Processing of pvm_3.4.6-3.1_source.changes
pvm_3.4.6-3.1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: pvm_3.4.6-3.1.dsc pvm_3.4.6-3.1.debian.tar.xz pvm_3.4.6-3.1_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Bug#997284: marked as done (pvm: FTBFS: ddpro.c:398:10: fatal error: rpc/types.h: No such file or directory)
Your message dated Tue, 09 Nov 2021 11:56:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#997284: fixed in pvm 3.4.6-3.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #997284, regarding pvm: FTBFS: ddpro.c:398:10: fatal error: rpc/types.h: No such file or directory to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 997284: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=997284 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: pvm Version: 3.4.6-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > cc -DSYSVSIGNAL -DNOWAIT3 -DRSHCOMMAND=\"/usr/bin/rsh\" -DNEEDENDIAN > -DFDSETNOTSTRUCT -DHASERRORVARS -DHASSTDLIB -DCTIMEISTIMET -DSYSERRISCONST > -DNOTMPNAM -DSYSVSTR -DUSESTRERROR -g -O2 > -ffile-prefix-map=/<>=. -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat > -Werror=format-security -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 > -DRSHCOMMAND=\"/usr/lib/pvm3/bin/rsh\" -DPVMDPATH=\"pvmd\" > -DPVMDFILE=\"/usr/bin/pvmd\" -DPVM_DEFAULT_ROOT=\"/usr/lib/pvm3\" > -DOVERLOADHOST -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now -fPIC -DCLUMP_ALLOC -DSTATISTICS > -DTIMESTAMPLOG -DSANITY -I/<>/include -DARCHCLASS=\"LINUX64\" > -DIMA_LINUX64 -c /<>/src/ddpro.c > : warning: "RSHCOMMAND" redefined > : note: this is the location of the previous definition > /<>/src/ddpro.c:398:10: fatal error: rpc/types.h: No such file > or directory > 398 | #include > | ^ > compilation terminated. > make[3]: *** [/<>/src/Makefile.aimk:375: ddpro.o] Error 1 The full build log is available from: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2021/10/23/pvm_3.4.6-3_unstable.log A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! If you reassign this bug to another package, please marking it as 'affects'-ing this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: pvm Source-Version: 3.4.6-3.1 Done: Camm Maguire We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of pvm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 997...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Camm Maguire (supplier of updated pvm package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2021 11:26:42 + Source: pvm Architecture: source Version: 3.4.6-3.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: Camm Maguire Closes: 997284 Changes: pvm (3.4.6-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Non-maintainer upload * Bug fix: "FTBFS: ddpro.c:398:10: fatal error: rpc/types.h: No such file or directory", thanks to Lucas Nussbaum (Closes: #997284). * Add -I/usr/include/tirpc/ to CFLAGS in debian/rules * Add -Wl,--start-group -ltirpc to LDFLAGS in debian/rules * Add libtirpc-dev to build depends Checksums-Sha1: 143213c1ad9da01876b5c600317bdb03e6743acf 2017 pvm_3.4.6-3.1.dsc 06ed56366554e6c394ba73e712a5308b822d442a 24924 pvm_3.4.6-3.1.debian.tar.xz e0501dd16b7f2fbacae97d96265600c9d8e29275 6586 pvm_3.4.6-3.1_source.buildinfo Checksums-Sha256: 2b9dc2154ed85a7f5865b903a279329f470830efe9dc4e261318bb4f44b2fe13 2017 pvm_3.4.6-3.1.dsc 4354211f61e5e538d89a3a80f10bde2c89c4019355f413beb9c1e4ddd0e74893 24924 pvm_3.4.6-3.1.debian.tar.xz f9aa767a81a5d49550f5bd7e3b4df86609506f89eb3d3fc0ea94e41d6ec16eb4 6586 pvm_3.4.6-3.1_source.buildinfo Files: df423d8a01dac663cb02ee62b3b8a06c 2017 devel optional pvm_3.4.6-3.1.dsc 6223bb804ffdda3b863b9e8957a225b2 24924 devel optional pvm_3.4.6-3.1.debian.tar.xz bc8fac9345e8bafe388089ccdacf8e5c 6586 devel optional pvm_3.4.6-3.1_source.buildinfo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEE/iFPNjaXdzJC6BbsuEXOUQ+bcU0FAmGKWysACgkQuEXOUQ+b cU2AUQ//R91P823RrkyTZGZaRujWx9HaDMyrIniVByy4SgPbVB9pvp0W92nOf+3E 3oveRu/vc8Bu51IuN0X+JPKNYd2KSURGkw6jhs5R0yN5UvpBRhMncKOTR
pvm_3.4.6-3.1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2021 11:26:42 + Source: pvm Architecture: source Version: 3.4.6-3.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: Camm Maguire Closes: 997284 Changes: pvm (3.4.6-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Non-maintainer upload * Bug fix: "FTBFS: ddpro.c:398:10: fatal error: rpc/types.h: No such file or directory", thanks to Lucas Nussbaum (Closes: #997284). * Add -I/usr/include/tirpc/ to CFLAGS in debian/rules * Add -Wl,--start-group -ltirpc to LDFLAGS in debian/rules * Add libtirpc-dev to build depends Checksums-Sha1: 143213c1ad9da01876b5c600317bdb03e6743acf 2017 pvm_3.4.6-3.1.dsc 06ed56366554e6c394ba73e712a5308b822d442a 24924 pvm_3.4.6-3.1.debian.tar.xz e0501dd16b7f2fbacae97d96265600c9d8e29275 6586 pvm_3.4.6-3.1_source.buildinfo Checksums-Sha256: 2b9dc2154ed85a7f5865b903a279329f470830efe9dc4e261318bb4f44b2fe13 2017 pvm_3.4.6-3.1.dsc 4354211f61e5e538d89a3a80f10bde2c89c4019355f413beb9c1e4ddd0e74893 24924 pvm_3.4.6-3.1.debian.tar.xz f9aa767a81a5d49550f5bd7e3b4df86609506f89eb3d3fc0ea94e41d6ec16eb4 6586 pvm_3.4.6-3.1_source.buildinfo Files: df423d8a01dac663cb02ee62b3b8a06c 2017 devel optional pvm_3.4.6-3.1.dsc 6223bb804ffdda3b863b9e8957a225b2 24924 devel optional pvm_3.4.6-3.1.debian.tar.xz bc8fac9345e8bafe388089ccdacf8e5c 6586 devel optional pvm_3.4.6-3.1_source.buildinfo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEE/iFPNjaXdzJC6BbsuEXOUQ+bcU0FAmGKWysACgkQuEXOUQ+b cU2AUQ//R91P823RrkyTZGZaRujWx9HaDMyrIniVByy4SgPbVB9pvp0W92nOf+3E 3oveRu/vc8Bu51IuN0X+JPKNYd2KSURGkw6jhs5R0yN5UvpBRhMncKOTRONhO5qE WU1+YXUk1HWtL+zkjMUQcrPv0LHOEzUDPevQOSngoGG3OYqD10f4eSmTM6Yd5iZM nFlyseUR7AxdtAQHrUvC7i/EhB0GX6UCzb2V/dxSMWwmLIzADb6HJpyhj39vm11Q fSGkCCwnpyqPKFbjM3x8jjy3YHImsOWyA/dayKrCxyRMb+uUEYaZwmk44VaD74PW aZDijhxJZSsY6N8PmjEN9HQJvertmSmWFUIylKwIaE2TCoPuYUIbJN7297ULEhc/ H6JQRKY2jeJCmFRH2rZ3g5/4jaqeELfnexRGXWbs3wF1KvaAFMBJSIRxMQpKlskS O8csJI9xAJWWaAi1sBW2LwRrVZkT+K+Bp2e1v7UKX/s+7EZx9itSw7vVnCzD/OQO RGeU3TluA3KT5JHPdJhf6Tf5/NxgM9gEGcO0UdNBsFCYLQ5NacwwSfvR8ITFcLTp si4CIm478e88Jboas8vab8qTYaN9T+w2ArW/BB5tHmACWY//2KMLdKTrCv6y5Llc hTFOmfp1rRDOF7dLDzCqWz55PQxYkl0C6ywHvNEDZCro/0Dzhlc= =vmil -END PGP SIGNATURE- Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Bug#998889: libcommoncpp2: Remove in bookworm?
Source: libcommoncpp2 Version: 1.8.1-10 Severity: serious Tags: bookworm sid src:ucommon is the successor of libcommoncpp2, and the only remaining build dependency on libcommoncpp2-dev in vdr-plugin-fritzbox is stale.
Processed: vdr-plugin-fritzbox: Please drop the stale build dependency on libcommoncpp2-dev
Processing control commands: > block 984096 by -1 Bug #984096 [src:libcommoncpp2] libcommoncpp2: ftbfs with GCC-11 984096 was not blocked by any bugs. 984096 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 984096: 998892 > block 998889 by -1 Bug #998889 [src:libcommoncpp2] libcommoncpp2: Remove in bookworm? 998889 was not blocked by any bugs. 998889 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 998889: 998892 -- 984096: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=984096 998889: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998889 998892: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998892 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing of pvm_3.4.6-3.2_source.changes
pvm_3.4.6-3.2_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: pvm_3.4.6-3.2.dsc pvm_3.4.6-3.2.debian.tar.xz pvm_3.4.6-3.2_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
pvm_3.4.6-3.2_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2021 16:16:02 + Source: pvm Architecture: source Version: 3.4.6-3.2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: Camm Maguire Changes: pvm (3.4.6-3.2) unstable; urgency=medium . * Non-maintainer upload * Add -DUSESTRERROR to CFLAGS in debian/rules Checksums-Sha1: 1cf4df0394044744112bfd5791fbcaf9657f9818 2017 pvm_3.4.6-3.2.dsc dd73c021927d9fa81c0b6936864658339935db93 24944 pvm_3.4.6-3.2.debian.tar.xz 5d1d929808af8477b5fd89e21ffa07f718966528 6586 pvm_3.4.6-3.2_source.buildinfo Checksums-Sha256: 9ccb2031ca8a2008f36c21199cd10ac4363fb71ecdf9f14c2cc399c64db27156 2017 pvm_3.4.6-3.2.dsc 2f10a1e3b077a6367e2ea396428fc64528d7437b52cedd13fe86243780298588 24944 pvm_3.4.6-3.2.debian.tar.xz 58b2b89a8dd5d9794be4ad269b97a690e3094286e49b0f7b319c72ead8f3dc58 6586 pvm_3.4.6-3.2_source.buildinfo Files: 6c5a880907a9a0aa9362c87808663aae 2017 devel optional pvm_3.4.6-3.2.dsc ef4f1f137c02cc3b499f77490fed3ab0 24944 devel optional pvm_3.4.6-3.2.debian.tar.xz 918b953169b6c6a4a1fb346f01371546 6586 devel optional pvm_3.4.6-3.2_source.buildinfo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEE/iFPNjaXdzJC6BbsuEXOUQ+bcU0FAmGKnuUACgkQuEXOUQ+b cU31uxAAgZ0JUJpZfj/tVsPUu8MgbExTVcs4kYOFXAB7R/L5Cq86K7HTxOd2KLQ3 TYbzNV8V+/svwok5jBL4B7xBIvSG/XI4YdsS9cc1iDsK10FQotcLuJxDsYwPUkPA DyG30w5dk5yzLW0Ty6b7fD/D0uumoXA7kBeX631+5ATe6dGN7Jf+pwjHHo0kJc+Z kiKvywRlUx9HC04UfMA0KRr3TxOEqQLiGzNwmeymc0zYjKKywEt8qVN5tXsIxDCS GHe3rmiEBlAkeWFqrcp/sOv2Vdxe/EE6Y1SA1WWxGejVd65wEAZJybzR3lz4d4iW bcrqVAFfz59ToIdg0ci46oMPrcPrqdz5Rb3W1KSMQn70UfDFgKD15YIrRGygtp4z qqjD15IciW+wbfYhv56qCuy2huxjXbRgLGGWMYQ0pq32lP/tPz9OvXUJf/ZCiWv5 h2lYnwALkdke29PJ2vHCMZvEF28sVy1Yu75SJ7UjhFSZVtdtaqlQdcLZEWT2ITCn S48QIw+z3DqzxjWTsaeKgjDYwNJ6dqcEGwUB6i0oXaLaj7jliEkICe/5b30rsgaH l44cpU1n26qZhUNyD7eiO7iSQkhlqvhhBT/Dl/zX6tz7pAN6SAQy/3CEBrY25gOr BPryV5m+IJnWunVyX1QA37qi7RYtIi6w7KXvFEzf+O4qRECGLO8= =5X1J -END PGP SIGNATURE- Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Processing of pngphoon_1.2-2_source.changes
pngphoon_1.2-2_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: pngphoon_1.2-2.dsc pngphoon_1.2-2.debian.tar.xz pngphoon_1.2-2_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
pngphoon_1.2-2_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2021 21:22:00 -0300 Source: pngphoon Architecture: source Version: 1.2-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: Paulo Roberto Alves de Oliveira (aka kretcheu) Changes: pngphoon (1.2-2) unstable; urgency=medium . * QA upload. * Using new DH level format. Consequently: - debian/compat: removed. - debian/control: changed from 'debhelper' to 'debhelper-compat' in Build-Depends field and bumped level to 13. * debian/control: - Include Rules-Requires-Root: no. - Include VCS-* fields - Bumped Standards-Version to 4.6.0.1. * debian/changelog: remove trailing whitespaces. * debian/copyright: - Updated packaging copyright years. - Used https instead http. * debian/watch: update. * Include debian/gbp.conf file Checksums-Sha1: 4d0a699ef168285b874d09e87c0b314da489be8a 1846 pngphoon_1.2-2.dsc 4f6c9b2b0138ca7d0465061baa8a27b346c877ee 5576 pngphoon_1.2-2.debian.tar.xz 58fb666143e106cc37fa5d351b271ce84a1287bb 6335 pngphoon_1.2-2_amd64.buildinfo Checksums-Sha256: bc203982ef181a5e9ea22127e4c8321e83a9865e964d57718e436ee0090feef0 1846 pngphoon_1.2-2.dsc 006a0b41245277714f6b665716eb26803c3c8a4221a704feaefce551886ae7fb 5576 pngphoon_1.2-2.debian.tar.xz 9f6a7ce900b6b820f62c149e164f45826e8c94f1b7e75e1cf971dd565d5a9e8b 6335 pngphoon_1.2-2_amd64.buildinfo Files: 674fcea691afa5187b465ac582ef03d7 1846 x11 optional pngphoon_1.2-2.dsc a28575007d66a8ae8700b0f1a2966446 5576 x11 optional pngphoon_1.2-2.debian.tar.xz d73060c8611bd05f07af6da7234b6293 6335 x11 optional pngphoon_1.2-2_amd64.buildinfo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEBdtqg34QX0sdAsVfu6n6rcz7RwcFAmGKtekACgkQu6n6rcz7 RwcQZA//U24BQTVmceTpO60c4qZvfdnS1o6nUmEJ9hc8a45CA1RqWFBq0syOHnYg ru1Kw0hrNhpgz31KHyryOs/LuztJj0dSoZkyaYNPQiV8S4BoyiSa5pMbKE/dQL6Q OXSzCZk6/AXc8u1S3UxV9JwR4xHvlmXAX8ZNAJeFCl/3sUT5U3X75nJBl+L8WLtk qj6tzuapciGatZn9Xe5b1tcKsfhUfVkot5M7T5N21KnH+oK3at+S/5dsqe1a70Wc 9hpHNnpo8n7/dJ7MEEJ+Ekc9KqPkYUe1bF7rTsBR/cqG9GTc0AnaxeokCLyFBkrO RZLjq+K2KCmypVGAK4w8xNPkbnRLm+AuEebVFrELgPap12rN/KYPC36ze77B9UnO NeIsNqB+9T5evfIM3S2g2JvhHLm4I0lqmdLNsDlzMdSGO+ec7cwYKSxc3SU4KOIe uP4dZ63YTPwUoh21mdIEPTlhxtndg2xLWt75jdPHIRS9uM6xskJg7Wb9xtOztZ4Q saDISYov2+3RJ2g35fIqZLm+DqeBUuI4GNLV/imaobBTXoOHTNIHvld0WQC0qU/E ZhDJjiGc75auGmVkhm8PCqsZYFUU0MNChRA3IXIsM4kFmMG9dZY518UY4F0tbXYA DfU+/hQT7nXICiZ0bAR6/Vpd8vTGvemu1frpfpeBM+AlAKPvpok= =8BUW -END PGP SIGNATURE- Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Bug#998917: swish++: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Source: swish++ Version: 6.1.5-5 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is required by Debian Policy section 4.9, since 2012. https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software could benefit from a refresh. For example, packages using 'dh' cannot be affected by this issue. This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@ in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/11/msg00052.html . The severity of this bug will be changed to 'serious' after a month. Best, Lucas
Bug#998931: crip: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Source: crip Version: 3.9-2 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is required by Debian Policy section 4.9, since 2012. https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software could benefit from a refresh. For example, packages using 'dh' cannot be affected by this issue. This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@ in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/11/msg00052.html . The severity of this bug will be changed to 'serious' after a month. Best, Lucas
Bug#998929: stfl: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Source: stfl Version: 0.22-2 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is required by Debian Policy section 4.9, since 2012. https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software could benefit from a refresh. For example, packages using 'dh' cannot be affected by this issue. This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@ in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/11/msg00052.html . The severity of this bug will be changed to 'serious' after a month. Best, Lucas
Bug#998941: glbsp: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Source: glbsp Version: 2.24-5 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is required by Debian Policy section 4.9, since 2012. https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software could benefit from a refresh. For example, packages using 'dh' cannot be affected by this issue. This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@ in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/11/msg00052.html . The severity of this bug will be changed to 'serious' after a month. Best, Lucas
Bug#998960: scribus-template: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Source: scribus-template Version: 1.2.4.1-3 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is required by Debian Policy section 4.9, since 2012. https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software could benefit from a refresh. For example, packages using 'dh' cannot be affected by this issue. This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@ in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/11/msg00052.html . The severity of this bug will be changed to 'serious' after a month. Best, Lucas
Bug#998964: sgml-base-doc: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Source: sgml-base-doc Version: 1.99.2+nmu1 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is required by Debian Policy section 4.9, since 2012. https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software could benefit from a refresh. For example, packages using 'dh' cannot be affected by this issue. This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@ in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/11/msg00052.html . The severity of this bug will be changed to 'serious' after a month. Best, Lucas
Bug#998988: dbmix: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Source: dbmix Version: 0.9.8-8 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is required by Debian Policy section 4.9, since 2012. https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software could benefit from a refresh. For example, packages using 'dh' cannot be affected by this issue. This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@ in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/11/msg00052.html . The severity of this bug will be changed to 'serious' after a month. Best, Lucas
Bug#999010: apsfilter: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Source: apsfilter Version: 7.2.6-2 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is required by Debian Policy section 4.9, since 2012. https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software could benefit from a refresh. For example, packages using 'dh' cannot be affected by this issue. This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@ in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/11/msg00052.html . The severity of this bug will be changed to 'serious' after a month. Best, Lucas
Bug#999014: playmidi: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Source: playmidi Version: 2.4debian-11 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is required by Debian Policy section 4.9, since 2012. https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software could benefit from a refresh. For example, packages using 'dh' cannot be affected by this issue. This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@ in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/11/msg00052.html . The severity of this bug will be changed to 'serious' after a month. Best, Lucas
Bug#999024: fbpager: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Source: fbpager Version: 0.1.5~git20090221.1.8e0927e6-2 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is required by Debian Policy section 4.9, since 2012. https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software could benefit from a refresh. For example, packages using 'dh' cannot be affected by this issue. This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@ in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/11/msg00052.html . The severity of this bug will be changed to 'serious' after a month. Best, Lucas
Bug#999030: hashcash: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Source: hashcash Version: 1.21-2 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is required by Debian Policy section 4.9, since 2012. https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software could benefit from a refresh. For example, packages using 'dh' cannot be affected by this issue. This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@ in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/11/msg00052.html . The severity of this bug will be changed to 'serious' after a month. Best, Lucas
Bug#999050: cldump: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Source: cldump Version: 0.11~dfsg-4 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is required by Debian Policy section 4.9, since 2012. https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software could benefit from a refresh. For example, packages using 'dh' cannot be affected by this issue. This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@ in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/11/msg00052.html . The severity of this bug will be changed to 'serious' after a month. Best, Lucas
Bug#999066: tmexpand: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Source: tmexpand Version: 0.1.2.0-4.1 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is required by Debian Policy section 4.9, since 2012. https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software could benefit from a refresh. For example, packages using 'dh' cannot be affected by this issue. This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@ in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/11/msg00052.html . The severity of this bug will be changed to 'serious' after a month. Best, Lucas
Bug#999071: docbook-simple: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Source: docbook-simple Version: 1.1-5 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is required by Debian Policy section 4.9, since 2012. https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software could benefit from a refresh. For example, packages using 'dh' cannot be affected by this issue. This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@ in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/11/msg00052.html . The severity of this bug will be changed to 'serious' after a month. Best, Lucas
Bug#999080: stymulator: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Source: stymulator Version: 0.21a~dfsg-2 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is required by Debian Policy section 4.9, since 2012. https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software could benefit from a refresh. For example, packages using 'dh' cannot be affected by this issue. This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@ in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/11/msg00052.html . The severity of this bug will be changed to 'serious' after a month. Best, Lucas
Bug#999088: kic: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Source: kic Version: 2.4a-2 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is required by Debian Policy section 4.9, since 2012. https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software could benefit from a refresh. For example, packages using 'dh' cannot be affected by this issue. This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@ in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/11/msg00052.html . The severity of this bug will be changed to 'serious' after a month. Best, Lucas
Bug#999115: esekeyd: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Source: esekeyd Version: 1.2.7-2 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is required by Debian Policy section 4.9, since 2012. https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software could benefit from a refresh. For example, packages using 'dh' cannot be affected by this issue. This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@ in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/11/msg00052.html . The severity of this bug will be changed to 'serious' after a month. Best, Lucas
Bug#999117: triangle: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Source: triangle Version: 1.6-3 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is required by Debian Policy section 4.9, since 2012. https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software could benefit from a refresh. For example, packages using 'dh' cannot be affected by this issue. This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@ in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/11/msg00052.html . The severity of this bug will be changed to 'serious' after a month. Best, Lucas
Bug#999122: lgrind: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Source: lgrind Version: 3.67-4 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is required by Debian Policy section 4.9, since 2012. https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software could benefit from a refresh. For example, packages using 'dh' cannot be affected by this issue. This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@ in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/11/msg00052.html . The severity of this bug will be changed to 'serious' after a month. Best, Lucas
Bug#999138: xstarfish: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Source: xstarfish Version: 1.1+ds-1 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is required by Debian Policy section 4.9, since 2012. https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software could benefit from a refresh. For example, packages using 'dh' cannot be affected by this issue. This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@ in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/11/msg00052.html . The severity of this bug will be changed to 'serious' after a month. Best, Lucas
Bug#999166: snmptrapfmt: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Source: snmptrapfmt Version: 1.17 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is required by Debian Policy section 4.9, since 2012. https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software could benefit from a refresh. For example, packages using 'dh' cannot be affected by this issue. This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@ in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/11/msg00052.html . The severity of this bug will be changed to 'serious' after a month. Best, Lucas
Bug#999167: cfingerd: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Source: cfingerd Version: 1.4.3-5 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is required by Debian Policy section 4.9, since 2012. https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software could benefit from a refresh. For example, packages using 'dh' cannot be affected by this issue. This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@ in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/11/msg00052.html . The severity of this bug will be changed to 'serious' after a month. Best, Lucas
Bug#999184: osdclock: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Source: osdclock Version: 0.5-24 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is required by Debian Policy section 4.9, since 2012. https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software could benefit from a refresh. For example, packages using 'dh' cannot be affected by this issue. This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@ in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/11/msg00052.html . The severity of this bug will be changed to 'serious' after a month. Best, Lucas
Bug#999243: iog: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Source: iog Version: 1.03-4 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is required by Debian Policy section 4.9, since 2012. https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software could benefit from a refresh. For example, packages using 'dh' cannot be affected by this issue. This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@ in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/11/msg00052.html . The severity of this bug will be changed to 'serious' after a month. Best, Lucas
Bug#999250: wnn7egg: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Source: wnn7egg Version: 1.02-9 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is required by Debian Policy section 4.9, since 2012. https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software could benefit from a refresh. For example, packages using 'dh' cannot be affected by this issue. This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@ in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/11/msg00052.html . The severity of this bug will be changed to 'serious' after a month. Best, Lucas
Bug#999252: efax: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Source: efax Version: 1:0.9a-20 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is required by Debian Policy section 4.9, since 2012. https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software could benefit from a refresh. For example, packages using 'dh' cannot be affected by this issue. This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@ in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/11/msg00052.html . The severity of this bug will be changed to 'serious' after a month. Best, Lucas
Bug#999253: ncdt: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Source: ncdt Version: 2.1-4 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is required by Debian Policy section 4.9, since 2012. https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software could benefit from a refresh. For example, packages using 'dh' cannot be affected by this issue. This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@ in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/11/msg00052.html . The severity of this bug will be changed to 'serious' after a month. Best, Lucas
Bug#999255: poppassd: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Source: poppassd Version: 1.8.5-5 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is required by Debian Policy section 4.9, since 2012. https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software could benefit from a refresh. For example, packages using 'dh' cannot be affected by this issue. This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@ in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/11/msg00052.html . The severity of this bug will be changed to 'serious' after a month. Best, Lucas
Bug#999264: libapache2-mod-encoding: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Source: libapache2-mod-encoding Version: 20040616-6 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is required by Debian Policy section 4.9, since 2012. https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software could benefit from a refresh. For example, packages using 'dh' cannot be affected by this issue. This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@ in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/11/msg00052.html . The severity of this bug will be changed to 'serious' after a month. Best, Lucas
Bug#999281: xfonts-bolkhov: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Source: xfonts-bolkhov Version: 1.1.20001007-8.2 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is required by Debian Policy section 4.9, since 2012. https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software could benefit from a refresh. For example, packages using 'dh' cannot be affected by this issue. This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@ in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/11/msg00052.html . The severity of this bug will be changed to 'serious' after a month. Best, Lucas
Bug#999288: pppconfig: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Source: pppconfig Version: 2.3.25 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is required by Debian Policy section 4.9, since 2012. https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software could benefit from a refresh. For example, packages using 'dh' cannot be affected by this issue. This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@ in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/11/msg00052.html . The severity of this bug will be changed to 'serious' after a month. Best, Lucas
Bug#999298: galib: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Source: galib Version: 1:2.4.7-4 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is required by Debian Policy section 4.9, since 2012. https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software could benefit from a refresh. For example, packages using 'dh' cannot be affected by this issue. This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@ in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/11/msg00052.html . The severity of this bug will be changed to 'serious' after a month. Best, Lucas
Bug#999304: quickml: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Source: quickml Version: 0.7-6 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is required by Debian Policy section 4.9, since 2012. https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software could benefit from a refresh. For example, packages using 'dh' cannot be affected by this issue. This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@ in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/11/msg00052.html . The severity of this bug will be changed to 'serious' after a month. Best, Lucas
Bug#999311: convlit: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Source: convlit Version: 1.8-2 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is required by Debian Policy section 4.9, since 2012. https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software could benefit from a refresh. For example, packages using 'dh' cannot be affected by this issue. This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@ in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/11/msg00052.html . The severity of this bug will be changed to 'serious' after a month. Best, Lucas
Bug#999316: xgammon: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Source: xgammon Version: 0.99.1128-5 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is required by Debian Policy section 4.9, since 2012. https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software could benefit from a refresh. For example, packages using 'dh' cannot be affected by this issue. This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@ in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/11/msg00052.html . The severity of this bug will be changed to 'serious' after a month. Best, Lucas
Bug#999323: libapache-mod-encoding: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Source: libapache-mod-encoding Version: 0.0.20021209-11 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is required by Debian Policy section 4.9, since 2012. https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software could benefit from a refresh. For example, packages using 'dh' cannot be affected by this issue. This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@ in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/11/msg00052.html . The severity of this bug will be changed to 'serious' after a month. Best, Lucas
Bug#999326: sntop: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Source: sntop Version: 1.4.3-5 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is required by Debian Policy section 4.9, since 2012. https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software could benefit from a refresh. For example, packages using 'dh' cannot be affected by this issue. This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@ in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/11/msg00052.html . The severity of this bug will be changed to 'serious' after a month. Best, Lucas
Bug#999298: galib: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
I want to help. But don't know what to do. I've made this package and submitted the ITP in 2008. Haven't listen about it until today. So I think the format of the package and all the process have completely changed since then. And I'm not using this library anymore too. Tell me if there's anything I can do to help, what I can do to help. 9 de nov de 2021 18:52:12 Lucas Nussbaum : > Source: galib > Version: 1:2.4.7-4 > Severity: important > Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 > Tags: bookworm sid > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep > > Dear maintainer, > > Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in > debian/rules. This is required by Debian Policy section 4.9, since 2012. > https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules > > Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software > could benefit from a refresh. For example, packages using 'dh' cannot be > affected by this issue. > > This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@ in > https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/11/msg00052.html . > The severity of this bug will be changed to 'serious' after a month. > > Best, > > Lucas signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#999298: galib: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Hi Fabio, is is still useful to keep it in Debian, or should it be removed? Lucas On 10/11/21 at 00:36 +, Fábio Roberto Teodoro wrote: > I want to help. But don't know what to do. I've made this package and > submitted the ITP in 2008. Haven't listen about it until today. So I think > the format of the package and all the process have completely changed since > then. And I'm not using this library anymore too. > > Tell me if there's anything I can do to help, what I can do to help. >
