Processed: Debian bugs #947554
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 947554 serious Bug #947554 [src:boswars] FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1 Ignoring request to change severity of Bug 947554 to the same value. > severity 947555 serious Bug #947555 [src:btanks] FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > severity 947556 serious Bug #947556 [src:create-resources] FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > severity 947558 serious Bug #947558 [src:d1x-rebirth] FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > severity 947559 serious Bug #947559 [src:d2x-rebirth] FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > severity 947560 serious Bug #947560 [src:ffmpeg2theora] FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > severity 947561 serious Bug #947561 [src:fsplib] FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > severity 947563 serious Bug #947563 [src:glob2] FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > severity 947564 serious Bug #947564 [src:gpick] FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > severity 947565 serious Bug #947565 [src:ibus-sunpinyin] FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > severity 947566 serious Bug #947566 [src:klick] FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > severity 947567 serious Bug #947567 [src:libnxt] FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > severity 947568 serious Bug #947568 [src:mixxx] FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > severity 947569 serious Bug #947569 [src:mongo-cxx-driver-legacy] FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > severity 947570 serious Bug #947570 [src:mypaint] FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > severity 947571 serious Bug #947571 [src:netpanzer] FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > severity 947572 serious Bug #947572 [src:nsis] FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > severity 947573 serious Bug #947573 [src:nuitka] FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > severity 947575 serious Bug #947575 [src:pyexiv2] FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > severity 947578 serious Bug #947578 [src:rafkill] FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > severity 947579 serious Bug #947579 [src:rlvm] FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > severity 947582 serious Bug #947582 [src:sndobj] FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > severity 947583 serious Bug #947583 [src:tolua++] FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > severity 947585 serious Bug #947585 [src:xboxdrv] FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > severity 947586 serious Bug #947586 [src:xorp] FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > severity 947587 serious Bug #947587 [src:xsunpinyin] FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 947554: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947554 947555: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947555 947556: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947556 947558: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947558 947559: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947559 947560: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947560 947561: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947561 947563: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947563 947564: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947564 947565: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947565 947566: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947566 947567: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947567 947568: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947568 947569: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947569 947570: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947570 947571: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947571 947572: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947572 947573: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947573 947575: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947575 947578: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947578 947579: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947579 947582: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947582 947583: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947583 947585: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947585 947586: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947586 947587: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947587 Debian
Processed: tagging 932351, tagging 947554, tagging 947556, tagging 947555, tagging 947558, tagging 947559 ...
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 932351 - moreinfo unreproducible
Bug #932351 {Done: Russ Allbery } [gnubg] gnubg: Crashes on
launch
Removed tag(s) unreproducible and moreinfo.
> tags 947554 + sid bullseye
Bug #947554 [src:boswars] FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1
Added tag(s) bullseye and sid.
> tags 947556 + sid bullseye
Bug #947556 [src:create-resources] FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1
Added tag(s) sid and bullseye.
> tags 947555 + sid bullseye
Bug #947555 [src:btanks] FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1
Added tag(s) bullseye and sid.
> tags 947558 + sid bullseye
Bug #947558 [src:d1x-rebirth] FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1
Added tag(s) sid and bullseye.
> tags 947559 + sid bullseye
Bug #947559 [src:d2x-rebirth] FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1
Added tag(s) bullseye and sid.
> tags 947560 + sid bullseye
Bug #947560 [src:ffmpeg2theora] FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1
Added tag(s) sid and bullseye.
> tags 947561 + sid bullseye
Bug #947561 [src:fsplib] FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1
Added tag(s) sid and bullseye.
> tags 947566 + sid bullseye
Bug #947566 [src:klick] FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1
Added tag(s) bullseye and sid.
> tags 947565 + sid bullseye
Bug #947565 [src:ibus-sunpinyin] FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1
Added tag(s) bullseye and sid.
> tags 947567 + sid bullseye
Bug #947567 [src:libnxt] FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1
Added tag(s) bullseye and sid.
> tags 947569 + sid bullseye
Bug #947569 [src:mongo-cxx-driver-legacy] FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1
Added tag(s) sid and bullseye.
> tags 947571 + sid bullseye
Bug #947571 [src:netpanzer] FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1
Added tag(s) sid and bullseye.
> tags 947575 + sid bullseye
Bug #947575 [src:pyexiv2] FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1
Added tag(s) sid and bullseye.
> tags 947582 + sid bullseye
Bug #947582 [src:sndobj] FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1
Added tag(s) sid and bullseye.
> tags 947579 + sid bullseye
Bug #947579 [src:rlvm] FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1
Added tag(s) sid and bullseye.
> tags 947585 + sid bullseye
Bug #947585 [src:xboxdrv] FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1
Added tag(s) sid and bullseye.
> tags 947583 + sid bullseye
Bug #947583 [src:tolua++] FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1
Added tag(s) sid and bullseye.
> tags 947586 + sid bullseye
Bug #947586 [src:xorp] FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1
Added tag(s) bullseye and sid.
> tags 947587 + sid bullseye
Bug #947587 [src:xsunpinyin] FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1
Added tag(s) bullseye and sid.
> tags 947563 + sid bullseye
Bug #947563 [src:glob2] FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1
Added tag(s) bullseye and sid.
> tags 947578 + sid bullseye
Bug #947578 [src:rafkill] FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1
Added tag(s) sid and bullseye.
> tags 948836 + sid bullseye
Bug #948836 [src:gnome-dictionary] gnome-dictionary: FTBFS: failed test
Added tag(s) bullseye and sid.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
932351: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=932351
947554: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947554
947555: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947555
947556: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947556
947558: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947558
947559: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947559
947560: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947560
947561: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947561
947563: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947563
947565: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947565
947566: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947566
947567: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947567
947569: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947569
947571: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947571
947575: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947575
947578: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947578
947579: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947579
947582: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947582
947583: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947583
947585: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947585
947586: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947586
947587: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947587
948836: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=948836
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing of gnulib_20200105~a7903da-1_source.changes
gnulib_20200105~a7903da-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gnulib_20200105~a7903da-1.dsc gnulib_20200105~a7903da-1.debian.tar.xz gnulib_20200105~a7903da-1_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
gnulib_20200105~a7903da-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 16:31:05 -0500 Source: gnulib Architecture: source Version: 20200105~a7903da-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: Boyuan Yang Changes: gnulib (20200105~a7903da-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * QA upload. * Upload to unstable. Checksums-Sha1: 999c161d7baaa77b98db5e45a2142ff423daec9e 2074 gnulib_20200105~a7903da-1.dsc a57cd36d28e7546ad74754363ef5b0bfead3fb45 315596 gnulib_20200105~a7903da-1.debian.tar.xz b93a242c9fd670b0194e6d2f467179b647ed3ff0 6714 gnulib_20200105~a7903da-1_amd64.buildinfo Checksums-Sha256: 8b6521811bd3b6dea60672949884be8319aee2a81e3a9db047d22f532a438a26 2074 gnulib_20200105~a7903da-1.dsc 209022f56c5b982794ddacc0f6163c67df9c87ddfd76f3def3dfb1487ffe1dbe 315596 gnulib_20200105~a7903da-1.debian.tar.xz bfbfd6e33f14242cd16087196907cb27cb1e6bd71c8b8a0296070c3254e68af6 6714 gnulib_20200105~a7903da-1_amd64.buildinfo Files: e92185694dd50cd69866c806933496ba 2074 devel optional gnulib_20200105~a7903da-1.dsc 7004f7ad7535453c3838bd1e7cabd066 315596 devel optional gnulib_20200105~a7903da-1.debian.tar.xz 4a59c13ba8f8690affd596ea4a65d6b4 6714 devel optional gnulib_20200105~a7903da-1_amd64.buildinfo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEfncpR22H1vEdkazLwpPntGGCWs4FAl4eNa8ACgkQwpPntGGC Ws7jiw//TVB/ujLdQasmxsi4sKupysdFtjOiOh1hU8eNUBGun2ZZEjcGleKtFah7 njwmE4f4EIFr2+v9WZsKaxaBRGzoaYbe3HWQF5/GY4U0yOIsRBYvQU0uR+v5HxEa BDM+QUL9WwDyaYtrXELCAc63HdU6f0Zk+RTZiWcfeWFD7QLsOlugPWk3TJqmtPiC /5Gc6LyF7F/vEOYAPik6cra6wlUUStwdd6aQ66Oc5XH9q2bMOTg0V51DDZ/yr51b 0kIdLX1OV3jRBCr9bxiqYsfshGMizcIp4uPzjglA1OfSNsTNwT20xMq1P6AA4dpE p3X6KV+eHbQS3yvZ1t22w0V3QMAZJhXadR9R5gPH0bJO9Hn3EBf4XQ3IwHKx+5wx iHZx17FTby8BCJU4qWXKCcuof7sJTG3vMTrWkmeSJOBMhf4sw8Mp2oJy/XYT9519 fKGqwtyV4X0mKMMDnFL+e91fZ/B9GjbwfYAkBjMk92IgMY0JGq1Bk7+8m2Q6fiKJ dSuySUR+XySVjQmaFMwJuJPXq0zp4L+FmniXXZwjUIGPZGDq9ZnrtvqRMKaWbIY1 4lSx0ZHoOnYEXYxby2Qa6+aL8q93MD+MKv1vFFd9iqYK10TXFumMDtRLVoL86B8o pYXBxJkvshUMVm+pF1USVeNe8KpaFNi7jb+WQkw74CBnX/zVxTQ= =nE8e -END PGP SIGNATURE- Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Bug#915602: marked as done (Please upgrade to a newer snapshot/version)
Your message dated Tue, 14 Jan 2020 23:45:15 -0500
with message-id <4c93b955511bdb596b08f48b0eb3d51d8ee019d0.ca...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#915602: Please upgrade to a newer snapshot/version
has caused the Debian Bug report #915602,
regarding Please upgrade to a newer snapshot/version
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
915602: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=915602
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: gnulib
Version: 20140202+stable-3
Severity: normal
Hi,
Current version is quite old (2014) and some other packages seems to
require a newer version (see enchant bug #861141)
Would it be possible to upgrade to a newer version?
Kind regards,
Laurent Bigonville
-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
APT prefers unstable-debug
APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (1,
'experimental-debug'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_BE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8),
LANGUAGE=fr_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: SELinux: enabled - Mode: Permissive - Policy name: refpolicy
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 20200105~a7903da-1
This should be fixed with the upload of new gnulib snpashot.
--
Cheers,
Boyuan Yang
On Thu, 09 Jan 2020 12:09:47 -0500 Boyuan Yang wrote:
> X-Debbugs-CC: jo...@jones.dk bi...@debian.org mckins...@debian.org
>
> Hi all,
>
> A new snapshot of gnulib is currently in Experimental. I have rebuilt all
> reverse dependencies and so far only libtool would FTBFS. Actually sollya is
> also failing to build but that was due to a separate issue (
> https://bugs.debian.org/947720).
>
> I only enabled a very small portion of testsuites in the new upload. The
full
> test ("megatest" for all) would take really long time (several hours on my
> workstation) and eventually fail. We need more work to get the package into
> better shape.
>
> Thanks,
> Boyuan Yang
>
>
> On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 11:01:41 -0400 Boyuan Yang wrote:
> > X-Debbugs-CC: jo...@jones.dk bi...@debian.org
> >
> > I have played around and prepared a new packaging release in the
> experimental
> > branch based on the codebase on Oct 2019:
> > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/gnulib/tree/experimental
> >
> > The issue is that newer gnulib requires newer gettext (>= 0.20) to work,
> which
> > is not yet available in Debian. Though it's possible to patch the source
> code
> > and loosen the version requirement, I haven't really test what will
happen.
> >
> > Best,
> > Boyuan Yang
> >
> > On Fri, 07 Dec 2018 17:41:30 +0100 Jonas Smedegaard
wrote:
> > > Control: tag -1 help
> > >
> > > Hi Laurent,
> > >
> > > Quoting Laurent Bigonville (2018-12-05 09:29:03)
> > > > Current version is quite old (2014) and some other packages seems to
> > > > require a newer version (see enchant bug #861141)
> > > >
> > > > Would it be possible to upgrade to a newer version?
> > >
> > > Yes, gnulib is too old for recent enchant - in fact that is the very
> > > reason I wanted to pour some love on gnulib.
> > >
> > > Unfortunately gnulib packaging is in a bad shape: It comes with a
> > > testsuite but that is skipped - I am quite worried that a major upgrade
> > > may introduce new bugs, and therefore want to first get the testsuite
> > > enabled, learn which parts of the testsuite succeeds for the old 2014
> > > release, and only then upgrade to have a reasonable judgement if the
> > > upgrade is sane to introduce to Debian unstable.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
Bug#840782: marked as done (gnulib: please demote unnecessary dependencies to recommends)
Your message dated Tue, 14 Jan 2020 23:46:09 -0500 with message-id <5477f5ea913958453fc8b7927145ec416529704d.ca...@debian.org> and subject line Re: gnulib: please demote unnecessary dependencies to recommends has caused the Debian Bug report #840782, regarding gnulib: please demote unnecessary dependencies to recommends to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 840782: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=840782 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: gnulib Version: 20140202+stable-2 Severity: wishlist gnulib has a long list of dependencies. Most of them look like they are not actually required for using check-module or gnulib-tool. For instance, gnulib-tool seems to work just fine without bison or gperf. Looking at gnulib-tool, it seems like none of the dependencies is required to run it. Would it be sensible to just move all (or most) of them from Depends to Recommends? The actual need behind that suggestion is that gnulib currently cannot satisfy other packages' cross build dependencies, because it is not marked Multi-Arch: foreign. As long as it depends on build-essential or bison[1], it cannot be marked such. After demoting those dependencies to Recommends, it can be marked. Helmut [1] bison is currently wrongly marked Multi-Arch: foreign. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 20200105~a7903da-1 This should be fixed with the upload of new gnulib snpashot. -- Cheers, Boyuan Yang On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 21:25:48 +0200 Helmut Grohne wrote: > Package: gnulib > Version: 20140202+stable-2 > Severity: wishlist > > gnulib has a long list of dependencies. Most of them look like they are > not actually required for using check-module or gnulib-tool. For > instance, gnulib-tool seems to work just fine without bison or gperf. > > Looking at gnulib-tool, it seems like none of the dependencies is > required to run it. Would it be sensible to just move all (or most) of > them from Depends to Recommends? > > The actual need behind that suggestion is that gnulib currently cannot > satisfy other packages' cross build dependencies, because it is not > marked Multi-Arch: foreign. As long as it depends on build-essential or > bison[1], it cannot be marked such. After demoting those dependencies to > Recommends, it can be marked. > > Helmut > > [1] bison is currently wrongly marked Multi-Arch: foreign. > > signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part --- End Message ---
Bug#797015: marked as done (gnulib-tool: make failure due to version mismatch between Makefile.in.in and autoconf macros)
Your message dated Tue, 14 Jan 2020 23:47:11 -0500 with message-id <9851c85e32d379dbde2292f91e0fe14d7d4b9c99.ca...@debian.org> and subject line Re: gnulib-tool: make failure due to version mismatch between Makefile.in.in and autoconf macros has caused the Debian Bug report #797015, regarding gnulib-tool: make failure due to version mismatch between Makefile.in.in and autoconf macros to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 797015: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=797015 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: gnulib Version: 20140202+stable-2 Severity: normal Dear maintainer. I ran into compilation problems for a program (Star traders http://www.zap.org.au/software/trader/) that has a bootstrap script that uses gnulib-tool before make is run. However I got the following error message when running make: *** error: gettext infrastructure mismatch: using a Makefile.in.in from gettext version 0.19 but the autoconf macros are from gettext version 0.18 I tested using making a symlink from /usr/bin/gnulib-tool to the newest gnulib-tool from source, and this makes the error go away. Probably relevant entry in upstream gnulib changelog: 2015-04-25 [...] In build-aux/po, copy Makefile.in.in and remove-potcdate.sin from $GETTEXT. This fixes a version mismatch between Makefile.in.in and the gettext-runtime m4 files. Regards, Anders Jonsson --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 20200105~a7903da-1 This should be fixed with the upload of new gnulib snpashot. -- Cheers, Boyuan Yang On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 00:29:48 +0200 Anders Jonsson < anders.jons...@norsjovallen.se> wrote: > Package: gnulib > Version: 20140202+stable-2 > Severity: normal > > Dear maintainer. I ran into compilation problems for a program (Star > traders http://www.zap.org.au/software/trader/) that has a bootstrap > script that uses gnulib-tool before make is run. However I got the > following error message when running make: > > *** error: gettext infrastructure mismatch: using a Makefile.in.in from > gettext version 0.19 but the autoconf macros are from gettext version 0.18 > > I tested using making a symlink from /usr/bin/gnulib-tool to the newest > gnulib-tool from source, and this makes the error go away. > > Probably relevant entry in upstream gnulib changelog: > > 2015-04-25 [...] > In build-aux/po, copy Makefile.in.in and > remove-potcdate.sin from $GETTEXT. This fixes a version mismatch > between Makefile.in.in and the gettext-runtime m4 files. > > > > Regards, > Anders Jonsson > > signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part --- End Message ---
rafkill is marked for autoremoval from testing
rafkill 1.2.2-6 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2020-01-29 It is affected by these RC bugs: 947578: rafkill: FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1
Processing of gnulib_20200105~a7903da-2_source.changes
gnulib_20200105~a7903da-2_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gnulib_20200105~a7903da-2.dsc gnulib_20200105~a7903da-2.debian.tar.xz gnulib_20200105~a7903da-2_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
gnulib_20200105~a7903da-2_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 00:31:19 -0500 Source: gnulib Architecture: source Version: 20200105~a7903da-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: Boyuan Yang Changes: gnulib (20200105~a7903da-2) unstable; urgency=high . * QA upload. * Rebuild to make arm64 build successful. * debian/upstream/metadata: Set upstream metadata fields: Repository, Repository-Browse. * debian/patches/backport/0006: Add patch to fix regression introduced on 2020-01-04. * debian/clscan/clscan: Always break the file list into multiline text. This may make lintian happy with long Files: list. * debian/clscan/files.yaml: Slightly update copyright information for files under pygnulib/. * debian/copyright: Regenerated with updated clscan tool. * debian/watch: Monitor upstream Git HEAD. Checksums-Sha1: 09f331d49126cde6d2a8fac2f486ad9978de9d3f 2074 gnulib_20200105~a7903da-2.dsc 49aa7b8964e15cd140b9879e63693e6c6e23a994 316656 gnulib_20200105~a7903da-2.debian.tar.xz 5a6f3b714221cd9000c4568f905fb800315bf414 6714 gnulib_20200105~a7903da-2_amd64.buildinfo Checksums-Sha256: 2939ed7825181ee0f8b1f605e3dd7cbf185cab7a062a37b7a582831c202a130e 2074 gnulib_20200105~a7903da-2.dsc 14d34ac943da69b0069f91459bd36e13a9174f1a4cdeb848edb483a492f3cd39 316656 gnulib_20200105~a7903da-2.debian.tar.xz 2dcb98c6cb183a5e442a855000a745d5b7a6996635b0f7a6a5330802b8b0bf39 6714 gnulib_20200105~a7903da-2_amd64.buildinfo Files: e206eaf770280b463c9d841fbb28deeb 2074 devel optional gnulib_20200105~a7903da-2.dsc 1d47d9254166fe474fb2f07b4a7078f7 316656 devel optional gnulib_20200105~a7903da-2.debian.tar.xz e0ee335e1a4382e353a9d5634e166b36 6714 devel optional gnulib_20200105~a7903da-2_amd64.buildinfo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEfncpR22H1vEdkazLwpPntGGCWs4FAl4eqXUACgkQwpPntGGC Ws5L+RAAl3ZE8ptlqOP5VmwsO76OOaYbhUuKU+cctsNmBUNoVejLQam24dYAg+Ig GXKtmzVIyhhKKxPHGXU6fYcC16YkR3f+TOXEypaNdc38jPyjgWg97bIElysiaiVJ isfEHx4sAwXkGMOBEbI8z9+j6vA6dOrsYLsJe6kG9Ns+AtD7GCygM0XdViDPSqK3 UBYJqZcg2ENb4e9pm9iJ1SCw1SK8LOxHXLpEjOEaztTBYA00rCnmD6GDljxJpuTN oGJDDB3kzR24ZvTbdOm1RsGDxZFne6Jw/2VK+rmD6BDREPQNAlcItDhln4ScybY6 /kSk5yO8C0eA/f8SvTcm5geiRtWshUasIfZAJ0Dr6a20qxF7NG2MDTz3bMTGIAkU gb2CvFmbqvrI/JCXwREp1wg2yH0qJg8h1wa51qd4E83QniZHtQXAbMXVKpZkebj5 38ENxEuZpy7vJFALwxPrg049YvfPTG+bkDyBneltQBW0hXOaihsgTyTCkDGh24Ag 8yS2pqIhttRAO4tPQ6FDd+y4j70o8jTrhTYJNUQPb4v7v+LET89ru8Xdm0LbJUYS 9t7Axtok7xzjohrE7ohfjJ2QzaXHEBkfIddcoU+NPsaFh0BxYF2TkF0ytI6ni8cy OZ3ZIbRV3RDR0x5EtdLbY9Ry+IhxmwHzavE81TxDhEIM/EmdN9I= =QlOm -END PGP SIGNATURE- Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
