Bug#736596: [src:haxe] Sourceless file

2014-01-25 Thread bastien ROUCARIES
Package: src:haxe 
Version:   1:3.0.0~svn6707-4
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: source-contains-prebuilt-javascript-object
X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@debian.org

I could not found the source of:
haxe 1:3.0.0~svn6707-4 (source)

std/js/jquery-latest.min.js

Bastien


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4010990.vbqMhKTjph@bastien-debian



Bug#744315: [docvert] [DFSG] missing source

2014-04-12 Thread bastien ROUCARIES
Package: docvert
Severity: serious
version: 4.0-7 
user: debian...@lists.debian.org
usertags: source-is-missing
X-Debbugs-CC:  ftpmas...@debian.org

Hi,

Your package seems to include some files that lack sources
in prefered forms of modification:

core/lib/fckeditor/editor/js/fckeditorcode_gecko.js
core/lib/fckeditor/editor/js/fckeditorcode_ie.js
core/lib/fckeditor/editor/dialog/fck_universalkey/data.js

You could in this case purge fckeditor and use in tree package.

According to Debian Free Software Guidelines [1] (DFSG) §2: 
 "The program must include source code, and must allow distribution 
  in source code as well as compiled form.".

This could also constitute a license violation for some copyleft licenses such 
as the GNU GPL.

In order to solve this problem, you could:
1. repack the origin tarball adding the missing source to it.
2  add the source files to "debian/missing-sources" directory

Both way satisfies the requirement that we ship the source. Second option
might be preferable due to the following reasons [2]:
 - Upstream can do it too and you could even supply a patch to them, thus full 
filling our social contract [3], see particularly §2.
 - If source and non-source are in different locations, ftpmasters may
   miss the source and (needlessly) reject the package.
 - The source isn't duplicated in every .diff.gz/.debian.tar.* (though
   this only really matters for larger sources).

You could also ask debian-qa for more guidance.

[1] https://www.debian.org/social_contract.en.html#guidelines
[2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736873#8
[3] https://www.debian.org/social_contract



--- Please enter the report below this line. ---


--- System information. ---
Architecture: amd64
Kernel:   Linux 3.13-1-amd64

Debian Release: jessie/sid

--- Package information. ---
Package's Depends field is empty.

Package's Recommends field is empty.

Package's Suggests field is empty.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1947692.P2IaKgFY3W@bastien-debian



Bug#725423: Forwarded

2014-04-17 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
control: forwarded -1 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725423

I plan to adopt it.

Bastien


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/cae2spaycrgbie3ihdwm-kaq_7yncwcaq5vrnhqplwstf_0e...@mail.gmail.com



Bug#725423: Forwarded

2014-04-19 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/HaxeFoundation/haxe/issues/2897
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Control: notforwarded -1
>
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 08:48:47PM +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
>> control: forwarded -1 
>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725423
>
> You'd probably want to forward it to
>
> http://code.google.com/p/haxe/issues/list

No it is old site.

>> I plan to adopt it.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> G..e


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/CAE2SPAarFzmRZsLiiQdDHo15vT2ZRLD1CiFhawJeEX0kR=m...@mail.gmail.com



Bug#745289: Please clarify BSD license of objsize (dual licensed under GPL so safe from DFSG point fo view

2014-04-20 Thread bastien ROUCARIES
Package: src:haxe
Version: 1:3.0.0~svn6707-4
Severity: wishlist

The objsize library is licenced under dual GPL/BSD.

But it does not link to license for BSD. 

This bug is a remainder, it will be forwarded to upstream.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1490731.TAZdmXu7vf@bastien-debian



Bug#725423: Forwarded

2014-04-21 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Do you want to join the package maintainance of haxe BTW ?

I see you have opened a collab-maint git tree, do you still care about it ?

Bastien

On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Bastien ROUCARIES
 wrote:
> control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/HaxeFoundation/haxe/issues/2897
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Control: notforwarded -1
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 08:48:47PM +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
>>> control: forwarded -1 
>>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725423
>>
>> You'd probably want to forward it to
>>
>> http://code.google.com/p/haxe/issues/list
>
> No it is old site.
>
>>> I plan to adopt it.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> --
>> G..e


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/cae2spaya+8dgmkrix8acsfsfxaw67udkvsvj+uw7mxv134a...@mail.gmail.com



Bug#625546: transition: libmagick4

2011-05-04 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Package: gnuift
Severity: wishlist
block: 625544


Hi,

We would like to perform the transition from  libmagickcore3, libmagick++3, 
libmagickwand3 to libmagickcore4, libmagick++4, 
libmagickwand4

This transition will requires sourcefull uploads as there is a (minimal) API 
change.

Packages are in experimental

Thanks

Bastien




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201105041242.38307.roucaries.bast...@gmail.com



Bug#625582: transition: libmagick4

2011-05-04 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Package: synfig
Severity: wishlish
block: 625544


Hi,

We would like to perform the transition from  libmagickcore3, libmagick++3, 
libmagickwand3 to libmagickcore4, libmagick++4, 
libmagickwand4

This transition will requires sourcefull uploads as there is a (minimal) API 
change.

Packages are in experimental

Thanks

Bastien




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201105041435.11168.roucaries.bast...@gmail.com



Bug#625546: Transition

2011-05-04 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Notice that in this package case a binnmu will not be sufficient. You should 
depend on libmagickcore-dev or libmagickwand-dev.

Bastien



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/201105041521.58319.roucaries.bastien+deb...@gmail.com



Bug#646555: enchant: Spellcheck missing dependency

2011-10-28 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
I have planned to do some work on enchant.

But upstream is not really nice.

- First plugin system is not nice they are some circular dep
- Secondly for a general purpose lib they use gtk and thus increase
reverse dep. I will prefer pure C for the main part of enchant. And
upstream refuse my patch

Bastien

On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Agustin Martin  wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 02:34:24AM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
>> On 26/10/2011 18:47, Agustin Martin wrote:
>> > I'd put the dependency on (myspell|aspell|ispell|hunspell)-dictionary.
>> > Committed that change to enchant collab-maint git repo.
>> >
>> > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/enchant.git;a=commit;h=df7f2c6e709abfca052024ef7f9a4d2974e62991
>>
>> Thanks for the fix.
>>
>> > Note that enchant is orphaned. I will not upload inmediately, but would 
>> > like
>> > to first prepare a new QA upload with some fixes in manpages. This change
>> > will go with it.
>>
>> Regarding that, it looks like Bastien ROUCARIES wants to adopt the package, 
>> as
>> mentioned on the O: bug[1].
>
> Thanks for the pointer, cc'ing him. This ITA was not shown in the PTS
> because bug title was not renamed. Bastien, if you still want to adopt
> the package please set yourself as #580680 owner and retitle it to
>
> ITA: enchant -- a wrapper library for various spell checkers
>
>> It might be a good idea to check with him before uploading.
>
> Yes, I will contact Bastien before further commits.
>
>> Otherwise, if nobody else steps up to adopt this package, I can look into
>> adopting it myself, seeing as I'm maintainer of geany-plugins which uses it.
>
> Besides some recent commits and a QA upload, I enabled VCS notification for
> enchant collab-maint git repo through the PTS, if the cvs/vcs notification
> option has been selected during PTS package subscription.
>
> If you are already subscribed to enchant package through the PTS and have
> that option enabled, you should have received info about those commits.
> If subscribed but did not receive those messages and want to follow them,
> should (re-)subscribe making sure that cvs notification option is enabled.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Agustin
>



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAE2SPAaywaUr9H7FJWsPz6QeYwW=apH4Lkdb96q_V9ZU=wf...@mail.gmail.com



Bug#712393: Ambiguous License about gfdl

2013-06-15 Thread bastien ROUCARIES
Package: oidentd
Severity: important

The license text is ambiguous:
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.1
or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation;
with the Invariant Sections being no invariant sections, with the
Front-Cover Texts being no front-cover texts, and with the Back-Cover
Texts being no back-cover texts. A copy of the license is included in the
section entitled "GNU Free Documentation License".

Please ask upstream to use the official wording;
 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this
  document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
  Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software
  Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts and
  no Back-Cover Texts.  A copy of the license is included in the
  section entitled "GNU Free Documentation License"


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201306151733.57851.roucaries.bast...@gmail.com



Bug#870338: CVE-2017-11549

2018-06-26 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
CVE-2017-11549 is not a bug perse but a feature. A midi file could
have infinite loop on it, see

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081694

Bastien