Processed: block 1084310 with 1091032
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 1084310 with 1091032 Bug #1084310 [src:node-yarnpkg] node-yarnpkg: FTBFS: packages/yarnpkg-libzip/artifacts/zlib-ng-2.1.2/deflate.h:212:34: error: expected parameter declarator 1084310 was not blocked by any bugs. 1084310 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 1084310: 1091032 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1084310: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1084310 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: affects 1091032
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 1091032 src:node-yarnpkg Bug #1091032 [emscripten] node-inwasm: FTBFS: wasm-ld-18: error: unknown argument: --no-growable-memory Added indication that 1091032 affects src:node-yarnpkg > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1091032: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1091032 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1091032: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Reassign to emscripten
Le jeu. 23 janv. 2025 à 10:51, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Quoting Paul Gevers (2025-01-23 09:29:22) > > Hi javascript maintainers, > > > > On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 14:41:12 +0100 Jonas Smedegaard > wrote: > > > > Alternatively I'd look into removing it from testing, however > there's a few > > > > rdeps that look hard to remove. > > > > > > Which "it" are you talking about removing from testing? > > > > emscript, and as a consequence all its reverse (build) dependencies. The > > bad shape of emscript is the last piece blocking the removal of > > llvm-toolchain-15 which we don't want to ship in trixie. > > Ok. > > Just a nitpick: The name is "emscripten" - the trailing "en" is part of > the name. > > It seems that among the reverse build-dependencies is node-corepack, > which in turn has quite a few build-dependencies. Let's hope most of > those rely on non-WASM parts of that package and can survive the blow. > I removed the extra arbitrary build-dependencies from node-corepack (cmake, rsync, emscripten).
gnunet is marked for autoremoval from testing
gnunet 0.20.0-6 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2025-03-09 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 1094039: python-dom-toml: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:9: override_dh_auto_test] Error 1 https://bugs.debian.org/1094039 For more information on the autoremoval process, including hints to prevent autoremoval can be found on the wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/Autoremoval This mail is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl Autoremoval data is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl
mkdocs-material is marked for autoremoval from testing
mkdocs-material 9.5.50-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2025-03-09 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 1094039: python-dom-toml: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:9: override_dh_auto_test] Error 1 https://bugs.debian.org/1094039 For more information on the autoremoval process, including hints to prevent autoremoval can be found on the wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/Autoremoval This mail is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl Autoremoval data is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl
gnunet-fuse is marked for autoremoval from testing
gnunet-fuse 0.20.0-4 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2025-03-09 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 1094039: python-dom-toml: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:9: override_dh_auto_test] Error 1 https://bugs.debian.org/1094039 For more information on the autoremoval process, including hints to prevent autoremoval can be found on the wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/Autoremoval This mail is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl Autoremoval data is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl
pylint-django is marked for autoremoval from testing
pylint-django 2.0.13-4 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2025-03-09 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 1094039: python-dom-toml: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:9: override_dh_auto_test] Error 1 https://bugs.debian.org/1094039 For more information on the autoremoval process, including hints to prevent autoremoval can be found on the wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/Autoremoval This mail is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl Autoremoval data is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl
gnunet-gtk is marked for autoremoval from testing
gnunet-gtk 0.20.0-4 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2025-03-09 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 1094039: python-dom-toml: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:9: override_dh_auto_test] Error 1 https://bugs.debian.org/1094039 For more information on the autoremoval process, including hints to prevent autoremoval can be found on the wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/Autoremoval This mail is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl Autoremoval data is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl
tupi is marked for autoremoval from testing
tupi 0.2+git08-5 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2025-02-22 It is affected by these RC bugs: 1094073: tupi: FTBFS: make[2]: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop. https://bugs.debian.org/1094073 For more information on the autoremoval process, including hints to prevent autoremoval can be found on the wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/Autoremoval This mail is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl Autoremoval data is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl
alien is marked for autoremoval from testing
alien 8.95.8 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2025-03-09 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 1094039: python-dom-toml: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:9: override_dh_auto_test] Error 1 https://bugs.debian.org/1094039 For more information on the autoremoval process, including hints to prevent autoremoval can be found on the wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/Autoremoval This mail is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl Autoremoval data is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl
doodle is marked for autoremoval from testing
doodle 0.7.3-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2025-03-09 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 1094039: python-dom-toml: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:9: override_dh_auto_test] Error 1 https://bugs.debian.org/1094039 For more information on the autoremoval process, including hints to prevent autoremoval can be found on the wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/Autoremoval This mail is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl Autoremoval data is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl
django-organizations is marked for autoremoval from testing
django-organizations 2.3.1-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2025-03-09 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 1094039: python-dom-toml: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:9: override_dh_auto_test] Error 1 https://bugs.debian.org/1094039 For more information on the autoremoval process, including hints to prevent autoremoval can be found on the wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/Autoremoval This mail is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl Autoremoval data is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl
fwlogwatch is marked for autoremoval from testing
fwlogwatch 1.4-5 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2025-03-09 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 1094069: rsyslog: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: make -j8 check "TESTSUITEFLAGS=-j8 --verbose" VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2 https://bugs.debian.org/1094069 For more information on the autoremoval process, including hints to prevent autoremoval can be found on the wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/Autoremoval This mail is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl Autoremoval data is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl
epm is marked for autoremoval from testing
epm 4.2-12 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2025-03-09 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 1094039: python-dom-toml: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:9: override_dh_auto_test] Error 1 https://bugs.debian.org/1094039 For more information on the autoremoval process, including hints to prevent autoremoval can be found on the wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/Autoremoval This mail is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl Autoremoval data is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl
sqlitecpp_3.3.2-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2025 17:13:08 -0500 Source: sqlitecpp Architecture: source Version: 3.3.2-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: Boyuan Yang Changes: sqlitecpp (3.3.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * QA upload. * New upstream release. * debian/control: Bump Standards-Version to 4.7.0. Checksums-Sha1: 29926af570d8648b185bb5ffed2e8f597a580733 1958 sqlitecpp_3.3.2-1.dsc 5b7b643b88bb4bea489d2f24c8a59e455545fa77 2691628 sqlitecpp_3.3.2.orig.tar.gz c9bab310b5ef85a86a62069e23dd1a06ea24d362 3532 sqlitecpp_3.3.2-1.debian.tar.xz d9ea8d523e46002e9e255f1f20929ce84fc6a90c 7404 sqlitecpp_3.3.2-1_amd64.buildinfo Checksums-Sha256: bf00e4b13828e2d5dbc637aba870f769272562d35df3581cfec95b5038f53b3a 1958 sqlitecpp_3.3.2-1.dsc 5aa8eda130d0689bd5ed9b2074714c2dbc610f710483c61ba6cf944cebfe03af 2691628 sqlitecpp_3.3.2.orig.tar.gz 1b107de0621e155fda808124a06aa6ed425213663c1f67a0a4cdc8ed32970a4b 3532 sqlitecpp_3.3.2-1.debian.tar.xz 6fad4e827d282c30f8078c069755bed4feedebbbda6f5a23aeccca20179ba6e6 7404 sqlitecpp_3.3.2-1_amd64.buildinfo Files: 95811b60e4e15bbc89ed27d68b768084 1958 libs optional sqlitecpp_3.3.2-1.dsc 7a95e49e61034fa305e272071377bee8 2691628 libs optional sqlitecpp_3.3.2.orig.tar.gz 87340db22b9cadbaf44a04a518009fcc 3532 libs optional sqlitecpp_3.3.2-1.debian.tar.xz b3dbe9a1bdb00f485623e3835c5242dc 7404 libs optional sqlitecpp_3.3.2-1_amd64.buildinfo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEfncpR22H1vEdkazLwpPntGGCWs4FAmeenP8ACgkQwpPntGGC Ws5sfQ/9GGdsf8+/LNcG8JKcSmHTd9HiNX0FtxlL0EDHiFG2VRgyOM+2SaM5INM+ qHaYrEK8KbwO5rYSVWevm30XCshvApzFKoZ8GmFbXgZ8a7Jn9/7yULA61/ROpt3q FK/pVak5gFyDIzWb/wQkBoLWOg6NicoyPCyd5B5nHbY8yNCeBunxF9TB2KiRf+uS wv8W7zL+Ul5mRs3uEkeu2Hb2UW0v9u0IdOAtn7wyrYbqX2A0AQougXI+GinqkMuD SmHiSVh7X7TCojkBeu2N7xEuOnRN/1QEUYWx1ldjbM1lN8ZiN7iLUrRjZxzK1eNK NILsoq2xFmecMEbWmE+XgFPko/3BBrmglWnZE+BYL2hDSttp7NsHTVy1AAmT0MBc kIDM+SAkwkPK38AVqtnT5s3VjLVbSEKSAOlTtdXgbfhdZJVve07rhtzUEFRAYipq YIWtpxjdx3AECXXxYVSAwP/2qJnqh5TMrSytUgAwC5gz8YR/lhY3qUXXEEKgHBt2 vFenLpbro3e3Q8wW9AiKDncqt+vDyWcB33F+GZwlxfbmC6rdCWtmLcV4SiZ4JiHY ACExQ1YVqm+yVAGdnVzkKRCRzm59+YhexQNkCo/33VkXWyGsJRSsjc7NBxbWwB/B gGW7R7wwyL7O0AF5xA62nkTQC68m50hNAOOHvzJM7ccCZPI80BA= =3q+o -END PGP SIGNATURE- pgpvmqVpmVyLG.pgp Description: PGP signature
Processing of sqlitecpp_3.3.2-1_source.changes
sqlitecpp_3.3.2-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: sqlitecpp_3.3.2-1.dsc sqlitecpp_3.3.2.orig.tar.gz sqlitecpp_3.3.2-1.debian.tar.xz sqlitecpp_3.3.2-1_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Bug#1094954: RM: nixnote2 -- RoQA; Orphaned; Depends on obsolete QtWebkit
Package: ftp.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:nixnote2 X-Debbugs-Cc: nixno...@packages.debian.org User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: remove Severity: normal Dear Debian FTP Masters, Please remove package nixnote2 ( https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/nixnote2 ) from Debian Sid. It has been orphaned for a year, depends on the obsolete QtWebkit that is scheduled for removal [1], and has a basically inactive upstream that has no plan of migrating away from QtWebkit. Thanks, Boyuan Yang [1] https://bugs.debian.org/1069574 OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1093612: marked as done (FTBFS and autopkgtests fail on armhf and riscv64: assert not _q._sync_mutex.locked())
Your message dated Sat, 01 Feb 2025 18:36:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1094021: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1093612, regarding FTBFS and autopkgtests fail on armhf and riscv64: assert not _q._sync_mutex.locked() to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1093612: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1093612 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: python-janus Version: 1.0.0-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/python-janus/testing/armhf/56725940/ https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/python-janus/testing/riscv64/56719506/ I also tried to rebuild the package in a local armhf chroot and it failed the same two tests at the build time. -- System Information: Debian Release: trixie/sid APT prefers unstable-debug APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'testing-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (101, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 6.12.8-amd64 (SMP w/16 CPU threads; PREEMPT) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Locale: LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 1.0.0-3+rm Dear submitter, as the package python-janus has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1094021 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/. Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Paul Tagliamonte (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
Bug#922467: marked as done (Noise from wkhtmltopdf ends up in the process' stdout/stderr)
Your message dated Sat, 01 Feb 2025 18:40:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1094345: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #922467,
regarding Noise from wkhtmltopdf ends up in the process' stdout/stderr
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
922467: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=922467
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: python3-pdfkit
Version: 0.6.1-1
Severity: normal
Hello,
thanks for packaging pdfkit.
In the current buster, using pdfkit results in noise to the program's
output streams:
$ cat /tmp/foo.py
import pdfkit
pdfkit.from_string("foo", "/tmp/test.pdf")
$ python3 /tmp/foo.py
libpng warning: iCCP: known incorrect sRGB profile
libpng warning: iCCP: known incorrect sRGB profile
Loading page (1/2)
Printing pages (2/2)
Done
This is unfortunately almost a showstopper for using pdfkit on command
line tools.
Enrico
-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_WARN, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_IE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_IE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8),
LANGUAGE=en_IE:en (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages python3-pdfkit depends on:
ii python3 3.7.2-1
ii wkhtmltopdf 0.12.4-1
python3-pdfkit recommends no packages.
python3-pdfkit suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.0.0-5+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package pdfkit has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1094345
The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/.
Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.
This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Paul Tagliamonte (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
Bug#1084425: marked as done (obexfs: move from fuse to fuse3)
Your message dated Sat, 01 Feb 2025 18:46:22 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1094468: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1084425, regarding obexfs: move from fuse to fuse3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1084425: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1084425 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: obexfs Version: 0.11-3 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, your package currently (Build-)Depends on fuse - that is fuse 2.x, it being obsolete. A newer version of fuse, fuse3, is available since at least buster. Please migrate your package to the fuse3 library, which is actively maintained. It would be great if we could remove fuse 2.x in the forky development cycle. If you cannot migrate yet, please at least update your Depends: line. If you currently have: > Depends: fuse please update that to: > Depends: fuse3 (>= 3.10.1-3) | fuse (<< 3) This allows mount.fuse and fusermount to be provided by fuse3, which is what the majority of new installs already have [1]. You should still migrate from libfuse 2.x to libfuse 3.x later. fuse upstream noted important differences in [2]. [1] compare https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=fuse and https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=fuse3 [2] https://github.com/libfuse/libfuse/releases/tag/fuse-3.0.0 --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.11-3+rm Dear submitter, as the package obexfs has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1094468 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/. Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Paul Tagliamonte (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
Bug#461509: marked as done (Not possible to specify options in fstab)
Your message dated Sat, 01 Feb 2025 18:46:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1094468: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #461509,
regarding Not possible to specify options in fstab
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
461509: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=461509
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: obexfs
Version: 0.10-3+b2
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
first I have to say that I have no clue where the bug actually is. But
when I follow obexfs documentation how to specify mount point in fstab,
it does not work. Simply "obexfs#-b00:11:22:33:44:55\040-B10" is not
passed properly through all chain and obexfs gets signle parameter
containing both options and it does not parse channel out of it.
Strace log of mount:
# strace -s 100 -e execve -f mount /media/nokia/
execve("/bin/mount", ["mount", "/media/nokia/"], [/* 46 vars */]) = 0
[pid 19030] execve("/sbin/mount.fuse", ["/sbin/mount.fuse",
"obexfs#-b00:11:22:33:44:55 -B10", "/media/nokia", "-o",
"rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev,noauto,user"], [/* 42 vars */]) = 0
[pid 19030] execve("/bin/sh", ["/bin/sh", "-c", "\'obexfs\'
\'-b00:11:22:33:44:55 -B10\' \'/media/nokia\' \'-o\'
\'rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev\'"], [/* 43 vars */]) = 0
[pid 19031] execve("/usr/bin/obexfs", ["obexfs", "-b00:11:22:33:44:55 -B10",
"/media/nokia", "-o", "rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev"], [/* 43 vars */]) = 0
The problem is obviously in passing both parameters in single string,
because when I call obexfs manually, it works:
obexfs -b00:11:22:33:44:55 -B10 /media/nokia/
I'm not sure who should be responsible for splitting it up or whether
obexfs should parse these options and does not, so please feel free to
reassign this issue to appropriate package.
- --
Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.23-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=cs_CZ.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=cs_CZ.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages obexfs depends on:
ii fuse-utils2.7.2-1Filesystem in USErspace (utilities
ii libbluetooth2 3.24-1 Library to use the BlueZ Linux Blu
ii libc6 2.7-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libfuse2 2.7.2-1Filesystem in USErspace library
ii libopenobex1 1.3-3 OBEX protocol library
obexfs recommends no packages.
- -- no debconf information
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHkXW13DVS6DbnVgQRAntYAKC9ko3hefUqBuua0JdSP7IqMLgJNgCeIkVS
jAbDTT1sEbVHxWBI1H4ntX8=
=A22D
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.11-3+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package obexfs has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1094468
The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/.
Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.
This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Paul Tagliamonte (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
Bug#582854: marked as done (obexfs: copied files are corrupted)
Your message dated Sat, 01 Feb 2025 18:46:22 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1094468: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #582854, regarding obexfs: copied files are corrupted to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 582854: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=582854 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: obexfs Version: 0.11-1 Severity: normal Trying copy photo from my phone with FUSE obexfs: Bus 003 Device 003: ID 2001:f111 D-Link Corp. [hex] DBT-122 Bluetooth adapter Linux home 2.6.32-3-amd64 #1 SMP Wed Feb 24 18:07:42 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux obexfs -b XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX /media/k750i/ cp /media/k750i/Memory\ Stick/DCIM/100MSDCF/* . ls -la /media/k750i/Memory\ Stick/DCIM/100MSDCF/DSC0102?.JPG -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 88859 Авг 31 1948267 /media/k750i/Memory Stick/DCIM/100MSDCF/DSC01020.JPG -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 98821 Июл 31 1948267 /media/k750i/Memory Stick/DCIM/100MSDCF/DSC01021.JPG -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 42900 Июн 30 1948267 /media/k750i/Memory Stick/DCIM/100MSDCF/DSC01022.JPG -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 78115 Май 31 1948267 /media/k750i/Memory Stick/DCIM/100MSDCF/DSC01023.JPG -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 94686 Апр 30 1948267 /media/k750i/Memory Stick/DCIM/100MSDCF/DSC01024.JPG -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 97512 Мар 31 1948267 /media/k750i/Memory Stick/DCIM/100MSDCF/DSC01025.JPG -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 106394 Фев 28 1948267 /media/k750i/Memory Stick/DCIM/100MSDCF/DSC01026.JPG -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 109294 Янв 31 1948267 /media/k750i/Memory Stick/DCIM/100MSDCF/DSC01027.JPG -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 108162 Дек 31 1948266 /media/k750i/Memory Stick/DCIM/100MSDCF/DSC01028.JPG -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 112662 Ноя 30 1948266 /media/k750i/Memory Stick/DCIM/100MSDCF/DSC01029.JPG ls -la DSC0102?.JPG -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 79866 Май 22 20:59 DSC01020.JPG -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 79866 Май 22 20:59 DSC01021.JPG -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 42900 Май 22 20:59 DSC01022.JPG -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 78115 Май 22 20:59 DSC01023.JPG -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 79866 Май 22 20:59 DSC01024.JPG -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 79866 Май 22 20:59 DSC01025.JPG -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 79866 Май 22 20:59 DSC01026.JPG -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 79866 Май 22 20:59 DSC01027.JPG -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 79866 Май 22 20:59 DSC01028.JPG -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 79866 Май 22 20:59 DSC01029.JPG as you can see, copied files are broken, they are less than the originals, cp does not report any error, but in dmesg i see this: [ 4909.116984] hci_cmd_task: hci0 command tx timeout [ 7680.732055] INFO: task ls:6079 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [ 7680.732058] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [ 7680.732059] lsD 0 6079 6017 0x0004 [ 7680.732062] 88013fa7b880 0082 8104a196 [ 7680.732065] 0092 f8a0 8800b24b5fd8 [ 7680.732067] 000155c0 000155c0 880118625bd0 880118625ec8 [ 7680.732069] Call Trace: [ 7680.732075] [] ? try_to_wake_up+0x249/0x259 [ 7680.732078] [] ? __wake_up+0x30/0x44 [ 7680.732088] [] ? fuse_request_send+0x196/0x249 [fuse] [ 7680.732090] [] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2e [ 7680.732094] [] ? fuse_dentry_revalidate+0x147/0x21d [fuse] [ 7680.732098] [] ? do_revalidate+0x12/0x45 [ 7680.732099] [] ? do_lookup+0x133/0x15d [ 7680.732101] [] ? __link_path_walk+0x323/0x6d4 [ 7680.732103] [] ? path_walk+0x66/0xc9 [ 7680.732105] [] ? do_path_lookup+0x20/0x77 [ 7680.732107] [] ? user_path_at+0x48/0x79 [ 7680.732110] [] ? handle_mm_fault+0x351/0x7a5 [ 7680.732112] [] ? get_unmapped_area+0xd7/0x139 [ 7680.732114] [] ? vfs_fstatat+0x2c/0x57 [ 7680.732116] [] ? sys_newlstat+0x11/0x30 [ 7680.732119] [] ? do_page_fault+0x266/0x282 [ 7680.732122] [] ? __up_read+0x13/0x8e [ 7680.732125] [] ? page_fault+0x25/0x30 [ 7680.732128] [] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b i try cp two times, it always copy broken files. also at first time i issue 'ls -l /media/k750i/Memory\ Stick/DCIM/100MSDCF' in other console - it hangs, then i wait cp completion and umount/mount obexfs and try second time. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (800, 'testing'), (800, 'stable'), (200, 'unstable'), (65, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages obexfs
Bug#509846: marked as done (Synopsis of obexfs(1) is missing mount point and options)
Your message dated Sat, 01 Feb 2025 18:46:22 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1094468: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #509846, regarding Synopsis of obexfs(1) is missing mount point and options to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 509846: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=509846 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: obexfs Severity: minor The synopsis doesn't show mount point and options. Adding something like: [ -- mount_options ] mount_point to the end of the synopsis should be sufficient. An example lower down the page would also be nice. One thing would be nice to clear up, too: obexftp seems to take bluetooth device names or MAC addresses, but I can only make obexfs work with MAC addresses. If this is correct, it would be nice if -b documented it; otherwise, it's a bug. -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages obexfs depends on: ii fuse-utils2.7.4-1.1 Filesystem in USErspace (utilities pn libbluetooth2 (no description available) ii libc6 2.7-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libfuse2 2.7.4-1.1 Filesystem in USErspace library pn libopenobex1 (no description available) obexfs recommends no packages. obexfs suggests no packages. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.11-3+rm Dear submitter, as the package obexfs has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1094468 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/. Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Paul Tagliamonte (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
Bug#490011: marked as done (obexfs mounted phone has switched day and month)
Your message dated Sat, 01 Feb 2025 18:46:22 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1094468: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #490011, regarding obexfs mounted phone has switched day and month to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 490011: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=490011 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: obexfs Version: 0.10-3+b1 Severity: normal I mounted my phone (Nokia 6300) with obexfs and copied photos but they have switched day and month (2008-08-07 yesterday and 2008-09-07 today). -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-rc7-hrt1 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages obexfs depends on: ii fuse-utils 2.6.5-1 Filesystem in USErspace (utilities ii libbluetooth2 3.7-1 Library to use the BlueZ Linux Blu ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-13etch2 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libfuse2 2.6.5-1 Filesystem in USErspace library ii libopenobex1 1.3-3 OBEX protocol library obexfs recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.11-3+rm Dear submitter, as the package obexfs has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1094468 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/. Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Paul Tagliamonte (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
Bug#1094021: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: python-janus |1.0.0-3 | source python3-janus |1.0.0-3 | all --- Reason --- RoQA; RC-buggy; orphaned; leaf library -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 1094...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/1094021 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Paul Tagliamonte (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
Bug#1094345: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: pdfkit |1.0.0-5 | source python3-pdfkit |1.0.0-5 | all --- Reason --- RoQA; orphaned; leaf package; deprecated upstream -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 1094...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/1094345 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Paul Tagliamonte (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
Bug#1094381: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 1.5.0+git20241211-1+rm Dear submitter, as the package goldendict has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1094381 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/. Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Paul Tagliamonte (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
Bug#1094468: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 0.11-3+rm Dear submitter, as the package obexfs has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1094468 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/. Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Paul Tagliamonte (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
Bug#1094468: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: obexfs | 0.11-3 | source, amd64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x obexfs | 0.11-3+b1 | arm64 --- Reason --- RoQA; unmaintained, previous attempt to takeover from obexftp, uses obsolete libfuse 2.x -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 1094...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/1094468 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Paul Tagliamonte (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
Bug#1094345: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 1.0.0-5+rm Dear submitter, as the package pdfkit has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1094345 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/. Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Paul Tagliamonte (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
Bug#1094381: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: goldendict | 1.5.0+git20241211-1 | source --- Reason --- RoQA; superseded by goldendict-ng -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 1094...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/1094381 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Paul Tagliamonte (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
Bug#1094965: wtmpdb: provides no way to prune rotated logs
Package: wtmpdb Version: 0.13.0-5 Severity: normal wtmpdb will rotate logs but nothing will prune them (like logrotate would for other types of log - unfortunately it doesn't fit in well with the wtmpdb way). Also logs shouldn't be in a state directory like /var/lib. We can forgive the live database being there, perhaps. One solution I have in mind is: - add 'wtmpdb rotate --dest DIR' option - change timer/cron files to dump rotated files in /var/log - after rotation, prune files keeping a minimum age and count - configuration is by editing the unit/cron files I think we can set some long defaults - we just don't want unbounded accumulation!
Bug#1094021: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 1.0.0-3+rm Dear submitter, as the package python-janus has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1094021 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/. Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Paul Tagliamonte (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
python-sparkpost_1.3.10-5_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2025 10:20:53 +0100 Source: python-sparkpost Architecture: source Version: 1.3.10-5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: Alexandre Detiste Changes: python-sparkpost (1.3.10-5) unstable; urgency=medium . * QA Upload * Patch-ou usage of "six" * Enable tests Checksums-Sha1: 70107522ce1d8842f308beab656d4490189be193 2189 python-sparkpost_1.3.10-5.dsc 46cf21434e66846efdd924e98ecd1642e622d846 3868 python-sparkpost_1.3.10-5.debian.tar.xz 60c8343b8fd8b84273f67147877947fa1f4e4db0 8073 python-sparkpost_1.3.10-5_source.buildinfo Checksums-Sha256: 45cc47e0ef1478831c1c9d2407cc37dcaae159624132ce5ecf5266b6293ceac1 2189 python-sparkpost_1.3.10-5.dsc 5d0969dc64ab71c7f8207b35cbae84d019c23a1e8aa67be36615625c58cfa677 3868 python-sparkpost_1.3.10-5.debian.tar.xz 5cc4a87b31141017d2965bc2236311b008ad8e0eb8628e0263de97805d4d2ed1 8073 python-sparkpost_1.3.10-5_source.buildinfo Files: 98d1e03aef9b351fd5b155ba37d9b684 2189 python optional python-sparkpost_1.3.10-5.dsc 79ae477817fe6d4b13d08d1b56da0d3f 3868 python optional python-sparkpost_1.3.10-5.debian.tar.xz 3c3f16a3ce18254caae8b2b99c13813f 8073 python optional python-sparkpost_1.3.10-5_source.buildinfo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQJFBAEBCgAvFiEEj23hBDd/OxHnQXSHMfMURUShdBoFAmed7y8RHHRjaGV0QGRl Ymlhbi5vcmcACgkQMfMURUShdBo8khAAnSxgevkKz8EFzLIGgb/QS2rQGz0dLENL VUPUDFFBfLVAX3J91HM85sn7Ovt+6SUC7E2gckL6wPUaZ7mzs80Q6Kwk0kDM2sH0 SXTYA5NhPsDOcx2he8pjdsAORlHw2Q53OiWptsIQ9L62Et7Xt33gFMaIE7OF0/co NEzlCDzZYno4ylpfntkth5z8Ds48oRM2T9OMIbErdQWxU3URf7v3UN+b7Dz8UAbr XUu9R4PV5hqcdxg06uKxvziru4j7NwXPfqJeiHqGwhxiN9rMLcehUBuAUWBBc11L O4D2rr7rxNDxIZSxOM3mXSKPmCzEBcvNH02kEUMUJo57KK91/znM/u2g6UfORE15 LqLoX5wyJsf5P7RHZO6oahBilrABsrL0kpLZRYEKCu7cAhLJBPCPUv1Z71Ur9IDI WfhokxLpJiq2BCXNNH43rakkaJzXbI68+f9uBy2O3srAc2gbiqOiytucezlIff7G lcrI5jwhlkwfnmu72sKkmLc6PMwjT2dgz4pi3REHEytd+imrBsnzjLFT/EfPqxr+ u9aIe1A1LBA0pyQhjkGUkNOFHtjkoxn/wgXav4FbTg1NAtLCFUqgDPqrcRq00YI+ nIscb0BH0McYeqQSIsUwmMjYURgKqItENzhBlHRiGuoVD2g9hBuN+/QbFcxaihw/ iZRS4IGmLAg= =ATXt -END PGP SIGNATURE- pgpcHFAAkff9p.pgp Description: PGP signature
Processing of python-sparkpost_1.3.10-5_source.changes
python-sparkpost_1.3.10-5_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: python-sparkpost_1.3.10-5.dsc python-sparkpost_1.3.10-5.debian.tar.xz python-sparkpost_1.3.10-5_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
