Bug#1020771: sendmail: french package description contains duplicated text
Package: sendmail Severity: minor Version: 8.17.1.9-1 Dear maintainers, I am using current testing, with french locale. sendmail’s package description returned by `apt show sendmail` contains duplicated text: … . Ce paquet prend en charge REGEX, DB, NIS, NIS+, LDAP, DNS maps, et active TCP Wrapper, IPv6, LockFile, SMTP-AUTH (SASL), StartTLS (SSL). . Ce paquet prend en charge REGEX, DB, NIS, NIS+, LDAP, DNS maps, et active TCP Wrapper, IPv6, LockFile, SMTP-AUTH (SASL), StartTLS (SSL). . … There is no duplicate when using `LANG=C apt show sendmail`. I could not test with another locale. I had a quick look on https://salsa.debian.org/debian/sendmail but could not find where is stored this translation: for my general knowledge, could you tell me where it is? Regards, Yvan OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1020771: sendmail: french package description contains duplicated text
Hi Yvan, thanks for spotting this issue. On 26/09/2022 13.59, Yvan Masson wrote: I had a quick look on https://salsa.debian.org/debian/sendmail but could not find where is stored this translation: for my general knowledge, could you tell me where it is? These translations are not part of the package. I think the package description translations come from The Debian Description Translation Project — DDTP https://www.debian.org/international/l10n/ddtp but as I have never interacted with that, I don't know how to report translation bugs there. Andreas
Bug#991331: sid listed as affected
On 24/09/2022 11.16, Marco wrote: Why is sid (that has 8.17.1.9-1) still listed as affected by ALPACA? https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-3618 This thread says this is has already been fixed with 8.16.1. Right now, I see this as fixed in the security tracker, but maybe the metadata has been updated inbetween. Andreas
Bug#1020771: sendmail: french package description contains duplicated text
Le 26/09/2022 à 19:09, Andreas Beckmann a écrit : Hi Yvan, thanks for spotting this issue. On 26/09/2022 13.59, Yvan Masson wrote: I had a quick look on https://salsa.debian.org/debian/sendmail but could not find where is stored this translation: for my general knowledge, could you tell me where it is? These translations are not part of the package. I think the package description translations come from The Debian Description Translation Project — DDTP https://www.debian.org/international/l10n/ddtp but as I have never interacted with that, I don't know how to report translation bugs there. Andreas Hi Andreas, Thanks for the link, I will have a look to find the way I could report this issue there. Regards, Yvan OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1020798: netkit-rsh: reproducible-builds: Embedded build paths in binaries
Source: netkit-rsh Severity: normal Tags: patch User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: buildpath X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org The build path is embedded in various binaries: https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/diffoscope-results/netkit-rsh.html /usr/sbin/in.rlogind /build/1st/netkit-rsh-0.17/rlogind/network.c vs. /build/2/netkit-rsh-0.17/2nd/rlogind/network.c The attached patch to debian/rules fixes this by adding -ffile-prefix-map to CFLAGS. Alternately, updating to use dh and a recent debhelper compat version might also fix this. According to my local tests, with this patch applied netkit-rsh should build reproducibly on tests.reproducible-builds.org! Thanks for maintaining netkit-rsh! live well, vagrant From 6529f07eacdf749b1a5390933f8ac3a91093b664 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Vagrant Cascadian Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 21:40:41 + Subject: [PATCH] debian/rules: Add -ffile-prefix-map to CFLAGS to avoid embedding the build path. https://reproducible-builds.org/docs/build-path/ --- debian/rules | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules index 8049402..42ca247 100755 --- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ #!/usr/bin/make -f -export CFLAGS += -Ddebian -DFSUID_HACK -D_GNU_SOURCE +export CFLAGS += -Ddebian -DFSUID_HACK -D_GNU_SOURCE -ffile-prefix-map=$(CURDIR)=. %: dh $@ --buildsystem=cmake -- 2.37.2 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#1020800: libapache-mod-evasive: reproducible-builds: Embedded build paths in mod_evasive20.so
Source: libapache-mod-evasive Severity: normal Tags: patch User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: buildpath X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org The build path is embedded in /usr/lib/apache2/modules/mod_evasive20.so: https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/diffoscope-results/libapache-mod-evasive.html /build/1st/libapache-mod-evasive-1.10.1/mod_evasive20.c:713 vs. /build/2/libapache-mod-evasive-1.10.1/2nd/mod_evasive20.c:713 The attached patch to debian/rules fixes this by adding -ffile-prefix-map to the call to apxs2. According to my local tests, with this patch applied libapache-mod-evasive should build reproducibly on tests.reproducible-builds.org! Thanks for maintaining libapache-mod-evasive! live well, vagrant From 028d05262df50953740df4bb87f5704c78eae8af Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Vagrant Cascadian Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 21:53:48 + Subject: [PATCH] debian/rules: Add -ffile-prefix-map to apxs2 call to avoid embedding the build path. https://reproducible-builds.org/docs/build-path/ --- debian/rules | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules index 086a195..1b898a3 100755 --- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ build-indep: build-stamp build-stamp: dh_testdir - apxs2 -c mod_evasive20.c + apxs2 -Wc,-ffile-prefix-map=$(CURDIR)=. -c mod_evasive20.c touch build-stamp -- 2.37.2 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#1020806: perl-byacc: reproducible-builds: differing buildid in in /usr/bin/pbyacc
Source: perl-byacc Severity: normal Tags: patch User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: buildpath X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org The buildid differs in /usr/bin/pbyacc when built with a different build path: https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/diffoscope-results/perl-byacc.html The attached patch fixes this in the upstream Makefile by adding -ffile-prefix-map to CFLAGS. According to my local tests, with this patch applied perl-byacc should build reproducibly on tests.reproducible-builds.org! Thanks for maintaining perl-byacc! live well, vagrant From 1002dd61fdf333b0266ce59cd3053e6812905727 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Vagrant Cascadian Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 23:55:37 + Subject: [PATCH] Makefile: Add -ffile-prefix-map to CFLAGS to avoid embedding build path. https://reproducible-builds.org/docs/build-path/ --- Makefile | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index 077e9ea..1dd3c07 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ SIG_TYPE = void CPPFLAGS = $(RINDEX) -DPROGRAM=\"$(PROGRAM)\" -DSIG_TYPE=$(SIG_TYPE) -CFLAGS = -O2 -g $(CPPFLAGS) +CFLAGS = -O2 -g -ffile-prefix-map=$(CURDIR)=. $(CPPFLAGS) CC = gcc -Wall CPP = /lib/cpp -- 2.37.2 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
libowfat is marked for autoremoval from testing
libowfat 0.30-4 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2022-10-12 It is affected by these RC bugs: 1017157: libowfat-dev: libowfat byte.h incompatible with glibc 2.34 https://bugs.debian.org/1017157 1017316: libowfat-dev: libowfat byte.h incompatible with glibc 2.34 https://bugs.debian.org/1017316 1018739: libowfat: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS https://bugs.debian.org/1018739 This mail is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl Autoremoval data is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl
yatm is marked for autoremoval from testing
yatm 0.9-3 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2022-10-17 It is affected by these RC bugs: 1020166: yatm: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:6: binary] Error 2 https://bugs.debian.org/1020166 This mail is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl Autoremoval data is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl
