Bug#530306: Mrs. Brown Janet Will Funds!!
I have Charity assignment on physically challenged persons and orphanage. Reply with details if interested.
Processed: spread: fix for Uninstall of spread breaks dpkg
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 613842 + patch Bug #613842 [spread] Uninstall of spread breaks dpkg Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 613842: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=613842 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.134174740620932.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#613842: spread: fix for Uninstall of spread breaks dpkg
tags 613842 + patch thanks Hi, attached is a patch that solves the issue for me. The reordering would have been enough in most cases, but I wanted to safeguard it a bit :) No idea how that could have worked in the first place, or did dpkg accept non-extisting users in statoverrides before? No intent to NMU at this time due to #639916 Regards Evgeni diff -u spread-3.17.4/debian/changelog spread-3.17.4/debian/changelog --- spread-3.17.4/debian/changelog +++ spread-3.17.4/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +spread (3.17.4-4.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Only delete the user and group when no statoverrides are left +Closes: #613842 + + -- Evgeni Golov Sun, 08 Jul 2012 13:21:09 +0200 + spread (3.17.4-4) unstable; urgency=low * QA upload. diff -u spread-3.17.4/debian/spread.postrm spread-3.17.4/debian/spread.postrm --- spread-3.17.4/debian/spread.postrm +++ spread-3.17.4/debian/spread.postrm @@ -1,15 +1,22 @@ #!/bin/sh -e if [ "$1" = "purge" ]; then - - if [ -x /usr/sbin/userdel -a -x /usr/sbin/groupdel ]; then - getent passwd spread >/dev/null && userdel spread - getent group spread >/dev/null && groupdel spread - fi dpkg-statoverride --remove /etc/spread/spread.conf || true dpkg-statoverride --remove /etc/spread || true dpkg-statoverride --remove /var/run/spread || true + + # only delete the user and group when no statoverrides are left + if ! dpkg-statoverride --list /etc/spread/spread.conf >/dev/null; then + if ! dpkg-statoverride --list /etc/spread >/dev/null; then + if ! dpkg-statoverride --list /var/run/spread >/dev/null; then +if [ -x /usr/sbin/userdel -a -x /usr/sbin/groupdel ]; then + getent passwd spread >/dev/null && userdel spread + getent group spread >/dev/null && groupdel spread +fi + fi + fi + fi fi #DEBHELPER#
Processing of rbbr_0.6.0-5_i386.changes
rbbr_0.6.0-5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: rbbr_0.6.0-5.dsc rbbr_0.6.0-5.diff.gz rbbr_0.6.0-5_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1snsaf-0008sa...@franck.debian.org
Bug#676105: marked as done (rbbr: FTBFS: missing build-dependency on ruby-gettext)
Your message dated Sun, 08 Jul 2012 14:47:49 + with message-id and subject line Bug#676105: fixed in rbbr 0.6.0-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #676105, regarding rbbr: FTBFS: missing build-dependency on ruby-gettext to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 676105: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=676105 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: rbbr Version: 0.6.0-3 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: default19 Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > debian/rules build > -e:1: Use RbConfig instead of obsolete and deprecated Config. > -e:1: Use RbConfig instead of obsolete and deprecated Config. > dh_testdir > ruby install.rb config --prefix=/usr --site-ruby=/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1 > install.rb:78: Use RbConfig instead of obsolete and deprecated Config. > install.rb: entering config phase... > ---> bin > <--- bin > ---> lib > ---> lib/rbbr > ---> lib/rbbr/ui > ---> lib/rbbr/ui/gtk > <--- lib/rbbr/ui/gtk > <--- lib/rbbr/ui > ---> lib/rbbr/doc > <--- lib/rbbr/doc > <--- lib/rbbr > <--- lib > ---> data > ---> data/rbbr > ---> data/rbbr/rd > <--- data/rbbr/rd > <--- data/rbbr > <--- data > install.rb: config done. > ruby install.rb setup > install.rb:78: Use RbConfig instead of obsolete and deprecated Config. > install.rb: entering setup phase... > L10n is not supported on this environment. > make: *** [build-stamp] Error 1 The full build log is available from: http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2012/06/04/rbbr_0.6.0-3_unstable.log A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: rbbr Source-Version: 0.6.0-5 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of rbbr, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 676...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luk Claes (supplier of updated rbbr package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2012 02:07:15 + Source: rbbr Binary: rbbr Architecture: source all Version: 0.6.0-5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: Luk Claes Description: rbbr - a browser for Ruby classes and documentation Closes: 676105 Changes: rbbr (0.6.0-5) unstable; urgency=low . * QA upload. * Build-depend on ruby-gettext (Closes: #676105). Checksums-Sha1: 57b77ff4cdd58efd1198e1f965b201ddc67a47bf 1037 rbbr_0.6.0-5.dsc c41ac0e87700fa89cc26a06d7fec517d0cdcd5d6 5751 rbbr_0.6.0-5.diff.gz 673f32bc7a29e0c29f4d039023c741907bb0ad9e 52246 rbbr_0.6.0-5_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: ad067babff9faa9e0cc896a90dd262c7e5b65c65752324cab32d9e6a113c88c6 1037 rbbr_0.6.0-5.dsc 558e5df7874f589184885f0fd8b395f53500b9cba92fa2dd32db99ffb7486a4d 5751 rbbr_0.6.0-5.diff.gz b3c87eee21f5444648f0fdf843bafd207c615d7b137e186046660c83566dcccb 52246 rbbr_0.6.0-5_all.deb Files: 388ed7b20316227393f43c9f741d4b00 1037 devel extra rbbr_0.6.0-5.dsc 7a73a4505de075cd8f2bc288f6933eda 5751 devel extra rbbr_0.6.0-5.diff.gz bc325855cd31293ee6648ec4db66b2a7 52246 devel extra rbbr_0.6.0-5_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk/5k+kACgkQ+C5cwEsrK57e6gCgw7KTdEi5Ld46w7a3ckbKd+s4 2wcAnAqQ4a6DDpVNe8AQZvoBiNO64771 =BNrJ -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- End Message ---
rbbr_0.6.0-5_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: rbbr_0.6.0-5.diff.gz to main/r/rbbr/rbbr_0.6.0-5.diff.gz rbbr_0.6.0-5.dsc to main/r/rbbr/rbbr_0.6.0-5.dsc rbbr_0.6.0-5_all.deb to main/r/rbbr/rbbr_0.6.0-5_all.deb Changes: rbbr (0.6.0-5) unstable; urgency=low . * QA upload. * Build-depend on ruby-gettext (Closes: #676105). Override entries for your package: rbbr_0.6.0-5.dsc - source ruby rbbr_0.6.0-5_all.deb - extra ruby Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 676105 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1snsm5-cp...@franck.debian.org
rbbr override disparity
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): rbbr_0.6.0-5_all.deb: package says section is devel, override says ruby. Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the archive: cli-mono, database, debug, fonts, gnu-r, gnustep, haskell, httpd, java, kernel, lisp, localization, ocaml, php, ruby, vcs, video, xfce, zope. At this time a script was used to reclassify packages into these sections. If this is the case, please only reply to this email if the new section is inappropriate, otherwise please update your package at the next upload. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload. If you feel the override is incorrect then please file a bug against ftp.debian.org and explain why. Please INCLUDE the list of packages as seen above, or we won't be able to deal with your request due to missing information. Please make sure that the subject of the bug you file follows the following format: Subject: override: BINARY1:section/priority, [...], BINARYX:section/priority Include the justification for the change in the body of the mail please. [NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you already filed a bug and have not received a response yet, please ignore this mail. Your bug needs to be processed by a human and will be in due course, but until then the installer will send these automated mails; sorry.] -- Debian distribution maintenance software (This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1snsma-de...@franck.debian.org
