Bug#142195: elm-me+: fastmail doesn't accept input from stdin anymore
Package: elm-me+ Version: 2.4pl25ME+95-2 Severity: important Sometime in the recent pst, fastmail stopped accepting input from stdin. Before, something like "echo test | fastmail -s test - [EMAIL PROTECTED]" used to work. With the current version, a mail with an empty body is delivered. -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux richard 2.4.13-ac5 #1 SMP Wed Oct 31 21:26:56 CET 2001 i686 Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB Versions of packages elm-me+ depends on: ii exim [mail-transport-age 3.35-1 An MTA (Mail Transport Agent) ii libc62.2.5-4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libncurses5 5.2.20020112a-7 Shared libraries for terminal hand -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Incomplete upload found in Debian upload queue
Hi Admin! You wrote: > Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in > the Debian upload queue directory: > fwanalog_0.6.3-1.dsc > fwanalog_0.6.3.orig.tar.gz > This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job > cannot be processed. > If no .changes file arrives within 10:58:25, the files will be deleted. Any idea what this is? It seems to be sent to -qa every ten minutes. -- Kind regards, +--------+ | Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7 | || Fingerprint: c1f5 f24c d514 3fec 8bf6 | | [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] | a2b1 2bae e41f 0644 fab7 | ++
Re: Incomplete upload found in Debian upload queue
Hi James! You wrote: > I've moved the broken upload out of the way. Thanks! -- Kind regards, +----+ | Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7 | || Fingerprint: c1f5 f24c d514 3fec 8bf6 | | [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] | a2b1 2bae e41f 0644 fab7 | ++
Bug#456336: metamail: -h option fails
Package: metamail Version: 2.7-53 Severity: important This seems a separate issue than #237826, although it might be related in some way. When I try to run metamail -g on a test file, I get: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/tmp> metamail -h test sh: /tmp/MvjmV2p: Permission denied Command failed: /tmp/MvjmV2p Strangely enough, the version I build locally for debugging works perfectly. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.23.8 (SMP w/1 CPU core; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages metamail depends on: ii libc6 2.7-4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libncurses5 5.6+20071124-1 Shared libraries for terminal hand Versions of packages metamail recommends: ii mime-support 3.39-1 MIME files 'mime.types' & 'mailcap ii sharutils 1:4.6.3-1 shar, unshar, uuencode, uudecode -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#347160: libubit-dev: uninstallable; depends on removed xlibs-dev
Hi! Please don't bother fixing this bug: the ubit package will be removed from the archive (see #344597). -- Kind regards, +----+ | Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7 | || Fingerprint: c1f5 f24c d514 3fec 8bf6 | | [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] | a2b1 2bae e41f 0644 fab7 | ++ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330084: xawtv-plugin-qt: segfaults on start recording
severity 330084 important thanks As this bug hasn't been confirmed by anyone but the original submitten, who doesn't have to correct hardware anymore to debug it, I'm downgradring this bug. -- Kind regards, +--------+ | Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7 | || Fingerprint: c1f5 f24c d514 3fec 8bf6 | | [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] | a2b1 2bae e41f 0644 fab7 | ++ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#390287: xawtv: Don't show any tv
# not sure why this was here
tag 390287 - patch
thanks
pushling provided me with another strace, of the case where xawtv was
functioning (with the symlink in place, as described above); the strace
is attached.
When comparing it to the strace of the failing xawtv, it turns out that
in the strace for the _working_ process, /dev/dri/card0 can't be
openened correctly (probably because it is not a proper dri device).
Because of this, libGL falls back to some other, slower rendering of the
tv image:
| stat64("/dev/dri/card0", {st_mode=S_IFCHR|0660, st_rdev=makedev(81, 0), ...})
= 0
| open("/dev/dri/card0", O_RDWR)= 4
| ioctl(4, DECODER_SET_PICTURE, 0xbfeaca50) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument)
| ioctl(4, DECODER_GET_CAPABILITIES, 0xbfeaca54) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument)
| close(4) = 0
...
| write(2, "libGL error: open DRM failed (Op"..., 55) = 55
| write(2, "libGL error: reverting to (slow)"..., 52) = 52
The strace of the non-fucntioning xawtv, otoh, shows that /dev/dri/card0
is opened correctly, and linGL tries to use it to show the video. In
the end of the strace, it seems some ioctl on that device fails:
| ioctl(4, 0x4008642a, 0xbff16824)= ? ERESTARTSYS (To be restarted)
So, I'm guessing that this is either a bug in the reporter's GL/dri
setup, or a bug in OpenGL.
--
+--------+
| Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7 |
|| Fingerprint: c1f5 f24c d514 3fec 8bf6 |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] | a2b1 2bae e41f 0644 fab7 |
++
xawtv.working.strace.gz
Description: Binary data
Re: cooperation with Linux+DVD magazine - urgent!!!
Dear Magdalena, Thank you for your interest in Debian. Unfortunately, the address you sent your inquiry to is used to discuss internal technical matters, and we can't help you with your story. Therefore, I'm forwarding this message now to our press contact address, [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm sure they can supply you with any copy you need. Please also contact them for any other questions you might have about Debian. Thansk again for your interest! Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw You wrote: > Hi, > my name is Magda and I represent Linux+DVD magazine (for more details please, > see below). > We would like to help Linux community to get to know about themselves all > over the world. Thus, we will be happy to submit news about your latest > projects, progress, events, plans, problems etc. in our magazine. > Could you provide us with some information about your progress? Please! We > need a 2300 characters text and a screen shot. If you could send us something > like this it would be marvelous! > The deadline is yeasterday really ;-( > I will be more than grateful for your help and I am looking forward to > hearing from you. > Best regards, > > About Linux+DVD: > It is a quarterly magazine dedicated to all Linux distribution; step-by-step > guide; covering practical details of how to install, configure, protect > against intruder (security aspects of this distribution) as well as many > additional details; gathering authors who are specialists in this field. > Linux+DVD directed to all of those who are interested in Linux distribution – > both professionals and hobbyists. > Our magazine is published in 5 language versions in about 10 countries! > We have great readership in Europe and in January we are going to hit the USA > (available in Barnes&Noble), later - Australia, Holland and UK. > -- > Magda Blaszczyk > hakin9, Linux+DVD Junior Product Manager > www.en.hakin9.org > www.lpmagazine.org/en > +4 8 22 887 14 57 > > Software Media LLC > 1461 A First Avenue, # 360 > New York, NY 10021-2209 > USA > -- Kind regards, ++ | Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7 | || Fingerprint: c1f5 f24c d514 3fec 8bf6 | | [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] | a2b1 2bae e41f 0644 fab7 | ++
Bug#889803: NMU for cdio-paranoia
Hi Pavel, Did you NMU for cd-paranoia ever made it though DELAYED? I was also looking for the cd-paranoia binary, but it still doesn't seem to be in the archive. Gr, Bas. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Ssh2-packet still secure?
[ccing to debian-devel]
Hi Johan!
You wrote:
> I use ssh2 (2.0.13-7) on my webserver. As far as I can see this packet has
> not been updated since Sat, 15 Dec 2001 12:43:25 +. My question is if
> this packet is still considered secure and reliable to use after all
> OpenSSH-bugs, since it's not updated for almost 2 years, or is that because
> it's considered outdated?
AFAIK, the ssh2 package was removed ages ago because of it having
security bugs and it being obsoleted by openssh. As far as I can see,
it's not even present in woody any more. Are you still running potato
or is perhaps the upgrade path broken?
Anyway, you should really upgrade to openssh ("ssh" package in Debian);
I guess your current package is very much not patched to security
trouble.
--
Kind regards,
+--------+
| Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7 |
|| Fingerprint: c1f5 f24c d514 3fec 8bf6 |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] | a2b1 2bae e41f 0644 fab7 |
++
pgpjFS0hNwkYE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
