Processed: Raising severity of apt-1.9.0 bugs to serious

2020-03-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> severity -1 serious
Bug #930663 [apt-move] apt-move: Port to apt 1.9
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'

-- 
930663: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=930663
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Processed: Raising severity of apt-1.9.0 bugs to serious

2020-03-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> severity -1 serious
Bug #931133 [apt-xapian-index] apt-xapian-index: unusable after recent 
python-apt update due to usage of deprecated Package.section attribute
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'

-- 
931133: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=931133
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#930663: Raising severity of apt-1.9.0 bugs to serious

2020-03-07 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Control: severity -1 serious

We're about to start the APT transition, which means failure to
build against the new apt is becoming a serious issue.

Of the bugs this email is sent to, openscap requires further work,
see the diff:

https://launchpadlibrarian.net/466833401/openscap_1.2.16-2ubuntu2_1.2.16-2ubuntu3.diff.gz


apt-xapian-index, apt-move, and kthresher should not require any
additional work over that given in the original bug report.

To test the changes, you can build against apt 1.9.12 in experimental,
or for Python scripts, test with python-apt 1.9.8 from experimental.

If the changes don't make it in before the transition starts, I'll
upload NMUs to take care of it.

-- 
debian developer - deb.li/jak | jak-linux.org - free software dev
ubuntu core developer  i speak de, en



Processed: tagging 953243, tagging 930663, tagging 930673, tagging 931133, found 953308 in 3.0.4-1 ...

2020-03-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 953243 + sid bullseye
Bug #953243 [ssh-import-id] ssh-import-id: Fails with Python 3.8
Added tag(s) sid and bullseye.
> tags 930663 + sid bullseye
Bug #930663 [apt-move] apt-move: Port to apt 1.9
Added tag(s) bullseye and sid.
> tags 930673 + sid bullseye
Bug #930673 [openscap] openscap: Port to apt 1.9.0
Added tag(s) bullseye and sid.
> tags 931133 + sid bullseye
Bug #931133 [apt-xapian-index] apt-xapian-index: unusable after recent 
python-apt update due to usage of deprecated Package.section attribute
Added tag(s) sid and bullseye.
> found 953308 3.0.4-1
Bug #953308 [src:libqapt] libqapt: Port to apt 1.9.0 and apt 1.9.11 changes
Marked as found in versions libqapt/3.0.4-1.
> tags 953308 + sid bullseye
Bug #953308 [src:libqapt] libqapt: Port to apt 1.9.0 and apt 1.9.11 changes
Added tag(s) sid and bullseye.
> found 953311 0.90
Bug #953311 [synaptic] synaptic: Port to apt 1.9.11
Marked as found in versions synaptic/0.90.
> notfound 953311 0.84.6ubuntu3
Bug #953311 [synaptic] synaptic: Port to apt 1.9.11
There is no source info for the package 'synaptic' at version '0.84.6ubuntu3' 
with architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '0.84.6ubuntu3'
No longer marked as found in versions 0.84.6ubuntu3.
> fixed 953215 8.0-3
Bug #953215 [libreadline-dev] [libreadline-dev] libreadline-dev in stable lacks 
a .pc file for pkg-config
Marked as fixed in versions readline/8.0-3.
> notfound 953215 7.0.5
Bug #953215 [libreadline-dev] [libreadline-dev] libreadline-dev in stable lacks 
a .pc file for pkg-config
There is no source info for the package 'libreadline-dev' at version '7.0.5' 
with architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '7.0.5'
No longer marked as found in versions 7.0.5.
> found 953215 7.0-3
Bug #953215 [libreadline-dev] [libreadline-dev] libreadline-dev in stable lacks 
a .pc file for pkg-config
Marked as found in versions readline/7.0-3.
> severity 953215 important
Bug #953215 [libreadline-dev] [libreadline-dev] libreadline-dev in stable lacks 
a .pc file for pkg-config
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
930663: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=930663
930673: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=930673
931133: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=931133
953215: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=953215
953243: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=953243
953308: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=953308
953311: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=953311
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#168573: marked as done (sgmltools-lite: Docbook Style Sheet for HTML not found)

2020-03-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 07 Mar 2020 23:21:11 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#947027: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #168573,
regarding sgmltools-lite: Docbook Style Sheet for HTML not found
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
168573: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=168573
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sgmltools-lite
Version: 3.0.3.0.cvs.20010909-12
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable

I must say first that I installed most of the SGML tools I was
able to found using apt-cache search ; but I didn't hack
anything in standard files before I got this problem.

After typing
$ sgmltools --backend=onehtml organisation.sgml

I go this error message :
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/sgmltools", line 93, in ?
tool.processFile(curfile)
  File "/usr/share/sgml/misc/sgmltools/python/SGMLtools.py", line 235, in 
processFile
dssslfile = utils.findStylesheet(stylesheet, self._aliases)
  File "/usr/share/sgml/misc/sgmltools/python/utils.py", line 307, in 
findStylesheet
return findStylesheet(name, aliases)
  File "/usr/share/sgml/misc/sgmltools/python/utils.py", line 317, in 
findStylesheet
raise IOError, "Couldn't resolve pubid [%s]" % id
IOError: Couldn't resolve pubid ["-//SGMLtools//DOCUMENT Docbook Style Sheet 
for HTML//EN"]

(BTW, my SGML file validate properly against "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook V3.1//EN")

I found a similar problem report here :
http://www.lug-bs.de/lug/linuxtage/blt_2/cd_online/doc/LDP/archives/ldp-discuss/msg01901.html

And followed all its advices, without much luck.

Finally, I was able to resolve this by defining an environment variable :
export 
SGML_CATALOG_FILES=/usr/lib/sgml/catalog:/usr/share/sgml/stylesheet/dsssl/sgmltools/sgmltools.cat

I am in no position to appreciate this situation, but I have the feeling
that it's not the better fix one can imagine ; using aliases or catalog
files would probably be cleaner, but using update-catalog as an example
I wasn't able to get any result.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux mica 2.4.18 #2 dim nov 3 21:31:12 CET 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=fr_FR, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR

Versions of packages sgmltools-lite depends on:
ii  docbook   4.2-1  SGML DTD for authors of technical 
ii  docbook-dsssl 1.77-1 Modular DocBook DSSSL stylesheets,
ii  jade  1.2.1-28   James Clark's DSSSL Engine
ii  python2.2.2-1An interactive object-oriented scr
ii  sgml-base 1.17   utilities to maintain SGML catalog

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 3.0.3.0.cvs.20010909-20+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package sgmltools-lite has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/947027

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---


Bug#106028: marked as done (sgmltools-2: cannot use nochunks)

2020-03-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 07 Mar 2020 23:21:11 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#947027: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #106028,
regarding sgmltools-2: cannot use nochunks
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
106028: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=106028
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sgmltools-2
Version: 2.0.2-4
Severity: normal


When using nochunks in style sheet, sgmltools returns :

$ sgmltools -d -v -b html -s bootdisk.dsl bootdisk.sgml
+mkdir /tmp/@5211
+chdir /tmp/@5211
+/usr/bin/jade -t sgml -d bootdisk.dsl -o /tmp/@5211.2 >/tmp/@5211.3
+chdir /home/mic/projets/bootdisk/docs/fr
+rm -rf './bootdisk'
+mkdir ./bootdisk
+mv /tmp/@5211/* ./bootdisk
mv: cannot stat `/tmp/@5211/*': No such file or directory
+rmdir /tmp/@5211
+chdir ./bootdisk
+chdir /home/mic/projets/bootdisk/docs/fr

'/usr/bin/jade -t sgml -d bootdisk.dsl -o test < bootdisk.sgml' is echoing on 
stdout
So output file is put in stdout (in /tmp/@5211.3) and thus /tmp/@5211 is empty.

-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Kernel Version: Linux cholera 2.4.3 #2 Mon Jul 9 20:35:52 CEST 2001 i686 unknown

Versions of the packages sgmltools-2 depends on:
ii  docbook3.1-2  SGML DTD for software documentation
ii  docbook-styles 1.49-1 Modular DocBook stylesheets, for print and H
ii  python-base1.5.2-10potato An interactive object-oriented scripting lan
ii  sgml-base  1.01   utilities to maintain the SGML catalog file

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 3.0.3.0.cvs.20010909-20+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package sgmltools-lite has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/947027

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---


Bug#871760: marked as done (sgmltools-lite: please transition from jadetex to texlive-formats-extra)

2020-03-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 07 Mar 2020 23:21:11 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#947027: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #871752,
regarding sgmltools-lite: please transition from jadetex to 
texlive-formats-extra
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
871752: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=871752
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sgmltools-lite
Version: 3.0.3.0.cvs.20010909-20
Severity: normal

Dear maintainer,

your package sgmltools-lite declares a relation onto
jadetex
which has been a transitional package for one and a half years
by now. 

Please update your package dependencies to use the correct
texlive-formats-extra

We will remove `jadetex' in the near future, but will continue
providing it from texlive-formats-extra for some more time

Thanks for your cooperation

Norbert

---
PREINING Norbert   http://www.preining.info
Accelia Inc. +JAIST +TeX Live +Debian Developer
GPG: 0x860CDC13   fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 3.0.3.0.cvs.20010909-20+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package sgmltools-lite has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/947027

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---


Bug#871752: marked as done (sgmltools-lite: please transition from jadetex to texlive-formats-extra)

2020-03-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 07 Mar 2020 23:21:11 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#947027: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #871752,
regarding sgmltools-lite: please transition from jadetex to 
texlive-formats-extra
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
871752: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=871752
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sgmltools-lite
Version: 3.0.3.0.cvs.20010909-20
Severity: normal

Dear maintainer,

your package sgmltools-lite declares a relation onto
jadetex
which has been a transitional package for one and a half years
by now. 

Please update your package dependencies to use the correct
texlive-formats-extra

We will remove `jadetex' in the near future, but will continue
providing it from texlive-formats-extra for some more time

Thanks for your cooperation

Norbert

---
PREINING Norbert   http://www.preining.info
Accelia Inc. +JAIST +TeX Live +Debian Developer
GPG: 0x860CDC13   fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 3.0.3.0.cvs.20010909-20+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package sgmltools-lite has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/947027

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---


Bug#64334: marked as done (Interpretation of postscript output fails when GIF images are included)

2020-03-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 07 Mar 2020 23:21:11 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#947027: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #64334,
regarding Interpretation of postscript output fails when GIF images are included
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
64334: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=64334
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sgmltools-2
Version: 2.0.2-4

The following docbook chapter, when run through
sgmltools -b ps

then generates a postscript file that returns an error when processed
with gs (e.g. viewed with gv or run through ps2pdf).



Tickle the GIF bug in ps output





Any GIF will do.

The error it generates is this:
Error: /undefined in GIF89að
Operand stack:

Execution stack:
   %interp_exit   .runexec2   --nostringval--   --nostringval--  
--nostringval--   2   %stopped_push   --nostringval--   2   3  
%oparray_pop   --nostringval--   --nostringval--   false   1  
%stopped_push   1   3   %oparray_pop   1   3   %oparray_pop  
.runexec2   --nostringval--   --nostringval--   --nostringval--   2  
%stopped_push   --nostringval--   --nostringval--   --nostringval--  
5   5   %oparray_pop
Dictionary stack:
   --dict:778/809--   --dict:0/20--   --dict:55/200--  
--dict:208/300--   --dict:42/200--
Current allocation mode is local
Current file position is 863961

I'm not sure where this happens in the chain - if it's sgmltools-2,
docbook-stylesheets, jade, jadetex, gs, or what. 

Really need PNG support IMHO.

Thanks-

-- 

Paul Reavis  prea...@partnersoft.com
Design Lead
Partner Software, Inc.http://www.partnersoft.com

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 3.0.3.0.cvs.20010909-20+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package sgmltools-lite has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/947027

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---


Bug#380949: marked as done (Python transition (#2): you are building a private python module !)

2020-03-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 07 Mar 2020 23:21:11 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#947027: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #380949,
regarding Python transition (#2): you are building a private python module !
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
380949: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=380949
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sgmltools-lite
Version: 3.0.3.0.cvs.20010909-13
Severity: important

  Hi, your package has been detected as generating a (for most of that
mass bug fill: private) python module/extension that may need an upgrade
to the new Python Policy[1].

  A wiki page[2] explains what has to be done to upgrade your packages
to the new Policy. This bug may be a false positive, in that case,
please just close the bug.

  This bug is part of a mass bug filling, and its severity will be
raised to serious when python will default to python2.4 (which should
happend on tomorrow - Wed 2nd of July). Please note that this bug (even
not being RC) falls under the 0-day NMU policy.


  [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/06/msg9.html
  [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianPython/NewPolicy
  especially "Notes for packages with private modules/extensions"


Special Notes

  * embedded interpreters: You don't *need* to do anything for your
package, though using XS/XB-Python-Version is much appreciated as it
helps tracking your package for binNMUs when python2.4 will become
default.

  * if you need help updating your package, you can either:
 - mail debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org ,
 - tag your bug + help ,
 - come on #debian-python/OFTC.


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 3.0.3.0.cvs.20010909-20+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package sgmltools-lite has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/947027

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---


Bug#191881: marked as done (sgmltools-lite: sgmltools --backend html fails with openjade)

2020-03-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 07 Mar 2020 23:21:11 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#947027: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #191881,
regarding sgmltools-lite: sgmltools --backend html  fails with openjade
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
191881: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=191881
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sgmltools-lite
Version: 3.0.3.0.cvs.20010909-12
Severity: normal

When I try to build newt with openjade installed instead of jade I get
the errors below. I believe sgmltools is to blame:

==
mrvn@dual:/tmp/newt/newt-0.51.4-mrvn% sgmltools -v --backend html tutorial.sgml
/usr/bin/openjade:/usr/share/sgml/stylesheet/dsssl/sgmltools/html.dsl:24:73:W: 
cannot generate system identifier for public text "-//James Clark//DTD DSSSL 
Style Sheet//EN"
/usr/bin/openjade:/usr/share/sgml/stylesheet/dsssl/sgmltools/html.dsl:26:0:E: 
reference to entity "STYLE-SHEET" for which no system identifier could be 
generated
/usr/bin/openjade:/usr/share/sgml/stylesheet/dsssl/sgmltools/html.dsl:24:0: 
entity was defined here
/usr/bin/openjade:/usr/share/sgml/stylesheet/dsssl/sgmltools/html.dsl:26:0:E: 
DTD did not contain element declaration for document type name
/usr/bin/openjade:/usr/share/sgml/stylesheet/dsssl/sgmltools/html.dsl:25:0:E: 
notation "DSSSL" for entity "docbook.dsl" undefined
/usr/bin/openjade:/usr/share/sgml/stylesheet/dsssl/sgmltools/html.dsl:27:12:E: 
element "STYLE-SHEET" undefined
/usr/bin/openjade:/usr/share/sgml/stylesheet/dsssl/sgmltools/html.dsl:29:24:E: 
there is no attribute "ID"
/usr/bin/openjade:/usr/share/sgml/stylesheet/dsssl/sgmltools/html.dsl:29:35:E: 
there is no attribute "USE"
/usr/bin/openjade:/usr/share/sgml/stylesheet/dsssl/sgmltools/html.dsl:29:44:E: 
element "STYLE-SPECIFICATION" undefined
/usr/bin/openjade:/usr/share/sgml/stylesheet/dsssl/sgmltools/html.dsl:30:25:E: 
element "STYLE-SPECIFICATION-BODY" undefined
/usr/bin/openjade:/usr/share/sgml/stylesheet/dsssl/sgmltools/html.dsl:46:44:E: 
element "STYLE-SPECIFICATION" undefined
/usr/bin/openjade:/usr/share/sgml/stylesheet/dsssl/sgmltools/html.dsl:47:25:E: 
element "STYLE-SPECIFICATION-BODY" undefined
/usr/bin/openjade:/usr/share/sgml/stylesheet/dsssl/sgmltools/html.dsl:55:42:E: 
element "STYLE-SPECIFICATION" undefined
/usr/bin/openjade:/usr/share/sgml/stylesheet/dsssl/sgmltools/html.dsl:56:25:E: 
element "STYLE-SPECIFICATION-BODY" undefined
/usr/bin/openjade:/usr/share/sgml/stylesheet/dsssl/sgmltools/html.dsl:65:27:E: 
there is no attribute "ID"
/usr/bin/openjade:/usr/share/sgml/stylesheet/dsssl/sgmltools/html.dsl:65:46:E: 
there is no attribute "DOCUMENT"
/usr/bin/openjade:/usr/share/sgml/stylesheet/dsssl/sgmltools/html.dsl:65:59:E: 
element "EXTERNAL-SPECIFICATION" undefined
/usr/bin/openjade:E: specification document does not have the DSSSL 
architecture as a base architecture
/usr/bin/openjade:E: no style-specification or external-specification with ID 
"HTML"
+mkdir /tmp/@14531
+chdir /tmp/@14531
+/usr/share/sgmltools-lite/jadewhich -t sgml -d 
/usr/share/sgml/stylesheet/dsssl/sgmltools/html.dsl#html -o /tmp/@14531.2 
/tmp/@14531.1  >/tmp/@14531.3
+/usr/share/sgmltools-lite/jadewhich -t sgml -d 
/usr/share/sgml/stylesheet/dsssl/sgmltools/html.dsl#html -o /tmp/@14531.2 
/tmp/@14531.1  >/tmp/@14531.3
+chdir /tmp/newt/newt-0.51.4-mrvn
+rm -rf ./tutorial/*
warning: the output directory is empty
maybe you should use "-b onehtml" instead of "-b html"
+rmdir /tmp/@14531
+chdir ./tutorial
+chdir /tmp/newt/newt-0.51.4-mrvn
==

MfG
Goswin

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux dual 2.4.20-ac2-dual #1 SMP Tue Apr 15 15:36:20 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE

Versions of packages sgmltools-lite depends on:
ii  docbook4.2-3 standard SGML representation syste
ii  docbook-dsssl  1.78-3modular DocBook DSSSL stylesheets,
ii  openjade   1.4devel1-8.3 Implementation of the DSSSL langua
ii  python 2.2.2-6   An interactive object-oriented scr
ii  sgml-base  1.17  utilities to maintain SGML catalog

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 3.0.3.0.cvs.20010909-20+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package sgmltools-lite has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we here

Bug#94649: marked as done (sgmltools-lite doesn't move tmp with custom stylesheet)

2020-03-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 07 Mar 2020 23:21:11 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#947027: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #94649,
regarding sgmltools-lite doesn't move tmp with custom stylesheet
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
94649: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=94649
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Package: sgmltools-lite 
Version: 3.0.2.3

I got this package from:
http://people.debian.org/~sano/sgmltools-lite/

When I pass sgmltools-lite another stylesheet with the -s option it does not 
create any output.  It does create the named subdirectory where 
sgmltools-lite is executed but it is empty.

Here's what it looks like when I invoke it:
jesse@storm:~/test$ sgmltools -b html -s \
/usr/lib/sgml/stylesheet/dsssl/docbook/ldp/ldp.dsl kernel-pkg.en.sgml
mv: /tmp/@4633/*: No such file or directory

(That's manually folded, I used \ to denote that, this should only be two 
lines)

The temp directory is being created, here it is in another terminal:
jesse@storm:/tmp$ ls
@4633  lost+found  ssh-jiTn3664  ssh-oqbn4415
@4633.3

I tried using the debug option.  The temp directory is created and retained 
but it is empty.

Nothing is reported to /var/log/syslog. 
Nothing is reported to /var/log/messages.

I was able to use this stylesheet with the original sgmltools (not 
sgmltools-2 which also had this problem).

If there is something else I can try to hunt this down please let me know.

Jesse
- -- 
Docs by & for Debian newbies
http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net
pgp key at:
http://personal.mco.bellsouth.net/~jgoerz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAjrggBUACgkQUraCO4ktIFeUqwCfSLf9r0h7U2oz/6e3HbRPdr3U
QPUAn2heictHdXbSqUNWXACjhzVKYPEI
=76e+
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 3.0.3.0.cvs.20010909-20+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package sgmltools-lite has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/947027

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---


Bug#938473: marked as done (sgmltools-lite: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye)

2020-03-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 07 Mar 2020 23:21:11 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#947027: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #938473,
regarding sgmltools-lite: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
938473: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=938473
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: src:sgmltools-lite
Version: 3.0.3.0.cvs.20010909-20
Severity: normal
Tags: sid bullseye
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: py2removal

Python2 becomes end-of-live upstream, and Debian aims to remove
Python2 from the distribution, as discussed in
https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2019/07/msg00080.html

Your package either build-depends, depends on Python2, or uses Python2
in the autopkg tests.  Please stop using Python2, and fix this issue
by one of the following actions.

- Convert your Package to Python3. This is the preferred option.  In
  case you are providing a Python module foo, please consider dropping
  the python-foo package, and only build a python3-foo package.  Please
  don't drop Python2 modules, which still have reverse dependencies,
  just document them.
  
  This is the preferred option.

- If the package is dead upstream, cannot be converted or maintained
  in Debian, it should be removed from the distribution.  If the
  package still has reverse dependencies, raise the severity to
  "serious" and document the reverse dependencies with the BTS affects
  command.  If the package has no reverse dependencies, confirm that
  the package can be removed, reassign this issue to ftp.debian.org,
  make sure that the bug priority is set to normal and retitle the
  issue to "RM: PKG -- removal triggered by the Python2 removal".

- If the package has still many users (popcon >= 300), or is needed to
  build another package which cannot be removed, document that by
  adding the "py2keep" user tag (not replacing the py2remove tag),
  using the debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org user.  Also any
  dependencies on an unversioned python package (python, python-dev)
  must not be used, same with the python shebang.  These have to be
  replaced by python2/python2.7 dependencies and shebang.

  This is the least preferred option.

If the conversion or removal needs action on another package first,
please document the blocking by using the BTS affects command, like

  affects  + src:sgmltools-lite

If there is no py2removal bug for that reverse-dependency, please file
a bug on this package (similar to this bug report).

If there are questions, please refer to the wiki page for the removal:
https://wiki.debian.org/Python/2Removal, or ask for help on IRC
#debian-python, or the debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org mailing list.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 3.0.3.0.cvs.20010909-20+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package sgmltools-lite has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/947027

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---


Bug#947027: Removed package(s) from unstable

2020-03-07 Thread Debian FTP Masters
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

sgmltools-lite | 3.0.3.0.cvs.20010909-20 | source, all

--- Reason ---
RoQA: sgmltools-lite, py2, superceded by docbook-utils
--

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next
dinstall run at the earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package
automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed
correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 947...@bugs.debian.org.

The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/947027

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)



Processing of sendmail_8.15.2-18_source.changes

2020-03-07 Thread Debian FTP Masters
sendmail_8.15.2-18_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  sendmail_8.15.2-18.dsc
  sendmail_8.15.2-18.debian.tar.xz
  sendmail_8.15.2-18_source.buildinfo

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)



sendmail_8.15.2-18_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2020-03-07 Thread Debian FTP Masters



Accepted:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2020 00:39:49 +0100
Source: sendmail
Architecture: source
Version: 8.15.2-18
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group 
Changed-By: Andreas Beckmann 
Changes:
 sendmail (8.15.2-18) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * QA upload.
 .
   [ Logan Rosen ]
   * d/p/glibc-2.30.patch: Import patch from openSUSE to fix FTBFS with glibc
 2.30.
Checksums-Sha1:
 721919acef237f9f6a934f740c7f2e3c6c4ec872 2820 sendmail_8.15.2-18.dsc
 19c9373ca4e39c8c96c771ad0e093965e3224e35 309316 
sendmail_8.15.2-18.debian.tar.xz
 d80744d4fde8103a82ffa5299a6e61ddfeca055b 6077 
sendmail_8.15.2-18_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 81d9d2282f8fa3510728dc6bac7cbc7c2a2eb8b83de1cb35ba2935ceb2731a7e 2820 
sendmail_8.15.2-18.dsc
 db8d25744cae3f2e55dac3eec16dd32641a2bd09541892a7e50c3e69b4c84086 309316 
sendmail_8.15.2-18.debian.tar.xz
 6255fef5383381641c49c4178f400db7e32645f4f64dfb94f0fe68a0c88e3376 6077 
sendmail_8.15.2-18_source.buildinfo
Files:
 1d2664e259bd1cfb37f542a8fd1bc55b 2820 mail optional sendmail_8.15.2-18.dsc
 b2dbf8cfc380df8b445de6c8d6bc5a25 309316 mail optional 
sendmail_8.15.2-18.debian.tar.xz
 51b9aaabd660219a87ae8e9783eac04b 6077 mail optional 
sendmail_8.15.2-18_source.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iQJEBAEBCAAuFiEE6/MKMKjZxjvaRMaUX7M/k1np7QgFAl5kM3cQHGFuYmVAZGVi
aWFuLm9yZwAKCRBfsz+TWentCJJJD/9cORCL0PnKIebFFV+IUcm6/NY+EpYn2tlg
GaCwQjbWpYb0gUD3Ez9ZzbjXdMjq45hydgxznkAyCS14KEzMTMtqZBUikTwlCb8t
tPVaiiBrmqe5gDun9V+A9XjpzvQcfdJRydsSu5QJNfDyZyYK8gqTpHo1wv6QV5Jw
a3HQbd4Qgo0CwycBP9t3vFGEtYhfntjTP+XDUSQxPm/fAAQOg5S7Lv5pRmJfiY1P
k/B5e/S7SbXOlejUBeDm7kQeAqi3BGfjYQe2ihh4t9wBhu8rbdZymf37FWxhAFF8
x1fQLjoxbenvsr2/Lpr71FAs+Z1ShSYAMn0UCiiAYll8jKJGpHzCyfIFvGkk1n9K
NsIZo6EoKNEEv/6iIONncH7xztfOyMUQCVzD4Vnt9Y/MVfQXwtjMkj3PapZpPWg1
6+MOZiPlnR0U4dJhM5etODK6clLWSiJrg3eioz+RXGajvtoOEFm0bnciZpH6mOh9
wSfhO77Rh+cfNVXt3h+Chado0e2rkB8swXnQSgvzU0elJv6jZ59sBIbsJ06CjiRI
tSD9nxE1kywrgwtuPYqDE1URmlPgP79gimHNJ83DYGISPasZInbG9dcFA1X4smIq
B+6SCX5MZYInJa8zF9DAo3Y+BjrLkFLqyQ/5xLxPCvEpAHxKQWHHONK1ULBdHvSR
grhzfY3+Rw==
=3aFo
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.



Processing of c-icap-modules_0.5.4-1_source.changes

2020-03-07 Thread Debian FTP Masters
c-icap-modules_0.5.4-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  c-icap-modules_0.5.4-1.dsc
  c-icap-modules_0.5.4.orig.tar.gz
  c-icap-modules_0.5.4-1.debian.tar.xz
  c-icap-modules_0.5.4-1_source.buildinfo

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)



Bug#952009: marked as done (c-icap-modules: FTBFS: clamav_mod.c:108:13: error: expected identifier or ‘(’ before string constant)

2020-03-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 08 Mar 2020 00:34:21 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#952009: fixed in c-icap-modules 1:0.5.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #952009,
regarding c-icap-modules: FTBFS: clamav_mod.c:108:13: error: expected 
identifier or ‘(’ before string constant
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
952009: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=952009
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: c-icap-modules
Version: 1:0.5.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-buster

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.

Relevant part (hopefully):
> /bin/bash ../../libtool  --tag=CC   --mode=link gcc  -g -O2 
> -fdebug-prefix-map=/<>=. -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat 
> -Werror=format-security -Wall -fvisibility=hidden -DCI_BUILD_MODULE 
> -D_REENTRANT -g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/build/c-icap-FHVm1G/c-icap-0.5.3=. 
> -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wall -Wall 
> -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I/usr/include -I/usr/include/c_icap -module 
> -avoid-version -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now -o clamd_mod.la -rpath 
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/c_icap/ clamd_mod_la-clamd_mod.lo  
> libtool: link: gcc -shared  -fPIC -DPIC  .libs/clamd_mod_la-clamd_mod.o-g 
> -O2 -fstack-protector-strong -g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong -Wl,-z -Wl,relro 
> -Wl,-z -Wl,now   -Wl,-soname -Wl,clamd_mod.so -o .libs/clamd_mod.so
> In file included from /usr/include/clamav.h:69,
>  from clamav_mod.c:27:
> clamav_mod.c:108:13: error: expected identifier or ‘(’ before string constant
>   108 | static char CLAMAV_VERSION[CLAMAV_VERSION_SIZE];
>   | ^~
> clamav_mod.c: In function ‘clamav_set_versions’:
> clamav_mod.c:645:6: warning: assignment of read-only location ‘"0.102.2"[63]’
>   645 |  CLAMAV_VERSION[CLAMAV_VERSION_SIZE - 1] = '\0';
>   |  ^~
> make[4]: *** [Makefile:512: clamav_mod_la-clamav_mod.lo] Error 1

The full build log is available from:
   http://qa-logs.debian.net/2020/02/22/c-icap-modules_0.5.3-2_unstable.log

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: c-icap-modules
Source-Version: 1:0.5.4-1
Done: =?utf-8?q?H=C3=A5vard_Flaget_Aasen?= 

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
c-icap-modules, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 952...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Håvard Flaget Aasen  (supplier of updated 
c-icap-modules package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2020 15:59:45 +0100
Source: c-icap-modules
Architecture: source
Version: 1:0.5.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group 
Changed-By: Håvard Flaget Aasen 
Closes: 952009
Changes:
 c-icap-modules (1:0.5.4-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * QA upload.
   [ Debian Janitor ]
   * Bump debhelper from old 11 to 12.
   * Set debhelper-compat version in Build-Depends.
 .
   [ Håvard Flaget Aasen ]
   * New upstream version 0.5.4
 fix in upstream version closes: #952009
   * Update Standards-Version to 4.5.0
   * Remove libltdl3-dev as build-dependency
   * Disable autopkgtest which needs internet access
   * d/tests/toolbox.sh, add sleep before reading pid file
Checksums-Sha1:
 4739fea338e24251283ba1ea0bd2950b4aff4058 2167 c-icap-modules_0.5.4-1.dsc
 ec7bb138d7775895cd8b2e12adc41dbf48eba1b7 450411 
c-icap-modules_0.5.4.orig.tar.gz
 9be737a527b672ed02d6990826b0c4aa4c6f8ecb 6004 
c-icap-modules_0.5.4-1.debian.tar.xz
 4cf2348b748eb42d7f879d25941d904d18eb96f1 6615 
c-icap-modules_0.5.4-1_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 b486f19689067e3d575421450be71bfcedd6a7ff80a219afc

c-icap-modules_0.5.4-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2020-03-07 Thread Debian FTP Masters



Accepted:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2020 15:59:45 +0100
Source: c-icap-modules
Architecture: source
Version: 1:0.5.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group 
Changed-By: Håvard Flaget Aasen 
Closes: 952009
Changes:
 c-icap-modules (1:0.5.4-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * QA upload.
   [ Debian Janitor ]
   * Bump debhelper from old 11 to 12.
   * Set debhelper-compat version in Build-Depends.
 .
   [ Håvard Flaget Aasen ]
   * New upstream version 0.5.4
 fix in upstream version closes: #952009
   * Update Standards-Version to 4.5.0
   * Remove libltdl3-dev as build-dependency
   * Disable autopkgtest which needs internet access
   * d/tests/toolbox.sh, add sleep before reading pid file
Checksums-Sha1:
 4739fea338e24251283ba1ea0bd2950b4aff4058 2167 c-icap-modules_0.5.4-1.dsc
 ec7bb138d7775895cd8b2e12adc41dbf48eba1b7 450411 
c-icap-modules_0.5.4.orig.tar.gz
 9be737a527b672ed02d6990826b0c4aa4c6f8ecb 6004 
c-icap-modules_0.5.4-1.debian.tar.xz
 4cf2348b748eb42d7f879d25941d904d18eb96f1 6615 
c-icap-modules_0.5.4-1_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 b486f19689067e3d575421450be71bfcedd6a7ff80a219afc0aae088d54bbab8 2167 
c-icap-modules_0.5.4-1.dsc
 87409920c66027204e9cca5f20e137b63cd12daf6dfcd85c1fa62ab2bd1c57cc 450411 
c-icap-modules_0.5.4.orig.tar.gz
 f1bae239b792aa1666e428a4c08862c7f11bf0a738946a92d8a8d65d195a5603 6004 
c-icap-modules_0.5.4-1.debian.tar.xz
 883edea900072db2f3a58fbabdfa238d5cfd1acca5c62d6163cd636337c8247a 6615 
c-icap-modules_0.5.4-1_source.buildinfo
Files:
 86f69522887b020081711e536908ae4b 2167 net optional c-icap-modules_0.5.4-1.dsc
 2f8c174f7a5414616f5a0a976ac4a221 450411 net optional 
c-icap-modules_0.5.4.orig.tar.gz
 283b182c56c6c7c0f8404c8f0372405a 6004 net optional 
c-icap-modules_0.5.4-1.debian.tar.xz
 8b152f9b5f5e5b4a51b70b3228a1cfe5 6615 net optional 
c-icap-modules_0.5.4-1_source.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=aiOI
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.



Processing of libopendbx_1.4.6-14_source.changes

2020-03-07 Thread Debian FTP Masters
libopendbx_1.4.6-14_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  libopendbx_1.4.6-14.dsc
  libopendbx_1.4.6-14.debian.tar.xz
  libopendbx_1.4.6-14_source.buildinfo

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)



Bug#947578: marked as done (FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1)

2020-03-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 08 Mar 2020 01:19:47 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#947578: fixed in rafkill 1.2.2-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #947578,
regarding FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
947578: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947578
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: rafkill
Version: 1.2.2-6
Severity: important
Usertags: scons_ftbfs


Hello, 

in the context of the change to Python3 also Scons was revised. With
the current version 3.1.2-1 from Experimental the changeover is
finished so far. 

However, an error occurred while building your package. The build log
is attached.

Please check it and fix the error.

CU
Jörg

-- 
New:
GPG Fingerprint: 63E0 075F C8D4 3ABB 35AB  30EE 09F8 9F3C 8CA1 D25D
GPG key (long) : 09F89F3C8CA1D25D
GPG Key: 8CA1D25D
CAcert Key S/N : 0E:D4:56

Old pgp Key: BE581B6E (revoked since 2014-12-31).

Jörg Frings-Fürst
D-54470 Lieser


git:  https://jff.email/cgit/

Threema:  SYR8SJXB
Wire: @joergfringsfuerst
Skype:joergpenguin
Ring: jff
Telegram: @joergfringsfuerst


My wish list: 
 - Please send me a picture from the nature at your home.

dh clean
   dh_auto_clean
make -j1 clean
make[1]: Entering directory 
'/data/entwicklung/linux/debian/trans_scons/rafkill-1.2.2'
scons -c
scons: Reading SConscript files ...
Use 'scons -h' for help
NameError: name 'Options' is not defined:
  File "/data/entwicklung/linux/debian/trans_scons/rafkill-1.2.2/SConstruct", 
line 22:
opts = Options( 'rafkill.conf' )
make[1]: *** [Makefile:8: clean] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory 
'/data/entwicklung/linux/debian/trans_scons/rafkill-1.2.2'
dh_auto_clean: make -j1 clean returned exit code 2
make: *** [debian/rules:4: clean] Error 255


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: rafkill
Source-Version: 1.2.2-7
Done: =?utf-8?q?H=C3=A5vard_Flaget_Aasen?= 

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
rafkill, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 947...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Håvard Flaget Aasen  (supplier of updated rafkill 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2020 21:19:37 +0100
Source: rafkill
Architecture: source
Version: 1.2.2-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group 
Changed-By: Håvard Flaget Aasen 
Closes: 947578
Changes:
 rafkill (1.2.2-7) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * QA upload.
   * d/control
 - Update Standards-Version to 4.5.0
 - Change to debhelper-compat
 - Bump debhelper to 12
 - Remove outdated Vcs-* fields
 - Wrap and sort build-dependencies
 - Remove duplicated section field
 - Add Rules-Requires-Root: no
   * d/copyright
 - Use secure URI
   * Add 106_scons_python3_patch closes: # 947578
Checksums-Sha1:
 110cdd7051e6c7913c43946348c1ab47f183db9f 1815 rafkill_1.2.2-7.dsc
 81caa834a7e4e2ca80d2902c5fb4fe3b4b8939ed 11912 rafkill_1.2.2-7.debian.tar.xz
 16546735dc624d98c028d290c145a78e0d3022c2 6878 rafkill_1.2.2-7_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 4905ad1a8a48dbba9daf718bdd6d9925df6e643205b57361165afb0c08c935b2 1815 
rafkill_1.2.2-7.dsc
 f367f0f4f54f31e989e373b892449a7f7b8800c21e0503439aaec88058b3d431 11912 
rafkill_1.2.2-7.debian.tar.xz
 8731ecc4b2cc026eaa42f6e94af7e9ab7b477c9f125483e25b2842de96084f5e 6878 
rafkill_1.2.2-7_source.buildinfo
Files:
 eec4ad1ce2cc0f2cd81dd901826de574 1815 games optional rafkill_1.2.2-7.dsc
 87d58d09dcd6c52a2b0985c353cb4ddd 11912 games optional 
rafkill_1.2.2-7.debian.tar.xz
 bd522b0b0a7fdc2a308447822417c6f2 6878 games optional 
rafkill_1.2.2-7_source.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEkjZVexcMh/iCHArDweDZLphvfH4FAl5kQ0gACgkQweDZLphv
fH4zqxAAul+OY0jVCmfuNOHtYzDUOf8UVuPSAKAV/3gdpJRB3bq9+k3F+L4pnQ0Y
Zl+eGBJOssawCea5joCa2/Cbaz/p/Xf5k8D1CQGjUx52W6I6pk0DcVTaFLY1x58/
V0Owmmz1BHXRxjmiYik6QefuqN96l9bkbzuv5hKWEY2kUr3ZxtNlxXAPJpemgRPG
7iK4NC6lItvN4iirkdlBg/r4AoGXBXoXhdIozivGwtn6/hY84x31Gd

libopendbx_1.4.6-14_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2020-03-07 Thread Debian FTP Masters



Accepted:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2020 21:09:31 +0100
Source: libopendbx
Architecture: source
Version: 1.4.6-14
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group 
Changed-By: David Bürgin 
Changes:
 libopendbx (1.4.6-14) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   [ David Bürgin ]
   * QA upload.
   * Remove unused build dependencies on dh-autoreconf and autotools-dev.
   * Empty out broken debian/watch file (upstream is no longer developed).
   * Bump Standards-Version to 4.5.0 without further changes.
 .
   [ Debian Janitor ]
   * Trim trailing whitespace.
   * Bump debhelper from old 9 to 12.
   * Set debhelper-compat version in Build-Depends.
   * Fix day-of-week for changelog entries 1.3.11-1, 1.3.4-1, 1.3.3-1,
 1.3.2-1, 1.1.3-1, 1.1.2-1, 1.1.0-1, 0.9.4-1, 0.9.1-1, 0.9.0-1,
 0.9-1, 0.8-1.
Checksums-Sha1:
 f615db6871a2dfd09b48d134291afdd190f0a085 2870 libopendbx_1.4.6-14.dsc
 2c50f28327481d7e01fda4ac3e504ad5ea7f6f8c 77724 
libopendbx_1.4.6-14.debian.tar.xz
 a53bb8fd3967ac1482d64192ab4c3cfcdc96fc5c 9233 
libopendbx_1.4.6-14_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 ccf0b43de2890fa5ba326f03e6cb56d08989d6be94aa3b1c7ebc296e68ccde7b 2870 
libopendbx_1.4.6-14.dsc
 2dad91ee12c067aa5813f0742bddc0c57957fea8adff1999d40748edcda9e888 77724 
libopendbx_1.4.6-14.debian.tar.xz
 0165908939d341dbfa228259bf39dae05baff74afd7a17ac6a32adeec85e46e4 9233 
libopendbx_1.4.6-14_source.buildinfo
Files:
 7369563c7dcffdaa8f4d972ca08d63c3 2870 libs optional libopendbx_1.4.6-14.dsc
 ebe7faa62ffe68ef4cbe6233950eb7ed 77724 libs optional 
libopendbx_1.4.6-14.debian.tar.xz
 d3b45781d3b0bca5ecd0097b8d4dd4e3 9233 libs optional 
libopendbx_1.4.6-14_source.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=7wpe
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.



Processing of rafkill_1.2.2-7_source.changes

2020-03-07 Thread Debian FTP Masters
rafkill_1.2.2-7_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  rafkill_1.2.2-7.dsc
  rafkill_1.2.2-7.debian.tar.xz
  rafkill_1.2.2-7_source.buildinfo

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)



rafkill_1.2.2-7_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2020-03-07 Thread Debian FTP Masters



Accepted:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2020 21:19:37 +0100
Source: rafkill
Architecture: source
Version: 1.2.2-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group 
Changed-By: Håvard Flaget Aasen 
Closes: 947578
Changes:
 rafkill (1.2.2-7) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * QA upload.
   * d/control
 - Update Standards-Version to 4.5.0
 - Change to debhelper-compat
 - Bump debhelper to 12
 - Remove outdated Vcs-* fields
 - Wrap and sort build-dependencies
 - Remove duplicated section field
 - Add Rules-Requires-Root: no
   * d/copyright
 - Use secure URI
   * Add 106_scons_python3_patch closes: # 947578
Checksums-Sha1:
 110cdd7051e6c7913c43946348c1ab47f183db9f 1815 rafkill_1.2.2-7.dsc
 81caa834a7e4e2ca80d2902c5fb4fe3b4b8939ed 11912 rafkill_1.2.2-7.debian.tar.xz
 16546735dc624d98c028d290c145a78e0d3022c2 6878 rafkill_1.2.2-7_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 4905ad1a8a48dbba9daf718bdd6d9925df6e643205b57361165afb0c08c935b2 1815 
rafkill_1.2.2-7.dsc
 f367f0f4f54f31e989e373b892449a7f7b8800c21e0503439aaec88058b3d431 11912 
rafkill_1.2.2-7.debian.tar.xz
 8731ecc4b2cc026eaa42f6e94af7e9ab7b477c9f125483e25b2842de96084f5e 6878 
rafkill_1.2.2-7_source.buildinfo
Files:
 eec4ad1ce2cc0f2cd81dd901826de574 1815 games optional rafkill_1.2.2-7.dsc
 87d58d09dcd6c52a2b0985c353cb4ddd 11912 games optional 
rafkill_1.2.2-7.debian.tar.xz
 bd522b0b0a7fdc2a308447822417c6f2 6878 games optional 
rafkill_1.2.2-7_source.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=fe3B
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.



apt-move is marked for autoremoval from testing

2020-03-07 Thread Debian testing autoremoval watch
apt-move 4.2.27-5 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2020-03-22

It is affected by these RC bugs:
930663: apt-move: Port to apt 1.9