Bug#272426: is non-free

2004-09-19 Thread Wouter Verhelst
Package: atmelwlandriver-source
Version: 2.1.1-4
Severity: serious

The atmelwlandriver-source package contains some firmware header
files, which have a non-free license. As an example, from the file
src/includes/usb/internal505.h:

/**/
/**/
/*Copyright (c) 1999-2000 by Atmel Corporation*/
/**/
/*  This software is copyrighted by and is the sole property of Atmel */
/*  Corporation.  All rights, title, ownership, or other interests*/
/*  in the software remain the property of Atmel Corporation.  This   */
/*  software may only be used in accordance with the corresponding*/
/*  license agreement.  Any un-authorized use, duplication, transmission, */
/*  distribution, or disclosure of this software is expressly forbidden.  */
/**/
/*  This Copyright notice may not be removed or modified without prior*/
/*  written consent of Atmel Corporation. */
/**/
/*  Atmel Corporation, Inc. reserves the right to modify this software*/
/*  without notice.   */
/**/
/*  Atmel Corporation.*/
/*  2325 Orchard Parkway   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   */
/*  San Jose, CA 95131 http://www.atmel.com   */
/**/
/**/

This does not even approximate Free Software, thus, it shouldn't be in
main.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8.1
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Versions of packages atmelwlandriver-source depends on:
hi  debhelper   4.2.20   helper programs for debian/rules
ii  perl5.8.4-2.2Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 
ii  wireless-tools  26+27pre25-2 Tools for manipulating Linux Wirel

-- no debconf information



Re: 185 Packages that look orphaned

2004-01-27 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 12:58:33AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I looked through the differences between testing and unstable and
> picked out everything older than 100 days. Reasons why those packages
> are not in testing are:
> 
> - non-free / contrib packages nobody tried to compile
> - FTBFS or RC bugs
> - possibly failure of the testing script to detect it
> - other packages hold you back (get involved in those other packages)

You should really have looked through the list before spamming such a
huge amount of people.

> kernel-image-2.2.25-mac-udeb

This one is made to make d-i possible for m68k. However, as m68k doesn't
have a usable debian-installer yet (which I'm sure you know), this can't
go in yet.

-- 
Wouter Verhelst
Debian GNU/Linux -- http://www.debian.org
Nederlandstalige Linux-documentatie -- http://nl.linux.org
"Stop breathing down my neck." "My breathing is merely a simulation."
"So is my neck, stop it anyway!"
  -- Voyager's EMH versus the Prometheus' EMH, stardate 51462.



Bug#238470: vte: FTBFS: missing b-dep on gnome-pkg-tools

2004-03-17 Thread Wouter Verhelst
Package: vte
Version: 1:0.11.10-5

There was an error trying to autobuild your package on the m68k
architecture. From the build log:

Automatic build of vte_1:0.11.10-5 on quickstep by sbuild/m68k 1.170.5
Build started at 20040317-0420
**
[...]
Build-Depends: cdbs, debhelper (>= 3.4.4), libgtk2.0-dev (>= 2.2.0), gettext, 
python-gtk2-dev, python-dev, libncurses5-dev, libxrender-dev
[...]
dpkg-buildpackage: source package is vte
dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 1:0.11.10-5
dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture is m68k
 sudo debian/rules clean
debian/rules:12: /usr/share/gnome-pkg-tools/1/rules/uploaders.mk: No such file 
or directory
make: *** No rule to make target 
`/usr/share/gnome-pkg-tools/1/rules/uploaders.mk'.  Stop.
[...]

looks like you need to declare an additional build-depenedency on
gnome-pkg-tools.

-- 
Wouter Verhelst
Debian GNU/Linux -- http://www.debian.org
Nederlandstalige Linux-documentatie -- http://nl.linux.org
"Stop breathing down my neck." "My breathing is merely a simulation."
"So is my neck, stop it anyway!"
  -- Voyager's EMH versus the Prometheus' EMH, stardate 51462.