Bug#790968: readcf: DontBlameSendmail option: GroupReadableaDefaultAuthInfoFile unrecognized
Package: sendmail Version: 8.15.1-1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, I installed 8.15.1-1 today via apt-get as follows: apt-get install sendmail/experimental sendmail-base/experimental sendmail-bin/experimental sendmail-cf/experimental I remade the sendmail.cf from my sendmail.mc file by: cd /etc/mail touch sendmail.mc make I restarted sendmail: make restart and the following is in the log file: Jul 3 10:51:55 top sm-mta[26067]: NOQUEUE: SYSERR(root): /etc/mail/sendmail.cf: line 145: readcf: DontBlameSendmail option: GroupReadableaDefaultAuthInfoFile unrecognized Sendmail refuses to start. GroupReadableaDefaultAuthInfoFile appears in the following file: /usr/share/sendmail/cf/domain/debian-mta.m4: defn(`confDONT_BLAME_SENDMAIL')`,GroupWritableIncludeFile,GroupReadableaDefaultAuthInfoFile')dnl' You have a spelling error: GroupReadableaDefaultAuthInfoFile ^ GroupReadableDefaultAuthInfoFile I removed the extraneous a and sendmail starts. -- Package-specific info: Output of /usr/share/bug/sendmail/script: ls -alR /etc/mail: /etc/mail: total 524 drwxr-sr-x 8 smmta smmsp 4096 Jul 3 10:43 . drwxr-xr-x 124 root root 12288 Jul 3 10:47 .. -rwxr-xr-- 1 root smmsp 12677 Jul 3 10:40 Makefile -rw--- 1 root root 31810 Jul 3 10:38 access -rw-r- 1 smmta smmsp 77824 Jul 3 10:38 access.db -rw-r--r-- 1 root root281 Feb 11 2013 address.resolve -rw-r--r-- 1 root root546 Mar 30 16:00 aliases -rw-r- 1 smmta smmsp 12288 May 12 20:50 aliases.db drwxr-s--- 2 smmta smmsp 4096 Aug 5 2014 certs -rw-r--r-- 1 root smmsp 3571 Jul 3 10:40 databases -rw-r- 1 smmta smmsp52 Jul 21 2014 default-auth-info -rw-r--r-- 1 root smmsp 161 Mar 30 16:00 genericstable -rw-r- 1 root smmsp 12288 Jul 3 10:38 genericstable.db -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5659 May 11 00:38 helpfile -rw-r--r-- 1 root smmsp 116 Mar 30 16:00 local-host-names drwxr-sr-x 2 smmta smmsp 4096 Jul 3 09:03 m4 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 57 Mar 30 16:00 mailertable -rw-r- 1 root smmsp 12288 Jul 3 10:38 mailertable.db drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jul 3 10:38 peers drwxr-xr-x 2 smmta smmsp 4096 Mar 22 11:42 sasl -rw-r--r-- 1 root smmsp 79338 Jul 3 10:40 sendmail.cf -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 79219 Jul 3 10:38 sendmail.cf.old -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 12236 Jul 3 10:38 sendmail.conf -rw-r--r-- 1 root smmsp 8049 Jul 3 10:40 sendmail.mc -rw-r--r-- 1 root smmsp 4216 Jul 21 2014 sendmail.mc.orig -rw-r--r-- 1 root root149 Feb 11 2013 service.switch -rw-r--r-- 1 root root180 Feb 11 2013 service.switch-nodns drwxr-sr-x 2 smmta smmsp 4096 Jul 21 2014 smrsh lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Jul 11 2014 spamassassin -> ../spamassassin -rw-r--r-- 1 root smmsp 44133 Jul 3 10:38 submit.cf -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 44006 Jul 3 10:38 submit.cf.old -rw-r--r-- 1 root smmsp 2374 Jul 3 10:38 submit.mc drwxr-xr-x 2 smmta smmsp 4096 Mar 20 14:04 tls -rw-r--r-- 1 root smmsp 0 Jul 21 2014 trusted-users -rw-r--r-- 1 root smmsp 10535 Mar 30 16:00 virtusertable -rw-r- 1 root smmsp 12288 Jul 3 10:38 virtusertable.db /etc/mail/certs: total 40 drwxr-s--- 2 smmta smmsp 4096 Aug 5 2014 . drwxr-sr-x 8 smmta smmsp 4096 Jul 3 10:43 .. -rw-r- 1 smmta smmsp 1391 Jun 14 2014 geotrust-ca.crt -rw-r- 1 smmta smmsp 3237 Jun 13 2014 networkguild.org.crt -rw-r- 1 smmta smmsp 1070 Jun 13 2014 networkguild.org.csr -rw-r- 1 smmta smmsp 1675 Jun 13 2014 networkguild.org.key -rw-r- 1 smmta smmsp 2212 Aug 3 2014 sub.class1.server.ca.pem -rw-r- 1 smmta smmsp 2281 Aug 5 2014 top.networkguild.org.crt -rw-r- 1 smmta smmsp 1090 Aug 2 2014 top.networkguild.org.csr -rw-r- 1 smmta smmsp 1704 Aug 2 2014 top.networkguild.org.key /etc/mail/m4: total 12 drwxr-sr-x 2 smmta smmsp 4096 Jul 3 09:03 . drwxr-sr-x 8 smmta smmsp 4096 Jul 3 10:43 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 789 Jul 4 2014 clamav-milter.m4 -rw-r- 1 root smmsp0 Jul 21 2014 dialup.m4 -rw-r- 1 root smmsp0 Jul 21 2014 provider.m4 /etc/mail/peers: total 12 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jul 3 10:38 . drwxr-sr-x 8 smmta smmsp 4096 Jul 3 10:43 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 328 Feb 11 2013 provider /etc/mail/sasl: total 28 drwxr-xr-x 2 smmta smmsp 4096 Mar 22 11:42 . drwxr-sr-x 8 smmta smmsp 4096 Jul 3 10:43 .. -rw-r- 1 smmta smmsp 894 Jul 21 2014 Sendmail.conf.2 -rw-r- 1 root root 885 Jul 21 2014 Sendmail.conf.2.orig -rwxr--r-- 1 root root 3635 Jul 3 10:38 sasl.m4 -rwxr--r-- 1 root root 3693 Jul 21 2014 sasl.m4.orig -rwxr--r-- 1 root root 3628 Mar 22 11:30 sasl.m4.testing /etc/mail/smrsh: total 8 drwxr-sr-x 2 smmta smmsp 4096 Jul 21 2014 . drwxr-sr-x 8 smmta smmsp 4096 Jul 3 10:43 .. lrwxrwxrwx 1 root smmsp 26 Jul 21 2014 mail.local -> /usr/lib/sm.bin/mail.local lrwxrwxrwx 1 root smmsp 17 Jul 21 2014 procmail -> /usr/bin/procmail /etc/mail/tls: total 52 drwxr-xr-x 2 smmta smmsp 4096
Bug#790983: blackbox: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default
Package: src:blackbox Version: 0.70.1-29 Severity: important Tags: sid stretch User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: libstdc++-cxx11 Background [1]: libstdc++6 introduces a new ABI to conform to the C++11 standard, but keeps the old ABI to not break existing binaries. Packages which are built with g++-5 from experimental (not the one from testing/unstable) are using the new ABI. Libraries built from this source package export some of the new __cxx11 or B5cxx11 symbols, and dropping other symbols. If these symbols are part of the API of the library, then this rebuild with g++-5 will trigger a transition for the library. What is needed: - Rebuild the library using g++/g++-5 from experimental. Note that most likely all C++ libraries within the build dependencies need a rebuild too. You can find the log for a rebuild in https://people.debian.org/~doko/logs/gcc5-20150701/ Search for "BEGIN GCC CXX11" in the log. - Decide if the symbols matching __cxx11 or B5cxx11 are part of the library API, and are used by the reverse dependencies of the library. - If there are no symbols matching __cxx11 or B5cxx11 in the symbols forming the library API, you should close this issue with a short explanation. - If there are no reverse dependencies, it should be the package maintainers decision if a transition is needed. However this might break software which is not in the Debian archive, and built against these packages. - If a library transition is needed, please prepare for the change. Rename the library package, append "v5" to the name of the package (e.g. libfoo2 -> libfoo2v5). Such a change can be avoided, if you have a soversion bump and you upload this version instead of the renamed package. Prepare a patch and attach it to this issue (mark this issue with patch), so that it is possible to NMU such a package. We'll probably have more than hundred transitions triggered. Then reassign the issue to release.debian.org and properly tag it as a transition issue, by sending an email to cont...@bugs.debian.org: user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertag + transition block by 790756 reassign release.debian.org - If unsure if a transition is needed, please tag the issue with help to ask for feedback from other Debian developers. The libstdc++6 transition will be a large one, and it will come with a lot of pain. Please help it by preparing the follow-up transitions. [1] https://wiki.debian.org/GCC5#libstdc.2B-.2B-_ABI_transition -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1zb0i9-0006f4...@paradis.debian.org
Bug#791056: gnuift: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default
Package: src:gnuift Version: 0.1.14-12.1 Severity: important Tags: sid stretch User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: libstdc++-cxx11 Background [1]: libstdc++6 introduces a new ABI to conform to the C++11 standard, but keeps the old ABI to not break existing binaries. Packages which are built with g++-5 from experimental (not the one from testing/unstable) are using the new ABI. Libraries built from this source package export some of the new __cxx11 or B5cxx11 symbols, and dropping other symbols. If these symbols are part of the API of the library, then this rebuild with g++-5 will trigger a transition for the library. What is needed: - Rebuild the library using g++/g++-5 from experimental. Note that most likely all C++ libraries within the build dependencies need a rebuild too. You can find the log for a rebuild in https://people.debian.org/~doko/logs/gcc5-20150701/ Search for "BEGIN GCC CXX11" in the log. - Decide if the symbols matching __cxx11 or B5cxx11 are part of the library API, and are used by the reverse dependencies of the library. - If there are no symbols matching __cxx11 or B5cxx11 in the symbols forming the library API, you should close this issue with a short explanation. - If there are no reverse dependencies, it should be the package maintainers decision if a transition is needed. However this might break software which is not in the Debian archive, and built against these packages. - If a library transition is needed, please prepare for the change. Rename the library package, append "v5" to the name of the package (e.g. libfoo2 -> libfoo2v5). Such a change can be avoided, if you have a soversion bump and you upload this version instead of the renamed package. Prepare a patch and attach it to this issue (mark this issue with patch), so that it is possible to NMU such a package. We'll probably have more than hundred transitions triggered. Then reassign the issue to release.debian.org and properly tag it as a transition issue, by sending an email to cont...@bugs.debian.org: user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertag + transition block by 790756 reassign release.debian.org - If unsure if a transition is needed, please tag the issue with help to ask for feedback from other Debian developers. The libstdc++6 transition will be a large one, and it will come with a lot of pain. Please help it by preparing the follow-up transitions. [1] https://wiki.debian.org/GCC5#libstdc.2B-.2B-_ABI_transition -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1zb0jp-00071j...@paradis.debian.org
Bug#791146: libofa: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default
Package: src:libofa Version: 0.9.3-7 Severity: important Tags: sid stretch User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: libstdc++-cxx11 Background [1]: libstdc++6 introduces a new ABI to conform to the C++11 standard, but keeps the old ABI to not break existing binaries. Packages which are built with g++-5 from experimental (not the one from testing/unstable) are using the new ABI. Libraries built from this source package export some of the new __cxx11 or B5cxx11 symbols, and dropping other symbols. If these symbols are part of the API of the library, then this rebuild with g++-5 will trigger a transition for the library. What is needed: - Rebuild the library using g++/g++-5 from experimental. Note that most likely all C++ libraries within the build dependencies need a rebuild too. You can find the log for a rebuild in https://people.debian.org/~doko/logs/gcc5-20150701/ Search for "BEGIN GCC CXX11" in the log. - Decide if the symbols matching __cxx11 or B5cxx11 are part of the library API, and are used by the reverse dependencies of the library. - If there are no symbols matching __cxx11 or B5cxx11 in the symbols forming the library API, you should close this issue with a short explanation. - If there are no reverse dependencies, it should be the package maintainers decision if a transition is needed. However this might break software which is not in the Debian archive, and built against these packages. - If a library transition is needed, please prepare for the change. Rename the library package, append "v5" to the name of the package (e.g. libfoo2 -> libfoo2v5). Such a change can be avoided, if you have a soversion bump and you upload this version instead of the renamed package. Prepare a patch and attach it to this issue (mark this issue with patch), so that it is possible to NMU such a package. We'll probably have more than hundred transitions triggered. Then reassign the issue to release.debian.org and properly tag it as a transition issue, by sending an email to cont...@bugs.debian.org: user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertag + transition block by 790756 reassign release.debian.org - If unsure if a transition is needed, please tag the issue with help to ask for feedback from other Debian developers. The libstdc++6 transition will be a large one, and it will come with a lot of pain. Please help it by preparing the follow-up transitions. [1] https://wiki.debian.org/GCC5#libstdc.2B-.2B-_ABI_transition -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1zb0kx-0007jq...@paradis.debian.org
Bug#791347: src:libexplain: FTBFS on ppc64el
Package: src:libexplain Version: 1.4.D001-2 Severity: normal Tags: patch Dear Maintainer, While trying to build the package on ppc64el, the test t0056a fails on an error related with the O_LARGEFILE flag. PATH=`pwd`/bin:$PATH /bin/sh test/00/t0056a.sh 3c3 < which is unsuitable for writing (O_RDONLY | O_LARGEFILE) --- > which is unsuitable for writing (O_RDONLY | 020) FAILED test of write vs EINVAL make[1]: *** [t0056a] Error 1 Makefile:40798: recipe for target 't0056a' failed make[1]: Leaving directory '/«PKGBUILDDIR»' dh_auto_test: make -j1 check returned exit code 2 make: *** [build-arch] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build-arch gave error exit status 2 The attached patch includes a workaround to set O_LARGEFILE_HIDDEN to the proper value on ppc64el architecture. Thanks for considering this patch. Regards, Erwan. -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: ppc64el (ppc64le) Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-powerpc64le Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash diff -Naur a/debian/patches/ppc64el-largefile.patch b/debian/patches/ppc64el-largefile.patch --- a/debian/patches/ppc64el-largefile.patch1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ b/debian/patches/ppc64el-largefile.patch2015-07-03 17:44:40.517180785 +0200 @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +diff -Naur a/libexplain/ac/fcntl.h b/libexplain/ac/fcntl.h +--- a/libexplain/ac/fcntl.h2015-07-03 17:24:03.657246523 +0200 b/libexplain/ac/fcntl.h2015-07-03 17:31:13.741223664 +0200 +@@ -58,7 +58,12 @@ + * flags values returned by the kernel. + */ + #if defined(__linux__) && (O_LARGEFILE == 0) ++#if !defined(__PPC64__) + #define O_LARGEFILE_HIDDEN 010 ++#else ++/* workaround for ppc64el */ ++#define O_LARGEFILE_HIDDEN 020 ++#endif + #endif + + diff -Naur a/debian/patches/series b/debian/patches/series --- a/debian/patches/series 2015-07-03 17:24:02.861246565 +0200 +++ b/debian/patches/series 2015-07-03 17:34:19.833213774 +0200 @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ autofoo.patch alpha-fcntl-h.patch +ppc64el-largefile.patch
Processing of libpcapnav_0.8-3_amd64.changes
libpcapnav_0.8-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libpcapnav_0.8-3.dsc libpcapnav_0.8-3.debian.tar.xz libpcapnav0-dev_0.8-3_amd64.deb libpcapnav0_0.8-3_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1zbevt-0006tu...@franck.debian.org
Bug#647871: marked as done (init.d status support)
Your message dated Sat, 04 Jul 2015 06:34:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#647871: fixed in oidentd 2.0.8-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #647871,
regarding init.d status support
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
647871: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=647871
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: oidentd
Version: 2.0.8-4
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Here is a patch to add support for the "status" action to the init
script of oidentd.
diff -u oidentd-2.0.8/debian/init oidentd-2.0.8/debian/init
--- oidentd-2.0.8/debian/init
+++ oidentd-2.0.8/debian/init
@@ -54,8 +54,11 @@
start-stop-daemon --start --quiet --exec ${OIDENTD} -- ${OPTIONS}
log_end_msg $?
;;
+ status)
+ status_of_proc "$OIDENTD" "oidentd" && exit 0 || exit $?
+ ;;
*)
- log_success_msg "Usage: $0 {start|stop|restart|reload|force-reload}"
+ log_success_msg "Usage: $0 {start|stop|restart|reload|force-reload|status}"
exit 1
;;
esac
diff -u oidentd-2.0.8/debian/changelog oidentd-2.0.8/debian/changelog
--- oidentd-2.0.8/debian/changelog
+++ oidentd-2.0.8/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+oidentd (2.0.8-4.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+ * Add support for "status" action to init.d script
+
+ -- Peter Eisentraut Mon, 07 Nov 2011 06:39:36 +0200
+
oidentd (2.0.8-4) unstable; urgency=low
* Bind to ipv6-socket by default as well (Closes: #533604)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: oidentd
Source-Version: 2.0.8-7
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
oidentd, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 647...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Unit 193 (supplier of updated oidentd package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 06:01:08 -0400
Source: oidentd
Binary: oidentd
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.0.8-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group
Changed-By: Unit 193
Description:
oidentd- replacement ident daemon
Closes: 647871 778035
Changes:
oidentd (2.0.8-7) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* QA upload.
.
[ Unit 193 ]
* d/p/ftbfs-gcc5.patch: Fix a failure to build with gcc5. (Closes: #778035)
* Add d/watch from Bart Martens.
.
[ Peter Eisentraut ]
* Add support for "status" action to init.d script. (Closes: #647871)
Checksums-Sha1:
b441abd79b1a76a645c23260974c9eaa51859d46 1678 oidentd_2.0.8-7.dsc
f7018a17e9b5909442b9b0424cb1f391acee6478 14466 oidentd_2.0.8-7.diff.gz
0a184b0ebf2933c3b8fcbf6056669bf6d7ae983a 50504 oidentd_2.0.8-7_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
a810aab1bd9bee4eac77b74240d6a1aabb94e0289b944a834d29484949961c03 1678
oidentd_2.0.8-7.dsc
24fa5a24834a5c179db92f7d353a8a8413d17b2cab7f5162a53a43ea678f6708 14466
oidentd_2.0.8-7.diff.gz
6f78c1813c26121fcaa53a0f1479cbd0cd5d4164550e6e8090374ef2f8983cf1 50504
oidentd_2.0.8-7_amd64.deb
Files:
01ea3ec803cb1fdc7b69f1128d4f8049 1678 net extra oidentd_2.0.8-7.dsc
6bfe8ec622f269df002a4b30a5c7b308 14466 net extra oidentd_2.0.8-7.diff.gz
c04e02927b16696d967b0655c6feea51 50504 net extra oidentd_2.0.8-7_amd64.deb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1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=8jPI
-END PGP SIGNATURE End Message ---
Processing of oidentd_2.0.8-7_amd64.changes
oidentd_2.0.8-7_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: oidentd_2.0.8-7.dsc oidentd_2.0.8-7.diff.gz oidentd_2.0.8-7_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1zbgxj-0002gf...@franck.debian.org
oidentd_2.0.8-7_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 06:01:08 -0400 Source: oidentd Binary: oidentd Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2.0.8-7 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: Unit 193 Description: oidentd- replacement ident daemon Closes: 647871 778035 Changes: oidentd (2.0.8-7) unstable; urgency=medium . * QA upload. . [ Unit 193 ] * d/p/ftbfs-gcc5.patch: Fix a failure to build with gcc5. (Closes: #778035) * Add d/watch from Bart Martens. . [ Peter Eisentraut ] * Add support for "status" action to init.d script. (Closes: #647871) Checksums-Sha1: b441abd79b1a76a645c23260974c9eaa51859d46 1678 oidentd_2.0.8-7.dsc f7018a17e9b5909442b9b0424cb1f391acee6478 14466 oidentd_2.0.8-7.diff.gz 0a184b0ebf2933c3b8fcbf6056669bf6d7ae983a 50504 oidentd_2.0.8-7_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: a810aab1bd9bee4eac77b74240d6a1aabb94e0289b944a834d29484949961c03 1678 oidentd_2.0.8-7.dsc 24fa5a24834a5c179db92f7d353a8a8413d17b2cab7f5162a53a43ea678f6708 14466 oidentd_2.0.8-7.diff.gz 6f78c1813c26121fcaa53a0f1479cbd0cd5d4164550e6e8090374ef2f8983cf1 50504 oidentd_2.0.8-7_amd64.deb Files: 01ea3ec803cb1fdc7b69f1128d4f8049 1678 net extra oidentd_2.0.8-7.dsc 6bfe8ec622f269df002a4b30a5c7b308 14466 net extra oidentd_2.0.8-7.diff.gz c04e02927b16696d967b0655c6feea51 50504 net extra oidentd_2.0.8-7_amd64.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVl3xaAAoJEI7tzBuqHzL/2q4P/RLoTp7BZhR6QGcDo3Q7dzFE 11D6vE0NhE+NYpH0X5H5ASLviR9x6PepiE5HcUaDO+RirqmOfmZX8NVfyKACeiGO PPKHVrm8voWhDji0Gb2hwimHkTdTawfnY5nwM0lnifq6PXwfNnO2Hu5sn0gB3umb GcqVsW2dotzT8n7CmmQjSy8Y1fu++e97INDFPm7sJvITyBPUk2r4S36TFMNAN8VG XABHpyOkD4m2ZP03laSVfA7E+nKACMKiF2swjDtJDSz46N34GXZZdEp9WRqTvzf7 fyHOKP/2yqap4fKJSYadyQQ60rADM8oK5Tq8oPqqSCiSlaoyh4NBgbHVCx4nYqBN xO8BcaeMOXdokoijVmECV+DavY5WhaswGxSoXDea1agGTOBxzvBpguAicvB4VhN6 xrynJi2PB4jEcfOWX7m2iFEtRDYd7WHOBH8GLY1ZmKY2V2KjeFSleGA9koI4JID7 +RJH0tvoIIpavqgGgUy0klz4INT61mgz8l/nsqU2P7d89ovuptAF2pN485npj4hl 5hH3xg/OPHCO/7KOvukUKRjfZ4VMbwTvhGvreGITHKmqFJiEHbsxREjnR0nRehDP I3qat6SzYM5ZStRad23iQGp1MOE1hdLn91PR+V75+DnygsEZXhbsoIHNogsjrp2X LcADLRk/579BbecX2/aS =8jPI -END PGP SIGNATURE- Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1zbh1q-00031i...@franck.debian.org
Bug#778035: marked as done (oidentd: ftbfs with GCC-5)
Your message dated Sat, 04 Jul 2015 06:34:22 + with message-id and subject line Bug#778035: fixed in oidentd 2.0.8-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #778035, regarding oidentd: ftbfs with GCC-5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 778035: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=778035 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: src:oidentd Version: 2.0.8-6 Severity: normal Tags: sid stretch User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-5 Please keep this issue open in the bug tracker for the package it was filed for. If a fix in another package is required, please file a bug for the other package (or clone), and add a block in this package. Please keep the issue open until the package can be built in a follow-up test rebuild. The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with gcc-5/g++-5, but succeeds to build with gcc-4.9/g++-4.9. The severity of this report may be raised before the stretch release. The full build log can be found at: http://people.debian.org/~doko/logs/gcc5-20150205/oidentd_2.0.8-6_unstable_gcc5.log The last lines of the build log are at the end of this report. To build with GCC 5, either set CC=gcc-5 CXX=g++-5 explicitly, or install the gcc, g++, gfortran, ... packages from experimental. apt-get -t experimental install g++ Common build failures are C11 as the default C mode, new warnings resulting in build failures with -Werror turned on, or new/dropped symbols in Debian symbols files. For other C/C++ related build failures see the porting guide at http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/porting_to.html [...] ^ gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. "-Imissing" -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -funsigned-char -O0 -fvar-tracking -g3 -ggdb -g3 -ggdb -O0 -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wall -c oidentd_cfg_scan.c In file included from oidentd_cfg_scan.l:37:0: ./oidentd_util.h:61:12: warning: inline function 'randval' declared but never defined inline int randval(int i); ^ oidentd_cfg_scan.c:1484:12: warning: 'input' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] static int input() ^ gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. "-Imissing" -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -funsigned-char -O0 -fvar-tracking -g3 -ggdb -g3 -ggdb -O0 -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wall -c oidentd_cfg_parse.c In file included from oidentd_cfg_parse.y:38:0: ./oidentd_util.h:61:12: warning: inline function 'randval' declared but never defined inline int randval(int i); ^ gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. "-Imissing" -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -funsigned-char -O0 -fvar-tracking -g3 -ggdb -g3 -ggdb -O0 -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wall -c os.c os.c: In function 'masq': os.c:324:13: warning: variable 'remoten' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] in_addr_t remoten; ^ os.c:320:13: warning: variable 'nport' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] in_port_t nport; ^ In file included from os.c:36:0: os.c: At top level: ./oidentd_util.h:61:12: warning: inline function 'randval' declared but never defined inline int randval(int i); ^ gcc -funsigned-char -O0 -fvar-tracking -g3 -ggdb -g3 -ggdb -O0 -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wall -Wl,-z,relro -o oidentd oidentd.o oidentd_util.o oidentd_inet_util.o oidentd_user_db.o oidentd_options.o oidentd_masq.o oidentd_cfg_scan.o oidentd_cfg_parse.o os.o -Lmissing -lmissing oidentd_user_db.o: In function `random_ident': /«PKGBUILDDIR»/src/oidentd_user_db.c:89: undefined reference to `randval' oidentd_user_db.o: In function `select_reply': /«PKGBUILDDIR»/src/oidentd_user_db.c:99: undefined reference to `randval' oidentd_user_db.o: In function `random_ident_numeric': /«PKGBUILDDIR»/src/oidentd_user_db.c:116: undefined reference to `randval' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status make[4]: *** [oidentd] Error 1 Makefile:259: recipe for target 'oidentd' failed make[4]: Leaving directory '/«PKGBUILDDIR»/src' make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 Makefile:326: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed make[3]: Leaving directory '/«PKGBUILDDIR»/src' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 Makefile:229: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed make[2]: Leaving directory '/«PKGBUILDDIR»' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 Makefile:167: recipe for target 'all' failed make[1]: Leaving directory '/«PKGBUILDDIR»' make: *** [debian/stamp-makefile-build] Error 2 /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/makefile.mk:47: recipe for target 'debian
