Bug#972870: Should libhal1-flash be shipped in bullseye?
It should be removed, indeed.
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 972870 ftp.debian.org Bug #972870 [libhal1-flash] Should libhal1-flash be shipped in bullseye? Bug reassigned from package 'libhal1-flash' to 'ftp.debian.org'. No longer marked as found in versions hal-flash/0.3.3-3. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #972870 to the same values previously set > retitle 972870 RM: libhal1-flash -- RoQA; No longer maintained and replaced > by HTML5(DRM) Bug #972870 [ftp.debian.org] Should libhal1-flash be shipped in bullseye? Changed Bug title to 'RM: libhal1-flash -- RoQA; No longer maintained and replaced by HTML5(DRM)' from 'Should libhal1-flash be shipped in bullseye?'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 972870: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=972870 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#976586: boxbackup: FTBFS: latex undefined control sequence
Source: boxbackup
Version: 0.13~~git20200326.g8e8b63c-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on arm64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64).
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>/docs'
> [XLSTPROC] docbook/bb-book.xsl docbook/instguide.xml
> make[1]: Leaving directory '/<>/docs'
> cd docs/docbook && docbook2pdf instguide.xml
> Using catalogs: /etc/sgml/catalog
> Using stylesheet: /usr/share/docbook-utils/docbook-utils.dsl#print
> Working on: /<>/docs/docbook/instguide.xml
> This is pdfTeX, Version 3.14159265-2.6-1.40.21 (TeX Live 2020/Debian)
> (preloaded format=pdfjadetex)
> restricted \write18 enabled.
> entering extended mode
>
> (/<>/docs/docbook/inst
> guide.tex
> JadeTeX 2003/04/27: 3.13
> (/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/psnfss/t1ptm.fd)
> Elements will be labelled
> Jade begin document sequence at 20
> No file instguide.aux.
> (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/tipa/t3ptm.fd)
> (/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/psnfss/t1phv.fd)
> [1.0.32{/var/lib/texm
> f/fonts/map/pdftex/updmap/pdftex.map}] [2.0.32]
>
> Package Fancyhdr Warning: \fancyfoot's `E' option without twoside option is
> use
> less on input line 183.
>
> ! Undefined control sequence.
> \Hy@colorlink
>
> l.224 {0:2}}
> \Seq%
> ! Undefined control sequence.
> \close@pdflink ->\Hy@endcolorlink
> \Hy@VerboseLinkStop \pdfendlink
> l.228 ...-mode}}License\endNode{}\endSeq{}\endLink
> {}\Seq%
> ! Undefined control sequence.
> \Hy@colorlink
>
> l.232 {0:2}}
> \Seq%
>
> LaTeX Warning: Reference `0:2' on page iii undefined on input line 238.
>
> ! Undefined control sequence.
> \close@pdflink ->\Hy@endcolorlink
> \Hy@VerboseLinkStop \pdfendlink
> l.238 {0:2}}\endNode{}\endSeq{}\endLink
>{}\endSeq{}\endPar{}\Par%
> ! Undefined control sequence.
> \Hy@colorlink
>
> l.256 {0:17}}
> \Seq%
> ! Undefined control sequence.
> \close@pdflink ->\Hy@endcolorlink
> \Hy@VerboseLinkStop \pdfendlink
> l.262 ...}}Introduction\endNode{}\endSeq{}\endLink
> {}\Seq%
> ! Undefined control sequence.
> \Hy@colorlink
>
> l.266 {0:17}}
> \Seq%
>
> LaTeX Warning: Reference `0:17' on page iii undefined on input line 272.
>
> ! Undefined control sequence.
> \close@pdflink ->\Hy@endcolorlink
> \Hy@VerboseLinkStop \pdfendlink
> l.272 {0:17}}\endNode{}\endSeq{}\endLink
> {}\endSeq{}\endPar{}\Seq%
> ! Undefined control sequence.
> \Hy@colorlink
>
> l.282 {0:21}}
> \Seq%
> ! Undefined control sequence.
> \close@pdflink ->\Hy@endcolorlink
> \Hy@VerboseLinkStop \pdfendlink
> l.288 ...}Client daemon\endNode{}\endSeq{}\endLink
> {}\Seq%
> ! Undefined control sequence.
> \Hy@colorlink
>
> l.292 {0:21}}
> \Seq%
>
> LaTeX Warning: Reference `0:21' on page iii undefined on input line 298.
>
> ! Undefined control sequence.
> \close@pdflink ->\Hy@endcolorlink
> \Hy@VerboseLinkStop \pdfendlink
> l.298 {0:21}}\endNode{}\endSeq{}\endLink
> {}\endSeq{}\endPar{}\Seq%
> ! Undefined control sequence.
> \Hy@colorlink
>
> l.308 {0:29}}
> \Seq%
> ! Undefined control sequence.
> \close@pdflink ->\Hy@endcolorlink
> \Hy@VerboseLinkStop \pdfendlink
> l.314 ...e}}Restoration\endNode{}\endSeq{}\endLink
> {}\Seq%
> ! Undefined control sequence.
> \Hy@colorlink
>
> l.318 {0:29}}
> \Seq%
>
> LaTeX Warning: Reference `0:29' on page iii undefined on input line 324.
>
> ! Undefined control sequence.
> \close@pdflink ->\Hy@endcolorlink
> \Hy@VerboseLinkStop \pdfendlink
> l.324 {0:29}}\endNode{}\e
Processed: Reassign 976569
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 976569 libblosc1 1.20.1+ds1-1
Bug #976569 [src:numcodecs] numcodecs: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild
--test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.8 3.9" returned exit code 13
Bug reassigned from package 'src:numcodecs' to 'libblosc1'.
No longer marked as found in versions numcodecs/0.7.2+ds-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #976569 to the same values
previously set
Bug #976569 [libblosc1] numcodecs: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test
--test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.8 3.9" returned exit code 13
Marked as found in versions c-blosc/1.20.1+ds1-1.
> affects 976569 + numcodecs
Bug #976569 [libblosc1] numcodecs: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test
--test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.8 3.9" returned exit code 13
Added indication that 976569 affects numcodecs
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
976569: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=976569
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#976586: Bug#976495: also happens on amd64, should be worked around by 1.8.20-5 but the real fix will come with 1.8.20-6
[ Copying other bugs affected by new latex failures since my last rebuild ] Hi Paolo, On 05/12/20 at 18:55 +0100, Paolo Greppi wrote: > Hi Lucas (is it you, or a bot?), I'm not a bot, but only noticed this message by chance. Remember that bug submitters do not receive emails sent to nnn...@bugs.debian.org > thanks for the new bug report about doxygen 1.8.20-4 FTBFS on arm64: > https://bugs.debian.org/976495 > > I had noticed this issue yesterday and worked around it with 1.8.20-5 but the > real fix will come with 1.8.20-6, thanks to a tip from Norbert Preining: > https://bugs.debian.org/976405#10 > > It would be interesting to know when you last run the archive rebuild on > arm64 or amd64, because it's not clear since when this error happens. I last ran an archive rebuild on 24/11. Successful log for doxygen is at: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2020/12/05/tmp/doxygen_1.8.20-4_unstable.log There was a texlive update in the meantime. Here are the versions of packages that differ. < texlive-base_2020.20200925-1 --- > texlive-base_2020.20201203-2 438,446c434,442 < texlive-extra-utils_2020.20200925-1 < texlive-font-utils_2020.20200925-1 < texlive-fonts-recommended_2020.20200925-1 < texlive-latex-base_2020.20200925-1 < texlive-latex-extra_2020.20200925-1 < texlive-latex-recommended_2020.20200925-1 < texlive-luatex_2020.20200925-1 < texlive-pictures_2020.20200925-1 < texlive-plain-generic_2020.20200925-1 --- > texlive-extra-utils_2020.20201129-1 > texlive-font-utils_2020.20201129-1 > texlive-fonts-recommended_2020.20201203-2 > texlive-latex-base_2020.20201203-2 > texlive-latex-extra_2020.20201129-1 > texlive-latex-recommended_2020.20201203-2 > texlive-luatex_2020.20201203-2 > texlive-pictures_2020.20201203-2 > texlive-plain-generic_2020.20201129-1 Also, I noticed a few new latex-related failures in this archive rebuild. https://bugs.debian.org/976475 https://bugs.debian.org/976501 https://bugs.debian.org/976508 https://bugs.debian.org/976519 https://bugs.debian.org/976535 https://bugs.debian.org/976538 https://bugs.debian.org/976544 https://bugs.debian.org/976547 https://bugs.debian.org/976554 https://bugs.debian.org/976556 https://bugs.debian.org/976574 https://bugs.debian.org/976586 Lucas
Bug#976586: Bug#976405: Bug#976495: also happens on amd64, should be worked around by 1.8.20-5 but the real fix will come with 1.8.20-6
Hi thanks for the digging through the errors. > < texlive-base_2020.20200925-1 > --- > > texlive-base_2020.20201203-2 > Also, I noticed a few new latex-related failures in this archive rebuild. [...] It seems that something in the interface with hyperref has changed. Unfortunately the docbook/jadetex stuff is rather cryptic to deciper and hardly possible to get a *minimal* example. If someone can send me a minimal (as far as possible) input file, and the list of commands necessary to run (openjade/doxy/whatever) I can look into the old/new code and contact the upupstream authors. Best Norbert -- PREINING Norbert https://www.preining.info Accelia Inc. + IFMGA ProGuide + TU Wien + JAIST + TeX Live + Debian Dev GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13
Bug#976586: Bug#976535: Bug#976495: also happens on amd64, should be worked around by 1.8.20-5 but the real fix will come with 1.8.20-6
Lucas Nussbaum writes:
> There was a texlive update in the meantime. Here are the versions of
> packages that differ.
I explored this a bit today -- there's something quite amiss with the
docbook toolchain. I'm seeing a lot of this error:
! Undefined control sequence.
\close@pdflink ->\Hy@endcolorlink
\Hy@VerboseLinkStop \pdfendlink
l.585 ...-mode}}History\endNode{}\endSeq{}\endLink
{}\Seq%
The result is that pdfjadetex exits with status 1 and the resulting PDF
has a lot of artifacts in the TOC. Each TOC label and page number are
prefixed with 'black'.
I'd be happy to help fix things, but I'm afraid I'm way out of my
docbook depth here.
--
-keith
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
