hunt_1.5-9_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.



Accepted:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 10:42:48 +0200
Source: hunt
Architecture: source
Version: 1.5-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group 
Changed-By: Andreas Beckmann 
Closes: 1066712
Changes:
 hunt (1.5-9) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Fix building with -Werror=implicit-function-declaration.
 (Closes: #1066712)
Checksums-Sha1:
 fdb937d74fef9fcf305de1d13ae9b30374f7c863 1817 hunt_1.5-9.dsc
 8665595ca501c7bae4f1de00e616cc8466aa60cc 19468 hunt_1.5-9.debian.tar.xz
 2df3a19606bef61daeb126e6315a2d26fa959862 5599 hunt_1.5-9_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 456a1dd77a74ce94c767b85d1c8e6565daa64dcb515afbef74c4b87aa51ba4f1 1817 
hunt_1.5-9.dsc
 f1b3060da55d908b35ace37f7367ed0af0087a5ff4c5f4e7944d16d2d9c92128 19468 
hunt_1.5-9.debian.tar.xz
 2acde3accb3844deae5ee029b77879a3fdedf1851d0c8d25005e180292f645ca 5599 
hunt_1.5-9_source.buildinfo
Files:
 0f95a19813945f6b137eaa47e754ae5e 1817 net optional hunt_1.5-9.dsc
 b432ca4daa62e8fd82f06a9f7679d23c 19468 net optional hunt_1.5-9.debian.tar.xz
 1363019053fe9b91e49110833669f163 5599 net optional hunt_1.5-9_source.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=rrl4
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



pgptdPSmb8t6n.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Processing of hunt_1.5-9_source.changes

[Debian FTP Masters]

hunt_1.5-9_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  hunt_1.5-9.dsc
  hunt_1.5-9.debian.tar.xz
  hunt_1.5-9_source.buildinfo

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Bug#1066712: marked as done (hunt: FTBFS: timer.c:154:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘exit’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2024 09:04:34 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#1066712: fixed in hunt 1.5-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #1066712,
regarding hunt: FTBFS: timer.c:154:17: error: implicit declaration of function 
‘exit’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1066712: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066712
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: hunt
Version: 1.5-8
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.

This is most likely caused by a change in dpkg 1.22.6, that enabled
-Werror=implicit-function-declaration. For more information, see
https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS#A2024-03-13_-Werror.3Dimplicit-function-declaration

Relevant part (hopefully):
> cc -g -O2 -Werror=implicit-function-declaration 
> -ffile-prefix-map=/<>=. -fstack-protector-strong 
> -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat -Werror=format-security -fcf-protection 
> -Wall -O2 -g -D_REENTRANT -std=gnu89 -ffile-prefix-map=/<>=. 
> -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2  -c -o pktrelay.o pktrelay.c
> timer.c: In function ‘timer_init’:
> timer.c:154:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘exit’ 
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   154 | exit(1);
>   | ^~~~
> timer.c:12:1: note: include ‘’ or provide a declaration of ‘exit’
>11 | #include "hunt.h"
>   +++ |+#include 
>12 | 
> timer.c:154:17: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in 
> function ‘exit’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
>   154 | exit(1);
>   | ^~~~
> timer.c:154:17: note: include ‘’ or provide a declaration of ‘exit’
> In file included from pktrelay.c:9:
> hunt.h:410:5: warning: conflicting types for built-in function ‘log2’; 
> expected ‘double(double)’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
>   410 | int log2(unsigned int i);
>   | ^~~~
> hunt.h:48:1: note: ‘log2’ is declared in header ‘’
>47 | #include "c/hash.h"
>   +++ |+#include 
>48 | 
> pktrelay.c: In function ‘relay_add_item’:
> pktrelay.c:270:44: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 4 of 
> ‘menu_choose_host_mask_ports_dfl’ differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign]
>   270 | &src_mask, src_ports, 0, 0, NULL) < 0)
>   |^
>   ||
>   |int *
> hunt.h:371:55: note: expected ‘unsigned int *’ but argument is of type ‘int *’
>   371 | unsigned int *ret_mask, unsigned int *ret_ports,
>   | ~~^
> pktrelay.c:273:44: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 4 of 
> ‘menu_choose_host_mask_ports_dfl’ differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign]
>   273 | &dst_mask, dst_ports, 0, 0, NULL) < 0)
>   |^
>   ||
>   |int *
> hunt.h:371:55: note: expected ‘unsigned int *’ but argument is of type ‘int *’
>   371 | unsigned int *ret_mask, unsigned int *ret_ports,
>   | ~~^
> pktrelay.c:294:20: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 
> ‘port_htons’ differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign]
>   294 | port_htons(src_ports);
>   |^
>   ||
>   |int *
> hunt.h:428:31: note: expected ‘unsigned int *’ but argument is of type ‘int *’
>   428 | void port_htons(unsigned int *db_ports);
>   | ~~^~~~
> pktrelay.c:298:20: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 
> ‘port_htons’ differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign]
>   298 | port_htons(dst_ports);
>   |^
>   ||
>   |int *
> hunt.h:428:31: note: expected ‘unsigned int *’ but argument is of type ‘int *’
>   428 | void port_htons(unsigned int *db_ports);
>   | ~~^~~~
> pktrelay.c: In function ‘relay_mod_item’:
> pktrelay.c:334:49: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 4 of 
> ‘menu_choose_host_mask_po

trueprint_5.4-6_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.



Accepted:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 11:45:04 +0200
Source: trueprint
Architecture: source
Version: 5.4-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group 
Changed-By: Andreas Beckmann 
Closes: 970974 1066481
Changes:
 trueprint (5.4-6) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Fix building with -Werror=implicit-function-declaration.
 (Closes: #1066481)
   * Mark autopkgtests as superficial.  (Closes: #970974)
Checksums-Sha1:
 eb69a3cd1924d02493367ad35006971f9d263405 1906 trueprint_5.4-6.dsc
 4c3d2ff9c77e7bbf87bd70235685f43dd7d72b34 8860 trueprint_5.4-6.debian.tar.xz
 14a4ba6891c564ea357cfd3c112ecd9dfac4b698 5965 trueprint_5.4-6_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 ecfcaeecebfd8ef351844dbe6f55348a7d721db79777d93962111a4ad7647e2e 1906 
trueprint_5.4-6.dsc
 c7a14b28c460407ff531321ca31d585a48b39cc0c42e6d1e3833a5cbbc363a92 8860 
trueprint_5.4-6.debian.tar.xz
 953e8c50018bc1149048f535e759418bfd8ee3c76498c0fc4f51f5a437440900 5965 
trueprint_5.4-6_source.buildinfo
Files:
 1daf51f6f82f32488071f6138e7a6368 1906 text optional trueprint_5.4-6.dsc
 b9c448eb98ce03bc25d3103d0dccc789 8860 text optional 
trueprint_5.4-6.debian.tar.xz
 523565e3ea4b5dd4df395be44e0c9673 5965 text optional 
trueprint_5.4-6_source.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=eGAf
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



pgpWpd589lXPm.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#970974: marked as done (trueprint: autopkgtest must be marked superficial)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2024 10:07:33 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#970974: fixed in trueprint 5.4-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #970974,
regarding trueprint: autopkgtest must be marked superficial
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
970974: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=970974
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: trueprint
Severity: important
Usertags: superficialtest
X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org

Dear Maintainer,

It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in trueprint is running a
trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage:

-Test-Command: trueprint -H 
-Test-Command: trueprint -V

Executing that command is considered to be a trivial test, which
does not provide significant coverage for a package as a whole.
But these tests are a useful way to detect regressions in dependencies
and prevent them from breaking your package.

However, it is important that we are realistic about the level of
test coverage provided by these commands: most regressions cannot be
detected in this way. So it is not appropriate for packages with only
superficial tests to have the reduced migration time to migrate from
unstable to testing as that means less opportunity for testing by users
compared to the package with no tests.

To support this, the keyword "Restrictions: superficial" has been
defined [1]. Packages where all tests are marked with this keyword are not
considered for the reduced migration age from unstable to testing, and
will not be allowed to migrate automatically in later stages of the
freeze [2].

Its always better to have more extensive testing than having
superficial testing, which again is better than having no test.

Please consider i) Adding a non-trivial test, and/or ii) Mark the
trivial test with "Restrictions: superficial", similar to
[3] or [4].

The Release Team has listed this issue in the list of Release Critical
Issues for bullseye [5] and has mentioned that the test must be marked
superficial if it is not testing one of its own installed binary
packages in some way. As a result, the severity of this bug report might
be increased to serious in future.

[1] 
https://salsa.debian.org/ci-team/autopkgtest/-/blob/master/doc/README.package-tests.rst#defined-restrictions
[2] https://release.debian.org/bullseye/freeze_policy.html
[3] 
https://salsa.debian.org/utopia-team/dbus/-/commit/a80908df7d119b181eec5eb0542634a30c2ad468
[4] 
https://salsa.debian.org/apparmor-team/apparmor/-/commit/580667513a097088ebe579884b38ac8d8666d3b3
[5] https://release.debian.org/bullseye/rc_policy.txt


--
Regards
Sudip
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: trueprint
Source-Version: 5.4-6
Done: Andreas Beckmann 

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
trueprint, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 970...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Andreas Beckmann  (supplier of updated trueprint package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 11:45:04 +0200
Source: trueprint
Architecture: source
Version: 5.4-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group 
Changed-By: Andreas Beckmann 
Closes: 970974 1066481
Changes:
 trueprint (5.4-6) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Fix building with -Werror=implicit-function-declaration.
 (Closes: #1066481)
   * Mark autopkgtests as superficial.  (Closes: #970974)
Checksums-Sha1:
 eb69a3cd1924d02493367ad35006971f9d263405 1906 trueprint_5.4-6.dsc
 4c3d2ff9c77e7bbf87bd70235685f43dd7d72b34 8860 trueprint_5.4-6.debian.tar.xz
 14a4ba6891c564ea357cfd3c112ecd9dfac4b698 5965 trueprint_5.4-6_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 ecfcaeecebfd8ef351844dbe6f55348a7d721db79777d93962111a4ad7647e2e 1906 
trueprint_5.4-6.dsc
 c7a14b28c460407ff531321ca31d585a48b39cc0c42e6d1e3833a5cbbc363a92 8860 
trueprint_5.4-6.debian.tar.xz
 953e8c50018bc1149048f535e759418bfd8ee3c76498c0fc4f51f5a437440900 5965 
trueprint_5.4-6_source.buildinfo
Files:
 1daf51f6f82f32488071f6138e7a6368 

Bug#1066481: marked as done (trueprint: FTBFS: language.c:134:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘dm’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2024 10:07:33 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#1066481: fixed in trueprint 5.4-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #1066481,
regarding trueprint: FTBFS: language.c:134:3: error: implicit declaration of 
function ‘dm’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1066481: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066481
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: trueprint
Version: 5.4-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.

This is most likely caused by a change in dpkg 1.22.6, that enabled
-Werror=implicit-function-declaration. For more information, see
https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS#A2024-03-13_-Werror.3Dimplicit-function-declaration

Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I.. -I..  -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 
> -DPRINTERS_FILE=\"/etc/trueprint/printers\" -g -O2 
> -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -ffile-prefix-map=/<>=. 
> -fstack-protector-strong -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat 
> -Werror=format-security -fcf-protection -c -o language.o language.c
> language.c: In function ‘filename_to_language’:
> language.c:134:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘dm’ 
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   134 |   dm('l',2,"Finding language for filename %s\n",filename);
>   |   ^~
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I.. -I..  -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 
> -DPRINTERS_FILE=\"/etc/trueprint/printers\" -g -O2 
> -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -ffile-prefix-map=/<>=. 
> -fstack-protector-strong -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat 
> -Werror=format-security -fcf-protection -c -o lang_pike.o lang_pike.c
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I.. -I..  -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 
> -DPRINTERS_FILE=\"/etc/trueprint/printers\" -g -O2 
> -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -ffile-prefix-map=/<>=. 
> -fstack-protector-strong -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat 
> -Werror=format-security -fcf-protection -c -o print_prompt.o print_prompt.c
> lang_pike.c: In function ‘is_pike_reserved_word’:
> lang_pike.c:61:7: error: implicit declaration of function ‘strcmp’ 
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>61 |  (strcmp(fn_name,"if")==0) ||
>   |   ^~
> lang_pike.c:22:1: note: include ‘’ or provide a declaration of 
> ‘strcmp’
>21 | #include "lang_pike.h"
>   +++ |+#include 
>22 | 
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I.. -I..  -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 
> -DPRINTERS_FILE=\"/etc/trueprint/printers\" -g -O2 
> -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -ffile-prefix-map=/<>=. 
> -fstack-protector-strong -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat 
> -Werror=format-security -fcf-protection -c -o expand_str.o expand_str.c
> print_prompt.c: In function ‘print_prompt’:
> print_prompt.c:121:11: warning: ignoring return value of ‘fgets’ declared 
> with attribute ‘warn_unused_result’ [-Wunused-result]
>   121 |   fgets(response,INPUT_LINE_LEN-1,stdin);
>   |   ^~
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> make[3]: *** [Makefile:463: language.o] Error 1


The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2024/03/13/trueprint_5.4-5_unstable.log

All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20240313;users=lu...@debian.org
or:
https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20240313&fusertaguser=lu...@debian.org&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects

If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: trueprint
Source-Version: 5.4-6
Done: Andreas Beckmann 

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
trueprint, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, whic

Processing of trueprint_5.4-6_source.changes

[Debian FTP Masters]

trueprint_5.4-6_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  trueprint_5.4-6.dsc
  trueprint_5.4-6.debian.tar.xz
  trueprint_5.4-6_source.buildinfo

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

file-kanji_1.1-21_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.



Accepted:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 13:26:42 +0200
Source: file-kanji
Architecture: source
Version: 1.1-21
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group 
Changed-By: Andreas Beckmann 
Closes: 1066385
Changes:
 file-kanji (1.1-21) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Fix building with -Werror=implicit-function-declaration.
 (Closes: #1066385)
Checksums-Sha1:
 f6e60e01db579624d8eef512c0b8f8a2af19da98 1837 file-kanji_1.1-21.dsc
 53be5257b76d5abe1aaf99f337436c36f0d8a924 5660 file-kanji_1.1-21.debian.tar.xz
 c00f0c9d13ad1b8619c032e2ffc2f317a0827a47 5633 
file-kanji_1.1-21_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 6d4b30613a944f4e50bcb08112f7e188e80a9000db4d2b2510e6bb9e9216e845 1837 
file-kanji_1.1-21.dsc
 27821bfc7963a6fc10faff46aeb6d5ef2751047b36afc5407b5287130042220b 5660 
file-kanji_1.1-21.debian.tar.xz
 d80f8eef1ccfaaff9648c198473b53962504f67ada7b501bf318ae7f7a48ed0e 5633 
file-kanji_1.1-21_source.buildinfo
Files:
 79f6f4330852b4bbfbfaa751264f94ce 1837 misc optional file-kanji_1.1-21.dsc
 8822498a0f9eea5754b4d05e9e6c7a1f 5660 misc optional 
file-kanji_1.1-21.debian.tar.xz
 536b556c8d147b1053bfa074de071ecb 5633 misc optional 
file-kanji_1.1-21_source.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=0hFr
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



pgpCZHJtBEU49.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#1066385: marked as done (file-kanji: FTBFS: file2.c:52:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘exit’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2024 11:49:32 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#1066385: fixed in file-kanji 1.1-21
has caused the Debian Bug report #1066385,
regarding file-kanji: FTBFS: file2.c:52:9: error: implicit declaration of 
function ‘exit’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1066385: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066385
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: file-kanji
Version: 1.1-20
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.

This is most likely caused by a change in dpkg 1.22.6, that enabled
-Werror=implicit-function-declaration. For more information, see
https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS#A2024-03-13_-Werror.3Dimplicit-function-declaration

Relevant part (hopefully):
> cc -g -O2 -Werror=implicit-function-declaration 
> -ffile-prefix-map=/<>=. -fstack-protector-strong 
> -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat -Werror=format-security -fcf-protection 
> -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2  -c -o file2.o file2.c
> file2.c:44:1: warning: return type defaults to ‘int’ [-Wimplicit-int]
>44 | main(argc,argv)
>   | ^~~~
> file2.c: In function ‘main’:
> file2.c:52:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘exit’ 
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>52 | exit(1);
>   | ^~~~
> file2.c:17:1: note: include ‘’ or provide a declaration of ‘exit’
>16 | #include 
>   +++ |+#include 
>17 | 
> file2.c:52:9: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function 
> ‘exit’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
>52 | exit(1);
>   | ^~~~
> file2.c:52:9: note: include ‘’ or provide a declaration of ‘exit’
> file2.c:55:15: error: implicit declaration of function ‘check’ 
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>55 | (void)check(argv[i]);
>   |   ^
> file2.c: In function ‘check’:
> file2.c:85:16: error: implicit declaration of function ‘check_detail’ 
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>85 | kind = check_detail(buff, n);
>   |^~~~
> file2.c:94:13: error: implicit declaration of function ‘strcpy’ 
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>94 | strcpy(work, "JIS text");
>   | ^~
> file2.c:17:1: note: include ‘’ or provide a declaration of ‘strcpy’
>16 | #include 
>   +++ |+#include 
>17 | 
> file2.c:94:13: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in 
> function ‘strcpy’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
>94 | strcpy(work, "JIS text");
>   | ^~
> file2.c:94:13: note: include ‘’ or provide a declaration of ‘strcpy’
> file2.c:96:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘strcat’ 
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>96 | strcat(work, " (KI=ESC-$-B");
>   | ^~
> file2.c:96:17: note: include ‘’ or provide a declaration of ‘strcat’
> file2.c:96:17: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in 
> function ‘strcat’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
> file2.c:96:17: note: include ‘’ or provide a declaration of ‘strcat’
> file2.c:98:17: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in 
> function ‘strcat’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
>98 | strcat(work, " (KI=ESC-$-@");
>   | ^~
> file2.c:98:17: note: include ‘’ or provide a declaration of ‘strcat’
> file2.c:100:17: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in 
> function ‘strcat’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
>   100 | strcat(work, ",KO=ESC-(-B)");
>   | ^~
> file2.c:100:17: note: include ‘’ or provide a declaration of 
> ‘strcat’
> file2.c:102:17: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in 
> function ‘strcat’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
>   102 | strcat(work, ",KO=ESC-(-J)");
>   | ^~
> file2.c:102:17: note: include ‘’ or provide a declaration of 
> ‘strcat’
> file2.c:112:27: error: implicit declaration of function ‘fork’ 
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   112 | if ( (pid=fork()) < 0 ) {
>   |   ^~~~
> file2.c:117:21: error: implicit declaration of function ‘execl’ 
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   117 | execl("/usr/bin/file", "fi

Processing of file-kanji_1.1-21_source.changes

[Debian FTP Masters]

file-kanji_1.1-21_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  file-kanji_1.1-21.dsc
  file-kanji_1.1-21.debian.tar.xz
  file-kanji_1.1-21_source.buildinfo

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Bug#1048797: marked as done (tk707: Fails to build source after successful build)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:36:15 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#1068156: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1048797,
regarding tk707: Fails to build source after successful build
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1048797: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1048797
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: tk707
Version: 0.8-2
Severity: minor
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-sab-20230813 ftbfs-source-after-build
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-doublebuild

Hi,

This package fails to build a source package after a successful build
(dpkg-buildpackage ; dpkg-buildpackage -S).

This is probably a clear violation of Debian Policy section 4.9 (clean target),
but this is filed as severity:minor for now, because a discussion on
debian-devel showed that we might want to revisit the requirement of a working
'clean' target.

More information about this class of issues, included common problems and
solutions, is available at
https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS/SourceAfterBuild

Relevant part of the build log:
> cd /<> && runuser -u user42 -- dpkg-buildpackage --sanitize-env 
> -us -uc -rfakeroot -S
> ---
> 
> dpkg-buildpackage: info: source package tk707
> dpkg-buildpackage: info: source version 0.8-2
> dpkg-buildpackage: info: source distribution unstable
> dpkg-buildpackage: info: source changed by Aurelien Jarno 
>  dpkg-source --before-build .
>  fakeroot debian/rules clean
> dh "clean" --with=autoreconf
> dh: warning: Compatibility levels before 10 are deprecated (level 9 in use)
>dh_auto_clean
> dh_auto_clean: warning: Compatibility levels before 10 are deprecated (level 
> 9 in use)
>   make -j1 distclean
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
> test -z "tk707.dvi tk707.pdf tk707.ps tk707.html" \
> || rm -rf tk707.dvi tk707.pdf tk707.ps tk707.html
> test -z "tk707.sh *.o *.mid *.bak *.dvi *.ps *.log" || rm -f tk707.sh *.o 
> *.mid *.bak *.dvi *.ps *.log
> test -z "tcl2c tk707bin tk707tcl texi2help" || rm -f tcl2c tk707bin tk707tcl 
> texi2help
> rm -rf tk707.t2d tk707.t2p
> rm -f *.o
> test -z "check.sh.log" || rm -f check.sh.log
> test -z "check.sh.trs" || rm -f check.sh.trs
> test -z "test-suite.log" || rm -f test-suite.log
> rm -f vti.tmp* ./version.texi.tmp*
> rm -f *.tab.c
> test -z "tk707.sh" || rm -f tk707.sh
> test . = "." || test -z "" || rm -f 
> rm -f config.h stamp-h1
> rm -f TAGS ID GTAGS GRTAGS GSYMS GPATH tags
> rm -f cscope.out cscope.in.out cscope.po.out cscope.files
> rm -f config.status config.cache config.log configure.lineno 
> config.status.lineno
> rm -f ./.deps/defsa.Po
> rm -f ./.deps/element707.Po
> rm -f ./.deps/gui.Po
> rm -f ./.deps/help.Po
> rm -f ./.deps/play.Po
> rm -f ./.deps/playa.Po
> rm -f ./.deps/ports.Po
> rm -f ./.deps/procs.Po
> rm -f ./.deps/score.Po
> rm -f ./.deps/score_defs.Po
> rm -f ./.deps/tcl2c.Po
> rm -f ./.deps/texi2help.Po
> rm -f ./.deps/title.Po
> rm -f ./.deps/title_defs.Po
> rm -f ./.deps/tk707.Po
> rm -f ./.deps/tk707AppInit.Po
> rm -f ./.deps/util707.Po
> rm -f Makefile
> make[1]: Leaving directory '/<>'
>dh_autoreconf_clean
>debian/rules override_dh_clean
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
> # Add here commands to clean up after the build process.
> [ ! -f Makefile ] || /usr/bin/make distclean
> dh_clean
> dh_clean: warning: Compatibility levels before 10 are deprecated (level 9 in 
> use)
> make[1]: Leaving directory '/<>'
>  dpkg-source -b .
> dpkg-source: info: using source format '3.0 (quilt)'
> dpkg-source: info: building tk707 using existing ./tk707_0.8.orig.tar.gz
> dpkg-source: info: using patch list from debian/patches/series
> dpkg-source: warning: ignoring deletion of file tk707.info, use 
> --include-removal to override
> dpkg-source: warning: ignoring deletion of file install-sh, use 
> --include-removal to override
> dpkg-source: warning: ignoring deletion of file mdate-sh, use 
> --include-removal to override
> dpkg-source: warning: ignoring deletion of file texinfo.tex, use 
> --include-removal to override
> dpkg-source: warning: ignoring deletion of file aclocal.m4, use 
> --include-removal to override
> dpkg-source: warning: ignoring deletion of file stamp-vti, use 
> --include-removal to override
> dpkg-source: warning: ignoring deletion of file INSTALL, use 
> --include-removal to override
> dpkg-source: warning: ignoring deletion of file Makefile

Bug#1049648: marked as done (tk707: Fails to build binary packages again after successful build)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:36:15 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#1068156: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1049648,
regarding tk707: Fails to build binary packages again after successful build
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1049648: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1049648
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: tk707
Version: 0.8-2
Severity: minor
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-binary-20230816 ftbfs-binary-after-build
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-doublebuild

Hi,

This package fails to do build a binary-only build (not source) after a
successful build (dpkg-buildpackage ; dpkg-buildpackage -b).

This is probably a clear violation of Debian Policy section 4.9 (clean target),
but this is filed as severity:minor for now, because a discussion on
debian-devel showed that we might want to revisit the requirement of a working
'clean' target.

More information about this class of issues, included common problems and
solutions, is available at
https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS/DoubleBuild

Relevant part of the build log:
> cd /<> && runuser -u user42 -- dpkg-buildpackage --sanitize-env 
> -us -uc -rfakeroot -b
> ---
> 
> dpkg-buildpackage: info: source package tk707
> dpkg-buildpackage: info: source version 0.8-2
> dpkg-buildpackage: info: source distribution unstable
> dpkg-buildpackage: info: source changed by Aurelien Jarno 
>  dpkg-source --before-build .
> dpkg-buildpackage: info: host architecture amd64
>  fakeroot debian/rules clean
> dh "clean" --with=autoreconf
> dh: warning: Compatibility levels before 10 are deprecated (level 9 in use)
>dh_auto_clean
> dh_auto_clean: warning: Compatibility levels before 10 are deprecated (level 
> 9 in use)
>   make -j1 distclean
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
> test -z "tk707.dvi tk707.pdf tk707.ps tk707.html" \
> || rm -rf tk707.dvi tk707.pdf tk707.ps tk707.html
> test -z "tk707.sh *.o *.mid *.bak *.dvi *.ps *.log" || rm -f tk707.sh *.o 
> *.mid *.bak *.dvi *.ps *.log
> test -z "tcl2c tk707bin tk707tcl texi2help" || rm -f tcl2c tk707bin tk707tcl 
> texi2help
> rm -rf tk707.t2d tk707.t2p
> rm -f *.o
> test -z "check.sh.log" || rm -f check.sh.log
> test -z "check.sh.trs" || rm -f check.sh.trs
> test -z "test-suite.log" || rm -f test-suite.log
> rm -f vti.tmp* ./version.texi.tmp*
> rm -f *.tab.c
> test -z "tk707.sh" || rm -f tk707.sh
> test . = "." || test -z "" || rm -f 
> rm -f config.h stamp-h1
> rm -f TAGS ID GTAGS GRTAGS GSYMS GPATH tags
> rm -f cscope.out cscope.in.out cscope.po.out cscope.files
> rm -f config.status config.cache config.log configure.lineno 
> config.status.lineno
> rm -f ./.deps/defsa.Po
> rm -f ./.deps/element707.Po
> rm -f ./.deps/gui.Po
> rm -f ./.deps/help.Po
> rm -f ./.deps/play.Po
> rm -f ./.deps/playa.Po
> rm -f ./.deps/ports.Po
> rm -f ./.deps/procs.Po
> rm -f ./.deps/score.Po
> rm -f ./.deps/score_defs.Po
> rm -f ./.deps/tcl2c.Po
> rm -f ./.deps/texi2help.Po
> rm -f ./.deps/title.Po
> rm -f ./.deps/title_defs.Po
> rm -f ./.deps/tk707.Po
> rm -f ./.deps/tk707AppInit.Po
> rm -f ./.deps/util707.Po
> rm -f Makefile
> make[1]: Leaving directory '/<>'
>dh_autoreconf_clean
>debian/rules override_dh_clean
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
> # Add here commands to clean up after the build process.
> [ ! -f Makefile ] || /usr/bin/make distclean
> dh_clean
> dh_clean: warning: Compatibility levels before 10 are deprecated (level 9 in 
> use)
> make[1]: Leaving directory '/<>'
>  debian/rules build
> dh "build" --with=autoreconf
> dh: warning: Compatibility levels before 10 are deprecated (level 9 in use)
>dh_update_autotools_config
>dh_autoreconf
> autoreconf: warning: autoconf input should be named 'configure.ac', not 
> 'configure.in'
> aclocal: warning: autoconf input should be named 'configure.ac', not 
> 'configure.in'
> configure.in:62: warning: 'AM_CONFIG_HEADER': this macro is obsolete.
> configure.in:62: You should use the 'AC_CONFIG_HEADERS' macro instead.
> ./lib/autoconf/general.m4:2434: AC_DIAGNOSE is expanded from...
> aclocal.m4:745: AM_CONFIG_HEADER is expanded from...
> configure.in:62: the top level
> configure.in:79: warning: The macro `AC_DECL_YYTEXT' is obsolete.
> configure.in:79: You should run autoupdate.
> ./lib/autoconf/programs.m4:878: AC_DECL_YYTEXT is expanded from...
> configure.in:79: the top level

Bug#1066230: marked as done (tk707: FTBFS: tcl2c.c:57:21: error: implicit declaration of function ‘strcmp’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:36:15 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#1068156: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1066230,
regarding tk707: FTBFS: tcl2c.c:57:21: error: implicit declaration of function 
‘strcmp’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1066230: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066230
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: tk707
Version: 0.8-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.

This is most likely caused by a change in dpkg 1.22.6, that enabled
-Werror=implicit-function-declaration. For more information, see
https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS#A2024-03-13_-Werror.3Dimplicit-function-declaration

Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.   -I/usr/include/tcl  -I/usr/include/tcl   
> -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2  -g -O2 -Werror=implicit-function-declaration 
> -ffile-prefix-map=/<>=. -fstack-protector-strong 
> -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat -Werror=format-security -fcf-protection -c 
> -o tcl2c.o tcl2c.c
> tcl2c.c: In function ‘main’:
> tcl2c.c:57:21: error: implicit declaration of function ‘strcmp’ 
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>57 | if (argc > 1 && strcmp(argv[1], "-c") == 0) {
>   | ^~
> tcl2c.c:47:1: note: include ‘’ or provide a declaration of ‘strcmp’
>46 | #include 
>   +++ |+#include 
>47 | 
> tcl2c.c:64:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘exit’ 
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>64 | exit(1);
>   | ^~~~
> tcl2c.c:47:1: note: include ‘’ or provide a declaration of ‘exit’
>46 | #include 
>   +++ |+#include 
>47 | 
> tcl2c.c:64:9: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function 
> ‘exit’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
>64 | exit(1);
>   | ^~~~
> tcl2c.c:64:9: note: include ‘’ or provide a declaration of ‘exit’
> tcl2c.c:93:5: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function 
> ‘exit’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
>93 | exit(0);
>   | ^~~~
> tcl2c.c:93:5: note: include ‘’ or provide a declaration of ‘exit’
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> make[1]: *** [Makefile:780: tcl2c.o] Error 1


The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2024/03/13/tk707_0.8-2_unstable.log

All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20240313;users=lu...@debian.org
or:
https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20240313&fusertaguser=lu...@debian.org&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects

If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.8-2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package tk707 has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1068156

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#267481: marked as done (fails to select last step)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:36:15 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#1068156: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #267481,
regarding fails to select last step
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
267481: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=267481
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: tk707
Version:  0.7.21-9 
Severity: normal

In pattern mode to go to change the last step gives this last-step.log

can't read "font12": no such variable
can't read "font12": no such variable
while executing
"button .ls.ok -text OK -font *-${font12}-* -command {wm iconify .ls}
-relief groove -borderwidth 2"(procedure "select_laststep" line 10)
invoked from within
"select_laststep"
(procedure "ac_lastfwd" line 10)
invoked from within
"ac_lastfwd"
(command bound to event)

System info:

snurps@debian:~$ dpkg -l|grep font
ii  console-data   1999.08.29-24  Keymaps, fonts, charset maps, fallback table
ii  console-tools  0.2.3-23.3 Linux console and font utilities.
ii  console-tools- 0.2.3-23.3 Shared libraries for Linux console and font 
ii  defoma 0.11.1 Debian Font Manager -- automatic font config
ii  fontconfig 2.1.94-1   generic font configuration library
ii  gsfonts6.0-2  Fonts for the ghostscript interpreter
ii  gsfonts-x110.17   Make Ghostscript fonts available to X11
ii  libfnlib0  0.5-7  Fnlib is a special font rendering library us
ii  libfontconfig1 2.2.2-2generic font configuration library (shared l
ii  libfreetype6   2.1.7-2FreeType 2 font engine, shared library files
ii  libt1-55.0.2-3Type 1 font rasterizer library - runtime
ii  libxft14.3.0.dfsg.1-4 FreeType-based font drawing library for X (v
ii  libxft22.1.2-6FreeType-based font drawing library for X
ii  psfontmgr  0.11.1 PostScript font manager -- part of Defoma, D
ii  t1lib1 1.3.1-1Type 1 font rasterizer library - runtime
ii  xfonts-100dpi  4.1.0-16   100 dpi fonts for X
ii  xfonts-100dpi- 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 100 dpi fonts for X (transcoded from ISO 106
ii  xfonts-75dpi   4.1.0-16   75 dpi fonts for X
ii  xfonts-75dpi-t 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 75 dpi fonts for X (transcoded from ISO 1064
ii  xfonts-base4.1.0-16   standard fonts for X
ii  xfonts-scalabl 4.1.0-16   scalable fonts for X
ii  xfs4.1.0-16   X font server

Linux debian.faethon 2.4.26-neurula #1 dom ago 22 15:39:06 CEST 2004 i686 
unknown

-- 
Qvid me anxivs svm?

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.8-2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package tk707 has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1068156

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#299422: marked as done (tk707: Menu Icon please)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:36:15 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#1068156: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #299422,
regarding tk707: Menu Icon please
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
299422: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=299422
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: tk707
Version: 0.7.21-9
Severity: wishlist


I notice that your application lacks an icon. For the Debian package please 
could you create a 32x32 pixel XPM in /usr/share/pixmaps/tk707.xpm and 
reference it from /usr/lib/menu/tk707 by adding this:

icon="/usr/share/pixmaps/tk707.xpm"

For more information, please refer to the updated Debian Policy:
http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/menu.html/ch3.html#s3.7
This will ensure that your nice icon shows up in most menus.

If you're not graphically inclined, I'm prepared to create a suitable icon and 
submit a menufile patch into the bargain. Please email me with your 
requirements if this is the case.

Thanks for taking the time to deal with this, and thanks for all the effort you 
have put in to maintaining great free software.

tim hall
AGNULA/DeMuDi menu monitor


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (101, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-multimedia-686
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to 
en_GB)

Versions of packages tk707 depends on:
ii  libasound2  1.0.8-3  ALSA library
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-20.demudi1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libx11-64.3.0.dfsg.1-10  X Window System protocol client li
ii  tcl8.4  8.4.9-1  Tcl (the Tool Command Language) v8
ii  tk8.4   8.4.9-1  Tk toolkit for Tcl and X11, v8.4 -
ii  xlibs   4.3.0.dfsg.1-10  X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.8-2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package tk707 has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1068156

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#448812: marked as done (libconcurrent-java: please ship all classes)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:39:40 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#1068707: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #448812,
regarding libconcurrent-java: please ship all classes
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
448812: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=448812
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libconcurrent-java
Version: 1.3.4-2
Severity: important

Hi,


the package does not contain some classes, but there are no real license
restrictions as you can read at
:

  All classes are released to the public domain and may be used for any
  purpose whatsoever without permission or acknowledgment. Portions of
  the CopyOnWriteArrayList and ConcurrentReaderHashMap classes are
  adapted from Sun JDK source code. These are copyright of Sun
  Microsystems, Inc, and are used with their kind permission,  as
  described in this license.

'This license' can be found at

and it is quite permissive.

Please ship the classes with the package because they are important for
packaging jboss.


Cheers,
Torsten


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (985, 'stable'), (88, 'testing'), (87, 'unstable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-2-686
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages libconcurrent-java depends on:
ii  gij-4.1 [java1-runtime]   4.1.2-16   The GNU Java bytecode interpreter
ii  gij-4.2 [java1-runtime]   4.2.1-5The GNU Java bytecode interpreter
ii  jamvm [java1-runtime] 1.4.4-1virtual machine which conforms to 
ii  kaffe 2:1.1.7-4  A JVM to run Java bytecode
ii  kaffe-pthreads [kaffe]2:1.1.7-4  A POSIX threads enabled version of
ii  sablevm [java1-runtime]   1.13-1.1   Free implementation of Java Virtua
ii  sun-java5-jre [java1-runtime] 1.5.0-10-3 Sun Java(TM) Runtime Environment (
ii  sun-java6-jre [java1-runtime] 6-00-2 Sun Java(TM) Runtime Environment (

libconcurrent-java recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.3.4-6+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package concurrent-dfsg has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1068707

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#301888: marked as done (Dependency on xfonts-base)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:41:12 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#846308: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #301888,
regarding Dependency on xfonts-base
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
301888: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=301888
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: tpb
Version: 0.6.3-2

On-screen display does not work on my system when the xfonts-base
package is not installed. I'm running Debian unstable, with the en_US
locale, and with the suggested xfonts-base-transcoded package
installed.

The error message given when I run tpb from a shell is
  Unable to initialize xosd. Running without onsceen display.

I have several fonts packages installed, including the suggested
xfonts-base-transcoded package, but not xfonts-base. I get this
message when the OSDFONT variable is not set in the /etc/tpbrc file,
or when I set it to a font. I ran strace on tpb, and saw this message:

writev(6, [{"1\0\21\0\1\0009\0", 8},
{"-misc-fixed-medium-r-semicondensed--*-*-*-*-c-*-ISO8859-1", 57},
{"\0\0\0", 3}], 3) = 68

That font is installed by xfonts-base, I believe.

I'm not a font wizard, or a locale wizard, so I may be wrong on some
of the details here. All I know is that my problem goes away if I
install xfonts-base - maybe this should also be a "suggested" package
for tpb? Better yet, tpb should deal with the absence of xfonts-base...


- David

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.6.4-12+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package tpb has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/846308

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#347719: marked as done (fails to start when nvram is not loaded -- without error)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:41:12 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#846308: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #347719,
regarding fails to start when nvram is not loaded -- without error
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
347719: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=347719
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: tpb
Version: 0.6.4-2
Severity: normal

As of late, the nvram module isn't loaded anymore during boot (udev,
or new kernel's fault). tpb's init script starts the daemon, which
exits as it cannot open /dev/misc/nvram. It does not report an
error.

I am not sure what to do, but one possibility would be to load the
nvram module in the init.d script, if present.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (700, 'stable'), (600, 'testing'), (98, 'unstable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-686
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages tpb depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.67 Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6 2.3.5-11   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libice6   6.9.0.dfsg.1-3 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libsm66.9.0.dfsg.1-3 X Window System Session Management
ii  libx11-6  6.9.0.dfsg.1-3 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxext6  6.9.0.dfsg.1-3 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxinerama1  6.9.0.dfsg.1-3 X Window System multi-head display
ii  libxosd2  2.2.14-1.2 X On-Screen Display library - runt
ii  makedev   2.3.1-79   creates device files in /dev
ii  xlibs 6.9.0.dfsg.1-3 X Window System client libraries m

tpb recommends no packages.

-- debconf information:
  tpb/groupchanged:
* tpb/autostart: true
* tpb/makedev: true

-- 
 .''`. martin f. krafft 
: :'  :proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
 
Invalid/expired PGP (sub)keys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
 
"an intellectual is someone who has found
 something more interesting than sex."
  -- edgar wallace


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.6.4-12+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package tpb has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/846308

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#320309: marked as done (tpb: new terminals cannot use ssh-agent)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:41:12 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#846308: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #320309,
regarding tpb: new terminals cannot use ssh-agent
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
320309: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=320309
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: tpb
Severity: normal


Hi,

there is a problem with the startup of the tpb. Per default its started
in the xsession like the ssh-agent. 

most of the programs in the xsession are called chained, like

program  program  ..
(there is no pipe)

tpb doesn't get the ssh-agent enviorment variables.. because its simply
called, not chained by the ssh-agent.


Fix for this problem is, starting the tpb on the KDE/GNOME/.. session,
or more basic in .xinitrc in the user home.

An other fix would be, to patch it, to make it behave like the ssh-agent so it 
can
also chained in the xsession.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_AT@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.6.4-12+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package tpb has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/846308

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#462049: marked as done (tpb: seems to consume lots of memory and CPU)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:41:12 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#846308: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #462049,
regarding tpb: seems to consume lots of memory and CPU
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
462049: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=462049
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: tpb
Version: 0.6.4-2.3
Severity: important

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

TPB is one of those processes in my 'top' that seems to consume very
large amounts of memory and considerable CPU.

 3518 root   5 -10  101m  29m 9996 S  4.0  2.9  13:22.38 Xorg   
 
 3648 giridhar  15   0 20464  11m 8336 S  1.3  1.1   0:26.30 metacity   
 
 3660 giridhar  15   0 70340  31m  12m S  1.3  3.2   0:24.92 gnome-terminal 
 
 3632 giridhar  15   0 12580 1236  960 S  0.3  0.1   0:24.07 tpb
 
 3649 giridhar  15   0 32920  17m  11m S  0.3  1.8   0:12.96 gnome-panel
 
1 root  15   0  2084  704  600 S  0.0  0.1   0:00.98 init   
 

 3518 root   5 -10  105m  33m 9996 S  3.0  3.3  13:24.06 Xorg   
 
 3660 giridhar  15   0 70340  31m  12m R  1.0  3.2   0:25.17 gnome-terminal 
 
 3632 giridhar  15   0 12580 1236  960 S  0.3  0.1   0:24.17 tpb
 
 5923 giridhar  16   0  208m  72m  21m S  0.3  7.2   1:28.76 firefox-bin
 
 6010 giridhar  15   0  193m  86m  21m S  0.3  8.6   1:17.02 icedove-bin
 
10291 giridhar  15   0  2136 1044  788 R  0.3  0.1   0:00.51 top
 

 3518 root   5 -10  105m  33m 9996 S  2.7  3.3  13:25.81 Xorg   
 
19750 giridhar  15   0 11684 4712 2268 R  2.0  0.5   0:00.06 cc1
 
19738 giridhar  25   0  3348  980  728 S  0.7  0.1   0:00.02 make   
 
 3632 giridhar  15   0 12580 1236  960 S  0.3  0.1   0:24.27 tpb
 
 3660 giridhar  15   0 70340  32m  12m S  0.3  3.2   0:25.44 gnome-terminal 
 

 3518 root   5 -10  105m  33m 9996 S  1.3  3.3  13:26.50 Xorg   
 
 3632 giridhar  15   0 12580 1236  960 S  0.7  0.1   0:24.33 tpb
 
19963 giridhar  21   0  4716 2872  816 R  0.3  0.3   0:00.01 as 
 
1 root  15   0  2084  704  600 S  0.0  0.1   0:00.98 init   
 


The machine has been up for not-very-long.

 12:49:17 up  1:59, 21 users,  load average: 1.16, 0.55, 0.45

Please let me know if I can provide some other information to dig deeper.

Giridhar

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (800, 'unstable'), (700, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-3-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_IN, LC_CTYPE=en_IN (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages tpb depends on:
ii  adduser 3.105add and remove users and groups
ii  debcon

Bug#488203: marked as done (tpb: support 16 brightness on the X61s)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:41:12 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#846308: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #488203,
regarding tpb: support 16 brightness on the X61s
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
488203: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=488203
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: tpb
Version: 0.6.4-2.3
Severity: normal

Hi,

I use a X61s and the nvram reports 16 brightness levels instead of 8, so the
tpb OSD is somewhat broken (it iterates 2 times through the 8 states).

Regards,
Tino


-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.25.9 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages tpb depends on:
ii  adduser   3.108  add and remove users and groups
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.22 Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6 2.7-12 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libice6   2:1.0.4-1  X11 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libsm62:1.0.3-2  X11 Session Management library
ii  libx11-6  2:1.1.4-2  X11 client-side library
ii  libxext6  2:1.0.4-1  X11 miscellaneous extension librar
ii  libxinerama1  2:1.0.3-2  X11 Xinerama extension library
ii  libxosd2  2.2.14-1.5 X On-Screen Display library - runt
ii  makedev   2.3.1-88   creates device files in /dev

tpb recommends no packages.

-- debconf information:
  tpb/groupchanged:
  tpb/autostart: true
* tpb/makedev: true


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.6.4-12+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package tpb has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/846308

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#640958: marked as done (tpb fails to run as user; can't initialize xosd when run through sudo)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:41:12 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#846308: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #640958,
regarding tpb fails to run as user; can't initialize xosd when run through sudo
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
640958: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=640958
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: tpb
Version: 0.6.4-6
Severity: important



$ tpb
Unable to open device /dev/nvram: Permission denied

$ sudo tpb
No protocol specified
Unable to initialize xosd. Running without onsceen display.
No protocol specified
Can't open display, X may not be running!



I tried changing permissions and group ownership of /dev/nvram, but it made 
no difference:


$ ls -l /dev/nvram
crwxrwx--- 1 root nvram 10, 144 Sep  6 17:04 /dev/nvram

$ groups me
me : me cdrom floppy sudo audio dip video plugdev bluetooth netdev nvram


I also tried creating a udev rules file ( /etc/udev/rules.d/10-local.rules):
KERNEL=="nvram", MODE="0664"

which also made no difference.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.2
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages tpb depends on:
ii  adduser   3.112+nmu2 add and remove users and groups
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.36.1   Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6 2.11.2-10  Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libice6   2:1.0.6-2  X11 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libsm62:1.1.1-1  X11 Session Management library
ii  libx11-6  2:1.3.3-4  X11 client-side library
ii  libxext6  2:1.1.2-1  X11 miscellaneous extension librar
ii  libxinerama1  2:1.1-3X11 Xinerama extension library
ii  libxosd2  2.2.14-1.7 X On-Screen Display library - runt

tpb recommends no packages.

Versions of packages tpb suggests:
pn  xfonts-base-transcoded (no description available)

-- debconf information:
  tpb/groupchanged:
  tpb/autostart: true


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.6.4-12+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package tpb has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/846308

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#837986: marked as done (tpb: Please announce supported hardware using AppStream)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:41:12 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#846308: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #837986,
regarding tpb: Please announce supported hardware using AppStream
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
837986: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=837986
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: tpb
Version: 0.6.4-8
Severity: wishlist
User: p...@hungry.com
Usertags: appstream-modalias

Hi.

The tpb package is one of the packages in the Debian archive that should
be proposed for installation when a given hardware dongle is inserted or
available.  Thanks to the appstream system, this can now be announced in
a way other tools can use and act on.  I've written the isenkram system
to ask the current user if hardware specific packages should be
installed when a new dongle is installed or already present on a
machine, and isenkram now uses appstream as one source for hardware to
package mappings.

You can read more about this on my blog, 
http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Using_appstream_with_isenkram_to_install_hardware_related_packages_in_Debian.html
 >.

Instructions on how to create the metadata XML file can be found in
https://wiki.debian.org/AppStream/Guidelines >.

It would be great if you could add an appstream metainfo file to the
tpb package, with content similar to this:

  
  
   [...]
   
dmi:*:pn*:pvrThinkPad*:rvn*

  

If there are other modalias matches also supposed by the package, please
add those too. :)

-- 
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.6.4-12+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package tpb has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/846308

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#689751: marked as done (Use of nested functions in configure check)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:41:12 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#846308: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #689751,
regarding Use of nested functions in configure check
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
689751: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689751
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: tpb
Version: 0.6.4-8

aclocal/libxosd_version.m4 uses AC_TRY_LINK to figure out the version of
libxosd.  The second argument of this macro is supposed to be a function body,
but the m4 file specifies a test() function, resulting in nested functions.

This is accepted by GCC, but other compilers (including LLVM) may reject this
GCC extension, and thus fail to build the package for no good reason.

Best,
Michael



pgpkMsgroRncy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.6.4-12+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package tpb has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/846308

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#732121: marked as done (fails to start silently)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:41:12 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#846308: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #732121,
regarding fails to start silently
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
732121: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=732121
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: tpb
Version: 0.6.4-8
Severity: important


Coin,

Running /usr/bin/tpb -d (like in /lib/udev/rules.d/92-tpb.rules) exits
immediately with return code 0 and with the following errors in
~/.xsession-errors :
WARN: event_handle_error:186: X error:
request=XFixesCreateRegionFromWindow (major=138, minor=7,
resource=2a1), error=BadWindow
WARN: event_handle_error:186: X error: request=XFixesTranslateRegion
(major=138, minor=17, resource=1204628), error=BadRegion
WARN: event_handle_error:186: X error: request=XFixesUnionRegion
(major=138, minor=13, resource=1204628), error=BadRegion
WARN: event_handle_error:186: X error: request=XFixesDestroyRegion
(major=138, minor=10, resource=1204628), error=BadRegion
WARN: event_handle_error:186: X error:
request=XFixesCreateRegionFromWindow (major=138, minor=7,
resource=2a1), error=BadWindow
WARN: event_handle_error:186: X error: request=XFixesTranslateRegion
(major=138, minor=17, resource=1204629), error=BadRegion
WARN: event_handle_error:186: X error: request=XFixesUnionRegion
(major=138, minor=13, resource=1204629), error=BadRegion
WARN: event_handle_error:186: X error: request=XFixesDestroyRegion
(major=138, minor=10, resource=1204629), error=BadRegion
WARN: event_handle_error:186: X error:
request=XFixesCreateRegionFromWindow (major=138, minor=7,
resource=2a1), error=BadWindow
WARN: event_handle_error:186: X error: request=XFixesTranslateRegion
(major=138, minor=17, resource=120462a), error=BadRegion
WARN: event_handle_error:186: X error: request=XFixesUnionRegion
(major=138, minor=13, resource=120462a), error=BadRegion
WARN: event_handle_error:186: X error: request=XFixesDestroyRegion
(major=138, minor=10, resource=120462a), error=BadRegion
WARN: event_handle_error:186: X error:
request=XFixesCreateRegionFromWindow (major=138, minor=7,
resource=2a1), error=BadWindow
WARN: event_handle_error:186: X error: request=XFixesTranslateRegion
(major=138, minor=17, resource=120462b), error=BadRegion
WARN: event_handle_error:186: X error: request=XFixesDestroyRegion
(major=138, minor=10, resource=120462b), error=BadRegion

Regards.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.11-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages tpb depends on:
ii  adduser3.113+nmu3
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]  1.5.52
ii  libc6  2.17-97
ii  libice62:1.0.8-2
ii  libsm6 2:1.2.1-2
ii  libx11-6   2:1.6.2-1
ii  libxext6   2:1.3.2-1
ii  libxinerama1   2:1.1.3-1
ii  libxosd2   2.2.14-2

tpb recommends no packages.

Versions of packages tpb suggests:
pn  xfonts-base-transcoded  

-- Configuration Files:
/etc/tpbrc changed:
OSD ON
OSDFONT  -b&h-*-*-*-*-*-34-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
OSDCOLORGreen


-- debconf information:
  tpb/groupchanged:
  tpb/autostart: true


--
Marc Dequènes (Duck)



pgpKBlxKHrJkc.pgp
Description: PGP Digital Signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.6.4-12+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package tpb has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/846308

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#769678: marked as done (documentation improvement)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:41:12 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#846308: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #769678,
regarding documentation improvement
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
769678: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=769678
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: tpb
Version: 0.6.4-8

Dear maintainer,

I think a few things could be improved in the package documentation :

1. Thinkpad T42 could be added to the list of working computers
in /usr/share/doc/tpb/README (I'm currently working on one).

2. Maybe I'm going to say something stupid, but if I understand well,
most of the special Thinkpad keys are nowadays supported by the kernel
(see http://ibm-acpi.sourceforge.net/ ), so I think the documentation
could briefly explain that normally this package is useless in most
cases, except for those wanting the OSD.

Thanks for your time and work,
Yvan
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.6.4-12+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package tpb has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/846308

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#1053169: Removed package(s) from unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

tcmu-runner |1.5.4-5 | armel, armhf
tcmu-runner |1.5.4-6 | i386

--- Reason ---
NBS; ceph dropped 32 bit support
--

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next
dinstall run at the earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically
removed from the Bug Tracking System.  Please check all open bugs and
close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package
was superseded by another one.

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1053...@bugs.debian.org.

The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/1053169

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

Bug#1068156: Removed package(s) from unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

 tk707 |  0.8-2 | source, armel, armhf, mips64el
 tk707 |   0.8-2+b1 | amd64, arm64, i386, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x

--- Reason ---
RoQA; unmainained, RC-buggy, dead upstream
--

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next
dinstall run at the earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package
automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed
correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1068...@bugs.debian.org.

The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/1068156

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

Bug#1068156: Removed package(s) from unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

Version: 0.8-2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package tk707 has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1068156

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

Bug#1068707: Removed package(s) from unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

concurrent-dfsg |1.3.4-6 | source
libconcurrent-java |1.3.4-6 | all
libconcurrent-java-doc |1.3.4-6 | all

--- Reason ---
ROM; Obsolete, no longer used
--

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next
dinstall run at the earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package
automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed
correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1068...@bugs.debian.org.

The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/1068707

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

Bug#1068707: Removed package(s) from unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

Version: 1.3.4-6+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package concurrent-dfsg has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1068707

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

Bug#846308: Removed package(s) from unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

   tpb |   0.6.4-12 | source, amd64, i386

--- Reason ---
RoQA; orphaned, abandoned upstream
--

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next
dinstall run at the earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package
automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed
correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 846...@bugs.debian.org.

The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/846308

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

Bug#846308: Removed package(s) from unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

Version: 0.6.4-12+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package tpb has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/846308

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

w3c-markup-validator_1.3+dfsg-5_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.



Accepted:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 20:25:06 +0200
Source: w3c-markup-validator
Architecture: source
Version: 1.3+dfsg-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group 
Changed-By: Petter Reinholdtsen 
Changes:
 w3c-markup-validator (1.3+dfsg-5) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * QA upload.
 .
   [ Jelmer Vernooij ]
   * Migrate repository from alioth to salsa.
 .
   [ Petter Reinholdtsen ]
   * Avoid duplication of package name in description.
   * Updated to debhelper level 13.
   * Added d/gbp.conf to enforce the use of pristine-tar.
Checksums-Sha1:
 80ccbdac4cc7de1fee53c8d72ab9905fb27e0304 2110 
w3c-markup-validator_1.3+dfsg-5.dsc
 68a862c634ca3edd0c437207c962e33bf8133382 24284 
w3c-markup-validator_1.3+dfsg-5.debian.tar.xz
 81cb3f7c9e5a3eca1078c9e0e4de9ceac213b36b 6421 
w3c-markup-validator_1.3+dfsg-5_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 bc1a60e2513dd217143420915e54b84f9ae8f2918b89984d6d1b92245d986cca 2110 
w3c-markup-validator_1.3+dfsg-5.dsc
 339bd21f68eea4dbf8d58e78390d85ba955dd119eb8af86ed4b6d1448320cc55 24284 
w3c-markup-validator_1.3+dfsg-5.debian.tar.xz
 a79577e0a8c3171769f25fcf17aa6067de8790f66f99fa47e89b5d99d226c031 6421 
w3c-markup-validator_1.3+dfsg-5_source.buildinfo
Files:
 1f128684ba5ad846f0bffa80e2b50844 2110 web optional 
w3c-markup-validator_1.3+dfsg-5.dsc
 e92ee275a0886e79d5225d98344d0875 24284 web optional 
w3c-markup-validator_1.3+dfsg-5.debian.tar.xz
 f3b253ea175e9fe25e605a4c0c41c6e4 6421 web optional 
w3c-markup-validator_1.3+dfsg-5_source.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=vLxR
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



pgp4iMKLwD1f_.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Processing of w3c-markup-validator_1.3+dfsg-5_source.changes

[Debian FTP Masters]

w3c-markup-validator_1.3+dfsg-5_source.changes uploaded successfully to 
localhost
along with the files:
  w3c-markup-validator_1.3+dfsg-5.dsc
  w3c-markup-validator_1.3+dfsg-5.debian.tar.xz
  w3c-markup-validator_1.3+dfsg-5_source.buildinfo

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Bug#1042467: (No Subject)

[mYnDstrEAm]

Same here on multiple Debian/KDE machines after upgrading to Debian12. I think 
the title should be clearer or should this package actually be installed? I 
doubt it. For me it wants to remove way more than 30 packages, many of them 
being essential packages.

See 
https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/748950/after-upgrading-to-debian12-and-upgrading-packages-apt-shows-the-following-pack
 Also this issue tracker is totally outdated. By decades. And nearly unusable, 
which is a problem if the project is interested in getting more devs involved.

Bug#1065774: libdigidoc: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: /<>/libdigidoc/DigiDocService.c:327:19: error: implicit declaration of function ‘ddocAddSignatureFromMemory’ [-Werror=implicit-function-decla

[Steve Langasek]

Package: libdigidoc
Followup-For: Bug #1065774
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch
Control: tags -1 patch

Please find attached a patch for this issue that has been uploaded to
Ubuntu.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer   https://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
diff -Nru libdigidoc-3.10.5/debian/patches/no-implicit-declarations.patch 
libdigidoc-3.10.5/debian/patches/no-implicit-declarations.patch
--- libdigidoc-3.10.5/debian/patches/no-implicit-declarations.patch 
1969-12-31 16:00:00.0 -0800
+++ libdigidoc-3.10.5/debian/patches/no-implicit-declarations.patch 
2024-04-10 16:10:25.0 -0700
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+Description: add missing define and includes required for prototypes
+Author: Steve Langasek 
+Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/1065774
+Last-Update: 2024-04-10
+Forwarded: no
+
+Index: libdigidoc-3.10.5/libdigidoc/DigiDocVerify.c
+===
+--- libdigidoc-3.10.5.orig/libdigidoc/DigiDocVerify.c
 libdigidoc-3.10.5/libdigidoc/DigiDocVerify.c
+@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
+ //  Creation
+ //==
+ 
++#define WITH_DEPRECATED_FUNCTIONS
+ #include "DigiDocVerify.h"
+ #include "DigiDocError.h"
+ #include "DigiDocLib.h"
+Index: libdigidoc-3.10.5/libdigidoc/DigiDocService.c
+===
+--- libdigidoc-3.10.5.orig/libdigidoc/DigiDocService.c
 libdigidoc-3.10.5/libdigidoc/DigiDocService.c
+@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
+ #include 
+ #include 
+ #include 
++#include 
+ #include 
+ #include 
+ #include 
diff -Nru libdigidoc-3.10.5/debian/patches/series 
libdigidoc-3.10.5/debian/patches/series
--- libdigidoc-3.10.5/debian/patches/series 2022-07-10 19:12:11.0 
-0700
+++ libdigidoc-3.10.5/debian/patches/series 2024-04-10 16:08:47.0 
-0700
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
 versioninfo.cmake-set-build_date-using-u.patch
 build-with-openssl-v3.patch
 fix-national-encoding.patch
+no-implicit-declarations.patch

Processed: Re: libdigidoc: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: /<>/libdigidoc/DigiDocService.c:327:19: error: implicit declaration of function ‘ddocAddSignatureFromMemory’ [-Werror=implicit-function-dec

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 patch
Bug #1065774 [src:libdigidoc] libdigidoc: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: 
/<>/libdigidoc/DigiDocService.c:327:19: error: implicit 
declaration of function ‘ddocAddSignatureFromMemory’ 
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Added tag(s) patch.

-- 
1065774: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065774
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

dvbackup is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

dvbackup 1:0.0.4-9 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2024-04-11

It is affected by these RC bugs:
1066238: dvbackup: FTBFS: dvconnect.c:264:33: error: implicit declaration of 
function ‘memcpy’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
 https://bugs.debian.org/1066238



This mail is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl

Autoremoval data is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl

citadel-client is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

citadel-client 916-4 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2024-04-11

It is affected by these RC bugs:
1066221: citadel-client: FTBFS: src/routines2.c:370:29: error: implicit 
declaration of function ‘ka_wait’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
 https://bugs.debian.org/1066221



This mail is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl

Autoremoval data is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl

ftpcopy is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

ftpcopy 0.6.7-6 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2024-04-11

It is affected by these RC bugs:
1066223: ftpcopy: FTBFS: conftest1663576.c:7:9: error: implicit declaration of 
function ‘_exit’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
 https://bugs.debian.org/1066223



This mail is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl

Autoremoval data is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl

filter is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

filter 2.6.3+ds1-3 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2024-04-11

It is affected by these RC bugs:
1066368: filter: FTBFS: actions.c:255:21: error: implicit declaration of 
function ‘wait’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
 https://bugs.debian.org/1066368



This mail is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl

Autoremoval data is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl

dot-forward is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

dot-forward 1:0.71-6 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2024-04-11

It is affected by these RC bugs:
1066462: dot-forward: FTBFS: control.c:65:41: error: implicit declaration of 
function ‘close’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
 https://bugs.debian.org/1066462



This mail is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl

Autoremoval data is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl

tinydyndns is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

tinydyndns 0.4.2.debian1-2 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2024-04-11

It is affected by these RC bugs:
1066492: tinydyndns: FTBFS: seek_set.c:7:7: error: implicit declaration of 
function ‘lseek’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
 https://bugs.debian.org/1066492



This mail is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl

Autoremoval data is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl

rdiff-backup-fs is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

rdiff-backup-fs 1.0.0-7 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2024-04-11

It is affected by these RC bugs:
1066496: rdiff-backup-fs: FTBFS: gstats.h:44:30: error: implicit declaration of 
function ‘time’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
 https://bugs.debian.org/1066496



This mail is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl

Autoremoval data is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl

gramofile is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

gramofile 1.6-12 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2024-04-11

It is affected by these RC bugs:
1066587: gramofile: FTBFS: gramofile.c:42:3: error: implicit declaration of 
function ‘exit’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
 https://bugs.debian.org/1066587



This mail is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl

Autoremoval data is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl

gnomad2 is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

gnomad2 2.9.6-8 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2024-04-11

It is affected by these RC bugs:
1066610: gnomad2: FTBFS: jukebox.c:1979:13: error: implicit declaration of 
function ‘set_tag_for_file’; did you mean ‘set_tag_for_mp3file’? 
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
 https://bugs.debian.org/1066610



This mail is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl

Autoremoval data is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl

lua-svn is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

lua-svn 0.4.0-10 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2024-04-11

It is affected by these RC bugs:
1066626: lua-svn: FTBFS: src/luasvn.c:1306:13: error: implicit declaration of 
function ‘svn_prop_needs_translation’ 
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
 https://bugs.debian.org/1066626



This mail is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl

Autoremoval data is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl

spectools is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

spectools 201601r1-3 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2024-04-11

It is affected by these RC bugs:
1066651: spectools: FTBFS: wispy_hw_gen1.c:296:15: error: implicit declaration 
of function ‘wispy24x_adler_checksum’; did you mean 
‘wispy1_adler_checksum’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
 https://bugs.debian.org/1066651



This mail is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl

Autoremoval data is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl

sup is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

sup 20100519-3 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2024-04-11

It is affected by these RC bugs:
1066658: sup: FTBFS: scm.c:316:9: error: implicit declaration of function 
‘setproctitle’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
 https://bugs.debian.org/1066658



This mail is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl

Autoremoval data is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl

ldap2dns is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

ldap2dns 0.3.1-5 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2024-04-11

It is affected by these RC bugs:
1066670: ldap2dns: FTBFS: ldap2dns.c:477:25: error: implicit declaration of 
function ‘ldap_search_s’; did you mean ‘ldap_search_ext’? 
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
 https://bugs.debian.org/1066670



This mail is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl

Autoremoval data is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl

seyon is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

seyon 2.20c-34 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2024-04-11

It is affected by these RC bugs:
1066720: seyon: FTBFS: SeGeneric.c:222:16: error: implicit declaration of 
function ‘time’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
 https://bugs.debian.org/1066720



This mail is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl

Autoremoval data is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl

easyh10 is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

easyh10 1.5-5 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2024-04-11

It is affected by these RC bugs:
1066567: easyh10: FTBFS: ucs2char_iconv.c:319:25: error: implicit declaration 
of function ‘close’; did you mean ‘pclose’? 
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
 https://bugs.debian.org/1066567



This mail is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl

Autoremoval data is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl

clipit is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

clipit 1.4.5+git20210313-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2024-04-17

It is affected by these RC bugs:
1066289: clipit: FTBFS: main.c:1080:9: error: implicit declaration of function 
‘umask’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
 https://bugs.debian.org/1066289



This mail is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl

Autoremoval data is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl

xfrisk is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

xfrisk 1.2-8 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2024-04-19

It is affected by these RC bugs:
1066617: xfrisk: FTBFS: aiStubs.c:88:45: error: implicit declaration of 
function ‘exit’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
 https://bugs.debian.org/1066617



This mail is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl

Autoremoval data is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl

trickle is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

trickle 1.07-12 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2024-04-18

It is affected by these RC bugs:
1066604: trickle: FTBFS: configure: error: Couldn't figure out how to access 
libc
 https://bugs.debian.org/1066604



This mail is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl

Autoremoval data is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl

xshisen is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

xshisen 1:1.51-7 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2024-04-19

It is affected by these RC bugs:
1066426: xshisen: FTBFS: main.C:149:71: error: ‘rand’ was not declared in 
this scope
 https://bugs.debian.org/1066426



This mail is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl

Autoremoval data is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl

trueprint is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

trueprint 5.4-5 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2024-04-25

It is affected by these RC bugs:
1066481: trueprint: FTBFS: language.c:134:3: error: implicit declaration of 
function ‘dm’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
 https://bugs.debian.org/1066481



This mail is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl

Autoremoval data is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl

file-kanji is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

file-kanji 1.1-20 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2024-04-25

It is affected by these RC bugs:
1066385: file-kanji: FTBFS: file2.c:52:9: error: implicit declaration of 
function ‘exit’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
 https://bugs.debian.org/1066385



This mail is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl

Autoremoval data is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl

dvi2dvi is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

dvi2dvi 2.0alpha-10 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2024-04-26

It is affected by these RC bugs:
1066297: dvi2dvi: FTBFS: fontcom.c:45:9: error: implicit declaration of 
function ‘replfont’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
 https://bugs.debian.org/1066297



This mail is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl

Autoremoval data is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl

gkrelluim is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

gkrelluim 0.3.2-2 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2024-04-26

It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
1066433: uim: FTBFS: bsd-snprintf.c:104:38: error: assignment to expression 
with array type
 https://bugs.debian.org/1066433



This mail is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl

Autoremoval data is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl

nmzmail is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

nmzmail 1.1-4 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2024-04-26

It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
1066575: kakasi: FTBFS: configure: error: can not use EUC-JP or UTF-8 encoding 
on iconv
 https://bugs.debian.org/1066575



This mail is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl

Autoremoval data is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl

django-organizations is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

django-organizations 2.3.1-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 
2024-04-26

It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
1066753: python-django-extensions: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test 
--test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.12 3.11" returned exit code 13
 https://bugs.debian.org/1066753



This mail is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl

Autoremoval data is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl

weplab is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

weplab 0.1.5-6 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2024-05-04

It is affected by these RC bugs:
1066521: weplab: FTBFS: analpfile.c:105:21: error: implicit declaration of 
function ‘GetPacketBssid’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
 https://bugs.debian.org/1066521



This mail is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl

Autoremoval data is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl

amavisd-milter is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

amavisd-milter 1.7.2-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2024-05-09

It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
1066420: sendmail: FTBFS: ./debian/./debian/conftest.c:37:(.text.startup+0xb): 
undefined reference to `__res_query'
 https://bugs.debian.org/1066420



This mail is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl

Autoremoval data is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl

sendmail is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

sendmail 8.18.1-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2024-05-09

It is affected by these RC bugs:
1066420: sendmail: FTBFS: ./debian/./debian/conftest.c:37:(.text.startup+0xb): 
undefined reference to `__res_query'
 https://bugs.debian.org/1066420



This mail is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl

Autoremoval data is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl

c-icap-modules is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

c-icap-modules 1:0.5.5-2 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2024-05-09

It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
1066420: sendmail: FTBFS: ./debian/./debian/conftest.c:37:(.text.startup+0xb): 
undefined reference to `__res_query'
 https://bugs.debian.org/1066420



This mail is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl

Autoremoval data is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl

milter-greylist is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

milter-greylist 4.6.4-3 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2024-05-09

It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
1066420: sendmail: FTBFS: ./debian/./debian/conftest.c:37:(.text.startup+0xb): 
undefined reference to `__res_query'
 https://bugs.debian.org/1066420



This mail is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl

Autoremoval data is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl

sawfish-themes is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

sawfish-themes 0.13.0-2 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2024-05-10

It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
1066440: librep: FTBFS with -Werror=implicit-function-declaration
 https://bugs.debian.org/1066440



This mail is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl

Autoremoval data is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl

openwince-jtag is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

openwince-jtag 0.5.1-8 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2024-04-11

It is affected by these RC bugs:
1066516: openwince-jtag: FTBFS: flash/cfi.c:84:9: error: implicit declaration 
of function ‘printf’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
 https://bugs.debian.org/1066516



This mail is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl

Autoremoval data is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl

hunt is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

hunt 1.5-8 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2024-04-25

It is affected by these RC bugs:
1066712: hunt: FTBFS: timer.c:154:17: error: implicit declaration of function 
‘exit’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
 https://bugs.debian.org/1066712



This mail is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl

Autoremoval data is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl

canna is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

canna 3.7p3-20 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2024-04-26

It is affected by these RC bugs:
1066375: canna: FTBFS: context.c:105:13: error: implicit declaration of 
function ‘mkdir’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
 https://bugs.debian.org/1066375



This mail is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl

Autoremoval data is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl

wily is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

wily 0.13.42-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2024-04-19

It is affected by these RC bugs:
1066343: wily: FTBFS: getrect.c:27:17: error: implicit declaration of function 
‘sleep’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
 https://bugs.debian.org/1066343



This mail is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl

Autoremoval data is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl

xscavenger is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

xscavenger 1.4.5-5 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2024-04-19

It is affected by these RC bugs:
1066550: xscavenger: FTBFS: sound.c:158:9: error: implicit declaration of 
function ‘doall’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
 https://bugs.debian.org/1066550



This mail is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl

Autoremoval data is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl

canna-shion is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

canna-shion 0.0.20010204-13 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2024-04-26

It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
1066375: canna: FTBFS: context.c:105:13: error: implicit declaration of 
function ‘mkdir’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
 https://bugs.debian.org/1066375



This mail is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl

Autoremoval data is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl

ots is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

ots 0.5.0-8 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2024-04-26

It is affected by these RC bugs:
1066648: ots: FTBFS: grader-tf.c:108:9: error: implicit declaration of function 
‘log’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
 https://bugs.debian.org/1066648



This mail is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl

Autoremoval data is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl

ng is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

ng 1.5~beta1-10 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2024-04-26

It is affected by these RC bugs:
1066688: ng: FTBFS: dir.c:127:11: error: implicit declaration of function 
‘rchdir’; did you mean ‘vchdir’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
 https://bugs.debian.org/1066688

It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
1066375: canna: FTBFS: context.c:105:13: error: implicit declaration of 
function ‘mkdir’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
 https://bugs.debian.org/1066375



This mail is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl

Autoremoval data is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl