Processed: Re: FTBFS with GCC 6: cannot convert x to y
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #811656 [starvoyager] FTBFS with GCC 6: cannot convert x to y Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 811656: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=811656 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#811656: FTBFS with GCC 6: cannot convert x to y
Control: severity -1 serious > I don't know how to fix this, so I just made a QA upload that makes > the package to use GCC 5. This should make the bug not to be RC for > stretch. no, gcc-5 is targeted for removal for stretch.
Processing of yowsup_2.4.103-2_source.changes
yowsup_2.4.103-2_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: yowsup_2.4.103-2.dsc yowsup_2.4.103-2.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
yowsup_2.4.103-2_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 14:31:24 -0300 Source: yowsup Binary: python-yowsup yowsup-cli Architecture: source Version: 2.4.103-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: Joao Eriberto Mota Filho Description: python-yowsup - library to implement a WhatsApp client yowsup-cli - command line tool that acts as WhatsApp client Changes: yowsup (2.4.103-2) unstable; urgency=medium . * QA upload. * Set QA Group as maintainer. (see #833486) Checksums-Sha1: bfd663fff8bedcfe9df22c60086b6991ca601628 1987 yowsup_2.4.103-2.dsc 8248571b0e1e591da0c9833b013144c9bb8943be 9188 yowsup_2.4.103-2.debian.tar.xz Checksums-Sha256: 00eccfce09c9b32e74da80c8851a2f822b0fcd74974b3791687f9b2c843b7611 1987 yowsup_2.4.103-2.dsc d06ee95ce76b46ba12da9d61847f0fad8efc08fcb372b88b0455367041f0e35c 9188 yowsup_2.4.103-2.debian.tar.xz Files: 3534ae4adbd2733a1b28abd2e88f43b4 1987 python optional yowsup_2.4.103-2.dsc 44c6e6ac20e2a72f5eedbf632a25fd2e 9188 python optional yowsup_2.4.103-2.debian.tar.xz -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJXph/8AAoJEN5juccE6+nvh10QAKxxRuUy8RN7b3HyDR+O/Kte XBkn9iYODvDG+RIzqCi1OiBzFvbt0TzDirJNleJTfI2KpXkKfsCbcBEsjwgdh6zl f2brprbuK57CZWqJT0L0Bj4hn9FAI13U+q+vG0yH0o1M4H3+dYOYW7u+Xn4aPlnU 5iEh9EzGGc+Wr6dfYo+rY2RzWVpndg2mTK9rFuR0VGJ1foRn93fKU7qVWjP4c3PG 2r6c3KYmQmQsYAegFJ1LHMgWcNixlDU8XH36ltpl8Y2jZ+yuvOU1JF26AHzoDqfp Jzbks7zChPwC69CxrevuZiOC8Jyu5Y4IAENrEPFqfXdT4iwC69bS3tSVYjVY+ZAT TDx3TBrwWUFZAysrwf0bSzWj+vgSZpXqDgRst0SRFOM3EnauBcCgMeULXy9Dkhsd QEAF1Exn3f9kuN6D6NLzfsv/gC14xV4FNIXiJpv0ucHK9uvGcdQq7eIL/5SXdtwJ T1qvJSxhzyIjOdienm4/teRjmCB2I/Ut+FmMV/yaZN2/VHCzmcY/AElBDw0XDyAk pBfBs5/+v7quQqmW6mUot8wDX54l94oXOfraBay3BHDXTc+Z//vXtNutvi4ItHjk IfGqcbKujye/YLCvm5qnqzRZKThblFoDUKllS2VekzcWqPl7SCPG6tnSwG+VWsCs xUYgIMO5SLhjN7vADDOl =Gh51 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Bug#833610: ara: please make the build reproducible
Source: ara Version: 1.0.31 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi, Whilst working on the "reproducible builds" effort [0], we noticed that ara could not be built reproducibly. Patch attached. [0] https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `- --- a/common/mkversion.sh 2016-08-06 23:30:32.763007181 +0100 --- b/common/mkversion.sh 2016-08-06 23:37:00.142190926 +0100 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ #!/bin/sh VERSION=`sed -n -e '1s/^ara (\([^ ]*\)) .*$/\1/p' ../debian/changelog` -DATE=`date +'%04Y-%02m-%02d'` +DATE=$(date --utc --date="@${SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH:-$(date +%s)}" +'%04Y-%02m-%02d') rm -f version.ml sed -e 's/\$VERSION\$/'"$VERSION"'/g' \
Bug#486339: marked as done (starvoyager: Missing library libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3)
Your message dated Sun, 7 Aug 2016 01:30:09 +0200 (CEST) with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#486339: Info received (starvoyager: Missing library debian.org) libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3) has caused the Debian Bug report #486339, regarding starvoyager: Missing library libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 486339: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=486339 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: starvoyager Version: 0.4.4-5 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable starvoyager refuses to start with the following error: starvoyager: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.20+20070716+purgatory (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages starvoyager depends on: ii libc6 2.7-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libgcc1 1:4.3.0-5 GCC support library ii libsdl-net1.2 1.2.7-2network library for Simple DirectM ii libsdl1.2debian 1.2.13-2 Simple DirectMedia Layer ii libstdc++64.3.0-5The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii starvoyager-data 0.4.4-52D space arcade game, themed aroun starvoyager recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.4.4-5 On Sat, 24 Oct 2009, debbug.10.judeb...@spamgourmet.com wrote: > This bug can be closed. > > How very embarrasing. I was so eager to play that I installed a copy before > it was available as a Debian package. Even after installing the package, the > system kept trying to use the copy in /usr/local/bin/. Now that it's been > removed, starvoyager runs without problems. > > Sorry to have taken your time. Ok, closing. Thanks.--- End Message ---
Bug#555279: marked as done (starvoyager: Should this package be orphaned (or removed)?)
Your message dated Sun, 7 Aug 2016 01:34:30 +0200 (CEST) with message-id and subject line Re: starvoyager: Should this package be orphaned (or removed)? has caused the Debian Bug report #555279, regarding starvoyager: Should this package be orphaned (or removed)? to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 555279: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555279 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: starvoyager Version: 0.4.4-5 Severity: important User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: proposed-orphan Dear Maintainer, While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a package that should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because: * Inactive upstream. * Possibly inactive maintainer, last upload 2005. (Non-DD, not in MIA). * A few un-answered bugs. If you think that it should be removed from Debian instead of being orphaned, please reply to this bug and tell so. If you disagree and want to continue to maintain this package, please close this bug and do an upload also fixing the other issues. Also, you can study the possibility of taking co-maintainers. If you agree that it should be orphaned, send the following commands to cont...@bugs.debian.org (replace nn with this bug's number): severity nn normal reassign nn wnpp retitle nn O: -- thanks If you think it should be removed, send the following commands instead: severity nn normal reassign nn ftp.debian.org retitle nn RM: -- RoM; thanks For more information, see http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-archive-manip http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ Thank you, Barry deFreese Debian QA --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- This package was effectively orphaned: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=831806 which I think answers adequately the question asked in this bug report. Thanks.--- End Message ---
mrxvt is marked for autoremoval from testing
mrxvt 0.5.4-1.2 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-08-21 It is affected by these RC bugs: 822003: mrxvt: Build arch:all+arch:any but is missing build-{arch,indep} targets