Status of Squeeze Release Notes
Hello, I am upgrading a lenny system to squeeze next weekend. Are there already any release notes which I could test and provide feedback for? Thanks, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Lärchenstr. 6 D-72135 Dettenhausen 07157-734133 email: rdor...@web.de jabber: rdor...@jabber.org GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: nfs-kernel-server, 2.6.32 and lenny
On Sun, 2010-04-18 at 12:08 +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 01:40:10PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > >On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 08:45 -0700, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > >>On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 09:09:11AM +0100, John Winters wrote: > >>>2) Kernel 2.6.32-2 causes problems with Lenny running as an NFS > >>>server. The nfs-kernel-server startup scripts try to check whether > >>>the kernel is NFS-capable and erroneously decide it isn't. > >> > >>This has been fixed in unstable but I think it would be nice to push a > >>fix into lenny too since a lot of people run newer kernels on lenny. > >> > >>debian-kernel: any thoughts? > > > >Agreed. > > > >Aníbal, do you want to prepare this or shall I? > > Please go ahead. Thank you Ben. I don't have a lenny devel environment > right now and it'll take some time before I can build one. I'm intending to upload nfs-utils to stable-proposed-updates with the following changes, to support partial upgrades (specifically kernel upgrades). Please ack/nak. Ben. diff -u nfs-utils-1.1.2/debian/changelog nfs-utils-1.1.2/debian/changelog --- nfs-utils-1.1.2/debian/changelog +++ nfs-utils-1.1.2/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +nfs-utils (1:1.1.2-6lenny2) stable; urgency=low + + * Update maintainers and uploaders to match unstable + * Fix test for NFS kernel server support in init script (Closes: #550153) + + -- Ben Hutchings Sun, 18 Apr 2010 12:31:00 +0100 + nfs-utils (1:1.1.2-6lenny1) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=high * Fix CVE-2008-4552 diff -u nfs-utils-1.1.2/debian/control nfs-utils-1.1.2/debian/control --- nfs-utils-1.1.2/debian/control +++ nfs-utils-1.1.2/debian/control @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ Source: nfs-utils Priority: standard Section: net -Maintainer: Anibal Monsalve Salazar -Uploaders: Steinar H. Gunderson , Daniel Baumann +Maintainer: Debian kernel team +Uploaders: Anibal Monsalve Salazar , Ben Hutchings Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5), libwrap0-dev, libevent-dev, libnfsidmap-dev, libkrb5-dev, libgssglue-dev (>= 0.1-1), librpcsecgss-dev (>= 0.16-1), libblkid-dev, libkeyutils-dev, pkg-config, quilt (>= 0.40), libldap2-dev Standards-Version: 3.8.0.1 Homepage: http://nfs.sourceforge.net/ diff -u nfs-utils-1.1.2/debian/nfs-kernel-server.init nfs-utils-1.1.2/debian/nfs-kernel-server.init --- nfs-utils-1.1.2/debian/nfs-kernel-server.init +++ nfs-utils-1.1.2/debian/nfs-kernel-server.init @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ do_modprobe nfsd # See if our running kernel supports the NFS kernel server - if [ -f /proc/kallsyms ] && ! grep -qE 'init_nf(sd| )' /proc/kallsyms; then + if ! grep -E -qs "[[:space:]]nfsd\$" /proc/filesystems; then log_warning_msg "Not starting $DESC: no support in current kernel." exit 0 fi --- END --- -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: permission to upload ICU 4.4 to unstable
Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > ICU 4.4 was released a few weeks ago. There are very few changes from > 4.4.rc1. I'm going to do one upload of 4.4 to experimental to make sure > it builds properly on all platforms. If all goes well, I'd like to go > ahead and upload to unstable. Please let me know when I can proceed > with the upgrade. As before, there are no API changes for people who > stick to published interfaces, so binary NMUs for reverse dependencies > should be adequate, as it has been for the last few ICU transitions. Hello again. I'm still waiting for a response to this. Of course, I understand that the release team is busy and understaffed, and that you have to serialize things sometimes, so I'm not complaining...I'm just asking for an update. :-) I know you know about it because I saw it in your bits from the release team. If you could let me know where this is in the queue, I'd appreciate it. Alternatively, if there's something else I need to do to get this on the queue, I'm not aware of it. I remember some discussion about using the BTS for this kind of request, but I don't remember seeing a resolution to that question. Thanks. -- Jay Berkenbilt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100418100019.0267997463.qww314...@soup
NEW changes in proposedupdates
Processing changes file: jasper_1.900.1-5.1+lenny1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: jasper_1.900.1-5.1+lenny1_alpha.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: jasper_1.900.1-5.1+lenny1_arm.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: jasper_1.900.1-5.1+lenny1_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: jasper_1.900.1-5.1+lenny1_hppa.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: jasper_1.900.1-5.1+lenny1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: jasper_1.900.1-5.1+lenny1_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: jasper_1.900.1-5.1+lenny1_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: jasper_1.900.1-5.1+lenny1_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: jasper_1.900.1-5.1+lenny1_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: jasper_1.900.1-5.1+lenny1_s390.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: jasper_1.900.1-5.1+lenny1_sparc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: glibc_2.7-18lenny2_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: glibc_2.7-18lenny2_alpha.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: glibc_2.7-18lenny2_arm.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: glibc_2.7-18lenny2_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: glibc_2.7-18lenny2_hppa.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: glibc_2.7-18lenny2_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: glibc_2.7-18lenny2_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: glibc_2.7-18lenny2_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: glibc_2.7-18lenny2_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: glibc_2.7-18lenny2_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: glibc_2.7-18lenny2_s390.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: glibc_2.7-18lenny2_sparc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: network-manager-applet_0.6.6-4+lenny1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: network-manager-applet_0.6.6-4+lenny1_alpha.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: network-manager-applet_0.6.6-4+lenny1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: network-manager-applet_0.6.6-4+lenny1_arm.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: network-manager-applet_0.6.6-4+lenny1_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: network-manager-applet_0.6.6-4+lenny1_hppa.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: network-manager-applet_0.6.6-4+lenny1_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: network-manager-applet_0.6.6-4+lenny1_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: network-manager-applet_0.6.6-4+lenny1_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: network-manager-applet_0.6.6-4+lenny1_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: network-manager-applet_0.6.6-4+lenny1_s390.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: network-manager-applet_0.6.6-4+lenny1_sparc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ffmpeg-debian_0.svn20080206-18+lenny1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ffmpeg-debian_0.svn20080206-18+lenny1_alpha.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ffmpeg-debian_0.svn20080206-18+lenny1_arm.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ffmpeg-debian_0.svn20080206-18+lenny1_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ffmpeg-debian_0.svn20080206-18+lenny1_hppa.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ffmpeg-debian_0.svn20080206-18+lenny1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ffmpeg-debian_0.svn20080206-18+lenny1_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ffmpeg-debian_0.svn20080206-18+lenny1_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ffmpeg-debian_0.svn20080206-18+lenny1_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ffmpeg-debian_0.svn20080206-18+lenny1_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ffmpeg-debian_0.svn20080206-18+lenny1_s390.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ffmpeg-debian_0.svn20080206-18+lenny1_sparc.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1o3uvu-vh...@ries.debian.org
Re: permission to upload ICU 4.4 to unstable
* Jay Berkenbilt (q...@debian.org) [100418 16:00]: > Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > > > ICU 4.4 was released a few weeks ago. There are very few changes from > > 4.4.rc1. I'm going to do one upload of 4.4 to experimental to make sure > > it builds properly on all platforms. If all goes well, I'd like to go > > ahead and upload to unstable. Please let me know when I can proceed > > with the upgrade. As before, there are no API changes for people who > > stick to published interfaces, so binary NMUs for reverse dependencies > > should be adequate, as it has been for the last few ICU transitions. > > Hello again. I'm still waiting for a response to this. Of course, I > understand that the release team is busy and understaffed, and that you > have to serialize things sometimes, so I'm not complaining... "we confirm that we have seen your request" There is not yet a decision where this is in the queue. Sorry for that. Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100418145758.gb3...@mails.so.argh.org
Re: Status of Squeeze Release Notes
Hi, On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 10:32:49AM +0200, Rainer Dorsch wrote: > I am upgrading a lenny system to squeeze next weekend. Are there already any > release notes which I could test and provide feedback for? There is no version of release-notes dedicated to Squeeze yet. However, a feedback against the last version of Lenny releasenotes would be very useful. http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/releasenotes Please report the feedback against the upgrade-reports pseudopackage by following advices from http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/release-notes/ch-about.fr.html#upgrade-reports Thanks ! -- Simon Paillard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100418160108.gb1...@dedibox.ebzao.info
Re: nfs-kernel-server, 2.6.32 and lenny
On Sun, 2010-04-18 at 13:06 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > I'm intending to upload nfs-utils to stable-proposed-updates with the > following changes, to support partial upgrades (specifically kernel > upgrades). Please ack/nak. > > Ben. > > diff -u nfs-utils-1.1.2/debian/changelog nfs-utils-1.1.2/debian/changelog > --- nfs-utils-1.1.2/debian/changelog > +++ nfs-utils-1.1.2/debian/changelog > @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ > +nfs-utils (1:1.1.2-6lenny2) stable; urgency=low > + > + * Update maintainers and uploaders to match unstable > + * Fix test for NFS kernel server support in init script (Closes: #550153) Please go ahead. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1271609330.6711.29.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net
binNMU kdebindings?
Hi, python-kde4 is currently uninstallable due to invalid dependencies. According to http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=567528#54 a simple rebuild fixed the problem. Thus I want to ask whether it makes sense to binNMU kdebindings because I want to start packaging jockey and due to this bug I cannot do this. Regards, Julian PS. Always CC me, I'm not subscribed to any of the mailing lists. -- Julian Andres Klode - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/. pgpu9kx38hYmW.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: binNMU kdebindings?
On Sun, 2010-04-18 at 19:24 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > python-kde4 is currently uninstallable due to invalid > dependencies. According to > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=567528#54 > a simple rebuild fixed the problem. Which is intriguing, given that it was a binNMU that created the problem in the first place... :-) > Thus I want to ask whether it makes sense to binNMU > kdebindings because I want to start packaging jockey > and due to this bug I cannot do this. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=571924#12 suggests that binNMUs won't help. The dependency chain pulls in the python-sip package rather than python-sip4, yet the shlib generation expects to be able to determine the version of the python-sip4 package; hence the "none" ending up in relations. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1271612971.7747.74.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net
Re: Status of Squeeze Release Notes
On Sun,18.Apr.10, 18:01:08, Simon Paillard wrote: > There is no version of release-notes dedicated to Squeeze yet. Wouldn't it be high time to create it? Regards, Andrei -- Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic signature.asc Description: Digital signature
NEW changes in proposedupdates
Processing changes file: pidgin_2.4.3-4lenny6_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pidgin_2.4.3-4lenny6_alpha.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pidgin_2.4.3-4lenny6_arm.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pidgin_2.4.3-4lenny6_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pidgin_2.4.3-4lenny6_hppa.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pidgin_2.4.3-4lenny6_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pidgin_2.4.3-4lenny6_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pidgin_2.4.3-4lenny6_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pidgin_2.4.3-4lenny6_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pidgin_2.4.3-4lenny6_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pidgin_2.4.3-4lenny6_s390.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pidgin_2.4.3-4lenny6_sparc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: spamass-milter_0.3.1-8+lenny1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: spamass-milter_0.3.1-8+lenny1_alpha.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: spamass-milter_0.3.1-8+lenny1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: spamass-milter_0.3.1-8+lenny1_arm.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: spamass-milter_0.3.1-8+lenny1_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: spamass-milter_0.3.1-8+lenny1_hppa.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: spamass-milter_0.3.1-8+lenny1_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: spamass-milter_0.3.1-8+lenny1_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: spamass-milter_0.3.1-8+lenny1_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: spamass-milter_0.3.1-8+lenny1_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: spamass-milter_0.3.1-8+lenny1_s390.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: spamass-milter_0.3.1-8+lenny1_sparc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: kdebase_3.5.9.dfsg.1-6+lenny1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: kdebase_3.5.9.dfsg.1-6+lenny1_alpha.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: kdebase_3.5.9.dfsg.1-6+lenny1_arm.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: kdebase_3.5.9.dfsg.1-6+lenny1_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: kdebase_3.5.9.dfsg.1-6+lenny1_hppa.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: kdebase_3.5.9.dfsg.1-6+lenny1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: kdebase_3.5.9.dfsg.1-6+lenny1_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: kdebase_3.5.9.dfsg.1-6+lenny1_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: kdebase_3.5.9.dfsg.1-6+lenny1_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: kdebase_3.5.9.dfsg.1-6+lenny1_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: kdebase_3.5.9.dfsg.1-6+lenny1_s390.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: kdebase_3.5.9.dfsg.1-6+lenny1_sparc.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1o3ade-jc...@ries.debian.org
Bug#573486: RM: emacs22/22.3+1-1.2
On 2010-04-18 22:49 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Indeed, emacs22 can be removed now. > > "dak rm -Rn -s testing emacs22" still shows a blocking dep, but that seems > to be a bug, python2.5-doc is built from the source package python2.5 > now, which build-depends on emacs23: > > > Checking reverse dependencies... > # Broken Build-Depends: > python2.5-doc/contrib: emacs22 > > Dependency problem found. > This is not a bug, the python2.5 version that builds python2.5-doc did FTBFS on mips and thus is not yet in testing. Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87aat0jwwd@turtle.gmx.de
Bug#573486: RM: emacs22/22.3+1-1.2
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:59:45AM +0300, Tommi Vainikainen wrote: > Sven Joachim writes: > > It's not so easy since there are a few packages which would be broken: > > ... > > > Note that this comes from xemacs21 not being in testing; the xemacs21 > > maintainer's lack of response to RC bugs suggests that maybe it will not > > be released with squeeze. > > Yesterday xemacs21 entered into testing again, which makes those > packages usable with xemacs21 and without emacs22, so maybe emacs22 can > be now removed from testing. Indeed, emacs22 can be removed now. "dak rm -Rn -s testing emacs22" still shows a blocking dep, but that seems to be a bug, python2.5-doc is built from the source package python2.5 now, which build-depends on emacs23: Checking reverse dependencies... # Broken Build-Depends: python2.5-doc/contrib: emacs22 Dependency problem found. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100418204922.ga3...@galadriel.inutil.org
Re: Status of Squeeze Release Notes
i've upgraded 2 PC's to squeeze and in one of them (the last one recently) i got some problems regarding udev and linux kernel. Linux image needs a newer udev, udev needs an udev (or something like this) enabled kernel. so i forced the installation of both kernel and udev/lib udev and rebooted. just this. i did not filled any bug report because i don't really know if are anyone testing the migration from lenny to squeeze. Luis Matos Dom, 2010-04-18 às 10:32 +0200, Rainer Dorsch escreveu: > Hello, > > I am upgrading a lenny system to squeeze next weekend. Are there already any > release notes which I could test and provide feedback for? > > Thanks, > Rainer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1271619729.3470.2.ca...@piqueno
Re: Status of Squeeze Release Notes
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 20:42:09 +0100, Luis Matos wrote: > i've upgraded 2 PC's to squeeze and in one of them (the last one > recently) i got some problems regarding udev and linux kernel. Linux > image needs a newer udev, udev needs an udev (or something like this) > enabled kernel. > > so i forced the installation of both kernel and udev/lib udev and > rebooted. > This is bug#571255. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#578330: pu: package alien-arena/7.0-1+lenny2
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Severity: normal hi, i've built a proposed update that corrects two security vulnerabilities in the alien-arena package. please review the attached debdiff. thanks, mike alien-arena.debdiff Description: Binary data
Bug#578346: transition: camlp5
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hello, The following packages need to go to testing together: easy camlp5/5.13-1 coq/8.2.pl1+dfsg-6/amd64/8.2.pl1+dfsg-6 coq/8.2.pl1+dfsg-6/armel/8.2.pl1+dfsg-6 coq/8.2.pl1+dfsg-6/hppa/8.2.pl1+dfsg-6 coq/8.2.pl1+dfsg-6/i386/8.2.pl1+dfsg-6 coq/8.2.pl1+dfsg-6/ia64/8.2.pl1+dfsg-6 coq/8.2.pl1+dfsg-6/kfreebsd-amd64/8.2.pl1+dfsg-6 coq/8.2.pl1+dfsg-6/kfreebsd-i386/8.2.pl1+dfsg-6 coq/8.2.pl1+dfsg-6/mips/8.2.pl1+dfsg-6 coq/8.2.pl1+dfsg-6/mipsel/8.2.pl1+dfsg-6 coq/8.2.pl1+dfsg-6/powerpc/8.2.pl1+dfsg-6 coq/8.2.pl1+dfsg-6/s390/8.2.pl1+dfsg-6 coq/8.2.pl1+dfsg-6/sparc/8.2.pl1+dfsg-6 ledit/2.01-6/amd64/2.01-6 ledit/2.01-6/armel/2.01-6 ledit/2.01-6/hppa/2.01-6 ledit/2.01-6/i386/2.01-6 ledit/2.01-6/ia64/2.01-6 ledit/2.01-6/kfreebsd-amd64/2.01-6 ledit/2.01-6/kfreebsd-i386/2.01-6 ledit/2.01-6/mips/2.01-6 ledit/2.01-6/mipsel/2.01-6 ledit/2.01-6/powerpc/2.01-6 ledit/2.01-6/s390/2.01-6 ledit/2.01-6/sparc/2.01-6 ssreflect/1.2+dfsg-4/amd64/1.2+dfsg-4 ssreflect/1.2+dfsg-4/armel/1.2+dfsg-4 ssreflect/1.2+dfsg-4/hppa/1.2+dfsg-4 ssreflect/1.2+dfsg-4/i386/1.2+dfsg-4 ssreflect/1.2+dfsg-4/ia64/1.2+dfsg-4 ssreflect/1.2+dfsg-4/kfreebsd-amd64/1.2+dfsg-4 ssreflect/1.2+dfsg-4/kfreebsd-i386/1.2+dfsg-4 ssreflect/1.2+dfsg-4/mips/1.2+dfsg-4 ssreflect/1.2+dfsg-4/mipsel/1.2+dfsg-4 ssreflect/1.2+dfsg-4/powerpc/1.2+dfsg-4 ssreflect/1.2+dfsg-4/s390/1.2+dfsg-4 ssreflect/1.2+dfsg-4/sparc/1.2+dfsg-4 Thanks in advance, -- Stéphane -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100419063410.25299.75878.report...@korell.up7.fr
