Processed: found 719203 in 1.24-3
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 719203 1.24-3 Bug #719203 [chrony] chrony: CVE-2012-4502 and CVE-2012-4503 Marked as found in versions chrony/1.24-3. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 719203: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=719203 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.137975055626384.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: fixed 719203 in 1.24-3.1+deb7u2
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 719203 1.24-3.1+deb7u2 Bug #719203 [chrony] chrony: CVE-2012-4502 and CVE-2012-4503 Marked as fixed in versions chrony/1.24-3.1+deb7u2. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 719203: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=719203 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.137975125429465.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#442835: marked as done (please support editing recurring events)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Sep 2013 21:26:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#723921: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #442835, regarding please support editing recurring events to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 442835: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=442835 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: dates Version: 0.4.4-1 Severity: normal Hi, I am unable to edit recurring events by clicking on them or pressing the Edit button. Dates prints to stdout: ** (dates:18465): WARNING **: Couldn't find recurring event instance Regards, Paul -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (102, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=nl_NL.UTF8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages dates depends on: ii evolution-data-server 1.10.3-1 evolution database backend server ii libc6 2.6.1-4GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libecal1.2-7 1.10.3-1 Client library for evolution calen ii libedataserver1.2-9 1.10.3-1 Utility library for evolution data ii libgconf2-4 2.18.0.1-3 GNOME configuration database syste ii libglib2.0-0 2.14.0-2 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.10.13-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libpango1.0-0 1.18.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio dates recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.4.8-3+rm Dear submitter, as the package dates has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/723921 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
Bug#511078: marked as done (please add support for remote calendars)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Sep 2013 21:26:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#723921: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #511078, regarding please add support for remote calendars to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 511078: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=511078 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: dates Version: 0.4.6-1 Severity: normal I'm quite excited about Dates, since it's a smallish application that I would very much like to use on my Openmoko phone. So I'm experimenting it on my desktop computer first. Unfortunately, there seems to be a problem somewhere: even though my evolution-data-server has working remote (CalDAV) calendars, Dates doesn't see them. Evolution allows me to edit them, the Gnome clock applet displays the appointments, but Dates seems to only see the local calendar. That makes it all but useless for me, since the point of a calendar application is to have it shared over my desktop, my laptop and my mobile phone. -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages dates depends on: ii evolution-data-server 2.22.3-1.1 evolution database backend server ii libc6 2.7-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libecal1.2-7 2.22.3-1.1 Client library for evolution calen ii libedataserver1.2-9 2.22.3-1.1 Utility library for evolution data ii libgconf2-4 2.22.0-1 GNOME configuration database syste ii libglib2.0-0 2.16.6-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.12.11-4 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libpango1.0-0 1.20.5-3 Layout and rendering of internatio dates recommends no packages. dates suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- Roland Mas Qu'est-ce qui est petit, jaune et vachement dangereux ? Un canari avec le mot de passe de root. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.4.8-3+rm Dear submitter, as the package dates has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/723921 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
Bug#473664: marked as done ([wishlist] Please add feature for copying events)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Sep 2013 21:26:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#723921: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #473664, regarding [wishlist] Please add feature for copying events to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 473664: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=473664 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: dates Version: 0.4.6-1 Severity: wishlist David Prieto has asked in https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dates/+bug/75123 for a feature request: Right now you can't copy events by dragging them, you can just move them. Thanks --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.4.8-3+rm Dear submitter, as the package dates has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/723921 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
Bug#440061: marked as done (dates: Dates lacks notion of all-day events)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Sep 2013 21:26:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#723921: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #440061, regarding dates: Dates lacks notion of all-day events to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 440061: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=440061 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: dates Version: 0.4.4-1 Severity: minor Hello, While dates displays all-day events as, well, an event that starts at 0:00 and ends at 0:00 next day, it seems like nothing special. But most of the time, these types of events are different and are therefore treated differently by evolution (display-wise) for example. Some sort of toggle would be nice. Moreover, when you try to edit and all-day event and try to give it a more specific time interval, it will not work. The time is not changed, so it is also not possible to transform an all-date event (which for me sometimes codes for 'happening-this-day-but-time-interval-not-known-yet') into a time-specific event. Regards, Paul -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (102, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=nl_NL.UTF8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages dates depends on: ii evolution-data-server 1.10.3-1 evolution database backend server ii libc6 2.6.1-1GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libecal1.2-7 1.10.3-1 Client library for evolution calen ii libedataserver1.2-9 1.10.3-1 Utility library for evolution data ii libgconf2-4 2.18.0.1-3 GNOME configuration database syste ii libglib2.0-0 2.14.0-2 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.10.13-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libpango1.0-0 1.16.5-1 Layout and rendering of internatio dates recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.4.8-3+rm Dear submitter, as the package dates has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/723921 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
Bug#444849: marked as done (dates: doesn't notify the user of read-only calendars)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Sep 2013 21:26:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#723921: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #444849, regarding dates: doesn't notify the user of read-only calendars to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 444849: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=444849 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: dates Version: 0.4.4-1 Severity: normal Hi! Some of my calenders in the data server are read-only calenders. Dates does not show this (except for a normal mouse pointer instead of the move-appointment-hand pointer). This results in annoyance about the fact that double-clicking on an appointment does not yield an edit dialog. Regards, Paul -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (102, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=nl_NL.UTF8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages dates depends on: ii evolution-data-server 1.12.0-1 evolution database backend server ii libc6 2.6.1-5GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libecal1.2-7 1.12.0-1 Client library for evolution calen ii libedataserver1.2-9 1.12.0-1 Utility library for evolution data ii libgconf2-4 2.20.0-1 GNOME configuration database syste ii libglib2.0-0 2.14.1-4 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.12.0-2 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libpango1.0-0 1.18.2-1 Layout and rendering of internatio dates recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.4.8-3+rm Dear submitter, as the package dates has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/723921 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
Bug#565357: marked as done (Include a menu file for dates)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Sep 2013 21:26:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#723921: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #565357, regarding Include a menu file for dates to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 565357: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=565357 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: dates Version: 0.4.8-1 Severity: wishlist Hi! It would be nice to have a menu file for dates, please. Thank you! Best regards, Nelson -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32.3.naoliv1 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages dates depends on: ii evolution-data-server 2.28.2-1 evolution database backend server ii libc6 2.10.2-5 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libecal1.2-7 2.28.2-1 Client library for evolution calen ii libedataserver1.2-11 2.28.2-1 Utility library for evolution data ii libgconf2-4 2.28.0-1 GNOME configuration database syste ii libglib2.0-0 2.22.3-2 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.18.5-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libical0 0.44-1 iCalendar library implementation i ii libpango1.0-0 1.26.2-1 Layout and rendering of internatio dates recommends no packages. dates suggests no packages. -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.4.8-3+rm Dear submitter, as the package dates has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/723921 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
Bug#720717: marked as done (dates: FTBFS with make 3.82 from experimental: missing separator (did you mean TAB instead of 8 spaces?))
Your message dated Sat, 21 Sep 2013 21:26:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#723921: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #720717, regarding dates: FTBFS with make 3.82 from experimental: missing separator (did you mean TAB instead of 8 spaces?) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 720717: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=720717 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: dates Version: 0.4.8-3 Severity: important >From my pbuilder build log, using a chroot image with make 3.82-1 from experimental installed: ... config.status: executing depfiles commands config.status: executing libtool commands config.status: executing default-1 commands config.status: executing po/stamp-it commands configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --disable-maintainer-mode Installing in: /usr Platform front-end: gtk Debugging output enabled. Drag and drop support enabled. dh_auto_build make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/dates-0.4.8' Makefile:653: *** missing separator (did you mean TAB instead of 8 spaces?). Stop. make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/dates-0.4.8' dh_auto_build: make -j1 returned exit code 2 make: *** [build] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 -- Daniel Schepler --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.4.8-3+rm Dear submitter, as the package dates has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/723921 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
Bug#722027: marked as done (dates: FTBFS agains evolution-data-server 3.8)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Sep 2013 21:26:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#723921: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #722027, regarding dates: FTBFS agains evolution-data-server 3.8 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 722027: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=722027 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: dates Version: 0.4.8-3 Severity: important User: pkg-evolution-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: eds-3.8 Hi, we are planning to upload evolution and evolution-data-server 3.8 to unstable soon. Your package dates declares a build dependency on one of these packages: evolution-data-server-dev libedataserver1.2-dev libcamel1.2-dev libebook1.2-dev libedataserverui-3.0-dev libedata-book1.2-dev libecal1.2-dev libedata-cal1.2-dev libebackend1.2-dev During a rebuild, dates failed to build against evolution-data-server 3.8. The build log can be found at [1]. One notable change is, that libedataserverui has been dropped. If your package build-depends on libedataserverui-3.0-dev, you'll need to get rid of that dependency. As for some of the other API changes, see the release announcements of evolution-data-server 3.5.3 [2]. If you want to test-build dates, version 3.8 of evolution-data-server is currently available in experimental. If you don't have the time porting to the new e-d-s interfaces, disabling e-d-s support (temporarily) might be an option. Otherwise dates will have to be removed from testing to not block the transition. Ubuntu and Fedora have already done this transition, so it might be worthwile having a look at the patches they ship. Thanks for your cooperation. Michael, on behalf of the Debian GNOME and Evolution team. [1] http://people.debian.org/~biebl/eds-3.8/dates_0.4.8-3.log [2] https://mail.gnome.org/archives/ftp-release-list/2012-June/msg00100.html --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.4.8-3+rm Dear submitter, as the package dates has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/723921 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
Bug#611345: marked as done (contacts: photos are too small on 480x640 display with DPI of 285)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Sep 2013 21:25:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#723920: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #611345, regarding contacts: photos are too small on 480x640 display with DPI of 285 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 611345: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611345 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: contacts Version: 0.9-1 Severity: minor I submitted this upstream at https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=626568 some time ago but thought it might be a good idea to have an entry in debian BTS as well. contacts is one of the few remaining packages where I still need local modifications to make it usable on my openmoko. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: armel (armv4tl) Kernel: Linux 2.6.29-3f4c7e4fa3d937a8 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages contacts depends on: ii evolution-data-server2.30.3-1evolution database backend server ii gconf2 2.28.1-4GNOME configuration database syste ii libc62.11.2-6Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libdbus-glib-1-2 0.88-2 simple interprocess messaging syst ii libebook1.2-92.30.3-1Client library for evolution addre ii libgconf2-4 2.28.1-4GNOME configuration database syste ii libglib2.0-0 2.24.2-1The GLib library of C routines ii libgnomevfs2-0 1:2.24.3-1 GNOME Virtual File System (runtime ii libgtk2.0-0 2.20.1-1+b1 The GTK+ graphical user interface contacts recommends no packages. contacts suggests no packages. -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.9-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package contacts has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/723920 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
Bug#722025: marked as done (contacts: FTBFS agains evolution-data-server 3.8)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Sep 2013 21:25:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#723920: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #722025, regarding contacts: FTBFS agains evolution-data-server 3.8 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 722025: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=722025 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: contacts Version: 0.9-2 Severity: important User: pkg-evolution-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: eds-3.8 Hi, we are planning to upload evolution and evolution-data-server 3.8 to unstable soon. Your package contacts declares a build dependency on one of these packages: evolution-data-server-dev libedataserver1.2-dev libcamel1.2-dev libebook1.2-dev libedataserverui-3.0-dev libedata-book1.2-dev libecal1.2-dev libedata-cal1.2-dev libebackend1.2-dev During a rebuild, contacts failed to build against evolution-data-server 3.8. The build log can be found at [1]. One notable change is, that libedataserverui has been dropped. If your package build-depends on libedataserverui-3.0-dev, you'll need to get rid of that dependency. As for some of the other API changes, see the release announcements of evolution-data-server 3.5.3 [2]. If you want to test-build contacts, version 3.8 of evolution-data-server is currently available in experimental. If you don't have the time porting to the new e-d-s interfaces, disabling e-d-s support (temporarily) might be an option. Otherwise contacts will have to be removed from testing to not block the transition. Ubuntu and Fedora have already done this transition, so it might be worthwile having a look at the patches they ship. Thanks for your cooperation. Michael, on behalf of the Debian GNOME and Evolution team. [1] http://people.debian.org/~biebl/eds-3.8/contacts_0.9-2.log [2] https://mail.gnome.org/archives/ftp-release-list/2012-June/msg00100.html --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.9-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package contacts has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/723920 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
Bug#720697: marked as done (contacts: FTBFS with make 3.82 from experimental: missing separator (did you mean TAB instead of 8 spaces?))
Your message dated Sat, 21 Sep 2013 21:25:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#723920: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #720697, regarding contacts: FTBFS with make 3.82 from experimental: missing separator (did you mean TAB instead of 8 spaces?) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 720697: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=720697 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: contacts Version: 0.9-2 Severity: important >From my pbuilder build log, using a chroot image with make 3.82-1 from experimental installed: ... config.status: executing depfiles commands config.status: executing default-1 commands config.status: executing po/stamp-it commands touch debian/stamp-autotools GCONF_DISABLE_MAKEFILE_SCHEMA_INSTALL=1 /usr/bin/make -C . make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/contacts-0.9' Makefile:682: *** missing separator (did you mean TAB instead of 8 spaces?). Stop. make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/contacts-0.9' make: *** [debian/stamp-makefile-build] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 -- Daniel Schepler --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.9-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package contacts has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/723920 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
Bug#493537: marked as done (contacts: Fields in the address of a contact are misplaced when you try to edit it.)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Sep 2013 21:25:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#723920: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #493537, regarding contacts: Fields in the address of a contact are misplaced when you try to edit it. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 493537: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=493537 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: contacts Version: 0.9-1 Severity: normal After including a contact, when you try to edit it, the fields in the Address are misplaced: the Street field in the form now show the value entered for the city name, and so on. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.25-2-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages contacts depends on: ii evolution-data-server 2.22.3-1 evolution database backend server ii gconf22.22.0-1 GNOME configuration database syste ii libc6 2.7-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libdbus-glib-1-2 0.76-1 simple interprocess messaging syst ii libebook1.2-9 2.22.3-1 Client library for evolution addre ii libgconf2-4 2.22.0-1 GNOME configuration database syste ii libglib2.0-0 2.16.4-2 The GLib library of C routines ii libgnomevfs2-01:2.22.0-4 GNOME Virtual File System (runtime ii libgtk2.0-0 2.12.10-2 The GTK+ graphical user interface contacts recommends no packages. contacts suggests no packages. -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.9-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package contacts has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/723920 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
Bug#440753: marked as done (Export contacts)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Sep 2013 21:25:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#723920: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #440753, regarding Export contacts to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 440753: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=440753 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: contacts Version: 0.7-1 Severity: wishlist Hi again! Another wishlist: contacts could be able to export the contact list (as text, CSV, etc). Thank you one more time! Best regards, Nelson -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-naoliv1 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages contacts depends on: ii evolution-data-server 1.10.3-1 evolution database backend server ii gconf22.18.0.1-3 GNOME configuration database syste ii libc6 2.6.1-1+b1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libebook1.2-9 1.10.3-1 Client library for evolution addre ii libgconf2-4 2.18.0.1-3 GNOME configuration database syste ii libglib2.0-0 2.14.0-2 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.11.6-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface contacts recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.9-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package contacts has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/723920 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
Bug#440752: marked as done (contacts: Search by phone number (or another) field)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Sep 2013 21:25:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#723920: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #440752, regarding contacts: Search by phone number (or another) field to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 440752: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=440752 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: contacts Version: 0.7-1 Severity: wishlist Hi! Would be nice to ne possible to search a contact by its phone number (or other) field. Thank you! Best regards, Nelson -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-naoliv1 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages contacts depends on: ii evolution-data-server 1.10.3-1 evolution database backend server ii gconf22.18.0.1-3 GNOME configuration database syste ii libc6 2.6.1-1+b1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libebook1.2-9 1.10.3-1 Client library for evolution addre ii libgconf2-4 2.18.0.1-3 GNOME configuration database syste ii libglib2.0-0 2.14.0-2 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.11.6-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface contacts recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.9-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package contacts has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/723920 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
Bug#723921: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 0.4.8-3+rm Dear submitter, as the package dates has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/723921 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vnuhs-0008mb...@franck.debian.org
Bug#723920: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 0.9-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package contacts has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/723920 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vnugl-0008l8...@franck.debian.org
Bug#723921: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: dates |0.4.8-3 | source dates | 0.4.8-3+b1 | amd64, armel, armhf, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, s390x, sparc dates | 0.4.8-3+b2 | hurd-i386 --- Reason --- RoQA; dead upstream, unmaintained, blocks eds transition -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 723...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/723921 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vnuhj-0008mr...@franck.debian.org
Bug#723920: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: contacts | 0.9-2 | source contacts | 0.9-2+b1 | armhf, s390x contacts | 0.9-2+b2 | amd64, armel, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc contacts | 0.9-2+b4 | hurd-i386 --- Reason --- RoQA; dead upstream, unmaintained, blocks eds transition -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 723...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/723920 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vnugd-0008ki...@franck.debian.org
Bug#723989: intermittent spurious NUL
Package: nvi Version: 1.81.6-8.2 Severity: minor Occasionally, while entering text for an insert-like command, "^@" will appear on the screen immediately following the insertion point, as if there were a NUL character there in the file. It remains there during text entry, the "^@" moving along as more text is entered before it. It disappears at the end of text entry (following Esc). There's no permanent effect on the file content. -zefram -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130921221245.gb13...@fysh.org
