when is squeeze due to be the next stable?
will squeeze stable include kde 4 in it's release? -- regards, Dan Hirsch, Software Engineer @ Top-Q Linked-In: http://www.linkedin.com/in/danhirsch1
Re: when is squeeze due to be the next stable?
dan hirsch writes: >will squeeze stable include kde 4 in it's release? Yes. We have not yet decided on a release date, squeeze continues to be under heavy development. Marc pgpJbppIyFTkb.pgp Description: PGP signature
NEW changes in proposedupdates
Processing changes file: apache2_2.2.9-10+lenny8_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: apache2_2.2.9-10+lenny7_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: apache2_2.2.9-10+lenny7_alpha.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: apache2_2.2.9-10+lenny7_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: apache2_2.2.9-10+lenny7_arm.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: apache2_2.2.9-10+lenny7_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: apache2_2.2.9-10+lenny7_hppa.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: apache2_2.2.9-10+lenny7_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: apache2_2.2.9-10+lenny7_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: apache2_2.2.9-10+lenny7_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: apache2_2.2.9-10+lenny7_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: apache2_2.2.9-10+lenny7_s390.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: apache2_2.2.9-10+lenny7_sparc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: apache2-mpm-itk_2.2.6-02-1+lenny2+b4_alpha.changes Rejecting. REJECT Processing changes file: apache2-mpm-itk_2.2.6-02-1+lenny2+b3_amd64.changes Rejecting. REJECT Processing changes file: apache2-mpm-itk_2.2.6-02-1+lenny2+b3_arm.changes Rejecting. REJECT Processing changes file: apache2-mpm-itk_2.2.6-02-1+lenny2+b3_armel.changes Rejecting. REJECT Processing changes file: apache2-mpm-itk_2.2.6-02-1+lenny2+b3_hppa.changes Rejecting. REJECT Processing changes file: apache2-mpm-itk_2.2.6-02-1+lenny2+b3_i386.changes Rejecting. REJECT Processing changes file: apache2-mpm-itk_2.2.6-02-1+lenny2+b3_ia64.changes Rejecting. REJECT Processing changes file: apache2-mpm-itk_2.2.6-02-1+lenny2+b3_mips.changes Rejecting. REJECT Processing changes file: apache2-mpm-itk_2.2.6-02-1+lenny2+b3_mipsel.changes Rejecting. REJECT Processing changes file: apache2-mpm-itk_2.2.6-02-1+lenny2+b3_powerpc.changes Rejecting. REJECT Processing changes file: apache2-mpm-itk_2.2.6-02-1+lenny2+b3_s390.changes Rejecting. REJECT Processing changes file: apache2-mpm-itk_2.2.6-02-1+lenny2+b3_sparc.changes Rejecting. REJECT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1o4dsy-000813...@ries.debian.org
Bug#578528: release.debian.org: Please hint shorewall/shorewall6 to testing
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The shorewall and shorewall6 packages are stuck and in need of manual hinting. Regards, - -Roberto - -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0.4 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkvN1BgACgkQ5SXWIKfIlGTjegCdH0hUL13Evui07HGZBE517sL4 v/UAoIECzeOsMdoza72sqFwULxaQda1m =J0fh -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100420161936.25647.59732.report...@miami.connexer.com
Bug#578532: nmu: squid3_3.1.1-3
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hello, during the last build of squid3 on amd64 a missing system header for IPv6 socket on the build machine caused squid3_3.1.1-3 to ship without IPv6 support. Bug is reported as #578047 and #578519. nmu squid3_3.1.1-3 . amd64 . -m "Rebuild with IPv6 support (Closes: #578047, #578519)" Regards, L -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100420162320.20487.30773.report...@seneca.lugroma3.org
Bug#578542: pu: package mpg123/1.4.3-4lenny1
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi!
DSA 1958 introduced a libtool update that would no longer add the current
working directory to the library search path (CVE-2009-3736). This broke the
mpg123 version in lenny which chdir()s to its plugin directory and relies on
the previous libtool behaviour to find its output modules. Therefore, I'd like
to ask for permission to upload a new version of mpg123 to proposed-updates
that fixes the regression. Debdiff is attached.
Regards,
Daniel.
diff -u mpg123-1.4.3/debian/changelog mpg123-1.4.3/debian/changelog
--- mpg123-1.4.3/debian/changelog
+++ mpg123-1.4.3/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+mpg123 (1.4.3-4lenny1) stable; urgency=medium
+
+ * src/module.c: Backport upstream patch to fix regression in module
+loading when a libltdl with a fix for CVE-2009-3736 is in place.
+Closes: #572920
+
+ -- Daniel Kobras Mon, 29 Mar 2010 11:56:52 +0200
+
mpg123 (1.4.3-4) unstable; urgency=medium
* src/wav.c: Backport upstream patch for writing WAV output to stdout
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- mpg123-1.4.3.orig/src/module.c
+++ mpg123-1.4.3/src/module.c
@@ -93,13 +93,14 @@
chdir(moddir);
/* Work out the path of the module to open */
- module_path_len = strlen(type) + 1 + strlen(name) +
strlen(MODULE_FILE_SUFFIX) + 1;
+ /* Note that we need to open ./file, not just file! */
+ module_path_len = 2 + strlen(type) + 1 + strlen(name) +
strlen(MODULE_FILE_SUFFIX) + 1;
module_path = malloc( module_path_len );
if (module_path == NULL) {
error1( "Failed to allocate memory for module name: %s",
strerror(errno) );
goto om_bad;
}
- snprintf( module_path, module_path_len, "%s_%s%s", type, name,
MODULE_FILE_SUFFIX );
+ snprintf( module_path, module_path_len, "./%s_%s%s", type, name,
MODULE_FILE_SUFFIX );
/* Display the path of the module created */
debug1( "Module path: %s", module_path );
Bug#578528: marked as done (release.debian.org: Please hint shorewall/shorewall6 to testing)
Your message dated Tue, 20 Apr 2010 18:45:11 +0100 with message-id <1271785511.3079.51.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net> and subject line Re: Bug#578528: release.debian.org: Please hint shorewall/shorewall6 to testing has caused the Debian Bug report #578528, regarding release.debian.org: Please hint shorewall/shorewall6 to testing to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 578528: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=578528 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The shorewall and shorewall6 packages are stuck and in need of manual hinting. Regards, - -Roberto - -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0.4 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkvN1BgACgkQ5SXWIKfIlGTjegCdH0hUL13Evui07HGZBE517sL4 v/UAoIECzeOsMdoza72sqFwULxaQda1m =J0fh -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 12:19 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > The shorewall and shorewall6 packages are stuck and in need of manual > hinting. Easy hint added. Regards, Adam --- End Message ---
Re: New PostgreSQL bug fix release 8.3.10 for Lenny
On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 17:03 +0200, Martin Pitt wrote: > It's that time of the year again, PostgreSQL released a new > bug fix release three weeks ago: > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/release-8-3-10.html [...] > Source/binary packages and debdiff (filtered out documentation and > autoconf changes): > > http://people.debian.org/~mpitt/psql/ > > OK to upload? Just a quick note to let you know that this hasn't been forgotten about; we just haven't had chance to review the changes yet. Sorry for the delay. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1271787191.3079.390.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net
Bug#578430: marked as done (pu: package apache2/2.2.9-10+lenny8)
Your message dated Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:15:40 +0100 with message-id <1271787340.3717.25.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net> and subject line Re: Bug#578430: pu: package apache2/2.2.9-10+lenny8 has caused the Debian Bug report #578430, regarding pu: package apache2/2.2.9-10+lenny8 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 578430: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=578430 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Severity: normal Please review apache2/2.2.9-10+lenny8 for inclusion in 5.0.5. Here is the changelog: apache2 (2.2.9-10+lenny8) stable-security; urgency=low * Add missing psmisc dependency for killall used in the init script. Closes: #568542 * Fix potential memory leaks related to the usage of apr_brigade_destroy(). The memory leak patch has been included in 2.2.15 (released 6 weeks ago), without problems. The full debdiff is at http://people.debian.org/~sf/apache2_2.2.9-10+lenny8.debdiff After the package is accepted, remember to binNMU apache2-mpm-itk to build against the new apache2-src. TIA. Stefan --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 22:07 +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > Please review apache2/2.2.9-10+lenny8 for inclusion in 5.0.5. Here > is the changelog: > > apache2 (2.2.9-10+lenny8) stable-security; urgency=low > > * Add missing psmisc dependency for killall used in the init script. > Closes: #568542 > * Fix potential memory leaks related to the usage of apr_brigade_destroy(). Accepted. > After the package is accepted, remember to binNMU apache2-mpm-itk to > build against the new apache2-src. Scheduled, with appropriate dep-waits. Regards, Adam --- End Message ---
Re: graphicsmagick testing propagation
Hi,
On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 21:45 +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> According to http://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=graphicsmagick,
> graphicsmagick 1.3.12-1 won't transition to testing because it would introduce
> new bug #559811. However, this bug was closed by the current version in
> testing, and also doesn't affect the unstable version. This is correctly
> tracked by the BTS as well, so I wonder why the testing scripts disagree.
britney ("the testing scripts") is provided with the list of RC bugs in
testing and unstable by the BTS; the list of open bugs in unstable
includes #559811 but the list for testing does not, hence it being
classed as a "new" bug.
I can't immediately see why the bug is being included in the list and
have asked one of the BTS admins if they could have a look.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/1271788945.4187.64.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net
Bug#578532: nmu: squid3_3.1.1-3
Hi, On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 18:23 +0200, Luigi Gangitano wrote: > during the last build of squid3 on amd64 a missing system header for IPv6 > socket on the build machine caused squid3_3.1.1-3 to ship without IPv6 > support. > Bug is reported as #578047 and #578519. > > nmu squid3_3.1.1-3 . amd64 . -m "Rebuild with IPv6 support (Closes: > #578047, #578519)" Bastian Blank's comment in #578047 points to a bug in the package's detection of IPv6 support, rather than a build problem. Whilst it is possible that a binNMU would be built on a machine with IPv6 support configured, that's not guaranteed and should not be relied upon. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1271790152.4486.162.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net
Re: OK to update Boost defaults?
On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 19:58 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > Hi Marc & Debian-Release, > > On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 09:53:18AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > > "Steve M. Robbins" writes: > > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 12:09:51PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > > >> No. We are currently trying to work out the hdf5 and ghc6 transitions > > >> and have enormous buildd backlogs on mips*, making a binNMU campagain > > >> for long-building packages (and let's face it, most of boost users take > > >> more than a few seconds to build...) a problem right now. > > > OK, so what's the process now? I just uploaded a new revision > > > 1.42.0-2 so it will be at least 10 more days until it transitions. > > > Shall I wait for that and ping you again? > > > > Sounds fine :) > > OK, boost 1.42 is now in testing. Can you advise me if and when > I can upload new boost-default packages pointing to 1.42? Please go ahead with the upload to unstable and let us know if you need any related binNMUs scheduling. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1271799612.6125.951.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net
Re: OK to update Boost defaults?
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:40:11PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 19:58 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > OK, boost 1.42 is now in testing. Can you advise me if and when > > I can upload new boost-default packages pointing to 1.42? > > Please go ahead with the upload to unstable and let us know if you need > any related binNMUs scheduling. OK, I've uploaded boost-defaults. It's presently in the NEW queue. I don't know how to determine whether binNMUs need scheduling. Can you help me with that? Thanks, -Steve signature.asc Description: Digital signature
