Pre-approval of python-liblas/1.2.1-2 upload

2010-09-12 Thread David Paleino

Hello RT,
I prepared an upload for python-liblas, version 1.2.1-2, targetted at Squeeze.
This upload fixes an RC bug (#595603), and another one which is
"minor" (#595608, but the fix is really easy, and they're really almost the
same bug).

The patch I want to upload is:

http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/pkg-grass/packages/python-liblas/trunk/debian/patches/00-fix_library_search.patch?view=markup

I'll wait a reply before uploading to sid.

Thank you,
David

-- 
 . ''`.   Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
 : :'  : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
 `. `'`  GPG: 1392B174 | http://deb.li/dapal
   `-   2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#596093: unblock: dmz-cursor-theme/0.4.2

On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 10:43:42 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:

> Le samedi 11 septembre 2010 à 17:50 +0200, Julien Cristau a écrit : 
> > > The really important changes are:
> > >   * DFSG-conformance: the source package didn’t include the PNG
> > > sources nor the SVG that was used to generate them.
> > >   * Priority bump for DMZ-White, to avoid using oxygen (with is very
> > > un-neutral) as the default when both KDE and GNOME are
> > > installed.
> > > 
> > debian/copyright seems to be missing the GPL2 from renderpngs.py?
> 
> Indeed, thanks for noticing. This is fixed in the SVN, do you want me to
> upload before it migrates to testing?
> 
I think including this in the next upload is good enough.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#596094: unblock: epiphany-browser/2.30.5-1

On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 10:35:19 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:

> Le samedi 11 septembre 2010 à 19:26 +0200, Julien Cristau a écrit : 
> > +   cd debian/epiphany-browser-data/usr/share/applications/ \
> > +   && mv epiphany.desktop epiphany-browser.desktop
> > 
> > is this what made epiphany disappear from my panel?
> 
> Most probably.
> 
> >   any way we can avoid that?
> 
> We could by shipping two desktop files, with one of them having
> NoDisplay=true added. Do you want me to add this change? I’m afraid it’s
> the kind of thing we will have to keep forever if we do.
> 
How is the upgrade from lenny supposed to work?  AFAICT lenny has a
epiphany-gecko.desktop file instead?

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#596300: unblock: libunistring/0.9.3-3

On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 22:44:38 +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote:

> Julien Cristau  wrote:
> 
> > What important bugs does 0.9.3 fix compared to 0.9.1 (the upstream NEWS
> > doesn't really sound like these are critical fixes, afaict)?
> 
> Fixes broken headers; nothing can build against 0.9.1. See #595875.
> 
Can we get a minimal fix for that issue, without most of the other
changes?  The current diff from testing is
 1175 files changed, 69286 insertions(+), 45312 deletions(-)
and I'm not looking forward to reviewing that :/

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#596194: marked as done (Freeze exception for ppl 0.10.2-8)

Your message dated Sun, 12 Sep 2010 12:41:27 +0200
with message-id <20100912104127.gx3...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#596194: Freeze exception for ppl 0.10.2-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #596194,
regarding Freeze exception for ppl 0.10.2-8
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)

-- 
596194: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596194
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org

Hi release team,

Please grant a freeze exception for ppl, version 0.10.2-8, which is now built
on all architectures. The changelog entries read as follows (also including
0.10.2-7 as that never entered testing):

ppl (0.10.2-8) unstable; urgency=low

  * Ignore testsuite failures on armel as these seem to be caused by
miscompilation, see #593324.
  * No more swi-prolog on mips, don't build PPL Prolog interface on mips.
Closes: #593393.

 -- Michael Tautschnig   Mon, 06 Sep 2010 12:31:59 +0200

ppl (0.10.2-7) unstable; urgency=low

  * Drop xpdf-utils from build depends to fix FTBFS. Closes: #591155.
  * Bumped Standars-Version to 3.9.1 (no changes).
  * Specifically require automake1.10 as we modify some Makefile.am.
  * swi-prolog now ships executable linker as swipl-ld.

 -- Michael Tautschnig   Sun, 01 Aug 2010 12:22:05 +0200

Furthermore, any version later than 0.10.2-7 also fixes #595884, which is an
FTBFS in squeeze because the swi-prolog linker has been renamed (see last
changelog entry line above).

Please let me know if you need further information.

Thanks a lot for all your work,
Michael

pgpfBNln9J47h.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 09:17:41 +0200, Michael Tautschnig wrote:

> > On Thu, Sep  9, 2010 at 08:15:17 +0200, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> > 
> > > ppl (0.10.2-8) unstable; urgency=low
> > > 
> > >   * Ignore testsuite failures on armel as these seem to be caused by
> > > miscompilation, see #593324.
> > >   * No more swi-prolog on mips, don't build PPL Prolog interface on mips.
> > > Closes: #593393.
> > > 
> > Has the removal of the old mips binary been requested from ftpmaster?
> > 
> 
> Yes, it's #596501 :-) Thanks a lot for reminding me!
> 
Unblocked.  Should migrate in 5 days or when the mips libppl-swi is gone,
whichever happens last.

Cheers,
Julien

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---

Bug#596300: unblock: libunistring/0.9.3-3

2010-09-12 Thread Julien BLACHE

Julien Cristau  wrote:

Hi,

>> Fixes broken headers; nothing can build against 0.9.1. See #595875.
> 
> Can we get a minimal fix for that issue, without most of the other
> changes?  The current diff from testing is
>  1175 files changed, 69286 insertions(+), 45312 deletions(-)
> and I'm not looking forward to reviewing that :/

It's a gnulib update you're seeing, as has been pointed out
previously. The fix is entangled in the update IIRC.

0.9.3 is better than 0.9.1 anyway and spent quite some time in unstable
already; it only did not make it to Squeeze due to the broken MIPS
toolchain.

JB.

-- 
 Julien BLACHE   |  Debian, because code matters more 
 Debian & GNU/Linux Developer|   
 Public key available on  - KeyID: F5D6 5169 
 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169 



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87iq2bqlfr@sonic.technologeek.org

Bug#595609: unblock: mailgraph/1.14-3

2010-09-12 Thread Julien Valroff

Hi,

Le lundi 06 sept. 2010 à 20:23:42 (+0200), Julien Cristau a écrit :
> Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2010 20:23:42 +0200
> From: Julien Cristau 
> To: Christian PERRIER , 595...@bugs.debian.org
> Cc: Julien Valroff 
> Subject: Re: Bug#595609: unblock: mailgraph/1.14-3
> 
> On Sun, Sep  5, 2010 at 15:13:10 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> 
> > Julien (Cristau), what if Julien V. does this? Would the package be OK
> > for an unblock?
> > 
> I'm just going through the changelog, not looking at the actual changes:
[...] 
> The rest would depend on the specifics, but basically for anything
> that's not necessary to fix an important bug (or
> translation/documentation updates) it's too late.

Then, I propose to integrate latest translation updates to the version 
currently in testing (1.14-1.4), and upload a version to unstable re-
integrating changes made by Christian in his last 2 NMU's.

How should I number the updated 1.14-1.4? Should it be uploaded to
testing-proposed-updates, am I right?

Cheers,
Julien

-- 
Julien Valroff 
http://www.kirya.net
GPG key: 1024D/9F71D449
17F4 93D8 746F F011 B845  9F91 210B F2AB 9F71 D449


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Please unblock krb5-auth-dialog 0.16-4

2010-09-12 Thread Guido Günther

Hi,
please unblock krb5-auth-dialog. The only remaining change over 0.16-2
is one line a fix in the desktop file to unconditionally start
krb5-auth-dialog to make life easier for mobile systems (#582497).

The other change in 0.16-3 broke translations and so I reverted it in
-4.
Cheers,
 -- Guido


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100912110552.ga5...@bogon.sigxcpu.org

Bug#595720: future unblock: libdbm-deep-perl/2.0002-1

On Mon, 2010-09-06 at 12:24 +0900, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> libdbm-deep-perl can corrupt the database if too many transactions are
> started[1].  This was fixed upstream in version 2.0002.  There is
> another minor change in behavior in 2.0001, but this should not affect
> Debian (the only rdep, libipc-pubsub-perl, seems not to use this
> feature).
>
> The debdiff from the version currently in testing to the proposed upload
> is attached.  Should we go ahead with the upload? (Note that 2.0001 is
> already in unstable.)

Please go ahead, and let us know once the package has been accepted.

> PS: Please Cc: debian-p...@lists.debian.org in replies.

Done.

Regards,

Adam



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1284290206.22294.8186.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net

Bug#596000: marked as done (unblock: asterisk/1:1.6.2.9-2)

Your message dated Sun, 12 Sep 2010 12:19:21 +0100
with message-id 
<1284290361.22294.8198.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#596000: unblock: asterisk/1:1.6.2.9-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #596000,
regarding unblock: asterisk/1:1.6.2.9-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)

-- 
596000: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596000
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception

unblock asterisk/1:1.6.2.9-2

Please unblock asterisk. It fixes #594190 (RC) and #589736 (bending the 
rules a bit, severity: normal but really really trivial, hope it's OK).

The other changes are documentation changes (spelling, typos and manpage 
fixes) plus the removal of three useless binaries.

The full changelog is:

 [ Tzafrir Cohen ]
 * Bump Standards version to 3.9.0 (no change needed).
 * rtcp_cli_fix: Backport a silly CLI parsing issue. (Closes: #589736)
 * Patch typos: fix a few typos in the source.
 * Patch man_hyphen: fix hyphen/minus issues in man pages.
 * Remove useless binaries aelparse, conf2ael and muted.

 [ Faidon Liambotis ]
 * Change the way that we read include files, to accommodate for changes
   in GCC 4.4. Taken from upstream's SVN, thanks to Peter Allgeyer for
   the patch and Stefan Bauer for preparing an upload. (Closes: #594190)
 * Set urgency high for a squeeze-targetted RC bug-fixing upload.

Regards,
Faidon

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 22:50 +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
> unblock asterisk/1:1.6.2.9-2
> 
> Please unblock asterisk. It fixes #594190 (RC) and #589736 (bending the 
> rules a bit, severity: normal but really really trivial, hope it's OK).
> 
> The other changes are documentation changes (spelling, typos and manpage 
> fixes) plus the removal of three useless binaries.

Unblocked by Luk.

Regards,

Adam

--- End Message ---

Re: Gnash 0.8.8 has just been released - Asking for an exception to the freeze

On Sat, 2010-08-28 at 21:49 +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> I take it that no one has any problems with me uploading latest gnash
> to sid. I'll probably do that tomorrow and ask for an exception to the
> freeze.

0.8.8-2 was unblocked by Luk, and migrated this morning.

Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1284290519.22294.8215.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net

Re: djvulibre exception request

On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 08:32:31 +0100, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote:

> Per req, pushed up v -3 in the old source format.
> Might help a little, but there are still a lot of false positive
> changes listed in the diff due to differential CVS keyword expansion.
> This is the horror of CVS keywords I guess.
> 
Thanks, unblocked.  I'm not seeing where the shlibs bump came from,
though?  dh_makeshlibs -V is not really a good thing to do, it's better
to actually track ABI changes...

Also note that the tools/tiff2pdf.c change is fixing an alignment issue
by introducing an aliasing one.  You could avoid both with something
like:

char fileidbuf[16];
int foo;

for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
  foo = rand();
  memcpy(&fileidbuf[4*i], &foo, 4);
}

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: Pre-approval of python-liblas/1.2.1-2 upload

On Sun, 2010-09-12 at 10:56 +0200, David Paleino wrote:
> I prepared an upload for python-liblas, version 1.2.1-2, targetted at Squeeze.
> This upload fixes an RC bug (#595603), and another one which is
> "minor" (#595608, but the fix is really easy, and they're really almost the
> same bug).

Please go ahead, and let us know once the package has been accepted.

Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1284290774.22294.8236.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net

Bug#595609: unblock: mailgraph/1.14-3

2010-09-12 Thread Christian PERRIER

Quoting Julien Valroff (jul...@kirya.net):

> How should I number the updated 1.14-1.4? Should it be uploaded to
> testing-proposed-updates, am I right?

I'd say 1.14-1.4squeeze1 and, yes, upload to t-p-u (let's have
confirmation from Julien Cristau, though)




signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: djvulibre exception request

2010-09-12 Thread Barak A. Pearlmutter

> ... unblocked ...

Thanks!  (Especially so quickly, under the late circumstances, with a
non-leaf solib package.)

Your other points are noted: will check up on them, and get back
off-list since they are not release related.

--Barak.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1oulgc-iy...@corti

Re: Gnash 0.8.8 has just been released - Asking for an exception to the freeze

2010-09-12 Thread Gabriele Giacone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 09/12/2010 01:21 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> 0.8.8-2 was unblocked by Luk, and migrated this morning.

Good, in the meanwhile we have produced -3 and -4 both in experimental:
- -3 mainly manages swfdec transition (removed from Debian) and due to
this it was in NEW and it's just been accepted; -4 fixes -3 transition
and renames mozilla-plugin-gnash to browser-plugin-gnash according to
[1,2]. Unfortunately due to this rename, it's in NEW again.
Install System Team has already solved [3] so AFAIU when tasksel will be
unblocked, install process will look for browser-plugin-gnash which
doesn't exist yet.

CC'ed ftpmasters: as already explained, please accept -4 so we'll be
able to upload -5 in unstable and come back to RMs asking for its
unblock, the last one.

Thank you all for your time and keep up the good work.
Cheers,
Gabriele

[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2010/04/msg00404.html
[2] http://www.doodle.com/guafbbhipwskzr8a
[3] http://bugs.debian.org/595325
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkyMxaUACgkQp3cdCbVcnCvCNgCg3D2G0YARXtJDm3UspAx45woK
HNcAn2o5hdvxOi6HL6UBD7t1bs2r2fDr
=Bjj8
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c8cc5ba.9090...@gmail.com

Re: Re: Bug#592900: Updating system-config-printer

2010-09-12 Thread Guido Günther

Hi David,
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 10:54:11PM +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote:
[..snip..]
> You will (maybe) see a bunch of lines looking like this one:
> 
> Broken python-cupshelpers:amd64 Stört on python-cupsutils [ amd64 ] <
> 1.0.0-6 > ( python ) (< 1.2.3)
>   Considering python-cupsutils:amd64 2 as a solution to
> python-cupshelpers:amd64 1
>   Holding Back python-cupshelpers:amd64 rather than change
> python-cupsutils:amd64
> 
> Thats the key part of the problem resolving:
> Packages want python-cupshelpers and python-cupsutils installed,
> but in their candidate version they can't co-exist on the system
> so APT needs to decide which package is more important than the other.
> 
> You can see this decision in line 2: the score is 2 vs. 1 in this case.
> As you can see here, python-cupsutils seems to be more important (2)
> than python-cupshelpers (1) and therefore APT will retreat from upgrading
> so it can keep both packages and everybody (expect you in this case)
> is happy as nothing is broken.
Many thanks for the explanation! That helped a lot to track down the
problem. Removing the Breaks and Replaces python-cupsutils from
python-cupshelpers lets the upgrade work for me as expected: 

The following packages will be REMOVED:
  hal-cups-utils
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  cups-pk-helper python-cupshelpers system-config-printer-udev
The following packages will be upgraded:

Since we don't have any file conflicts we simply let the autoremove
handle the removal of python-cupsutils. Would this be an acceptable
solution? If so I'd be happy to upload a new version.
Cheers,
 -- Guido


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100912122834.ga13...@bogon.sigxcpu.org

Re: Bug#595479: Please unblock: openmotif/2.3.3-4

2010-09-12 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff

On 2010-09-11, Julien Cristau  wrote:
>
> --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> On Wed, Sep  8, 2010 at 08:43:08 +0200, Stefan Bauer wrote:
>
>> Am 04.09.2010 18:13, Adam D. Barratt schrieb:
>> > On Sat, 2010-09-04 at 12:08 +0200, Stefan Bauer wrote:
>> >> Please add another freeze exception. The package would have been in
>> >> testing already but the buldd's are too busy. I'm waiting since 19. of
>> >> august for the appropriate builds.
>> >=20
>> > out of date on hppa: libmotif-dev, libmotif3, motif-clients (from 2=
>=2E2.3-4)
>> > out of date on ia64: libmotif-dev, libmotif4, motif-clients (from 2=
>=2E3.3-2)
>> > out of date on mips: libmotif-dev, libmotif3, motif-clients (from 2=
>=2E2.3-4)
>> > out of date on mipsel: libmotif-dev, libmotif3, motif-clients (from=
>  2.2.3-4)
>> >=20
>> > Those missing builds all need resolving before the package will migrate.
>> >=20
>> > hppa does not have non-free auto-builders right now; ia64 is now built
>> > and mipsel has hit #519006 (I would be astonished if mips does not also
>> > do so).
>>=20
>> Build Problems on mips are now fixed. Please add an unblock exeption
>> for this package to enter testing.
>>=20
>> This package is really required to run the citrix client.
>>=20
> It's still missing an hppa build.  Can you do that on the porterbox?

Can you please clarify what the status of hppa no longer being a Squeeze 
release 
architecture means in practice:

- Are missing/outdated hppa builds relevant for testing migration?
- Should hppa-specific bugs be demoted to non-RC severity?

Cheers,
Moritz


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/slrni8pinq.2nn@inutil.org

Bug#596094: unblock: epiphany-browser/2.30.5-1

Le dimanche 12 septembre 2010 à 12:36 +0200, Julien Cristau a écrit : 
> > We could by shipping two desktop files, with one of them having
> > NoDisplay=true added. Do you want me to add this change? I’m afraid it’s
> > the kind of thing we will have to keep forever if we do.
> > 
> How is the upgrade from lenny supposed to work?  AFAICT lenny has a
> epiphany-gecko.desktop file instead?

The one without NoDisplay=true (which is the one people dragged from the
menus to the panel or desktop) was epiphany.desktop.

Anyway I just noticed that the panel’s default setup still references
epiphany.desktop, so this breaks new installations too. 

I think I’m going to revert this change for now, since we shouldn’t be
shipping gnome-shell in squeeze (this will require a gnome-session
upload dropping gnome3-session to t-p-u, BTW). Anyway gnome-shell should
be fixed to use the name set by g_set_prgname instead of the binary
name.

Cheers,
-- 
 .''`.  Josselin Mouette
: :' :
`. `'  “If you behave this way because you are blackmailed by someone,
  `-[…] I will see what I can do for you.”  -- Jörg Schilling


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Re: Bug#592900: Updating system-config-printer

On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 14:28:34 +0200, Guido Günther wrote:

> Since we don't have any file conflicts we simply let the autoremove
> handle the removal of python-cupsutils. Would this be an acceptable
> solution? If so I'd be happy to upload a new version.

That sounds good to me.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#595720: future unblock: libdbm-deep-perl/2.0002-1

2010-09-12 Thread gregor herrmann

On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 12:16:45 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:

> On Mon, 2010-09-06 at 12:24 +0900, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> > libdbm-deep-perl can corrupt the database if too many transactions are
> > started[1].  This was fixed upstream in version 2.0002.  There is
> > another minor change in behavior in 2.0001, but this should not affect
> > Debian (the only rdep, libipc-pubsub-perl, seems not to use this
> > feature).
> Please go ahead, and let us know once the package has been accepted.

Thanks; uploaded & accepted.

Cheers,
gregor

-- 
 .''`.   http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG key IDs: 0x8649AA06, 0x00F3CFE4
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'   Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-NP: Simply Red: Thrill Me


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: upcoming upload of collectd 4.10.1-2

2010-09-12 Thread Sebastian Harl

Hi,

On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 12:23:14PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 09:38:47PM +0200, Sebastian Harl wrote:
> > Is it fine for you that I upload the package to t-p-u, even though it
> > contains fixes for non-RC bugs as well or would you rather like me to
> > revert those changes? The fixes for the non-RC bugs are all rather
> > small.
> 
> You can go ahead with the package as-is.

Great :-) I've uploaded 4.10.1-2 to unstable (to get a higher version
number than in testing, which is needed to ensure testing < t-p-u <
unstable) and changed the version for t-p-u to 4.10.1-1+squeeze1.

Cheers,
Sebastian

-- 
Sebastian "tokkee" Harl +++ GnuPG-ID: 0x8501C7FC +++ http://tokkee.org/

Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. -- Benjamin Franklin

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: Pre-approval of python-liblas/1.2.1-2 upload

2010-09-12 Thread David Paleino

On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 12:26:14 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:

> On Sun, 2010-09-12 at 10:56 +0200, David Paleino wrote:
> > I prepared an upload for python-liblas, version 1.2.1-2, targetted at
> > Squeeze. This upload fixes an RC bug (#595603), and another one which is
> > "minor" (#595608, but the fix is really easy, and they're really almost the
> > same bug).
> 
> Please go ahead, and let us know once the package has been accepted.

Accepted.

Thank you,
David

-- 
 . ''`.   Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
 : :'  : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
 `. `'`  GPG: 1392B174 | http://deb.li/dapal
   `-   2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#595720: marked as done (future unblock: libdbm-deep-perl/2.0002-1)

Your message dated Sun, 12 Sep 2010 16:06:16 +0100
with message-id 
<1284303977.22294.9337.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#595720: future unblock: libdbm-deep-perl/2.0002-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #595720,
regarding future unblock: libdbm-deep-perl/2.0002-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
595720: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=595720
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

libdbm-deep-perl can corrupt the database if too many transactions are
started[1].  This was fixed upstream in version 2.0002.  There is
another minor change in behavior in 2.0001, but this should not affect
Debian (the only rdep, libipc-pubsub-perl, seems not to use this
feature).

The debdiff from the version currently in testing to the proposed upload
is attached.  Should we go ahead with the upload? (Note that 2.0001 is
already in unstable.)

Regards,
Ansgar

PS: Please Cc: debian-p...@lists.debian.org in replies.

[1] 
Index: debian/control
===
--- debian/control	(.../tags/libdbm-deep-perl/2.-1)	(revision 62350)
+++ debian/control	(.../trunk/libdbm-deep-perl)	(revision 62350)
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 Source: libdbm-deep-perl
 Section: perl
 Priority: optional
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7.3.7~)
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 8)
 Build-Depends-Indep: perl, libtest-deep-perl (>= 0.095), 
  libtest-exception-perl (>= 0.21), libtest-warn-perl,
  libio-stringy-perl, libfilehandle-fmode-perl, libtest-pod-coverage-perl,
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
 Uploaders: AGOSTINI Yves ,
  gregor herrmann ,
  Ansgar Burchardt 
-Standards-Version: 3.9.0
+Standards-Version: 3.9.1
 Homepage: http://search.cpan.org/dist/DBM-Deep/
 Vcs-Svn: svn://svn.debian.org/pkg-perl/trunk/libdbm-deep-perl/
 Vcs-Browser: http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/pkg-perl/trunk/libdbm-deep-perl/
Index: debian/compat
===
--- debian/compat	(.../tags/libdbm-deep-perl/2.-1)	(revision 62350)
+++ debian/compat	(.../trunk/libdbm-deep-perl)	(revision 62350)
@@ -1 +1 @@
-7
+8
Index: debian/changelog
===
--- debian/changelog	(.../tags/libdbm-deep-perl/2.-1)	(revision 62350)
+++ debian/changelog	(.../trunk/libdbm-deep-perl)	(revision 62350)
@@ -1,3 +1,25 @@
+libdbm-deep-perl (2.0002-1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * New upstream release.
++ Errors out instead of corrupting the database when starting too many
+  transactions.
+  * debian/copyright: Refer to "Debian systems" instead of "Debian GNU/Linux
+systems".
+
+ -- Ansgar Burchardt   Mon, 06 Sep 2010 12:05:09 +0900
+
+libdbm-deep-perl (2.0001-1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * New upstream release.
+  * Use debhelper compat level 8; no longer pass --buildsystem=perl_build in
+debian/rules as this is now selected by default.
+  * debian/rules: Remove DBM::Deep::ConfigData module that gets generated by
+Module::Build.
+  * debian/copyright: Refer to /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-1.
+  * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.1.
+
+ -- Ansgar Burchardt   Wed, 25 Aug 2010 22:12:50 +0900
+
 libdbm-deep-perl (2.-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   [ Ansgar Burchardt ]
Index: debian/copyright
===
--- debian/copyright	(.../tags/libdbm-deep-perl/2.-1)	(revision 62350)
+++ debian/copyright	(.../trunk/libdbm-deep-perl)	(revision 62350)
@@ -18,8 +18,8 @@
  This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
  it under the terms of the Artistic License, which comes with Perl.
  .
- On Debian GNU/Linux systems, the complete text of the Artistic License
- can be found in `/usr/share/common-licenses/Artistic'
+ On Debian systems, the complete text of the Artistic License can be
+ found in `/usr/share/common-licenses/Artistic'.
 
 License: GPL-1+
  This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
@@ -27,5 +27,5 @@
  the Free Software Foundation; either version 1, or (at your option)
  any later version.
  .
- On Debian GNU/Linux systems, the complete text of the GNU General
- Public License can be found in `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL'
+ On Debian systems, the complete text of version 1 of the GNU General
+ Public License can be found in `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-1'.
Index: debian/rules

Re: Please unblock gtk-vnc 0.4.1-3

On Sun, 2010-09-12 at 00:47 +0200, Laurent Léonard wrote:
> Please unblock gtk-vnc 0.4.1-3. I just added an upstream patch to fix a bug 
> that was causing memory corruption and then a crash. This bug is described in 
> #596447.

Unblocked.

Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1284304726.22294.9404.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net

Bug#596549: unblock: phenny/2~hg28-2

2010-09-12 Thread Piotr Ożarowski

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception

Please unblock package phenny

it fixes release critical bug (#596311)

unblock phenny/2~hg28-2

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=pl_PL.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
-- 
mail to -announce 6 months before Debian freeze FTW!



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100912150032.ga31...@piotro.eu

Re: Bug#593544: gnucash: Upgrade from Debian Lenny looses Online Banking (AqBanking) settings

2010-09-12 Thread Micha Lenk

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Julien,

Julien Cristau schrieb:
> Micha, could you upload gnucash 2.2.9-7~squeeze1 (or a similar version)
> to t-p-u?

Will do as soon as I've sorted things out piled up during two weeks of
vacation (should happen this week).

Regards,
Micha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkyM7BQACgkQWN0/4pnhQbTPyACfc6r1iTdooGMnBvLZaWuEIEyk
OE8AoLHV4eSbcFbx5fFUf1Q96+Bil+cm
=MXJL
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c8cec1f.7000...@debian.org

Bug #566650: Please unblock dtc 0.32.2-1

2010-09-12 Thread Thomas Goirand

Dear Release Team,

It's with all my heart that I'm writing to the RT today. I've been
working on DTC 0.32 for years, it's both my company flagship software
that feeds me every day, and what pushed me to work inside Debian and do
all my packaging work. I know it can't be a technical point, but a
refusal would both make me feel very sad (that Debian refuses 1 year of
commits and hard work), and have huge consequence on my business as
well. So please consider carefully what's below.

I have clearly understood the meaning of the testing frozen state, and I
clearly understand that I'm asking here to break one of the strongest
rules we have in Debian, which is to freeze things before a release.
However, I have my reasons to ask for such unblock. There are valid
points that are pushing me to write this today.

- First of all, we have have been in functionality freeze in DTC since
the beginning of last summer. This new version has only receive lots of
bug fixes since, and no new functionalities.

- I haven't uploaded the new release to SID before, because I wanted to
upload only something that was ready and fixed fully. I'd think that
saying it was the wrong thing to do, and that I should have leave a
problematic version in SID well in advance and ask for multiple bug-fix
unblock, just in order to have a chance to get it into Squeeze, wouldn't
be the good approach, IMHO.

- I have missed the deadline only for few days (12 days, right?). Before
that, the RT had more relaxed rules since the debconf10 announcement,
which was a surprise for some.

- I've been quite busy repairing other packages and focussed on DTC's
dependencies first (dkimproxy, extplorer, libdbi, editarea, mysqmail,
nusoap, many php-* pear packages, xen-qemu-dm, etc.), as I thought that
was the correct order to do things. All this takes time, and I think
I've been rushing to do all this too much already, with multiple
consequences, in order to meet the deadline. Telling me that I wasn't
fast enough and giving even more pressure wouldn't be the good approach,
IMHO. If the release team tells me that I should calm down and that I
should take more time to fix things correctly, and that they will be
accepted, I believe I'll be sending packages with better quality in
the future (I will try anyway).

- PHP 5.3 has been sent to SID/Testing just few days before the freeze.
This has for sure impacted the development of DTC itself, but also some
other packages (and I fixed some of them). Raphael also pointed out that
time is a problem for the PHP team. We all have to make sure that
our packages are in good shape for this new version of PHP. If the RT
wasn't ready to accept the consequences of such a big move, then maybe
it wasn't a good idea to upload PHP 5.3.2? I'm not sure, and the
decision isn't mine anyway. The goal here is just to highlight the
difficulties due to this change, not to blame anyone. But I really would
like to see as much PHP 5.3 issues fixed as possible, and I've been
working actively on it (and I will try to do more soon). The delay in
having DTC 0.32 uploaded was one of the consequences of such move for sure.

- There has been a lot of people running the latest Git version of DTC
in production for months (some with Lenny, others with Squeeze), and
none of them have reported big issues with the latest release. It isn't
like if it wasn't tested at all... Now that we have officially released,
we're getting a lot of feedback. I've pushed a backport of 0.32.2 in
GPLHost's Debian repository, and so far, only the new extplorer file
manager feature needed a fix (fixed in 0.32.1), another our
templates.php (fixed in 0.32.2). I dont't believe there will be so many
huge issues, but only minors like these, that will have easy fix.

- If the RT was to refuse to migrate 0.32, I'd have 1 year of
git-commits backlog to look into, and a lot of work to do in order to
have version 0.30.x into what I would consider a good shape for Squeeze,
back-porting many patches. Right now, I don't think this is a reasonable
thing to ask me, when 0.32.x is ready, and when Squeeze is soon to be
released.

- *If possible* (that is, if the RT accepts this unblock), we'd like to
drop support for version 0.30.x entirely. We already have to support
branch 0.29 for Lenny, I wouldn't like to have yet another branch to
support. Lenny and Squeeze, that's 2 branches, plus the development one,
that makes it 3. If 0.32 that is already released as new stable, is
refused in Squeeze, that adds a 4th one (the 0.30.x branch), and I would
like to avoid it. Also, 0.32.x is the one that will soon be released for
FreeBSD, and we'd like to have it in sync.

- I have told my plans to multiple members of the RT (at least 2 of them
that I can recall), one of them even told me that he would forward it to
the rest of the release team. Since then, I didn't have any feedback at
all from the RT. If the RT was to deny my request now, I'd say that it
wouldn't be optimum approach. Maybe I should have be

Re: Bug#596130: unblock: doom-wad-shareware/1.9.fixed-1

2010-09-12 Thread Jon Dowland

On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 09:15:50PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Sep  8, 2010 at 21:01:58 +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
> 
> > Please unblock package doom-wad-shareware.
> > 
> You're getting rid of the md5sums control file?

Thanks for spotting. That is not intentional.  Would you
prefer it fixed for squeeze?


-- 
Jon Dowland


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100912160243.ga...@deckard.alcopop.org

Re: Bug#596130: unblock: doom-wad-shareware/1.9.fixed-1

On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 17:02:43 +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:

> On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 09:15:50PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep  8, 2010 at 21:01:58 +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
> > 
> > > Please unblock package doom-wad-shareware.
> > > 
> > You're getting rid of the md5sums control file?
> 
> Thanks for spotting. That is not intentional.  Would you
> prefer it fixed for squeeze?
> 
If it's not too much trouble :)

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: Re: Bug#592900: Updating system-config-printer

2010-09-12 Thread Guido Günther

(reducing the cc: list since this is now release related)
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 03:18:36PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 14:28:34 +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> 
> > Since we don't have any file conflicts we simply let the autoremove
> > handle the removal of python-cupsutils. Would this be an acceptable
> > solution? If so I'd be happy to upload a new version.
> 
> That sounds good to me.
I've uploaded 1.2.3-2 to unstable. Please unblock.
Cheers,
 -- Guido


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100912163900.ga32...@bogon.sigxcpu.org

Bug#596574: unblock: ruby1.9.1/1.9.2.0-1 libgems-ruby/1.3.7-2

2010-09-12 Thread Lucas Nussbaum

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Hi,

OK, those ones are going to be tough sells.

First, the gems changes.
The rubygems1.9.1 package used to be built from the libgems-ruby source
package. But Ruby 1.9.2 broke it, so we decided to switch to using Ruby 1.9.2's
rubygems for 1.9.X.
That requires dropping the 1.9 package from libgems-ruby, and making changes to
the ruby1.9.1 package to add the rubygems files to the ruby1.9.1 package.
(full discussion in #588125)
Additionally, a common complaint from rubygems users was addressed, by allowing
a workaround to do "gem update --system". (Done in both packages).

Then, ruby1.9.1 1.9.2.0-1.
Upstream changes:
We decided to switch to Ruby 1.9.2.x quite late in the release process, and the
work was done during Debconf, at a time when 1.9.2 was not released yet. That's
why the current squeeze version is based off an SVN snapshot. At the time of
the snapshot, Ruby 1.9.2 was already in deep freeze, and all the fixes that
went in since then are bugfixes. We would like to go with 1.9.2.0 instead of
the SVN snapshot, as it will make it much easier to support Ruby 1.9.2 during
the lifetime of squeeze.

Packaging changes:
- we added a build-dep to be able to build a new YAML library
- some minor stuff (debian/watch, new DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)

There's still some work to do on Ruby 1.9 (#593138, #593139, #593140,
#593141), but we would like to have that package in squeeze first as it
already significantly get us closer from a releasable state.

Changelogs:
ruby1.9.1 (1.9.2.0-1) unstable; urgency=high

  [ Lucas Nussbaum ]
  * New upstream release. The 1.9.2 branch was in deep freeze at the time of
the last snapshot, and all the changes between that snapshot and the
present final tarball are bugfixes, as shown by
svn log -r28788:HEAD http://svn.ruby-lang.org/repos/ruby/branches/ruby_1_9_2
Also, it sounds much easier to support a released version on the long
term, rather than an SVN snapshot.
Also fixes CVE-2010-0541. Closes: #593298.
Could also improve kFreeBSD support as some changes are FreeBSD-related.
  * Add build-dependency on libyaml-dev to build psych, which is a new, faster
YAML library provided in Ruby 1.9.2.

  [ Daigo Moriwaki ]
  * debian/watch: support new URL for Ruby 1.9.2.
  * debian/rules: DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="nordoc" provides no-doc build for
build testing.
  * Merged rubygems1.9.1: this package used to be provided by the libgems-ruby
source package, but the version of rubygems provided by libgems-ruby is
incompatible with Ruby 1.9.2. Also, Rubygems is shipped as part of Ruby.
Closes: #588125

  [ Lucas Nussbaum ]
  * Provide a way to override Debian's disabling of gem update --system by
setting an environment variable. This is the same change as the one done
for libgems-ruby.

 -- Lucas Nussbaum   Sat, 11 Sep 2010 08:38:44 +0200

libgems-ruby (1.3.7-2) unstable; urgency=high

  * Team upload.
  * Drop rubygems for 1.9.1, as it was moved to the ruby1.9.1 source package
in version 1.9.2.0-1.
  * Provide a way to override Debian's disabling of gem update --system by
setting an environment variable.
This change is a compromise solution to solve long-standing user complaints
about Rubygems in Debian.

 -- Lucas Nussbaum   Sat, 11 Sep 2010 08:07:37 +0200

unblock ruby1.9.1/1.9.2.0-1
unblock libgems-ruby/1.3.7-2

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (700, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100912172704.31819.94524.report...@beothuk

Re: Gnash 0.8.8 has just been released - Asking for an exception to the freeze

2010-09-12 Thread Miriam Ruiz

2010/9/12 Adam D. Barratt :
> On Sat, 2010-08-28 at 21:49 +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
>> I take it that no one has any problems with me uploading latest gnash
>> to sid. I'll probably do that tomorrow and ask for an exception to the
>> freeze.
>
> 0.8.8-2 was unblocked by Luk, and migrated this morning.

Great! Thanks! :)

Greetings,
Miry


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktiklo1oidobl_w=cyrw6kfid3sk1cmqagtzeg...@mail.gmail.com

Re: Bug #566650: Please unblock dtc 0.32.2-1

On Sun, 2010-09-12 at 23:17 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> - I have missed the deadline only for few days (12 days, right?). Before
> that, the RT had more relaxed rules since the debconf10 announcement,
> which was a surprise for some.

We apparently have different definitions of "few"; mailing 12 days after
the initial freeze announcement is quite different from mailing 12 days
after the announcement of the more restrictive approach.

> - PHP 5.3 has been sent to SID/Testing just few days before the freeze.

The upload history of the php5 package disagrees with you.  5.3.1 was
originally uploaded to unstable in early February, and 5.3.2 in March;
5.3.2-1 migrated to testing in April.

> We all have to make sure that
> our packages are in good shape for this new version of PHP.

Surely it would have been better if this had not been left so late in
the cycle?

> If the RT
> wasn't ready to accept the consequences of such a big move, then maybe
> it wasn't a good idea to upload PHP 5.3.2?

Please could you explain this comment?  As above, PHP 5.3.2 has been in
unstable since March, and testing since April; that was the maintainers'
decision and not something that required the Release Team to be "ready
to accept the consequences".

Regards,

Adam

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1284317091.22294.10545.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net

Permission to upload ganeti-instance-debootstrap 0.9-2

2010-09-12 Thread Iustin Pop

Hi,

I'd like to upload version 0.9-2 which fixes #596009 and a
so-far-unreported bug. The ganeti-instance-debootstrap package contains
an OS definition for the Ganeti virtualization manager.

This OS creation can be customized using hooks (which are run via
run-parts), so I've added two hook to fix these issues.

#596009 is about the fact that Xen in squeeze uses hvc0 as the console
name, not tty0, so I've added a hook to add a getty on hvc0.

The other hook I've added removes root's password, since I realized that
the change to enable shadow by default makes root's account (after a
plain debootstrap run) have a disabled password, which makes login
impossible (and need manual editing). Since the Ganeti "gnt-instance
console" command which accesses the virtual machine console can only be
run by root, this is IMHO safe.

For these hooks I've used the mountpoint command, so I've added a
dependency on initscripts (non-versioned, as Lenny has the right
version, and possibly even Etch).

The other changes is the bumping of Standards version and replacing
Conflicts with Breaks. Both these are unimportant and can be reverted if
you think they shouldn't go in.

I've tested the new package and it makes creations of Xen instance work
fine again. Let me know if uploading is allright, and/or any comments
you might have. Attached is the debdiff on the dsc's, and the debs.

thanks!
iustin
diff -Nru ganeti-instance-debootstrap-0.9/debian/changelog 
ganeti-instance-debootstrap-0.9/debian/changelog
--- ganeti-instance-debootstrap-0.9/debian/changelog2010-04-18 
13:54:36.0 +0200
+++ ganeti-instance-debootstrap-0.9/debian/changelog2010-09-12 
20:36:27.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+ganeti-instance-debootstrap (0.9-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Add a hook for fixing Xen PVM console issues (Closes: #596009)
+  * Add a hook to set the root account to no password, to allow the
+initial login to proceed
+  * Standards version 3.9.1 (replace Conflicts with Breaks)
+
+ -- Iustin Pop   Sun, 12 Sep 2010 19:58:52 +0200
+
 ganeti-instance-debootstrap (0.9-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * New Upstream version
diff -Nru ganeti-instance-debootstrap-0.9/debian/control 
ganeti-instance-debootstrap-0.9/debian/control
--- ganeti-instance-debootstrap-0.9/debian/control  2010-04-18 
13:54:36.0 +0200
+++ ganeti-instance-debootstrap-0.9/debian/control  2010-09-12 
20:36:27.0 +0200
@@ -4,15 +4,15 @@
 Maintainer: Debian Ganeti Team 
 Uploaders: Guido Trotter , Iustin Pop 
 Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7)
-Standards-Version: 3.8.4
+Standards-Version: 3.9.1
 Homepage: http://code.google.com/p/ganeti/
 Vcs-Browser: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-ganeti/instance-debootstrap.git
 Vcs-Git: git://git.debian.org/pkg-ganeti/instance-debootstrap.git
 
 Package: ganeti-instance-debootstrap
 Architecture: all
-Depends: ${misc:Depends}, debootstrap, dump, kpartx
-Conflicts: ganeti (<< 1.2.7)
+Depends: ${misc:Depends}, debootstrap, dump, kpartx, initscripts
+Breaks: ganeti (<< 1.2.7)
 Enhances: ganeti
 Description: debootstrap-based instance OS definition for ganeti
  Ganeti is a virtual server cluster management software tool built on
diff -Nru ganeti-instance-debootstrap-0.9/debian/hooks/clear-root-password 
ganeti-instance-debootstrap-0.9/debian/hooks/clear-root-password
--- ganeti-instance-debootstrap-0.9/debian/hooks/clear-root-password
1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ ganeti-instance-debootstrap-0.9/debian/hooks/clear-root-password
2010-09-12 20:36:27.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+
+set -e
+
+# Make sure we're not working on the root directory
+if [ -z "$TARGET" -o "$TARGET" = "/" ]; then
+echo "Invalid target directory '$TARGET', aborting." 1>&2
+exit 1
+fi
+
+if [ "$(mountpoint /)" = "$(mountpoint "$TARGET")" ]; then
+echo "The target directory seems to be the root dir, aborting."  1>&2
+exit 1
+fi
+
+# Disable root's password, as the switch to enable shadow by default
+# has left root with a disabled password, preventing the initial login
+echo "Disabling root's password"
+chroot "$TARGET" passwd -d root
+
+exit 0
diff -Nru ganeti-instance-debootstrap-0.9/debian/hooks/xen-hvc0 
ganeti-instance-debootstrap-0.9/debian/hooks/xen-hvc0
--- ganeti-instance-debootstrap-0.9/debian/hooks/xen-hvc0   1970-01-01 
01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ ganeti-instance-debootstrap-0.9/debian/hooks/xen-hvc0   2010-09-12 
20:36:27.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+
+set -e
+
+# Make sure we're not working on the root directory
+if [ -z "$TARGET" -o "$TARGET" = "/" ]; then
+echo "Invalid target directory '$TARGET', aborting." 1>&2
+exit 1
+fi
+
+if [ "$(mountpoint /)" = "$(mountpoint "$TARGET")" ]; then
+echo "The target directory seems to be the root dir, aborting."  1>&2
+exit 1
+fi
+
+# Fix the console information for xen-pvm mode
+if [ "$HYPERVISOR" = "xen-pvm" ]; then
+echo "xen-pvm hypervisor detected, adding getty on hvc0"
+cat >> "$TARGET"

Re: [php-maint] Bug #566650: Please unblock dtc 0.32.2-1

2010-09-12 Thread sean finney

On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 07:44:51PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > If the RT
> > wasn't ready to accept the consequences of such a big move, then maybe
> > it wasn't a good idea to upload PHP 5.3.2?
> 
> Please could you explain this comment?  As above, PHP 5.3.2 has been in
> unstable since March, and testing since April; that was the maintainers'
> decision and not something that required the Release Team to be "ready
> to accept the consequences".

and before the first upload to unstable, 5.3 was in experimental for
like 4 months, btw.  i have no idea what the context here is though...


sean



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: Re: Bug#592900: Updating system-config-printer

On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 18:39:00 +0200, Guido Günther wrote:

> (reducing the cc: list since this is now release related)
> On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 03:18:36PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 14:28:34 +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> > 
> > > Since we don't have any file conflicts we simply let the autoremove
> > > handle the removal of python-cupsutils. Would this be an acceptable
> > > solution? If so I'd be happy to upload a new version.
> > 
> > That sounds good to me.
> I've uploaded 1.2.3-2 to unstable. Please unblock.

Done.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: Bug#578458: still fails to build

2010-09-12 Thread gregor herrmann

On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 22:49:50 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:

> > Building against a modified libanyevent-perl_5.271-1 with a fixed
> > O_NONBLOCK value makes the test pass for me on both smetana (sparc)
> > and albeniz (alpha).
> > 
> > I think libanyevent-perl should be turned into an Architecture:any package
> > and at least AnyEvent/constants.pl needs to go in /usr/lib/perl5.
> 
> I've uploaded libanyevent-perl 5.271-2 right now with these changes.
> 
> If it works out we need to ask for a freeze exception.
> (Cc'ing the release team as a "heads up".)

libanyevent-perl 5.271-2 is now built and installed on all
architectures.
  
> > > BTW, I think the current debian/rules backend selection is potentially
> > > buggy as it's looking for substrings in the arch list, meaning "mips"
> > > matches "mipsel" and "i386" matches "kfreebsd-i386".
> 
> Oops.
> 
> > IMHO the backend selection in libcoro-perl should be cleaned away for 
> > squeeze
> > (assuming the above fix works for all architectures.)
> 
> Agreed, that was just an ugly, desparate (and also obviously wrong)
> attempt to find out what's going wrong or beat at it ...
> 
> I guess if the plan works out (i.e. libcoro-perl builds with the
> newer libanyevent-perl), a freeze exception (removing the newly added
> cruft from debian/rules) would be nice.

I've prepared a new libcoro-perl release in our svn repo which
- removes the cruft from debian/rules
- bumps the build and runtime dependency on libanyevent-perl to 
  >= 5.271-2

Before I upload: Is this ok for the release team, and can -- provided
libcoro-perl builds everywhere -- both package be unblocked?

On a second thought: libcoro-perl 5.210-1 in testing should be fine
with the newer libanyevent-perl and a round of binNMUs; and we can
still test this and do the cleanup by uploading 5.230-4 to unstable.
Hm.

I'm also open to other ideas :)

Cheers,
gregor
 
-- 
 .''`.   http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG key IDs: 0x8649AA06, 0x00F3CFE4
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'   Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-NP: Beatles


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#596280: Hacking slapd conffiles to fix an RC bug in kolabd (Was: Bug#596280: unblock: kolabd/2.2.4-20100624-2)

2010-09-12 Thread Mathieu Parent (Debian)

Hi Debian OpenLDAP Maintainers,

The recent move of slapd package to runtime config (aka cn=config, aka
slapd.d) unfortunately broke kolabd. After a bootstrap by the user,
kolabd manages some configuration files including slapd.conf. Since
slapd 2.4.23-3, this is broken as described in #595539.

I have proposed an hacky workaround which set slapd back to
slapd.conf. Julien as Release Team member (thank you!), waits an ack
for your team about this change. So: What do you think?

Note that kolabd for Wheezy will manage cn=config natively (most
probably by creating slapd.conf and using slaptest; but perhaps by
directly issuing ldap commands).

Regards

Mathieu Parent

PS : below is the unblock request

On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 9:28 PM, Julien Cristau  wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 00:26:24 +0200, Mathieu Parent wrote:
>
>> Please unblock package kolabd
>>
>> The main and only reason for this new version is to fix a bug
>> introduced by the move of slapd to runtime configuration (aka
>> cn=config, aka slapd.d). The fix includes a hack which is
>> against policy to revert a similar "against policy" change from
>> slapd postinst. Without this fix, kolab requires manual
>> intervention to work.
>>
>> The diff can be seen at 
>> http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-kolab/?op=comp&compare[]=...@1510&compare[]=...@1511
>>
>> The move back to static slapd config is done only if kolab
>> manages slapd.conf.
>>
>> unblock kolabd/2.2.4-20100624-2
>>
> I'm not unblocking this unless the openldap maintainers tell me it's ok.
>
> Cheers,
> Julien
>

-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktiktwc_l5op2v47nvgoxgnyjk_yygccuycame...@mail.gmail.com

Re: Re: strongswan update to 4.4.x

2010-09-12 Thread Luk Claes

> On Thursday 26 August 2010 22:18:23 Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>> Trying to see how it looks like, I ended up with a big diff.
>>
>>  489 files changed, 27220 insertions(+), 11439 deletions(-)
>>
>> Is there any sane way to review this?
>
> Maybe the best way would be to contact upstream. In my experience, Martin
> Willi and Andreas Steffen are very willing to actively interact with
us. They
> might be able to provide a detailed info on what has changed from
4.3.x to
> 4.4.1 and which impact this might have on stability.
>
> In general, it certainly seems to me that 4.4.x is more stable in
practice
> than 4.3.x.

unblocked

Cheers

Luk


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c8d2df4.7040...@debian.org

Re: Bug #566650: Please unblock dtc 0.32.2-1

2010-09-12 Thread Thomas Goirand

Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-09-12 at 23:17 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> - I have missed the deadline only for few days (12 days, right?). Before
>> that, the RT had more relaxed rules since the debconf10 announcement,
>> which was a surprise for some.
> 
> We apparently have different definitions of "few"; mailing 12 days after
> the initial freeze announcement is quite different from mailing 12 days
> after the announcement of the more restrictive approach.

Yes, I perfectly understand that. I've been made DD only last (end of)
June, which isn't a lot of development time. I wouldn't blame the RT if
there's a negative answer to this unblock, but honestly, I'm trying to
make things better, and this would be the best technical decision to make.

>> - PHP 5.3 has been sent to SID/Testing just few days before the freeze.
> 
> The upload history of the php5 package disagrees with you.  5.3.1 was
> originally uploaded to unstable in early February, and 5.3.2 in March;
> 5.3.2-1 migrated to testing in April.

Oh! Thanks to let me know I was wrong on that one.

>> We all have to make sure that
>> our packages are in good shape for this new version of PHP.
> 
> Surely it would have been better if this had not been left so late in
> the cycle?
> 
>> If the RT
>> wasn't ready to accept the consequences of such a big move, then maybe
>> it wasn't a good idea to upload PHP 5.3.2?
> 
> Please could you explain this comment? As above, PHP 5.3.2 has been in
> unstable since March, and testing since April;

I have sent you a separate email which explains it.

> that was the maintainers'
> decision and not something that required the Release Team to be "ready
> to accept the consequences".

In my previous email, I wrote:

"I'm not sure, and the decision isn't mine anyway. The goal here is just
to highlight the difficulties due to this change, not to blame anyone."

I still don't want to disrespect anyones choice.

Thomas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c8d2dfa.1040...@debian.org

Re: Gnash 0.8.8 has just been released - Asking for an exception to the freeze

2010-09-12 Thread Michael Gilbert

On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 12:21:59 +0100 Adam D. Barratt wrote:

> On Sat, 2010-08-28 at 21:49 +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> > I take it that no one has any problems with me uploading latest gnash
> > to sid. I'll probably do that tomorrow and ask for an exception to the
> > freeze.
> 
> 0.8.8-2 was unblocked by Luk, and migrated this morning.

Thanks!  You guys have been doing a great job.

Best wishes,
Mike


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20100912161206.58f7b7b4.michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com

Re: Gnash 0.8.8 has just been released - Asking for an exception to the freeze

2010-09-12 Thread Miriam Ruiz

2010/9/12 Miriam Ruiz :
> 2010/9/12 Adam D. Barratt :
>> On Sat, 2010-08-28 at 21:49 +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
>>> I take it that no one has any problems with me uploading latest gnash
>>> to sid. I'll probably do that tomorrow and ask for an exception to the
>>> freeze.
>>
>> 0.8.8-2 was unblocked by Luk, and migrated this morning.
>
> Great! Thanks! :)

We would like to upload the version of Gnash package currently in
experimental, to unstable. It is the same upstream release (0.8.8) but
we're exporting some extre binary packages than we're currenty
building in 0.8.8-2: for documentation and fake packages for replacing
swfdec.

Please tell us if that would be a problem.

Lots of thanks,
Miry

-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktim+3mf3pwos=yx9spbeebuaxuidgm2jrnghs...@mail.gmail.com

Re: Bug #566650: Please unblock dtc 0.32.2-1

2010-09-12 Thread Philipp Kern

On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 03:46:02AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> >> If the RT
> >> wasn't ready to accept the consequences of such a big move, then maybe
> >> it wasn't a good idea to upload PHP 5.3.2?
> > Please could you explain this comment? As above, PHP 5.3.2 has been in
> > unstable since March, and testing since April;
> I have sent you a separate email which explains it.
 
Seems most of the PHP disaster is actually due to non-communication on
the public -release list?

Kind regards,
Philipp Kern


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#596616: unblock: pod2pdf/0.42-2

2010-09-12 Thread Steffen Moeller

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception

Please unblock package pod2pdf

It has received a series of patches over the last release which had been
buried in my inbox and for some reason escaped me on the QA page. One
was only forwarded to upstream, the other was applied and forwarded
(implementing a human-readable display of timestamp in PDF), and the 
third significantly improved the description of the package, leading to
some extra wording by myself, too.

The policy was bumped, links to the svn added, the orig.tar.gz was not
touched since upstream has not changed. I have tested the package, with
and without the --timestamp argument which triggers the ontributed patch
and it has worked as expected.

Many thanks

Steffen

unblock pod2pdf/0.42-2

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20100912203818.14272.70523.report...@toshiba.siemens

Bug#596616: marked as done (unblock: pod2pdf/0.42-2)

Your message dated Sun, 12 Sep 2010 22:46:42 +0200
with message-id <20100912204642.ga23...@thrall.0x539.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#596616: unblock: pod2pdf/0.42-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #596616,
regarding unblock: pod2pdf/0.42-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
596616: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596616
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception

Please unblock package pod2pdf

It has received a series of patches over the last release which had been
buried in my inbox and for some reason escaped me on the QA page. One
was only forwarded to upstream, the other was applied and forwarded
(implementing a human-readable display of timestamp in PDF), and the 
third significantly improved the description of the package, leading to
some extra wording by myself, too.

The policy was bumped, links to the svn added, the orig.tar.gz was not
touched since upstream has not changed. I have tested the package, with
and without the --timestamp argument which triggers the ontributed patch
and it has worked as expected.

Many thanks

Steffen

unblock pod2pdf/0.42-2

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 10:38:18PM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote:
> Please unblock package pod2pdf

These changes do not fit the freeze exception rules, sorry.

Kind regards,
Philipp Kern 


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---

Re: Gnash 0.8.8 has just been released - Asking for an exception to the freeze

2010-09-12 Thread Gabriele Giacone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 09/12/2010 10:01 PM, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> 
> Please tell us if that would be a problem.
> 
I'd upload it in unstable without waiting for an answer from RMs.
They're working hard, changes are minimal and they could debdiff them to
evaluate.

In the worst case, which won't hopefully happen, it would remain ignored
in unstable.


Cheers,
Gabriele
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkyNOXAACgkQp3cdCbVcnCuAmwCg1GY/aPh1hxdIMDD/4rrylbyX
d0MAoJKAWaNledSapeoOYbEIae5b+Qxb
=EbVa
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c8d3976.2060...@gmail.com

Bug#596624: unblock: autodocktools/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-1

2010-09-12 Thread Steffen Moeller

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception

Please unblock package autodocktools and its dependencies

Version 1.5.4 of the autodocktools is already in lenny. But the advent
of Python 2.6 it was not prepared for, which led to the recent submission
of a series of serious bug reports (#596318 to #596325 and earlier ones).
In some unfortunate redundant effort those have been addressed by
d...@d.o (performing an NMU) and pi...@d.o (performing fixes in the 
debian med svn). As the maintainer I have been in frequent contact with
upstream, whose work on 1.5.6 has sadly not made it for the freeze
and the cvs showing too many difficulties.

I was today now uploading the very latest of the 1.5.4 branch, i.e. the
official release. For best possible communication of our users with upstream,
I did not want to perform partial updates. Everyone should rest assured that
they get what upstream wants them to have.  

Talking back to upstream, not functional changes have been performed, but
some smaller glitches corrected and upstream is aware of Python 2.6, which
was not the case for the previous version from June last year. So, for
compatibility with Python 2.6, we have

 * work by doko, pjotr and myself on the Debian front
 * work by upstream from their scm

Please unblock the following packages:

unblock autodocktools/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-1
unblock mgltools-bhtree/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-1
unblock mgltools-dejavu/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-1
unblock mgltools-geomutils/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-1
unblock mgltools-gle/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-1
unblock mgltools-mglutil/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-1
unblock mgltools-molkit/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-1
unblock mgltools-networkeditor/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-1
unblock mgltools-opengltk/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-1
unblock mgltools-pmv/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-1
unblock mgltools-pyautodock/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-1
unblock mgltools-pybabel/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-1
unblock mgltools-pyglf/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-1
unblock mgltools-sff/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-1
unblock mgltools-support/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-1
unblock mgltools-symserv/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-1
unblock mgltools-utpackages/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-1
unblock mgltools-viewerframework/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-1
unblock mgltools-vision/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-1
unblock mgltools-volume/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-1

Many thanks

Steffen


-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20100912212340.14502.12546.report...@toshiba.siemens

Please unblock arno-iptable-firewall 1.9.2.k-4

2010-09-12 Thread Michael Hanke

Dear release team,

thanks for having unblocked arno-iptables-firewall 1.9.2.k-3 with a fix
for better IPv6 support. However, that fix also had negative side
effects. I have uploaded 1.9.2.k-4 to unstable that adds two patches to
fix two more IPv6 related issues that are jointly documented in #596170.

http://bugs.debian.org/596170

The new patches are available here:

http://patch-tracker.debian.org/patch/series/view/arno-iptables-firewall/1.9.2.k-4/default_ipv4v6_config

http://patch-tracker.debian.org/patch/series/view/arno-iptables-firewall/1.9.2.k-4/purge_ipv4v6_rules_upon_restart

Other than adding these patches there have been no changes to the
package. The changelog is:

* Add patch to unify the IPv4 and IPv6 default setup to allow outgoing
traffic and all incoming traffic on trusted and loopback interfaces.
This patch also relaxes the rigorous blocking of any IPv6 traffic that was
introduced by 1.9.2.k-3, and caused applications, like wxmaxima, relying on
local IPv6 connection to be broken (Closes: #596170).
* Add patch to prevent IPv6 rule accumulation upon firewall restart. This
patch supplements the default configuration patch and is also documented
in #596170.

I'd be glad if you could allow the version to transition into squeeze.

Thanks in advance,

Michael

--
GPG key: 1024D/3144BE0F Michael Hanke
http://mih.voxindeserto.de

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100913004401.ga27...@meiner

Bug#596640: RM: fluxconf/0.9.9.2-3

2010-09-12 Thread Michael Gilbert

Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Severity: normal

Please remove fluxconf from unstable.  It has a critical bug, and it
hasn't been updated in a year and a half.  See bug #592804 for more
details.

Thanks,
Mike



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20100912204618.3f2ae117.michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com

ed2k-hash, unblock and have sparc try a rebuild

2010-09-12 Thread Ariel



ed2k-hash should enter testing, the only reason it's not in testing 
already is that sparc ran out of space on a build.


So sparc should try a rebuild, then the entire package should move to 
testing (especially since the bug that is fixed is pretty severe).


(Note: I'm not the maintainer of ed2k-hash, I just happened to notice it.)

-Ariel


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/pine.lnx.4.64.1009122042010@ybpnyubfg.ybpnyqbznva

Bug#596280: [Pkg-openldap-devel] Hacking slapd conffiles to fix an RC bug in kolabd (Was: Bug#596280: unblock: kolabd/2.2.4-20100624-2)

2010-09-12 Thread Steve Langasek

Hi Mathieu,

On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 09:26:28PM +0200, Mathieu Parent (Debian) wrote:

> The recent move of slapd package to runtime config (aka cn=config, aka
> slapd.d) unfortunately broke kolabd. After a bootstrap by the user,
> kolabd manages some configuration files including slapd.conf. Since
> slapd 2.4.23-3, this is broken as described in #595539.

> I have proposed an hacky workaround which set slapd back to
> slapd.conf. Julien as Release Team member (thank you!), waits an ack
> for your team about this change. So: What do you think?

I don't think this is acceptable, sorry.  The migration to cn=config by
default is driven by upstream deprecation of slapd.conf, together with a
recognition that it's *harder* for other packages to integrate with slapd
when using slapd.conf.  I don't think installing kolabd should result in
having this change rolled back without asking; and anyway, the
implementation here isn't going to be reliable as most systems are going to
have SLAPD_CONF='' on upgrade anyway.

> Note that kolabd for Wheezy will manage cn=config natively (most
> probably by creating slapd.conf and using slaptest; but perhaps by
> directly issuing ldap commands).

Is there any reason this (slapd.conf + slaptest) couldn't be used as the
workaround in squeeze?  That still doesn't sound great to me given that it
would overwrite any previously present cn=config settings, but it seems to
be the existing practice that kolabd will overwrite slapd configs, so it
should at least do so in the preferred location; and getting this right
shouldn't be any harder than the policy-violating conffile overwrite.

I'm sorry that the change to slapd.d by default has landed as late as it
has, but again, I don't think it's acceptable for an external package to
roll back this change on users' systems and leave them with new upgrade
problems for wheezy, where slapd will *not* run the cn=config migration on
upgrade.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: Bug#592900: Updating system-config-printer

2010-09-12 Thread Michael Biebl

On 12.09.2010 21:38, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 18:39:00 +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> 
>> (reducing the cc: list since this is now release related)
>> On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 03:18:36PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
>>> On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 14:28:34 +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
>>>
 Since we don't have any file conflicts we simply let the autoremove
 handle the removal of python-cupsutils. Would this be an acceptable
 solution? If so I'd be happy to upload a new version.
>>>
>>> That sounds good to me.
>> I've uploaded 1.2.3-2 to unstable. Please unblock.

Unfortunately, the lenny→squeeze upgrade is still broken.

See the bug [1] I filed against upgrade-reports, where I tried to upgrade a
default lenny GNOME desktop.

As you can see from the sid upgrade log for apt-get [2], the
system-config-printer-udev package is not automatically installed on upgrades
and instead the old and useless hal-cups-utils package is kept.

> Investigating system-config-printer-udev
> Package system-config-printer-udev has broken dep on hal-cups-utils
>   Considering hal-cups-utils -1 as a solution to system-config-printer-udev -1
>   Holding Back system-config-printer-udev rather than change hal-cups-utils

Most likely, because system-config-printer-udev is only recommended by
system-config-printer and system-config-printer-udev Conflicts with 
hal-cups-utils.

If we want to get hal-cups-utils removed on upgrades, maybe the Conflicts should
be moved to the system-config-printer package instead?

Getting David into the loop again, for his advice.

Cheers,
Michael

[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596654
[2]
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=5;filename=apt-get-dist-upgrade-to-sid.log;att=4;bug=596654

-- 
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#596655: unblock: glpk-java/1.0.13-4

2010-09-12 Thread Kumar Appaiah

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception

Dear Release Team,

Please consider unblocking the glpk-java package. I justify my request
here (below):

unblock glpk-java/1.0.13-4

The upstream changes between the testing version and the current
unstable version are not very significant. They mostly alter the
examples, documentation and Windows support. The most important
changes were added by the upstream author, who is also responsible for
the Debian package (Heinrich Schuchardt, CCed here), specifically to
refactor the library loading which caused the FTBFS in the testing
version onwards. He has been proactive in testing it out on all the
failing architectures (I used the porterboxes to test out his code),
and has patched the upstream code appropriately.

The Debian-specific changes only allow for some cleanups and minor
changes, which should not affect much.

I attach a fitlered diff, excluding examples, documentation and
Windows specific changes.

Could you please consider unblocking glpk-java?

Thanks!

Kumar
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

diff -Nru glpk-java-1.0.1/ChangeLog glpk-java-1.0.13/ChangeLog
--- glpk-java-1.0.1/ChangeLog	2009-06-06 12:59:51.0 -0500
+++ glpk-java-1.0.13/ChangeLog	2010-03-10 13:41:49.0 -0600
@@ -1,3 +1,43 @@
+Version 1.0.13, 2010-03-10
+	Changed error handling to support callbacks
+Version 1.0.12, 2010-03-07
+	Changed GlpkCallback to use LinkedList instead of TreeSet
+Version 1.0.11, 2010-02-27
+	Removed config.h from makefiles
+	Moved loading of system library to class GLPK
+	Added error handling
+	Added callback functionality for the MIP solver
+Version 1.0.10, 2010-02-20
+	Adjusted examples and makefiles for GLPK 4.43
+	Updated documentation concerning loading JNI library
+Version 1.0.9, 2010-01-13
+	Adjusted examples and makefiles for GLPK 4.42
+	Workaround for va_list
+Version 1.0.8, 2009-12-04
+	Adjusted examples and makefiles for GLPK 4.41
+	Moved examples to examples/java
+	Renamed examples
+	Corrected examples/java/Lp.java
+	Added examples/java/Mip.java
+	Corrected documentation
+	Adjusted w32/check_jni.bat
+Version 1.0.6, 2009-11-04
+	Adjusted examples and makefiles for GLPK 4.40
+	Fixed error in check_jni.bat
+Version 1.0.5, 2009-10-29
+	Fixed error in Windows build files
+Version 1.0.4, 2009-10-29
+	Added documentation
+	Added check files to Windows directories
+	Adjusted buildfiles for swigwin-1.3.40
+Version 1.0.3, 2009-07-26
+	Adjusted examples and makefiles for GLPK 4.39
+	Added usage help to GLPKSwig.java
+	Correction of typos
+Version 1.0.2, 2009-06-11
+	Makefile target test renamed to check
+	Use libtool object file for linking
+	Add /usr/local/include to include path
 Version 1.0.1, 2009-06-06
-corrected swig/Makefile to allow testing before install
-added target dist to Makefile to create distribution files
+	Corrected swig/Makefile to allow testing before install
+	Added target dist to Makefile to create distribution files
diff -Nru glpk-java-1.0.1/debian/changelog glpk-java-1.0.13/debian/changelog
--- glpk-java-1.0.1/debian/changelog	2010-09-12 22:27:11.0 -0500
+++ glpk-java-1.0.13/debian/changelog	2010-09-12 22:27:11.0 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,44 @@
+glpk-java (1.0.13-4) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  [ Kumar Appaiah ]
+  * Use update patch from Heinrich Schuchardt which
+reworks the callback interface between libglpk-java
+and GLPK, and updates the Makefiles.
+
+ -- Debian Scientific Computation Team   Fri, 10 Sep 2010 21:15:56 +
+
+glpk-java (1.0.13-3) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  [ Kumar Appaiah ]
+  * Use patch from Xypron to:
+- change sourcepath to classpath in swig/Makefile, as
+  the former is ignored by gcj.
+- Remove extraneous overrides in examples.
+(Closes: #576896)
+  * Standards Version is now 3.9.1
+
+ -- Debian Scientific Computation Team   Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:11:30 -0500
+
+glpk-java (1.0.13-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Update minimum dependency of libglpk-dev to 4.43
+(due to glpk_error_hook()) as pointed out by
+Heinrich Schuchardt.
+
+ -- Debian Scientific Computation Team   Sun, 21 Mar 2010 15:07:49 -0500
+
+glpk-java (1.0.13-1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  [ Kumar Appaiah ]
+  * New Upstream Release.
++ Fix FTBFS on amd64. (Closes: #572958)
+  * debian/control:
++ Standards Version is now 3.8.4 (No changes needed).
+  * debian/rules:
++ Rename "test" target to "check".
+
+ -- Debian Scientific Computation Team   Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:58:16 -0500
+
 glpk-java (1.0.1-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Non-maintainer upload.
diff -Nru glpk-java-1.0.1/debian/control glpk-java-1.0.13/debian/control
--- glpk-java-1.0.1

Re: future unblock: mobile-broadband-provider-info

2010-09-12 Thread Paul Wise

On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Bhavani Shankar R  wrote:

> I ve prepared a new version upload of my package
> mobile-broadband-provider-info and uploaded it to mentors.debian.net
> with the dsc link as below:
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mobile-broadband-provider-info/mobile-broadband-provider-info_20100910-1.dsc
>
> Its lintian clean and I would like the package to be uploaded to the
> repository and I would like to ask a freeze exception for the same
>
> Rationale for freeze exception: (quoted relevant parts from my previous mail)
>
> I uploaded a new version because it supports new networks fixing
> bug(s) back in ubuntu and in debian too here is the upstream changes
> log
>
> http://git.gnome.org/browse/mobile-broadband-provider-info/log/
>
> also from the README file
>
> " The Package contains only informational files so it's
> safe for distributions to grab updates even during feature freeze and
> maintenance stages."
>
> henceforth I am attaching the debdiff from the present version in
> sid/squeeze for your kind review

Since the changes are similar to previously accepted unblocks, I
uploaded this. Please unblock it.

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktinjvrey+5wpbom0vozzaocroewz9tycyqpwx...@mail.gmail.com

ublocks for security fix uploads

2010-09-12 Thread Michael Gilbert

Hi,

Please unblock the following packages that fix security issues:

unblock cacti/0.8.7g-1
unblock drupal6/6.18-1
unblock iceape/2.0.7-1
unblock iceweasel/3.5.12-2
unblock libgdiplus/2.6.7-3
unblock phpmyadmin/4:3.3.7-1
unblock python2.6/2.6.6-3
unblock python3.1/3.1.2+20100829-1
unblock ruby1.9.1/1.9.2.0-1
unblock sssd/1.2.1-4
unblock strongswan/4.4.1-3
unblock sudo/1.7.4p4-2 (this should be hinted in faster since it was mistakenly 
uploaded with low priority)
unblock webkit/1.2.4-1

unblock kdegraphics/4:4.4.5-2 (note this also needs djvulibre hinted at a 
higher urgency)
unblock djvulibre/3.5.23-3

See http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/status/dtsa-candidates for
details of the security issues that each of these solve.

Thanks,
Mike


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20100912235556.1f2a834b.michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com

Re: future unblock: mobile-broadband-provider-info

2010-09-12 Thread Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 10-09-2010 09:11, Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
> Helllo,
> 
> I ve prepared a new version upload of my package
> mobile-broadband-provider-info and uploaded it to mentors.debian.net
> with the dsc link as below:
> 
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mobile-broadband-provider-info/mobile-broadband-provider-info_20100910-1.dsc
> 
> Its lintian clean and I would like the package to be uploaded to the
> repository and I would like to ask a freeze exception for the same
> 
> Rationale for freeze exception: (quoted relevant parts from my previous mail)
> 
> I uploaded a new version because it supports new networks fixing
> bug(s) back in ubuntu and in debian too here is the upstream changes
> log
> 
> http://git.gnome.org/browse/mobile-broadband-provider-info/log/
> 
> also from the README file
> 
> " The Package contains only informational files so it's
> safe for distributions to grab updates even during feature freeze and
> maintenance stages."
> 
> henceforth I am attaching the debdiff from the present version in
> sid/squeeze for your kind review
> 
> PS: I m CC'ing my sponsor as I would like to request him kindly to
> upload this version asap as I have prepared this version keeping in
> mind users' demand and more so, ubuntu 10.10 final freeze on sep 16th
> (In essence, I would like to see users having up to date support of
> networks in ubuntu 10.10 and also in debian too)
> 
> With warm regards,

Unblocked.
Thank you for your work.

Kind regards,
- -- 
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
Debian. Freedom to code. Code to freedom!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkyNo54ACgkQCjAO0JDlykaHKACcCTVYxyqY8Tr6P1ajDI/zvgTd
wt8An16soIujGwgs5EN/B5L24YP/rzYi
=D6w0
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c8da3a4.5090...@debian.org

Bug#596640: RM: fluxconf/0.9.9.2-3

2010-09-12 Thread Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

reassign 596640 ftp.debian.org
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 596640 - rm
thanks

On 12-09-2010 21:46, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: rm
> Severity: normal
> 
> Please remove fluxconf from unstable.  It has a critical bug, and it
> hasn't been updated in a year and a half.  See bug #592804 for more
> details.

Removals from unstable are handled by FTP Team.

I'm not really sure how to change the user tags,
I'm just removing the 'rm' tag from the r@p.d.o user.

Kind regards,
- -- 
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
Debian. Freedom to code. Code to freedom!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkyNp1gACgkQCjAO0JDlykbbrACffIWJmZninEKcBlcBMFbsUYoP
xe0An1weGq5Myk4wee1pu79zWnP/p1as
=PzV/
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c8da759.1040...@debian.org

Re: Please unblock krb5-auth-dialog 0.16-4

2010-09-12 Thread Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 12-09-2010 08:05, Guido Günther wrote:
> Hi,
> please unblock krb5-auth-dialog. The only remaining change over 0.16-2
> is one line a fix in the desktop file to unconditionally start
> krb5-auth-dialog to make life easier for mobile systems (#582497).
> 
> The other change in 0.16-3 broke translations and so I reverted it in
> -4.

Unblocked.
Thank you for your work.

Kind regards,
- -- 
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
Debian. Freedom to code. Code to freedom!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkyNrasACgkQCjAO0JDlykZbsgCeNBKYzEom7zkIxz57oY2qGivq
LfcAoIVCS7V6fIOSqkmOpKDRTF+7enPF
=FoQI
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c8dadac.5000...@funlabs.org

Bug#596549: marked as done (unblock: phenny/2~hg28-2)

Your message dated Mon, 13 Sep 2010 01:46:40 -0300
with message-id <4c8dacb0.2030...@funlabs.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#596549: unblock: phenny/2~hg28-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #596549,
regarding unblock: phenny/2~hg28-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)

-- 
596549: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596549
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception

Please unblock package phenny

it fixes release critical bug (#596311)

unblock phenny/2~hg28-2

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=pl_PL.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
-- 
mail to -announce 6 months before Debian freeze FTW!

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 12-09-2010 12:00, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: freeze-exception
> 
> Please unblock package phenny
> 
> it fixes release critical bug (#596311)
> 
> unblock phenny/2~hg28-2

Unblocked.

Kind regards,
- -- 
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
Debian. Freedom to code. Code to freedom!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkyNrK8ACgkQCjAO0JDlykYXTwCeJegkdNaM2CbPbi1VOMBidFsN
u7wAnR7/qKH14va1eKX6pyEmpoUQSiCk
=Ib7Y
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Please unblock mahara-1.2.6-2 (currently in NEW)

2010-09-12 Thread Francois Marier

Hi,

Mahara 1.2.6 was released upstream to fix two RC bugs:

- removal of a non-free swf video player (#591200)
- upgrades from 1.0.x (the version in lenny) didn't work (not in the BTS)

The reason why it's currently in NEW is that I created a new contrib package
with the swf files in it. They come with source code, but they require tools
that aren't in Debian to be built from source.

(I did most of these fixes in mahara-1.2.6-1, but I forgot about one swf so I
had to upload mahara-1.2.6-2 shortly after.)

Let me know if this request isn't useful as long as the packages as in NEW
and I'll resubmit once they've been accepted by ftpmasters.

Cheers,
Francois

-- 
Francois Marier identi.ca/fmarier
http://feeding.cloud.geek.nz  twitter.com/fmarier


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#596450: marked as done (unblock: micro-evtd/3.3.3-7)

Your message dated Mon, 13 Sep 2010 01:55:59 -0300
with message-id <4c8daedf.70...@funlabs.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#596450: unblock: micro-evtd/3.3.3-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #596450,
regarding unblock: micro-evtd/3.3.3-7
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)

-- 
596450: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596450
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please allow micro-evtd/3.3.3-7 to migrate to squeeze.  The package has 
been reviewed and uploaded to unstable by Martin Michlmayr (CCed).  The 
package is only used on the Buffalo Linkstation Pro/Live and Kurobox Pro 
platforms, so the affected userbase is very small; however the update is 
quite important for those users.

The upload fixes a bug causing the daemon not to start automatically in 
debian-installer, and fixes a number of bashisms in scripts included in 
d-i where bash is is not available.  Please see the annotated changelog 
below for more details.

Thanks,
Ryan

* debian/udeb/micro_evtd.command: Fixed test condition for whether 
daemon is already running. (Closes: #580549)

If the daemon is not started correctly, the built-in watchdog timer 
kills the machine after 5 minutes.  Therefore this fix is important for 
debian-installer so that users are not required to start it manually.

* debian/patches/microapl-bashisms.patch: Fixed several more bashisms in 
microapl.  Based on a patch by Noriaki Mitsunaga. (Closes: #534257)
* debian/patches/eventscript.patch: Fixed more bashisms, so the script 
actually copies and runs now.

* debian/patches/script-paths.patch: Refreshed.

These scripts are currently not functional unless bash is used as the 
interpreter.  It is not reasonable to set bash as the interpreter for 
them because they are included in debian-installer.

* debian/init.d:
  - Replaced Required-{Start,Stop} with values from 
/etc/init.d/skeleton, as the daemon has no special requirements.  (Fixes 
a lintian error.)

  - Added runlevel 1 to Default-Stop.  (Fixes a lintian warning.)

Trivial change to fix a lintian error.

* debian/rules: Overrode CFLAGS to work around a segfault that appears 
when built with optimizations.

This change is the reason for the delay in sending an unblock request, 
since I was trying to debug the crash.  It is not caused by my changes; 
it appears even when building the unmodified previous version.  I wasn't 
able to find the cause and so I included this workaround.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 11-09-2010 13:08, Ryan Tandy wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> 
> Please allow micro-evtd/3.3.3-7 to migrate to squeeze.  The package has
> been reviewed and uploaded to unstable by Martin Michlmayr (CCed).  The
> package is only used on the Buffalo Linkstation Pro/Live and Kurobox Pro
> platforms, so the affected userbase is very small; however the update is
> quite important for those users.
> 
> The upload fixes a bug causing the daemon not to start automatically in
> debian-installer, and fixes a number of bashisms in scripts included in
> d-i where bash is is not available.  Please see the annotated changelog
> below for more details.
> 
> Thanks,
> Ryan
> 
> * debian/udeb/micro_evtd.command: Fixed test condition for whether
> daemon is already running. (Closes: #580549)
> 
> If the daemon is not started correctly, the built-in watchdog timer
> kills the machine after 5 minutes.  Therefore this fix is important for
> debian-installer so that users are not required to start it manually.
> 
> * debian/patches/microapl-bashisms.patch: Fixed several more bashisms in
> microapl.  Based on a patch by Noriaki Mitsunaga. (Closes: #534257)
> * debian/patches/eventscript.patch: Fixed more bashisms, so the script
> actually copies and runs now.
> * debian/patches/script-paths.patch: Refreshed.
> 
> These scripts are currently not functional unless bash is used as the
> interpreter.  It is not reasonable to set bash as the interpreter for
> them because they are included in debian-installer.
> 
> * debian/init.d:
>   - Replaced Required-{Start,Stop} with values from
> /etc/init.d/skeleton, as the daemon has no special requirements.  (Fixes
> a lintian error.)
>   - Added runlevel 1 to Default-Stop.  (Fixes a lintian warning.)
> 
> Trivial change to fix a lintian error.
> 
> * debian/rules: Over

Bug#596658: unblock: libapache-mod-musicindex/1.3.5-1

2010-09-12 Thread martin f krafft

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception

Please unblock package libapache-mod-musicindex

The current libapache-mod-musicindex has a memory access bug
(pointer accessed outside scope), causing it to return an invalid
Content-Disposition for playlist downloads. This is primarily
inconvenient to users (whose default handler application will not be
respected, as the browser is required by the standard to ask what to
do if it cannot decipher the Content-Disposition.

We found and fixed the problem last week, and 1.3.5-1 has been in
the archives for 10 days. Please let it into squeeze.

libapache-mod-musicindex (1.3.5-1) unstable; urgency=low

 * Fix Content-Disposition for playlists (Closes: #595232)


unblock libapache-mod-musicindex/1.3.5-1

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.35-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft   Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer   http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)

Bug#596659: unblock: mdadm/3.1.4-1+8efb9d1

2010-09-12 Thread martin f krafft

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package mdadm

Although I expect there to be a 3.1.5 soon, this version fixes
numerous serious bugs in the version currently in testing, as well
as som others:

mdadm  (3.1.4-1+8efb9d1) unstable; urgency=low

  * Added patch with Makefile fix from upstream (commit 8efb9d1) to fix
compiler/linker problem on non-x86 architectures (closes: #595290).

 -- martin f. krafft   Fri, 03 Sep 2010 10:45:01 +0200

mdadm (3.1.4-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * New upstream release, which closes:#595039 and addresses the following
issues too:
- reverts move of incremental map (closes: #585015).
- fixes mdadm monitor in the case of an inactive (or start-failed) raid0
  or linear array (closes: #539154).
- prevent --remove faulty from skipping renumbered devices
  (closes: #587550).
- fixed overflow when growing a RAID6 (closes: #589493).
  * However, disable the incremental assembly upstream turned on in 3.1.3 for
now, this will have to wait until after the squeeze release.
  * initramfs/hook: make sure configuration file exists before accessing it;
thanks to Michael Prokop for the fix and NMU (closes: #589836).
  * initramfs/hook: Match UUID case-insensitive while checking for running
arrays not listed in mdadm.conf; thanks to Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe for the
patch (closes: #583545).
  * Fix URL in the bug reporting preamble (presubj) (closes: #589833).
  * Add I/O rescheduling functionality to the checkarray script and make the
cronjob use the idle priority; this should now minimise the impact of the
monthly re-check on the running system; Florian Heigl had the idea
(closes: #592149, #508123).

 -- martin f. krafft   Sun, 29 Aug 2010 13:44:59 +0200



unblock mdadm/3.1.4-1+8efb9d1

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.35-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft   Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer   http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)

Re: ublocks for security fix uploads

2010-09-12 Thread Luk Claes

On 09/13/2010 05:55 AM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> Hi,

Hi

> Please unblock the following packages that fix security issues:
> 
> unblock cacti/0.8.7g-1
> unblock drupal6/6.18-1
> unblock iceape/2.0.7-1
> unblock iceweasel/3.5.12-2

all unblocked

> unblock libgdiplus/2.6.7-3

unblocked and aged to 5 days

> unblock phpmyadmin/4:3.3.7-1

unblocked 2 days ago by Adam

> unblock python2.6/2.6.6-3

unblocked

> unblock python3.1/3.1.2+20100829-1

unblocked and aged to 20 days

> unblock ruby1.9.1/1.9.2.0-1

unblocked and aged to 20 days due to massive changes

> unblock sssd/1.2.1-4

unblocked

> unblock strongswan/4.4.1-3

unblocked yesterday

> unblock sudo/1.7.4p4-2 (this should be hinted in faster since it was 
> mistakenly uploaded with low priority)

No, I changed the aging, because there are a lot more changes than
fixing the security issue.

> unblock webkit/1.2.4-1

unblocked 7 days ago by Julien

> unblock kdegraphics/4:4.4.5-2 (note this also needs djvulibre hinted at a 
> higher urgency)
> unblock djvulibre/3.5.23-3

unblocked, djvulibre aged to 5 days

Cheers

Luk


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c8dbe97.60...@debian.org

Bug#596662: unblock: iceweasel/3.5.12-2

2010-09-12 Thread Mike Hommey

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package iceweasel

The original 3.5.12-1 package had the changes mentionned in
20100902145001.gb31...@glandium.org, 3.5.12-2 added 2 fixes for induced
FTBFSes on hppa and hurd. Both fixes only touch to build scripts, not
code. See the attached debdiff.

unblock iceweasel/3.5.12-2

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
diff -Nru iceweasel-3.5.12/debian/changelog iceweasel-3.5.12/debian/changelog
--- iceweasel-3.5.12/debian/changelog	2010-09-08 09:04:44.0 +0200
+++ iceweasel-3.5.12/debian/changelog	2010-09-11 11:04:53.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+iceweasel (3.5.12-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * config/JarMaker.py: Use errno.ENOENT instead of "2" in JarMaker.py.
+bz#595459. Fixes FTBFS on Hurd.
+  * debian/rules, debian/xulrunner-dev.install.in: Build npapi_getinfo in
+build-xulrunner/dist/bin, and use an RPATH. Some plugins depend on
+libxpcom.so, and dlopen() from npapi_getinfo fails unless libxpcom.so
+can be loaded too. Fixes FTBFS on hppa as a side effect.
+
+ -- Mike Hommey   Sat, 11 Sep 2010 09:42:37 +0200
+
 iceweasel (3.5.12-1) unstable; urgency=high
 
   * New upstream release.
diff -Nru iceweasel-3.5.12/debian/patches/fixes/Use-errno.ENOENT-instead-of-2-in-JarMaker.py.patch iceweasel-3.5.12/debian/patches/fixes/Use-errno.ENOENT-instead-of-2-in-JarMaker.py.patch
--- iceweasel-3.5.12/debian/patches/fixes/Use-errno.ENOENT-instead-of-2-in-JarMaker.py.patch	1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ iceweasel-3.5.12/debian/patches/fixes/Use-errno.ENOENT-instead-of-2-in-JarMaker.py.patch	2010-09-11 11:04:40.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+From 3630e5168a6f5be3035210eb07e4fa9f6c52813b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Mike Hommey 
+Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 09:31:09 +0200
+Subject: Use errno.ENOENT instead of "2" in JarMaker.py
+
+https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=595459
+---
+ config/JarMaker.py |5 +++--
+ 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/config/JarMaker.py b/config/JarMaker.py
+index 9bd5111..3029120 100644
+--- a/config/JarMaker.py
 b/config/JarMaker.py
+@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ See the documentation for jar.mn on MDC for further details on the format.
+ import sys
+ import os
+ import os.path
++import errno
+ import re
+ import logging
+ from time import localtime
+@@ -385,7 +386,7 @@ class JarMaker(object):
+   try:
+ os.remove(out)
+   except OSError, e:
+-if e.errno != 2:
++if e.errno != errno.ENOENT:
+   raise
+   return open(out, 'wb')
+ def ensureDirFor(self, name):
+@@ -405,7 +406,7 @@ class JarMaker(object):
+   try:
+ os.remove(out)
+   except OSError, e:
+-if e.errno != 2:
++if e.errno != errno.ENOENT:
+   raise
+   os.symlink(src, out)
+ 
+-- 
+1.7.2.rc1.13.gd67bc
+
diff -Nru iceweasel-3.5.12/debian/patches/series iceweasel-3.5.12/debian/patches/series
--- iceweasel-3.5.12/debian/patches/series	2010-09-07 08:56:20.0 +0200
+++ iceweasel-3.5.12/debian/patches/series	2010-09-11 11:04:40.0 +0200
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
 fixes/Use-syscall-for-mmap-and-munmap-and-disable-ncpus-in.patch
 fixes/Calculate-negotiate-auth-token-length-after-removing.patch
 fixes/Bug-504766.-qcms-Fix-unaligned-reads-in-qcms.-r-jrmu.patch
+fixes/Use-errno.ENOENT-instead-of-2-in-JarMaker.py.patch
 iceweasel-branding/Rename-Firefox-to-Iceweasel.patch
 iceweasel-branding/Set-MOZ_APP_NAME-to-iceweasel.patch
 iceweasel-branding/Our-name-should-be-Iceweasel-not-Firefox.patch
diff -Nru iceweasel-3.5.12/debian/rules iceweasel-3.5.12/debian/rules
--- iceweasel-3.5.12/debian/rules	2010-09-07 08:53:03.0 +0200
+++ iceweasel-3.5.12/debian/rules	2010-09-11 11:04:52.0 +0200
@@ -84,8 +84,8 @@
 debian/dh/dh_xulrunner.1: debian/dh/dh_xulrunner
 	pod2man -c Debhelper -r $(GRE_VERSION) $^ > $@
 
-debian/dh/npapi_getinfo: %: %.c
-	$(CC) -o $@ $< -Imodules/plugin/base/public -ldl
+build-xulrunner/dist/bin/npapi_getinfo: debian/dh/npapi_getinfo.c
+	$(CC) -o $@ $< -Imodules/plugin/base/public -ldl -Wl,-rpath,\$$ORIGIN
 
 IN_FILES := $(wildcard debian/*.in debian/dh/*.in)
 define preprocess
@@ -244,7 +244,7 @@
 override_dh_installdocs: MPL
 	dh_installdocs -A $^
 
-stamps/dh_install:: debian/dh/dh_xulrunner debian/noinstall debian/dh/npapi_getinfo
+stamps/dh_install:: debian/dh/dh_xulrunner debian/noinstall build-xulrunner/dist/bin/npapi_getinfo
 	awk '{print "debian/tmp/" $$1 }' < debian/noinstall | xargs rm -r
 	dh_install --fail-missing
 #Install helpers
@@ -284,10 +284,10 @@
 	# Make sure dh_xulrunner is able to spot the current XPCOM standalone glue.
 	perl debian/dh/dh_xulrun

Re: Bug#592900: Updating system-config-printer