Processed: Re: cuneiform_1.1.0+dfsg-7 - FTBFS on ppc64el
Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #921527 [cuneiform] cuneiform_1.1.0+dfsg-7 - FTBFS on ppc64el Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' > tag -1 moreinfo Bug #921527 [cuneiform] cuneiform_1.1.0+dfsg-7 - FTBFS on ppc64el Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 921527: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=921527 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#921527: cuneiform_1.1.0+dfsg-7 - FTBFS on ppc64el
Control: severity -1 important Control: tag -1 moreinfo We currently have no ppc64el binaries for cuneiform, so this is not a regressions and therefore not RC. On Wed, 6 Feb 2019 14:50:47 +0100 "Thierry fa...@linux.ibm.com" wrote: > --- images/phototest.tif.txt 2011-04-19 12:49:57.0 + > +++ /tmp/cuneiform.test.KgXcP8dD/phototest.tif.out2018-01-14 > 03:21:46.536688277 + > @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ > -This is a lot of 12 point text to test the > -ocr code and see if it works on all types > +This is a lot of 12 poiet text to test the > +ocr code aed see if it works oe all types > of file format. Wouldn't that patch break the test for all platforms where it currently passes? Andreas
Bug#921527: cuneiform_1.1.0+dfsg-7 - FTBFS on ppc64el
Control: tag -1 - patch moreinfo On 2019-02-07 13:59, Thierry fa...@linux.ibm.com wrote: > Hi, > Sorry - I am not proposing a patch (may have write a bad bug header). OK, fixing the metadata. Andreas
Processed: Re: cuneiform_1.1.0+dfsg-7 - FTBFS on ppc64el
Processing control commands: > tag -1 - patch moreinfo Bug #921527 [cuneiform] cuneiform_1.1.0+dfsg-7 - FTBFS on ppc64el Removed tag(s) moreinfo and patch. -- 921527: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=921527 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#921527: cuneiform_1.1.0+dfsg-7 - FTBFS on ppc64el
Hi, Sorry - I am not proposing a patch (may have write a bad bug header). My point is that test is failing on ppc64el as it was failing sometime ago on other platform apparently. As such I was expecting you had an idea why on ppc64el the fixes are not accurate (or not sufficient). - Going to investigate on what was done on ubuntu side as it was mentionned to be fixed there. Thanks On 07/02/2019 13:44, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Control: severity -1 important > Control: tag -1 moreinfo > > We currently have no ppc64el binaries for cuneiform, so this is not a > regressions and therefore not RC. > > On Wed, 6 Feb 2019 14:50:47 +0100 "Thierry fa...@linux.ibm.com" > wrote: >> --- images/phototest.tif.txt 2011-04-19 12:49:57.0 + >> +++ /tmp/cuneiform.test.KgXcP8dD/phototest.tif.out 2018-01-14 >> 03:21:46.536688277 + >> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ >> -This is a lot of 12 point text to test the >> -ocr code and see if it works on all types >> +This is a lot of 12 poiet text to test the >> +ocr code aed see if it works oe all types >> of file format. > Wouldn't that patch break the test for all platforms where it currently > passes? > > Andreas > -- Thierry Fauck @ fr.ibm.com
Processing of libsoc_0.8.2-2_source.changes
libsoc_0.8.2-2_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libsoc_0.8.2-2.dsc libsoc_0.8.2-2.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Processing of libsoc_0.8.2-2_source.changes
/libsoc_0.8.2-2_source.changes is already present on target host: libsoc_0.8.2-2.debian.tar.xz Either you already uploaded it, or someone else came first. Job libsoc_0.8.2-2_source.changes removed. Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
libsoc_0.8.2-2_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2019 18:41:58 +0200 Source: libsoc Architecture: source Version: 0.8.2-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: Adrian Bunk Closes: 872439 Changes: libsoc (0.8.2-2) unstable; urgency=medium . * QA upload. * Set maintainer to Debian QA Group. (see #879389) * Add upstream fix for missing include in libsoc_gpio.h, thanks to Yegor Yefremov. (Closes: #872439) Checksums-Sha1: 427d7d787af0b7d9aeed979d66e8080aa4ec2dd1 1891 libsoc_0.8.2-2.dsc d77991a7dce157a26d5b134c48e379ecdcc180bf 2900 libsoc_0.8.2-2.debian.tar.xz Checksums-Sha256: 465af187eedae155b74bcae893d2626ab0e51f7c942c044fc708a7b8d6ef7479 1891 libsoc_0.8.2-2.dsc ef1cb384ed452311ca89dd030ab771efbce739a93a146fe365f959166a94bdf6 2900 libsoc_0.8.2-2.debian.tar.xz Files: 890478eae6a7a8a1da68bd9b63ed08c9 1891 libs optional libsoc_0.8.2-2.dsc d4705c4b2d3c0a9937cd2efd0f3170b4 2900 libs optional libsoc_0.8.2-2.debian.tar.xz -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEOvp1f6xuoR0v9F3wiNJCh6LYmLEFAlxcYgoACgkQiNJCh6LY mLHczw//atvKCcAvis5HL3LMYhrrTvPvCILWDwhsS1NKReVw4vQ499mU+XOct2CA kHRAXKsYLBGljTroziaCvYeuK2fn2jFGLiwhQjYWI3vB1Ir++RmEWZhnWzwmfEKO Iq9jAxmJuq7CvQPFo5MyDvblza7UbSVYfMnGjtX/8z+o+Vpw/qEMeY6/6CA4Dy9e D2a3Ne9+wN5dJoKkG5kraYAJydvtXKs42K+vGlER6TpIH7LikJq0GbbaFl3Im4hW hQElVfJ4KhH9cQp/aRHfzsEwi0S8wQi14azj60oIo41+te7XUu/V4EMDGPWx8o5x n5qxX8FzSsyz61aVdpeBWFXFQ6O84WHG4Z7hOEi7q37+mnwgEcYglV/DkWXy3lcY IbnGNfvXeOUAJZQmUTSY7Z1K4oYEHVYmwKikQF9xC98IMfBFhGJsZ2tEEYJt8imq QsAASUeL+qLb4fkRVX1Q9EeU8E7rOB0OCayIyWc7hOpRDKrIC8vblRS2CRNmsIMW 1xDGguvw4yOJc6QygtFBxYFl1ervuv1QOhjdkS9K5WuRb86ubXFSOabQGPNCY65j hpGj1oWWO6y87T9oj66X4/bfgq6T+i3yScIZT9bXdZKMWP14MnaVUYbDY3/rloq6 vq7MHasRT8yLYfFun3AsoHMdBPfiVB7bSmE0mu6aMYpVTeGcMSY= =Pkgg -END PGP SIGNATURE- Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
python-xmp-toolkit is marked for autoremoval from testing
python-xmp-toolkit 2.0.1+git20140309.5437b0a-5 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2019-03-01 It is affected by these RC bugs: 919007: python-xmp-toolkit: Needs to be updated for libexempi8
