Re: Accepted fte 0.50.2b6-9 (source) into unstable

2016-03-28 Thread SamuelOPH
Hi Axel,

Thanks for pointing, I should've mention just "Change to use the same as
Vcs-Git".

I'm gonna pay more attention to my changelogs.

Also, thanks for importing my changes to the package's git repository.



Samuel Henrique O. P. [samueloph]

2016-03-28 8:06 GMT-03:00 Axel Beckert :

> Hi Samuel,
>
> I've imported your upload into the package's git repository and pushed
> it to Alioth:
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/fte.git/commit/?id=6954b1a6
>
> A few more comments about your fte upload:
>
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 11:33:57PM +, Samuel Henrique Oltramari Pinto
> wrote:
> >  - Vcs-Browser: Correct url and use the same as Vcs-Git.
>
> There was nothing to "correct". It was working before since /cgit/ and
> /git/ are equivalent and AFAIK none of them is preferred yet. So I
> think it is rather bold to claim that URL has been "corrected".
>
> Historically seen /cgit/ was working before /git/ was working. So many
> packages use /cgit/ instead of /git/.
>
> >  - Add DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS variable to improve the GCC hardening.
> >  - Add DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND variable to avoid useless dependency.
>
> Thanks for these!
>
> Actually these made me aware that there is an easy fix for these
> "package could avoid a useless dependency" warnings. :-)
>
> Kind regards, Axel
> --
> /~\  Plain Text Ribbon Campaign   | Axel Beckert
> \ /  Say No to HTML in E-Mail and News| a...@deuxchevaux.org
> (Mail)
>  X   See http://www.nonhtmlmail.org/campaign.html | a...@noone.org
> (Mail+Jabber)
> / \  I love long mails: http://email.is-not-s.ms/ | http://abe.noone.org/
> (Web)
>


Bug#819418: fte: watch file broken

2016-03-28 Thread SamuelOPH
Hi Axel,

Samuel Henrique Oltramari Pinto wrote with subject "Accepted fte
> 0.50.2b6-9 (source) into unstable)":
> >* debian/watch: Create.
>
> This is contra-productive. :-(
>>
>
I'm sorry, what should i have write on the changelog instead? I thought the
creation of watch file didn't need a detailed changelog because its purpose
is always the same and the only difference would be the regex, watch
version and url, also the changes would easily be recognizable because the
file didn't exist before, should've detailed/explained the watch entirely?

https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/fte now claims that there is a new
> upstream release while there isn't.
>
> fte upstream has the annoying behaviour to _not_ put the version
> number but the release date into the tar ball file names which is why
> there never has been a watch file in the past. See
> /usr/share/doc/fte/changelog.gz:
>

Wow, that was a very silly mistake. I think i didn't pay attention to uscan
output when testing the watch file, I won't let this happen again.

I'm tempted to do another QA upload to fix this false positive. The
> other option would be to either remove the watch file or the comment
> out its content.


Thanks for fixing my mistake.


Samuel Henrique O. P. [samueloph]

2016-03-28 7:50 GMT-03:00 Axel Beckert :

> Package: fte
> Version: 0.50.2b6-9
>
> Hi,
>
> Samuel Henrique Oltramari Pinto wrote with subject "Accepted fte
> 0.50.2b6-9 (source) into unstable)":
> >* debian/watch: Create.
>
> This is contra-productive. :-(
>
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/fte now claims that there is a new
> upstream release while there isn't.
>
> fte upstream has the annoying behaviour to _not_ put the version
> number but the release date into the tar ball file names which is why
> there never has been a watch file in the past. See
> /usr/share/doc/fte/changelog.gz:
>
>   0.50.2b6 --  2011
>   […]
>   0.50.2b5 -- March 2010
>
> Hence we _cannot_ check for new versions with watch files unless we
> change the version number of the package. I recommend to _not_ change
> the version number to only use the date based numbers. A proper
> upstream version number which would work with an according watch file
> would be e.g.
>
>   0.50.2b6-20110708
>
> I'm tempted to do another QA upload to fix this false positive. The
> other option would be to either remove the watch file or the comment
> out its content.
>
> Regards, Axel
> --
>  ,''`.  |  Axel Beckert , http://people.debian.org/~abe/
> : :' :  |  Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
> `. `'   |  4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329  6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
>   `-|  1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486  202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
>