Bug#676478: cuetools: please consider depending on id3v2 | python-mutagen
Package: cuetools
Version: 1.3.1-12
Severity: wishlist
Hi.
cuetools depends on id3v2 which is currently badly broken (see its
bugreports and their age).
OTOH, mid3v2 from python-mutagen is a drop-in replacement for id3v2 with
many fixes (and is actively maintained upstream).
Therefore, it would be great to have cuetools be updated to have its
dependencies be satisfied by python-mutagen instead of forcing a broken
package on the users.
Regards.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (350, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.4-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.utf-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages cuetools depends on:
ii id3v2 0.1.12-2
ii libc6 2.13-33
Versions of packages cuetools recommends:
ii flac 1.2.1-6
cuetools suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
Rogério Brito : rbrito@{ime.usp.br,gmail.com} : GPG key 4096R/BCFC
http://rb.doesntexist.org/blog : Projects : https://github.com/rbrito/
DebianQA: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=rbrito%40ime.usp.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120607083000.ga16...@ime.usp.br
Bug#676501: [apt-build] Problem with package-revision +b2
Package: apt-build Version: 0.12.43 Severity: normal --- Please enter the report below this line. --- Dear maintainer, I'm not sure, if this is the same as in bug #434859, which was closed in 0.12.42: I tried to recompile the sources of package ufraw from testing (0.18-1.1) locally with apt-build. While comilation run without problems, "apt-get update; apt-get -u dist-upgrade" didn't upgrade the ufraw-packages from the previous installed version from testing (0.18-1.1+b2), because the package created by apt-build had a lower version-number (0.18-1.1+apt-build1). Besides that, this results in an automatic "downgrade" of the package from +apt-build1 to +b2 on any (dist-)upgrade, as long as apt-pinning is not used (which I don't want to use at the moment). Perhaps there's a way to set the version-information to "0.18-1.1+b2-apt-build1" or similar on those cases? sincerely, Christoph Mühlmann --- System information. --- Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-686-pae Debian Release: wheezy/sid 500 unstable qgis.org 500 testing-proposed-updates ftp.de.debian.org 500 testing www.deb-multimedia.org 500 testing security.debian.org 500 testing ftp.de.debian.org 500 stable dl.google.com --- Package information. --- Depends (Version) | Installed =-+- debconf (>= 0.5) | 1.5.43 OR debconf-2.0 | libc6 (>= 2.1) | 2.13-32 perl | 5.14.2-11 apt (>= 0.5) | 0.9.5.1 gcc | 4:4.6.2-4 g++ | 4:4.6.2-4 dpkg-dev (>= 1.9) | 1.16.3 libappconfig-perl (>= 1.5) | 1.66-1 libapt-pkg-perl (>= 0.1.11) | 0.1.26+b1 devscripts | 2.11.7 apt-utils | 0.9.5.1 Recommends (Version) | Installed ==-+-=== fakeroot | 1.18.3-1 build-essential | 11.5 Package's Suggests field is empty. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fd09c55.3000...@hswt.de
Bug#674006: libwvstreams4.6-base 4.6.1-4 ----- wvdial stopped working
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 21:37:30 +1000, Peter Drysdale wrote: > As you were the kind DD who fixed the gcc 4.7 failure to build for > libwvstreaams4.6-base, I am emailing you > regarding this bug since you might be able to do a QA upload. Thanks for adding all these informations to the bug log! > I attach the Fedora version of the patch. It may need to be refreshed > for use in > Debian. > > The original discussion at Fedora for this bug is found at: > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.extras.cvs/779635 > > Would you be able to refresh this patch and upload to Debian? In general yes but ... > I am unable to do this since I am a lowly uploader for an unrelated > packages festival and speech-tools. > I have no archive upload privileges to Debian. ... you could still prepare a package (and send the debdiff to this bug) and test it and check if it affects other reverse dependencies. > If you are unable to address this, do you know the correct DD to > assist since it appears to me the package is > an orphan? I'm afraid there is no "correct DD" for an orphaned package :) If you prepare an updated package you can also cc the debian-qa or debian-mentors mailing lists, so others can have a look at the diff. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Tina Turner: Better Be Good To Me signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#673918: thttpd: New /etc/init.d script has bad logic and exits before starting daemon.
tags 673918 moreinfo thanks > I solved this by commneting out all lines between the setting of > variables and the "set -e" line before the case statment. It sounds to me like you forgot to set /etc/default/thttpd to ENABLED=yes. Did you make that change before editing the init.d script? -- Owen Marshall omarsh...@appriss.com | x3828 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/yxeobovgr37@appriss.com
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 673918 + moreinfo Bug #673918 [thttpd] thttpd: New /etc/init.d script has bad logic and exits before starting daemon. Added tag(s) moreinfo. > thank you Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 673918: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=673918 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.133907992824557.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 674342 + fixed-upstream Bug #674342 [src:gnunet-fuse] fatal error: GNUnet/gnunet_ecrs_lib.h: No such file or directory Added tag(s) fixed-upstream. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 674342: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674342 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.133909318031578.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#674342: gnunet-fuse FTBFS
GNUnet-fuse 0.9.3 is out, and it seems to build fine with gcc 4.7. So this bug is fixed upstream. I'll try to update the package as soon as possible, but it depends on GNUnet 0.9.3 which I need to package first. Cheers, Bertrand -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fd0ef0e.5070...@gmail.com
Processed (with 1 errors): merging 434859 676501
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> merge 434859 676501
Bug #434859 {Done: Dominique Lasserre } [apt-build]
apt-build doesn't handles correctly packages revision terminated with "+b1"
Unable to merge bugs because:
done of #676501 is '' not 'Dominique Lasserre '
Failed to merge 434859: Did not alter merged bugs
Debbugs::Control::set_merged('transcript', 'GLOB(0x3402950)',
'requester', 'Dominique Lasserre ', 'request_addr',
'cont...@bugs.debian.org', 'request_msgid',
'<1339095102-269-bts-lasserr...@gmail.com>', 'request_subject', ...) called at
/usr/lib/debbugs/service line 872
eval {...} called at /usr/lib/debbugs/service line 871
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
434859: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=434859
676501: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=676501
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13390951129413.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: reopening 434859
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 434859
Bug #434859 {Done: Dominique Lasserre } [apt-build]
apt-build doesn't handles correctly packages revision terminated with "+b1"
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions apt-build/0.12.42.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
434859: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=434859
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.133909538011009.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: merging 434859 676501
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > merge 434859 676501 Bug #434859 [apt-build] apt-build doesn't handles correctly packages revision terminated with "+b1" Bug #434859 [apt-build] apt-build doesn't handles correctly packages revision terminated with "+b1" Marked as found in versions apt-build/0.12.43. Bug #676501 [apt-build] [apt-build] Problem with package-revision +b2 Marked as found in versions apt-build/0.12.28. Merged 434859 676501 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 434859: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=434859 676501: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=676501 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.133909538611066.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: tagging 676501
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 676501 + confirmed Bug #676501 [apt-build] [apt-build] Problem with package-revision +b2 Bug #434859 [apt-build] apt-build doesn't handles correctly packages revision terminated with "+b1" Added tag(s) confirmed. Added tag(s) confirmed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 434859: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=434859 676501: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=676501 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.133910281914027.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#676501: [apt-build] Problem with package-revision +b2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Christoph, thank you for reporting (reopening) this bug. I actually misunderstood #434859 . Afterwards I don't know why... apt-build currently uses debchange to increase (source) version number. If source and binary versions differ you can encounter such problems. You do not get exactly the source of those rebuild packages (with +b... suffix). You only get source of last human change (in your ufraw case a NM-upload). You have to check newest binary version somehow and use it as base source version (then increase it with debchange). There occurs a big transition in apt-build (perhaps complete rewrite) so I'm sorry that all not very important bugs won't get processed next time. In other words: If you do not use pinnings you have to recompile those packages the standard way (or repack them...). Kind regards Dominique Lasserre -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJP0RbsAAoJENONJ1Ky5PTzbe8H/R72TF9sLRt7Ul4lzZEuhJJi Z7L2SKn+jr/LbE0moSoBLC3vbu70IuWl8d2lWt5U+nubI64XFrHNinPfg3i2cYd5 ErNil/3aRdmT4sn6vVaBCBRzs/DVOu0lGqzQ0FoiHZcnuxlsZrCWfWC8eVWNpF5R Re5OHQBAaL7GwoZ84sjOydMOOQnWfQjFVd+qzQUSRc6+0/qNBV6MRyYpIC4Mh+lI VW4EVq+ZfInHRh9HoXO1T4LHrkB5aRRMIZSHRgIQKQ1y5/V8D9WzeW+N+Nuj9gvs ucFbbmokW77Wy71npGy63oH7WeBUOtwBurJwS+duoZfGmRsaujarodx+BqhObbc= =tKIu -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fd11707.3030...@gmail.com
Bug#671088: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: libmusicbrainz-2.1 | 2.1.5-6.2 | source libmusicbrainz4-dev | 2.1.5-6.2 | amd64, armel, armhf, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, s390x, sparc libmusicbrainz4-dev | 2.1.5-6.2+b1 | hurd-i386 libmusicbrainz4c2a | 2.1.5-6.2 | amd64, armel, armhf, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, s390x, sparc libmusicbrainz4c2a | 2.1.5-6.2+b1 | hurd-i386 python-musicbrainz | 2.1.5-6.2 | all --- Reason --- RoQA; obsolete, does not work with recent XML API -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close Bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they where closed correctly or should have been re-assign to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 671...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/671088 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1sckxi-00075s...@franck.debian.org
Bug#671088: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 2.1.5-6.2+rm Dear submitter, as the package libmusicbrainz-2.1 has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/671088 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1sckxm-00075z...@franck.debian.org
Bug#384139: marked as done (infinite loop when www.musicbrainz.org is down)
Your message dated Thu, 07 Jun 2012 21:46:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#671088: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #384139,
regarding infinite loop when www.musicbrainz.org is down
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
384139: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=384139
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: dcd
Version: 0.99.2-3
Severity: normal
If there is a problem connecting to www.musicbrainz.org, dcd will enter
a infinite loop, not recognizing the error. I don't know if this is dcd
or libmusicbrainz fault, though.
socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_IP) = 4
fcntl64(4, F_GETFL) = 0x2 (flags O_RDWR)
fcntl64(4, F_SETFL, O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK) = 0
connect(4, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(80),
sin_addr=inet_addr("127.0.0.1")}, 16) = -1 EINPROGRESS (Operation now in
progress)
select(5, NULL, [4], NULL, {0, 0}) = 1 (out [4], left {0, 0})
select(5, NULL, [4], NULL, {0, 0}) = 1 (out [4], left {0, 0})
send(4, "POST /cgi%2dbin/mq%5f2%5f1.pl HT"..., 3745, 0) = -1
ECONNREFUSED (Connection refused)
select(5, NULL, [4], NULL, {0, 0}) = 0 (Timeout)
nanosleep({0, 1000}, NULL) = 0
select(5, NULL, [4], NULL, {0, 0}) = 0 (Timeout)
nanosleep({0, 1000}, NULL) = 0
select(5, NULL, [4], NULL, {0, 0}) = 0 (Timeout)
...
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686
Locale: LANG=es_AR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_AR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages dcd depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.6-15 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libmusicbrainz4c2a2.1.2-5Second generation incarnation of t
ii libstdc++64.1.1-5The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
dcd recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.1.5-6.2+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package libmusicbrainz-2.1 has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/671088
The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.
This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@debian.org.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
--- End Message ---
Bug#663618: marked as done (libmusicbrainz-2.1: CPPFLAGS hardening flags missing)
Your message dated Thu, 07 Jun 2012 21:46:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#671088: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #663618,
regarding libmusicbrainz-2.1: CPPFLAGS hardening flags missing
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
663618: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=663618
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libmusicbrainz-2.1
Version: 2.1.5-6.2
Severity: important
Tags: patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dear Maintainer,
The CPPFLAGS hardening flags are missing because they are not set
in debian/rules.
The following patch fixes the issue.
diff -Nru libmusicbrainz-2.1-2.1.5/debian/rules
libmusicbrainz-2.1-2.1.5/debian/rules
--- libmusicbrainz-2.1-2.1.5/debian/rules 2011-12-17
13:40:15.0 +0100
+++ libmusicbrainz-2.1-2.1.5/debian/rules 2012-03-12
18:34:07.0 +0100
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
dh_testdir
ln -sf /usr/share/misc/config.sub config.sub
ln -sf /usr/share/misc/config.guess config.guess
- ./configure $(confflags) LDFLAGS="$(LDFLAGS)" CFLAGS="$(CFLAGS)"
CXXFLAGS="$(CFLAGS)" \
+ ./configure $(confflags) LDFLAGS="$(LDFLAGS)" CFLAGS="$(CFLAGS)"
CXXFLAGS="$(CFLAGS)" CPPFLAGS="$(CPPFLAGS)" \
--prefix=/usr
touch $@
To check if all flags were correctly enabled you can use
`hardening-check` from the hardening-includes package and check
the build log (hardening-check doesn't catch everything):
$ hardening-check /usr/lib/libmusicbrainz.so.4.0.3
/usr/lib/libmusicbrainz.so.4.0.3:
Position Independent Executable: no, regular shared library (ignored)
Stack protected: yes
Fortify Source functions: yes (some protected functions found)
Read-only relocations: yes
Immediate binding: no not found!
(Position Independent Executable and Immediate binding is not
enabled by default.)
Use find -type f \( -executable -o -name \*.so\* \) -exec
hardening-check {} + on the build result to check all files.
Regards,
Simon
[1]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/SecurityHardeningBuildFlags
[2]: https://wiki.debian.org/HardeningWalkthrough
[3]: https://wiki.debian.org/Hardening
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)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=tJTQ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.1.5-6.2+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package libmusicbrainz-2.1 has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/671088
The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.
This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@debian.org.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
--- End Message ---
Bug#674006: libwvstreams4.6-base 4.6.1-4 ----- wvdial stopped working
Dear Gregor, Thank you for your email. It forced me to look further into Debian procedures and policy. Between your email and details of Debian policy I think I have found a way forward. To avoid noise to your account I will not copy you to subsequent emails regarding this bug where I can avoid it. I, of course, welcome any feedback if you choose to give it. With the very kindest regards, Peter
Bug#674006: libwvstreams4.6-base 4.6.1-4 ----- wvdial stopped working
On Fri, 08 Jun 2012 10:31:13 +1000, Peter Drysdale wrote: > Thank you for your email. It forced me to look further into Debian > procedures and policy. Between your email and details of Debian policy > I think I have found a way forward. Sounds great :) > To avoid noise to your account I will not copy you to subsequent emails > regarding this bug where I can avoid it. I, of course, welcome any feedback > if you choose to give it. Don't worry, I will read whatever gets added to this bug (as I'm subscribed to it), and I'll read it only once (thanks to procmail). And I'm happy to take a look, and maybe also upload a proposed new version, although I'd still prefer some tests and feedback from someone who has better knowledge of the package. Thanks, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Beatles signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#674006: libwvstreams4.6-base 4.6.1-4 ----- wvdial stopped working
The purpose of this email is to set forth the reasons for raising the severity of this bug and describe my intentions. 1) I intend to increase the severity to release critical. The Debian document regarding severity states: critical makes unrelated software on the system (or the whole system) break, or causes serious data loss, or introduces a security hole on systems where you install the package. I encountered this bug when a fellow Debian user did a "apt-get dist-upgrade" from squeeze to wheezy. (The machine has had dist-upgrades going back as far as etch) That machine has internet access only through a 3G modem at the site it is located. After the apt-get dist-upgade the machine was restarted and failed to connect to the internet. This made the machine completely unusable for the purposes of network access. Since no other forms of network access are available at that site the machine would not have been able to receive security updates either. The machine was transported to a wired network site [my place :-) ] to allow downgrading of this package from snapshots since this bug completely prevents network access if wvdial is used as the only 3G dialer. Subsequently network-manager has been installed on this machine to provide additional 3G modem dialer support. (Network-manager did not provide a dialer when 3G access was originally installed on this machine). I believe these facts constitute that this bug made unrelated software (browser, ssh , mail etc.) broken. Since the only network access was via this package - the completely unavailable network seriously compromised this machine. If left it in this state it would also have led to security holes accumulating. On reading of Debian guidelines I conclude this constituted a release critical bug for this machine. 2) Subject to my ability to gain access to hardware which I do not own, I intend to test the fedora patch and make it available on BTS followed by preparing for a NMU to be made available on Debian QA mailing list. The package has been abandoned upstream (homepage links are now non-existent). It is also orphaned in Debian. My intention is only to prevent users upgrading to wheezy getting a "surprise". I urge other users reading this to move to network-manager if possible before a dist-upgrade since network-manager appears better supported. I apologize for my intention not to assist in subsequent maintaining of this package after working on this bug. My decision is significantly influenced by the pejorative comments made about this software by one of the original authors at the following URL:- http://apenwarr.ca/log/?m=200912 with best regards, Peter
Processed: Raising severity
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 674006 critical Bug #674006 [libwvstreams4.6-base] wvdial stop working: Assertion `magic_number == -0x123678' failed Severity set to 'critical' from 'important' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 674006: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674006 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13391202485532.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Re: Bug#676478: cuetools: please consider depending on id3v2 | python-mutagen
Excerpts from Rogério Brito's message of Thu Jun 07 04:30:02 -0400 2012: > Package: cuetools > Version: 1.3.1-12 > Severity: wishlist > > Hi. > > cuetools depends on id3v2 which is currently badly broken (see its > bugreports and their age). > > OTOH, mid3v2 from python-mutagen is a drop-in replacement for id3v2 with > many fixes (and is actively maintained upstream). > > Therefore, it would be great to have cuetools be updated to have its > dependencies be satisfied by python-mutagen instead of forcing a broken > package on the users. > > Regards. > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: wheezy/sid > APT prefers unstable > APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (350, 'experimental') > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) > > Kernel: Linux 3.4-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) > Locale: LANG=en_US.utf-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.utf-8 (charmap=UTF-8) > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash > > Versions of packages cuetools depends on: > ii id3v2 0.1.12-2 > ii libc6 2.13-33 > > Versions of packages cuetools recommends: > ii flac 1.2.1-6 > > cuetools suggests no packages. > > -- no debconf information > Interesting! I "maintain" cue2toc. I wonder if I can write a patch for cuetools that provides a binary with the same interface as cue2toc, and also fix this dependency on /usr/bin/id3. It seems quite likely, actually, that both are true. There's only one hit for 'id3' in the entire upstream git repo: ➜ cuetools git:(master) git grep id3 src/tools/cuetag.sh:id3() src/tools/cuetag.sh:# see http://id3lib.sourceforge.net/id3/idev1.html src/tools/cuetag.sh:id3 $trackno "$file" Anyway, whether or not I'm the one to do it, it should be an easy fix. The only reference to id3 is in that shell script. -- Asheesh. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1339130339-sup-...@rose.makesad.us
Bug#674006:
Please find attached a draft patch refreshed in the Debian style. This patch has passed build testing only on a Debian system. It has passed testing on Fedora. Run-time testing this patch on Debian will have to await either till I get access to the hardware effected or another person affected by this bug test compiles on their hardware, it works and they notify me so I can hustle for a NMU. best regards, Peter 07_magic_number.diff Description: Binary data
