Bug#311597: Busy at work packaging anyterm

2005-09-13 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
Phil,

I am busy working on packaging anyterm.  I was wondering if you could
look at the desicussion we had on #debian-devel tonight.  Essentially,
we need to figure out a better way to make the login process happen.
Also, why does anygetty need to write to utmp instead of letting login
do that?

Please let me know what you think, as I would really like to get this
packaged up and in the official archive.

-Roberto

-- 
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto


irc.log.bz2
Description: Binary data


pgpPlxnPvbuyO.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Maintenance of the Drupal package

2006-12-30 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 10:49:58PM +0100, Sven Herzberg wrote:
> 
>   As you are currently listed in the Maintainer field of the current
> Debian package I'd like to know whether there's someone in your team who
> would advocate a Debian developer application so I can walk through the
> new maintainer process with an updated drupal package.
> 

You don't need someone from the QA team to advocate or sponsor you.  Any
Debian developer can do that.

Regards,

-Roberto
-- 
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#368515: Removal of libgtk1.2 python bindings (meta-bug)

2006-05-22 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
Loïc Minier wrote:
> 
>  This only shows xkeysw-config, gnome-tasksel, sql-editor, scigraphica,
>  pydict, icepref, iceme, and gaby.  This is quite reasonable.
> 

The icepref and iceme packages are long obsolete and dead upstream.
They are also orphaned.  I expressed and intent to adopt a while back to
replace them with icewmcp (which I was intending to package), since I
was going to use them in a deployment at my church.  However, I ended up
not using IceWM.  If no one steps forward to take care of this (package
icewmcp is a replacement for icepref and iceme), I can probably do it in
the next couple of months.

-Roberto

-- 
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#392694: Package htdig has removed data in /var/www

2006-10-12 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 11:00:02PM +0200, Urs Stotz wrote:
> Package: htdig
> Version: 1:3.1.6-11
> Severity: serious
> Maintainer: Robert Ribnitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Architecture: i386
> Filename: pool/main/h/htdig/htdig_3.1.6-11_i386.deb
> 
> as I removed htdig with dpkg -P htdig
> the debian packege removed the datas in /var/www
> 
> dpkg -P htdig
> (Reading database ... 60555 files and directories currently installed.)
> Removing htdig ...
> Purging configuration files for htdig ...
> dpkg - warning: while removing htdig, directory `/var/www' not empty so not 
> removed.
> dpkg - warning: while removing htdig, directory `/var/lib/htdig' not empty so 
> not 
> 
> realy bad!
> 
Umm. Did it actually remove anything?  The maintainer probably listed
var/www in the dirs for the package, which means, that on install, if
the directory is missing for some odd reason, it will be created.  On
removal or purge (or both, I forget), it will try and remove the
directory.  However, if there is anything in the directory, it will not
be removed.  That is warning you are seeing.  Please verify that it
*actually* removed stuff from /var/www, which I suspect it did not.  If
it did not, please close the bug report.  If it did, then good catch.

Regards,

-Roberto

-- 
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#392694: Package htdig has removed data in /var/www

2006-10-12 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 01:52:23AM +0200, Urs Stotz wrote:
> Hi Roberto
> 
> thank you for your mail!
> 
No problem.

> now I see, I don't loose the data.
> /var/www was a link to /data/www on my system.
> After purging htdig, the debian package was removing the link
> and creating a new /var/www directory.
> I has meant the data are removed but realy only the link was removed.
> 
> This is not the same problem as I has written in the bug report.
> But I see no reason for this behavior.
> 
> You think I should close my bug report?
> 
No.  I asked on #debian-devel and the consensus is that what the htdig
package did was wrong.  It should not have removed the /var/www symlink
and recreated the directory empty.  This is in fact a serious bug.

Regards,

-Roberto

-- 
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature