Bug#793314: Let's just drop handlersocket

2015-12-30 Thread Clint Byrum
It is an interesting piece of technology, but IMO it is more trouble
than it is worth, and most of the use cases for it are handled well by
the Memcache protocol addition in MySQL 5.6:

http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.6/en/innodb-memcached.html

I orphaned it a long time ago, and nobody has stepped up to maintain, so
I suggest just dropping it rather than chasing this RC.



Bug#793314: Let's just drop handlersocket

2016-01-01 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Esa Peuha's message of 2016-01-01 03:32:45 -0800:
> On Wed, 30 Dec 2015, Clint Byrum wrote:
> 
> > I orphaned it a long time ago, and nobody has stepped up to maintain, so
> > I suggest just dropping it rather than chasing this RC.
> 
> The people who have the power to completely remove packages from
> Debian are unlikely to notice this here, so please file a proper
> removal request, i.e. file a bug for the pseudo-package
> ftp.debian.org with subject "RM: handlersocket -- ROM;  reasons>" and details of the reasons in the body. (I would do so
> myself, but removal requests are expected to be filed by either
> maintainer(s) of a package or the QA team, and I'm neither.)

Nor am I the maintainer, as I orphaned the package, and the QA team has
taken ownership. I'm just recording my recommendation that it should be
removed.