lunch and dinner

2022-06-15 Thread Tony Cole
Hello,

To Whom It May Concern:

I would like to make a five days reservation for both lunch and dinner at your 
restaurant for two batches of our Amateur Cricket Team from 
Northampton, the United Kingdom visiting your area on a training tour that also 
doubles as a trial for new entrants. As part of the relaxation, we 
hope to consume a 3-course meal [Appetizer (Soup/Salad), Main course, and 
Dessert/pudding] following our daily training course in your area in the 
month of September,2022. We do not currently have the means to provide our own 
catering, hence we are contacting your restaurant in regards to the 
good reviews/ratings, to see if you can serve us the requested meals. The two 
separate dates in the month of September for our team's Junior and 
Senior Cricketers are as stated below:

First Batch (the senior team) booking/reservation dates will be as follows:

* Dates: 17th, 18th, 19th, 20th, and 21st September (5 days)
* Time: 1:30 pm (lunch) and 7:30 pm (dinner)
* Number of guests: 18 (eighteen guests only)
* Reservation period: either lunch or dinner or for both as the case may be at 
your restaurant
* Our meal budget per person per meal is between €35 euros - €85 euros (without 
drinks)
* They can be seated on separate tables to ensure the Covid-19 social distance 
rule

Second Batch (the junior team) booking/reservation dates will be as follows:

* Dates: 24th, 25th, 26th, 27th and 28th September (5 days)
* Time: 1:30 pm (lunch) and 7:30 pm (dinner)
* Number of guests: 16 (sixteen guests only)
* Reservation period: either lunch or dinner or both as the case may be at your 
restaurant
* Our meal budget per person per meal is between €35 euros - €85 euros (without 
drinks)
* They can be seated on separate tables to ensure the Covid-19 social distance 
rule

Let me know if the above dates are available for both batches for either lunch 
or dinner or both as the case may be in your restaurant. If your 
restaurant does not serve lunch, kindly revert back to me with only the 
proposed dinner menu and total cost. Any suggestion on the menu will be 
appreciated since it would be our first time coming to your restaurant. We have 
no special dietary, no allergy, non-smokers, and no accommodation in 
this budget. Plans for the location of our accommodation will have proximity to 
your restaurant and will be properly taken care of by our tour guide 
who will give the details to you when all is concluded.

We are flexible with any good food or menu so let your restaurant's Chef go 
ahead and propose a nice menu suitable for athletes on those dates then 
get back to me. I hope this will be done without delay to enable us to forward 
your quota to our financial department in charge of the trip to 
facilitate the approval process. Your cost estimate should include all taxes 
and service charges if applicable except drinks which will be paid for 
at your place by us. I request for any discount attached to my reservation to 
be reflected in your quotation. If there are other options that might 
be of benefit, please feel free to contact me as soon as possible. Thank you 
for the anticipated prompt assistance and kindly confirm receipt of 
this letter and implementation of my request. Do not hesitate to call or 
WhatsApp me on the number below during regular office hours for further 
clarification. I look forward to the event and am eagerly anticipating the 
delicious meals and good relaxation time.

Sincerely yours,

--
Tony Cole.

The County Ground,
Abington Ave,
Northampton NN1 4PR,
United Kingdom.

Email: tcole...@gmail.com
Tel: +44 7438 304419 (Whatsup Only)



Processing of python-pex_1.5.3-1_source.changes

2022-06-15 Thread Debian FTP Masters
python-pex_1.5.3-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  python-pex_1.5.3-1.dsc
  python-pex_1.5.3.orig.tar.gz
  python-pex_1.5.3-1.debian.tar.xz
  python-pex_1.5.3-1_amd64.buildinfo

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)



python-pex_1.5.3-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2022-06-15 Thread Debian FTP Masters



Accepted:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 16:57:54 -0400
Source: python-pex
Architecture: source
Version: 1.5.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group 
Changed-By: Boyuan Yang 
Closes: 1002185
Changes:
 python-pex (1.5.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Orphan the package due to MIA maintainer.
   * New upstream release.
   * d/watch: Monitor GitHub upstream instead of pypi.
   * d/control: Bump Standards-Version to 4.6.1.
   * d/patches: Update patches:
 + PR318.patch: Dropped, merged upstream.
 + handle-pkg_resources-devendorization.patch: Dropped, not needed.
 + update-dependencies.patch: Refreshed.
 + 0002-Fix-collections.abc-compat.patch: Added. (Closes: #1002185)
Checksums-Sha1:
 645bb628a44faa380e183f542f09d29071588629 2118 python-pex_1.5.3-1.dsc
 e53aec1be29cf34c21f077d1109e8524fc937fae 2025246 python-pex_1.5.3.orig.tar.gz
 77942fd40e9325e2aa60c9e56bce1eb6acf6177e 5548 python-pex_1.5.3-1.debian.tar.xz
 0dfc035a67315bbe14a7c5f7d0f27163b02c9912 8253 
python-pex_1.5.3-1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 f1d67b52ecb7e589e452cc44ef6c9a95ad29be4046e13d76738481ebb1fc4e07 2118 
python-pex_1.5.3-1.dsc
 b6df10335c55af31eb177b9bd265f04dfc6b4be80f1152bfb8478f21b4d2 2025246 
python-pex_1.5.3.orig.tar.gz
 0dd0cf8d535e8b31a1d9baee86d6f3f893b9b1f4dd9e441c5f72f0ad234fb1f6 5548 
python-pex_1.5.3-1.debian.tar.xz
 74ef7c980020b77e9d64a11f4c3e2d7aaf8b01e607d3bec3439c9197a2a07964 8253 
python-pex_1.5.3-1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 51e80070efe436fb53a0add748fa85cf 2118 python optional python-pex_1.5.3-1.dsc
 651fe875a8a66a43948530b615c87139 2025246 python optional 
python-pex_1.5.3.orig.tar.gz
 ce46f8fb6e42f2bc74376dea5e12850c 5548 python optional 
python-pex_1.5.3-1.debian.tar.xz
 1e4a6519e5ab9a54e8fbf77ec69852f6 8253 python optional 
python-pex_1.5.3-1_amd64.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=KZgr
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.



Bug#1010785: gdome2: reproducible-builds: embedded build paths libgdome.so.*

2022-06-15 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
Control: found 1010785 0.8.1+debian-8

On 2022-05-09, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> The build path is embedded in /usr/lib/libgdome.so.0.8.1:
>
>   
> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/diffoscope-results/gdome2.html
>
>   /build/1st/gdome2-0.8.1+debian/libgdome/gdome.c:65
>   vs.
>   /build/2/gdome2-0.8.1+debian/2nd/libgdome/gdome.c:65
>
>
> The attached patch to debian/rules fixes this by passing
> -ffile-prefix-map in CFLAGS and ensuring CFLAGS is passed to configure.
>
> Alternately, updating the packaging to use dh/debhelper at a recent
> compat level would also likely fix this.

Turns out simply switching to dh/debhelper was not sufficient...

Probably adjusting debian/rules with something like:

override_dh_auto_configure:
CFLAGS="$(CFLAGS) -ffile-prefix-map=$(CURDIR)" dh_auto_configure

I'll try and provide an updated patch and confirm the fix at some
point... though if someone else does it first I won't complain! :)


live well,
  vagrant

> From 65c23dfcbf5fd3a59d4a3141430247225e4d4413 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Vagrant Cascadian 
> Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 23:06:56 +
> Subject: [PATCH] debian/rules: add -ffile-prefix-map to CFLAGS and ensure
>  CFLAGS are passed in the configure phase.
>
> ---
>  debian/rules | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
> index 5e25754..ae361d7 100755
> --- a/debian/rules
> +++ b/debian/rules
> @@ -11,13 +11,15 @@ ifeq (,$(findstring nostrip,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
>  INSTALL_PROGRAM += -s
>  endif
>  
> +CFLAGS += -ffile-prefix-map=$(CURDIR)=.
> +
>  configure: configure-stamp
>  configure-stamp:
>   dh_testdir
>   cp /usr/share/misc/config.sub /usr/share/misc/config.guess .
>   libtoolize -c -f
>   autoreconf -f -i
> - ./configure --prefix=/usr \
> + CFLAGS="$(CFLAGS)" ./configure --prefix=/usr \
>   --mandir=\$${prefix}/share/man \
>   --infodir=\$${prefix}/share/info \
>   --with-html-dir=\$${prefix}/share/doc/libgdome2-dev 
> -- 
> 2.36.0


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Processed: gdome2: reproducible-builds: embedded build paths libgdome.so.*

2022-06-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> found 1010785 0.8.1+debian-8
Bug #1010785 {Done: Hugh McMaster } [src:gdome2] 
gdome2: reproducible-builds: embedded build paths libgdome.so.*
Marked as found in versions gdome2/0.8.1+debian-8; no longer marked as fixed in 
versions gdome2/0.8.1+debian-8 and reopened.

-- 
1010785: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1010785
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems