Bug#751768: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 1.0-12+rm Dear submitter, as the package tslib has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/751768 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1xgxfj-00067h...@franck.debian.org
Bug#751768: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: libts-0.0-0 | 1.0-12 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x, sparc libts-0.0-0-dbg | 1.0-12 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x, sparc libts-bin | 1.0-12 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x, sparc libts-dev | 1.0-12 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x, sparc tsconf | 1.0-12 | all tslib | 1.0-12 | source --- Reason --- ROM; deprecated upstream -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 751...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/751768 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1xgxfd-00065j...@franck.debian.org
Bug#765517: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: anubis | 4.1.1+dfsg1-4 | source, amd64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390x, sparc --- Reason --- RoQA; orphaned, blocks guile-1.8 removal -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 765...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/765517 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1xgxl8-00089o...@franck.debian.org
Bug#765517: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 4.1.1+dfsg1-4+rm Dear submitter, as the package anubis has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/765517 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1xgxli-0008by...@franck.debian.org
Bug#624043: marked as done (anubis: Uses deprecated _set_priority GnuTLS functions)
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:38:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#765517: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #624043, regarding anubis: Uses deprecated _set_priority GnuTLS functions to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 624043: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=624043 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: anubis Version: 4.1.1+dfsg1-3 Severity: normal User: ametz...@downhill.at.eu.org Usertags: deprecated-gnutls-2.12 This package is using some functions which are marked deprecated in newer versions of GnuTLS (>=2.12.x). (They are not yet removed, though.) These functions will be removed in future releases. GnuTLS 2.12.x is already available in experimental. Excerpt from buildlog: tls.c:167:3: warning: 'gnutls_protocol_set_priority' is deprecated (declared at /usr/include/gnutls/compat.h:344) tls.c:168:3: warning: 'gnutls_cipher_set_priority' is deprecated (declared at /usr/include/gnutls/compat.h:335) tls.c:169:3: warning: 'gnutls_compression_set_priority' is deprecated (declared at /usr/include/gnutls/compat.h:339) tls.c:170:3: warning: 'gnutls_kx_set_priority' is deprecated (declared at /usr/include/gnutls/compat.h:342) tls.c:171:3: warning: 'gnutls_mac_set_priority' is deprecated (declared at /usr/include/gnutls/compat.h:337) The gnutls_*_set_priority family of functions has been marked deprecated in 2.12.x. These functions have been superceded by gnutls_priority_set_direct(). The replacement function was added in gnutls stable release 2.2.0 (released 2007-12-14). cu Andreas --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 4.1.1+dfsg1-4+rm Dear submitter, as the package anubis has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/765517 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
Bug#643975: marked as done (anubis: compiled without GPG support on some architectures)
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:38:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#765517: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #643975, regarding anubis: compiled without GPG support on some architectures to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 643975: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=643975 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: anubis Version: 4.1.1+dfsg1-3 Severity: important On i386 (and perhaps other architectures), anubis is not compiled with GPG support. From the build log: checking for gpgme-config... /usr/bin/gpgme-config checking for GPGME - version >= 1.0.0... yes checking for main in -lgpgme... yes checking for gpg... /usr/bin/gpg checking gpgme.h usability... no checking gpgme.h presence... no checking for gpgme.h... no config.log contains: configure:18354: checking gpgme.h usability configure:18371: i486-linux-gnu-gcc -c -Wall -g -O2 conftest.c >&5 In file included from conftest.c:148:0: /usr/include/gpgme.h:80:2: error: #error GPGME was compiled with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS = 64, please see the section "Largefile support (LFS)" in the GPGME manual. configure:18377: $? = 1 configure: failed program was: | /* confdefs.h. */ | #define PACKAGE_NAME "GNU Anubis" | #define PACKAGE_TARNAME "anubis" | #define PACKAGE_VERSION "4.1.1" | #define PACKAGE_STRING "GNU Anubis 4.1.1" | #define PACKAGE_BUGREPORT "bug-anu...@gnu.org" | #define PACKAGE "anubis" | #define VERSION "4.1.1" | #define _GNU_SOURCE 1 | #define STDC_HEADERS 1 | #define HAVE_SYS_TYPES_H 1 | #define HAVE_SYS_STAT_H 1 | #define HAVE_STDLIB_H 1 | #define HAVE_STRING_H 1 | #define HAVE_MEMORY_H 1 | #define HAVE_STRINGS_H 1 | #define HAVE_INTTYPES_H 1 | #define HAVE_STDINT_H 1 | #define HAVE_UNISTD_H 1 | #define __EXTENSIONS__ 1 | #define _ALL_SOURCE 1 | #define _GNU_SOURCE 1 | #define _POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS 1 | #define _TANDEM_SOURCE 1 | #define HAVE_FSEEKO 1 | #define IDECRYPT_PATH "/usr/sbin/idecrypt" | #define STDC_HEADERS 1 | #define RETSIGTYPE void | #define HAVE_ARPA_INET_H 1 | #define HAVE_SYSLOG_H 1 | #define HAVE_REGEX_H 1 | #define HAVE_SYS_TYPES_H 1 | #define HAVE_SYS_SOCKET_H 1 | #define HAVE_SYSEXITS_H 1 | #define HAVE_LOCALE_H 1 | #define HAVE_ALLOCA_H 1 | #define HAVE_ALLOCA 1 | #define HAVE_ERRNO_H 1 | #define HAVE_STDIO_EXT_H 1 | #define HAVE_TERMIOS_H 1 | #define HAVE_UNISTD_H 1 | #define HAVE_STDINT_H 1 | #define HAVE_WCHAR_H 1 | #define HAVE_STDIO_H 1 | #define HAVE_STDLIB_H 1 | #define HAVE_SYS_SOCKET_H 1 | #define HAVE_STRING_H 1 | #define HAVE_SYSEXITS_H 1 | #define HAVE_DECL_STRERROR_R 1 | #define HAVE_STRERROR_R 1 | #define STRERROR_R_CHAR_P 1 | #define HAVE_DECL_GETDELIM 1 | #define HAVE_DECL_GETLINE 1 | #define HAVE_GETOPT_H 1 | #define HAVE_GETOPT_LONG_ONLY 1 | #define HAVE_DECL_GETENV 1 | #define HAVE_DECL_GETPASS 1 | #define HAVE___FSETLOCKING 1 | #define HAVE_TCGETATTR 1 | #define HAVE_TCSETATTR 1 | #define HAVE_SETENV 1 | #define HAVE_DECL_FFLUSH_UNLOCKED 1 | #define HAVE_DECL_FLOCKFILE 1 | #define HAVE_DECL_FPUTS_UNLOCKED 1 | #define HAVE_DECL_FUNLOCKFILE 1 | #define HAVE_DECL_PUTC_UNLOCKED 1 | #define HAVE_STDLIB_H 1 | #define MALLOC_0_IS_NONNULL 1 | #define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT 1 | #define HAVE__BOOL 1 | #define HAVE_STDBOOL_H 1 | #define HAVE_UNSIGNED_LONG_LONG_INT 1 | #define HAVE_DECL_STRDUP 1 | #define restrict __restrict | #define HAVE_WINT_T 1 | #define HAVE_ALLOCA 1 | #define HAVE_ENVIRON_DECL 1 | #define HAVE_GETDELIM 1 | #define HAVE_GETPASS 1 | #define HAVE_INLINE 1 | #define HAVE_MALLOC_POSIX 1 | #define HAVE_OBSTACK 1 | #define HAVE_REALLOC_POSIX 1 | #define HAVE_STRUCT_RANDOM_DATA 1 | #define HAVE_STRDUP 1 | #define HAVE_SYSLOG 1 | #define HAVE_GETRLIMIT 1 | #define HAVE_SETRLIMIT 1 | #define HAVE_SOCKETPAIR 1 | #define HAVE_STRDUP 1 | #define HAVE_SETEGID 1 | #define HAVE_SETREGID 1 | #define HAVE_SETRESGID 1 | #define HAVE_SETEUID 1 | #define HAVE_SETREUID 1 | #define HAVE_REGCOMP 1 | #define HAVE_DAEMON 1 | #define HAVE_PUTENV 1 | #define PROTOTYPES 1 | #define __PROTOTYPES 1 | #define HAVE_LIBNSL 1 | #define ENABLE_NLS 1 | #define HAVE_GETTEXT 1 | #define HAVE_DCGETTEXT 1 | #define GUILE_VERSION 18 | #define WITH_GUILE 1 | #define HAVE_SCM_LONG2NUM 1 | #define HAVE_SCM_CELL 1 | #define HAVE_SCM_LIST_1 1 | #define HAVE_SCM_LIST_N 1 | #define HAVE_SCM_C_DEFINE 1 | #define HAVE_SCM_C_LOOKUP 1 | #define HAVE_LIBGPGME 1 | /* end confdefs.h. */ | #include | #ifdef HAVE_SYS_TYPES_H | # include | #endif | #ifdef HAVE_SYS_STAT_H | # include | #endif | #ifdef STDC_HEADERS | # include | # inclu
Bug#661030: marked as done (anubis: Use packaging format 3.0)
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:38:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#765517: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #661030, regarding anubis: Use packaging format 3.0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 661030: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=661030 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: anubis Version: 4.1.1+dfsg1-3.1 Severity: wishlist The new 3.0 packaging format contains patch managemet built-in which would make it possible to drop obsolete dpatch dependency. This would also fix error reportbug by Lintian. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-1-686-pae (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 4.1.1+dfsg1-4+rm Dear submitter, as the package anubis has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/765517 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
Bug#727318: marked as done (anubis: run dh-autoreconf to update config.{sub,guess} and {libtool,aclocal}.m4)
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:38:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#765517: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #727318,
regarding anubis: run dh-autoreconf to update config.{sub,guess} and
{libtool,aclocal}.m4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
727318: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=727318
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: src:anubis
Version: 4.1.1+dfsg1-3.1
Severity: normal
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: arm64
The package fails to build on arm64 (aarch64-linux-gnu), because the
config.{guess,sub} files are out of date, and are not updated during
the build. If possible, please do not update these files directly,
but build-depend on autotools-dev instead, and use the tools provided
by autotools-dev to update these files.
- For dh, call dh --with autotools_dev (yes, underscore).
- For other rules files, call dh_autotools-dev_updateconfig before
calling configure (in the build or configure target), and call
dh_autotools-dev_restoreconfig before calling dh_clean in the clean
target.
After the build on any architecture, and before a clean, a grep for
aarch64 in the config.sub file(s) should print some lines.
The full build log can be found at:
http://people.debian.org/~doko/logs/arm64-20131023/logs/buildlog_ubuntu-trusty-arm64.anubis_4.1.1+dfsg1-3.1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt
The last lines of the build log are at the end of this report.
Please note that these build were done in an Ubuntu development,
environment there may be a few false positives in these bug reports.
[...]
checking for memory.h... yes
checking for strings.h... yes
checking for inttypes.h... yes
checking for stdint.h... yes
checking for unistd.h... yes
checking minix/config.h usability... no
checking minix/config.h presence... no
checking for minix/config.h... no
checking whether it is safe to define __EXTENSIONS__... yes
checking for _LARGEFILE_SOURCE value needed for large files... no
checking for bison... no
checking for byacc... no
checking for flex... no
checking for lex... no
checking for idecrypt... /usr/sbin/idecrypt
checking for ANSI C header files... (cached) yes
checking for size_t... yes
checking for pid_t... yes
checking return type of signal handlers... void
checking for u_char... yes
checking arpa/inet.h usability... yes
checking arpa/inet.h presence... yes
checking for arpa/inet.h... yes
checking syslog.h usability... yes
checking syslog.h presence... yes
checking for syslog.h... yes
checking regex.h usability... yes
checking regex.h presence... yes
checking for regex.h... yes
checking for sys/types.h... (cached) yes
checking sys/socket.h usability... yes
checking sys/socket.h presence... yes
checking for sys/socket.h... yes
checking socket.h usability... no
checking socket.h presence... no
checking for socket.h... no
checking sysexits.h usability... yes
checking sysexits.h presence... yes
checking for sysexits.h... yes
checking locale.h usability... yes
checking locale.h presence... yes
checking for locale.h... yes
checking for socklen_t... yes
checking for working alloca.h... yes
checking for alloca... yes
checking whether the preprocessor supports include_next... yes
checking build system type... Invalid configuration `aarch64-linux-gnu':
machine `aarch64' not recognized
configure: error: /bin/bash build/config.sub aarch64-linux-gnu failed
make: *** [config.status] Error 1
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 4.1.1+dfsg1-4+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package anubis has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/765517
The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.
This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
Bug#681615: marked as done (apt output error)
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:38:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#765517: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #681615, regarding apt output error to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 681615: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=681615 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: anubis Version: 4.1.1+dfsg1-3 Severity: normal debian-miniitx root@~ ## apt-get install anubis Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following extra packages will be installed: guile-1.8-libs libgmp3c2 libgsasl7 libntlm0 Suggested packages: pidentd ident-server The following NEW packages will be installed: anubis guile-1.8-libs libgmp3c2 libgsasl7 libntlm0 0 upgraded, 5 newly installed, 0 to remove and 5 not upgraded. Need to get 1,498 kB of archives. After this operation, 5,345 kB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? Get:1 http://debian.savoirfairelinux.net/debian/ squeeze/main libgmp3c2 i386 2:4.3.2+dfsg-1 [325 kB] Get:2 http://debian.savoirfairelinux.net/debian/ squeeze/main guile-1.8-libs i386 1.8.7+1-3 [720 kB] Get:3 http://debian.savoirfairelinux.net/debian/ squeeze/main libntlm0 i386 1.2-1 [18.1 kB] Get:4 http://debian.savoirfairelinux.net/debian/ squeeze/main libgsasl7 i386 1.4.4-2 [190 kB] Get:5 http://debian.savoirfairelinux.net/debian/ squeeze/main anubis i386 4.1.1+dfsg1-3 [245 kB] Fetched 1,498 kB in 2s (559 kB/s) Selecting previously deselected package libgmp3c2. (Reading database ... 83718 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libgmp3c2 (from .../libgmp3c2_2%3a4.3.2+dfsg-1_i386.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package guile-1.8-libs. Unpacking guile-1.8-libs (from .../guile-1.8-libs_1.8.7+1-3_i386.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package libntlm0. Unpacking libntlm0 (from .../libntlm0_1.2-1_i386.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package libgsasl7. Unpacking libgsasl7 (from .../libgsasl7_1.4.4-2_i386.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package anubis. Unpacking anubis (from .../anubis_4.1.1+dfsg1-3_i386.deb) ... Processing triggers for man-db ... Setting up libgmp3c2 (2:4.3.2+dfsg-1) ... Setting up guile-1.8-libs (1.8.7+1-3) ... Setting up libntlm0 (1.2-1) ... Setting up libgsasl7 (1.4.4-2) ... Setting up anubis (4.1.1+dfsg1-3) ... update-rc.d: warning: anubis stop runlevel arguments (0 1 6) do not match LSB Default-Stop values (1) Starting an SMTP message submission daemon : anubis failed! invoke-rc.d: initscript anubis, action "start" failed. dpkg: error processing anubis (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 configured to not write apport reports Errors were encountered while processing: anubis E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.5 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages anubis depends on: ii guile-1.8-libs1.8.7+1-3 Main Guile libraries ii libc6 2.11.3-3 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libgmp3c2 2:4.3.2+dfsg-1 Multiprecision arithmetic library ii libgnutls26 2.8.6-1+squeeze2 the GNU TLS library - runtime libr ii libgpgme111.2.0-1.2 GPGME - GnuPG Made Easy ii libgsasl7 1.4.4-2GNU SASL library ii libltdl7 2.2.6b-2 A system independent dlopen wrappe ii libpam0g 1.1.1-6.1+squeeze1 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libpcre3 8.02-1.1 Perl 5 Compatible Regular Expressi ii libwrap0 7.6.q-19 Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra ii lsb-base 3.2-23.2squeeze1 Linux Standard Base 3.2 init scrip anubis recommends no packages. Versions of packages anubis suggests: pn
Bug#744411: marked as done (anubis: run dh-autoreconf to update config.{sub,guess} and {libtool,aclocal}.m4)
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:38:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#765517: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #727318,
regarding anubis: run dh-autoreconf to update config.{sub,guess} and
{libtool,aclocal}.m4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
727318: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=727318
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: src:anubis
Version: 4.1.1+dfsg1-3.1
User: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: autoreconf
The package fails to build on arm64 (aarch64-linux-gnu), because the
config.{guess,sub} files are out of date, and are not updated during
the build. If possible, please do not update these files directly,
but build-depend on autotools-dev instead, and use the tools provided
by autotools-dev to update these files.
- For dh, call dh --with autoreconf.
- For cdbs based build systems, include
/usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/autoreconf.mk
- For other rules files, call dh_autoreconf before calling
configure (in the build or configure target), and call
dh_autoreconf_clean before dh_clean in the clean target.
For combining autoreconf and autotools_dev, see bug #698765.
After the build on any architecture, and before a clean, a grep for
aarch64 in the config.sub file(s) should print some lines.
The full build log can be found at:
http://people.debian.org/~doko/logs/arm64-20140414/buildlog_ubuntu-trusty-arm64.anubis_4.1.1+dfsg1-3.1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt
The last lines of the build log are at the end of this report.
Please note that these builds were done in an Ubuntu development,
environment there may be a few false positives in these bug reports.
See https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS for a guide how to
address these.
[...]
checking for memory.h... yes
checking for strings.h... yes
checking for inttypes.h... yes
checking for stdint.h... yes
checking for unistd.h... yes
checking minix/config.h usability... no
checking minix/config.h presence... no
checking for minix/config.h... no
checking whether it is safe to define __EXTENSIONS__... yes
checking for _LARGEFILE_SOURCE value needed for large files... no
checking for bison... no
checking for byacc... no
checking for flex... no
checking for lex... no
checking for idecrypt... /usr/sbin/idecrypt
checking for ANSI C header files... (cached) yes
checking for size_t... yes
checking for pid_t... yes
checking return type of signal handlers... void
checking for u_char... yes
checking arpa/inet.h usability... yes
checking arpa/inet.h presence... yes
checking for arpa/inet.h... yes
checking syslog.h usability... yes
checking syslog.h presence... yes
checking for syslog.h... yes
checking regex.h usability... yes
checking regex.h presence... yes
checking for regex.h... yes
checking for sys/types.h... (cached) yes
checking sys/socket.h usability... yes
checking sys/socket.h presence... yes
checking for sys/socket.h... yes
checking socket.h usability... no
checking socket.h presence... no
checking for socket.h... no
checking sysexits.h usability... yes
checking sysexits.h presence... yes
checking for sysexits.h... yes
checking locale.h usability... yes
checking locale.h presence... yes
checking for locale.h... yes
checking for socklen_t... yes
checking for working alloca.h... yes
checking for alloca... yes
checking whether the preprocessor supports include_next... yes
checking build system type... Invalid configuration `aarch64-linux-gnu':
machine `aarch64' not recognized
configure: error: /bin/bash build/config.sub aarch64-linux-gnu failed
make: *** [config.status] Error 1
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 4.1.1+dfsg1-4+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package anubis has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/765517
The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.
This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
Bug#728917: marked as done (anubis: PAM config not working anymore with Wheezy)
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:38:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#765517: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #728917, regarding anubis: PAM config not working anymore with Wheezy to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 728917: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=728917 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: anubis Version: 4.1.1+dfsg1-3.1 Severity: normal Tags: patch The default PAM config in /etc/pam.d/anubis doesn't work anymore in Wheezy because of wrong paths. Please find a diff attached. -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.2 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages anubis depends on: ii guile-1.8-libs 1.8.8+1-8 ii libc6 2.13-38 ii libgmp102:5.0.5+dfsg-2 ii libgnutls26 2.12.20-7 ii libgpg-error0 1.10-3.1 ii libgpgme11 1.2.0-1.4 ii libgsasl7 1.8.0-2 ii libltdl72.4.2-1.1 ii libpam0g1.1.3-7.1 ii libpcre31:8.30-5 ii libwrap07.6.q-24 ii lsb-base4.1+Debian8+deb7u1 anubis recommends no packages. Versions of packages anubis suggests: pn pidentd | ident-server -- Configuration Files: /etc/anubisrc [Errno 13] Permission denied: u'/etc/anubisrc' -- no debconf information 17c17 < authrequired /lib/security/pam_nologin.so --- > authrequired pam_nologin.so 20c20 < authrequired /lib/security/pam_env.so --- > authrequired pam_env.so 23c23 < authrequired /lib/security/pam_permit.so --- > authrequired pam_permit.so 26c26 < #authrequired /lib/security/pam_listfile.so \ --- > #authrequired pam_listfile.so \ 30c30 < #authrequired /lib/security/pam_listfile.so \ --- > #authrequired pam_listfile.so \ 40c40 < account required /lib/security/pam_unix.so --- > account required pam_unix.so 43c43 < #account required /lib/security/pam_time.so --- > #account required pam_time.so 52c52 < session required /lib/security/pam_limits.so --- > session required pam_limits.so 55c55 < session required /lib/security/pam_unix.so --- > session required pam_unix.so --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 4.1.1+dfsg1-4+rm Dear submitter, as the package anubis has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/765517 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
Bug#745989: marked as done (anubis: please migrate to guile-2.0)
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:38:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#765517: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #745989, regarding anubis: please migrate to guile-2.0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 745989: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=745989 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: anubis Version: 4.1.1+dfsg1-3.1 I'm planning to have guile-1.8 removed from unstable before the freeze. Please migrate to guile-2.0 as soon as possible. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 4.1.1+dfsg1-4+rm Dear submitter, as the package anubis has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/765517 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
Bug#749439: marked as done (anubis: Multiple and conflicting definitions of function error)
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:38:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#765517: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #749439, regarding anubis: Multiple and conflicting definitions of function error to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 749439: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=749439 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: anubis Version: 4.1.1+dfsg1-3.2 Usertags: goto-cc During a rebuild of all Debian packages in a clean sid chroot (using cowbuilder and pbuilder) the build failed with the following error. Please note that we use our research compiler tool-chain (using tools from the cbmc package), which permits extended reporting on type inconsistencies at link time. [...] x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -Wall -g -O2 -Wl,-z,defs -o anubisusr anubisusr.o usr.o ./libanubisdb.a ../lib/libanubis.a -lgnutls -lgsasl -lnsl -lwrap -lpam_misc -lpam -lpcre -lgpgme -lnsl error: conflicting function declarations "error" old definition in module anubisusr file anubisusr.c line 59 void (const char *fmt, ...) new definition in module xalloc-die file error.h line 42 void (signed int, signed int, const char *, ...) Makefile:741: recipe for target 'anubisusr' failed make[4]: *** [anubisusr] Error 64 make[4]: Leaving directory '/srv/jenkins-slave/workspace/sid-goto-cc-anubis/anubis-4.1.1+dfsg1/src' Makefile:616: recipe for target 'all' failed make[3]: *** [all] Error 2 The linker will be forced to pick one of the following definitions: http://sources.debian.net/src/anubis/4.1.1%2Bdfsg1-3.2/lib/error.c?hl=227#L226 http://sources.debian.net/src/anubis/4.1.1+dfsg1-3.2/src/anubisusr.c?hl=59#L48 With either choice, some of the function calls will necessarily break as either a pointer will be used as integer value, or, worse, an integer will be dereferenced. Best, Michael pgpIaKnP_ebba.pgp Description: PGP signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 4.1.1+dfsg1-4+rm Dear submitter, as the package anubis has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/765517 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
Bug#753371: marked as done (misconfigure pam rules)
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:38:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#765517: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #753371, regarding misconfigure pam rules to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 753371: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=753371 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: anubis Version: 4.1.1+dfsg1-3.1 Severity: important Tags: security pam rules defined for anubis in /etc/pam.d/anubis are pointing to unavailable modules (but the modules exists in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/security, instead of /lib/security) thanks -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.5 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.14-0.bpo.1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages anubis depends on: ii guile-1.8-libs 1.8.8+1-8 ii libc6 2.17-97 ii libgmp102:5.0.5+dfsg-2 ii libgnutls26 2.12.20-8+deb7u2 ii libgpg-error0 1.10-3.1 ii libgpgme11 1.2.0-1.4 ii libgsasl7 1.8.0-2 ii libltdl72.4.2-1.1 ii libpam0g1.1.3-7.1 ii libpcre31:8.30-5 ii libwrap07.6.q-24 ii lsb-base4.1+Debian12 anubis recommends no packages. Versions of packages anubis suggests: pn pidentd | ident-server --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 4.1.1+dfsg1-4+rm Dear submitter, as the package anubis has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/765517 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
Bug#678144: marked as done (wrong ABS_PRESSURE test in input_raw / tslib to old)
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:32:15 + with message-id and subject line Bug#751768: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #678144, regarding wrong ABS_PRESSURE test in input_raw / tslib to old to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 678144: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678144 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: tslib Version: 1.0-11 Severity: important The consensus amongst kernel developers seems to be that touchscreens that cannot report real pressure values should not use ABS_PRESSURE at all. Older tslib versions (the input_raw plugin to be exact) used this property amongst others to determine if the device is a touchscreen at all. This behaviour was changed in tslib 4 years ago [1]. As this new usage scheme for ABS_PRESSURE is enforced for new touchscreen drivers, none of the pressureless touchscreens will work with the tslib in Debian. Therefore could you either upgrade to a newer tslib version or port the ABS_PRESSURE fix to the current version? [1] https://github.com/kergoth/tslib/commit/548320749f93dde15fef8df07238410c013ce577 -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.37-2-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 1.0-12+rm Dear submitter, as the package tslib has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/751768 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
Une séance d'épilation définitive gratuite et sans engagement valable au centre de Casablanca avec Epil Tech Maroc
Se désinscrire de la liste: http://link.email.wib.me/u/443/3d177fb97c135049c174fd34116f5a5f28cf5a1abf07aabc Rue Molière, Casablanca, 2, Maroc
Re: Processed: Re: RM: emacs23 -- ROM; replaced by emacs24
It looks like this might be possible now. $ ssh mirror.ftp-master.debian.org dak rm -Rn emacs23 Will remove the following packages from unstable: emacs23 | 23.4+1-4.1 | source emacs23 | 23.4+1-4.1+b1 | amd64, armel, armhf, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390x, sparc emacs23-bin-common | 23.4+1-4.1+b1 | amd64, armel, armhf, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390x, sparc emacs23-common | 23.4+1-4.1 | all emacs23-el | 23.4+1-4.1 | all emacs23-lucid | 23.4+1-4.1+b1 | amd64, armel, armhf, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390x, sparc emacs23-nox | 23.4+1-4.1+b1 | amd64, armel, armhf, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390x, sparc Maintainer: Rob Browning --- Reason --- -- Checking reverse dependencies... No dependency problem found. Thanks to everyone for the help. -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87lho9mqn1@trouble.defaultvalue.org
Bug#760954: marked as done (robocode: depends on obsolete Java 6 JRE)
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 19:52:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#760954: fixed in robocode 1.6.2+dfsg2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #760954, regarding robocode: depends on obsolete Java 6 JRE to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 760954: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=760954 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: robocode Version: 1.6.2+dfsg-4 Severity: normal Hello, robocode still depends on Java 6 which will not be released with Jessie. [1] The severity is only normal because the alternative dependency on java2-runtime can be fulfilled. Though please do not depend on the Java 6 runtime environment anymore. [1] https://bugs.debian.org/675495 Regards, Markus -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.14-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages robocode depends on: ii default-jre [java2-runtime]2:1.7-52 ii gcj-4.8-jre [java2-runtime]4.8.3-9 ii gcj-4.9-jre [java2-runtime]4.9.1-12 ii gcj-jre [java2-runtime]4:4.9.1-1 ii libbcel-java 5.2-10 ii openjdk-6-jre [java2-runtime] 6b32-1.13.4-4 ii openjdk-7-jre [java2-runtime] 7u65-2.5.2-2 Versions of packages robocode recommends: ii openjdk-6-jdk 6b32-1.13.4-4 Versions of packages robocode suggests: pn robocode-doc -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: robocode Source-Version: 1.6.2+dfsg2-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of robocode, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 760...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Markus Koschany (supplier of updated robocode package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 17:15:20 +0200 Source: robocode Binary: robocode robocode-doc Architecture: source all Version: 1.6.2+dfsg2-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers Changed-By: Markus Koschany Description: robocode - Java programming game based on battle tanks robocode-doc - Java programming game based on battle tanks (documentation) Closes: 590774 738018 760954 766068 Changes: robocode (1.6.2+dfsg2-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Acknowledge NMU by Simon Paillard. Unfortunately the changes were overridden by the last revision. * Add myself to Uploaders and move the package under the umbrella of the Java team. (Closes: #590774) * Repack robocode and remove sourceless Jacobe.jar file. * Depend on default-jre | java6-runtime | java7-runtime instead of obsolete Java6 runtime environments alone. (Closes: #760954) * Fix obsolete detection of Java6 runtime in robocode wrapper script, so that the game can be executed again. (Closes: #766068) * Declare compliance with Debian Policy 3.9.6. * Use compat level 9 and require debhelper >= 9. * Update Vcs-fields to canonical address and move the package to pkg-java Git repository. * wrap-and-sort -sa. * Remove build-dependency on quilt since source format 3.0 uses quilt by default. * Recommend default-jdk instead of specific JDK versions. * Suggest Eclipse IDE. * Rename README.Debian-source to README.source * Add robocode.menu file. (Closes: #738018) * Add keywords to desktop file. * Add build-arch and build-indep targets to debian/rules. Checksums-Sha1: f47ce53e18d40c279f52e6828914f90b6b134426 2087 robocode_1.6.2+dfsg2-1.dsc 92c7a77ba3a13ad6523602af1887521f4752b08a 1490400 robocode_1.6.2+dfsg2.orig.tar.xz a364b30f8a6673da56f27c520a44e1c9031986ee 11612 robocode_1.6.2+dfsg2-1.debian.tar.xz 16e38dfdfc2194eedbeb112e30ff853298e219d3 1863368 robocode_1.6.2+dfsg2-1_all.deb 6a53fb3aefb05432f2fc33eeae8f536710c1aad3 164854 robocode-doc_1.6.2+dfsg2-1_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: 72b36dc75af3f6b92d8cfe548af7e0fb089104c9e3d22ad061debca23b81
Bug#738018: marked as done (robocode: please provide a menu file and icons)
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 19:52:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#738018: fixed in robocode 1.6.2+dfsg2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #738018, regarding robocode: please provide a menu file and icons to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 738018: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=738018 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: robocode Version: 1.6.2+dfsg-3.1 Severity: wishlist User: pkg-games-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: desktop-integration goals not-gamesteam Dear maintainer, currently robocode does not supply a menu file and no menu icons. Hence the game is not well integrated into the user's desktop environment. Please consider helping to improve the desktop integration of games in Debian. https://wiki.debian.org/Games/JessieReleaseGoal Regards, Markus signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: robocode Source-Version: 1.6.2+dfsg2-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of robocode, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 738...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Markus Koschany (supplier of updated robocode package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 17:15:20 +0200 Source: robocode Binary: robocode robocode-doc Architecture: source all Version: 1.6.2+dfsg2-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers Changed-By: Markus Koschany Description: robocode - Java programming game based on battle tanks robocode-doc - Java programming game based on battle tanks (documentation) Closes: 590774 738018 760954 766068 Changes: robocode (1.6.2+dfsg2-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Acknowledge NMU by Simon Paillard. Unfortunately the changes were overridden by the last revision. * Add myself to Uploaders and move the package under the umbrella of the Java team. (Closes: #590774) * Repack robocode and remove sourceless Jacobe.jar file. * Depend on default-jre | java6-runtime | java7-runtime instead of obsolete Java6 runtime environments alone. (Closes: #760954) * Fix obsolete detection of Java6 runtime in robocode wrapper script, so that the game can be executed again. (Closes: #766068) * Declare compliance with Debian Policy 3.9.6. * Use compat level 9 and require debhelper >= 9. * Update Vcs-fields to canonical address and move the package to pkg-java Git repository. * wrap-and-sort -sa. * Remove build-dependency on quilt since source format 3.0 uses quilt by default. * Recommend default-jdk instead of specific JDK versions. * Suggest Eclipse IDE. * Rename README.Debian-source to README.source * Add robocode.menu file. (Closes: #738018) * Add keywords to desktop file. * Add build-arch and build-indep targets to debian/rules. Checksums-Sha1: f47ce53e18d40c279f52e6828914f90b6b134426 2087 robocode_1.6.2+dfsg2-1.dsc 92c7a77ba3a13ad6523602af1887521f4752b08a 1490400 robocode_1.6.2+dfsg2.orig.tar.xz a364b30f8a6673da56f27c520a44e1c9031986ee 11612 robocode_1.6.2+dfsg2-1.debian.tar.xz 16e38dfdfc2194eedbeb112e30ff853298e219d3 1863368 robocode_1.6.2+dfsg2-1_all.deb 6a53fb3aefb05432f2fc33eeae8f536710c1aad3 164854 robocode-doc_1.6.2+dfsg2-1_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: 72b36dc75af3f6b92d8cfe548af7e0fb089104c9e3d22ad061debca23b81db6f 2087 robocode_1.6.2+dfsg2-1.dsc 435164bd0ae36ccbc4d1f2f508af6b2427647cfdbb1707503395fa4edd3030de 1490400 robocode_1.6.2+dfsg2.orig.tar.xz d3db17e1a5fc21a5a6e0c59b2fe0d95bf9a687ebc3c3e3a50552828c0a65251d 11612 robocode_1.6.2+dfsg2-1.debian.tar.xz 5fa9ac85199273c033a4e390ac5ce286c4a0fc4ca7961b7e27ecba1c5cd09813 1863368 robocode_1.6.2+dfsg2-1_all.deb 8efec2235fe48f832b4aa52e6d750ee63bb084c558f56969547ecab180b1c955 164854 robocode-doc_1.6.2+dfsg2-1_all.deb Files: 4eaf88ef6c0b0456d5e65e55803ed74d 2087 games optional robocode_1.6.2+dfsg2-1.dsc 9c2cf0fe554f314767e21e22c1c42925 1490400 games optional robocode_1.6.2+dfsg2.orig.tar.xz e758ec8d9fb
Bug#766068: marked as done (robocode: fails to start because of obsolete Java environment detection)
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 19:52:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#766068: fixed in robocode 1.6.2+dfsg2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #766068, regarding robocode: fails to start because of obsolete Java environment detection to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 766068: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=766068 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: robocode Version: 1.6.2+dfsg-4 Severity: serious Robocode fails to start when OpenJDK 7 or a newer version is installed on the system. Since OpenJDK7 is the default Java runtime environment for Jessie and OpenJDK6 is going to be removed, this issue is release critical. The error message is: E: Cannot find JRE, exiting.. This is caused by an obsolete detection of Java runtime environments in the robocode wrapper script. I intend to adopt Robocode for the Java team and will prepare a fix for this issue soonish. Markus --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: robocode Source-Version: 1.6.2+dfsg2-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of robocode, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 766...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Markus Koschany (supplier of updated robocode package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 17:15:20 +0200 Source: robocode Binary: robocode robocode-doc Architecture: source all Version: 1.6.2+dfsg2-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers Changed-By: Markus Koschany Description: robocode - Java programming game based on battle tanks robocode-doc - Java programming game based on battle tanks (documentation) Closes: 590774 738018 760954 766068 Changes: robocode (1.6.2+dfsg2-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Acknowledge NMU by Simon Paillard. Unfortunately the changes were overridden by the last revision. * Add myself to Uploaders and move the package under the umbrella of the Java team. (Closes: #590774) * Repack robocode and remove sourceless Jacobe.jar file. * Depend on default-jre | java6-runtime | java7-runtime instead of obsolete Java6 runtime environments alone. (Closes: #760954) * Fix obsolete detection of Java6 runtime in robocode wrapper script, so that the game can be executed again. (Closes: #766068) * Declare compliance with Debian Policy 3.9.6. * Use compat level 9 and require debhelper >= 9. * Update Vcs-fields to canonical address and move the package to pkg-java Git repository. * wrap-and-sort -sa. * Remove build-dependency on quilt since source format 3.0 uses quilt by default. * Recommend default-jdk instead of specific JDK versions. * Suggest Eclipse IDE. * Rename README.Debian-source to README.source * Add robocode.menu file. (Closes: #738018) * Add keywords to desktop file. * Add build-arch and build-indep targets to debian/rules. Checksums-Sha1: f47ce53e18d40c279f52e6828914f90b6b134426 2087 robocode_1.6.2+dfsg2-1.dsc 92c7a77ba3a13ad6523602af1887521f4752b08a 1490400 robocode_1.6.2+dfsg2.orig.tar.xz a364b30f8a6673da56f27c520a44e1c9031986ee 11612 robocode_1.6.2+dfsg2-1.debian.tar.xz 16e38dfdfc2194eedbeb112e30ff853298e219d3 1863368 robocode_1.6.2+dfsg2-1_all.deb 6a53fb3aefb05432f2fc33eeae8f536710c1aad3 164854 robocode-doc_1.6.2+dfsg2-1_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: 72b36dc75af3f6b92d8cfe548af7e0fb089104c9e3d22ad061debca23b81db6f 2087 robocode_1.6.2+dfsg2-1.dsc 435164bd0ae36ccbc4d1f2f508af6b2427647cfdbb1707503395fa4edd3030de 1490400 robocode_1.6.2+dfsg2.orig.tar.xz d3db17e1a5fc21a5a6e0c59b2fe0d95bf9a687ebc3c3e3a50552828c0a65251d 11612 robocode_1.6.2+dfsg2-1.debian.tar.xz 5fa9ac85199273c033a4e390ac5ce286c4a0fc4ca7961b7e27ecba1c5cd09813 1863368 robocode_1.6.2+dfsg2-1_all.deb 8efec2235fe48f832b4aa52e6d750ee63bb084c558f56969547ecab180b1c955 164854 robocode-doc_1.6.2+dfsg2-1_all.deb Files: 4eaf88ef6c0b0456d5e65e55803ed74d 2087 games optional robocode_1.6.2+dfsg2-1.dsc 9c2cf0fe554f314767e21e22c1c42925 1490400 games optional
