Bug#170502: marked as done (lightspeed: Alpha: lightspeed crashes when animation is stopped)

2023-05-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Mon, 08 May 2023 13:31:57 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#1035731: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #170502,
regarding lightspeed: Alpha: lightspeed crashes when animation is stopped
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
170502: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=170502
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: lightspeed
Version: 1.2-2
Severity: normal

I played a little to reproduce 65993 and noticed that lightspeed
crashes (dumps core) by the following procedure:

*start lightspeed
*Options-Animation
*Press Begin
*Press Stop

I include two core dumps, the first one hase been done by this
procedure, the latter I obtained by my first play arounds but I
believe they are both by the same cause.


GNU gdb 2002-04-01-cvs
Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions.
Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB.  Type "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "alpha-linux"...
Core was generated by `lightspeed'.
Program terminated with signal 8, Arithmetic exception.
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libgtkgl.so.5...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libgtkgl.so.5
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libgtk-1.2.so.0...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libgtk-1.2.so.0
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libgdk-1.2.so.0...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libgdk-1.2.so.0
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libgmodule-1.2.so.0...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libgmodule-1.2.so.0
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libglib-1.2.so.0...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libglib-1.2.so.0
Reading symbols from /lib/libdl.so.2.1...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libdl.so.2.1
Reading symbols from /usr/X11R6/lib/libXi.so.6...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/X11R6/lib/libXi.so.6
Reading symbols from /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6
Reading symbols from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6
Reading symbols from /lib/libm.so.6.1...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libm.so.6.1
Reading symbols from /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libpng.so.3...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libpng.so.3
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libz.so.1...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libz.so.1
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libtiff.so.3...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libtiff.so.3
Reading symbols from /lib/libc.so.6.1...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libc.so.6.1
Reading symbols from /usr/X11R6/lib/libGLU.so.1...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/X11R6/lib/libGLU.so.1
Reading symbols from /lib/libpthread.so.0...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libpthread.so.0
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62
Reading symbols from /lib/ld-linux.so.2...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/ld-linux.so.2
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3
Reading symbols from /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/common/xlcDef.so.2...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/common/xlcDef.so.2
Reading symbols from /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/common/ximcp.so.2...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/common/ximcp.so.2
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/gconv/ISO8859-15.so...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/gconv/ISO8859-15.so
Reading symbols from /lib/libnss_compat.so.2...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libnss_compat.so.2
Reading symbols from /lib/libnsl.so.1.1...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libnsl.so.1.1
Reading symbols from /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/common/xomGeneric.so.2...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/common/xomGeneric.so.2
#0  0x120031774 in warp_time (x0=0, x1=0, value=0, message=20) at warp.c:572
572 warp.c: No such file or directory.
in warp.c
[New Thread 1024 (LWP 14961)]

Program received signal SIGFPE, Arithmetic exception.
[Switching to Thread 1024 (LWP 14961)]
0x120031774 in warp_time (x0=0, x1=0, value=0, message=20) at warp.c:572
572 in warp.c
#0  0x120031774 in warp_time (x0=0, x1=0, value=0, message=20) at warp.c:572
anim_x0 = -2.6189
anim_x1 = 2.6189
anim_percent = 0.552728117
cam = (camera *) 0x1200a3fc0
dx = 6.1871919631958008
dy = 0.95582622289657593
dz = 0.6511806845664978
an

Bug#197323: marked as done (lightspeed: with LANG=fr_FR, speed of 0,5c is rounded to 1c)

2023-05-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Mon, 08 May 2023 13:31:57 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#1035731: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #197323,
regarding lightspeed: with LANG=fr_FR, speed of 0,5c is rounded to 1c
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
197323: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=197323
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: lightspeed
Version: 1.2-4
Severity: normal

Hello Ola,

With LANG=fr_FR, you cannot enter fractionnal speed in 'c' unit,
neither as 0.5 or 0,5. They are rounded to 1.0.

The decimal separator in french is ','.

Cheers,
-- 
Bill. 

Imagine a large red swirl here. 

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux seventeen 2.4.20 #1 Mon Apr 14 16:02:08 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=français, LC_CTYPE=français

Versions of packages lightspeed depends on:
ii  gtkglarea51.2.3-2Gimp Toolkit OpenGL area widget sh
ii  libc6 2.3.1-17   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libglib1.21.2.10-9   The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk1.2 1.2.10-16  The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo
ii  libpng2   1.0.15-4   PNG library, older version - runti
ii  libtiff3g 3.5.7-2Tag Image File Format library
ii  xlibmesa3 4.2.1-8XFree86 Mesa libraries pseudopacka
ii  xlibmesa3-gl [libgl1] 4.2.1-8Mesa 3D graphics library [XFree86]
ii  xlibs 4.2.1-8X Window System client libraries
ii  zlib1g1:1.1.4-12 compression library - runtime

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.2a.debian.1-5+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package lightspeed has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1035731

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#492375: marked as done (Rendering problems (table cells and Vietnamese))

2023-05-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Mon, 08 May 2023 13:30:58 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#1035722: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #492375,
regarding Rendering problems (table cells and Vietnamese)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
492375: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=492375
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xmlroff
Version: 0.6.0-1
Severity: normal

Some characters are rendered pixelised and in some - rare -
cases the table renderer seems to cut the last line of a row.
See attached screenshot. DocBook source and fo.xsl attached.
Use: $ xmlroff --backend=cairo test-vi.dbk fo.xsl

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable

Locale: LANG=es_AR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_AR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages xmlroff depends on:
ii  libc6  2.7-12GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libcairo2  1.6.4-6   The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra
ii  libglib2.0-0   2.16.4-2  The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgnomeprint2.2-0 2.18.4-1  The GNOME 2.2 print architecture -
ii  libgtk2.0-02.12.11-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libpango1.0-0  1.20.5-1  Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libxml22.6.32.dfsg-2 GNOME XML library
ii  libxslt1.1 1.1.24-1  XSLT processing library - runtime 
ii  xml-core   0.11  XML infrastructure and XML catalog


vi-prob.png
Description: Binary data


test-vi.dbk
Description: XML document


fo.xsl
Description: XML document
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.6.2-3+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package xmlroff has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1035722

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#519825: marked as done (xmlroff: libfo-ERROR **: area_size_request:: parent is NULL)

2023-05-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Mon, 08 May 2023 13:30:58 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#1035722: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #519825,
regarding xmlroff: libfo-ERROR **: area_size_request:: parent is NULL
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
519825: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=519825
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: xmlroff
Version: 0.6.2-1
Severity: normal

  lakeview ok % xmlroff --nocompat cn.fo
  
  (xmlroff:23096): libfo-CRITICAL **: fo_region_body_get_writing_mode: assertion `fo_region_body != NULL' failed
  
  (xmlroff:23096): libfo-CRITICAL **: fo_region_body_area_new: assertion `fo != NULL' failed
  
  (xmlroff:23096): libfo-CRITICAL **: fo_area_page_add_child: assertion `child != NULL' failed
  
  (xmlroff:23096): libfo-CRITICAL **: fo_node_parent: assertion `fo_node != NULL' failed
  
  libfo-ERROR **: area_size_request:: parent is NULL

  aborting...
  zsh: abort  xmlroff --nocompat cn.fo

Obviously, that's not supposed to happen.  I used --nocompat because
there's another bug present when I use the default of --compat; I'll
file that one shortly.

The XSL-FO file was generated by the DocBook stylesheets with some
personal fixups.  If you need the source and the stylesheets, let me
know.  I've included a bzip2-compressed version of the triggering XSL-FO
file.  I'm happy to provide any other information you need.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.29-rc7-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages xmlroff depends on:
ii  libc6   2.9-5GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libcairo2   1.8.6-2+b1   The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra
ii  libglib2.0-02.20.0-1 The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgnomeprint2.2-0  2.18.6-1 The GNOME 2.2 print architecture -
ii  libgtk2.0-0 2.14.7-4+b1  The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libpango1.0-0   1.22.4-2 Layout and rendering of internatio

ii  libxml2 2.7.3.dfsg-1 GNOME XML library
ii  libxslt1.1  1.1.24-2 XSLT processing library - runtime 
ii  xml-core0.12 XML infrastructure and XML catalog


xmlroff recommends no packages.

xmlroff suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

--
brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US
+1 713 440 7475 | http://crustytoothpaste.ath.cx/~bmc | My opinion only
troff on top of XML: http://crustytoothpaste.ath.cx/~bmc/code/thwack
OpenPGP: RSA v4 4096b 88AC E9B2 9196 305B A994 7552 F1BA 225C 0223 B187


cn.fo.bz2
Description: Binary data


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.6.2-3+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package xmlroff has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1035722

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#519826: marked as done (xmlroff: compat stylesheet does not handle RDF gracefully)

2023-05-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Mon, 08 May 2023 13:30:58 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#1035722: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #519826,
regarding xmlroff: compat stylesheet does not handle RDF gracefully
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
519826: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=519826
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: xmlroff
Version: 0.6.2-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

When I try to transform an XSL-FO file containing RDF metadata, xmlroff
complains:

  lakeview ok % xmlroff cn.fo  
  runtime error: file cn.fo line 197 element attribute

  xsl:attribute: The QName 'rdf:about' has no namespace binding in scope in the 
stylesheet; this is an error, since the namespace was not specified by the 
instruction itself.
  
  (xmlroff:23701): libfo-CRITICAL **: fo_xml_doc_set_base: assertion `fo_xml_doc != NULL' failed
  
  (xmlroff:23701): libfo-WARNING **: FoXsltTransformer error:: XSLT transform failed


The RDF metadata is embedded with a fo:declarations block so that fop
can pick it up and generate proper metadata (XMP and /Info) for the PDF.
The XSL-FO input file is the cn.fo.bz2 file from #519825.

It appears that this is due to using xsl:attribute and xsl:value-of to
copy an attribute instead of using xsl:copy-of.  I've attached a patch
to fix two of those places.  One of them is unlikely to cause any
problems because it only works on attributes with known-names;
nevertheless, using xsl:copy-of is more idiomatic, so I've fixed it.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.29-rc7-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages xmlroff depends on:
ii  libc6   2.9-5GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libcairo2   1.8.6-2+b1   The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra
ii  libglib2.0-02.20.0-1 The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgnomeprint2.2-0  2.18.6-1 The GNOME 2.2 print architecture -
ii  libgtk2.0-0 2.14.7-4+b1  The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libpango1.0-0   1.22.4-2 Layout and rendering of internatio

ii  libxml2 2.7.3.dfsg-1 GNOME XML library
ii  libxslt1.1  1.1.24-2 XSLT processing library - runtime 
ii  xml-core0.12 XML infrastructure and XML catalog


xmlroff recommends no packages.

xmlroff suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

--
brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US
+1 713 440 7475 | http://crustytoothpaste.ath.cx/~bmc | My opinion only
troff on top of XML: http://crustytoothpaste.ath.cx/~bmc/code/thwack
OpenPGP: RSA v4 4096b 88AC E9B2 9196 305B A994 7552 F1BA 225C 0223 B187
--- compat.xsl.old	2009-03-15 14:51:22.0 +
+++ compat.xsl	2009-03-15 14:59:32.0 +
@@ -186,17 +186,13 @@
 auto
   
   
-
-  
-
+
   
 
   
 
   
-
-  
-
+
   
 
   


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.6.2-3+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package xmlroff has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1035722

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#492597: marked as done (cairo backend crashes)

2023-05-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Mon, 08 May 2023 13:30:58 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#1035722: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #492597,
regarding cairo backend crashes
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
492597: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=492597
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xmlroff
Version: 0.6.0-1
Severity: normal

With the attached .fo file, xmlroff --backend cairo segfaults.
(Swedish translation of refcard, Basque and Japanese share the 
same fate). The gnomeprint backend does not crash, however.

-- System Information:
Kernel: Linux 2.6.25-2-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=es_AR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_AR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages xmlroff depends on:
ii  libc6  2.7-12GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libcairo2  1.6.4-6   The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra
ii  libglib2.0-0   2.16.4-2  The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgnomeprint2.2-0 2.18.4-1  The GNOME 2.2 print architecture -
ii  libgtk2.0-02.12.11-3 The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libpango1.0-0  1.20.5-1  Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libxml22.6.32.dfsg-2 GNOME XML library
ii  libxslt1.1 1.1.24-1  XSLT processing library - runtime 
ii  xml-core   0.11  XML infrastructure and XML catalog
http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format"; 
font-family="serif,Symbol,ZapfDingbats" font-size="9pt" text-align="justify" 
line-height="normal" font-selection-strategy="character-by-character" 
line-height-shift-adjustment="disregard-shifts" language="sv">
  

  
  
  


  
  
  


  
  
  


  
  
  


  
  
  


  
  
  


  
  
  


  
  
  


  
  
  


  
  
  


  
  
  


  
  
  


  
  
  


  
  
  


  
  
  


  
  
  


  
  
  


  
  
  


  
  
  


  




  


  




  


  




  


  




  


  




  


  




  

  
  http://www.antennahouse.com/names/XSL/Extensions"; hyphenate="true" 
master-reference="body" language="sv" format="1" initial-page-number="1" 
force-page-count="no-force" hyphenation-character="-" 
hyphenation-push-character-count="2" hyphenation-remain-character-count="2">

Bug#967596: marked as done (lightspeed: depends on deprecated GTK 2)

2023-05-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Mon, 08 May 2023 13:31:57 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#1035731: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #967596,
regarding lightspeed: depends on deprecated GTK 2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
967596: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=967596
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: lightspeed
Severity: normal
User: pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: gtk2 oldlibs
Control: block 947713 by -1

This package has Build-Depends on GTK 2 (libgtk2.0-dev), or produces
binary packages with a Depends on GTK 2.

GTK 2 was superseded by GTK 3 in 2011 (see
). It no longer receives any significant
upstream maintenance, and in particular does not get feature development
for new features like UI scaling on high-pixel-density displays (HiDPI)
and native Wayland support. GTK 3 is in maintenance mode and GTK 4 is
approaching release, so it seems like a good time to be thinking about
minimizing the amount of GTK 2 in the archive.

GTK 2 is used by some important productivity applications like GIMP, and
has also historically been a popular UI toolkit for proprietary software
that we can't change, so perhaps removing GTK 2 from Debian will never be
feasible. However, it has reached the point where a dependency on it is
a bug - not a release-critical bug, and not a bug that can necessarily
be fixed quickly, but a piece of technical debt that maintainers should
be aware of.

A porting guide is provided in the GTK 3 documentation:
https://developer.gnome.org/gtk3/stable/migrating.html

Some libraries (for example libgtkspell0) expose GTK as part of their
API/ABI, in which case removing the deprecated dependency requires
breaking API/ABI. For these libraries, in many cases there will already
be a corresponding GTK 3 version (for example libgtkspell3-3-0), in which
case the GTK 2-based library should probably be deprecated or removed
itself. If there is no GTK 3 equivalent, of a GTK 2-based library,
maintainers should talk to the dependent library's upstream developers
about whether the dependent library should break API/ABI and switch
to GTK 3, or whether the dependent library should itself be deprecated
or removed.

A few packages extend GTK 2 by providing plugins (theme engines, input
methods, etc.) or themes, for example ibus and mate-themes. If these
packages deliberately support GTK 2 even though it is deprecated, and
they also support GTK 3, then it is appropriate to mark this mass-filed
bug as wontfix for now. I have tried to exclude these packages from
the mass-bug-filing, but I probably missed some of them.

Regards,
smcv
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.2a.debian.1-5+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package lightspeed has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1035731

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#597666: marked as done (xmlroff: does not implement padding-start on fo:inline)

2023-05-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Mon, 08 May 2023 13:30:58 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#1035722: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #597666,
regarding xmlroff: does not implement padding-start on fo:inline
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
597666: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=597666
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xmlroff
Version: 0.6.2-1
Severity: normal

As specified in the title, xmlroff does not implement padding-start on
fo:inline.  From the attached file, fop generates a PDF with the second
line indented 2em, whereas xmlroff does not.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages xmlroff depends on:
ii  libc6   2.11.2-6 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libcairo2   1.8.10-6 The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra
ii  libglib2.0-02.24.2-1 The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgnomeprint2.2-0  2.18.7-1 The GNOME print architecture - run
ii  libgtk2.0-0 2.20.1-1+b1  The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libpango1.0-0   1.28.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libxml2 2.7.7.dfsg-4 GNOME XML library
ii  libxslt1.1  1.1.26-6 XSLT 1.0 processing library - runt
ii  xml-core0.13 XML infrastructure and XML catalog

xmlroff recommends no packages.

xmlroff suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US
+1 832 623 2791 | http://www.crustytoothpaste.net/~bmc | My opinion only
OpenPGP: RSA v4 4096b: 88AC E9B2 9196 305B A994 7552 F1BA 225C 0223 B187
http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format"; font-family="Palatino Linotype,URW 
Palladio L,Palatino,Symbol,ZapfDingbats" font-size="10pt" text-align="justify" 
line-height="normal" font-selection-strategy="character-by-character" 
line-height-shift-adjustment="disregard-shifts" writing-mode="lr-tb" 
language="en">http://www.antennahouse.com/names/XSL/Extensions"; 
master-reference="body" hyphenate="true" language="en" format="1" 
initial-page-number="1" force-page-count="no-force" hyphenation-character="-" 
hyphenation-push-character-count="2" 
hyphenation-remain-character-count="2">TestcaseTestcaseTestcasebrian m. 
carlsonhttp://docbook.org/ns/docbook"; space-before.minimum="0.8em" 
space-before.optimum="1em" space-before.maximum="1.2em" 
space-after.minimum="0.8em" space-after.optimum="1em" 
space-after.maximum="1.2em" hyphenate="false" wrap-option="no-wrap" 
white-space-collapse="false" white-space-treatment="preserve" 
linefeed-treatment="preserve" text-align="start" id="N10015">This text is flush 
left.
This text is indented.  But you don't see 
it
since web browsers ignore tabs.  Maybe DocBook can
do something about it?


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.6.2-3+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package xmlroff has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1035722

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#967828: marked as done (xmlroff: depends on deprecated GTK 2)

2023-05-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Mon, 08 May 2023 13:30:58 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#1035722: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #967828,
regarding xmlroff: depends on deprecated GTK 2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
967828: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=967828
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: xmlroff
Severity: normal
User: pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: gtk2 oldlibs
Control: block 947713 by -1

This package has Build-Depends on GTK 2 (libgtk2.0-dev), or produces
binary packages with a Depends on GTK 2.

GTK 2 was superseded by GTK 3 in 2011 (see
). It no longer receives any significant
upstream maintenance, and in particular does not get feature development
for new features like UI scaling on high-pixel-density displays (HiDPI)
and native Wayland support. GTK 3 is in maintenance mode and GTK 4 is
approaching release, so it seems like a good time to be thinking about
minimizing the amount of GTK 2 in the archive.

GTK 2 is used by some important productivity applications like GIMP, and
has also historically been a popular UI toolkit for proprietary software
that we can't change, so perhaps removing GTK 2 from Debian will never be
feasible. However, it has reached the point where a dependency on it is
a bug - not a release-critical bug, and not a bug that can necessarily
be fixed quickly, but a piece of technical debt that maintainers should
be aware of.

A porting guide is provided in the GTK 3 documentation:
https://developer.gnome.org/gtk3/stable/migrating.html

Some libraries (for example libgtkspell0) expose GTK as part of their
API/ABI, in which case removing the deprecated dependency requires
breaking API/ABI. For these libraries, in many cases there will already
be a corresponding GTK 3 version (for example libgtkspell3-3-0), in which
case the GTK 2-based library should probably be deprecated or removed
itself. If there is no GTK 3 equivalent, of a GTK 2-based library,
maintainers should talk to the dependent library's upstream developers
about whether the dependent library should break API/ABI and switch
to GTK 3, or whether the dependent library should itself be deprecated
or removed.

A few packages extend GTK 2 by providing plugins (theme engines, input
methods, etc.) or themes, for example ibus and mate-themes. If these
packages deliberately support GTK 2 even though it is deprecated, and
they also support GTK 3, then it is appropriate to mark this mass-filed
bug as wontfix for now. I have tried to exclude these packages from
the mass-bug-filing, but I probably missed some of them.

Regards,
smcv
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.6.2-3+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package xmlroff has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1035722

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#1035722: Removed package(s) from unstable

2023-05-08 Thread Debian FTP Masters 
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

   xmlroff |0.6.2-3 | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, 
mipsel, ppc64el, s390x

--- Reason ---
RoQA; orphaned; depends on gtk2; low popcon
--

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next
dinstall run at the earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package
automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed
correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1035...@bugs.debian.org.

The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/1035722

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

Bug#1035722: Removed package(s) from unstable

2023-05-08 Thread Debian FTP Masters 
Version: 0.6.2-3+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package xmlroff has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1035722

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

Bug#1035731: Removed package(s) from unstable

2023-05-08 Thread Debian FTP Masters 
Version: 1.2a.debian.1-5+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package lightspeed has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1035731

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

Bug#1035731: Removed package(s) from unstable

2023-05-08 Thread Debian FTP Masters 
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

lightspeed | 1.2a.debian.1-5 | source
lightspeed | 1.2a.debian.1-5+b1 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, 
mipsel, ppc64el, s390x

--- Reason ---
RoQA; orphaned; depends on gtk2; low popcon
--

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next
dinstall run at the earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package
automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed
correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1035...@bugs.debian.org.

The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/1035731

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

Bug#1000029: PCRE to PCRE2 migration

2023-05-08 Thread Daniel Spiljar 
On Sat, 2023-05-06 at 14:21 +0530, Abhijith PA wrote:
> Hello Daniel,
> 
> As you might know, pcre project is obselete now[1]. pcre will not fix 
> any bugs or do release in future. projects are moved to pcre2[2].
> 
> I was wondering mboxgrep have any plans to port migrate to pcre2.
> 
> Regards
> Abhijith
> 
> [1] - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=129
> [2] - https://php.watch/versions/7.3/pcre2

Hello Abhijith,

I knew pcre was obsolete, but wasn't aware of that not even bugfixes
are made.

Thank you for the heads-up! I added this to the TODO list, and will
inform you as soon as I'm done with porting.

Best regards,
Daniel