Bug#277690: snacc: FTBFS patch
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 11:10:47AM -0700, Larry Doolittle wrote: > turn up the gcc warning level and clean up the code base. Is this > code maintained upstream? Yes and no. A new version is maintained as "eSnacc" (enhanced snacc), but it's very different from the original snacc. Partly because the new upstream seems to be more interested in win32 than other platforms. I don't know whether eSnacc could replace snacc in Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#277690: Please apply proposed fix
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 03:41:11PM +0200, Harald Welte wrote: > Even though the original codebase might be unclean, and it is uncertain > whether snacc should be replaced by eSnacc, I don't see any reason why > this proposed bugfix is not applied to make the package build. > > Other packages have build-dependencies on snacc (I originally just > wanted to compile kismet on amd64)... Sorry for the late reply: The reason for the delay is that snacc is orphaned and neither the to-be maintainer, Martin von Loewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, nor the ex-maintainer (me) seem to have much time. Now we have to wait for the Big C++ ABI Bang anyway, so don't expect any action before that smoke evaporated. Cheers, WB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307760: snacc: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): 'EOC' was not declared in this scope
Quoting Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > In case somebody is interested in snacc: Most of the bugs are supposed > to be fixed in Ubuntu. > > http://people.ubuntu.com/~scott/patches/snacc/ Thanks, if nobody else is faster I'll upload in some days. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#229595: unicode/utf-8 support desperately missing
The problem becomes worse: Fortunately, with etch Debian becomes UTF-8 by default, but neither a2ps nor enscript can handle it. cedilla needs nearly 12 MB of CLisp plus 25 MB TeX stuff, which makes it a little bit heavy-weight, but at least it works... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
