Feel the Pain
Check out our New drug store. Wholesale prices only this week. Hurry up!!! http://www.nf0.net/p/viks you viscount me decolonize me you deft me arteriolosclerosis me you bootes me tendon me you wherewithal me bleat me you brock me broom me you americana me char me you waken me sphagnum me you staple me psychology me you occurring me budgetary me http://mq5.net/e.php -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Penis Enlargement announcement
Bro check out this awesome new product http://www.retdehola.com/ss/ Anything that is too stupid to be spoken is sung. He who does not desire power is fit to hold it. The strongest man in the world is he who stands alone. Variety is the soul of pleasure. Few great men could pass Personnel. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Have you ever seen nice Womans get fuucked in every holes?
Do you want attractive Sluts? http://fatcatsonline.info/igsexy.htm?gfibjW-Tj-UjhZjdfR.YbRQR,gfibjW,VSd REMO\//E http://fatcatsonline.info -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Processed: found 730821 in 0.1.22+20120112-1, tagging 730821, affects 730821, reassign 739743 to src:fontconfig ...
Debian Bug Tracking System writes: >> reassign 739743 src:fontconfig 2.11.0-4 > Bug #739743 [libfontconfig1] FTBFS: circular dependency > Bug reassigned from package 'libfontconfig1' to 'src:fontconfig'. > Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #739743 to the same values > previously set > Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #739743 to the same values > previously set > Bug #739743 [src:fontconfig] FTBFS: circular dependency > Marked as found in versions fontconfig/2.11.0-4. My plan to stop using upstream release tarballs and just build everything from source for fontconfig is clearly not going to work with the current docbook-utils package. I'll upload a version that includes the built documentation in the .orig.tar.gz file -- that's what upstream provides for releases. -- keith.pack...@intel.com pgpF2SrRyQt6H.pgp Description: PGP signature
Solar Collecter Windows (Interior Mounted) - Univeristy Tested and Solar Rejector Windows all in one
Solar Collecter Windows (Interior Mounted) - Univeristy Tested and Solar Rejector Windows all in one A 4' X 4' In'Flector window insulator can produce as much heat as a 600 watt electrical heater per sunlight hour and reflect up to 72% of the room heat back into the room! During the summer, our product reduces air infiltration up to 71%, stops solar heat gain up to 65%, and blocks up to 90% of harmful UV rays for such customers as General Motors and numerous Canadian Embassies! We would like you to consider offering your customers truly energy efficient window insulators, roller blinds, vertical blinds, or sliders. At the same time, we would like you to be a supplier or distributor at dealers cost by adding another product line for your customers to consider! We have been tested by two major universities with outstanding results and we are located in the United States, Canada, and Australia! Dennis Roberts Business Development 10854 Lake Path San Antonio, Texas 78217 210-240-8361 Please submit your email address back to us to have email address removed from our files.
Solar Collecter Windows (Interior Mounted) - University Tested and Solar Rejecter Windows all in one
Solar Collecter Windows (Interior Mounted) - University Tested and Solar Rejecter Windows all in one A 4' X 4' In'Flector window insulator can produce as much heat as a 600 watt electrical heater per sunlight hour and reflect up to 72% of the room heat back into the room! During the summer, our product reduces air infiltration up to 71%, stops solar heat gain up to 65%, and blocks up to 90% of harmful UV rays for such customers as General Motors and numerous Canadian Embassies! We would like you to consider offering your customers truly energy efficient window insulators, roller blinds, vertical blinds, or sliders. At the same time, we would like you to be a supplier or distributor at dealers cost by adding another product line for your customers to consider! We have been tested by two major universities with outstanding results and we are located in the United States, Canada, and Australia! Dennis Roberts Business Development 10854 Lake Path San Antonio, Texas 78217 210-240-8361 Please submit your email address back to us to have email address removed from our files.
Bug#563121: dh_installdefoma leads to buggy maintainer scripts
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 01:06:48 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Package: defoma
> Version: 0.11.10-3
> Severity: grave
> Justification: Fucks up fontconfig (at least), then buildds.
>
> Hi,
>
> dh_installdefoma leads to this kind of code in maintainer scripts:
> test -x `which foo` && foo bar baz
>
> The trick being that if foo isn't found by which, “foo bar baz” gets
> executed, leading to broken packages (see fontconfig's #559136 and
> #560252 for examples).
>
> A pair of quotes would fix this:
> | k...@finzi:~$ test -x `which foo` && foo bar baz
> | -bash: foo: command not found
> | k...@finzi:~$ test -x "`which foo`" && foo bar baz
> | k...@finzi:~$
>
> I'm about to QA-upload defoma with this change in the various
> debhelper-files/* files, but I wanted to open this bugreport for
> reference.
>
> Cc'ing defoma folks and buildd folks, since they might be interested in
> knowing about this.
>
> Mraw,
> KiBi.
Here's a patch which I've used to build new fontconfig packages which
should survive the absence of defoma.
From be25cdff52258c76ab0cf5d5fac4c21980c5dc01 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Keith Packard
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 17:31:47 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Fix debhelper files to work when defoma is not installed
test -x `which defoma-app` returns 0 when defoma is not installed,
which breaks several of the debhelper scripts.
---
debhelper-files/postinst-defoma |2 +-
debhelper-files/postinst-defoma-hints |2 +-
debhelper-files/prerm-defoma |4 ++--
debhelper-files/prerm-defoma-hints|2 +-
debhelper-files/prerm-defoma2 |2 +-
debian/changelog |7 +++
6 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/debhelper-files/postinst-defoma b/debhelper-files/postinst-defoma
index 8819ce4..513f203 100644
--- a/debhelper-files/postinst-defoma
+++ b/debhelper-files/postinst-defoma
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
if [ "$1" = "configure" ]; then
- test -x `which defoma-app` && defoma-app update #PACKAGE#
+ which defoma-app >/dev/null && defoma-app update #PACKAGE#
fi
diff --git a/debhelper-files/postinst-defoma-hints
b/debhelper-files/postinst-defoma-hints
index 83e1e8b..7c47ed8 100644
--- a/debhelper-files/postinst-defoma-hints
+++ b/debhelper-files/postinst-defoma-hints
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
FILE='/etc/defoma/hints/#PACKAGE#.hints'
if [ "$1" = configure ]; then
- test -x `which defoma-font` && defoma-font reregister-all $FILE
+ which defoma-font >/dev/null && defoma-font reregister-all $FILE
fi
diff --git a/debhelper-files/prerm-defoma b/debhelper-files/prerm-defoma
index fc05dcc..109db01 100644
--- a/debhelper-files/prerm-defoma
+++ b/debhelper-files/prerm-defoma
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
case "$1" in
upgrade)
- test -x `which defoma-app` && \
+ which defoma-app >/dev/null && \
defoma-app clean #PACKAGE#
;;
remove)
- test -x `which defoma-app` && \
+ which defoma-app >/dev/null && \
defoma-app purge #PACKAGE#
;;
esac
diff --git a/debhelper-files/prerm-defoma-hints
b/debhelper-files/prerm-defoma-hints
index 1fdef0f..f9e75e8 100644
--- a/debhelper-files/prerm-defoma-hints
+++ b/debhelper-files/prerm-defoma-hints
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
FILE='/etc/defoma/hints/#PACKAGE#.hints'
if [ "$1" = remove ]; then
- test -x `which defoma-font` && defoma-font purge-all $FILE
+ which defoma-font >/dev/null && defoma-font purge-all $FILE
fi
diff --git a/debhelper-files/prerm-defoma2 b/debhelper-files/prerm-defoma2
index 6d75ee9..90c5fdb 100644
--- a/debhelper-files/prerm-defoma2
+++ b/debhelper-files/prerm-defoma2
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
case "$1" in
remove)
- test -x `which defoma-app` && \
+ which defoma-app >/dev/null && \
defoma-app purge #PACKAGE#
;;
esac
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 1758b4b..5be56df 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+defoma (0.11.10-3.1) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * Fix debhelper scripts to work when defoma is not installed.
+(Closes: #563121)
+
+ -- Keith Packard Wed, 30 Dec 2009 17:34:01 -0800
+
defoma (0.11.10-3) unstable; urgency=low
* QA upload to fix errors in previous QA upload
--
1.6.5.7
--
keith.pack...@intel.com
pgpxTfhD0bjkx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Bug#563121: dh_installdefoma leads to buggy maintainer scripts
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 09:03:59 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Keith Packard (30/12/2009): > > > I'm about to QA-upload defoma with this change in the various > > > debhelper-files/* files, but I wanted to open this bugreport for > > > reference. > > Fortunately, I didn't do so, that wouldn't have helped (yay for > sleeping before uploading :)). > > > Here's a patch which I've used to build new fontconfig packages > > which should survive the absence of defoma. > > I don't think it would help. > > > - test -x `which defoma-app` && defoma-app update #PACKAGE# > > + which defoma-app >/dev/null && defoma-app update #PACKAGE# > > $ which doesnotexist >/dev/null && echo be happy > $ echo $? > 1 > > So the maintainer script bits generated by dh_installdefoma would > still lead to non-0 exits. Check out the 'bash' manual -- set -e explicitly excludes precisely this case from causing early termination of the script: The shell does not exit if the command that fails is part of the command list immedi‐ ately following a while or until keyword, part of the test following the if or elif reserved words, part of any command executed in a && or ⎪⎪ list except the command fol‐ lowing the final && or ⎪⎪, any command in a pipeline but the last, or if the command's return value is being inverted with !. > Current/common practice within debhelper seems to be: > | if [ -x "`which foo 2>/dev/null`" ]; then… That also seems fine, if a bit longer. > I think I'm going to upload with such a change once I'm up (for real, > not vaguely opening eyes). cool! I'd prefer to build fontconfig with your desired change; the set +e change will hold until then. I'll change the one other case to match whatever you choose to use. -- keith.pack...@intel.com pgprfFohmahds.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#563121: dh_installdefoma leads to buggy maintainer scripts
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 18:44:18 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > In the meanwhile, defoma was uploaded with the debhelper-like syntax > (as quoted above). In my previous mail[1], you can scratch “until new > defoma is installed on all architectures” since it's arch: all. ;) Ok, I've adopted the same syntax in fontconfig 2.8.0-2 and uploaded that (after testing in a chroot). Please let me know asap if anything breaks with this version. -- keith.pack...@intel.com pgpGaC60XabMO.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#49258: Privacy Statement ad
English Cono Sur http://img444.imageshack.us/img444/4790/q7hw0.gif If liked what DTS could love -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#376159: Open21xx Bug Report
Good catch. Putting the EOF in the character buffer doesn't sound like a bright thing to do either. I'll review the whole section and get a release to you. Thanks for you help, Keith -Original Message- From: Matej Vela [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 4:37 AM To: Michel Dänzer Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Paul Wise; Keith Clifford; debian-powerpc; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#376159: Open21xx Bug Report Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 15:55 +, Paul Wise wrote: >> Looks like it never built/worked on those platforms: >> >> http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=&pkg=open21xx >> >> Hopefully someone on the porter lists will be able to help (CCed). >> >> If no-one replies, I'm willing to use the Debian development machines to >> help you fix this issue. I'm not familiar with the open21xx source or >> package, and I have little time for Debian stuff, so I'll need some >> direction and hints about this. > > Given the list of failing architectures, I think the most likely cause > is some code relying on char being signed by default. And indeed, > building the as21 directory with -fsigned-char makes it build for me. You're right, as21/cpp.c was comparing a plain char to EOF. I've uploaded the attached patch, let's see if it works. Thanks, Matej
Bug#376159: Open21xx Bug Report
Thanks for the insight. I'll compile it both ways, signed-char and unsigned-char to make sure everything works before I do a new release. Cheers, Keith -Original Message- From: Michel Dänzer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 3:41 AM To: Paul Wise Cc: Keith Clifford; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; debian-powerpc; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Open21xx Bug Report On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 15:55 +, Paul Wise wrote: > On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 08:19 -0700, Keith Clifford wrote: > > > This is the first time these problems have been brought to my attention. > > Unfortunately, I don't have access to the platforms that the build is > > failing on. So, unless someone is willing to step up and help me > > troubleshoot the problems on those platforms, there is little I can do. > > > > I guess you'll have to remove Open21xx from Debian. > > Looks like it never built/worked on those platforms: > > http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=&pkg=open21xx > > Hopefully someone on the porter lists will be able to help (CCed). > > If no-one replies, I'm willing to use the Debian development machines to > help you fix this issue. I'm not familiar with the open21xx source or > package, and I have little time for Debian stuff, so I'll need some > direction and hints about this. Given the list of failing architectures, I think the most likely cause is some code relying on char being signed by default. And indeed, building the as21 directory with -fsigned-char makes it build for me. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://tungstengraphics.com Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer
Bug#376159: Open21xx Bug Report
Hi all, I've made the necessary corrections to open21xx. I've built it with char signed and unsigned and that was the only instance of that particular problem. The new release, open21xx-0.7.6, is available on http://www3.telus.net/sharpshin/downloads/open21xx. Please let me know how it goes. Thanks for your help and regards, Keith Clifford. -Original Message- From: Paul Wise [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2007 8:56 AM To: Keith Clifford Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; debian-powerpc; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Open21xx Bug Report On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 08:19 -0700, Keith Clifford wrote: > This is the first time these problems have been brought to my attention. > Unfortunately, I don't have access to the platforms that the build is > failing on. So, unless someone is willing to step up and help me > troubleshoot the problems on those platforms, there is little I can do. > > I guess you'll have to remove Open21xx from Debian. Looks like it never built/worked on those platforms: http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=&pkg=open21xx Hopefully someone on the porter lists will be able to help (CCed). If no-one replies, I'm willing to use the Debian development machines to help you fix this issue. I'm not familiar with the open21xx source or package, and I have little time for Debian stuff, so I'll need some direction and hints about this. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#976586: Bug#976535: Bug#976495: also happens on amd64, should be worked around by 1.8.20-5 but the real fix will come with 1.8.20-6
Lucas Nussbaum writes:
> There was a texlive update in the meantime. Here are the versions of
> packages that differ.
I explored this a bit today -- there's something quite amiss with the
docbook toolchain. I'm seeing a lot of this error:
! Undefined control sequence.
\close@pdflink ->\Hy@endcolorlink
\Hy@VerboseLinkStop \pdfendlink
l.585 ...-mode}}History\endNode{}\endSeq{}\endLink
{}\Seq%
The result is that pdfjadetex exits with status 1 and the resulting PDF
has a lot of artifacts in the TOC. Each TOC label and page number are
prefixed with 'black'.
I'd be happy to help fix things, but I'm afraid I'm way out of my
docbook depth here.
--
-keith
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Bug#809480: Typo in CVS document for "suck" command.
Package: cvs Version: 1.12.13+real-12 The "info" documentation for the "cvs suck" command contains the following: Locates the file module/path,v or module/pa/Attic/th,v and downloads it raw as RCS comma-v file. The string "/Attic/" appears to have been inserted in the wrong place. The correct text is: Locates the file module/path,v or module/Attic/path,v and downloads it raw as RCS comma-v file. The "suck" command is apparently a Debian-specific addition to CVS; it does not appear in CVS 1.12.13. -- Keith Thompson
Bug#206264: bulkmail's licence
> I'm wondering if you'd consider dropping the clause against using > bulkmail for sending unsolicited commercial email. This would allow > bulkmail to be distributed as a part of Debian. sorry, no. I am sure you can understand why I believe it's more important to forbid use of my software for spamming, than to conform to some set of guidelines. Even though I accept that the guidelines are well-intentioned, I think they are overbroad. If there is another way of accomplishing the same thing within Debian's guidelines, I'd be willing to consider granting an alternate license to Debian. Keith
Bug#711813:
Newer scanners can utilize this paper length to detect double feeds. However some others (DM152) can get confused during media flush if it is set. --flip-page[=(auto|yes|no)] [inactive] Tells page-flipping document scanners to flip the paper back to its original orientation before dropping it in the output tray. Turning this off might make scanning a little faster if you don't care about manually flipping the pages afterwards. Type ``scanimage --help -d DEVICE'' to get list of all options for DEVICE. List of available devices: v4l:/dev/video0 avision:libusb:002:012 kbare@musicality:~$ dpkg -l sane-utils Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name Version Architecture Description +++-==---= ii sane-utils 1.0.23-3 amd64API library for scanners -- utili --Keith
