Bug#294221: prcs: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): no matching function for call to '__gnu_cxx::stdio_filebuf
Andreas, Thanks for this bug report and also for Bug#287958. You perhaps noticed already that the prcs package is orphaned (see Bug#293805[1]), so I will not react to bug reports unless there is a release-critical problem and the fix is trivial. That said, if you think you can take over the package maintenance, please do it. I would sponsor you if necessary. -- Rafael [1] http://bugs.debian.org/293805 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#406815: jedstate: jed doesn't read scripts inside /etc/jed-init.d/
package jedstate severity 406815 serious thanks * Martin Reising <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-14 11:21]: > Package: jedstate > Version: 0.5.4-6 > Severity: important > > Since 0.99.18-2 jed uses startup script inside /etc/jed.d/ instead of > /etc/jed-init.d/. So 99jedstate_hook.sl should be moved into > /etc/jed.d/ and /etc/jed-init.d/ should be removed if empty. I am raising the severity of this bug report to serious, such that the bug will become RC and we have a chance of getting it fixed in etch. The funcionalities of the jedstate package have been superseded by the gdbmrecent module included in the jed-extra package. Besides that, the jedstate package has been orphaned half a year ago and there is no sign of upstream activity since ages. Instead of simply requesting the removal of jedstate from the Debian distribution, the Debian JED Group [1] will adopt the package and transform it into a transition package to allow users migrate from jedstate to gdbmrecent. -- Rafael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]