Bug#871760: sgmltools-lite: please transition from jadetex to texlive-formats-extra
Package: sgmltools-lite Version: 3.0.3.0.cvs.20010909-20 Severity: normal Dear maintainer, your package sgmltools-lite declares a relation onto jadetex which has been a transitional package for one and a half years by now. Please update your package dependencies to use the correct texlive-formats-extra We will remove `jadetex' in the near future, but will continue providing it from texlive-formats-extra for some more time Thanks for your cooperation Norbert --- PREINING Norbert http://www.preining.info Accelia Inc. +JAIST +TeX Live +Debian Developer GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13
Bug#871747: qmtest: please transition from jadetex to texlive-formats-extra
Package: qmtest Version: 2.4.1-3 Severity: normal Dear maintainer, your package qmtest declares a relation onto jadetex which has been a transitional package for one and a half years by now. Please update your package dependencies to use the correct texlive-formats-extra We will remove `jadetex' in the near future, but will continue providing it from texlive-formats-extra for some more time Thanks for your cooperation Norbert --- PREINING Norbert http://www.preining.info Accelia Inc. +JAIST +TeX Live +Debian Developer GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13
Bug#871752: sgmltools-lite: please transition from jadetex to texlive-formats-extra
Package: sgmltools-lite Version: 3.0.3.0.cvs.20010909-20 Severity: normal Dear maintainer, your package sgmltools-lite declares a relation onto jadetex which has been a transitional package for one and a half years by now. Please update your package dependencies to use the correct texlive-formats-extra We will remove `jadetex' in the near future, but will continue providing it from texlive-formats-extra for some more time Thanks for your cooperation Norbert --- PREINING Norbert http://www.preining.info Accelia Inc. +JAIST +TeX Live +Debian Developer GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13
Bug#559310: dh_installdefoma creates wrong prerm code
Package: defoma Version: 0.11.10-3 Severity: important >From experimental's lmodern prerm: # Automatically added by dh_installdefoma FILE='/etc/defoma/hints/lmodern.hints' if [ "$1" = remove ]; then test -x `which defoma-font` && defoma-font update lmodern fi # End automatically added section but that generates only: Removing lmodern ... defoma-font [option..] register .. defoma-font [option..] unregister defoma-font [option..] reregister .. defoma-font [option..] purge defoma-font [option..] register-all defoma-font [option..] unregister-all defoma-font [option..] reregister-all defoma-font [option..] purge-all defoma-font [option..] register-one defoma-font [option..] unregister-one defoma-font [option..] reregister-one defoma-font [option..] purge-one dpkg: error processing lmodern (--remove): defoma-font update lmodern is *NOT* a supported way to be called. Please fix that urgently. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages defoma depends on: ii dialog1.1-20080819-1 Displays user-friendly dialog boxe ii file 5.03-3 Determines file type using "magic" ii perl 5.10.1-8 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii whiptail 0.52.10-4.1Displays user-friendly dialog boxe Versions of packages defoma recommends: ii libfont-freetype-perl 0.03-1 Read font files and render glyphs Versions of packages defoma suggests: pn defoma-doc (no description available) pn dfontmgr (no description available) ii psfontmgr 0.11.10-3 PostScript font manager -- part of ii x-ttcidfont-conf 32 TrueType and CID fonts configurati -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Imminent so name bump in libkpathsea
Dear all,
you get this email becasue you are maintaining one or more packages
depending on libkpathsea4. (For Debian QA Group: bibtool).
We are planning to upload TeX Live 2009 packages to unstable rather
soon, which will bring libkpathsea.so.5 and the new -dev.
These packages are already in experimental. It would be nice if you could
check whether your package(s) still builds with libkpathsea.so.5 (what
is expected) or if there are any problems.
Please inform us at debian-tex-ma...@lists.debian.org regarding any problems.
Thanks a lot and all the best
Norbert
Norbert Preiningprein...@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, JapanTU Wien, Austria Debian TeX Task Force
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
SKENFRITH (n.)
The flakes of athlete's foot found inside socks.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#338597: lmodern is unusable with context from the latest teTeX.
On Fre, 11 Nov 2005, Konstantinos Koukopoulos wrote: > The CONTEXT distribution that is contained in the above tetex packages > requires the lmodern fonts in EC encoding. Unfortunately the lmodern package I am thinking about adopting this package. If you in dire need, you can try deb http://www.tug.org/texlive/Debian/ lmodern/ deb-src http://www.tug.org/texlive/Debian/ lmodern/ But please report back ... Best wishes Norbert --- Dr. Norbert Preining Università di Siena gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094 --- YONKERS (n.) (Rare.) The combined thrill of pain and shame when being caught in public plucking your nostril-hairs and stuffing them into your side-pocket. --- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#447106: vim-latexsuite doc not available
Package: vim-latexsuite Version: 20060325-5 Followup-For: Bug #447106 after running helpztags /usr/share/vim/addons/doc as root the documentation is still not available. $ ls -l /usr/share/vim/addons/doc/ total 128 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1995 2008-04-19 16:10 imaps.txt.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 27734 2008-04-19 16:10 latexhelp.txt.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6714 2008-04-19 16:10 latex-suite-quickstart.txt.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 41712 2008-04-19 16:10 latex-suite.txt.gz lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root30 2008-04-16 19:19 matchit.txt -> ../../vim71/macros/matchit.txt -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 42109 2008-04-20 20:41 tags Hope that this helps -- Package-specific info: Vim related packages installed on this system: - vim-latexsuite - vim-runtime -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.25 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=en_US.ISO-8859-15, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO-8859-15 (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages vim-latexsuite depends on: ii python 2.5.2-1 An interactive high-level object-o ii vim 1:7.1.293-1 Vi IMproved - enhanced vi editor ii vim-common 1:7.1.293-1 Vi IMproved - Common files ii vim-gnome [vim-python] 1:7.1.293-1 Vi IMproved - enhanced vi editor - Versions of packages vim-latexsuite recommends: ii texlive-base-bin 2007.dfsg.1-2 TeX Live: Essential binaries ii vim-addon-manager 0.4 manager of addons for the Vim edit -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#389163: How to handle filename conflict "aleph" (Packages aleph, tetex-bin, texlive-bin)?
On Sam, 16 Dez 2006, Steve Langasek wrote: > > 3) Retain aleph, and change the name of the binary in one package or the > > other. If we don't do (2), and the release team is not happy with (1), > > then this is obviously the right course. I don't care at all which > > program's name is changed or what it's changed to. What are the pros > > and cons? > > Sounds like this is the way to go. THis name change is currently under discussion in the tex-live (upstream) mailing list with the original authors participating. As soon as we have come to a conclusion there it will be executed in Debian. Best wishes Norbert --- Dr. Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Università di Siena Debian Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian TeX Group gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094 --- SWANIBOST (adj.) Complete shagged out after a hard day having income tax explained to you. --- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#389163: How to handle filename conflict "aleph" (Packages aleph, tetex-bin, texlive-bin)?
On Sam, 16 Dez 2006, Frank Küster wrote: > > THis name change is currently under discussion in the tex-live > > (upstream) mailing list with the original authors participating. As soon > > as we have come to a conclusion there it will be executed in Debian. > > Sorry, aren't the texlive people talking about mex? I always thought > that it was settled that aleph "belongs" to the TeX community, and the > programming language is "afnix"? Damned, you are right, I mixed this. So we have aleph(texlive-omega,tetex-bin) vs. aleph(aleph) and mex(texlive-lang-polish) vs. mex(octave) Umpf... Best wishes Norbert --- Dr. Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Università di Siena Debian Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian TeX Group gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094 --- `I am so amazingly cool you could keep a side of meat in me for a month. I am so hip I have difficulty seeing over my pelvis.' --- Zaphod being cool. --- Douglas Adams, The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#389163: How to handle filename conflict "aleph" (Packages aleph, tetex-bin, texlive-bin)?
On Mon, 18 Dez 2006, Frank Küster wrote: > No, we don't have any problems (for etch): > > - aleph has been removed and will probably be reintroduced as afnix Good. > - octave uses /usr/bin/mex2.1 True, I already have removed the conflict some time ago, but forgot it ;-) > We should, however, contact the octave people about the possible > conflict, perhaps with a wishlist bug "Please don't use /usr/bin/mex". Good idea ... Best wishes Norbert --- Dr. Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Università di Siena Debian Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian TeX Group gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094 --- YATE (n.) Dishearteningly white piece of bread which sits limply in a pop-up toaster during a protracted throcking (q.v.) session. --- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#816517: ulem.sty from texlive-generic- recommended
Hi all, > Is there a strong reason you moved ulem.sty into texlive-generic- recommended > ? It was *never* moved there, the problem is during the incorporation of the separate packages the one dependency on texlive-generic-recommended got lost. ulem.sty was *always* in tl-generic-recommended. The fixed package is already in preparation, as I wrote already. > kpathsea: Running mktexfmt pdfjadetex.fmt THis is again a failure of the dependency. Sorry about that. > Norbert, have you seen this kind of failure before? I wonder if you > have recommendations how to fix this issue. Either add temporarily texlive-generic-recommended as dep/build-dep, or wait until I have uploaded the new package. Norbert ---- PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13
Bug#816517: ulem.sty from texlive-generic- recommended
Hi all, > or wait until I have uploaded the new package. Which has happened just now, so should be available in a day. Simply closing the FTBFS after a pbuilder/cowbuilder check should suffice. No need for new uploads. Or you reassign to texlive-htmlxml and merge with the closed bug 816584 where exactly this probelms was described and explained. Thanks Norbert ---- PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13
Bug#976586: Bug#976405: Bug#976495: also happens on amd64, should be worked around by 1.8.20-5 but the real fix will come with 1.8.20-6
Hi thanks for the digging through the errors. > < texlive-base_2020.20200925-1 > --- > > texlive-base_2020.20201203-2 > Also, I noticed a few new latex-related failures in this archive rebuild. [...] It seems that something in the interface with hyperref has changed. Unfortunately the docbook/jadetex stuff is rather cryptic to deciper and hardly possible to get a *minimal* example. If someone can send me a minimal (as far as possible) input file, and the list of commands necessary to run (openjade/doxy/whatever) I can look into the old/new code and contact the upupstream authors. Best Norbert -- PREINING Norbert https://www.preining.info Accelia Inc. + IFMGA ProGuide + TU Wien + JAIST + TeX Live + Debian Dev GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13
