Bug#722663: libradius1 and libfreeradius-client2: error when trying to install together

2013-09-13 Thread Ralf Treinen
Package: libfreeradius-client2,libradius1
Version: libfreeradius-client2/1.1.6-4
Version: libradius1/0.3.2-14
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite

Date: 2013-09-13
Architecture: amd64
Distribution: sid

Hi,

automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the
same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has
detected the following problem:


WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated!
  libfreeradius-client2 libradius1
Authentication warning overridden.
Selecting previously unselected package libfreeradius-client2.
(Reading database ... 10882 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking libfreeradius-client2 (from 
.../libfreeradius-client2_1.1.6-4_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libradius1.
Unpacking libradius1 (from .../libradius1_0.3.2-14_amd64.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libradius1_0.3.2-14_amd64.deb 
(--unpack):
 trying to overwrite '/etc/radiusclient/dictionary.merit', which is also in 
package libfreeradius-client2 1.1.6-4
Errors were encountered while processing:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/libradius1_0.3.2-14_amd64.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)


This is a serious bug as it makes installation fail, and violates
sections 7.6.1 and 10.1 of the policy. An optimal solution would
consist in only one of the packages installing that file, and renaming
or removing the file in the other package. Depending on the
circumstances you might also consider Replace relations or file
diversions. If the conflicting situation cannot be resolved then, as a
last resort, the two packages have to declare a mutual
Conflict. Please take into account that Replaces, Conflicts and
diversions should only be used when packages provide different
implementations for the same functionality.

Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages
(according to the Contents file for sid/amd64, which may be
slightly out of sync):

  /etc/radiusclient/dictionary
  /etc/radiusclient/dictionary.ascend
  /etc/radiusclient/dictionary.compat
  /etc/radiusclient/dictionary.merit
  /etc/radiusclient/radiusclient.conf

This bug has been filed against both packages. If you, the maintainers of
the two packages in question, have agreed on which of the packages will
resolve the problem please reassign the bug to that package. You may then
also register in the BTS that the other package is affected by the bug.

-Ralf.

PS: for more information about the detection of file overwrite errors
of this kind see http://edos.debian.net/file-overwrites/.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vkn8f-000805...@seneca.home.net



Bug#722663: libradius1 and libfreeradius-client2: error when trying to install together

2013-09-13 Thread Daniel Pocock

On 13/09/13 08:45, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages
> (according to the Contents file for sid/amd64, which may be
> slightly out of sync):
>
>   /etc/radiusclient/dictionary
>   /etc/radiusclient/dictionary.ascend
>   /etc/radiusclient/dictionary.compat
>   /etc/radiusclient/dictionary.merit
>   /etc/radiusclient/radiusclient.conf


src:radiusclient is orphaned - it is obsolete and superseded by
src:freeradius-client

The "History" heading here explains the situation:

http://freeradius.org/freeradius-client

I would suggest the Debian should drop the src:radiusclient package
completely and I'm opening a bug for the FTP master to remove it

The freeradius-client packages could use conflicts/replaces to ease
upgrade but that would require some testing.  For now, I'm just adding
the conflicts header.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5232d3a8.7090...@pocock.com.au



Bug#722663: marked as done (libradius1 and libfreeradius-client2: error when trying to install together)

2013-09-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 13 Sep 2013 09:18:18 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#722663: fixed in freeradius-client 1.1.6-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #722663,
regarding libradius1 and libfreeradius-client2: error when trying to install 
together
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
722663: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=722663
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libfreeradius-client2,libradius1
Version: libfreeradius-client2/1.1.6-4
Version: libradius1/0.3.2-14
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite

Date: 2013-09-13
Architecture: amd64
Distribution: sid

Hi,

automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the
same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has
detected the following problem:


WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated!
  libfreeradius-client2 libradius1
Authentication warning overridden.
Selecting previously unselected package libfreeradius-client2.
(Reading database ... 10882 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking libfreeradius-client2 (from 
.../libfreeradius-client2_1.1.6-4_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libradius1.
Unpacking libradius1 (from .../libradius1_0.3.2-14_amd64.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libradius1_0.3.2-14_amd64.deb 
(--unpack):
 trying to overwrite '/etc/radiusclient/dictionary.merit', which is also in 
package libfreeradius-client2 1.1.6-4
Errors were encountered while processing:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/libradius1_0.3.2-14_amd64.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)


This is a serious bug as it makes installation fail, and violates
sections 7.6.1 and 10.1 of the policy. An optimal solution would
consist in only one of the packages installing that file, and renaming
or removing the file in the other package. Depending on the
circumstances you might also consider Replace relations or file
diversions. If the conflicting situation cannot be resolved then, as a
last resort, the two packages have to declare a mutual
Conflict. Please take into account that Replaces, Conflicts and
diversions should only be used when packages provide different
implementations for the same functionality.

Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages
(according to the Contents file for sid/amd64, which may be
slightly out of sync):

  /etc/radiusclient/dictionary
  /etc/radiusclient/dictionary.ascend
  /etc/radiusclient/dictionary.compat
  /etc/radiusclient/dictionary.merit
  /etc/radiusclient/radiusclient.conf

This bug has been filed against both packages. If you, the maintainers of
the two packages in question, have agreed on which of the packages will
resolve the problem please reassign the bug to that package. You may then
also register in the BTS that the other package is affected by the bug.

-Ralf.

PS: for more information about the detection of file overwrite errors
of this kind see http://edos.debian.net/file-overwrites/.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: freeradius-client
Source-Version: 1.1.6-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
freeradius-client, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 722...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Daniel Pocock  (supplier of updated freeradius-client 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 10:56:30 +0200
Source: freeradius-client
Binary: libfreeradius-client-dev libfreeradius-client2
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.1.6-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian VoIP Team 
Changed-By: Daniel Pocock 
Description: 
 libfreeradius-client-dev - Enhanced RADIUS client library development files
 libfreeradius-client2 - Enhanced RADIUS client library
Closes: 722663
Changes: 
 freeradius-client (1.1.6-5) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Declare conflict with obsolete libradius1 (Closes: #722663)
Checksums-Sha1: 
 9fc82187bfdce69ad41e40830fcaa129cd80b03c 2277 freeradius-cli

Processed: submitter

2013-09-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> submitter 722667 !
Bug #722667 [mpich,mpich-bin] mpich-bin and mpich: error when trying to install 
together
Changed Bug submitter to 'Ralf Treinen ' from 'Ralf Treinen 
'
> submitter 722666 !
Bug #722666 [libmpich-dev,libmpich1.0-dev] libmpich1.0-dev and libmpich-dev: 
error when trying to install together
Changed Bug submitter to 'Ralf Treinen ' from 'Ralf Treinen 
'
> submitter 722665 !
Bug #722665 [libjackson-json-java,libjackson2-core-java] libjackson2-core-java 
and libjackson-json-java: error when trying to install together
Changed Bug submitter to 'Ralf Treinen ' from 'Ralf Treinen 
'
> submitter 722664 !
Bug #722664 [libion-dev,libmama-dev] libmama-dev and libion-dev: error when 
trying to install together
Changed Bug submitter to 'Ralf Treinen ' from 'Ralf Treinen 
'
> submitter 722662 !
Bug #722662 [gist,yorick] yorick and gist: error when trying to install together
Changed Bug submitter to 'Ralf Treinen ' from 'Ralf Treinen 
'
> submitter 722661 !
Bug #722661 [dtv-scan-tables,dvb-apps] dvb-apps and dtv-scan-tables: error when 
trying to install together
Changed Bug submitter to 'Ralf Treinen ' from 'Ralf Treinen 
'
> submitter 722660 !
Bug #722660 [blt-dev,libgraphviz-dev] libgraphviz-dev and blt-dev: error when 
trying to install together
Changed Bug submitter to 'Ralf Treinen ' from 'Ralf Treinen 
'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
722660: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=722660
722661: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=722661
722662: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=722662
722664: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=722664
722665: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=722665
722666: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=722666
722667: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=722667
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.137909540215082.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#722754: blackbox link with -L/usr/lib

2013-09-13 Thread YunQiang Su
Package: blackbox
Version: 0.70.1-16
X-Debbugs-CC: wzss...@gmail.com

This package has one or more -L/usr/lib in its build system,
which will make it ftbfs if there is libraries under /usr/lib,
while is not the default architecture, mips* for example.

On mips* systems, /usr/lib is defined as place to hold O32
libraries, and /usr/lib32 for N32, and /usr/lib64 is for N64.

Beside the way, on the multiarch system like Debian, user may install
libraries under /usr/lib by hand.

Please use the default search path if you can, and please consider fix
this.

I will try to fix this bug, while if you can help to fix it, 
It will be very appreciative.

The attachement is the buildlog of this package on mips64el platform.


blackbox_0.70.1-16_mips64el.build.xz
Description: Binary data


Bug#722833: snappea link with -L/usr/lib

2013-09-13 Thread YunQiang Su
Package: snappea
Version: 3.0d3-22
X-Debbugs-CC: wzss...@gmail.com

This package has one or more -L/usr/lib in its build system,
which will make it ftbfs if there is libraries under /usr/lib,
while is not the default architecture, mips* for example.

On mips* systems, /usr/lib is defined as place to hold O32
libraries, and /usr/lib32 for N32, and /usr/lib64 is for N64.

Beside the way, on the multiarch system like Debian, user may install
libraries under /usr/lib by hand.

Please use the default search path if you can, and please consider fix
this.

I will try to fix this bug, while if you can help to fix it, 
It will be very appreciative.

The attachement is the buildlog of this package on mips64el platform.


snappea_3.0d3-22_mips64el.build.xz
Description: Binary data


Bug#722751: audit link with -L/usr/lib

2013-09-13 Thread YunQiang Su
Package: audit
Version: 1.7.18-1.1
X-Debbugs-CC: wzss...@gmail.com

This package has one or more -L/usr/lib in its build system,
which will make it ftbfs if there is libraries under /usr/lib,
while is not the default architecture, mips* for example.

On mips* systems, /usr/lib is defined as place to hold O32
libraries, and /usr/lib32 for N32, and /usr/lib64 is for N64.

Beside the way, on the multiarch system like Debian, user may install
libraries under /usr/lib by hand.

Please use the default search path if you can, and please consider fix
this.

I will try to fix this bug, while if you can help to fix it, 
It will be very appreciative.

The attachement is the buildlog of this package on mips64el platform.


audit_1.7.18-1.1_mips64el.build.xz
Description: Binary data


Bug#722783: idesk link with -L/usr/lib

2013-09-13 Thread YunQiang Su
Package: idesk
Version: 0.7.5-5
X-Debbugs-CC: wzss...@gmail.com

This package has one or more -L/usr/lib in its build system,
which will make it ftbfs if there is libraries under /usr/lib,
while is not the default architecture, mips* for example.

On mips* systems, /usr/lib is defined as place to hold O32
libraries, and /usr/lib32 for N32, and /usr/lib64 is for N64.

Beside the way, on the multiarch system like Debian, user may install
libraries under /usr/lib by hand.

Please use the default search path if you can, and please consider fix
this.

I will try to fix this bug, while if you can help to fix it, 
It will be very appreciative.

The attachement is the buildlog of this package on mips64el platform.


idesk_0.7.5-5_mips64el.build.xz
Description: Binary data


Bug#722779: hfsutils link with -L/usr/lib

2013-09-13 Thread YunQiang Su
Package: hfsutils
Version: 3.2.6-12
X-Debbugs-CC: wzss...@gmail.com

This package has one or more -L/usr/lib in its build system,
which will make it ftbfs if there is libraries under /usr/lib,
while is not the default architecture, mips* for example.

On mips* systems, /usr/lib is defined as place to hold O32
libraries, and /usr/lib32 for N32, and /usr/lib64 is for N64.

Beside the way, on the multiarch system like Debian, user may install
libraries under /usr/lib by hand.

Please use the default search path if you can, and please consider fix
this.

I will try to fix this bug, while if you can help to fix it, 
It will be very appreciative.

The attachement is the buildlog of this package on mips64el platform.


hfsutils_3.2.6-12_mips64el.build.xz
Description: Binary data


Bug#722753: beecrypt link with -L/usr/lib

2013-09-13 Thread YunQiang Su
Package: beecrypt
Version: 4.2.1-4
X-Debbugs-CC: wzss...@gmail.com

This package has one or more -L/usr/lib in its build system,
which will make it ftbfs if there is libraries under /usr/lib,
while is not the default architecture, mips* for example.

On mips* systems, /usr/lib is defined as place to hold O32
libraries, and /usr/lib32 for N32, and /usr/lib64 is for N64.

Beside the way, on the multiarch system like Debian, user may install
libraries under /usr/lib by hand.

Please use the default search path if you can, and please consider fix
this.

I will try to fix this bug, while if you can help to fix it, 
It will be very appreciative.

The attachement is the buildlog of this package on mips64el platform.


beecrypt_4.2.1-4_mips64el.build.xz
Description: Binary data


Bug#722847: tix link with -L/usr/lib

2013-09-13 Thread YunQiang Su
Package: tix
Version: 8.4.3-4
X-Debbugs-CC: wzss...@gmail.com

This package has one or more -L/usr/lib in its build system,
which will make it ftbfs if there is libraries under /usr/lib,
while is not the default architecture, mips* for example.

On mips* systems, /usr/lib is defined as place to hold O32
libraries, and /usr/lib32 for N32, and /usr/lib64 is for N64.

Beside the way, on the multiarch system like Debian, user may install
libraries under /usr/lib by hand.

Please use the default search path if you can, and please consider fix
this.

I will try to fix this bug, while if you can help to fix it, 
It will be very appreciative.

The attachement is the buildlog of this package on mips64el platform.


tix_8.4.3-4_mips64el.build.xz
Description: Binary data